arxiv: 2603.05734 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Magnetoelastic signatures of the conical state and charge density waves in antiferromagnetic FeGe

L. Prodan , J. Sourd , S. Zherlitsyn , L. Chioncel

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords FeGekagome antiferromagnetconical statecharge density wavesultrasoundmagnetoelastic effectsmagnetic stiffnessspin-lattice coupling

0 comments

The pith

Ultrasound measurements in FeGe reveal a field-tunable fluctuation scale at 35 K from the conical state and a field-independent one at 100 K from charge-density-wave fluctuations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study uses ultrasound to probe the magnetoelastic properties of the kagome antiferromagnet FeGe. It finds two separate temperature scales where fluctuations affect the lattice: a lower one around 35 K that shifts with applied magnetic field, connected to the conical arrangement of spins, and a higher one near 100 K that stays fixed, tied to charge density wave order. The softening of the magnetic stiffness, renormalized by exchange interactions, drives the changes in sound velocity and follows a quadratic dependence on the field strength as required by symmetry considerations. This establishes ultrasound as a direct way to monitor how magnetic stiffness influences the coupled spin and lattice dynamics in such systems.

Core claim

Ultrasound provides direct access to the exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness in antiferromagnetic FeGe. Its softening governs the acoustic anomaly and follows a symmetry-constrained quadratic field dependence. This identifies a field-tunable magnetic fluctuation channel at approximately 35 K associated with the conical state and a field-independent channel at approximately 100 K linked to charge-density-wave fluctuations. The results predict linear temperature dependence of neutron diffraction intensities at fixed field and quadratic field suppression at fixed temperature.

What carries the argument

Exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness accessed through ultrasound measurements, whose softening controls acoustic anomalies with quadratic magnetic field dependence.

If this is right

The softening of exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness governs the acoustic anomaly in FeGe.
Neutron diffraction intensities show linear temperature dependence at fixed magnetic field.
Neutron diffraction intensities exhibit quadratic suppression with increasing magnetic field at fixed temperature.
Magnetic stiffness serves as a central control parameter for spin-lattice dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Applying ultrasound to related kagome materials could separate magnetic and charge fluctuation contributions in similar systems.
The quadratic field dependence might enable external control of lattice responses in magnetic devices.
Combined ultrasound and neutron studies at varying fields would strengthen the assignment of the observed scales to specific states.

Load-bearing premise

The acoustic softening arises specifically from the exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness and the two observed temperature scales map directly onto the conical magnetic state and charge-density-wave fluctuations.

What would settle it

Observation of acoustic softening that does not follow the predicted quadratic field dependence or neutron intensities lacking the expected linear temperature or quadratic field dependence would falsify the link to magnetic stiffness and the assigned fluctuation channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.05734 by J. Sourd, L. Chioncel, L. Prodan, S. Zherlitsyn.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the relative sound [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Two-parameter scaling space spanned by ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Kagome systems host intertwined spin, charge, and lattice degrees of freedom that drive emergent collective states. Here, we identify two distinct energy scales in the noncollinear kagome magnet FeGe: a field-tunable magnetic fluctuation channel at $\sim 35$~K associated with the conical state, and a field-independent channel at $\sim 100$~K linked to charge-density-wave fluctuations. Ultrasound measurements provide direct access to the exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness, whose softening governs the acoustic anomaly and follows a symmetry-constrained quadratic field dependence. We further predict a linear temperature dependence of neutron diffraction intensities at fixed field and a quadratic field suppression at fixed temperature. These results identify magnetic stiffness as a key control parameter of spin-lattice dynamics and establish ultrasound as a sensitive probe of coupled collective modes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Ultrasound picks up two softening scales in FeGe that the authors assign to conical magnetism and CDW fluctuations, but the assignments rest on temperature matching and field dependence without direct order-parameter checks.

read the letter

The paper measures ultrasound velocity and attenuation in FeGe and reports acoustic softening at roughly 35 K that moves with applied field and at 100 K that stays put. They attribute the lower scale to exchange-renormalized stiffness in the conical state and the upper one to CDW fluctuations, then use symmetry to argue the field dependence must be quadratic. They also give explicit predictions for how neutron intensities should vary with temperature at fixed field and with field at fixed temperature. That is the concrete output: a set of magnetoelastic signatures tied to the known phases in this kagome antiferromagnet. The work is new in the sense that it applies the ultrasound method specifically to FeGe and extracts those two scales from the same dataset. The symmetry argument for the quadratic field term is clean and does not require extra fitting parameters. The predictions for neutron data are useful because they can be checked independently. The measurements themselves look reproducible in principle and build on established magnetoelastic techniques used in other magnets. The soft spot is the mapping itself. The assignments come from the observed temperatures lining up with literature values for the conical transition and CDW onset, plus the field tunability of only the lower scale. No simultaneous magnetization loops, neutron intensities, or CDW satellite intensities are shown at the same temperatures to lock the features down. Other possible sources for the softening, such as generic spin fluctuations or anharmonic lattice terms, are not excluded by quantitative comparison in the data presented. The central claim therefore stays inferential until those cross-checks appear. Readers working on kagome systems with multiple intertwined orders will find the experimental handle and the concrete predictions worth seeing. The paper is not a broad theoretical step but supplies a practical probe that others can apply. It is solid enough on the measurement side and the symmetry reasoning to deserve referee time, even if revisions will likely need more direct confirmation of the order parameters.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ultrasound measurements on the noncollinear kagome antiferromagnet FeGe that reveal two distinct temperature scales in the magnetoelastic response: a field-tunable acoustic anomaly near 35 K attributed to the conical magnetic state via softening of exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness, and a field-independent channel near 100 K linked to charge-density-wave fluctuations. The acoustic softening is stated to follow a symmetry-constrained quadratic field dependence. The authors further predict a linear temperature dependence of neutron diffraction intensities at fixed field and a quadratic field suppression of those intensities at fixed temperature, positioning magnetic stiffness as a central control parameter for spin-lattice coupling in the system.

Significance. If the assignments and the symmetry-constrained interpretation of the ultrasound data hold, the work would establish ultrasound as a sensitive probe of exchange-renormalized stiffness in kagome magnets with intertwined orders, offering a route to separate magnetic and charge-density-wave fluctuation channels without requiring direct order-parameter measurements in every experiment. The explicit, testable predictions for neutron intensities constitute a clear strength that could enable falsification or confirmation by independent groups.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and Results: The central mapping of the field-tunable ~35 K scale to the conical state (and the ~100 K scale to CDW fluctuations) rests on the observed acoustic softening and its quadratic field dependence alone. No quantitative fits, raw velocity or attenuation curves, error analysis, or explicit exclusion of alternative mechanisms (e.g., generic spin fluctuations or lattice anharmonicity) are referenced, leaving the assignments interpretive rather than directly anchored.
[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that ultrasound provides 'direct access' to exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness is not supported by a derivation or symmetry analysis in the provided text; the quadratic field dependence is asserted as symmetry-constrained, but the explicit symmetry operations or Landau expansion that enforce this form are not shown, making it impossible to verify that the dependence is parameter-free rather than fitted.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'two distinct energy scales' but does not specify whether these are extracted from peak positions, inflection points, or model fits; a brief statement of the extraction procedure would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript and supplementary information to incorporate additional data, fits, error analysis, and explicit derivations where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Results: The central mapping of the field-tunable ~35 K scale to the conical state (and the ~100 K scale to CDW fluctuations) rests on the observed acoustic softening and its quadratic field dependence alone. No quantitative fits, raw velocity or attenuation curves, error analysis, or explicit exclusion of alternative mechanisms (e.g., generic spin fluctuations or lattice anharmonicity) are referenced, leaving the assignments interpretive rather than directly anchored.

Authors: We agree that the main text would benefit from more explicit supporting material. In the revised version we have added the raw ultrasound velocity and attenuation curves versus temperature and magnetic field to the supplementary information, together with quantitative fits to the acoustic anomalies (including error bars from repeated measurements). We have also inserted a dedicated paragraph in the results section that excludes alternative mechanisms: lattice anharmonicity is field-independent and cannot account for the observed tunability, while generic spin fluctuations lack the specific quadratic field dependence that matches the conical-state boundary established by prior neutron diffraction. The field-independent 100 K scale is likewise inconsistent with magnetic fluctuations and aligns with the known CDW transition temperature. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that ultrasound provides 'direct access' to exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness is not supported by a derivation or symmetry analysis in the provided text; the quadratic field dependence is asserted as symmetry-constrained, but the explicit symmetry operations or Landau expansion that enforce this form are not shown, making it impossible to verify that the dependence is parameter-free rather than fitted.

Authors: We acknowledge that the symmetry analysis was only summarized rather than fully derived in the original text. The revised manuscript now contains an explicit derivation in a new supplementary section. Starting from the magnetoelastic free-energy expansion permitted by the D6h point-group symmetry of FeGe in the conical state, symmetry forbids a linear-in-B term in the stiffness renormalization; the leading allowed correction is quadratic in B. This functional form is fixed by symmetry and therefore parameter-free, while the prefactor remains material-dependent. The statement of 'direct access' follows from the coupled magnetoelastic equations of motion, in which the measured sound-velocity shift is directly proportional to the field-induced change in magnetic stiffness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: symmetry-constrained dependence and predictions remain independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The abstract derives the quadratic field dependence from symmetry constraints on the exchange-renormalized magnetic stiffness rather than from any fit to the ultrasound data. The stated predictions (linear T-dependence of neutron intensities at fixed field, quadratic field suppression at fixed T) follow directly from that stiffness model without reducing to a reparameterization of the observed acoustic anomaly or to any self-citation chain. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation is present in the reported derivation steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain-standard assumptions that acoustic velocity directly reports magnetic stiffness and that temperature/field scales map cleanly to conical and CDW order parameters; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Acoustic anomaly follows symmetry-constrained quadratic field dependence
Invoked to link softening to exchange-renormalized stiffness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5450 in / 1266 out tokens · 56440 ms · 2026-05-15T14:32:46.346586+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

am(T, H) = am0 + bT + αm H² ... χm^{-1}(T,H) ∝ [am(T,H)-ω0]² + Γ²(H)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

RG flow equations ẋm = xm + g xc; ẋc = xc + g xm ... eigen-directions x± = xm ± xc

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

Spin liquids in frustrated magnets,

Leon Balents, “Spin liquids in frustrated magnets,” Na- ture464, 199–208 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

Realization of the kagome spin ice state in a frustrated intermetallic com- pound,

Kan Zhao, Hao Deng, Hua Chen, Kate A. Ross, Vaclav Petˇ r´ ıˇ cek, Gerrit G¨ unther, Margarita Russina, Vladimir Hutanu, and Philipp Gegenwart, “Realization of the kagome spin ice state in a frustrated intermetallic com- pound,” Science367, 1218–1223 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

Easy-cone state medi- ating the spin reorientation in the topological kagome magnet Fe3Sn2,

L. Prodan, D. M. Evans, A. S. Sukhanov, S. E. Nikitin, A. A. Tsirlin, L. Puntigam, M. C. Rahn, L. Chioncel, V. Tsurkan, and I. K´ ezsm´ arki, “Easy-cone state medi- ating the spin reorientation in the topological kagome magnet Fe3Sn2,” Physical Review B111, 184442 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Frustrated charge density wave and quasi-long-range bond-orientational order in the mag- netic kagome fege,

D. Subires, A. Kar, A. Korshunov, C. A. Fuller, Yi Jiang, H. Hu, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, C. McMonagle, C. Yi, S. Roychowd- hury, W. Schnelle, C. Shekhar, J. Strempfer, A. Jana, I. Vobornik, J. Dai, M. Tallarida, D. Chernyshov, 6 A. Bosak, C. Felser, B. Andrei Bernevig, and S. Blanco-Canosa, “Frustrated charge density wave and quasi-long-range bond-orientational ...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58725-2 2025
[5]

Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic or- ders on a breathing kagom´ e lattice,

Max Hirschberger, Taro Nakajima, Shang Gao, Li- cong Peng, Akiko Kikkawa, Takashi Kurumaji, Markus Kriener, Yuichi Yamasaki, Hajime Sagayama, Hironori Nakao, Kazuki Ohishi, Kazuhisa Kakurai, Yasujiro Taguchi, Xiuzhen Yu, Taka-hisa Arima, and Yoshinori Tokura, “Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic or- ders on a breathing kagom´ e lattice,” Nat. Commun.10 ...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13675-4 2019
[6]

Magnetic and geometric control of spin textures in the itinerant kagome magnet Fe 3Sn2,

Markus Altthaler, Erik Lysne, Erik Roede, Lilian Pro- dan, Vladimir Tsurkan, Mohamed A. Kassem, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Stephan Krohns, Istv´ an K´ ezsm´ arki, and Dennis Meier, “Magnetic and geometric control of spin textures in the itinerant kagome magnet Fe 3Sn2,” Phys- ical Review Research3, 043191 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Chiral superconducting phase and chiral spin-density-wave phase in a hubbard model on the kagome lattice,

Shun-Li Yu and Jian-Xin Li, “Chiral superconducting phase and chiral spin-density-wave phase in a hubbard model on the kagome lattice,” Physical Review B85, 144402 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

CsV 3Sb5: A Z2 Topological Kagome Metal with a Superconducting Ground State,

Brenden R. Ortiz, Samuel M. L. Teicher, Yong Hu, Julia L. Zuo, Paul M. Sarte, Emily C. Schueller, A. M. Milinda Abeykoon, Matthew J. Krogstad, Stephan Rosenkranz, Raymond Osborn, Ram Seshadri, Leon Ba- lents, Junfeng He, and Stephen D. Wilson, “CsV 3Sb5: A Z2 Topological Kagome Metal with a Superconducting Ground State,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 247002 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

Giant Anomalous Hall Effect in the Chiral Antifer- romagnet Mn3Ge,

Naoki Kiyohara, Takahiro Tomita, and Satoru Nakat- suji, “Giant Anomalous Hall Effect in the Chiral Antifer- romagnet Mn3Ge,” Phys. Rev. Appl.5, 064009 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

Large anoma- lous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge,

Ajaya K. Nayak, Julia Erika Fischer, Yan Sun, Bing- hai Yan, Julie Karel, Alexander C. Komarek, Chandra Shekhar, Nitesh Kumar, Walter Schnelle, J¨ urgen K¨ ubler, Claudia Felser, and Stuart S. P. Parkin, “Large anoma- lous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge,” Sci. Adv.2 (2016), 10.1126/sciadv.1501870

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501870 2016
[11]

Large ordered moment with strong easy-plane anisotropy and vortex-domain pattern in the kagome ferromagnet Fe3Sn,

Lilian Prodan, Donald M. Evans, Sin´ ead M. Griffin, An- dreas ¨Ostlin, Markus Altthaler, Erik Lysne, Irina G. Fil- ippova, Sergiu Shova, Liviu Chioncel, Vladimir Tsurkan, and Istv´ an K´ ezsm´ arki, “Large ordered moment with strong easy-plane anisotropy and vortex-domain pattern in the kagome ferromagnet Fe3Sn,” Applied Physics Let- ters123(2023), 10.10...

work page doi:10.1063/5.0155295 2023
[12]

Av3sb5 kagome superconductors,

Stephen D. Wilson and Brenden R. Ortiz, “Av3sb5 kagome superconductors,” Nature Reviews Materials9, 420–432 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

Anisotropic charge transport in the easy-plane kagome ferromagnet Fe3Sn,

Lilian Prodan, Artem Chmeruk, Liviu Chioncel, Vladimir Tsurkan, and Istv´ an K´ ezsm´ arki, “Anisotropic charge transport in the easy-plane kagome ferromagnet Fe3Sn,” Physical Review B110, 094407 (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

Giant and anisotropic many-body spin–orbit tunability in a strongly correlated kagome magnet,

Jia-Xin Yin, Songtian S. Zhang, Hang Li, Kun Jiang, Guoqing Chang, Bingjing Zhang, Biao Lian, Cheng Xi- ang, Ilya Belopolski, Hao Zheng, Tyler A. Cochran, Su- Yang Xu, Guang Bian, Kai Liu, Tay-Rong Chang, Hsin Lin, Zhong-Yi Lu, Ziqiang Wang, Shuang Jia, Wenhong Wang, and M. Zahid Hasan, “Giant and anisotropic many-body spin–orbit tunability in a strongly ...

work page 2018
[15]

Nonequilibrium control of kagome metals,

Francesco Grandi, Ronny Thomale, and Dante M. Kennes, “Nonequilibrium control of kagome metals,” Journal of Materials Research39, 3183–3192 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

Uncon- ventional chiral charge order in kagome superconductor kv3sb5,

Yu-Xiao Jiang, Jia-Xin Yin, M. Michael Denner, Nana Shumiya, Brenden R. Ortiz, Gang Xu, Zurab Guguchia, Junyi He, Md Shafayat Hossain, Xiaoxiong Liu, Ja- cob Ruff, Linus Kautzsch, Songtian S. Zhang, Guoqing Chang, Ilya Belopolski, Qi Zhang, Tyler A. Cochran, Daniel Multer, Maksim Litskevich, Zi-Jia Cheng, Xian P. Yang, Ziqiang Wang, Ronny Thomale, Titus N...

work page 2021
[18]

Disentangling the intertwined orders in a magnetic kagome metal,

Ji Seop Oh, Ananya Biswas, Mason L. Klemm, Hengxin Tan, Yaofeng Xie, Bin Gao, Makoto Hashimoto, Donghui Lu, Binghai Yan, Pengcheng Dai, Robert J. Birgeneau, and Ming Yi, “Disentangling the intertwined orders in a magnetic kagome metal,” Science Advances11(2025), 10.1126/sciadv.adt2195

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adt2195 2025
[19]

Interacting spin and charge density waves in the kagome metal fege,

Mason L. Klemm, Tingjun Zhang, Barry L. Winn, Fankang Li, Feng Ye, Masaaki Matsuda, Avishek Maity, Sijie Xu, Xiaokun Teng, Yoshihiko Umemoto, Bin Gao, Ming Yi, and Pengcheng Dai, “Interacting spin and charge density waves in the kagome metal fege,” Physical Review B112(2025), 10.1103/d88l-4wq8

work page doi:10.1103/d88l-4wq8 2025
[20]

Magnetic phase diagram of hexagonal fege,

K Carrander, H Schwartz, and O Beckman, “Magnetic phase diagram of hexagonal fege,” Physica Scripta2, 313–315 (1970)

work page 1970
[21]

Magnetic phase diagram of hexagonal fege determined by neutron diffraction,

J Bernhard, B Lebech, and O Beckman, “Magnetic phase diagram of hexagonal fege determined by neutron diffraction,” Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics18, 539– 552 (1988)

work page 1988
[22]

Large anomalous Nernst effect and nodal plane in an iron-based kagome ferromagnet,

Taishi Chen, Susumu Minami, Akito Sakai, Yangming Wang, Zili Feng, Takuya Nomoto, Motoaki Hirayama, Rieko Ishii, Takashi Koretsune, Ryotaro Arita, and Satoru Nakatsuji, “Large anomalous Nernst effect and nodal plane in an iron-based kagome ferromagnet,” Sci. Adv.8(2022), 10.1126/sciadv.abk1480

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk1480 2022
[23]

Discovery of a long-ranged charge or- der with 1/4 Ge1-dimerization in an antiferromagnetic Kagome metal,

Ziyuan Chen, Xueliang Wu, Shiming Zhou, Jiakang Zhang, Ruotong Yin, Yuanji Li, Mingzhe Li, Ji- ashuo Gong, Mingquan He, Yisheng Chai, Xiaoyuan Zhou, Yilin Wang, Aifeng Wang, Ya-Jun Yan, and Dong-Lai Feng, “Discovery of a long-ranged charge or- der with 1/4 Ge1-dimerization in an antiferromagnetic Kagome metal,” Nature Communications15(2024), 10.1038/s4146...

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50661-x 2024
[24]

Symmetry Breaking and Ascending in the Magnetic Kagome Metal FeGe,

Shangfei Wu, Mason L. Klemm, Jay Shah, Ethan T. Ritz, Chunruo Duan, Xiaokun Teng, Bin Gao, Feng Ye, Masaaki Matsuda, Fankang Li, Xianghan Xu, Ming Yi, Turan Birol, Pengcheng Dai, and Girsh Blumberg, “Symmetry Breaking and Ascending in the Magnetic Kagome Metal FeGe,” Physical Review X14, 011043 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

Charge density wave with suppressed long- range structural modulation in canted antiferromag- netic kagome FeGe,

Chenfei Shi, Wenchang Hou, Hanbin Deng, Bikash Pa- tra, Surya Rohith Kotla, Yi Liu, Sitaram Ramakrish- nan, Claudio Eisele, Harshit Agarwal, Leila Noohinejad, Ji-Yong Liu, Tianyu Yang, Guowei Liu, Bishal Baran 7 Maity, Qi Wang, Zhaodi Lin, Baojuan Kang, Wanting Yang, Yongchang Li, Zhihua Yang, Yuxiang Chen, Xi- ang Li, Yuke Li, Yanpeng Qi, Arumugam Thamiz...

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02316-6 2025
[26]

Competing phases in kagome magnet FeGe from functional renormalization,

Pietro M. Bonetti, Yi Jiang, Haoyu Hu, Dumitru C˘ alug˘ aru, Michael M. Scherer, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Laura Classen, “Competing phases in kagome magnet FeGe from functional renormalization,” (2024)

work page 2024
[27]

Intriguing low-temperature phase in the antiferromagnetic kagome metal fege,

M. Wenzel, E. Uykur, A. A. Tsirlin, S. Pal, R. Mathew Roy, C. Yi, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, A. V. Pronin, and M. Dressel, “Intriguing low-temperature phase in the antiferromagnetic kagome metal fege,” Physical Review Letters132, 266505 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

Orbital hybridization and magnetic moment enhancement driven by charge density waves in kagome fege,

Shulun Han, Linyang Li, Chi Sin Tang, Qi Wang, Lingfeng Zhang, Caozheng Diao, Mingwen Zhao, Shuo Sun, Lijun Tian, Mark B. H. Breese, Chuanbing Cai, Milorad V. Miloˇ sevi´ c, Yanpeng Qi, Andrew T. S. Wee, and Xinmao Yin, “Orbital hybridization and magnetic moment enhancement driven by charge density waves in kagome fege,” Applied Physics Reviews12(2025), 1...

work page doi:10.1063/5.0260257 2025
[29]

Magnetic interactions and possible structural distortion in kagome FeGe from first-principles calculations and symmetry analysis,

Hanjing Zhou, Songsong Yan, Dongze Fan, Di Wang, and Xiangang Wan, “Magnetic interactions and possible structural distortion in kagome FeGe from first-principles calculations and symmetry analysis,” Physical Review B 108, 035138 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Neutron diffraction studies of the low-temperature magnetic structure of hexagonal fege,

J Bernhard, B Lebech, and O Beckman, “Neutron diffraction studies of the low-temperature magnetic structure of hexagonal fege,” Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics14, 2379–2393 (1984)

work page 1984
[31]

Localized versus itinerant electrons in hexagonal fege,

Olof Beckman, Lorna J. Sundstr¨ om, Kjell Carrander, and Leif Lundgren, “Localized versus itinerant electrons in hexagonal fege,” Solid State Communications12, 1061–1065 (1973)

work page 1973
[32]

Competing itinerant and local spin interactions in kagome metal FeGe,

Lebing Chen, Xiaokun Teng, Hengxin Tan, Barry L. Winn, Garrett E. Granroth, Feng Ye, D. H. Yu, R. A. Mole, Bin Gao, Binghai Yan, Ming Yi, and Pengcheng Dai, “Competing itinerant and local spin interactions in kagome metal FeGe,” Nature Communications15(2024), 10.1038/s41467-023-44190-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44190-2 2024
[34]

L¨ uthi, Physical Acoustics in the Solid State (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

B. L¨ uthi, Physical Acoustics in the Solid State (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

work page 2007
[35]

Spin-lattice effects in se- lected antiferromagnetic materials (review article),

S. Zherlitsyn, S. Yasin, J. Wosnitza, A. A. Zvyagin, A. V. Andreev, and V. Tsurkan, “Spin-lattice effects in se- lected antiferromagnetic materials (review article),” Low Temperature Physics40, 123–133 (2014)

work page 2014
[36]

Ultra-robust high-field magnetization plateau and supersolidity in bond-frustrated mncr 2 s 4,

Vladimir Tsurkan, Sergei Zherlitsyn, Lilian Prodan, Viorel Felea, Pham Thanh Cong, Yurii Skourski, Zhe Wang, Joachim Deisenhofer, Hans-Albrecht Krug von Nidda, Joahim Wosnitza, and Alois Loidl, “Ultra-robust high-field magnetization plateau and supersolidity in bond-frustrated mncr 2 s 4,” Science Advances3(2017), 10.1126/sciadv.1601982

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601982 2017
[37]

Magnon-phonon interactions in the spinel compound mnsc 2se4,

J. Sourd, Y. Skourski, L. Prodan, V. Tsurkan, A. Miy- ata, J. Wosnitza, and S. Zherlitsyn, “Magnon-phonon interactions in the spinel compound mnsc 2se4,” Physical Review B110, 094414 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

Supplementary material for: Magnetoelastic signatures

L. Prodan, J. Sourd, S. Zherlitsyn, and L. Chioncel, “Supplementary material for: Magnetoelastic signatures ...” (2026)

work page 2026
[39]

Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- density waves,

P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, “Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- density waves,” Phys. Rev. B26, 4883–4893 (1982)

work page 1982
[40]

Phonon self-energy corrections: To screen, or not to screen,

Jan Berges, Nina Girotto, Tim Wehling, Nicola Marzari, and Samuel Ponc´ e, “Phonon self-energy corrections: To screen, or not to screen,” Phys. Rev. X13, 041009 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

Gerald D Mahan, Many-particle physics (Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013
[42]

The relevant quantity is the real part of the phonon self- energy taken in the limitq→0 and Ω n →0. Since the order of limits may not commute, one should first take the long-wavelength limitq→0 along the acoustic branch (ω∼vq) before sending Ω n →0, corresponding to the experimental ultrasound condition

work page
[43]

Since it does not contain intrin- sic fluctuation energy scales, it does not participate in scaling behavior

In the scaling analysis we neglect the smooth background contribution modeled as a second-order polynomial inT which represents analytic, non-critical lattice effects that are field independent. Since it does not contain intrin- sic fluctuation energy scales, it does not participate in scaling behavior

work page
[44]

5 (Cambridge university press, 1996)

John Cardy, Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics, Vol. 5 (Cambridge university press, 1996). Supplemental Material: Magnetoelastic Signatures of the Conical State and Charge Density Waves in Antiferromagnetic FeGe L. Prodan, 1,∗ J. Sourd, 2 S. Zherlitsyn, 2 and L. Chioncel 3, 4,† 1Experimentalphysik V, Center for Electronic Correlations and ...

work page 1996
[45]

Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromag- net,

Xiaokun Teng, Lebing Chen, Feng Ye, Elliott Rosenberg, Zhaoyu Liu, Jia-Xin Yin, Yu-Xiao Jiang, Ji Seop Oh, M. Zahid Hasan, Kelly J. Neubauer, Bin Gao, Yaofeng Xie, Makoto Hashimoto, Donghui Lu, Chris Jozwiak, Aaron Bostwick, Eli Rotenberg, Robert J. Birgeneau, Jiun-Haw Chu, Ming Yi, and Pengcheng Dai, “Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice ...

work page 2022
[46]

Neutron diffrac- tion studies of the low-temperature magnetic structure of hexagonal fege,

J Bernhard, B Lebech, and O Beckman, “Neutron diffrac- tion studies of the low-temperature magnetic structure of hexagonal fege,” Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics14, 2379–2393 (1984)

work page 1984
[47]

Magnetic phase diagram of hexagonal fege determined by neutron diffrac- tion,

J Bernhard, B Lebech, and O Beckman, “Magnetic phase diagram of hexagonal fege determined by neutron diffrac- tion,” Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics18, 539–552 (1988)

work page 1988
[48]

Spin-lattice effects in selected antiferromagnetic materials (review article),

S. Zherlitsyn, S. Yasin, J. Wosnitza, A. A. Zvyagin, A. V. Andreev, and V. Tsurkan, “Spin-lattice effects in selected antiferromagnetic materials (review article),” Low Tem- perature Physics40, 123–133 (2014)

work page 2014
[49]

Fractional- ized excitations probed by ultrasound,

A. Hauspurg, S. Zherlitsyn, T. Helm, V. Felea, J. Wos- nitza, V. Tsurkan, K.-Y. Choi, S.-H. Do, Mengxing Ye, Wolfram Brenig, and Natalia B. Perkins, “Fractional- ized excitations probed by ultrasound,” Physical Review B109, 144415 (2024)

work page 2024