Ultra-high frequency ultrasound imaging and quantification of microvascular flow in xenograft renal cell carcinoma in an avian chorioallantoic membrane model
Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:50 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Motion-compensated interframe subtraction enables ultra-high frequency ultrasound to quantify microvascular flow changes in CAM tumor models.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The authors show that their motion compensation plus interframe subtraction pipeline applied to ultra-high frequency ultrasound B-scan data isolates microvascular flow signals in CAM-based renal cell carcinoma xenografts. This produces blood flow metrics that are significantly lower in Sunitinib-treated tumors than in controls, and the method performs comparably to motion-compensated singular value decomposition filtering while requiring less computation and working with widely available systems.
What carries the argument
The motion-compensated interframe subtraction (MC+IS) pipeline, which first aligns frames to reduce tissue motion then subtracts them to suppress clutter and reveal flow signals in B-scan images.
If this is right
- Treated tumors exhibit measurable decreases in blood flow metrics that the pipeline can detect.
- The approach completes treatment response assessment in CAM PDX models on a timescale compatible with high-throughput screening.
- MC+IS achieves performance similar to SVD filtering but is simpler and less computationally demanding.
- The method can run on standard ultra-high frequency ultrasound systems using only B-scan data.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the pipeline holds across more tumor types, it could speed early testing of anti-vascular drugs on patient samples before larger animal studies.
- Implementation details such as thresholds and filter order need standardization to make results reproducible between labs.
- The method could extend to real-time monitoring of vascular changes in other superficial tumor models beyond renal cell carcinoma.
Load-bearing premise
That subtracting motion-compensated frames truly isolates microvascular flow signals rather than leftover motion artifacts or noise in the moving CAM model.
What would settle it
If independent validation such as optical fluorescence microscopy on the same tumors shows no actual reduction in vascular flow after treatment, or if the pipeline reports flow signals in static non-flow phantoms.
read the original abstract
Patient derived xenograft (PDX) tumor models initiated in avian chorioallantoic membranes (CAM) are under investigation to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic options with the objective of personalizing treatments. CAM PDXs paired with ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) imaging could potentially constitute prospective high throughput assays that can rapidly assess tumor volume and vascular response to therapy. To date, little work has been conducted to adapt and validate UHFUS flow imaging methods to CAM tumor models. Here we report the development and evaluation of an imaging pipeline for UHFUS detection of microvascular flow in a CAM tumor model using interframe subtraction (IS) to suppress tissue clutter. The IS pipeline included a tissue motion compensation (MC) stage prior to clutter filtering and was compared to a singular value decomposition (SVD) clutter filter. The performance was evaluated using UHFUS data acquired in phantom and in vivo Sunitinib-treated renal cell carcinoma. MC substantially reduced tissue motion effects. MC+IS was comparable to MC+SVD filtering at detecting flow within tumors. The results for both IS and SVD filters were dependent on the details of implementation. The UHFUS imaging methods detected a significant decrease in blood flow metrics in treated versus control tumors. An effective imaging pipeline was developed for the assessment of the treatment response of CAM PDX models in a clinically relevant timeframe. The MC+IS approach implemented on B-scan image derived data is less computationally intensive and can be used with widely available UHFUS systems.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents an imaging pipeline for ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) detection of microvascular flow in patient-derived xenograft renal cell carcinoma tumors on avian chorioallantoic membranes (CAM). It incorporates tissue motion compensation (MC) prior to interframe subtraction (IS) clutter suppression, compares MC+IS to MC+SVD filtering on phantom and in vivo data, and reports a statistically significant decrease in blood flow metrics in Sunitinib-treated versus control tumors, proposing the approach as a high-throughput assay for treatment response assessment.
Significance. If the reported flow reductions reliably capture microvascular changes rather than residual artifacts, the work provides a practical, computationally efficient UHFUS method adaptable to widely available systems for rapid evaluation of vascular response in CAM PDX models. The demonstration that MC visibly improves results and that MC+IS performs comparably to MC+SVD on identical data adds value for experimental oncology, though the noted dependence on implementation details limits immediate generalizability.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract and Results: The manuscript explicitly states that 'the results for both IS and SVD filters were dependent on the details of implementation' (thresholds, filter order), yet provides no quantitative sensitivity analysis, full parameter tables, or error bars on the reported flow metrics. This directly affects the load-bearing claim of a statistically significant treatment effect, as the observed group differences may be specific to the chosen (unspecified) settings.
- [Results] Methods/Results (in vivo arm): The central claim that MC+IS isolates true microvascular flow (and thereby detects genuine treatment-induced reductions) lacks independent in vivo ground truth in the motion-prone CAM environment. Validation rests on phantom data plus the drug-treatment comparison; without histology or alternative modality correlation, residual motion artifacts after compensation could produce spurious differences, especially given the acknowledged implementation sensitivity.
minor comments (3)
- Add a table or supplementary section listing exact parameter values (e.g., motion compensation thresholds, SVD singular-value cutoff, IS frame count) used for all reported results to enable reproducibility.
- Specify sample sizes (number of tumors/embryos per group) and exact statistical test details when claiming significance in the abstract and results to strengthen interpretation of the flow metric differences.
- Clarify in the discussion whether the MC+IS pipeline was applied to raw RF data or B-mode images, as the abstract mentions 'B-scan image derived data' but this affects computational claims.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the points raised regarding parameter sensitivity and validation limitations. Revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation of our findings while honestly acknowledging constraints on new data acquisition. Our point-by-point responses follow.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Results: The manuscript explicitly states that 'the results for both IS and SVD filters were dependent on the details of implementation' (thresholds, filter order), yet provides no quantitative sensitivity analysis, full parameter tables, or error bars on the reported flow metrics. This directly affects the load-bearing claim of a statistically significant treatment effect, as the observed group differences may be specific to the chosen (unspecified) settings.
Authors: We agree that the acknowledged dependence on implementation details requires quantitative support to substantiate the robustness of the reported treatment effect. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated sensitivity analysis subsection in the Results. This includes systematic variation of threshold values and filter orders for both IS and SVD approaches, full parameter tables, error bars on all flow metrics, and confirmation that the statistically significant reduction in blood flow metrics between Sunitinib-treated and control tumors remains consistent across a practical range of parameter choices. The exact parameters used for the primary results are now explicitly stated. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results] Methods/Results (in vivo arm): The central claim that MC+IS isolates true microvascular flow (and thereby detects genuine treatment-induced reductions) lacks independent in vivo ground truth in the motion-prone CAM environment. Validation rests on phantom data plus the drug-treatment comparison; without histology or alternative modality correlation, residual motion artifacts after compensation could produce spurious differences, especially given the acknowledged implementation sensitivity.
Authors: We acknowledge the absence of independent in vivo ground truth such as histology or alternative modality correlation for the CAM tumors. Our validation strategy combines quantitative phantom experiments demonstrating effective motion compensation and flow isolation with the observed statistically significant treatment effect. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the Discussion to explicitly address this limitation, the possibility of residual motion artifacts, and the implications of implementation sensitivity. No new histological data can be provided in this revision cycle, but we maintain that the phantom results plus the differential response to Sunitinib provide meaningful support for the pipeline's utility in assessing treatment effects. revision: partial
Circularity Check
No circularity: experimental pipeline validated on independent treatment data
full rationale
The manuscript describes an empirical imaging pipeline (MC+IS vs MC+SVD) applied to phantom and in-vivo CAM tumor datasets. Central results are direct measurements of blood-flow metrics showing a statistically significant decrease in the Sunitinib-treated arm versus controls. No equations derive a quantity from itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation to force the outcome. The comparison between filters is performed on the same acquired frames, and the treatment-effect claim rests on the biological intervention rather than on any self-referential construction. Minor self-citations to prior method papers exist but are not load-bearing for the reported group differences.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- motion compensation threshold or registration parameters
- clutter filter cutoff or singular-value threshold
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Interframe subtraction after motion compensation isolates microvascular flow from tissue clutter in B-mode UHFUS images.
- domain assumption The CAM xenograft model produces microvascular flow signals comparable to those in mammalian tumors for the purpose of treatment-response quantification.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
-
[2]
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Corresponding author: Emmanuel Chérin (emmanuel.cherin@sri.utoronto.ca) Sunnybrook Research Institute Physical Sciences (Room S638) 2075 Bayview Avenue Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada Phone: 416-480-6100, ext. 63277 Footnote: Sara Mar is a Precision Medicine Associate at AstraZeneca Ltd, Mississaug...
work page 2075
-
[3]
Non rigid frame registration was used to compensate in-plane motion
Tissue Motion Compensation Tissue motion might comprise either one or both in-plane and out-of-plane components. Non rigid frame registration was used to compensate in-plane motion. The displacement matrix of a given acquired frame was estimated relative to the first frame using ‘imregdemons’, a diffusion-like regularization method implemented in MATLAB (...
-
[4]
Interframe Subtraction Inspired from past work by our group [28] , an ’interframe’ clutter filtering approach was developed, based on the subtraction of frames acquired at the same imaging plane location in the CAM tumor at different times. In the case of stationary tissue, this operation removes tissue signals, and the remaining signals are associated so...
-
[5]
4 with 𝑦̅ the average over N clutter filtered frames 𝑦, where N= 630 − 𝑚 maximum
Speckle Temporal Variance The speckle temporal variance (referred to as speckle variance, SV, from here on) was estimated over slow time, post IS clutter filtering, in each pixel of the field of view: 𝑆𝑉 = 1 𝑁−1 ∑ (𝑦𝑛 − 𝑦̅)2𝑁 𝑛=1 Eq. 4 with 𝑦̅ the average over N clutter filtered frames 𝑦, where N= 630 − 𝑚 maximum. Only the IS clutter filtered frames 𝑦𝑛 ca...
-
[6]
UMI processing The principles of singular value decomposition involved in UMI for tissue clutter filtering can be found in Demené et al. [30]. In brief, this method allows the separation of highly spatially and temporally coherent signal (tissue signal, typically) from weakly coherent signal from moving scatterers (red blood cells or microbubbles). In the...
-
[7]
Interframe Time and Flow Velocity The relationship between interframe time (for IS clutter filtering), mean flow velocity and speckle variance was investigated in vitro using a flow phantom with a 1.5 mm diameter channel embedded an agar matrix (1% w/w, #281210, Difco Agar Technical) containing silicon dioxide particles (4% w/w, S5631-500G, Sigma-Aldrich)...
-
[8]
UHFUS Detection of individual Microvessels in CAM To provide an illustrative example of the capability of our UHFUS imaging method to detect individual microvessels of various diameters, speckle variance images were compared with brightfield optical images of a CAM vessel bed (without tumor) acquired at ED 14. Brightfield images (top view) were first acqu...
-
[9]
Data were processed with and without motion compensation, and either IS or SVD filtering
Effect of Tissue motion Compensation and Interframe Time in vivo A total of 36 UHFUS datasets collected from 12 CAM tumors at ED 16 were used to investigate the effects of motion compensation and IT in IS clutter filtering on CAM tumor microvasculature detection via speckle variance. Data were processed with and without motion compensation, and either IS ...
-
[10]
Sunitinib (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA) was dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Treatment protocol Twenty-two CAM tumors were randomly divided into control and treatment groups after three days of tumor growth (ED 11). Sunitinib (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA) was dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). A working concentration of 10 µM of sunitinib was prepared and aliquoted into 100 µL volumes. 100% DMSO was used as the vehi...
-
[11]
Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry and Histology Dylight 649 labelled Lens Culinaris Agglutinin (Vector Laboratories Inc., Newark, CA, USA), a lectin which binds the intraluminal surface of vessel endothelial walls [33] was diluted 1:10 with PBS prior to injection. After UHFUS imaging at ED 16, 100 µL of this diluted lectin was injected, under stereomicrosc...
-
[12]
Statistical Analysis The significance of the difference between data processing methods was determined using a paired t-test whereas the significance of the differences between groups of the treatment assay was evaluated using an unpaired t-test (both with = 0.05). Correlations with fluorescence immunochemistry findings were investigated using Pearson c...
-
[13]
Interframe Time and Flow Velocity The detection of a blood mimicking fluid flowing in a 1 mm vessel phantom was evaluated using speckle variance for a range of mean velocities from 0.1 to 15 mm/s. Examples of log-compressed speckle variance and power Doppler cross-section images of the vessel obtained after IS and SVD clutter filtering, respectively, are ...
-
[14]
UHFUS Detection of individual Microvessels in CAM A brightfield image and UHFUS images are compared in Figure 6, to assess the UHFUS detection of individual microvessels. Log-compressed speckle variance and power Doppler images obtained post IS (IT=18.7 ms and 74.8 ms) and SVD clutter filtering, respectively, depict vessels within the CAM that correspond ...
-
[15]
Effect of Tissue Motion Compensation and Interframe Time in vivo The effects of IT selection and tissue motion compensation on the detection of in vivo flow were investigated in the 12 non-treated tumors used for system evaluation. Speckle variance images of a tumor obtained with and without motion compensation and IS clutter filtering at various interfra...
-
[16]
could eventually be implemented to improve resolution to about capillary diameter and potentially measure blood velocity [43] in these small vessels, but at the cost of a significant increase in both hardware requirements and data acquisition and processing complexity. The manual tumor segmentation for volume measurements constitutes a limitation in the c...
-
[17]
DeBord LC, Pathak RR, Villaneuva M, Liu H-C, Harrington DA, Yu W, et al. The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as a versatile patient-derived xenograft (PDX) platform for precision medicine and preclinical research. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8: 1642–1660
work page 2018
-
[18]
Hu J, Ishihara M, Chin AI, Wu L. Establishment of xenografts of urological cancers on chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) to study metastasis. Precis Clin Med. 2019;2: 140–151
work page 2019
-
[19]
Tran TA, Leong HS, Pavia-Jimenez A, Fedyshyn S, Yang J, Kucejova B, et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Paracrine Signaling by Sunitinib-Resistant Renal Cell Carcinoma. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36: 1836–1855
work page 2016
-
[20]
Establishment of a ccRCC patient-derived chick chorioallantoic membrane model for drug testing
Charbonneau M, Harper K, Brochu-Gaudreau K, Perreault A, McDonald PP, Ekindi-Ndongo N, et al. Establishment of a ccRCC patient-derived chick chorioallantoic membrane model for drug testing. Front Med. 2022;9: 1003914
work page 2022
-
[21]
Sunitinib: the antiangiogenic effects and beyond
Hao Z, Sadek I. Sunitinib: the antiangiogenic effects and beyond. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9: 5495– 5505
work page 2016
-
[22]
Comandone A, Vana F, Comandone T, Tucci M. Antiangiogenic therapy in clear cell renal carcinoma (CCRC): Pharmacological basis and clinical results. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13: 5896
work page 2021
-
[23]
Catalano M, Procopio G, Sepe P, Santoni M, Sessa F, Villari D, et al. Tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoints inhibitors in favorable risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Trick or treat? Pharmacol Ther. 2023;249: 108499
work page 2023
-
[24]
Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Future Is Now
Deleuze A, Saout J, Dugay F, Peyronnet B, Mathieu R, Verhoest G, et al. Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Future Is Now. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. doi:10.3390/ijms21072532
-
[25]
Canil C, Kapoor A, Basappa NS, Bjarnason G, Bossé D, Dudani S, et al. Management of advanced kidney cancer: Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada (KCRNC) consensus update 2021. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15: 84–97
work page 2021
-
[26]
Improving immunotherapy outcomes with anti-angiogenic treatments and vice versa
Khan KA, Kerbel RS. Improving immunotherapy outcomes with anti-angiogenic treatments and vice versa. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15: 310–324
work page 2018
-
[27]
Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial
Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF, Redman BG, Kuzel TM, Harrison MR, et al. Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33: 1430–1437
work page 2015
-
[28]
Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373: 1803–1813
work page 2015
-
[29]
Yip SM, Wells C, Moreira R, Wong A, Srinivas S, Beuselinck B, et al. Checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Cancer. 2018;124: 3677–3683
work page 2018
-
[30]
McDermott DF, Drake CG, Sznol M, Choueiri TK, Powderly JD, Smith DC, et al. Survival, Durable Response, and Long-Term Safety in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33: 2013–2020
work page 2015
-
[31]
High-frequency Doppler ultrasound monitors the effects of antivascular therapy on tumor blood flow
Goertz D, Yu J, Kerbel R, Burns P, Foster F. High-frequency Doppler ultrasound monitors the effects of antivascular therapy on tumor blood flow. Cancer Res. 2002;62: 6371–6375. 17
work page 2002
-
[32]
Graham KC, Wirtzfeld LA, MacKenzie LT, Postenka CO, Groom AC, MacDonald IC, et al. Three- dimensional high-frequency ultrasound imaging for longitudinal evaluation of liver metastases in preclinical models. Cancer Res. 2005;65: 5231–5237
work page 2005
-
[33]
Vitiello M, Kusmic C, Faita F, Poliseno L. Analysis of Lymph Node Volume by Ultra-High- Frequency Ultrasound Imaging in the Braf/Pten Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Melanoma. J Vis Exp. 2021. doi:10.3791/62527
-
[34]
Martin KH, Lindsey BD, Ma J, Nichols TC, Jiang X, Dayton PA. Ex Vivo Porcine Arterial and Chorioallantoic Membrane Acoustic Angiography Using Dual-Frequency Intravascular Ultrasound Probes. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2015;42: 2294–2307
work page 2015
-
[35]
Lowerison MR, Willie CJ, Pardhan S, Power NE, Chambers AF, Leong HS, et al. Abstract B02: Ultrasound evaluation of anti-angiogenic therapy on patient-derived renal cell carcinoma xenograft tumors in the chicken embryo model. Mol Cancer Ther. American Association for Cancer Research
-
[36]
Lowerison MR. First-order statistical speckle models improve robustness and reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion estimates. PhD Thesis, The University of Western Ontario
-
[37]
Available: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4399
-
[38]
Eckrich J, Kugler P, Buhr CR, Ernst BP, Mendler S, Baumgart J, et al. Monitoring of tumor growth and vascularization with repetitive ultrasonography in the chicken chorioallantoic-membrane-assay. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 18585
work page 2020
-
[39]
Improved Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging Using Deconvolution with Total Variation Regularization
Lok U-W, Trzasko JD, Huang C, Tang S, Gong P, Kim Y, et al. Improved Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging Using Deconvolution with Total Variation Regularization. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47: 1089–1098
work page 2021
-
[40]
Huang C, Lowerison MR, Lucien F, Gong P, Wang D, Song P, et al. Noninvasive Contrast-Free 3D Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis with Ultrasensitive Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 4907
work page 2019
-
[41]
Baranger J, Arnal B, Perren F, Baud O, Tanter M, Demene C. Adaptive Spatiotemporal SVD Clutter Filtering for Ultrafast Doppler Imaging Using Similarity of Spatial Singular Vectors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37: 1574–1586
work page 2018
-
[42]
On the use of Singular Value Decomposition as a clutter filter for ultrasound flow imaging
Riemer K, Lerendegui M, Toulemonde M, Zhu J, Dunsby C, Weinberg PD, et al. On the use of Singular Value Decomposition as a clutter filter for ultrasound flow imaging. arXiv [physics.med- ph]. 2023. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2304.12783
-
[43]
Rausch M, Weiss A, Zoetemelk M, Piersma SR, Jimenez CR, van Beijnum JR, et al. Optimized Combination of HDACI and TKI Efficiently Inhibits Metabolic Activity in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Overcomes Sunitinib Resistance. Cancers . 2020;12. doi:10.3390/cancers12113172
-
[44]
In: FUJIFILM Visualsonics [Internet]
Digital RF-Mode. In: FUJIFILM Visualsonics [Internet]. [cited 9 Jan 2026]. Available: https://www.visualsonics.com/product/software/digital-rf-mode
work page 2026
-
[45]
Interframe clutter filtering for high frequency flow imaging
Needles A, Goertz DE, Cheung AM, Foster FS. Interframe clutter filtering for high frequency flow imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33: 591–600. 18
work page 2007
-
[46]
Volume flow measurement using Doppler and grey-scale decorrelation
Rubin JM, Tuthill TA, Fowlkes JB. Volume flow measurement using Doppler and grey-scale decorrelation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27: 101–109
work page 2001
-
[47]
Demene C, Deffieux T, Pernot M, Osmanski B-F, Biran V, Gennisson J-L, et al. Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering of Ultrafast Ultrasound Data Highly Increases Doppler and fUltrasound Sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34: 2271–2285
work page 2015
-
[48]
Andrewartha SJ, Tazawa H, Burggren WW. Embryonic control of heart rate: examining developmental patterns and temperature and oxygenation influences using embryonic avian models. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011;178: 84–96
work page 2011
-
[49]
Mortola JP, Wills K, Trippenbach T, Al Awam K. Interactive effects of temperature and hypoxia on heart rate and oxygen consumption of the 3-day old chicken embryo. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2010;155: 301–308
work page 2010
-
[50]
Selective binding of lectins to embryonic chicken vasculature
Jilani SM, Murphy TJ, Thai SNM, Eichmann A, Alva JA, Iruela-Arispe ML. Selective binding of lectins to embryonic chicken vasculature. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51: 597–604
work page 2003
-
[51]
Rapid contour detection for image classification
Rasche C. Rapid contour detection for image classification. IET Image Process. 2018;12: 532–538
work page 2018
-
[52]
Ultrasonic estimation of tissue perfusion: a stochastic approach
Adler RS, Rubin JM, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL, Pallister JE. Ultrasonic estimation of tissue perfusion: a stochastic approach. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21: 493–500
work page 1995
-
[53]
Singular value decomposition on GPU using CUDA
Lahabar S, Narayanan PJ. Singular value decomposition on GPU using CUDA. 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing. IEEE; 2009. pp. 1–10
work page 2009
-
[54]
Lok U-W, Song P, Trzasko JD, Daigle R, Borisch EA, Huang C, et al. Real time SVD-based clutter filtering using randomized singular value decomposition and spatial downsampling for micro-vessel imaging on a Verasonics ultrasound system. Ultrasonics. 2020;107: 106163
work page 2020
-
[55]
A fast block-matching motion estimation algorithm for H.264/AVC
Lixin Z, Xuecheng Z, Weizhong L. A fast block-matching motion estimation algorithm for H.264/AVC. 2006 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications. IEEE; 2006. pp. 1289– 1292
work page 2006
-
[56]
Alves de Mesquita J Jr, Bouskela E, Wajnberg E, Lopes de Melo P. Improved instrumentation for blood flow velocity measurements in the microcirculation of small animals. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;78: 024303
work page 2007
-
[57]
Vray D, Needles A, Yang VXD, Foster FS. High frequency b-mode ultrasound blood flow estimation in the microvasculature. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004. IEEE; 2005. doi:10.1109/ultsym.2004.1417763
-
[58]
Yang VXD, Needles A, Vray D, Lo S, Wilson BC, Vitkin IA, et al. High frequency ultrasound speckle flow imaging - comparision with doppler optical coherence tomography (DOCT). IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004. IEEE; 2005. doi:10.1109/ultsym.2004.1417760
-
[59]
Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging using the Erythrocytes: I: Density Images
Jensen JA, Naji MA, Praesius SK, Taghavi I, Schou M, Hansen LN, et al. Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging using the Erythrocytes: I: Density Images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2024;PP. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3411711
-
[60]
Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging Using the Erythrocytes: II: Velocity Images
Naji MA, Taghavi I, Schou M, Praesius SK, Hansen LN, Panduro NS, et al. Super Resolution Ultrasound Imaging Using the Erythrocytes: II: Velocity Images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2024;PP. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3411795 19
-
[61]
Schor-Bardach R, Alsop DC, Pedrosa I, Solazzo SA, Wang X, Marquis RP, et al. Does arterial spin- labeling MR imaging-measured tumor perfusion correlate with renal cell cancer response to antiangiogenic therapy in a mouse model? Radiology. 2009;251: 731–742
work page 2009
-
[62]
Contrasting effects of sunitinib within in vivo models of metastasis
Welti JC, Powles T, Foo S, Gourlaouen M, Preece N, Foster J, et al. Contrasting effects of sunitinib within in vivo models of metastasis. Angiogenesis. 2012;15: 623–641
work page 2012
-
[63]
Hara T, Miyake H, Hinata N, Fujisawa M. Inhibition of tumor growth and sensitization to sunitinib by RNA interference targeting programmed death-ligand 1 in mouse renal cell carcinoma RenCa model. Anticancer Res. 2019;39: 4737–4742
work page 2019
-
[64]
Bridgeman VL, Vermeulen PB, Foo S, Bilecz A, Daley F, Kostaras E, et al. Vessel co-option is common in human lung metastases and mediates resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in preclinical lung metastasis models: Vessel co-option in lung metastases. J Pathol. 2017;241: 362–374
work page 2017
-
[65]
Lichner Z, Saleeb R, Butz H, Ding Q, Nofech-Mozes R, Riad S, et al. Sunitinib induces early histomolecular changes in a subset of renal cancer cells that contribute to resistance. FASEB J. 2019;33: 1347–1359. Abbreviations: CAM: chorioallantoic membrane E: ultrasound signal envelope ED: embryonic day FA: relative fluorescent area FR: frame rate IQ: I (in-...
work page 2019
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.