Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Analytic force-free jet from disk-fed rotating black holes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs a new analytic force-free jet model for a slowly rotating black hole fed by a magnetized disk, to first order in spin, and shows that its power and effective resistance are essentially independent of where the disk's c

desk verdict Genuinely new analytic BZ jet with a real but fixable gap: the inner/outer matching of the promoted Schwarzschild seed is 'presumed' rather than proven, and that is the thing to check before leaning on the jet power. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.21865 v3 pith:DCGYRCKG submitted 2026-02-25 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Luis Villarin , Ian Vega This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE PACS 04.70.-s
keywords force-freeelectrodynamicsblackholejetsBlandford-Znajekmechanismanalyticjetsolutionasymptoticallyparabolicfielddisk-fedslowlyrotatingKerrvacuumfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Black-hole jets are usually studied numerically, and fully analytic force-free jet solutions are scarce. Force-free electrodynamics is the regime in which plasma inertia and pressure are negligible next to the electromagnetic field, so the magnetosphere is described by the field structure alone. This paper builds a new analytic solution by deriving a flat-space vacuum magnetic field—an asymptotically parabolic field sourced by a thin disk with a current concentration—promoting it to a Schwarzschild background, and applying the standard spin-perturbation method of Blandford and Znajek. The resulting first-order-in-spin jet has angular velocity equal to half the horizon angular velocity on the axis (falling to zero on the last field line), a power of roughly 2.2×10^-2 X_H^2 Ω_H^2, and an effective resistance of about 0.74. The central claim is that these properties barely change when the disk parameter is varied, suggesting a universality of slowly rotating black-hole jets with respect to disk structure.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is a new flat-space vacuum field: the asymptotically parabolic flux function v1 = u√(ρ² − d²u²)/(1 + √(1−u²)), generated by rotating the hyperbolic vacuum tetrad in the poloidal plane. This seed is expanded near the origin and at infinity, and the modes are mapped one-by-one to Schwarzschild radial functions through the canonical mode-mode correspondence, with a relative normalization C fixed by matching the inner and outer series at θ=π/4 at the radius of convergence d*. This promoted flux then seeds a first-order Blandford-Znajek perturbation; the two free functions of the jet—angular velocity Ω_F and current I—are fixed by the Znajek horizon regularity condition and th

What would settle it

Sum the inner and outer series of the promoted Schwarzschild flux function at r = d* for several polar angles (e.g., θ = π/6, π/3, 3π/8) with enough terms to overcome the slow k^-3/2 convergence; if the difference does not vanish as more terms are included, the seed is invalid. Alternatively, a fully nonlinear force-free simulation of a slowly spinning black hole with the same disk current distribution could test whether the analytic Ω_F and power are reproduced and whether they depend on the disk current radius.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A new force-free jet solution is constructed for a slowly rotating black hole, valid to first order in spin. Its seed is a newly derived flat-space vacuum field, the asymptotically parabolic field, obtained by an improper Lorentz rotation of the hyperbolic vacuum tetrad and sourced by a thin disk with a current concentration and sign reversal. The seed is promoted to Schwarzschild spacetime via the canonical mode-mode mapping; the Znajek horizon condition and the parabolic asymptotic condition I = ±2 Ω_F ψ at infinity fix the angular velocity and current. The jet has Ω_F = Ω_H/2 on the axis, vanishing on the last field line, power P ≈ 2.2×10^-2 X_H^2 Ω_H^2, and effective resistance R_eff ≈ 0

Load-bearing premise

The entire construction rests on the assumption that the inner and outer mode expansions of the promoted Schwarzschild seed match to form a single global vacuum solution at all polar angles—the paper verifies the matching only at θ=π/4 and relies on 'presumed continuity'; if the series do not agree elsewhere, the seed is not a genuine Schwarzschild vacuum field and the jet construction collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The jet power per hemisphere is P ≈ 2.2×10^-2 X_H^2 Ω_H^2 at fixed horizon flux X_H and horizon angular velocity Ω_H; the corresponding effective resistance is R_eff ≈ 0.74.
  • The angular velocity is maximal on the axis (Ω_F = Ω_H/2) and decreases monotonically to zero at the last field line, which therefore slips through the disk and may form a current sheet separating the jet from a disk wind.
  • Varying the disk current location from the innermost stable orbit to infinity leaves Ω_F, I, and the power nearly unchanged at fixed horizon flux, indicating that slowly rotating black-hole jet power is insensitive to disk structure.
  • When the seed strength X_0 is held fixed instead, the horizon flux X_H shrinks as the disk moves outward, so the absolute jet power does depend on the disk; universality holds only at fixed horizon flux.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A similar tetrad-rotation construction applied to other vacuum seeds might produce further analytic jet solutions, including stellar magnetospheres; the paper's 'unphysical' dipolar field, with its caustic current divergence, may actually be relevant to pulsar-like settings rather than black holes.
  • If the disk-parameter insensitivity persists at higher order in spin, it would explain why the Blandford-Znajek power at low spin appears degenerate across different gravity theories and disk models; computing the second-order correction would be a direct test.
  • The model's jet boundary is approximately parabolic from a few to 10^5 gravitational radii, matching the observed M87* jet boundary in shape; fitting the model's boundary to the M87* image would be a concrete observational extension.
  • A nonlinear force-free numerical simulation with the same thin-disk current distribution could check whether the first-order analytic profiles for Ω_F and I—including the vanishing on the last field line—survive beyond perturbation theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an analytic force-free jet solution around a slowly rotating Kerr black hole fed by a thin magnetized disk. It first derives two new stationary, axisymmetric vacuum fields in flat spacetime by applying a poloidal Lorentz transformation to the tetrad of the hyperbolic field, identifying the asymptotically parabolic one as physically viable. This seed is promoted to Schwarzschild spacetime through the mode-mode mapping of Ref. [23], and then used in the Blandford-Znajek perturbative expansion to first order in spin. Imposing the Znajek horizon condition and the parabolic asymptotic condition I = ±2 Ω_F ψ at infinity fixes the angular velocity and current profiles. The main reported results are Ω_F/Ω_H = 1/2 on the polar axis, vanishing Ω_F and I on the last jet field line, jet power P ≈ 2.2×10^-2 X_H^2 Ω_H^2, effective resistance R_eff ≈ 0.74, and near-independence of these quantities from the disk current-concentration radius d_*.

Significance. If the construction is globally valid, this is a valuable new member of the very small family of analytic disk-fed black-hole jet solutions, and it provides a concrete test of the claimed universality of Blandford-Znajek power at low spin. The paper has real strengths: the flat-space derivation is explicit and systematic, the disk current sources are computed rather than assumed, the Znajek condition and the asymptotic condition (54) are external, established constraints rather than fitted parameters, and the jet properties are given in closed or semianalytic form. However, the central claim rests on a load-bearing global-matching step that the authors themselves describe as 'presumed.' The present manuscript therefore establishes a conditional construction rather than a fully verified solution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B / Sec. IV A] The global validity of the promoted seed ψ is the load-bearing step. The inner and outer series (B1)-(B2) are matched at r = d_* with one normalization C, but the authors verify the match only at θ = π/4 (Fig. 3) and explicitly write in Appendix B: 'We have therefore relied on the presumed continuity of the solutions in any circumstances from this example.' This is insufficient: if ψ_< and ψ_> disagree at any angle on r = d_*, the piecewise field carries a surface magnetic monopole layer and does not solve the Schwarzschild stream equation (25) in a neighborhood of the matching surface. The subsequent BZ perturbation, Eqs. (64)-(66), the power formula (68), and the resistance (71) all inherit this seed. The authors need either an analytic proof that the asymptotic forms imply matching for all θ, or a numerically controlled check over the full sphere with quantified truncation error. As i
  2. [Sec. IV B / Appendix C] The last-field-line angle θ_* is obtained numerically from a truncated sum of ∂θψ at the horizon. Appendix B notes that the series converges only as k^{-3/2}, yet Appendix C uses the first ten terms. The subsequent claims that α(d_*→∞) ≈ α(d_*=r_ISCO) ≈ 2.6, and hence that Ω_F and I are largely d_*-insensitive, depend on the accuracy of this truncation. The authors should quantify the error, for example by varying the truncation order and showing convergence of θ_*, α, and the resulting power. Without this, the universality claim is numerically plausible but not established to the precision implied by Eqs. (68) and (71).
  3. [Sec. IV B, last field line] For d_* = r_ISCO, the computed Ω_F and I on the last jet field line are nonzero, and the authors state that this is an artifact of the approximation and that the exact values should vanish for any d_*. But if the model as constructed does not enforce Ω_F = 0 on the boundary field line, that line is part of the jet solution and contributes to the integral in Eq. (67). The claim that the power is 'practically the same' should be checked with the boundary value actually produced by Eqs. (64)-(66), or the boundary should be explicitly excluded with a statement of why this does not affect the reported power.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (49)] The outer surface current is written with H(ρ−b), but the parameter b has not been defined; from the context it should be H(ρ−d).
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (B29)] The truncated expression for C gives C ≈ 0.964 in the M→0 limit, where exact matching would require C → 1. This indicates a ~4% truncation error in C; the authors should state how this uncertainty propagates into the numerical determination of θ_* and α.
  3. [Fig. 3] The matching is shown for a single value d_* = 6M with M = 2. A second panel for a very different d_* (e.g., d_* → ∞ or d_* near the horizon) would make the 'presumed continuity' claim more credible.
  4. [Sec. IV C, Eq. (68)] The text states that Eq. (68) accounts only for the northern hemisphere. This should be stated immediately after the equation, since a reader may otherwise interpret P as the total jet power from both hemispheres.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BZ jet properties follow from external Znajek and parabolic-asymptotic constraints; the flagged Appendix B matching gap is a validity concern, not a circular step.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain. The flat-space seed (Eqs. 38-41) is constructed by solving the geometric condition (20) for the tetrad rotation; the Schwarzschild promotion uses the mode-mode mapping of Ref. [23], which is external prior work, not the authors' own unpublished premise. The BZ first-order construction (Sec. IV) leaves W and Y free, and the two determining equations are the Znajek horizon condition (Eq. 53) and the parabolic asymptotic condition I=±2Ω_F ψ at infinity (Eq. 54); both are imposed external constraints, not outputs of the paper. The angular velocity W, current Y, power P≈2.2×10^-2 X_H^2 Ω_H^2, and R_eff≈0.74 are then algebraic consequences (Eqs. 64-71), with no free parameter fitted to the claimed jet properties. The d*-insensitivity is an emergent numerical observation (Fig. 2, Appendix C), not encoded in the ansatz. There are no self-citations: the cited Refs. [19], [23], [31] have no author overlap with Villarin and Vega. I do flag the paper's own admission in Appendix B: 'We have therefore relied on the presumed continuity of the solutions in any circumstances from this example, along with the qualitative verification of our expression of C.' This means the global validity of the promoted inner/outer seed at r=d* for all angles is not fully established; if that matching failed, the BZ construction would lack a valid seed. However, this is a correctness/existence gap, not circularity: the matching constant C is fixed by continuity at one angle and the flat-space normalization, and the subsequent Znajek/asymptotic conditions are independent external inputs. No step in the derivation reduces its claimed prediction to a fitted input or to a self-authored uniqueness theorem, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The 'asymptotically parabolic' and 'asymptotically dipolar' fields are new mathematical solutions within standard FFE, not new ontology. The main free choices are the physical disk radius d, the numerically approximated θ*, and the matching normalization C.

free parameters (3)
  • d (disk current-concentration/sign-reversal radius) = unrestricted; examples d*→∞ and d*=6M
    Parametrizes the seed vacuum solution and the disk current concentration. It is a physical model parameter, not fitted to data; the paper's central claim is that jet properties are insensitive to it at fixed X_H and Ω_H.
  • θ* (angle of the last jet field line at the horizon) = ≈54.7° (large d*) to ≈56.5° (flat-space ISCO estimate)
    Computed numerically from a 10-term truncated series (Appendix C). It enters α=csc²θ* secθ* (Eq. 60), which controls Ω_F and I through Eqs. (64)-(66); no error bars are supplied.
  • C (relative normalization of the inner promoted solution) = ≈0.964 in the M→0 limit
    Determined by approximate matching at θ=π/4 (Appendix B). It is not fitted to data but contributes uncertainty because the matching is only approximate.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Force-free electrodynamics is a valid description of a black hole magnetosphere, with degenerate, magnetically dominated fields.
    Used throughout; standard BZ framework introduced in Sec. II.A.
  • standard math Stationary, axisymmetric degenerate fields are fully characterized by (ψ, Ω_F, I) with I=I(ψ).
    Sec. II.C, Eq. (22), following Gralla-Jacobson.
  • standard math Vacuum stream equations (24)/(25) separate into the stated angular harmonics and radial functions, which form a complete orthogonal set.
    Sec. II.C; relies on Sturm-Liouville theory and hypergeometric function identities.
  • domain assumption The canonical mode-mode mapping of Ref. [23] promotes flat vacuum solutions to Schwarzschild by replacing r^{l+1}→R_l^< and r^{-l}→R_l^>, yielding a unique global solution.
    Sec. II.C and Sec. IV.A; load-bearing because the jet seed is this promoted field.
  • domain assumption For asymptotically parabolic fields, the BZ perturbation is consistent when I=±2Ω_F ψ at infinity (Eq. 54), as established in Ref. [39].
    Used in Sec. IV.B to fix W and Y; not re-derived.
  • domain assumption The Znajek horizon regularity condition (Eq. 53) holds and total current is conserved between horizon and infinity.
    Standard horizon regularity from Ref. [18], used to determine the current functions.
  • ad hoc to paper The inner and outer promoted series match at the radius of convergence d*, so the promoted flux is globally continuous.
    Appendix B: authors verify only at θ=π/4 and state they 'relied on the presumed continuity' otherwise.
  • ad hoc to paper The last-field-line angle θ* is well approximated by arctan(√2) in the large-d* limit and by the 10-term numerical root near ISCO.
    Appendix C; enters α and hence W, Y, and the claimed d*-insensitivity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analytic force-free jet from disk-fed rotating black holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DCGYRCKG

@misc{pith2026260221865,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analytic force-free jet from disk-fed rotating black holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DCGYRCKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.21865}
}
read the original abstract

We present a new analytic model of a force-free electromagnetic jet launched from a disk-fed rotating black hole. The jet solution is force-free to first order in the black hole spin and is obtained through a systematic construction based on previously developed analytical methods. The black hole jet modeled here exhibits an asymptotically parabolic structure and is parametrized by the location of the current concentration and sign reversal on the thin magnetized disk in the equatorial plane. We find that the jet properties show negligible dependence on the disk parameter, suggesting a possible universality of slowly rotating black hole jets with respect to disk structure. Our jet model reproduces the key features expected from the Blandford-Znajek mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.21865 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Poloidal magnetic field lines corresponding to (a) asymptotically parabolic and (b) asymptotically dipolar fields around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Angular velocity (blue) and current (red) of the field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Inner (blue) and outer (orange) magnetic flux evalu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [23]

    R. L. Znajek, Black hole electrodynamics and the Carter tetrad, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.179, 457 (1977)

    1977

  2. [1]

    (B27) of Gralla

    Radius of convergence The asymptotic behavior of the odd-langular solution ask→ ∞is provided in Eq. (B27) of Gralla. The cor- responding even-langular solution is obtained by settinga= 1/2,b= 0,c= 3/2,λ=k, andz= 1−2 cos 2 θin Eq. (B4), θ2k(θ) k→∞ ∼ − 1 2 √ 2k Γ(k+ 1) Γ(k+ 3 2 ) eiθ sinθ√ 1−e 2iθ [(−e−2iθ )k+1/2 −(−e −2iθ )−k].(B5) This asymptotic expressi...

  3. [2]

    We expect that, in Schwarzschild background, the correc- tion due to the black hole appears at the same order in rH /d◦ in the limitd ◦ ≫r H

    +O(l 2).(62) The correction appears at second order inland higher. We expect that, in Schwarzschild background, the correc- tion due to the black hole appears at the same order in rH /d◦ in the limitd ◦ ≫r H . Thus, we may approximate θ◦ ≃arctan ( √

  4. [3]

    (60) in the large-d ◦ limit

    in Eq. (60) in the large-d ◦ limit. However, the location at which the reversal of the disk current and the current concentration is most likely to happen is not far from the horizon, due to possible in- teresting dynamics between the strong gravitational and electromagnetic forces acting on the plasma in this re- gion. Such an interaction may also be the...

  5. [4]

    Moreover, the numerical computation shows thatθ ◦ is close toθ flat ◦ whend ◦ is far from the horizon

    in the limitd ◦ → ∞, in agreement with our previous assumption. Moreover, the numerical computation shows thatθ ◦ is close toθ flat ◦ whend ◦ is far from the horizon. The physical intuition behind this is that, since the last jet field line is also tied to the disk, the flux value of the last field line remains close to its flat- spacetime counterpart whe...

  6. [5]

    √ 2 α −1 + (1−α)ζ 3 2 # χ , ∞X n=2 ceven n = α2 2√π

    Normalization constant Now that we have already established the convergence of the solutions, we determine the normalization constant in the inner solution by enforcing continuity at the common radius of convergence. In principle, the normalization constant should be independent ofθ. Hence, we fix the angle atθ=π/4, and obtain a rapidly convergent summati...

  7. [6]

    T. M. Heckman and G. Kauffmann, The coevolution of galaxies and supermassive black holes: A local perspec- tive, Science333, 182 (2011)

    2011

  8. [7]

    Alexander and R

    D. Alexander and R. Hickox, What drives the growth of 18 black holes?, New Astronomy Reviews56, 93 (2012)

    2012

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Webster, J

    B. Webster, J. H. Croston, B. Mingo, R. D. Baldi, B. Barkus, G. G¨ urkan, M. J. Hardcastle, R. Mor- ganti, H. J. A. R¨ ottgering, J. Sabater, T. W. Shimwell, C. Tasse, and G. J. White, A population of galaxy-scale jets discovered using LOF AR, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astr...

    2020

  2. [9]

    Aleksi´ c, E

    J. Aleksi´ c, E. A. Alvarez, L. A. Antonelli, P. Antoranz, M. Asensio, M. Backes, J. A. Barrio, D. Bastieri, J. Be- cerra Gonz´ alez, and Bednarek, W. et al., MAGIC obser- vations of the giant radio galaxy M87 in a low-emission state between 2005 and 2007, A&A544, A96 (2012)

    2005

  3. [10]

    Feng and Q

    J. Feng and Q. Wu, Constraint on the black hole spin of M87 from the accretion-jet model, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society470, 612 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance, Astron. Astrophys. 24, 337 (1973)

    1973

  5. [12]

    Narayan, B

    R. Narayan, B. Paczynski, and T. Piran, Gamma-ray bursts as the death throes of massive binary stars, Astro- phys. J. Lett.395, L83 (1992), arXiv:astro-ph/9204001

    1992 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Collaboration, K

    The E.H.T. Collaboration, K. Akiyama, J. C. Algaba, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, R. Anantua, K. Asada, R. Azu- lay, A.-K. Baczko, D. Ball, and Balokovi´ c, Mislav et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. VIII. Mag- netic field structure near the event horizon, The Astro- phy...

    2021

  7. [14]

    Goddi, I

    C. Goddi, I. Mart ´ ı-Vidal, H. Messias, G. C. Bower, A. E. Broderick, J. Dexter, D. P. Marrone, M. Moscibrodzka, H. Nagai, and Algaba, Juan Carlos et al., Polarimet- ric properties of Event Horizon Telescope targets from ALMA, Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L14 (2021)

    2021

  8. [15]

    M. A. Abramowicz and P. C. Fragile, Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory, Living Rev. Rel.16, 1 (2013), arXiv:1104.5499 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Frank, A

    J. Frank, A. King, and D. Raine,Accretion Power in As- trophysics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  10. [17]

    Liska, A

    M. Liska, A. Tchekhovskoy, and E. Quataert, Large-scale poloidal magnetic field dynamo leads to powerful jets in GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion with toroidal field, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.494, 3656 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Tchekhovskoy, R

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, Ef- ficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested ac- cretion on a rapidly spinning black hole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.418, L79 (2011)

    2011

  12. [19]

    Kim and E

    Y. Kim and E. R. Most, General relativistic magnetized Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion with a spin-field mis- alignment: Jet nutation, polarity reversals, and Magnus drag, Phys. Rev. D111, 083025 (2025)

    2025

  13. [20]

    R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic ex- traction of energy from Kerr black holes., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.179, 433 (1977)

    1977

  14. [21]

    S. S. Komissarov, Blandford-Znajek mechanism versus Penrose process, J. Korean Phys. Soc.54, 2503 (2009)

    2009

  15. [22]

    Goldreich and W

    P. Goldreich and W. H. Julian, Pulsar Electrodynamics, Astrophys. J.157, 869 (1969)

    1969

  16. [24]

    Adhikari, G

    R. Adhikari, G. Menon, and M. V. Medvedev, Nonnull and force-free electromagnetic configurations in Kerr ge- ometry, Phys. Rev. D109, 024015 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    T. D. Brennan, S. E. Gralla, and T. Jacobson, Ex- act solutions to force-free electrodynamics in black hole backgrounds, Classical and Quantum Gravity30, 195012 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Menon, Force-free currents and the Newman-Penrose tetrad of a Kerr black hole: Exact local solutions, Phys

    G. Menon, Force-free currents and the Newman-Penrose tetrad of a Kerr black hole: Exact local solutions, Phys. Rev. D92, 024054 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    V. S. Beskin,MHD Flows in Compact Astrophysical Ob- jects: Accretion, Winds and Jets, Astronomy and Astro- physics Library (Springer, 2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    S. E. Gralla, A. Lupsasca, and M. J. Rodriguez, Electro- magnetic jets from stars and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044038 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Tanabe and S

    K. Tanabe and S. Nagataki, Extended monopole solution of the Blandford-Znajek mechanism: Higher order terms for a Kerr parameter, Phys. Rev. D78, 024004 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    Grignani, T

    G. Grignani, T. Harmark, and M. Orselli, Existence of the Blandford-Znajek monopole for a slowly rotating Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D98, 084056 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Camilloni, O

    F. Camilloni, O. J. Dias, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, R. Oliveri, M. Orselli, A. Placidi, and J. E. Santos, Blandford-Znajek monopole expansion revisited: novel non-analytic contributions to the power emission, Jour- nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(07), 032

  24. [32]

    Uchida, Theory of force-free electromagnetic fields

    T. Uchida, Theory of force-free electromagnetic fields. I. General theory, Phys. Rev. E56, 2181 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    Uchida, Theory of force-free electromagnetic fields

    T. Uchida, Theory of force-free electromagnetic fields. II. Configuration with symmetry, Phys. Rev. E56, 2198 (1997)

    1997

  26. [34]

    S. E. Gralla and T. Jacobson, Spacetime approach to force-free magnetospheres, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 2500 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Menon, The non-null and force-free electromagnetic field, Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 145018 (2021)

    G. Menon, The non-null and force-free electromagnetic field, Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 145018 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Comp` ere, S

    G. Comp` ere, S. E. Gralla, and A. Lupsasca, Force-free foliations, Phys. Rev. D94, 124012 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    V. S. Beskin, Axisymmetric stationary flows in compact astrophysical objects, Physics-Uspekhi40, 659 (1997)

    1997

  30. [38]

    K. S. Thorne, R. H. Price, and D. A. Macdonald,Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm(Yale University Press, 1986)

    1986

  31. [39]

    K. S. Thorne and D. A. Macdonald, Electrodynamics in curved spacetime: 3+1 formulation, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.198, 339 (1982)

    1982

  32. [40]

    D. A. Uzdensky, Force-free magnetosphere of an accretion disk - Black hole system. 2. Kerr geometry, Astrophys. J.620, 889 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    J. F. Mahlmann, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, and M. A. Aloy, Nu- merically solving the relativistic Grad-Shafranov equa- tion in Kerr spacetimes: Numerical techniques, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.477, 3927 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    M. H. P. M. van Putten and A. Levinson, Theory and astrophysical consequences of a magnetized torus around a rapidly rotating black hole, Astrophys. J.584, 937 (2003)

    2003

  35. [43]

    Armas, Y

    J. Armas, Y. Cai, G. Comp` ere, D. Garfinkle, and S. E. Gralla, Consistent Blandford-Znajek expansion, J. Cos- mol. Astropart. Phys.2020(04), 009

    2020

  36. [44]

    Grignani, T

    G. Grignani, T. Harmark, and M. Orselli, Force-free elec- trodynamics near rotation axis of a Kerr black hole, Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity37, 085012 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Parfrey, D

    K. Parfrey, D. Giannios, and A. M. Beloborodov, Black hole jets without large-scale net magnetic flux, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.446, L61 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Bransgrove, B

    A. Bransgrove, B. Ripperda, and A. Philippov, Mag- netic hair and reconnection in black hole magnetospheres, 19 Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 055101 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Ripperda, F

    B. Ripperda, F. Bacchini, and A. A. Philippov, Magnetic reconnection and hot spot formation in black hole accre- tion disks, Astrophys. J.900, 100 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    I. V. Igumenshchev, Magnetically arrested disks and the origin of poynting jets: A numerical study, The Astro- physical Journal677, 317 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Nakamura, K

    M. Nakamura, K. Asada, K. Hada, H.-Y. Pu, S. Noble, C. Tseng, K. Toma, M. Kino, H. Nagai, K. Takahashi, J.-C. Algaba, M. Orienti, K. Akiyama, A. Doi, G. Gio- vannini, M. Giroletti, M. Honma, S. Koyama, R. Lico, K. Niinuma, and F. Tazaki, Parabolic jets from the spin- ning blac...

    2018

  42. [50]

    J. Dong, N. Pati˜ no, Y. Xie, A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, C. F. Gammie, and N. Yunes, Blandford-Znajek process in quadratic gravity, Phys. Rev. D105, 044008 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Camilloni, T

    F. Camilloni, T. Harmark, M. Orselli, and M. J. Ro- driguez, Blandford-Znajek jets in MOdified gravity, Jour- nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(01), 047

  44. [52]

    M. Ruiz, C. Palenzuela, F. Galeazzi, and C. Bona, The role of the ergosphere in the Blandford–Znajek process, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.423, 1300 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    K. Toma, F. Takahara, and M. Nakamura, On the mech- anism of black hole energy reduction in the Bland- ford–Znajek process, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2025, 033E02 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Bateman and B

    H. Bateman and B. M. Project,Higher Transcendental Functions. Vol. I(McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1953)

    1953

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.