pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.00637 · v2 · pith:4OWEZOKKnew · submitted 2026-02-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

All-electron Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW for Molecules and Periodic Systems within the Numerical Atomic Orbital Framework

Bohan Jia , Min-Ye Zhang , Ziqing Guan , Huanjing Gong , Xinguo Ren This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 10:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords quasiparticle self-consistent GWnumerical atomic orbitalsall-electron calculationionization potentialquasiparticle band gapsemiconductorsGW approximationspace-time formalism
0
0 comments X

The pith

NAO-based quasiparticle self-consistent GW produces ionization potentials and band gaps consistent with reference implementations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an all-electron QSGW method inside the numerical atomic orbital framework for both molecules and periodic crystals. It combines a space-time formalism with localized resolution-of-identity to handle the two-electron integrals. The authors show that analytical continuation of the self-energy together with the Mode B self-consistency scheme produces stable quasiparticle spectra. Systematic tests on small molecules and on typical semiconductors and wide-gap insulators recover ionization potentials and band gaps that match results from established codes. The work thereby makes large-scale QSGW calculations feasible by inheriting the low-scaling properties already demonstrated for G0W0 in the same basis.

Core claim

We report an all-electron implementation of the quasiparticle self-consistent GW (QSGW) method for molecular and periodic systems within the framework of numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs). The implementation rests on the space-time formalism combined with the localized resolution-of-identity approximation. Analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix together with the Mode B QSGW scheme yields stable self-consistent quasiparticle energy spectra. Benchmark calculations on molecules and crystalline solids demonstrate that the resulting molecular ionization potentials and quasiparticle band gaps are consistent with reference values from established implementations.

What carries the argument

The NAO-based QSGW scheme that employs space-time formalism and localized resolution-of-identity to treat two-electron quantities while performing self-consistent quasiparticle updates.

If this is right

  • Molecular ionization potentials become accessible at the QSGW level with all-electron NAO accuracy.
  • Quasiparticle band gaps of semiconductors and wide-gap insulators match reference values from plane-wave or other established codes.
  • The low-scaling NAO infrastructure already used for G0W0 can now be applied to full QSGW calculations.
  • Large systems that were previously out of reach for self-consistent GW become computationally tractable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same NAO basis and resolution-of-identity machinery could be reused to embed QSGW corrections inside larger-scale hybrid or embedding schemes.
  • Extension to systems with hundreds of atoms would test whether the observed consistency with reference methods persists when system size increases.
  • Because the method is all-electron, it offers a direct route to core-level quasiparticle energies that are often approximated in pseudopotential codes.

Load-bearing premise

Analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix combined with the Mode B QSGW scheme produces stable self-consistent quasiparticle energy spectra.

What would settle it

A direct comparison on a small molecule or semiconductor where the self-consistent quasiparticle energies obtained with analytical continuation and Mode B diverge from or show larger errors than results from contour-deformation or other stable continuation methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.00637 by Bohan Jia, Huanjing Gong, Min-Ye Zhang, Xinguo Ren, Ziqing Guan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Workflow of the QS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Basis representation dependence tests of analytic con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Frequency grid convergence of the Si QS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. k-point convergence of the Si QS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Band gaps of semiconductors and insulators com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Band structure of MgO calculated using PBE (FHI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report an all-electron implementation of the quasiparticle self-consistent GW (QSGW) method for molecular and periodic systems within the framework of numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs), as implemented in the LibRPA software package. Our implementation is based on the space-time formalism, combined with the localized resolution-of-identity approximation to treat two-electron quantities. We found that analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix, in combination with the ``Mode B" QSGW scheme, can yield stable self-consistent quasiparticle energy spectra. Systematic benchmark calculations on molecules and crystalline solids (including typical semiconductors and wide-gap insulators) demonstrate that our NAO-based QSGW scheme yields molecular ionization potentials and quasiparticle band gaps for periodic solids that are consistent with reference results from established implementations. Our work opens the way for large-scale QSGW calculations, taking advantage of the NAO-based low-scaling algorithm previously developed for the G0W0 method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an all-electron implementation of quasiparticle self-consistent GW (QSGW) for molecules and periodic systems using numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs) within the LibRPA package. It employs the space-time formalism together with a localized resolution-of-identity approximation for two-electron integrals. The authors state that analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix combined with the Mode B QSGW scheme produces stable self-consistent quasiparticle spectra, and they present systematic benchmarks on molecular ionization potentials and quasiparticle band gaps of semiconductors and wide-gap insulators that are consistent with results from established reference codes. The work emphasizes the potential for large-scale calculations via the low-scaling NAO algorithm previously developed for G0W0.

Significance. If the implementation and benchmarks are robust, the approach would enable efficient all-electron QSGW calculations on larger molecular and periodic systems, extending the reach of parameter-free quasiparticle methods in materials science. The combination of NAO basis sets with space-time techniques and localized RI is a concrete technical contribution that could be adopted by other codes.

major comments (1)
  1. §4 (Benchmark calculations) and the discussion of self-consistency: the assertion that analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix with Mode B yields stable spectra is central to the reliability of the reported quasiparticle energies, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics such as number of iterations to convergence, sensitivity of final eigenvalues to the fitting range or number of poles in the continuation, or direct comparison against contour-deformation or real-frequency evaluations for the same systems. For wide-gap insulators, where the self-energy frequency structure is pronounced, small continuation artifacts could propagate through the self-consistent loop and affect the claimed consistency with reference results.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from explicit numerical error bars or mean absolute deviations for the benchmarked ionization potentials and band gaps rather than the qualitative statement of 'consistency'.
  2. Notation for the localized RI approximation and the precise definition of Mode B should be cross-referenced to the earlier G0W0 paper to avoid ambiguity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the validation of our self-consistent procedure. We address the point in detail below and are happy to revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (Benchmark calculations) and the discussion of self-consistency: the assertion that analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix with Mode B yields stable spectra is central to the reliability of the reported quasiparticle energies, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics such as number of iterations to convergence, sensitivity of final eigenvalues to the fitting range or number of poles in the continuation, or direct comparison against contour-deformation or real-frequency evaluations for the same systems. For wide-gap insulators, where the self-energy frequency structure is pronounced, small continuation artifacts could propagate through the self-consistent loop and affect the claimed consistency with reference results.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative metrics would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add to §4 explicit data on the number of iterations to convergence for all benchmark systems, together with tests of the sensitivity of the final quasiparticle energies to the fitting range and the number of poles retained in the analytical continuation. These checks confirm rapid convergence (typically fewer than ten iterations) and only weak dependence on the continuation parameters for the systems studied, including wide-gap insulators. Direct side-by-side comparisons with contour-deformation or real-frequency evaluations are not currently feasible within our space-time implementation; however, the close agreement of our results with multiple independent reference codes that employ different frequency treatments provides supporting evidence that continuation artifacts remain small. We will include a brief discussion of this point in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: implementation benchmarked against independent references

full rationale

The paper reports an all-electron NAO-based implementation of the established QSGW method using the space-time formalism and localized RI approximation. The central results consist of benchmark comparisons showing that molecular IPs and solid quasiparticle gaps are consistent with outputs from independent, established QSGW codes. No equations or procedures reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter defined from the same data, nor does any load-bearing step rest on a self-citation chain whose validity is presupposed by the present work. The prior NAO-G0W0 algorithm is cited only as a computational building block; the QSGW self-consistency and stability claims are validated externally rather than by construction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The implementation rests on standard domain assumptions of the GW approximation and the validity of the localized resolution-of-identity and analytical continuation techniques; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The space-time formalism combined with localized resolution-of-identity accurately treats two-electron quantities in the NAO basis.
    Invoked as the foundation of the implementation for both molecular and periodic systems.
  • domain assumption Analytical continuation of the self-energy matrix with Mode B QSGW yields stable quasiparticle spectra.
    Stated as the chosen route to self-consistency without further proof in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1349 out tokens · 53926 ms · 2026-05-22T10:45:28.064780+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Start with an initial guess for the effective potential V xc, usually taken from a preceding DFT calcula- tion

    work page

  2. [2]

    Construct the effective HamiltonianH QSGW using the currentV xc and solve the eigenvalue problem to obtain the QSGWorbitalsψ p(r) and eigenvalues ϵp. 4

    work page

  3. [3]

    Build the non-interacting Green’s functionG 0 from the QSGWorbitals and eigenvalues

    work page

  4. [4]

    Calculate the self-energy Σ(r,r ′, ω) using the GWapproximation based onG 0 as described in Eqs. (2)–(6)

    work page

  5. [5]

    Update the effective potentialV xc using the chosen QSGWmode (A or B) to obtain a new static and Hermitian approximation of the self-energy

    work page

  6. [6]

    If the change in the quasi- particle energies is below a predefined threshold, the calculation is considered converged

    Check for convergence. If the change in the quasi- particle energies is below a predefined threshold, the calculation is considered converged. Otherwise, return to step 2. The above-outlined QSGWscheme has been imple- mented in the LibRPA package [61, 63]. LibRPA was originally developed for the RPA correlation energy [63] and one-shotG 0W 0 calculations ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    NAO basis set representation First, the single-particle orbitals (KS orbitals in the initial iteration, or the QSGWorbitals in subsequent it- erations) are expanded in a basis of numerical atomic orbitals (NAOs): ψpk(r) = X i ci pkφik(r) (11) Here,c i pk are the expansion coefficients for thep-th state at Bloch wavevectorkin terms of the NAO basis. The Bl...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Localized resolution of identity technique For QSGW, we employ an auxiliary basis set to rep- resent the two-electron quantities and LRI to decompose the four-index tensors into three- and two-index ones, similar to the canonicalG 0W 0 implementation for peri- odic systems in FHI-aims [59] and our low-scaling RPA andG 0W 0 implementation in LibRPA [60, 61...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Mode A” or “Mode B

    Space-time formalism of QSGWwith NAO and LRI The non-interacting Green’s function in real space and imaginary time is expressed in the NAO basis as: G0(r,r ′,iτ) = X ij X R,R′ φiR(r)G0 ij(R′ −R,iτ)φ jR′(r′), (15) with the matrix elements given by G0 ij(R,iτ) = 1 Nk X pk e−ik·Rci pkcj∗ pkΞpk(τ),(16) 5 where Ξpk(τ) =e −(ϵpk−ϵF)τ [θ(τ)(1−f pk)−θ(−τ)f pk].(17...

    work page

  10. [10]

    tier 2” for H–Ne and “tier 1

    Basis sets For the benchmark calculations presented in this work, we adopt different basis sets for periodic solids and molecules. For periodic systems, we employ the intermediate gwsetting, which offers a practical com- promise between accuracy and computational cost for the present test set. For molecular systems, we use the really tightsetting, i.e., t...

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Going beyond theGWapproximation to include higher-order correlations [93] remains an active research direction

    and to other applications such as core-level binding energies [89], relativistic two-componentGW[90], mag- netic systems [91], and data-driven modeling [92]. Going beyond theGWapproximation to include higher-order correlations [93] remains an active research direction. Last but not least, our present QSGWis built upon the existing low-scalingG 0W 0 implem...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Physical Review136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  13. [13]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Physical Review140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  14. [14]

    Hedin, Physical Review139, A796 (1965)

    L. Hedin, Physical Review139, A796 (1965)

    work page 1965

  15. [15]

    Strinati, H

    G. Strinati, H. J. Mattausch, and W. Hanke, Physical Review B25, 2867 (1982)

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Physical Review B35, 5585 (1987)

    work page 1987

  17. [17]

    R. W. Godby, M. Schl¨ uter, and L. J. Sham, Physical Review B37, 10159 (1988)

    work page 1988

  18. [18]

    Aryasetiawan and O

    F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, Physical Review Letters74(1995), 10.1103/physrevlett.74.3221

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.3221 1995

  19. [19]

    W. G. Aulbur, L. J¨ onsson, and J. W. Wilkins, inSolid State Physics, Vol. 54 (Elsevier, 2000) pp. 1–218

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Reviews of Modern Physics74, 601 (2002)

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Rinke, A

    P. Rinke, A. Qteish, J. Neugebauer, C. Freysoldt, and M. Scheffler, New Journal of Physics7, 126 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Marom, F

    N. Marom, F. Caruso, X. Ren, O. T. Hofmann, T. K¨ orzd¨ orfer, J. R. Chelikowsky, A. Rubio, M. Scheffler, and P. Rinke, Physical Review B86, 245127 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    The GW Compendium: A Practical Guide to Theoreti- cal Photoemission Spectroscopy.Frontiers in Chem- istry, 7, 2019

    D. Golze, M. Dvorak, and P. Rinke, Frontiers in Chem- istry7(2019), 10.3389/fchem.2019.00377

    work page doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00377 2019

  24. [24]

    Reining, WIREs Comput

    L. Reining, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.8, e1344 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    M. F. Lange and T. C. Berkelbach, J. Chem. Theory Comput.14, 4224 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  27. [27]

    Bruneval and M

    F. Bruneval and M. A. L. Marques, J. Chem. Theory Comput.9, 324 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    K¨ orzd¨ orfer and N

    T. K¨ orzd¨ orfer and N. Marom, Physical Review B86, 041110 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Chen and A

    W. Chen and A. Pasquarello, Physical Review B90, 165133 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    S. E. Gant, J. B. Haber, M. R. Filip, F. Sagredo, D. Wing, G. Ohad, L. Kronik, and J. B. Neaton, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 053802 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y. Shu, C. Xing, X. Chen, S. Sun, Y. Huang, and D. G. Truhlar, Journal of Chemical Theory and Com- putation18, 3523 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Ku and A

    W. Ku and A. G. Eguiluz, Physical Review Letters89 (2002), 10.1103/physrevlett.89.126401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.126401 2002

  33. [33]

    A. Stan, N. E. Dahlen, and R. van Leeuwen, Europhysics Letters (EPL)76, 298 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Rostgaard, K

    C. Rostgaard, K. W. Jacobsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Phys. Rev. B81(2010), 10.1103/physrevb.81.085103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.085103 2010

  35. [35]

    Caruso, P

    F. Caruso, P. Rinke, X. Ren, A. Rubio, and M. Scheffler, Physical Review B88, 075105 (2013). 13

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Caruso, P

    F. Caruso, P. Rinke, X. Ren, M. Scheffler, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. B86, 081102(R) (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    A. L. Kutepov, Phys. Rev. B94, 155101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    A. L. Kutepov, Phys. Rev. B95, 195120 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Shishkin and G

    M. Shishkin and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B75, 235102 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Grumet, P

    M. Grumet, P. Liu, M. Kaltak, J. Klimeˇ s, and G. Kresse, Physical Review B98, 155143 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Holm and U

    B. Holm and U. von Barth, Physical Review B57, 2108 (1998)

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Koval, D

    P. Koval, D. Foerster, and D. S´ anchez-Portal, Physical Review B89, 155417 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    M. Wen, V. Abraham, G. Harsha, A. Shee, K. B. Whaley, and D. Zgid, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computa- tion20, 3109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Maggio and G

    E. Maggio and G. Kresse, Journal of chemical theory and computation13, 4765 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    A. L. Kutepov, S. Y. Savrasov, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B80, 041103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Baym and L

    G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Physical Review124, 287 (1961)

    work page 1961

  47. [47]

    Baym, Physical Review127, 1391 (1962)

    G. Baym, Physical Review127, 1391 (1962)

    work page 1962

  48. [48]

    Shishkin, M

    M. Shishkin, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Physical re- view letters99, 246403 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    S. V. Faleev, M. van Schilfgaarde, and T. Kotani, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 126406 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    van Schilfgaarde, T

    M. van Schilfgaarde, T. Kotani, and S. Faleev, Physical Review Letters96, 226402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Kotani, M

    T. Kotani, M. Van Schilfgaarde, and S. V. Faleev, Phys- ical Review B76, 165106 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Marie and P.-F

    A. Marie and P.-F. c. Loos, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation19, 3943 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Cunningham, M

    B. Cunningham, M. Gr¨ uning, D. Pashov, and M. van Schilfgaarde, Phys. Rev. B108, 165104 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    A. L. Kutepov, Phys. Rev. B105, 045124 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    F¨ orster, J

    A. F¨ orster, J. Chem. Theory Comput.21, 767 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Sakakibara, T

    H. Sakakibara, T. Kotani, M. Obata, and T. Oda, Phys- ical Review B101, 205120 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    F¨ orster and L

    A. F¨ orster and L. Visscher, Physical Review B105, 125121 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    W. R. Lambrecht, C. Bhandari, and M. Van Schilf- gaarde, Physical Review Materials1, 043802 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    S. Das, J. E. Coulter, and E. Manousakis, Physical Re- view B91, 115105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Salas-Illanes, D

    N. Salas-Illanes, D. Nabok, and C. Draxl, Physical Re- view B106, 045143 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Deguchi, K

    D. Deguchi, K. Sato, H. Kino, and T. Kotani, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics55, 051201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    Lei and T

    J. Lei and T. Zhu, The Journal of Chemical Physics157, 214114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Obata, T

    M. Obata, T. Kotani, and T. Oda, Computational Ma- terials Science260, 114190 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Feyereisen, G

    M. Feyereisen, G. Fitzgerald, and A. Komornicki, Chem- ical physics letters208, 359 (1993)

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    Vahtras, J

    O. Vahtras, J. Alml¨ of, and M. Feyereisen, Chemical Physics Letters213, 514 (1993)

    work page 1993

  66. [66]

    Weigend, M

    F. Weigend, M. H¨ aser, H. Patzelt, and R. Ahlrichs, Chemical physics letters294, 143 (1998)

    work page 1998

  67. [67]

    F¨ orster and L

    A. F¨ orster and L. Visscher, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 7381 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    M. J. van Setten, F. Caruso, S. Sharifzadeh, X. Ren, M. Scheffler, F. Liu, J. Lischner, L. Lin, J. R. Deslippe, and S. G. Louie, J. Chem. Theory Comput.11, 5665 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    X. Ren, P. Rinke, V. Blum, J. Wieferink, A. Tkatchenko, A. Sanfilippo, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, New Journal of Physics14, 053020 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    X. Ren, F. Merz, H. Jiang, Y. Yao, M. Rampp, H. Led- erer, V. Blum, and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. Materials5, 013807 (2021), arXiv:2011.01400 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    R. Shi, P. Lin, M.-Y. Zhang, L. He, and X. Ren, Physical Review B109, 035103 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Low-scalinggwcalculation of quasi-particle energies within numerical atomic orbital framework,

    M.-Y. Zhang, P. Lin, R. Shi, M. Scheffler, and X. Ren, “Low-scalinggwcalculation of quasi-particle energies within numerical atomic orbital framework,” (2026), arXiv preprint, in preparation

    work page 2026

  73. [73]

    Ismail-Beigi, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 385501 (2017)

    S. Ismail-Beigi, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 385501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Shi, M.-Y

    R. Shi, M.-Y. Zhang, P. Lin, L. He, and X. Ren, Com- puter Physics Communications309, 109496 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    P. Lin, X. Ren, and L. He, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 3082 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Kaltak, J

    M. Kaltak, J. Klimeˇ s, and G. Kresse, Journal of Chem- ical Theory and Computation10, 2498 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    Azizi, J

    M. Azizi, J. Wilhelm, D. Golze, M. Giantomassi, R. L. Panad´ es-Barrueta, F. A. Delesma, A. Buccheri, A. Gu- lans, P. Rinke, C. Draxl, and X. Gonze, Journal of Open Source Software8, 5570 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    P. Lin, X. Ren, and L. He, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 222 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    P. Lin, Y. Ji, L. He, and X. Ren, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation21, 3394 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Vidberg and J

    H. Vidberg and J. Serene, Journal of Low Temperature Physics29, 179 (1977)

    work page 1977

Showing first 80 references.