Recognition: no theorem link
The coherent-state transformation in quantum electrodynamics coupled cluster theory
Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:45 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A coherent-state transformation applied to the QED Hartree-Fock reference produces a renormalized QED-CC Lagrangian from transformed polaritonic operators.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
A QED Hartree-Fock reference state parametrized by the CS transformation leads to a QED-CC Lagrangian formally determined by CS-representations of polaritonic Hamiltonian, polaritonic cluster and polaritonic deexcitation operators. The approach differs from prior QED-CC by using photon-added coherent states. It produces a renormalization of both QED-CC correlation energy and ground state that depends on the mean-field expectation value of the molecular dipole operator, breaking origin invariance for charged systems. Electronic contributions are renormalized by CS-transformed mixed excitation and deexcitation operators, while the CS-transformed single-photon excitation affects only the ground
What carries the argument
The non-vanishing commutator between the coherent-state transformation and the polaritonic cluster operator, which determines the form of the transformed polaritonic Hamiltonian, cluster, and deexcitation operators in the QED-CC Lagrangian.
Load-bearing premise
The non-vanishing commutator between the coherent-state transformation and the polaritonic cluster operator can be handled formally without additional multi-photon terms or cavity-Born-Oppenheimer corrections in the low-frequency regime.
What would settle it
Numerical evaluation of the QED-CC correlation energy for a molecule with non-zero dipole moment, checking whether it diverges as cavity frequency approaches zero.
Figures
read the original abstract
We analyse the coherent-state (CS) transformation in quantum electrodynamics coupled cluster (QED-CC) theory from the perspective of its non-vanishing commutator with the polaritonic cluster operator. Specifically, we show that a QED Hartree-Fock (QED-HF) reference state parametrized by the CS transformation leads to a QED-CC Lagrangian formally determined by CS-representations of polaritonic Hamiltonian, polaritonic cluster and polaritonic deexcitation operators. Moreover, the herein proposed approach differs from the original formulation of QED-CC theory in the definition of the photon state basis and exploits photon-added coherent states in contrast to previously considered displaced number states. We find a renormalization of both QED-CC correlation energy and QED-CC ground state induced by the CS transformation, which depends on the mean-field expectation value of the molecular dipole operator and therefore breaks origin invariance for charged systems. Electronic contributions to correlation energy and QED-CC ground state are renormalized by CS-transformed mixed excitation and deexcitation operators. In contrast, the CS-transformed single-photon excitation affects only the QED-CC ground state but not directly the correlation energy. The renormalized QED-CC ansatz becomes similar to the original QED-CC formulation for large cavity frequencies leading to small renormalization corrections. A divergent correlation energy for molecules with a non-vanishing molecular dipole moment is found in the low-frequency limit, which we discuss with respect to multi-photon excitations in the polaritonic cluster operator and the relevance of the cavity-Born-Oppenheimer framework.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper analyzes the coherent-state (CS) transformation in quantum electrodynamics coupled cluster (QED-CC) theory, emphasizing its non-vanishing commutator with the polaritonic cluster operator. It shows that a QED Hartree-Fock reference parametrized by the CS transformation yields a QED-CC Lagrangian determined by the CS representations of the polaritonic Hamiltonian, cluster operator T, and deexcitation operators. The approach uses photon-added coherent states rather than displaced number states, leading to dipole-dependent renormalizations of the correlation energy and ground state that break origin invariance for charged systems. Electronic contributions are renormalized via CS-transformed mixed operators, while single-photon excitations affect only the ground state; the ansatz approaches the original QED-CC form at large cavity frequencies, but exhibits a divergent correlation energy for non-zero molecular dipoles in the low-frequency limit, with discussion of multi-photon excitations and the cavity-Born-Oppenheimer framework.
Significance. If the formal analysis of the commutator and resulting renormalizations holds, the work identifies key limitations in standard QED-CC implementations, particularly the origin dependence and low-frequency divergences, which could inform refinements to polaritonic coupled-cluster methods and highlight the need for multi-photon amplitudes or alternative reference states.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the CS-transformed QED-CC Lagrangian is 'formally determined' by the CS-representations of the polaritonic Hamiltonian, T, and deexcitation operators does not address how the non-vanishing [U, T] commutator (where U is the displacement operator) generates explicit multi-photon terms beyond single excitations; without the expanded form of these terms, the assertion that they can be absorbed into the standard polaritonic cluster ansatz remains unverified.
- [Abstract] Abstract: The reported divergence of the correlation energy in the low-frequency limit for molecules with non-vanishing dipole moment is attributed to the CS transformation but lacks an explicit derivation showing how the commutator-induced higher-order photon processes produce this divergence; a concrete expansion of the similarity-transformed Hamiltonian or numerical illustration at small cavity frequencies would be required to substantiate this central observation.
- [Abstract] Abstract: The renormalization of the QED-CC correlation energy and ground state is stated to depend on the mean-field expectation value of the molecular dipole operator, breaking origin invariance for charged systems, yet the manuscript provides no step-by-step operator algebra tracing this dependence from the CS-transformed mixed excitation/deexcitation operators to the final energy expression.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The distinction between photon-added coherent states and previously used displaced number states is introduced but would benefit from a brief table or equation contrasting the two photon-state bases and their action on the vacuum.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of the formal analysis.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the CS-transformed QED-CC Lagrangian is 'formally determined' by the CS-representations of the polaritonic Hamiltonian, T, and deexcitation operators does not address how the non-vanishing [U, T] commutator (where U is the displacement operator) generates explicit multi-photon terms beyond single excitations; without the expanded form of these terms, the assertion that they can be absorbed into the standard polaritonic cluster ansatz remains unverified.
Authors: The abstract condenses the central result that the Lagrangian is formally determined by the CS representations of the Hamiltonian and operators; the non-vanishing commutator is accounted for by construction through the use of photon-added coherent states. The full manuscript derives this commutator explicitly in Section III and shows that the resulting multi-photon contributions are absorbed into the effective polaritonic cluster operator. To improve verifiability, we will revise the abstract to note this absorption and expand the main text with the explicit form of the higher-order photon terms generated by the commutator. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported divergence of the correlation energy in the low-frequency limit for molecules with non-vanishing dipole moment is attributed to the CS transformation but lacks an explicit derivation showing how the commutator-induced higher-order photon processes produce this divergence; a concrete expansion of the similarity-transformed Hamiltonian or numerical illustration at small cavity frequencies would be required to substantiate this central observation.
Authors: The divergence follows from the scaling of the dipole-dependent terms in the CS-transformed energy expression as the cavity frequency approaches zero. The manuscript analyzes this limit by examining the behavior of the renormalized operators. We agree that an explicit expansion would strengthen the claim and will add a concrete operator expansion of the similarity-transformed Hamiltonian (highlighting the divergent contributions) to the revised manuscript, along with a brief numerical illustration for a model system at small frequencies. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The renormalization of the QED-CC correlation energy and ground state is stated to depend on the mean-field expectation value of the molecular dipole operator, breaking origin invariance for charged systems, yet the manuscript provides no step-by-step operator algebra tracing this dependence from the CS-transformed mixed excitation/deexcitation operators to the final energy expression.
Authors: The dependence on the mean-field dipole expectation value enters through the action of the displacement operator on the mixed excitation and deexcitation operators, producing additive renormalization terms in the Lagrangian. This is derived in the manuscript from the CS-transformed operators. We will add an explicit step-by-step operator algebra walkthrough, tracing the transformation from the mixed operators to the final renormalized energy expression, in an expanded section or appendix of the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; formal operator derivation is self-contained
full rationale
The paper conducts a purely algebraic analysis of the coherent-state transformation applied to the QED-CC Lagrangian, starting from the non-vanishing commutator [U, T] and deriving renormalized operators and energies directly from the definitions of the polaritonic Hamiltonian, cluster operator, and de-excitation operators. No parameters are fitted inside the manuscript, no predictions are constructed by renaming fitted inputs, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation. The renormalization of correlation energy, origin dependence, and low-frequency divergence are explicit consequences of the commutator algebra rather than inputs smuggled in by definition. The derivation therefore stands on standard QED-CC operator properties without reducing to its own outputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- standard math Standard assumptions of coupled cluster theory and quantum electrodynamics hold for the polaritonic operators
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
via the bosonic operator[10] ˆUz = ezλ (ˆb† λ − ˆbλ ) , z λ = g0 ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 √ 2ℏω c , (5) which depends on the mean-field dipole expectation value, ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 = ⟨Φ 0| ˆdλ |Φ 0⟩, and exclusively acts on the cavity subspace (cf. Appendix A for details). The QED- HF reference state for the polaritonic Hamiltonian in Eq.(
-
[2]
is then defined as |R⟩ = ˆUz |Φ 0, 0c⟩ , (6) with corresponding QED-HF energy E0 = ⟨Φ 0, 0c| ˆU † z ˆH ˆUz|Φ 0, 0c⟩ . (7) The CS transformation minimizes E0 with respect to variations of photonic degrees of freedom and renders the mean-field energy origin-invariant.[10] By inspecting Eq.( 7), we may alternatively follow the argument of Ref.[10] that |Φ 0, 0...
-
[3]
and (3)). The inequality between both expressions results from the non-vanishing commutator [e ˆQ, ˆUz] ̸= 0 , (9) between polaritonic cluster and CS transformation op- erators. Moreover, the energy expression resulting from the revised QED-CC ansatz, | ˜Ψ qed cc ⟩, in Eq.(
-
[4]
is given by ˜Ecc = ⟨Φ 0, 0c| ˆU † z e− ˆQ ˆHe ˆQ ˆUz|Φ 0, 0c⟩ , (10) and accounts for the CS transformation of both po- laritonic cluster operator and polaritonic Hamiltonian. Thus all photonic operators contributing to ˆH and ˆQ in Eq.(10) are consistently transformed to the CS-picture in contrast to Eq.( 1), where only photonic operators in the polarito...
-
[5]
and λ ν ˜Rν cc = ⟨Φ 0, 0c| ˆU † z ˆΛ Qe− ˆQ ˆHe ˆQ ˆUz|Φ 0, 0c⟩ , (12) with polaritonic deexcitation operator, ˆΛ Q (cf. Sec.V). QED-CC amplitude equations, ˜Rν cc = 0, are obtained via the condition, ∂ λ ν ˜Lcc = 0, with multipliers, λ ν , corre- sponding to excitations of electronic, photonic and mixed character. We assume here and throughout the rest o...
-
[6]
due to respectively corrected amplitude equations to be discussed in Sec. V. The CS- induced shift of ˆS1 1 can be interpreted as renormalization of the electronic singles amplitudes ˜tai = ˜ta i + g0 ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 √ 2ℏω c ˜sλ ai , (20) which depend explicitly on the light-matter interaction strength, g0, cavity frequency, ω c, and molecular mean- field dipole ...
-
[7]
The corresponding diagrammatic representation is shown in Fig
is given by ˜∆ ren = g0 ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 2√ 2ℏω c ( ˜sλ ai˜tb j + ˜sλ bj ˜ta i ) ¯wai bj − g2 0 ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 ˜sλ ai˜γ λ ′ dai λ ′ + g2 0 ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 ⟨ ˆdλ ′ ⟩0 4ℏω c ˜sλ ai˜sλ ′ bj ¯wai bj , (23) where we distinguish contractions over distinct polariza- tion indices λ, λ ′ in the second and third term. The corresponding diagrammatic representation is shown in Fig. 2, wh...
-
[8]
( cf. Appendix C). We focused so far on the CS-transformed mixed excita- tion operator in Eq.( 19) and its connection to electronic single excitations. The photonic counterpart in Eq.( 18) acquires in contrast only a constant shift, which vanishes throughout the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff (BCH) ex- pansion of the similarity-transformed polaritonic Hamil- ton...
-
[9]
as ˜λ ia = ˜λ i a + g0 ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 √ 2ℏω c ˜sia λ , (27) in analogy to the related electronic singles amplitudes in Eq.( 20). We may now write Eq.( 12) as λ ν ˜Rν cc = ˜λ i a ˜Ra i + ˜γ λ ˜Rλ + ˜sia λ ˜Rλ ai , (28) and obtain related amplitude equations by making ˜Lcc stationary with respect to multipliers ˜λ i a, ˜sia λ and ˜ γ λ ˜Ra i = ⟨Φ i a, 0c|e− ˆQz ˆ...
-
[10]
can be made formally equiva- lent to the original QED-CC expression by replacing ˜ta i in Eq.(
-
[11]
with ˜tai. The same holds for electronic and mixed amplitude equations, when one replaces ˜λ i a with the renormalized ˜λ ia expression in Eq.( 27). However, this is not possible for single-photon excitations due to the non-uniform behaviour of the constant shift in Eqs.( 18) and (25), resulting in a modified amplitude equation ( 30). A consistent reformul...
-
[12]
quadratic in g0 become small. In con- trast, the low-frequency limit of the renormalized QED- CC approach exhibits a diverging behaviour as zλ ∼ 1 √ ω c 5 for ω c → 0 if ⟨ ˆdλ ⟩0 ̸= 0. This observation is challenged by recent theoretical results of Haugland et al. [29] reporting instead on a smooth convergence of the QED-CC energy Eq.(
-
[13]
towards a frequency-independent value as ω c → 0. The authors rationalized their findings by noting that the electron-photon correlation contribution to the QED-CC energy vanishes in this context in line with the related light-matter interaction term. The low-frequency limit was then interpreted as the cavity frequency-independent cavity Born-Oppenheimer (...
-
[14]
does not necessarily lead to a stationary correlated electronic energy in the CBO framework as discussed in Refs.[18, 25]. Furthermore, there is indeed no electron-photon correlation in the CBO ground state problem, which is by construction purely electronic and more importantly “photon-free” due to adiabatic separa- tion of electrons and cavity modes.[30...
-
[15]
such that the respective polaritonic Hamiltonian in CS-representation ( cf. Eq.(15)) is obtained. We first note that bosonic operators transform for a real zλ as ˆU † zˆb† λ ˆUz = ˆb† λ + zλ , ˆU † zˆbλ ˆUz = ˆbλ + zλ . (A.1) The relevant terms in the polaritonic Hamiltonian ( cf. Eq.( 2)), which transform non-trivially under the action of ˆUz, are the cav...
-
[16]
and Sec. A, such that the expectation value turns into ⟨ˆnλ ⟩0 = ⟨Φ 0, 0c|ˆb† λ ˆbλ |Φ 0, 0c⟩ − g0 √ 2ℏω c ℏω c ⟨Φ 0, 0c|∆ ˆd(e) λ ( ˆb† λ + ˆbλ ) |Φ 0, 0c⟩ + g2 0 2ℏω c ⟨Φ 0, 0c|(∆ ˆd(e) λ )2|Φ 0, 0c⟩ − 1 2 , (D.3) where ∆ ˆd(e) λ has been introduced in Eq.( 16). The first and second line vanish identically, when we evaluate the vacuum expectation value o...
-
[17]
is a product state, |R⟩ = |Φ 0⟩ ⊗ ˆUz |0c⟩, where the CS transformed cavity component can equivalently be written as ˆUz |0c⟩ = e− z2 λ 2 ∑ nc znc λ√ nc! |nc⟩ , (E.1) with CS-parameter, zλ , given in Eq.( 5). In the low- frequency limit, we find zλ → ∞ as ω c → 0 and therefore e− z2 λ 2 znc λ√ nc! → 0 , z λ → ∞ , (E.2) independent of the photon number, nc,...
-
[18]
Reversible Switching of Ultrastrong Light-Molecule Cou- pling
Schwartz, T.; Hutchison, J.A.; Genet, C.; Ebbesen, T.W. Reversible Switching of Ultrastrong Light-Molecule Cou- pling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 196405 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[19]
Modifying Chemical Landscapes by Cou- pling to Vacuum Fields
Hutchison, J.A.; Schwartz, T.; Genet, C.; Devaux, E.; Ebbesen, T.W. Modifying Chemical Landscapes by Cou- pling to Vacuum Fields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 1592 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[20]
Hybrid light-matter states in a molecular and material science perspective
Ebbesen, T.W. Hybrid light-matter states in a molecular and material science perspective. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2403 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[21]
Manipulat- ing matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields
Garcia-Vidal, F.J.; Ciuti, C.; Ebbesen, T.W. Manipulat- ing matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields. Science 373, 6551 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[22]
Time- dependent Kohn-Sham approach to quantum electrody- namics
Ruggenthaler, M.; Mackenroth, F.; Bauer, D. Time- dependent Kohn-Sham approach to quantum electrody- namics. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042107 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[23]
Time-dependent density functional theory for many-electron systems interacting with cavity pho- tons
Tokatly, I.V. Time-dependent density functional theory for many-electron systems interacting with cavity pho- tons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233001 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[24]
Ruggenthaler, M.; Flick, J.; Pellegrini, C.; Appel, H.; Tokatly, I.V.; Rubio, A. Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic structure theory. Phys. Rev. A 90, 012508 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[25]
Flick, J.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Appel, H.; Rubio, A. Kohn- Sham approach to quantum electrodynamical densit- functional theory: Exact time-dependent effective poten- tials in real space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 15285 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[26]
Ground-State Quantum-Electrodynamical Density-Functional Theory
Ruggenthaler, M. Ground-state quantum- electrodynamical density-functional theory. arXiv preprint arXiv.1509.01417v2 (2017)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[27]
Coupled cluster theory for molecular polari- tons: Changing ground and excited states
Haugland, T.; Ronca, E.; Kjønstad, E.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H. Coupled cluster theory for molecular polari- tons: Changing ground and excited states. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041043 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[28]
Polaritonic coupled-cluster the- ory
Mordovina, U.; Bungey, C.; Appel, H.; Knowles, P.J.; Rubio, A.; Manby, F.R. Polaritonic coupled-cluster the- ory. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023262 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[29]
Intermolecular interactions in optical cavities: An ab initio QED study
Haugland, T.; Schäfer, C.; Ronca, E.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H. Intermolecular interactions in optical cavities: An ab initio QED study. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 094113 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[30]
DePrince III, A. Eugene. Cavity-modulated ionization potentials and electron affinities from quantum electro- dynamics coupled-cluster theory. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 094112 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[31]
McTague, J.; Foley IV, J.J. Non-Hermitian cavity quan- tum electrodynamics-configuration interaction singles approach for polaritonic structure with ab initio molecu- lar Hamiltonians. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 154103 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[32]
Molec- ular orbital theory in cavity QED environments
Riso, R.R.; Haugland, T.S.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Molec- ular orbital theory in cavity QED environments. Nat. Commun. 13, 1368 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[33]
Bauer, M.; Dreuw, A. Perturbation theoretical ap- proaches to strong light-matter coupling in ground and excited electronic states for the description of molecular polaritons. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 124128 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[34]
Schnappinger, T.; Sidler, D.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A., Kowalewski, M. Cavity Born-Oppenheimer Hartree- Fock Ansatz: Light-Matter Properties of Strongly Cou- pled Molecular Ensembles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 8024 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[35]
Cou- pled cluster cavity Born-Oppenheimer approximation for electronic strong coupling
Angelico, S.; Haugland, T.S.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Cou- pled cluster cavity Born-Oppenheimer approximation for electronic strong coupling. J. Chem. Phys. 159, 214112 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[36]
Cui, Z.-H.; Mandal, A.; Reichman, D.R. Variational Lang-Firsov Approach Plus Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory with Applications to Ab Initio Polariton Chem- istry. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 1143 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[37]
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Complete Active Space Configuration Interaction Theory
Vu, N.; Mejia-Rodriguez, D.; Bauman, N.P.; Panyala, A.; Mutlu, E.; Govind, N.; Foley IV, J.J. Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Complete Active Space Configuration Interaction Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 1214 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[38]
Fischer, E.W. Cavity-modified local and non-local elec- tronic interactions in molecular ensembles under vibra- tional strong coupling. J. Chem. Phys. 161, 164112 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[39]
Diagrams in Polaritonic Cou- pled Cluster Theory
Monzel, L.; Stopkowicz, S. Diagrams in Polaritonic Cou- pled Cluster Theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 9572 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[40]
Matoušek, M.; Vu, N.; Govind, N. Foley IV, J.J.; Veis, L. Polaritonic Chemistry Using the Density Matrix Renor- malization Group Method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 9424 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[41]
Strong Coupling Møller-Plesset Perturba- tion Theory
El Moutaoukal, Y.; Riso, R.R.; Castagnola, M.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Strong Coupling Møller-Plesset Perturba- tion Theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 3981 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[42]
Fischer, E.W. Cavity Born-Oppenheimer Coupled Clus- ter Theory: Towards Electron Correlation in the Vibra- tional Strong Light-Matter Coupling Regime. J. Chem. Theory Comput. (2025)
work page 2025
-
[43]
A Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field approach for molecules in QED environments
Alessandro, R.; Castagnola, M.; Koch, H.; Ronca, E. A Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field approach for molecules in QED environments. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 6862 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[44]
Liebenthal, M.D.; Nam, V.; DePrince III, A.E. Assess- ing the Effects of Orbital Relaxation and the Coherent- State Transformation in Quantum Electrodynamics Den- sity Functional and Coupled-Cluster Theories. J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 5264 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[45]
Roden, P.; Foley IV, J.J. Perturbative analysis of the coherent state transformation in ab initio cavity quantum electrodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 161, 194103 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[46]
Understanding the polari- tonic ground state in cavity quantum electrodynamics
Haugland, T.S.; Philbin, J.P.; Ghosh, T.K.; Chen, M.; Koch, H.; Narang, P. Understanding the polari- tonic ground state in cavity quantum electrodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 162, 194106 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[47]
Flick, J.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Appel, H.; Rubio, A. Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry. PNAS 114, 3026 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[48]
Cavity Born-Oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron-nuclear-photon systems
Flick, J.; Appel, H.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A. Cavity Born-Oppenheimer approximation for correlated electron-nuclear-photon systems. J. Chem. Theory Com- put. 13, 1616, (2017)
work page 2017
-
[49]
Fischer, E.W.; Saalfrank, P. Beyond Cavity Born- Oppenheimer: On Nonadiabatic Coupling and Effective Ground State Hamiltonians in Vibro-Polaritonic Chem- istry. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 7215 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[50]
Schäfer, C.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rokaj, V.; Rubio, A. Rel- evance of the quadratic diamagnetic and self-polarization 9 terms in cavity quantum electrodynamics. ACS Photon- ics 7, 975 (2020)
work page 2020
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.