Plasma Mixing Driven by the Collisionless Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability: Insights from fully kinetic simulation and density-based diagnostics

Fabio Bacchini; Francesco Pucci; Giuseppe Arr\`o; Pierre Henri; Silvia Ferro

arxiv: 2602.17404 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-19 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph · physics.space-ph

Plasma Mixing Driven by the Collisionless Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability: Insights from fully kinetic simulation and density-based diagnostics

Silvia Ferro , Fabio Bacchini , Giuseppe Arr\`o , Francesco Pucci , Pierre Henri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph physics.space-ph

keywords Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilityplasma mixingcollisionless plasmasmagnetic reconnectionparticle-in-cell simulationsmagnetopause boundary layerkinetic effectsvortex advection

0 comments

The pith

The collisionless Kelvin-Helmholtz instability produces localized plasma mixing mediated by vortex advection and magnetic reconnection, with electrons remaining largely unmixed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses high-resolution two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations to track how the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability mixes plasma across collisionless shear layers. Mixing occurs but stays confined to narrow interface regions and vortex structures rather than spreading broadly across the layer. Ions mix more readily through advection and reconnection, while electrons stay largely tied to magnetic field lines. These findings indicate that kinetic-scale transport across such boundaries is more restricted than fluid approximations suggest, with implications for understanding magnetopause dynamics.

Core claim

In high-resolution two-dimensional Particle-In-Cell simulations of a finite-Larmor-radius shear-flow configuration, the nonlinear Kelvin-Helmholtz instability generates vortex structures where plasma mixing occurs primarily through advection and localized magnetic reconnection. This mixing is spatially restricted to narrow interface regions, with ions exhibiting greater mixing efficiency than electrons, which remain largely frozen-in to the magnetic field lines.

What carries the argument

Fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations using particle labeling and a complementary density-based mixing tracer to quantify species-dependent transport and its correlation with localized magnetic reconnection inside Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices.

Load-bearing premise

The two-dimensional periodic finite-Larmor-radius shear-flow setup accurately represents the three-dimensional open-boundary dynamics of real magnetopause-like shear layers.

What would settle it

In-situ spacecraft measurements of ion and electron density profiles and mixing ratios across observed Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices at the magnetopause that either match or deviate from the narrow, species-asymmetric patterns produced in the simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17404 by Fabio Bacchini, Francesco Pucci, Giuseppe Arr\`o, Pierre Henri, Silvia Ferro.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: From left to right: electron mixing fraction Fe in the lower shear layer during the nonlinear phase. Shown are the rolled-up vortices at t = 389 Ω−1 c,i , their merging at t = 501 Ω−1 c,i , and the late nonlinear stage at t = 946 Ω−1 c,i . White lines trace the in-plane magnetic field; in the right panel, two ejected plasma parcels (P1: red; P2:blue) are highlighted. turbulent behavior. In this study, we f… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Morphological evolution of the lower (y = ysh,1) and upper (y = ysh,2) shear layers at t = 445, 501, 723, 946 Ω−1 c,i during the nonlinear stage of the KHI. Each panel shows a region around each shear that is 100 × 150 d 2 i . The colorbar shows ˜n/n0 in percentage, which describes the mixing of the two plasma regions normalized to the initial value (see text). The top two rows show the ion mixing (a–d upp… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Temporal evolution of plasma mixing, current density, and Xpoints. Bottom and top shear layers (ysh,1, solid; ysh,2, dashed) are indicated in all panels. Top panel: percentage of mixed plasma ˜n/n0 for electrons (blue) and ions (red). Middle panel: maximum absolute outof-plane current density |Jz/(n0qic)| for electrons (blue) and ions (red). Bottom panel: number of X-points in each shear layer. tospheri… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Simulations and observations of the low-latitude magnetosphere-magnetosheath boundary layer indicate that the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI) drives vortex structures that enhance plasma mixing and magnetic reconnection, influencing transport and particle acceleration. We investigate the spatial localization, species dependence, and physical mechanisms of plasma mixing driven by the nonlinear evolution of the KHI. We perform high-resolution two-dimensional Particle-In-Cell simulations using a finite-Larmor-radius shear-flow initial configuration. Plasma mixing is quantified using particle labeling, a complementary density-based mixing tracer, and diagnostics of magnetic reconnection. Mixing across the shear layer is present but localized, occurring mainly in narrow interface regions and plasma structures. Ions mix more effectively than electrons, which remain largely frozen to field lines. Enhanced mixing spatially and temporally correlates with localized magnetic reconnection within and between KH vortices. Cross-boundary transport driven by the kinetic KHI remains intrinsically localized and is mediated by vortex advection and magnetic reconnection. Electron mixing is strongly constrained, indicating that kinetic-scale transport across collisionless shear layers remains limited.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

2D kinetic runs show KHI mixing stays localized to narrow interfaces and reconnection sites, with ions mixing far more than electrons.

read the letter

The core result is that in these high-resolution 2D PIC simulations of a finite-Larmor-radius shear flow, cross-boundary plasma mixing driven by the nonlinear Kelvin-Helmholtz instability remains confined to narrow interface regions and vortex structures rather than spreading broadly. Ions mix more readily than electrons, which stay largely frozen to field lines, and the enhanced mixing lines up spatially and temporally with localized magnetic reconnection inside and between the KH vortices. The authors back this with particle labeling plus a density-based mixing tracer, which together give a consistent picture inside the simulated domain. The work is straightforward kinetic plasma simulation applied to an observationally motivated setup, and the diagnostics are a modest but useful step beyond standard vortex tracking. The quantitative localization and species asymmetry are the clearest new pieces relative to earlier fluid or lower-resolution studies. The main limitation is the two-dimensional periodic geometry. Real low-latitude magnetopause layers are three-dimensional with open boundaries, so out-of-plane modes, flux-rope formation, and inflow/outflow could alter how far mixing extends or how tightly electrons remain constrained. The paper does not test that extrapolation, so the claim that kinetic-scale transport remains intrinsically limited rests on an unverified assumption about dimensionality. Parameter choices and convergence details are only sketched in the abstract, which leaves some room for referee questions on numerical robustness. This is useful for groups running kinetic boundary-layer models or developing mixing diagnostics; a reader who needs concrete numbers on ion-electron differences in 2D KHI will find the tracer results worth citing. It is solid enough simulation work to merit peer review, mainly to verify the numerics and to press on the 2D-to-3D step.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports high-resolution 2D PIC simulations of the collisionless Kelvin-Helmholtz instability using a finite-Larmor-radius shear-flow initial condition. Plasma mixing is quantified via particle labeling, a density-based tracer, and reconnection diagnostics, showing that mixing across the shear layer is localized to narrow interface regions and vortex structures. Ions mix more readily than electrons, which remain largely frozen-in; the transport is mediated by vortex advection and localized magnetic reconnection. The central claim is that cross-boundary transport driven by the kinetic KHI remains intrinsically localized and that electron mixing is strongly constrained.

Significance. If the localization result holds under the stated assumptions, the work supplies concrete, internally consistent numerical evidence that kinetic-scale transport across collisionless shear layers is limited, with species dependence and a clear correlation to reconnection sites. The combination of particle-label and density-tracer diagnostics, together with reconnection identification, strengthens the mechanistic interpretation within the simulated domain.

major comments (1)

Abstract and §4 (or equivalent results section): the assertion that 'cross-boundary transport driven by the kinetic KHI remains intrinsically localized' is derived entirely from 2D periodic simulations. The geometry precludes out-of-plane modes, flux-rope formation, and open-boundary inflow/outflow that are expected at the low-latitude magnetopause; these omissions directly affect whether the reported spatial localization and electron constraint survive in 3D. A quantitative test or explicit discussion of dimensionality effects is required before the extrapolation can be considered robust.

minor comments (2)

Figure captions and §3: clarify the precise definition and normalization of the density-based mixing tracer so that readers can reproduce the quantitative thresholds used to identify 'localized' mixing.
Methods: state the exact values of the ion-to-electron mass ratio, plasma beta, and shear-flow Mach number employed, together with any convergence tests performed on grid resolution and particle number per cell.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the constructive major comment. We address the dimensionality concern below and will make a partial revision by adding explicit discussion of 2D limitations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [—] Abstract and §4 (or equivalent results section): the assertion that 'cross-boundary transport driven by the kinetic KHI remains intrinsically localized' is derived entirely from 2D periodic simulations. The geometry precludes out-of-plane modes, flux-rope formation, and open-boundary inflow/outflow that are expected at the low-latitude magnetopause; these omissions directly affect whether the reported spatial localization and electron constraint survive in 3D. A quantitative test or explicit discussion of dimensionality effects is required before the extrapolation can be considered robust.

Authors: We agree that the simulations are strictly two-dimensional and periodic, which excludes out-of-plane modes, 3D flux-rope formation, and open-boundary effects relevant to the magnetopause. This geometry was deliberately chosen to achieve the spatial resolution required to capture finite-Larmor-radius shear and localized reconnection at kinetic scales. While we acknowledge that three-dimensional effects could introduce additional mixing channels, the reported localization of mixing to narrow interfaces and vortex structures, together with the strong electron constraint, is a direct consequence of the kinetic physics captured in 2D. We will revise the manuscript by adding a new paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly addresses dimensionality limitations, states that the localization result is demonstrated in 2D, and notes that future 3D simulations would be needed for quantitative extrapolation. This addition will temper the abstract and conclusions accordingly without altering the core 2D findings. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims follow directly from 2D PIC simulation outputs and diagnostics

full rationale

The paper performs high-resolution 2D Particle-In-Cell simulations with a finite-Larmor-radius shear-flow initial condition and periodic boundaries. Plasma mixing is quantified via particle labeling, a density-based tracer, and reconnection diagnostics applied to the simulation data. The central claims (localized cross-boundary transport mediated by vortex advection and reconnection; stronger ion than electron mixing) are direct inferences from these outputs. No parameters are fitted to a subset of results and then re-predicted; no self-citation chain supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present work relies upon; the derivation does not reduce to self-definition or renaming of known results. The 2D periodic assumption is stated explicitly but does not create circularity in the reported chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the collisionless approximation and the representativeness of the chosen 2D shear-flow initial condition; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Collisionless plasma approximation holds throughout the domain
Standard for space-plasma PIC studies; invoked by the choice of fully kinetic simulation without collisions.
domain assumption Two-dimensional periodic shear-flow initial condition represents magnetopause boundary-layer dynamics
Stated in the abstract as the setup used; its validity is not derived within the work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5500 in / 1294 out tokens · 32995 ms · 2026-05-15T20:47:35.124869+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We perform high-resolution two-dimensional Particle-In-Cell simulations using a finite-Larmor-radius shear-flow initial configuration. Plasma mixing is quantified using particle labeling, a complementary density-based mixing tracer, and diagnostics of magnetic reconnection.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Cross-boundary transport driven by the kinetic KHI remains intrinsically localized and is mediated by vortex advection and magnetic reconnection.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

M., Delcourt, D., Terada, N., & André, N

Aizawa, S., Raines, J. M., Delcourt, D., Terada, N., & André, N. 2020, J. Geo- phys. Res. Space Phys., 125, e27871

work page 2020
[2]

2023, ApJS, 268, 60

Bacchini, F. 2023, ApJS, 268, 60

work page 2023
[3]

Brackbill, J. U. & Forslund, D. L. 1982, J. Comput. Phys., 46, 271

work page 1982
[4]

S., Henri, P., Califano, F., et al

Cerri, S. S., Henri, P., Califano, F., et al. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 112112

work page 2013
[5]

1961, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability

Chandrasekhar, S. 1961, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability

work page 1961
[6]

2024, ApJS, 271, 63

Croonen, J., Pezzini, L., Bacchini, F., & Lapenta, G. 2024, ApJS, 271, 63

work page 2024
[7]

2019, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85, 805850601

Dargent, J., Lavorenti, F., Califano, F., et al. 2019, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85, 805850601

work page 2019
[8]

Dialynas, K. 2018, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 123, 7271

work page 2018
[9]

2016, Geophys

Eriksson, S., Lavraud, B., Wilder, V ., et al. 2016, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5606

work page 2016
[10]

2012, Plasma Phys

Faganello, M., Califano, F., Pegoraro, F., Andreussi, T., & Benkadda, S. 2012, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 54, 124037

work page 2012
[11]

2024, Phys

Ferro, S., Faganello, M., Califano, F., & Bacchini, F. 2024, Phys. Plasmas, 31, 052902

work page 2024
[12]

Hasegawa, H., Fujimoto, M., & Phan, T. D. 2004, Nature, 430, 755

work page 2004
[13]

S., Califano, F., et al

Henri, P., Cerri, S. S., Califano, F., et al. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 102118

work page 2013
[14]

2013, Phys

Karimabadi, H., Roytershteyn, V ., Wan, M., et al. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20

work page 2013
[15]

2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A12

Kieokaew, R., Lavraud, B., Yang, Y ., et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A12

work page 2021
[16]

M., et al

Koh, Z.-W., Poh, G., Fowler, C. M., et al. 2025, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52

work page 2025
[17]

Lapenta, G. 2017, J. Comput. Phys., 334, 349

work page 2017
[18]

Ma, X., Delamere, P., Otto, A., & Burkholder, B. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 122, 10382

work page 2017
[19]

2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 988, 248

Ma, X., Opher, M., & Kornbleuth, M. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 988, 248

work page 2025
[20]

A., & Otto, A

Ma, X., Stauffer, B., Delamere, P. A., & Otto, A. 2015, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 120, 1867

work page 2015
[21]

2010, Math

Markidis, S., Lapenta, G., & Rizwan-uddin. 2010, Math. Comput. Simul., 80, 1509

work page 2010
[22]

W., Allegrini, F., et al

Montgomery, J., Ebert, R. W., Allegrini, F., et al. 2023, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50

work page 2023
[23]

Nakamura, T. K. M. & Daughton, W. 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8704

work page 2014
[24]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Daughton, W., Karimabadi, H., & Eriksson, S. 2013, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 118, 5742

work page 2013
[25]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Eriksson, S., Hasegawa, H., et al. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 122, 11,505

work page 2017
[26]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Hasegawa, H., Daughton, W., et al. 2017, Nature Commu- nications, 8, 1582

work page 2017
[27]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Hasegawa, H., Shinohara, I., & Fujimoto, M. 2011, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 116, A03227

work page 2011
[28]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Plaschke, F., Hasegawa, H., et al. 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47

work page 2020
[29]

& Otto, A

Nykyri, K. & Otto, A. 2001, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3565

work page 2001
[30]

2006, Ann

Nykyri, K., Otto, A., Lavraud, B., et al. 2006, Ann. Geophys., 24, 2619

work page 2006
[31]

2016, Astrophys

Olshevsky, V ., Deca, J., Divin, A., et al. 2016, Astrophys. J., 819, 52

work page 2016
[32]

Radhakrishnan, D. K. V ., Fuselier, S. A., Petrinec, S. M., et al. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

work page 2024
[33]

A., Bagenal, F., Wilson, R

Ranquist, D. A., Bagenal, F., Wilson, R. J., et al. 2019, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 124, 9106

work page 2019
[34]

S., McFadden, J

Ruhunusiri, S., Halekas, J. S., McFadden, J. P., et al. 2016, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4763

work page 2016
[35]

H., Shay, M

Servidio, S., Matthaeus, W. H., Shay, M. A., Cassak, P. A., & Dmitruk, P. 2009, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 115003

work page 2009
[36]

V ., Graham, D

Settino, A., Khotyaintsev, Y . V ., Graham, D. B., Perrone, D., & Valentini, F. 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 127, e2021JA029758

work page 2022
[37]

A., et al

Settino, A., Nakamura, R., Blasl, K. A., et al. 2024, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 129

work page 2024
[38]

E., Eriksson, S., Wilder, F

Stawarz, J. E., Eriksson, S., Wilder, F. D., et al. 2016, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 121, 11,021

work page 2016
[39]

A., Slavin, J

Sundberg, T., Boardsen, S. A., Slavin, J. A., et al. 2012, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 117

work page 2012
[40]

H., Servidio, S., & Oughton, S

Wan, M., Matthaeus, W. H., Servidio, S., & Oughton, S. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 042307 Article number, page 6 Ferro et al.: Plasma Mixing in Kinetic KHI Fig. B.1.Panels (a) and (c) show the percentage of mixed plasma, ˜n/n0, for ions and electrons in the lower shear layer with a finiteB x att=334Ω −1 c,i . Panels (b) and (d) show the corresponding ion and...

work page 2013

[1] [1]

M., Delcourt, D., Terada, N., & André, N

Aizawa, S., Raines, J. M., Delcourt, D., Terada, N., & André, N. 2020, J. Geo- phys. Res. Space Phys., 125, e27871

work page 2020

[2] [2]

2023, ApJS, 268, 60

Bacchini, F. 2023, ApJS, 268, 60

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Brackbill, J. U. & Forslund, D. L. 1982, J. Comput. Phys., 46, 271

work page 1982

[4] [4]

S., Henri, P., Califano, F., et al

Cerri, S. S., Henri, P., Califano, F., et al. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 112112

work page 2013

[5] [5]

1961, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability

Chandrasekhar, S. 1961, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability

work page 1961

[6] [6]

2024, ApJS, 271, 63

Croonen, J., Pezzini, L., Bacchini, F., & Lapenta, G. 2024, ApJS, 271, 63

work page 2024

[7] [7]

2019, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85, 805850601

Dargent, J., Lavorenti, F., Califano, F., et al. 2019, Journal of Plasma Physics, 85, 805850601

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Dialynas, K. 2018, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 123, 7271

work page 2018

[9] [9]

2016, Geophys

Eriksson, S., Lavraud, B., Wilder, V ., et al. 2016, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5606

work page 2016

[10] [10]

2012, Plasma Phys

Faganello, M., Califano, F., Pegoraro, F., Andreussi, T., & Benkadda, S. 2012, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 54, 124037

work page 2012

[11] [11]

2024, Phys

Ferro, S., Faganello, M., Califano, F., & Bacchini, F. 2024, Phys. Plasmas, 31, 052902

work page 2024

[12] [12]

Hasegawa, H., Fujimoto, M., & Phan, T. D. 2004, Nature, 430, 755

work page 2004

[13] [13]

S., Califano, F., et al

Henri, P., Cerri, S. S., Califano, F., et al. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 102118

work page 2013

[14] [14]

2013, Phys

Karimabadi, H., Roytershteyn, V ., Wan, M., et al. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20

work page 2013

[15] [15]

2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A12

Kieokaew, R., Lavraud, B., Yang, Y ., et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A12

work page 2021

[16] [16]

M., et al

Koh, Z.-W., Poh, G., Fowler, C. M., et al. 2025, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52

work page 2025

[17] [17]

Lapenta, G. 2017, J. Comput. Phys., 334, 349

work page 2017

[18] [18]

Ma, X., Delamere, P., Otto, A., & Burkholder, B. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 122, 10382

work page 2017

[19] [19]

2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 988, 248

Ma, X., Opher, M., & Kornbleuth, M. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 988, 248

work page 2025

[20] [20]

A., & Otto, A

Ma, X., Stauffer, B., Delamere, P. A., & Otto, A. 2015, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 120, 1867

work page 2015

[21] [21]

2010, Math

Markidis, S., Lapenta, G., & Rizwan-uddin. 2010, Math. Comput. Simul., 80, 1509

work page 2010

[22] [22]

W., Allegrini, F., et al

Montgomery, J., Ebert, R. W., Allegrini, F., et al. 2023, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50

work page 2023

[23] [23]

Nakamura, T. K. M. & Daughton, W. 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8704

work page 2014

[24] [24]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Daughton, W., Karimabadi, H., & Eriksson, S. 2013, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 118, 5742

work page 2013

[25] [25]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Eriksson, S., Hasegawa, H., et al. 2017, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 122, 11,505

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Hasegawa, H., Daughton, W., et al. 2017, Nature Commu- nications, 8, 1582

work page 2017

[27] [27]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Hasegawa, H., Shinohara, I., & Fujimoto, M. 2011, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 116, A03227

work page 2011

[28] [28]

Nakamura, T. K. M., Plaschke, F., Hasegawa, H., et al. 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47

work page 2020

[29] [29]

& Otto, A

Nykyri, K. & Otto, A. 2001, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3565

work page 2001

[30] [30]

2006, Ann

Nykyri, K., Otto, A., Lavraud, B., et al. 2006, Ann. Geophys., 24, 2619

work page 2006

[31] [31]

2016, Astrophys

Olshevsky, V ., Deca, J., Divin, A., et al. 2016, Astrophys. J., 819, 52

work page 2016

[32] [32]

Radhakrishnan, D. K. V ., Fuselier, S. A., Petrinec, S. M., et al. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

work page 2024

[33] [33]

A., Bagenal, F., Wilson, R

Ranquist, D. A., Bagenal, F., Wilson, R. J., et al. 2019, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 124, 9106

work page 2019

[34] [34]

S., McFadden, J

Ruhunusiri, S., Halekas, J. S., McFadden, J. P., et al. 2016, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4763

work page 2016

[35] [35]

H., Shay, M

Servidio, S., Matthaeus, W. H., Shay, M. A., Cassak, P. A., & Dmitruk, P. 2009, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 115003

work page 2009

[36] [36]

V ., Graham, D

Settino, A., Khotyaintsev, Y . V ., Graham, D. B., Perrone, D., & Valentini, F. 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 127, e2021JA029758

work page 2022

[37] [37]

A., et al

Settino, A., Nakamura, R., Blasl, K. A., et al. 2024, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 129

work page 2024

[38] [38]

E., Eriksson, S., Wilder, F

Stawarz, J. E., Eriksson, S., Wilder, F. D., et al. 2016, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 121, 11,021

work page 2016

[39] [39]

A., Slavin, J

Sundberg, T., Boardsen, S. A., Slavin, J. A., et al. 2012, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 117

work page 2012

[40] [40]

H., Servidio, S., & Oughton, S

Wan, M., Matthaeus, W. H., Servidio, S., & Oughton, S. 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 042307 Article number, page 6 Ferro et al.: Plasma Mixing in Kinetic KHI Fig. B.1.Panels (a) and (c) show the percentage of mixed plasma, ˜n/n0, for ions and electrons in the lower shear layer with a finiteB x att=334Ω −1 c,i . Panels (b) and (d) show the corresponding ion and...

work page 2013