Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 71 references

First-principles identification of optically efficient erbium centers in GaAs

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-15 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Hybrid-functional calculations identify the Er–2O defect as the most efficient trap-assisted center for exciting Er³⁺ luminescence in GaAs under host excitation or minority-carrier injection.

desk verdict Solid hybrid-functional ranking that finally explains why Er-2O wins in GaAs, with the usual domain caveat that energy transfer itself is not computed. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.07925 v2 pith:QDITCPCH submitted 2026-03-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Khang Hoang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords erbium-dopedGaAsEr-2Ocenterhybridfunctionalsdefectcomplexesnonradiativecarriercapturerare-earthluminescencetrap-assistedrecombinationoxygencodoping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Erbium-doped GaAs has been studied for decades for 1.54 μm light and quantum devices, yet which atomic centers actually convert host carriers into Er³⁺ emission has remained unclear. This paper maps isolated Er defects, Er–native-defect complexes, and Er–oxygen complexes with hybrid-functional defect calculations, finding that their formation energies and levels are asymmetric with doping and generally favor electron trapping. Ranking centers by trap depth (at least ~0.81 eV), formation energy, and first-principles nonradiative capture coefficients singles out the (ErGa–2OAs)²⁺/⁺ center—the experimental Er-2O—as the most efficient recombination trap. The same results explain why n-type doping suppresses the center, why the Er:2O ratio is optimal, and why other centers can be bright only under direct 4f excitation. The work supplies a concrete screening recipe for rare-earth luminescence centers in semiconductors.

What carries the argument

Hybrid (HSE) formation energies, thermodynamic charge-transition levels, and nonradiative multiphonon capture coefficients (Alkauskas–Van de Walle method via nonrad). Together they screen which Er-related configurations can act as efficient electron traps whose recombination energy can feed the Er 4f core.

What would settle it

A DLTS or deep-level optical measurement that places the Er-2O (2+/+) level outside the ~0.82–1.22 eV window above the valence band, or a capture-rate experiment showing that (ErGa–2OAs)²⁺ is not among the fastest electron traps of the Er–O family under p-type conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Among Er-related defects in GaAs, the (ErGa–2OAs)²⁺/⁺ center is the most efficient trap-assisted nonradiative recombination center for Er³⁺ excitation under host photoexcitation or minority-carrier injection. It combines a suitable trap depth (~0.93 eV above the valence-band maximum), near-zero electron-capture barrier, large Sommerfeld factor from its double-positive charge, sizable electron–phonon coupling, and low formation energy under p-type conditions.

Load-bearing premise

Optical efficiency is inferred from trap depth and capture rate alone; the paper never calculates the actual Auger-type energy transfer into the Er 4f shell or the subsequent radiative rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Er-2O forms most readily under p-type (and Ga-rich) conditions and is strongly suppressed by n-type doping, matching experimental luminescence trends.
  • Excess oxygen that drives centers toward ErGa–3OAs lowers the recombination energy below the 0.81 eV threshold and quenches host-excited emission.
  • Isolated interstitial Er can capture efficiently but is metastable; oxygen both stabilizes near-substitutional Er and lowers the formation energy of active complexes.
  • The same four criteria—trap depth, non-repulsive charged configuration, low capture barrier, and low formation energy—can rank rare-earth luminescence centers in other hosts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because energy transfer itself is not computed, measured host-excited quantum efficiency will track the calculated capture coefficients only if transfer is not rate-limiting; experiments that separately measure capture and transfer would test that premise.
  • Cavity or nanocavity coupling of Er-2O centers should be most effective when growth is deliberately p-type and oxygen is held near the 1:2 ratio.
  • The same hybrid-functional capture screening can be applied to other rare-earth ions (e.g., Eu, Tm) in GaAs, GaN, or related III–V hosts to pre-select candidate centers before growth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a systematic hybrid-functional (HSE) first-principles study of isolated Er defects and Er complexes with native defects or oxygen in GaAs. Formation energies, thermodynamic transition levels, binding energies, and nonradiative multiphonon capture coefficients (via nonrad) are computed for a large set of centers. The central claim is that (ErGa-2OAs)2+/+ is the most efficient trap-assisted recombination center for Er3+ excitation under host photoexcitation or minority-carrier injection, because it combines a suitable trap depth (~0.93 eV above the VBM), near-zero electron-capture barrier, large Sommerfeld factor, sizable electron-phonon coupling, and low formation energy under p-type conditions. The results also rationalize the experimental suppression of Er-2O under n-type doping and the degradation of luminescence when the Er:O ratio deviates from 1:2.

Significance. If the ranking holds, the work supplies a coherent microscopic explanation for decades of experimental observations on (Er,O)-doped GaAs, including why Er-2O dominates host-excited luminescence, why n-type doping suppresses it, and why excess oxygen is detrimental. The combination of HSE formation-energy diagrams, finite-size corrections, binding energies, and first-principles multiphonon capture coefficients is a clear methodological advance over earlier LDA studies and yields falsifiable predictions (trap depths, capture coefficients, doping asymmetry) that can be tested by DLTS and luminescence experiments. The computational protocol is transferable to other rare-earth-doped semiconductors of interest for optoelectronics and quantum information.

minor comments (5)
  1. The manuscript is explicit that energy transfer into the Er 4f core and the intra-4f radiative rates are not computed (Introduction criteria and Methodology). A short clarifying sentence in the abstract or conclusions would help readers who might otherwise over-read the claim of 'optical efficiency'.
  2. Supercell size (216 atoms) and Gamma-only sampling are standard for this class of calculation but should be noted as a residual uncertainty for the more delocalized charge states; a brief remark in Sec. II would suffice.
  3. Chemical-potential bounds for O (limited by beta-Ga2O3) and Er (limited by ErAs) are reasonable; stating the sensitivity of the absolute formation energies (but not the relative ranking) to these bounds would strengthen Sec. III C.
  4. Figure 6 and Table S3 would benefit from a short note on the temperature range over which the capture coefficients remain ordered as shown, so that room-temperature device relevance is transparent.
  5. A few typographical issues remain (e.g., 'identiβcation', 'eβcient' in the title block of the arXiv PDF; occasional OCR-like character substitutions in the body). These should be cleaned before final production.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: defect levels, formation energies and capture coefficients are computed from HSE total energies and configuration-coordinate diagrams, not fitted to or defined by the experimental luminescence they later rationalize.

full rationale

The derivation chain is standard first-principles defect physics. Formation energies (Eq. 1) and thermodynamic transition levels (Eq. 2) are obtained from HSE total-energy differences of supercells; nonradiative capture coefficients are obtained from the Alkauskas multiphonon formalism implemented in nonrad, using only the computed geometries, ionization energies and electron-phonon matrix elements (Table S3, Figs. 5-6). These quantities are then ranked against four a-priori physical criteria (suitable trap depth ≥ 0.81 eV, non-repulsive carrier-capturing charge state, low formation energy, high Cn) that follow from the known Er3+ 4I15/2 o4I13/2 energy and basic recombination kinetics. Experimental numbers (Hogg 0.82-1.22 eV window, Takahei Ec-0.42 eV estimate, EXAFS bond lengths, doping trends) appear only as external benchmarks after the calculations are finished; they are never used as fit parameters or definitional inputs. Self-citations (Refs. 47-51, 59) supply methodological continuity and native-defect reference data, but the Er-complex energetics, levels and capture coefficients that underwrite the central claim are newly computed here and do not reduce to those citations by construction. The explicit omission of the Auger energy-transfer step is acknowledged in the text and does not create a circular loop. Hence the score is 1 (minor self-citation present but non-load-bearing).

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central ranking rests on standard hybrid-DFT defect methodology, the multiphonon nonradiative-capture formalism of Alkauskas et al., and the physical premise that a suitable trap depth plus large capture coefficient implies efficient Auger energy transfer to Er3+. No free parameters are fitted to the luminescence data; chemical-potential bounds and HSE mixing are conventional choices. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • HSE Hartree-Fock mixing parameter = 0.28
    Set to 0.28 (rather than the default 0.25) to improve the GaAs band gap; conventional but still a chosen value that affects absolute level positions.
  • Oxygen chemical potential upper bound = Delta H(beta-Ga2O3) = -10.15 eV
    Limited by formation of beta-Ga2O3; standard but affects absolute formation energies of all O-containing complexes.
  • Erbium chemical potential upper bound = Delta H(ErAs) = -3.58 eV
    Limited by formation of ErAs; sets the absolute scale of Er-related formation energies.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hybrid DFT (HSE) total energies with Freysoldt finite-size corrections yield reliable defect formation energies and thermodynamic transition levels in GaAs.
    Standard in modern defect physics; invoked throughout Sec. II and used for all formation-energy diagrams.
  • domain assumption Nonradiative multiphonon capture coefficients computed via the Alkauskas one-dimensional configuration-coordinate model (nonrad code) correctly rank relative capture efficiencies.
    Methodology section; parameters extracted in Table S3 and plotted in Fig. 6.
  • domain assumption A defect whose transition level lies above ~0.81 eV and that captures minority carriers efficiently will transfer recombination energy into the Er 4f shell via an Auger-type process, thereby exciting luminescence.
    Stated as criteria (i)-(iv) in Sec. I; the paper does not compute the transfer step itself.
  • domain assumption Chemical potentials of Ga, As, O, and Er are bounded by bulk Ga, As, beta-Ga2O3, and ErAs under equilibrium conditions.
    Sec. II; used to generate the Ga-rich and As-rich formation-energy plots.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-principles identification of optically efficient erbium centers in GaAs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDITCPCH

@misc{pith2026260307925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-principles identification of optically efficient erbium centers in GaAs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDITCPCH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.07925}
}
abstract

Gallium arsenide (GaAs) doped with erbium (Er), a material of interest for optoelectronics and quantum information, has been studied for decades. Yet the formation of Er luminescence centers in the semiconductor host and their properties are still not well understood. Here we present a systematic investigation of Er-related defects in GaAs, including defect complexes consisting of Er and native point defects or oxygen impurities, using first-principles hybrid-functional defect calculations. We find that these defects have electronic structure and energetics that are generally asymmetric with respect to n- and p-type doping and tend to favor electron trapping. On the basis of the calculated defect levels, formation energies, and nonradiative carrier capture coefficients, we identify Er-related defects that are efficient as trap-assisted nonradiative recombination centers for Er$^{3+}$ excitation under host photoexcitation or via minority carrier injection. Our results provide an understanding for why a particular defect center with Er coupled to two oxygen atoms is most efficient, and for the effects of n- and p-type doping and of the Er/O ratio on the formation of optically active Er centers and on the Er luminescence observed in experiments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    O’Donnell and V

    K. O’Donnell and V. Dierolf, eds., Rare Earth Doped III- Nitrides for Optoelectronic and Spintronic Applications , Topics in Applied Physics, Vol. 124 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    C. Yin, M. Rancic, G. G. de Boo, N. Stavrias, J. C. Mc- Callum, M. J. Sellars, and S. Rogge, Optical addressing of an individual erbium ion in silicon, Nature 497, 91 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Ogawa, J

    M. Ogawa, J. Tatebayashi, N. Fujioka, R. Higashi, M. Fu- jita, S. Noda, D. Timmerman, S. Ichikawa, and Y. Fu- jiwara, Quantitative evaluation of enhanced Er lumines- cence in GaAs-based two-dimensional photonic crystal nanocavities, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 181102 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Higashi, M

    R. Higashi, M. Ogawa, J. Tatebayashi, N. Fujioka, D. Timmerman, S. Ichikawa, and Y. Fujiwara, Enhance- ment of Er luminescence in microdisk resonators made of Er,O-codoped GaAs, J. Appl. Phys. 127, 233101 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Z. Fang, J. Tatebayashi, R. Homi, M. Ogawa, H. Ka- jii, M. Kondow, K. Kitamura, B. Mitchell, S. Ichikawa, and Y. Fujiwara, Enhancement of Er luminescence from bridge-type photonic crystal nanocavities with Er, O-co- doped GaAs, Opt. Continuum 2, 2178 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Z. Fang, H. Kajii, M. Kondow, Y. Fujiwara, and J. Tate- bayashi, Demonstration of enhanced Er luminescence in nanobeam photonic crystal nanocavities based on Er,O- codoped GaAs, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 025001 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Thiel, T

    C. Thiel, T. B ottger, and R. Cone, Rare-earth-doped ma- terials for applications in quantum information storage and signal processing, J. Lumin. 131, 353 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Kunkel and P

    N. Kunkel and P. Goldner, Recent Advances in Rare Earth Doped Inorganic Crystalline Materials for Quan- tum Information Processing, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 644, 66 (2018)

    2018

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Ennen, J

    H. Ennen, J. Schneider, G. Pomrenke, and A. Axmann, 1.54- m luminescence of erbium-implanted III-V semi- conductors and silicon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 943 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    G. S. Pomrenke, H. Ennen, and W. Haydl, Photolumines- cence optimization and characteristics of the rare-earth element erbium implanted in GaAs, InP, and GaP, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 601 (1986)

    1986

  3. [11]

    R. S. Smith, H. D. M uller, H. Ennen, P. Wennekers, and M. Maier, Erbium doping of molecular beam epitaxial GaAs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 49 (1987)

    1987

  4. [12]

    Ennen, J

    H. Ennen, J. Wagner, H. D. M uller, and R. S. Smith, Photoluminescence excitation measurements on GaAs:Er grown by molecular-beam epitaxy, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 4877 (1987)

    1987

  5. [13]

    Thonke, H

    K. Thonke, H. U. Hermann, and J. Schneider, A Zeeman study of the 1.54 m transition in molecular beam epi- taxial GaAs:Er, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21, 5881 (1988)

    1988

  6. [14]

    Takahei, P

    K. Takahei, P. S. Whitney, H. Nakagome, and K. Uwai, Temperature dependence of intra-4 f -shell photo- and electroluminescence spectra for erbium-doped GaAs, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1257 (1989)

    1989

  7. [15]

    Kozanecki, M

    A. Kozanecki, M. Chan, C. Jeynes, B. Sealy, and K. Homewood, Lattice location of erbium implanted into GaAs, Solid State Commun. 78, 763 (1991)

    1991

  8. [16]

    Nakata, M

    J. Nakata, M. Taniguchi, and K. Takahei, Direct evidenc e of Er atoms occupying an interstitial site in metalorganic chemical vapor deposition-grown GaAs:Er, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 2665 (1992)

    1992

  9. [17]

    Nakata, N

    J. Nakata, N. Jourdan, H. Yamaguchi, K. Takahei, Y. Ya- mamoto, and Y. Kido, Structural analysis of erbium sheet-doped GaAs grown by molecular-beam epitaxy, with ion channeling followed by Monte Carlo simulation, 9 FIG. S1. Local structures of select Er-related defect con g ur...

    1995

  10. [18]

    Alves, M

    E. Alves, M. F. da Silva, J. C. Soares, M. O. Henry, R. Gwilliam, B. J. Sealy, K. Freitag, R. Vianden, and D. Stievenard, Lattice site location of thulium and er- bium implanted GaAs, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 136{138, 421 (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    U. Wahl, A. Vantomme, G. Langouche, and T. ISOLDE collaboration, Lattice sites and damage annealing of Er in low-dose implanted GaAs, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 148, 492 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Nakagome, K

    H. Nakagome, K. Uwai, and K. Takahei, Extremely sharp erbium-related intra-4 f -shell photoluminescence of erbium-doped GaAs grown by metalorganic chemical va- por deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1726 (1988)

    1988

  13. [21]

    Taguchi, K

    A. Taguchi, K. Takahei, and J. Nakata, Electronic prop- erties and their relations to optical properties in rare earth doped III-V semiconductors, in Rare Earth Doped Semiconductors, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 301 ∞0 TABLE S1. Defect energy levels [ (q=q 0), in eV, with ...

    1993

  14. [22]

    Takahei and A

    K. Takahei and A. Taguchi, Selective formation of an ef- cient Er-O luminescence center in gaas by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition under an atmosphere contain- ing oxygen, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1979 (1993)

    1979

  15. [23]

    Takahei and A

    K. Takahei and A. Taguchi, E cient Er Luminescence Centers Formed in GaAs by Metalorganic Chemical Va- FIG. S3. Nonradiative hole capture coe cient ( Cp) at select Er-related defect centers in GaAs; see text. por Deposition with Oxygen Codoping, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 709 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    Takahei, A

    K. Takahei, A. Taguchi, Y. Horikoshi, and J. Nakata, Atomic con guration of the Er-O luminescence center in Er-doped GaAs with oxygen codoping, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4332 (1994)

    1994

  17. [25]

    Kaczanowski, Y

    J. Kaczanowski, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Kido, J. Nakata, and K. Takahei, Monte Carlo simulation of channeling spectra for compound crystals with point defects and crystalline precipitates, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 117, 275 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    Ofuchi, T

    H. Ofuchi, T. Kubo, M. Tabuchi, K. Takahei, and Y. Takeda, Local structures around Er atoms in GaAs:Er,O studied by uorescence EXAFS and photo- luminescence, Microelectron. Eng. 51{52, 715 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Takahei, A

    K. Takahei, A. Taguchi, and R. A. Hogg, Atomic con g- urations of er centers in GaAs:Er,O and AlGaAs:Er,O studied by site-selective luminescence spectroscopy, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 3997 (1997)

    1997

  20. [28]

    Takahei and A

    K. Takahei and A. Taguchi, Photoluminescence analysis of Er-doped GaAs under host photoexcitation and direct intra-4f -shell photoexcitation, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 5614 (1995)

    1995

  21. [29]

    Takahei and A

    K. Takahei and A. Taguchi, Photoluminescence- excitation analysis of Er-doped GaAs grown by metalor- ganic vapor phase deposition, J. Appl. Phys. 77, 1735 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    Ishiyama, E

    T. Ishiyama, E. Katayama, K. Murakami, K. Takahei, and A. Taguchi, Electron spin resonance of Er{oxygen complexes in GaAs grown by metal organic chemical va- por deposition, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 6782 (1998)

    1998

  23. [31]

    Haase, A

    D. Haase, A. Dornen, K. Takahei, and A. Taguchi, Study of the Zeeman e ect of Er 3+ in GaAs:Er,O, in Rare Earth Doped Semiconductors II , Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 442 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA,

  24. [32]

    R. A. Hogg, K. Takahei, and A. Taguchi, Photolumines- cence excitation spectroscopy of GaAs:Er,O in the near- band-edge region, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 8682 (1996). ∞∞ TABLE S2. Stable charge states of defect complexes, their co nstituent defects, and binding energies ( Eb). Comple...

    1996

  25. [33]

    R. A. Hogg, K. Takahei, A. Taguchi, and Y. Horikoshi, Preferential alignment of Er{2O centers in GaAs:Er,O revealed by anisotropic host-excited photoluminescence, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3317 (1996)

    1996

  26. [34]

    T. D. Culp, J. G. Cederberg, B. Bieg, T. F. Kuech, K. L. Bray, D. Pfei er, and C. H. Winter, Photoluminescence and free carrier interactions in erbium-doped GaAs, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 4918 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    J. G. Cederberg, T. D. Culp, B. Bieg, D. Pfei er, C. H. Winter, K. L. Bray, and T. F. Kuech, Incorpo- ration of optically active erbium into GaAs using the novel precursor tris(3,5-di-tert-butylpyrazolato)bis( 4- tert-butylpyridine)erbium, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 1825 (1999)

    1999

  28. [36]

    Fujiwara, T

    Y. Fujiwara, T. Kawamoto, T. Koide, and Y. Takeda, Luminescence properties of Er,O-codoped III{V semicon- ductors grown by organometallic vapor phase epitaxy, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 273{274, 770 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    Koizumi, Y

    A. Koizumi, Y. Fujiwara, A. Urakami, K. In- oue, T. Yoshikane, and Y. Takeda, E ects of ac- tive layer thickness on Er excitation cross section in GaInP/GaAs:Er,O/GaInP double heterostructure light- emitting diodes, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 340-342, 309 (2003). ∞2

    2003

  30. [38]

    Koizumi, Y

    A. Koizumi, Y. Fujiwara, A. Urakami, K. Inoue, T. Yoshikane, and Y. Takeda, Room-temperature electro- luminescence properties of Er,O-codoped GaAs injection- type light-emitting diodes grown by organometallic vapor phase epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4521 (2003)

    2003

  31. [39]

    Fujiwara, Room-Temperature Operation of Injection - Type 1.5 m Light-Emitting Diodes with Er,O-Codoped GaAs, Mater

    Y. Fujiwara, Room-Temperature Operation of Injection - Type 1.5 m Light-Emitting Diodes with Er,O-Codoped GaAs, Mater. Trans. 46, 1969 (2005)

    1969

  32. [40]

    Takahei, R

    K. Takahei, R. Hogg, and A. Taguchi, Energy-transfer processes in oxygen-coped GaAs:Er, in Rare Earth Doped Semiconductors II, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol. 442 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996) pp. 267{278

    1996

  33. [41]

    Nakamura, S

    K. Nakamura, S. Takemoto, Y. Terai, M. Suzuki, A. Koizumi, Y. Takeda, M. Tonouchi, and Y. Fujiwara, Direct observation of trapping of photo-excited carriers in Er,O-codoped GaAs, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 376{ 377, 556 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    Ishii, A

    M. Ishii, A. Koizumi, Y. Takeda, and Y. Fujiwara, Dis- crimination between energy transfer and back transfer processes for GaAs host and Er luminescent dopants us- ing electric response analysis, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 133510 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Katsuno, H

    H. Katsuno, H. Ohta, O. Portugall, N. Ubrig, M. Fuji- sawa, F. Elmasry, S. Okubo, and Y. Fujiwara, Energy structure of Er-2O center in GaAs:Er,O studied by high magnetic eld photoluminescence measurement, J. Lu- min. 131, 2294 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Elmasry, S

    F. Elmasry, S. Okubo, H. Ohta, and Y. Fujiwara, Elec- tron spin resonance study of Er-concentration e ect in GaAs:Er,O containing charge carriers, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 193904 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    R. L. Maltez, E. Ribeiro, A. A. Bernussi, L. Amaral, M. Behar, P. Specht, and Z. Liliental-Weber, TEM and PL characterization of erbium and oxygen co-implanted LT-GaAs:Be, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 218, 444 (2004)

    2004

  38. [46]

    Gregorkiewicz and J

    T. Gregorkiewicz and J. Langer, Lasing in Rare-Earth- Doped Semiconductors: Hopes and Facts, MRS Bulletin 24, 27{32 (1999)

    1999

  39. [47]

    Hoang, Hybrid density functional study of optically active Er 3+ centers in GaN, Phys

    K. Hoang, Hybrid density functional study of optically active Er 3+ centers in GaN, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 9, 722 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Hoang, First-principles identi cation of defect le vels in Er-doped GaN, Phys

    K. Hoang, First-principles identi cation of defect le vels in Er-doped GaN, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 10, 915 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Hoang, Rare-earth defects and defect-related lumin es- cence in ZnS, J

    K. Hoang, Rare-earth defects and defect-related lumin es- cence in ZnS, J. Appl. Phys. 131, 015705 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Hoang, Tuning the valence and concentration of eu- ropium and luminescence centers in GaN through co- doping and defect association, Phys

    K. Hoang, Tuning the valence and concentration of eu- ropium and luminescence centers in GaN through co- doping and defect association, Phys. Rev. Materials 5, 034601 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Hoang, Rare-earth defects in GaN: A systematic in- vestigation of the lanthanide series, Phys

    K. Hoang, Rare-earth defects in GaN: A systematic in- vestigation of the lanthanide series, Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 044601 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Taguchi and T

    A. Taguchi and T. Ohno, Erbium in GaAs: Coupling with native defects, Phys. Rev. B 56, 9477 (1997)

    1997

  45. [53]

    Svane, N

    A. Svane, N. E. Christensen, L. Petit, Z. Szotek, and W. M. Temmerman, Electronic structure of rare-earth impurities in GaAs and GaN, Phys. Rev. B 74, 165204 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Coutinho, R

    J. Coutinho, R. Jones, M. J. Shaw, P. R. Briddon, and S. Oberg, Optically active erbium{oxygen complexes in GaAs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1683 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  48. [56]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations In- cluding Exchange and Correlation E ects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  49. [57]

    D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Ground State of the Electron Gas by a Stochastic Method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)

    1980

  50. [58]

    Freysoldt, B

    C. Freysoldt, B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, G. Kresse, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, First- principles calculations for point defects in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 253 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    Hoang, First-principles characterization of na- tive defects and oxygen impurities in GaAs (2025), arXiv:2506.07954 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    K. Hoang, First-principles characterization of na- tive defects and oxygen impurities in GaAs (2025), arXiv:2506.07954 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Alkauskas, Q

    A. Alkauskas, Q. Yan, and C. G. Van de Walle, First- principles theory of nonradiative carrier capture via mul- tiphonon emission, Phys. Rev. B 90, 075202 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid func- tionals based on a screened Coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  54. [62]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  55. [63]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm uller, E cient iterative schem es for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  56. [64]

    C. G. Van de Walle and J. Neugebauer, First-principles calculations for defects and impurities: Applications to III-nitrides, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 3851 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Freysoldt, J

    C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. Van de Walle, Fully Ab Initio Finite-Size Corrections for Charged- Defect Supercell Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016402 (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Freysoldt, J

    C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. Van de Walle, Electrostatic interactions between charged defects in su- percells, phys. status solidi (b) 248, 1067 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    Hanks and M

    R. Hanks and M. M. Faktor, Quantitative application of dynamic di erential calorimetry. Part 2.{Heats of forma- tion of the group 3A arsenides, Trans. Faraday Soc. 63, 1130 (1967)

    1967

  60. [68]

    M. E. Turiansky, A. Alkauskas, M. Engel, G. Kresse, D. Wickramaratne, J.-X. Shen, C. E. Dreyer, and C. G. Van de Walle, Nonrad: Computing nonradiative capture coe cients from rst principles, Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 267, 108056 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    V. Wang, N. Xu, J.-C. Liu, G. Tang, and W.-T. Geng, V ASPKIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high- throughput computing and analysis using V ASP code, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108033 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    R. D. Shannon, Revised e ective ionic radii and sys- tematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crys- tallogr. 32, 751 (1976)

    1976

  63. [71]

    Fiorentini, E ective-mass single and double accept or spectra in GaAs, Phys

    V. Fiorentini, E ective-mass single and double accept or spectra in GaAs, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10161 (1995)

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed July 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.