pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.04352 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-04 · 💻 cs.RO · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

A Soft Robotic Demonstration in the Stratosphere

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords soft roboticsdielectric elastomer actuatorssilicone elastomersUV crosslinkingstratospherehigh altitude balloonsextreme environmentsspace-like conditions
0
0 comments X

The pith

New UV-crosslinked silicone dielectric elastomer actuators function reliably at 23.6 km altitude in the stratosphere.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a UV-light crosslinking method for silicone elastomers using a platinum catalyst to create dielectric elastomer actuators with improved resilience to extreme cold, heat, and low pressure. These actuators are tested in controlled lab conditions at -40°C, 120°C, and near-vacuum, showing better performance than standard acrylic and silicone materials. Two high-altitude balloon missions integrate the actuators into autonomous grippers and demonstrate successful operation up to 23.6 km elevation, below 0.05 atm, and at -55°C. A sympathetic reader would care because this shows soft robots can handle space-like conditions where rigid machines often fail, opening adaptable designs for changing environments.

Core claim

The central claim is that a crosslinking mechanism for silicone elastomers under ultraviolet light, using trimethyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)platinum(IV) as a catalyst to react hydrosilane to vinyl groups and form carbon-carbon bonds, produces dielectric elastomer actuators with exceptional electro-mechanical performance and material resilience. This enables fully autonomous systems with grippers that operate in stratospheric conditions. Two balloon missions carried out at elevations as high as 23.6 km, pressures below 0.05 atm, and temperatures of -55°C confirm the actuators function as a viable soft robotic technology under space-like extremes.

What carries the argument

UV-catalyzed crosslinking of silicone elastomers via carbon-carbon bond formation using a platinum catalyst, which produces resilient dielectric elastomer actuators that convert electrical energy into mechanical work across wide temperature and pressure ranges.

If this is right

  • The material maintains electro-mechanical performance across wider temperature and pressure extremes than acrylic or standard silicone elastomers.
  • Fully autonomous soft robotic grippers can be deployed in stratospheric and space-like environments.
  • The chemical building blocks and catalyst can be expanded to address adhesion and additive manufacturing challenges in silicones.
  • Soft robots become practical for missions where environmental parameters change unexpectedly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same material approach could support soft robots on actual orbital or planetary missions beyond balloon tests.
  • Combining the UV processing with 3D printing might allow in-situ fabrication of actuators in remote or harsh locations.
  • Further exposure to cosmic radiation during longer flights could reveal limits not captured in the current lab vacuum tests.

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory tests at extreme temperatures and vacuum accurately predict actuator performance during actual balloon ascent, descent, and radiation exposure without new failure modes.

What would settle it

A third balloon flight or ground simulation showing actuator stroke or force dropping more than 20 percent during ascent compared to pre-flight lab tests at -40°C and near-vacuum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04352 by Alexander White, Alexander Yin, Anatol Gogoj, Ang Leo Li, Codrin Tugui, Edward Pomianek, Mihai Duduta, Tirth Thakar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Demonstrations in extreme environments and key building blocks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Thermal and pressure resilience. (A) Stress vs. strain curve for a soft elastomer (CEx 2, with excess Block A) at -50°, 25° and 100 C°. (B) Electro-mechanical strain as a function of applied electric field for two elastomers (CEx2 - softer material made with excess Block A, and CEx4 - stiffer material made with excess Block B) at -50°, 25° and 100 C°. (C) Variation in the actuation strain for ten actuator … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Payload and mission parameters. (A) Computer aided design (CAD) of the payload from the second mission which showed actuator operation during flight. The payload composition is described including energy storage, power boosters, sensors and actuator payload.(B) Zoomed in view of the actuator payload, including the frames to support the two finger gripper components, and the ring supporting a single layer a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Operation at elevation and survivability. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Machines designed for operation in Space, as well as other extreme environments, need to be both resilient and adaptable when mission parameters change. Soft robots offer advantages in adaptability, but most lack resilience to the pressure and temperature extremes found as close as the Stratosphere. Dielectric elastomer actuators overcome some of those limitations when built as solid state compliant capacitors capable of converting electrical energy into mechanical work, but the elastomer resilience limits the device's operating window. Here we present a crosslinking mechanism for silicone elastomers under ultraviolet light using trimethyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)platinum(IV) as a catalyst to react hydrosilane to vinyl groups. The formation of carbon-carbon bonds enables fast processing under UV light and exceptional electro-mechanical performance in dielectric elastomer actuators. The material resilience advantage is demonstrated in controlled experiments at -40{\deg} and 120{\deg} C, as well as near vacuum, in comparison with state-of-the-art acrylic and silicone chemistries. Fully autonomous systems controlling grippers made with the novel silicone were integrated into payloads for high altitude balloon testing. Two stratospheric balloon missions were carried out and demonstrated DEAs as a viable soft robotic technology under space-like conditions (as high as 23.6 km elevation, at <0.05 atm and -55{\deg} C). The combinations of chemical building blocks and catalyst can be further expanded to address other challenges for silicones, including adhesion and additive manufacturing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a UV-light crosslinking mechanism for silicone elastomers using trimethyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)platinum(IV) as catalyst to form carbon-carbon bonds from hydrosilane and vinyl groups. This yields DEAs with improved electro-mechanical performance and resilience, shown in controlled lab tests at -40°C, 120°C, and near-vacuum versus acrylic and standard silicone materials. Autonomous gripper systems using the new material were integrated into payloads and flown on two stratospheric balloon missions reaching 23.6 km altitude (<0.05 atm, -55°C), with the authors claiming this demonstrates DEAs as viable soft robotic technology under space-like conditions. The work also notes potential for expanding the chemistry to adhesion and additive manufacturing.

Significance. If the central demonstration holds, the material advance could enable more reliable soft actuators for stratospheric and space applications where temperature and pressure extremes limit current elastomers, providing a concrete path from lab resilience tests to field deployment.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and (presumed) Results section: The manuscript states that two balloon missions 'demonstrated DEAs as a viable soft robotic technology' at 23.6 km, <0.05 atm and -55°C, yet reports no quantitative in-flight data (actuation logs, telemetry, success rates, or post-flight functional checks). This leaves the central viability claim unsupported by direct evidence from the dynamic flight profile, relying instead on static lab tests at fixed conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: temperature notation uses inconsistent formatting ('-40' vs. '-55' with LaTeX deg symbol); standardize to °C throughout.
  2. [Introduction] The comparison to 'state-of-the-art acrylic and silicone chemistries' would benefit from explicit citation of the specific prior materials and their performance metrics for direct side-by-side evaluation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments on our manuscript. We provide a point-by-point response to the major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and (presumed) Results section: The manuscript states that two balloon missions 'demonstrated DEAs as a viable soft robotic technology' at 23.6 km, <0.05 atm and -55°C, yet reports no quantitative in-flight data (actuation logs, telemetry, success rates, or post-flight functional checks). This leaves the central viability claim unsupported by direct evidence from the dynamic flight profile, relying instead on static lab tests at fixed conditions.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the abstract phrasing could be interpreted as claiming direct in-flight demonstration of actuation performance, which is not supported by quantitative data in the current manuscript. The balloon missions demonstrated the practical deployment of the DEA systems in the stratosphere, with the autonomous grippers integrated and the payloads successfully reaching 23.6 km. Post-flight analysis showed the systems remained operational. To address this, we will revise the abstract to read that the missions 'demonstrated the deployment of DEA-based soft robotic systems under space-like conditions', emphasizing that the performance resilience was shown in lab tests replicating the flight conditions. We will also add a section or clarification in the results on the flight outcomes, including any available success metrics from the missions. This revision will be made in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration with independent test results

full rationale

The paper describes synthesis of a UV-crosslinked silicone elastomer, lab characterization at fixed temperature and vacuum points, and integration into two stratospheric balloon payloads. No equations, parameter fits, or derivations are present that could reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. Claims rest on direct experimental outcomes (material performance data and flight hardware survival) rather than self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or renamed empirical patterns. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks of material testing and flight demonstration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The demonstration rests on standard assumptions about elastomer dielectric properties and balloon environmental conditions; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Silicone elastomers can be crosslinked via hydrosilane-vinyl reaction under UV with the given catalyst to form stable C-C bonds
    Invoked to explain the material's temperature and pressure resilience

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5577 in / 1125 out tokens · 41262 ms · 2026-05-15T16:50:07.454462+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Laschi, B

    C. Laschi, B. Mazzolai, and M. Cianchetti, 2016. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Science robotics, 1(1), p.eaah3690. doi: 10.1126/ scirobotics.aah3690

  2. [2]

    Ogawa, D

    Y . Ogawa, D. Ando, Y ., Sutou, and J/ Koike, 2016. A lightweight shape-memory magnesium alloy. Science, 353(6297), pp.368-370. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6524

  3. [3]

    Shepherd, F

    R.F. Shepherd, F. Ilievski, W. Choi, S.A. Morin, A.A. Stokes, A.D. Mazzeo, X. Chen, M. Wang, and G.M. Whitesides, 2011. Multigait soft robot. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 108(51), pp.20400-20403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116564108

  4. [4]

    Y . Shi, E. Askounis, R. Plamthottam, T. Libby, Z. Peng, K. Youssef, J. Pu, R. Pelrine, and Q. Pei, 2022. A processable, high-performance dielectric elastomer and multilayering process. Science, 377(6602), pp.228-232. doi: 10.1126/science.abn0099

  5. [5]

    Kim, G.A

    Y . Kim, G.A. Parada, S. Liu, and X. Zhao, 2019. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Science robotics, 4(33), p.eaax7329. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aax7329

  6. [6]

    Huang, M

    F. Huang, M. Weng, Z. Feng, X. Li, W. Zhang, and . Chen. Transparent photoactuators based on localized-surface-plasmon-resonant semiconductor nanocrystals: A platform for camouflage soft robots. Nanoscale, 12(22):11878–11886, 2020. Doi: /10.1039/D0NR00812E

  7. [7]

    Nemitz, P

    M.P. Nemitz, P. Mihaylov, T.W. Barraclough, D. Ross, and A.A. Stokes. Using voice coils to actuate modular soft robots: Wormbot, an example. Soft Robotics, 3(4):198–204, Dec

  8. [8]

    Doi: 10.1089/soro.2016.0009

  9. [9]

    Bartlett, M.T

    W. Bartlett, M.T. Tolley, J.T. Overvelde, J.C. Weaver, B. Mosadegh, K. Bertoldi, G.M. Whitesides, and R.J. Wood. A 3d printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science, 349 (6244):161–165, Jul 2015. Doi: 10.1126/science.aab0129

  10. [10]

    Tolley, Robert F

    Michael T. Tolley, Robert F. Shepherd, Bobak Mosadegh, Kevin C. Galloway, Michael Wehner, Michael Karpelson, Robert J. Wood, and George M. Whitesides. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robotics, 1(3):213–223, Sep 2014

  11. [11]

    Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs,

    K.C. Galloway, K.P. Becker, B.Phillips, J. Kirby, S. Licht, D. Tchernov, R.J. Wood, and D.F. Gruber. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robotics, 3(1):23–33, Mar 2016. Doi: 10.1089/soro.2015.0019

  12. [12]

    G. Li, X. Chen, F. Zhou, Y . Liang, Y .Xiao, X. Cao, Z. Zhang, M.Zhang, B. Wu, S. Yin, and et al. Self powered soft robot in the mariana trench. Nature, 591(7848):66–71, Mar 2021. Doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03153-z

  13. [13]

    Pelrine, R

    R. Pelrine, R. Kornbluh, Q. Pei, and J. Joseph, 2000. High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. Science, 287(5454), pp.836-839. doi: 10.1126/ science.287.5454.836

  14. [14]

    Poulin, S

    A. Poulin, S. Rosset, and H.R. Shea,. Printing low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Applied Physics Letters, 107(24), (2015). Doi: 10.1063/1.4937735

  15. [15]

    Duduta, E

    M. Duduta, E. Hajiesmaili, H. Zhao, R.J. Wood, and D.R. Clarke. Realizing the potential of dielectric elastomer artificial muscles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7):2476–2481, Jan 2019. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815053116

  16. [16]

    Zhang, P

    Y . Zhang, P. Li, J. Quan, L. Li, G. Zhang, and D. Zhou. Progress, challenges, and prospects of soft robotics for space applications. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 5(3), Jun

  17. [17]

    Doi: 10.1002/aisy.202200071

  18. [18]

    Duduta, F

    M. Duduta, F. Berlinger, R. Nagpal, D.R. Clarke, R. J. Wood, and F. Z. Temel. Tunable multi-modal locomotion in soft dielectric elastomer robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(3):3868–3875, 2020. Doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.2983705

  19. [19]

    Araromi, I

    O.A. Araromi, I. Gavrilovich, J. Shintake, S. Rosset, M. Richard, V . Gass, and H.R. Shea, Rollable multisegment dielectric elastomer minimum energy structures for a deployable microsatellite gripper. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 20(1), pp.438-446, 2014. Doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2014.2329367

  20. [20]

    A soft and bistable gripper with adjustable energy barrier for fast capture in space

    Yuhang Liu, Kai Luo, Shuai Wang, Xiaodong Song, Zhijuan Zhang, Qiang Tian, and Haiyan Hu. A soft and bistable gripper with adjustable energy barrier for fast capture in space. Soft Robotics, 10(1):77–87, Feb 2023. Doi: 10.1089/soro.2021.0147

  21. [21]

    Duduta, R.J

    M. Duduta, R.J. Wood, and D.R. Clarke, Multilayer dielectric elastomers for fast, programmable actuation without prestretch. Adv. Mater, 28(36), pp.8058-8063 (2016). doi: 10.1002/adma.201601842

  22. [22]

    and Clarke, D.R

    Zhao, H., Hussain, A.M., Duduta, M., V ogt, D.M., Wood, R.J. and Clarke, D.R.. Compact dielectric elastomer linear actuators. Advanced functional materials, 28(42), p.1804328. (2018), doi: 10.1002/adfm.201804328

  23. [23]

    Hajiesmaili and D.R

    E. Hajiesmaili and D.R. Clarke. Dielectric elastomer actuators. Journal of Applied Physics, 129(15), Apr 2021. Doi: 10.1063/5.0043959

  24. [24]

    Jiang, C

    S. Jiang, C. Tang, X.J. Liu, and H. Zhao. Long-Life-Cycle and Damage-Recovery Artificial Muscles via Controllable and Observable Self-Clearing Process. Advanced Engineering Materials, 24(4), p.2101017, 2022, doi: 10.1002/adem.202101017

  25. [25]

    Y . Chen, H. Zhao, J. Mao, P. Chirarattananon, E.F. Helbling, N.S.P. Hyun, D.R. Clarke, and R.J. Wood. Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles. Nature, 575(7782), pp.324-329, 2019. Doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1737-7

  26. [26]

    X. Shi, J. Zou, P. Yan, W. Wan, B. Lu, G. Gu, and X. Zhu. Semiseparated biphasic bicontinuous dielectric elastomer for high-performance artificial muscle. Science, 390(6777), pp.1044-1049, 2025. Doi:10.1126/science.adr3521

  27. [27]

    A. Bele, M. Dascalu, C. Tugui, G.T. Stiubianu, C.D. Varganici, C. Racles, M. Cazacu, and A.L. Skov, Soft silicone elastomers exhibiting large actuation strains. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 139(22), p.52261, 2022. Doi: 10.1002/app.52261

  28. [28]

    W. Feng, L. Sun, Z. Jin, L. Chen, Y . Liu, H. Xu, and C. Wang, A large-strain and ultrahigh energy density dielectric elastomer for fast moving soft robot. Nature Communications, 15(1), p.4222, 2024. Doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48243-y

  29. [29]

    Marciniec

    B. Marciniec. ed., . Hydrosilylation: a comprehensive review on recent advances. 2009 Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8172-9_4

  30. [30]

    P. Hu, J. Madsen, and A.L. Skov. One reaction to make highly stretchable or extremely soft silicone elastomers from easily available materials. Nature communications, 13(1), p.370. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28015-2

  31. [31]

    Corcione, R

    C.E. Corcione, R. Striani, and M. Frigione, UV-cured methacrylic-silica hybrids: Effect of oxygen inhibition on photo-curing kinetics. Thermochimica Acta, 576, pp.47-55. 2014. Doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.11.028

  32. [32]

    Chakraborty, and M.D

    R. Chakraborty, and M.D. Soucek, Mechanical and film properties of telechelic methacrylic polysiloxanes with cycloaliphatic substituents groups for UV-curable applications. Silicon, 2(1), pp.61-69. 2010. Doi: 10.1007/s12633-010-9036-9

  33. [33]

    T. Zhao, R. Yu, S. Li, X. Li, Y . Zhang, X. Yang, X. Zhao, C. Wang, Z. Liu, R. Dou, and W. Huang, Superstretchable and processable silicone elastomers by digital light processing 3D printing. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 11(15), pp.14391-14398. 2019. Doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b03156

  34. [34]

    Linford, and C.E

    R.L.Cicero, M.R. Linford, and C.E. Chidsey. Photoreactivity of unsaturated compounds with hydrogen-terminated silicon (111). Langmuir, 16(13), pp.5688-5695. 2000. Doi: 10.1021/la9911990

  35. [35]

    Zhang, G

    W. Zhang, G. Jiang, and K. Liao, Synthesis of a Novel Platinum Catalyst and Its Application in the Photoactivated Hydrosilylation Reaction. Silicon 16, 5613–5623 (2024). Doi: 10.1007/s12633-024-03103-8

  36. [36]

    Daniel, J

    W.F. Daniel, J. Burdyńska, M Vatankhah-Varnoosfaderani, K. Matyjaszewski, J. Paturej, M. Rubinstein, A.V . Dobrynin, and S.S. Sheiko, Solvent-free, supersoft and superelastic bottlebrush melts and networks. Nature materials, 15(2), pp.183-189, (2016). Doi: 10.1038/ nmat4508

  37. [37]

    deGroh III, C.C

    H.C. deGroh III, C.C. Daniels, J.A. Dever, S.K Miller, D.L. Waters, J.R. Finkbeiner, P.H. Dunlap, and B.M. Steinetz, Space environment effects on silicone seal materials (No. NASA/ TM-2010-216332). 2010

  38. [38]

    Branz, and A

    F. Branz, and A. Francesconi, Experimental evaluation of a Dielectric Elastomer robotic arm for space applications. Acta Astronautica, 133, pp.324-333, (2017). Doi: 10.1016/ j.actaastro.2016.11.007

  39. [39]

    Acome, S.K

    E. Acome, S.K. Mitchell, T.G. Morrissey, M.B. Emmett, C. Benjamin, M. King, M. Radakovitz, and C. Keplinger. Hydraulically amplified self-healing electrostatic actuators with muscle-like performance. Science, 359(6371), pp.61-65. (2018). Doi: 10.1126/ science.aao6139

  40. [40]

    Kellaris, V

    N. Kellaris, V . Gopaluni Venkata, G.M Smith, S.K.Mitchell, C. and Keplinger, Peano- HASEL actuators: Muscle-mimetic, electrohydraulic transducers that linearly contract on activation. Science Robotics, 3(14), p.eaar3276, (2018). Doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar3276

  41. [41]

    M. Rivera, . Elastomers in space and in other high vacuum environments. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 39(4), 1127–1140, (1966) https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3547123

  42. [42]

    Hiruta, N

    T. Hiruta, N. Hosoya, S. Maeda, and I. Kajiwara, Experimental validation of vibration control in membrane structures using dielectric elastomer actuators in a vacuum environment. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 191, p.106049, (2021). Doi: 10.1016/ j.ijmecsci.2020.10604

  43. [43]

    Johnson, L.D Montierth, J.R

    R.H. Johnson, L.D Montierth, J.R. Dennison, J.S. Dyer, and E.R. Lindstrom, Small-scale simulation chamber for space environment survivability testing. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 41(12), pp.3453-3458, (2013) Doi: 10.1109/TPS.2013.2281399

  44. [44]

    Craig Miller

    H. Craig Miller. Vacuum arcs. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 51(7): 1585–1594, (2023), doi: 10.1109/TPS.2023.3261779

  45. [45]

    Sun, and J.T

    Y .Li, Y . Sun, and J.T. Yeow. Nanotube field electron emission: Principles, development, and applications. Nanotechnology, 26(24):242001, (2015). Doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/24/242001

  46. [46]

    Shea, Influence of humidity, temperature and prestretch on the dielectric breakdown strength of silicone elastomer membranes for DEAs

    F.B.Albuquerque, and H. Shea, Influence of humidity, temperature and prestretch on the dielectric breakdown strength of silicone elastomer membranes for DEAs. Smart Materials and Structures, 29(10), p.105024, (2020). Doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aba5e3

  47. [47]

    Li, S Lee, H

    A. Li, S Lee, H. Shahsa, and M. Duduta. Real time high voltage capacitance for rapid evaluation of dielectric elastomer actuators. Soft Matter, 18(37):7123–7130, (2022) doi: 10.1039/D2SM00690A

  48. [48]

    A. Li, P. Cuvin, S. Lee, J. Gu, C. Tugui, and M. Duduta, Data-Driven Long-Term Energy Efficiency Prediction of Dielectric Elastomer Artificial Muscles. Advanced Functional Materials, 34(42), p.2406710, (2024), doi: 10.1002/adfm.202406710

  49. [49]

    Matysek, P

    M. Matysek, P. Lotz, and H. Schlaak. Lifetime investigation of dielectric elastomer stack actuators. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 18(1):89–96, (2011). 10.1109/TDEI.2011.5704497

  50. [50]

    Carpi, I

    F. Carpi, I. Anderson, S. Bauer, G. Frediani, G. Gallone, M. Gei, C. Graaf, C. Jean- Mistral, W. Kaal, G. Kofod, and M. Kollosche, Standards for dielectric elastomer transducers. Smart Materials and Structures, 24(10), p.105025, (2015). Doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105025

  51. [51]

    Katzschmann, J

    R.K. Katzschmann, J. DelPreto, R. MacCurdy, and D. Rus, Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Science Robotics, 3(16), p.eaar3449. (2018) doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar3449

  52. [52]

    A. Yin, M. Daeffler, R. Shomberg, S. Licht, and B. Phillips, A Predictable Design and Production Workflow for Field Deployable Underwater Soft Actuator Applications. In OCEANS 2024-Singapore (pp. 1-8). IEEE. (2024) Doi: 10.1109/ OCEANS51537.2024.10682325

  53. [53]

    All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials

    S. Klomchitcharoen, P. Wechakarn, T. Tangwattanasirikun, N. Smerwong, P. Netrapathompornkij, T. Chatmeeboon, N. Nangsue, V . Thitasirivit, K. Kaweewongsunthorn, S. Piyanopharoj, and P. Phumiprathet, High-altitude balloon platform for studying the biological response of living organisms exposed to near-space environments. Heliyon, 10(6). (2024) doi: 10.101...