pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.08081 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Simulating non-Markovian open quantum dynamics by exploiting physics-informed neural network

Long Cao , Liwei Ge , Daochi Zhang , Yao Wang , Rui-Xue Xu , YiJing Yan , Xiao Zheng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords physics-informed neural networkopen quantum systemsnon-Markovian dynamicsdissipaton-embedded quantum master equationsingle-impurity Anderson modelquantum dissipation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Physics-informed neural networks solve the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation for open quantum dynamics without variational optimization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces the PINN-DQME method, which embeds physics-informed neural networks into the neural quantum state framework to simulate non-Markovian open quantum system dynamics. It replaces the time-dependent variational principle with time-encoded networks and a time-domain decomposition strategy that directly represents evolution under the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation. Validation on the single-impurity Anderson model shows that the approach reproduces numerically exact hierarchical equations of motion results with high accuracy when temperatures are high and non-Markovian memory effects remain weak. The work highlights that error accumulation during propagation becomes problematic once strong memory effects appear at low temperatures.

Core claim

The PINN-DQME method employs time-encoded neural networks within a time-domain decomposition strategy to represent the evolution governed by the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation, achieving high accuracy in simulating quantum dissipative dynamics at high temperatures where non-Markovian effects are weak, as demonstrated by direct comparison to the hierarchical equations of motion in the single-impurity Anderson model.

What carries the argument

Time-encoded neural networks combined with time-domain decomposition that directly represent the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation (DQME) evolution in a physics-informed manner.

If this is right

  • The method avoids the computational cost of the time-dependent variational principle for open quantum dynamics.
  • It delivers accurate results specifically for high-temperature dissipative processes with weak non-Markovian memory.
  • Error accumulation limits reliability for strongly non-Markovian dynamics at low temperatures.
  • The framework can be applied to other open quantum models once the propagation stability is improved.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same decomposition strategy could extend to larger system-bath models where exact methods become intractable.
  • Adaptive network retraining at selected time windows might reduce accumulation errors without changing the core architecture.
  • The approach offers a route to hybrid classical simulation of quantum devices in the high-temperature regime.

Load-bearing premise

That time-encoded neural networks combined with time-domain decomposition can represent the DQME evolution without significant error accumulation during propagation in regimes with strong non-Markovian memory effects.

What would settle it

Compare PINN-DQME time-dependent populations and coherences against hierarchical equations of motion results for the single-impurity Anderson model at low temperatures over long propagation times to measure whether deviation grows systematically.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08081 by Daochi Zhang, Liwei Ge, Long Cao, Rui-Xue Xu, Xiao Zheng, Yao Wang, YiJing Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the fermionic DQME theory, map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic of the neural network representing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The evolution of the electric current flowing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Comparison of electric current for two loss func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Staged training process with adaptive residual-point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of PINN-DQME performance using dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the electric current at different tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison of different optimizers at the temper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work integrates the physics-informed neural network (PINN) approach into the neural quantum state framework to simulate open quantum system dynamics, to circumvent the computationally expensive time-dependent variational principle required in conventional variational methods. The proposed PINN-DQME method employs time-encoded neural networks within a time-domain decomposition strategy to represent the evolution governed by the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation (DQME). We implement and validate this approach in the single-impurity Anderson model, benchmarking the PINN-DQME results against the numerically exact hierarchical equations of motion. The PINN-DQME method demonstrates high accuracy in simulating quantum dissipative dynamics at high temperatures, where non-Markovian effects are weak. However, for strongly non-Markovian dynamics at low temperatures, it encounters challenges with error accumulation during time propagation, highlighting an area for future refinement in applying PINNs to complex quantum dynamical settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the PINN-DQME method, which integrates physics-informed neural networks with time-encoded representations and a time-domain decomposition strategy to solve the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation (DQME) for non-Markovian open quantum dynamics. The approach is implemented and validated on the single-impurity Anderson model, with direct numerical benchmarks against the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) showing high accuracy in the high-temperature regime where non-Markovian memory effects are weak, while explicitly noting error accumulation during propagation at low temperatures.

Significance. If the high-temperature performance holds under further scrutiny, the method offers a computationally lighter alternative to variational approaches that rely on the time-dependent variational principle, potentially enabling simulations of dissipative quantum systems in regimes with limited memory effects. The explicit HEOM benchmarking and scoped claims (high-T accuracy with acknowledged low-T limitations) provide a solid foundation for assessing the technique's practical utility.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (low-temperature results): the reported error accumulation during time propagation for strongly non-Markovian cases is acknowledged but lacks a quantitative scaling analysis with respect to the number of time-domain segments or network depth; this directly affects the central claim that the time-encoded PINN representation can reliably extend beyond weak-memory regimes without additional stabilization techniques.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3.1] Notation for the time-encoded neural network input (e.g., the explicit form of the time coordinate embedding) is introduced in §3.1 but not consistently referenced in the figure captions of §4, which reduces clarity when comparing different temperature regimes.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'high accuracy' at high T without specifying quantitative thresholds (e.g., maximum relative error in population dynamics); adding these values would strengthen the summary of the HEOM comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. The manuscript explicitly scopes its claims to high-temperature performance with acknowledged limitations at low temperatures. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested analysis in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (low-temperature results): the reported error accumulation during time propagation for strongly non-Markovian cases is acknowledged but lacks a quantitative scaling analysis with respect to the number of time-domain segments or network depth; this directly affects the central claim that the time-encoded PINN representation can reliably extend beyond weak-memory regimes without additional stabilization techniques.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The central claim of the work, as stated in the abstract, is that PINN-DQME achieves high accuracy for dissipative dynamics at high temperatures where non-Markovian effects are weak; the low-temperature error accumulation is explicitly noted as a limitation requiring future refinement rather than a claim of reliable extension beyond weak-memory regimes. To directly address the concern, the revised manuscript will include a new quantitative scaling analysis in §4.2. This will report the dependence of the accumulated error on the number of time-domain segments and on network depth (number of layers and neurons), supported by additional numerical benchmarks on the Anderson model. These results will clarify the practical range of the current implementation and the need for stabilization techniques in strongly non-Markovian regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents PINN-DQME as a numerical approximation technique that integrates physics-informed neural networks with time-encoded representations and domain decomposition to solve the dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation. All performance claims are directly benchmarked against the independent, numerically exact hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) on the Anderson impurity model, with explicit reporting of error accumulation at low temperatures. No derivation step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation; the method is self-contained as a standard variational solver whose accuracy is externally falsifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that neural networks can approximate solutions to differential equations when the governing physics is encoded in the loss function, plus the validity of the DQME as a model for the chosen system.

free parameters (1)
  • Neural network weights and biases
    Fitted during training to minimize the physics-informed loss; architecture hyperparameters also chosen by hand.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Neural networks with appropriate architecture can represent solutions to the time-dependent DQME when the residual of the equation is minimized in the loss.
    Core premise of the PINN approach invoked throughout the method description.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1210 out tokens · 61938 ms · 2026-05-15T15:05:20.081002+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems,

    G. S. Engel, T. R. Calhoun, E. L. Read, T. Ahn, T. Manˇ cal, Y. Cheng, R. E. Blankenship, and G. R. Fleming, “Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems,” Nature 446, 782 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Quantum-Coherent Electronic Energy Transfer: Did Nature Think of It First?,

    G. D. Scholes, “Quantum-Coherent Electronic Energy Transfer: Did Nature Think of It First?,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett.1, 2 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Quantum Coherent Energy Transfer over Varying Pathways in Single Light-Harvesting Com- plexes,

    R. Hildner, D. Brinks, J. B. Nieder, R. J. Cogdell, and N. F. van Hulst, “Quantum Coherent Energy Transfer over Varying Pathways in Single Light-Harvesting Com- plexes,” Science340, 1448 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Energy Transfer Mechanisms and the Molec- ular Exciton Model for Molecular Aggregates,

    M. Kasha, “Energy Transfer Mechanisms and the Molec- ular Exciton Model for Molecular Aggregates,” Radiat. Res.20, 55 (1963)

    work page 1963

  5. [5]

    Expanded Theory of H- and J-Molecular Aggregates: The Effects of Vibronic Coupling and Intermolecular Charge Transfer,

    N. J. Hestand and F. C. Spano, “Expanded Theory of H- and J-Molecular Aggregates: The Effects of Vibronic Coupling and Intermolecular Charge Transfer,” Chem. Rev.118, 7069 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Perspective: Theory of quantum transport in molecular junctions,

    M. Thoss and F. Evers, “Perspective: Theory of quantum transport in molecular junctions,” J. Chem. Phys.148, 030901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Understanding the Sub- meV Precision-Tuning of Magnetic Anisotropy of Single- Molecule Junction,

    F. Uzma, L. Yang, D. He, X. Wang, S. Hu, L. Ye, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, “Understanding the Sub- meV Precision-Tuning of Magnetic Anisotropy of Single- Molecule Junction,” J. Phys. Chem. C125, 6990 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Incoherent population mixing contributions to phase-modulation two-dimensional co- herent excitation spectra,

    P. Gr´ egoire, A. R. Srimath Kandada, E. Vella, C. Tao, R. Leonelli, and C. Silva, “Incoherent population mixing contributions to phase-modulation two-dimensional co- herent excitation spectra,” J. Chem. Phys.147, 114201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Co- herent multidimensional spectroscopy of dilute gas-phase nanosystems,

    L. Bruder, U. Bangert, M. Binz, D. Uhl, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, and F. Stienkemeier, “Co- herent multidimensional spectroscopy of dilute gas-phase nanosystems,” Nat. Commun.9, 4823 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Quantum information processing with atoms and photons,

    C. Monroe, “Quantum information processing with atoms and photons,” Nature416, 238 (2002)

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    Quantum information and algorithms for correlated quantum matter,

    K. Head-Marsden, J. Flick, C. J. Ciccarino, and P. Narang, “Quantum information and algorithms for correlated quantum matter,” Chem. Rev.121, 3061 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Engineering quantum states and elec- tronic landscapes through surface molecular nanoarchi- tectures,

    I. Piquero-Zulaica, J. Lobo-Checa, Z. M. A. El-Fattah, J. E. Ortega, F. Klappenberger, W. Auw¨ arter, and J. V. Barth, “Engineering quantum states and elec- tronic landscapes through surface molecular nanoarchi- tectures,” Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045008 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    The renormalization group: Critical phe- nomena and the Kondo problem,

    K. G. Wilson, “The renormalization group: Critical phe- nomena and the Kondo problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys.47, 773 (1975)

    work page 1975

  14. [14]

    Tunneling into a Single Magnetic Atom: Spectroscopic Evidence of the Kondo Resonance,

    V. Madhavan, W. Chen, T. Jamneala, M. F. Crommie, and N. S. Wingreen, “Tunneling into a Single Magnetic Atom: Spectroscopic Evidence of the Kondo Resonance,” Science280, 567 (1998)

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    Controlling the Kondo Effect of an Adsorbed Magnetic Ion Through Its Chemical Bonding,

    A. Zhao, Q. Li, L. Chen, H. Xiang, W. Wang, S. Pan, B. Wang, X. Xiao, J. Yang, J. G. Hou, and Q. Zhu, “Controlling the Kondo Effect of an Adsorbed Magnetic Ion Through Its Chemical Bonding,” Science309, 1542 (2005)

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Molecular molds for regularizing Kondo states at atom/metal interfaces,

    X. Li et al., “Molecular molds for regularizing Kondo states at atom/metal interfaces,” Nat. Commun.11, 2566 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Kondo Memory in Driven Strongly Correlated Quantum Dots,

    X. Zheng, Y. Yan, and M. Di Ventra, “Kondo Memory in Driven Strongly Correlated Quantum Dots,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 086601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Coherent spin manipulation of individual atoms on a surface,

    K. Yang, W. Paul, S. H. Phark, P. Willke, Y. Bae, T. Choi, T. Esat, A. Ardavan, A. J. Heinrich, and C. P. Lutz, “Coherent spin manipulation of individual atoms on a surface,” Science366, 509 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Free coherent evolution of a coupled atomic spin system ini- tialized by electron scattering,

    L. M. Veldman, L. Farinacci, R. Rejali, R. Broekhoven, J. Gobeil, D. Coffey, M. Ternes, and A. F. Otte, “Free coherent evolution of a coupled atomic spin system ini- tialized by electron scattering,” Science372, 964 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Tracking spin flip-flop dynamics of surface molecules with quantum dis- sipation theory,

    X. Ding, J. Cao, X. Zheng, and L. Ye, “Tracking spin flip-flop dynamics of surface molecules with quantum dis- sipation theory,” J. Chem. Phys.162, 084114 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Nonperturbative treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems,

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, “Nonperturbative treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 030402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Mod- elling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes,

    N. Lambert, S. Ahmed, M. Cirio, and F. Nori, “Mod- elling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes,” Nat. Commun.10, 3721 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Open System Dynamics with Non-Markovian Quantum Trajectories,

    W. T. Strunz, L. Di´ osi, and N. Gisin, “Open System Dynamics with Non-Markovian Quantum Trajectories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1801 (1999)

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    Decoupling quantum dissipation interaction via stochastic fields,

    J. Shao, “Decoupling quantum dissipation interaction via stochastic fields,” J. Chem. Phys.120, 5053 (2004)

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Stochastic Representation of Non-Markovian Fermionic Quantum Dissipation,

    L. Han, V. Chernyak, Y. Yan, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, “Stochastic Representation of Non-Markovian Fermionic Quantum Dissipation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 050601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Exactc-Number Representation of Non-Markovian Quantum Dissipa- tion,

    J. T. Stockburger and H. Grabert, “Exactc-Number Representation of Non-Markovian Quantum Dissipa- tion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 170407 (2002)

    work page 2002

  27. [27]

    Hierarchy of stochastic pure states for open quantum system dynam- ics,

    D. Suess, A. Eisfeld, and W. T. Strunz, “Hierarchy of stochastic pure states for open quantum system dynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 150403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Taming the Dynamical Sign Problem in Real-Time Evo- 10 lution of Quantum Many-Body Problems,

    G. Cohen, E. Gull, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, “Taming the Dynamical Sign Problem in Real-Time Evo- 10 lution of Quantum Many-Body Problems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 266802 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Quantum Monte Carlo Method in the Steady State,

    A. Erpenbeck, E. Gull, and G. Cohen, “Quantum Monte Carlo Method in the Steady State,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 186301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Hybrid NRG-DMRG approach to real- time dynamics of quantum impurity systems,

    F. G¨ uttge, F. B. Anders, U. Schollw¨ ock, E. Eidelstein, and A. Schiller, “Hybrid NRG-DMRG approach to real- time dynamics of quantum impurity systems,” Phys. Rev. B87, 115115 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Time-Dependent Density-Matrix Renormalization Group: A Systematic Method for the Study of Quantum Many-Body Out- of-Equilibrium Systems,

    M. A. Cazalilla and J. B. Marston, “Time-Dependent Density-Matrix Renormalization Group: A Systematic Method for the Study of Quantum Many-Body Out- of-Equilibrium Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 256403 (2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Colloquium: Multiconfigurational time- dependent Hartree approaches for indistinguishable par- ticles,

    A. U. J. Lode, C. L´ evˆ eque, L. B. Madsen, A. I. Streltsov, and O. E. Alon, “Colloquium: Multiconfigurational time- dependent Hartree approaches for indistinguishable par- ticles,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 011001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Numerically exact quantum dynamics for indistinguishable particles: The multilayer multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree theory in sec- ond quantization representation,

    H. Wang and M. Thoss, “Numerically exact quantum dynamics for indistinguishable particles: The multilayer multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree theory in sec- ond quantization representation,” J. Chem. Phys.131, 024114 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Simulation methods for open quantum many-body systems,

    H. Weimer, A. Kshetrimayum, and R. Or´ us, “Simulation methods for open quantum many-body systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Dissipatons as generalized Brownian par- ticles for open quantum systems: Dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation,

    X. Li, Y. Su, Z.-H. Chen, Y. Wang, R.-X. Xu, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, “Dissipatons as generalized Brownian par- ticles for open quantum systems: Dissipaton-embedded quantum master equation,” J. Chem. Phys.158(2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Theory of open quantum systems with bath of electrons and phonons and spins: Many-dissipaton den- sity matrixes approach,

    Y. Yan, “Theory of open quantum systems with bath of electrons and phonons and spins: Many-dissipaton den- sity matrixes approach,” J. Chem. Phys.140, 054105 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Toward quantum simulation of non-Markovian open quantum dynamics: A universal and compact theory,

    X. Li, S. Lyu, Y. Wang, R. Xu, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, “Toward quantum simulation of non-Markovian open quantum dynamics: A universal and compact theory,” Phys. Rev. A110, 032620 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    A hybrid stochastic hierar- chy equations of motion approach to treat the low tem- perature dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum sys- tems,

    J. M. Moix and J. Cao, “A hybrid stochastic hierar- chy equations of motion approach to treat the low tem- perature dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum sys- tems,” J. Chem. Phys.139, 134106 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Zero-temperature localization in a sub-ohmic spin-boson model investigated by an extended hierarchy equation of motion,

    C. Duan, Z. Tang, J. Cao, and J. Wu, “Zero-temperature localization in a sub-ohmic spin-boson model investigated by an extended hierarchy equation of motion,” Phys. Rev. B95, 214308 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    A unified stochastic formulation of dissipative quantum dynamics. I. Generalized hierar- chical equations,

    C.-Y. Hsieh and J. Cao, “A unified stochastic formulation of dissipative quantum dynamics. I. Generalized hierar- chical equations,” J. Chem. Phys.148, 014103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Multilayer formulation of the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree theory,

    H. Wang and M. Thoss, “Multilayer formulation of the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree theory,” J. Chem. Phys.119, 1289 (2003)

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Time evolution of a quan- tum system in contact with a nearly Gaussian-Markovian noise bath,

    Y. Tanimura and R. Kubo, “Time evolution of a quan- tum system in contact with a nearly Gaussian-Markovian noise bath,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.58, 101 (1989)

    work page 1989

  43. [43]

    Hierarchical approach based on stochastic decoupling to dissipative systems,

    Y. an Yan, F. Yang, Y. Liu, and J. Shao, “Hierarchical approach based on stochastic decoupling to dissipative systems,” Chem. Phys. Lett.395, 216 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Exact dynamics of dissi- pative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hier- archical equations of motion approach,

    J. Jin, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, “Exact dynamics of dissi- pative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hier- archical equations of motion approach,” J. Chem. Phys. 128, 234703 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Hierarchical Liouville-Space Approach for Ac- curate and Universal Characterization of Quantum Im- purity Systems,

    Z. Li, N. Tong, X. Zheng, D. Hou, J. Wei, J. Hu, and Y. Yan, “Hierarchical Liouville-Space Approach for Ac- curate and Universal Characterization of Quantum Im- purity Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 266403 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity,

    B. M. Garraway, “Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity,” Phys. Rev. A55, 2290 (1997)

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    Pseudofermion method for the exact description of fermionic environ- ments: From single-molecule electronics to the Kondo resonance,

    M. Cirio, N. Lambert, P. Liang, P. Kuo, Y. Chen, P. Menczel, K. Funo, and F. Nori, “Pseudofermion method for the exact description of fermionic environ- ments: From single-molecule electronics to the Kondo resonance,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033011 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Non-Markovian quantum ex- ceptional points,

    J.-D. Lin, P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, “Non-Markovian quantum ex- ceptional points,” Nat. Commun.16, 1289 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Generalized theory of pseudomodes for exact descrip- tions of non-Markovian quantum processes,

    G. Pleasance, B. M. Garraway, and F. Petruccione, “Generalized theory of pseudomodes for exact descrip- tions of non-Markovian quantum processes,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Matrix prod- uct states, projected entangled pair states, and varia- tional renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems,

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, “Matrix prod- uct states, projected entangled pair states, and varia- tional renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems,” Advances in physics57, 143 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,

    U. Schollw¨ ock, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Annals of physics326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    A practical introduction to tensor net- works: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,

    R. Or´ us, “A practical introduction to tensor net- works: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,” Annals of physics349, 117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Efficient propaga- tion of the hierarchical equations of motion using the ma- trix product state method,

    Q. Shi, Y. Xu, Y. Yan, and M. Xu, “Efficient propaga- tion of the hierarchical equations of motion using the ma- trix product state method,” J. Chem. Phys.148, 174102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Solving the quantum many- body problem with artificial neural networks,

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, “Solving the quantum many- body problem with artificial neural networks,” Science 355, 602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Quantum Many-Body Dynam- ics in Two Dimensions with Artificial Neural Networks,

    M. Schmitt and M. Heyl, “Quantum Many-Body Dynam- ics in Two Dimensions with Artificial Neural Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 100503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Neural-Network Ap- proach to Dissipative Quantum Many-Body Dynamics,

    M. J. Hartmann and G. Carleo, “Neural-Network Ap- proach to Dissipative Quantum Many-Body Dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 250502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Variational Quantum Monte Carlo Method with a Neural-Network Ansatz for Open Quantum Systems,

    A. Nagy and V. Savona, “Variational Quantum Monte Carlo Method with a Neural-Network Ansatz for Open Quantum Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 250501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Variational Neural-Network Ansatz for Steady States in Open Quantum Systems,

    F. Vicentini, A. Biella, N. Regnault, and C. Ciuti, “Variational Neural-Network Ansatz for Steady States in Open Quantum Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 250503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Constructing neural sta- tionary states for open quantum many-body systems,

    N. Yoshioka and R. Hamazaki, “Constructing neural sta- tionary states for open quantum many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. B99, 214306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Simulating non-Markovian open quantum dynamics with neural quantum states,

    L. Cao, L. Ge, D. Zhang, X. Li, J. Pan, Y. Wang, R.-X. Xu, Y. Yan, and X. Zheng, “Simulating non-Markovian open quantum dynamics with neural quantum states,” Physical Review B113, L140301 (2026)

    work page 2026

  61. [61]

    Simulating many-body open quantum systems by harnessing the power of ar- tificial intelligence and quantum computing,

    L. Ye, Y. Wang, and X. Zheng, “Simulating many-body open quantum systems by harnessing the power of ar- tificial intelligence and quantum computing,” J. Chem. Phys.162, 120901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Hierarchical equations of motion approach to hybrid fermionic and bosonic en- vironments: Matrix product state formulation in twin space,

    Y. Ke, R. Borrelli, and M. Thoss, “Hierarchical equations of motion approach to hybrid fermionic and bosonic en- vironments: Matrix product state formulation in twin space,” J. Chem. Phys.156, 194102 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Tree tensor network state approach for solving hierarchical equations of motion,

    Y. Ke, “Tree tensor network state approach for solving hierarchical equations of motion,” J. Chem. Phys.158, 211102 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Nonadiabatic quantum dynamics of molecules scattering from metal surfaces,

    R. J. Preston, Y. Ke, S. L. Rudge, N. Hertl, R. Borrelli, R. J. Maurer, and M. Thoss, “Nonadiabatic quantum dynamics of molecules scattering from metal surfaces,” 11 J. Chem. Theory Comput.21, 1054 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Artificial-intelligence-based surrogate solution of dissi- pative quantum dynamics: physics-informed reconstruc- tion of the universal propagator,

    J. Zhang, C. L. Benavides-Riveros, and L. Chen, “Artificial-intelligence-based surrogate solution of dissi- pative quantum dynamics: physics-informed reconstruc- tion of the universal propagator,” The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry Letters15, 3603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Neural network solution of non-Markovian quantum state dif- fusion and operator construction of quantum stochastic process,

    J. Zhang, C. L. Benavides-Riveros, and L. Chen, “Neural network solution of non-Markovian quantum state dif- fusion and operator construction of quantum stochastic process,” The Journal of Chemical Physics163(2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Time-dependent variational principle for open quantum systems with ar- tificial neural networks,

    M. Reh, M. Schmitt, and M. G¨ arttner, “Time-dependent variational principle for open quantum systems with ar- tificial neural networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 230501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Deep hidden physics models: Deep learn- ing of nonlinear partial differential equations,

    M. Raissi, “Deep hidden physics models: Deep learn- ing of nonlinear partial differential equations,” J. Mach. Learn. Res.19, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    A dual-dimer method for training physics-constrained neural networks with minimax archi- tecture,

    D. Liu and Y. Wang, “A dual-dimer method for training physics-constrained neural networks with minimax archi- tecture,” Neural Networks136, 112 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    hp- VPINNs: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition,

    E. Kharazmi, Z. Zhang, and G. E. Karniadakis, “hp- VPINNs: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition,” Computer Methods in Ap- plied Mechanics and Engineering374, 113547 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Conservative physics-informed neural networks on dis- crete domains for conservation laws: Applications to for- ward and inverse problems,

    A. D. Jagtap, E. Kharazmi, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Conservative physics-informed neural networks on dis- crete domains for conservation laws: Applications to for- ward and inverse problems,” Computer Methods in Ap- plied Mechanics and Engineering365, 113028 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Scientific machine learn- ing through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,

    S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, “Scientific machine learn- ing through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,” J. Sci. Comput.92, 88 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Time-dependent neural Galerkin method for quantum dynamics,

    A. Sinibaldi, D. Hendry, F. Vicentini, and G. Carleo, “Time-dependent neural Galerkin method for quantum dynamics,” Physical Review Letters136, 120402 (2026)

    work page 2026

  74. [74]

    Many- body dynamics with explicitly time-dependent neural quantum states,

    A. Van de Walle, M. Schmitt, and A. Bohrdt, “Many- body dynamics with explicitly time-dependent neural quantum states,” Machine Learning: Science and Tech- nology6, 045011 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Physics- informed neural networks and beyond: enforcing physi- cal constraints in quantum dissipative dynamics,

    A. Ullah, Y. Huang, M. Yang, and P. O. Dral, “Physics- informed neural networks and beyond: enforcing physi- cal constraints in quantum dissipative dynamics,” Digital Discovery3, 2052 (2024)

    work page 2052

  76. [76]

    Machine learning meets su (n) Lie algebra: Enhancing quantum dynamics learn- ing with exact trace conservation,

    A. Ullah and J. O. Richardson, “Machine learning meets su (n) Lie algebra: Enhancing quantum dynamics learn- ing with exact trace conservation,” The Journal of Chem- ical Physics162(2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Toward quantum-aware machine learning: Improved prediction of quantum dis- sipative dynamics via complex valued neural networks,

    M. Atif, A. Ullah, and M. Yang, “Toward quantum-aware machine learning: Improved prediction of quantum dis- sipative dynamics via complex valued neural networks,” The Journal of Chemical Physics164(2026)

    work page 2026

  78. [78]

    O. M. Dugan, P. Y. Lu, R. Dangovski, D. Luo, and M. Soljacic, Q-flow: generative modeling for differential equations of open quantum dynamics with normalizing flows, inInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8879–8901, PMLR, 2023

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Localized Magnetic States in Metals,

    P. W. Anderson, “Localized Magnetic States in Metals,” Phys. Rev.124, 41 (1961)

    work page 1961

  80. [80]

    Communication: Pad´ e spectrum decomposition of Fermi function and Bose func- tion,

    J. Hu, R.-X. Xu, and Y. Yan, “Communication: Pad´ e spectrum decomposition of Fermi function and Bose func- tion,” J. Chem. Phys.133, 101106 (2010)

    work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.