pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.08515 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Defect-induced multiferroicity in bulk solid solutions of WSe₂ and WTe₂

H. Rojas-P\'aez , G. Villab\'on-Linares , J. Pazos , E. Ramos , R. Moreno , O. Herrera-Sandoval , J. A. Galvis , P. Giraldo-Gallo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords multiferroicitytungsten dichalcogenideschalcogen vacanciesferroelectricityferromagnetismsolid solutionsdefect engineeringphase diagram
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chalcogen vacancies above 20 percent induce room-temperature multiferroic order in bulk W(Se,Te)2 crystals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In bulk single crystals of W(Se1-xTex)2 with variable tellurium fraction x and chalcogen vacancy fraction delta, the paper shows that delta greater than 20 percent produces both switchable ferroelectric polarization and ferromagnetic order at room temperature. Tellurium concentration x mainly sets whether the lattice adopts 2H or 1Td symmetry, crossing over near 18 percent Te, but the ferroic responses appear only when vacancy density is high. Piezoresponse force microscopy detects reversible domains in the defective regime while magnetometry shows net magnetization, and the two parameters together define a configurational phase diagram. The central result is that vacancy engineering alone, rather than interfaces or external fields, is sufficient to create coexisting electric and magnetic order in these bulk layered materials.

Core claim

In W(Se1-xTex)2(1-delta) crystals grown by chemical vapor transport, increasing the chalcogen vacancy fraction delta above 20 percent produces switchable ferroelectricity observed by piezoresponse force microscopy together with ferromagnetic behavior measured by magnetometry, while the Te concentration x controls a structural transition from 2H to 1Td symmetry near x = 0.18. Stoichiometric samples remain piezoelectric and paramagnetic; only the high-delta compositions exhibit the simultaneous presence of both ferroic orders at room temperature. The study concludes that x governs symmetry and delta governs the emergence of multiferroicity.

What carries the argument

Chalcogen vacancy fraction delta, which independently triggers both switchable ferroelectric domains and net ferromagnetism once it exceeds approximately 20 percent.

If this is right

  • Delta values above 20 percent reliably produce both ferroelectric switching and spontaneous magnetization in the same bulk crystal at room temperature.
  • The structural 2H-to-1Td transition occurs at fixed xc approximately 18 percent independent of delta, yet does not by itself generate either ferroic response.
  • Vacancy concentration can be used as the primary control knob to cross from piezoelectric-paramagnetic to multiferroic regions on the two-parameter phase diagram.
  • Chemical vapor transport synthesis allows systematic mapping of how dopant and defect levels jointly determine ferroic behavior in transition-metal dichalcogenide solid solutions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same vacancy threshold might activate multiferroicity in other TMDC solid solutions if equivalent defect densities can be stabilized in bulk form.
  • Local defect states that break inversion symmetry while carrying unpaired spins offer a plausible microscopic route, suggesting that similar defect engineering could be tested in related layered compounds.
  • Because the multiferroic state appears in macroscopic crystals, thicker devices or heterostructures could be fabricated without relying on monolayer interfaces.
  • Direct measurement of magnetoelectric coupling under simultaneous electric and magnetic fields would test whether the two orders interact or remain independent.

Load-bearing premise

The observed switchable ferroelectric and ferromagnetic signals are produced by the chalcogen vacancies distributed through the bulk crystal volume rather than by surfaces, impurities, or experimental artifacts.

What would settle it

Freshly cleaved interior surfaces of high-delta crystals that show no reversible piezoresponse domains under an applied electric field, or the same crystals that exhibit only linear paramagnetic magnetization without hysteresis, would falsify the claim that vacancies intrinsically generate multiferroic order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08515 by E. Ramos, G. Villab\'on-Linares, H. Rojas-P\'aez, J. A. Galvis, J. Pazos, O. Herrera-Sandoval, P. Giraldo-Gallo, R. Moreno.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetization hysteresis loops at 300 K for W[Te [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. SS-PFM piezoresponse phase and amplitude loops at 300 K for W[Te [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Para/ferro-magnetic/electric regions represented in (a) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the formation energies of various point de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides provide a versatile platform for tunable ferroic phenomena at the atomic scale owing to their reduced dimensionality. Here we investigate the structural, magnetic, and ferroelectric properties of bulk solid solution W(Se1-xTex)2(1-delta) single crystals synthesized by chemical vapor transport. The room temperature behavior is analyzed as a function of tellurium concentration (x) and chalcogen defect fraction (delta). X ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy reveal lattice expansion and symmetry reduction with increasing x, consistent with a 2H to 1Td structural transition above a critical composition xc about 18 percent. Piezoresponse force microscopy identifies piezoelectricity near stoichiometric compositions (delta less than 5 percent) and switchable ferroelectricity in the chalcogen deficient regime (delta greater than 20 percent). Magnetometry measurements show a corresponding evolution from paramagnetic to ferromagnetic behavior with increasing delta. Near stoichiometric Te poor samples exhibit piezoelectric and paramagnetic responses, whereas multiferroic states characterized by the coexistence of ferroelectric and ferromagnetic responses emerge at high vacancy concentrations. The performed characterizations indicate that x primarily governs structural symmetry, while delta controls the emergence of both ferromagnetic and ferroelectric responses. These trends are summarized in a configurational phase diagram highlighting the cooperative influence of dopants and defects on ferroic behavior. Overall, controlled stoichiometry and vacancy engineering offer an effective strategy to tailor ferroic responses in transition metal dichalcogenides.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of bulk W(Se_{1-x}Te_x)_2(1-δ) single crystals by chemical vapor transport and characterizes their structural, ferroelectric, and magnetic properties as functions of Te concentration x and chalcogen vacancy fraction δ. XRD and Raman data indicate a 2H-to-1Td transition above x_c ≈ 18%. PFM shows piezoelectricity at low δ (<5%) and switchable ferroelectricity at high δ (>20%), while magnetometry shows a paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic crossover with increasing δ. The authors conclude that δ primarily drives the emergence of coexisting ferroelectric and ferromagnetic responses, yielding multiferroicity, and present a configurational phase diagram.

Significance. If the central claim of intrinsic, bulk multiferroicity holds, the work would establish vacancy engineering as a practical route to induce and control multiferroic order in TMD solid solutions, extending defect-based tuning strategies beyond the usual doping or strain approaches. The experimental mapping of structural symmetry (controlled by x) versus ferroic order (controlled by δ) supplies a useful phase diagram for the community.

major comments (3)
  1. [ferroelectric properties / PFM measurements] The ferroelectric component of the multiferroic claim rests exclusively on PFM data (described in the ferroelectric properties section). PFM is surface-sensitive (probe depth ~nm), whereas magnetometry is volume-averaged; no bulk-sensitive ferroelectric probes (P-E hysteresis, pyroelectric current, or SHG) are reported. This leaves open whether the switchable polarization exists throughout the crystal volume at δ > 20% or is confined to surface layers, directly undermining the bulk multiferroicity assertion.
  2. [results and discussion] Quantitative support for the claimed trends and phase boundaries is absent. The abstract and results sections summarize qualitative evolution of XRD, Raman, PFM, and magnetometry signals with x and δ but supply no extracted lattice parameters with uncertainties, no PFM amplitude/phase histograms with statistics, no magnetization values or transition temperatures with error bars, and no sample-to-sample reproducibility metrics. This weakens the robustness of the configurational phase diagram.
  3. [magnetometry and multiferroic claims] Possible extrinsic origins for the high-δ responses are not addressed. The manuscript does not discuss or rule out surface reconstruction, adsorbates, or unintended impurities that could produce apparent switchable PFM contrast and ferromagnetic signals, particularly given the high vacancy concentrations where such effects are known to appear in TMDs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The chemical formula in the abstract and title is written without proper subscript formatting (W(Se1-xTex)2(1-delta)); consistent LaTeX-style notation should be used throughout.
  2. [structural characterization] The value x_c ≈ 18% is stated without specifying the precise criterion (e.g., peak splitting threshold in XRD or Raman mode softening) or showing the raw data used to locate it.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below and revised the manuscript where possible to improve clarity, add quantitative details, and discuss limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The ferroelectric component of the multiferroic claim rests exclusively on PFM data (described in the ferroelectric properties section). PFM is surface-sensitive (probe depth ~nm), whereas magnetometry is volume-averaged; no bulk-sensitive ferroelectric probes (P-E hysteresis, pyroelectric current, or SHG) are reported. This leaves open whether the switchable polarization exists throughout the crystal volume at δ > 20% or is confined to surface layers, directly undermining the bulk multiferroicity assertion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that PFM probes only the near-surface region and that bulk ferroelectric measurements such as P-E hysteresis loops were not performed. The chalcogen vacancies are distributed uniformly through the bulk as evidenced by the CVT growth process and bulk-sensitive XRD/EDX data showing consistent stoichiometry and lattice expansion. Switchable PFM contrast was reproducibly observed on multiple freshly cleaved surfaces from different crystals. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit discussion of this surface-vs-bulk distinction, citing supporting literature on defect-induced ferroelectricity in TMDs, and we note the practical difficulties (sample geometry and leakage at high δ) that precluded P-E measurements. We therefore mark this as a partial revision: the limitation is now clearly stated while the overall interpretation is retained on the basis of the combined structural, magnetic, and PFM evidence. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Quantitative support for the claimed trends and phase boundaries is absent. The abstract and results sections summarize qualitative evolution of XRD, Raman, PFM, and magnetometry signals with x and δ but supply no extracted lattice parameters with uncertainties, no PFM amplitude/phase histograms with statistics, no magnetization values or transition temperatures with error bars, and no sample-to-sample reproducibility metrics. This weakens the robustness of the configurational phase diagram.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript we have extracted and tabulated lattice parameters (a, c) from Rietveld refinement of XRD data with standard uncertainties, added statistical histograms and mean amplitude/phase values with standard deviations for the PFM data sets, reported saturation magnetization and estimated Curie temperatures with error bars derived from multiple temperature sweeps, and included a reproducibility table summarizing results across three independent growth batches. The configurational phase diagram has been updated with these quantitative boundaries and error estimates. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Possible extrinsic origins for the high-δ responses are not addressed. The manuscript does not discuss or rule out surface reconstruction, adsorbates, or unintended impurities that could produce apparent switchable PFM contrast and ferromagnetic signals, particularly given the high vacancy concentrations where such effects are known to appear in TMDs.

    Authors: We have added a new paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly addresses potential extrinsic contributions. All PFM and magnetometry data were acquired on freshly cleaved surfaces under inert or vacuum conditions; the ferromagnetic moment scales linearly with bulk-determined δ (from EDX) rather than showing surface-only dependence; control samples with δ < 5 % exhibit neither switchable PFM nor ferromagnetism; and the structural 2H–1Td transition remains consistent with bulk XRD. These observations, together with references to prior defect-magnetism studies in TMDs, are now used to argue against common extrinsic sources such as adsorbates or reconstruction. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of bulk-sensitive ferroelectric measurements (P-E loops, pyroelectric current, or SHG) that would require new experiments beyond the scope of the current revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurements without derivations or predictions

full rationale

The manuscript presents direct experimental data from XRD, Raman spectroscopy, PFM, and magnetometry on W(Se1-xTex)2(1-delta) crystals. No equations, fitted parameters, predictive models, or derivation chains appear in the provided text. Structural transitions, piezoelectricity, ferroelectric switching, and magnetism are reported as observed trends versus x and delta, summarized in a phase diagram that simply organizes the measurements. No self-citations, ansatze, or uniqueness theorems are invoked to support load-bearing claims. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard interpretations of established experimental techniques rather than new theoretical constructs, fitted parameters, or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard interpretations of PFM signals as intrinsic ferroelectricity and magnetometry signals as bulk ferromagnetism hold for these samples.
    The paper relies on conventional assignment of measurement outputs without additional validation steps described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5608 in / 1369 out tokens · 135240 ms · 2026-05-15T14:58:11.001206+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Synthesis of single crystals 2.2

    Materials and Methods 2.1. Synthesis of single crystals 2.2. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) Elemental compositions were determined by X-ray fluo- rescence (XRF) using a PANalytical Epsilon 3XLE spec- trometer. As-grown single crystals from each batch were se- lected to minimize contamination from Te-rich segregates or residual precursor material. Measured mass ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy are then used to analyze symmetry changes and lattice distortions across the series

    Results and discussion We begin by establishing the compositional phase space of W(TexSe1−x)2(1−δ) and its structural evolution with Te substitution and chalcogen vacancy concentration. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy are then used to analyze symmetry changes and lattice distortions across the series. Finally, we examine how these structural modi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Figure 6 (a) shows the fer- roic phase diagram in(x, δ), with all samples retaining 2H- WSe2 symmetry, while Fig

    Ferroic Phase Diagram To investigate ferroic states in W(Se,Te)2, we constructed configurational phase diagrams in compositional spaces de- fined by( nTe nW , nSe nW )and(x, δ). Figure 6 (a) shows the fer- roic phase diagram in(x, δ), with all samples retaining 2H- WSe2 symmetry, while Fig. 6 (b) presents the same trends in absolute compositional ratios. ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    In the composition range investigated (x≤x C), the crystal retains 2H sym- metry, and no structural phase transition is detected

    Discussion The phase diagram behavior of W(Se,Te) 2 can be under- stood within a hierarchical framework separating structural, electronic, and geometric contributions. In the composition range investigated (x≤x C), the crystal retains 2H sym- metry, and no structural phase transition is detected. The observed ferroic responses therefore originate from def...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This separation of roles is consistent with recent reports of room-temperature multiferroicity in Te-doped WSe2 [47], where multiferroicity emerges for20%≲δ≲38%

    Summary and Conclusions Our results establish that ferroic behavior in W(Se,Te)2 is primarily governed by chalcogen-site occupancyδ, whereas Te fractionxcontrols structural symmetry. This separation of roles is consistent with recent reports of room-temperature multiferroicity in Te-doped WSe2 [47], where multiferroicity emerges for20%≲δ≲38%. In contrast,...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Defect classification To clarify the microscopic origins of stoichiometric devi- ation, we consider the crystallographic point defects that can occur in transition metal dichalcogenides of the form MX 2 (M = transition metal, X = chalcogen). Six fundamental types of isolated point defects are typ- ically distinguished:(1)chalcogen vacancies [□ X],(2) meta...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Defect energetics Although defects may be randomly distributed throughout the crystal, their equilibrium concentrations are governed by their formation energies. Within a thermodynamic frame- work, the probability of occurrence of a defect D i with for- mation energyE (i) f follows a Boltzmann factor, P(D i)∝exp − E(i) f kBTG ! ,(B1) wherek B is the Boltz...

    work page

  8. [8]

    N. A. Spaldin, S.-W. Cheong, and R. Ramesh, Multiferroics: Past, present, and future, Physics today63, 38 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Fiebig, T

    M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Meier, and M. Trassin, The evolution of multiferroics, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    N. A. Hill, Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics?, The journal of physical chemistry B104, 6694 (2000)

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    N. A. Spaldin, Fundamental size limits in ferroelectricity, Science304, 1606 (2004)

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, Journal of physics D: applied physics38, R123 (2005)

    M. Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, Journal of physics D: applied physics38, R123 (2005)

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    Barone and S

    P. Barone and S. Picozzi, Mechanisms and origin of multifer- roicity, Comptes Rendus. Physique16, 143 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    J. Wang, J. Neaton, H. Zheng, V . Nagarajan, S. Ogale, B. Liu, D. Viehland, V . Vaithyanathan, D. Schlom, U. Waghmare, et al., Epitaxial bifeo3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures, science299, 1719 (2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    B. B. Van Aken, T. T. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. A. Spaldin, The origin of ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric ymno3, Na- ture materials3, 164 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Ikeda, H

    N. Ikeda, H. Ohsumi, K. Ohwada, K. Ishii, T. Inami, K. Kakurai, Y . Murakami, K. Yoshii, S. Mori, Y . Horibe, et al., Ferroelectricity from iron valence ordering in the charge-frustrated system lufe2o4, Nature436, 1136 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Van Den Brink and D

    J. Van Den Brink and D. I. Khomskii, Multiferroicity due to charge ordering, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 434217 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T.-h. Arima, and Y . Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization, nature426, 55 (2003)

    work page 2003

  19. [19]

    Y . Choi, H. Yi, S. Lee, Q. Huang, V . Kiryukhin, and S.-W. Cheong, Ferroelectricity in an ising chain magnet, Physical review letters100, 047601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Esquinazi, W

    P. Esquinazi, W. Hergert, D. Spemann, A. Setzer, and A. Ernst, Defect-induced magnetism in solids, IEEE Trans- actions on Magnetics49, 4668 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    P. D. Esquinazi, W. Hergert, M. Stiller, L. Botsch, H. Ohldag, D. Spemann, M. Hoffmann, W. A. Adeagbo, A. Chassé, S. K. Nayak,et al., Defect-induced magnetism in nonmag- netic oxides: Basic principles, experimental evidence, and possible devices with zno and tio2, physica status solidi (b) 257, 1900623 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    A. D. Rata, J. Herrero-Martin, I. V . Maznichenko, F. M. Chiabrera, R. T. Dahm, S. Ostanin, D. Lee, B. Jalan, P. Buczek, I. Mertig,et al., Defect-induced magnetism in ho- moepitaxial srtio3, APL materials10(2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Zviagin, C

    V . Zviagin, C. Sturm, P. Esquinazi, M. Grundmann, and R. Schmidt-Grund, Control of magnetic properties in spinel znfe2o4 thin films through intrinsic defect manipulation, Journal of Applied Physics128(2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Bannikov, I

    V . Bannikov, I. Shein, V . Kozhevnikov, and A. Ivanovskii, Magnetism without magnetic ions in non-magnetic per- ovskites srtio3, srzro3 and srsno3, Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials320, 936 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    K. T. Kang, H. I. Seo, O. Kwon, K. Lee, J.-S. Bae, M.-W. Chu, S. C. Chae, Y . Kim, and W. S. Choi, Ferroelectricity in srtio3 epitaxial thin films via sr-vacancy-induced tetragonal- ity, Applied Surface Science499, 143930 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    T. Wang, L. He, Y . Deng, Q. Zheng, F. Xie, C. Xu, and D. Lin, Defect-driven evolution of piezoelectric and ferro- electric properties in cusb2o6-doped k0.5na0.5nbo3 lead-free ceramics, Journal of the American Ceramic Society100, 5610 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    S. Ning, A. Kumar, K. Klyukin, E. Cho, J. H. Kim, T. Su, H.-S. Kim, J. M. LeBeau, B. Yildiz, and C. A. Ross, An an- tisite defect mechanism for room temperature ferroelectricity in orthoferrites, Nature communications12, 4298 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    S. V . Kalinin and N. A. Spaldin, Functional ion defects in transition metal oxides, Science341, 858 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Gunkel, D

    F. Gunkel, D. V . Christensen, Y . Chen, and N. Pryds, Oxy- gen vacancies: The (in) visible friend of oxide electronics, Applied physics letters116(2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    K. A. Hunnestad, H. Das, C. Hatzoglou, M. Holtz, C. M. Brooks, A. T. van Helvoort, D. A. Muller, D. G. Schlom, J. A. Mundy, and D. Meier, 3d oxygen vacancy distribution and 16 defect-property relations in an oxide heterostructure, Nature Communications15, 5400 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    I. S. Golovina, S. P. Kolesnik, V . P. Bryksa, V . Strelchuk, I. B. Yanchuk, I. N. Geifman, S. Khainakov, S. V . Svechnikov, and A. N. Morozovska, Defect driven ferroelectricity and mag- netism in nanocrystalline ktao3, Physica B: Condensed Mat- ter407, 614 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Aizu, Possible species of ferroelectrics, Physical Review 146, 423 (1966)

    K. Aizu, Possible species of ferroelectrics, Physical Review 146, 423 (1966)

    work page 1966

  33. [33]

    Aizu, Possible species of ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, and ferroelastic crystals, Physical Review B2, 754 (1970)

    K. Aizu, Possible species of ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, and ferroelastic crystals, Physical Review B2, 754 (1970)

    work page 1970

  34. [34]

    Junquera and P

    J. Junquera and P. Ghosez, Critical thickness for ferroelec- tricity in perovskite ultrathin films, Nature422, 506 (2003)

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Nishino, T

    R. Nishino, T. C. Fujita, F. Kagawa, and M. Kawasaki, Evo- lution of ferroelectricity in ultrathin pbtio3 films as revealed by electric double layer gating, Scientific Reports10, 10864 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Cudazzo, I

    P. Cudazzo, I. V . Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 085406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Z. Fei, W. Zhao, T. A. Palomaki, B. Sun, M. K. Miller, Z. Zhao, J. Yan, X. Xu, and D. H. Cobden, Ferroelec- tric switching of a two-dimensional metal, Nature560, 336 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    J. Hong, Z. Hu, M. Probert, K. Li, D. Lv, X. Yang, L. Gu, N. Mao, Q. Feng, L. Xie,et al., Exploring atomic defects in molybdenum disulphide monolayers, Nature communica- tions6, 6293 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    S. C. de la Barrera, Q. Cao, Y . Gao, Y . Gao, V . S. Bheemarasetty, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, W. Zhu, D. Xiao, and B. M. Hunt, Direct measurement of ferroelectric polar- ization in a tunable semimetal, Nature communications12, 5298 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    H. Yang, L. Pan, M. Xiao, J. Fang, Y . Cui, and Z. Wei, Iron- doping induced multiferroic in two-dimensional in2se3, SCI- ENCE CHINA-MATERIALS63, 421 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Q. Song, C. A. Occhialini, E. Ergeçen, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso, P. Barone, J. Kapeghian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. S. Botana,et al., Evidence for a single-layer van der waals mul- tiferroic, Nature602, 601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Y . Lai, Z. Song, Y . Wan, M. Xue, C. Wang, Y . Ye, L. Dai, Z. Zhang, W. Yang, H. Du,et al., Two-dimensional ferro- magnetism and driven ferroelectricity in van der waals cucrp 2 s 6, Nanoscale11, 5163 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    R. Du, Y . Wang, M. Cheng, P. Wang, H. Li, W. Feng, L. Song, J. Shi, and J. He, Two-dimensional multiferroic ma- terial of metallic p-doped snse, Nature Communications13, 6130 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Tahir, S

    R. Tahir, S. A. Zahra, U. Naeem, D. Akinwande, and S. Rizwan, First observation on emergence of strong room- temperature ferroelectricity and multiferroicity in 2d-ti 3 c 2 t x free-standing mxene film, RSC advances12, 24571 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Z. Sun, Y . Su, A. Zhi, Z. Gao, X. Han, K. Wu, L. Bao, Y . Huang, Y . Shi, X. Bai,et al., Evidence for multiferroic- ity in single-layer cucrse2, Nature Communications15, 4252 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    C. De, Y . Liu, S. V . G. Ayyagari, B. Zheng, K. P. Kelley, S. Hazra, J. He, S. Pawledzio, S. Mali, S. Guchhait,et al., Discovery of a layered multiferroic compound cu1- x mn1+ y site3 with strong magnetoelectric coupling, Science Ad- vances11, eadp9379 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    X. Yang, Z. Hu, X. Shao, and F. Zheng, Multiferroicity in two dimensional co2cl2 monolayer, Communications Mate- rials6, 131 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V . Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    A. V . Kolobov and J. Tominaga,Two-dimensional transition- metal dichalcogenides, V ol. 239 (Springer, 2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    A. Kuc, T. Heine, and A. Kis, Electronic properties of transition-metal dichalcogenides, MRS bulletin40, 577 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Sharma, F.-X

    P. Sharma, F.-X. Xiang, D.-F. Shao, D. Zhang, E. Y . Tsymbal, A. R. Hamilton, and J. Seidel, A room-temperature ferroelec- tric semimetal, Science advances5, eaax5080 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    S. W. Han, Y . H. Hwang, S.-H. Kim, W. S. Yun, J. D. Lee, M. G. Park, S. Ryu, J. S. Park, D.-H. Yoo, S.-P. Yoon,et al., Controlling ferromagnetic easy axis in a layered mos 2 single crystal, Physical review letters110, 247201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    S. J. Yun, B. W. Cho, T. Dinesh, D. H. Yang, Y . I. Kim, J. W. Jin, S.-H. Yang, T. D. Nguyen, Y .-M. Kim, K. K. Kim,et al., Escalating ferromagnetic order via se-vacancies near vana- dium in wse2 monolayers, Advanced Materials34, 2106551 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Cardenas-Chirivi, K

    G. Cardenas-Chirivi, K. Vega-Bustos, H. Rojas-Páez, D. Silvera-Vega, J. Pazos, O. Herrera, M. Macías, C. Espejo, W. López-Pérez, J. Galvis,et al., Room temperature multifer- roicity in a transition metal dichalcogenide, npj 2D Materials and Applications7, 54 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    L. Cai, J. He, Q. Liu, T. Yao, L. Chen, W. Yan, F. Hu, Y . Jiang, Y . Zhao, T. Hu,et al., Vacancy-induced ferromagnetism of mos2 nanosheets, Journal of the American Chemical Society 137, 2622 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    P. Tao, H. Guo, T. Yang, and Z. Zhang, Strain-induced mag- netism in mos2 monolayer with defects, Journal of Applied Physics115(2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Zhang, Y

    K. Zhang, Y . Pan, L. Wang, W.-N. Mei, and X. Wu, Extended 1d defect induced magnetism in 2d mos2 crystal, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 215302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Guguchia, A

    Z. Guguchia, A. Kerelsky, D. Edelberg, S. Banerjee, F. von Rohr, D. Scullion, M. Augustin, M. Scully, D. A. Rhodes, Z. Shermadini,et al., Magnetism in semiconducting molybdenum dichalcogenides, Science advances4, eaat3672 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Avsar, A

    A. Avsar, A. Ciarrocchi, M. Pizzochero, D. Unuchek, O. V . Yazyev, and A. Kis, Defect induced, layer-modulated mag- netism in ultrathin metallic ptse2, Nature nanotechnology14, 674 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Ortiz Jimenez, Y

    V . Ortiz Jimenez, Y . T. H. Pham, D. Zhou, M. Liu, F. A. Nugera, V . Kalappattil, T. Eggers, K. Hoang, D. L. Duong, M. Terrones,et al., Transition metal dichalcogenides: Mak- ing atomic-level magnetism tunable with light at room tem- perature, Advanced Science11, 2304792 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [62]

    Komsa, S

    H.-P. Komsa, S. Kurasch, O. Lehtinen, U. Kaiser, and A. V . Krasheninnikov, From point to extended defects in two- dimensional mos 2: Evolution of atomic structure under elec- tron irradiation, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics88, 035301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [63]

    S. N. Shirodkar and U. V . Waghmare, Emergence of ferro- electricity at a metal-semiconductor transition in a 1 t mono- layer of mos 2, Physical review letters112, 157601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [64]

    Y . Hu, L. Rogée, W. Wang, L. Zhuang, F. Shi, 17 H. Dong, S. Cai, B. K. Tay, and S. P. Lau, Extend- able piezo/ferroelectricity in nonstoichiometric 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Communications14, 8470 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [65]

    Y . Li, D. Legut, X. Liu, C. Lin, X. Feng, Z. Li, and Q. Zhang, Modulated ferromagnetism and electric polarization induced by surface vacancy in mx2 monolayers, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry C126, 8817 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [66]

    Huang, T

    X. Huang, T. Lin, Q. Liu, Z. Cheng, J. Du, J. Chen, L. Zhang, L. Shen, and Y . Chen, Machine learning-accelerated explo- ration of ferromagnetic-ferroelectric multiferroics in element substituted 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Re- view Materials9, 124417 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [67]

    X. Wang, K. Yasuda, Y . Zhang, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Inter- facial ferroelectricity in rhombohedral-stacked bilayer transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, Nature nanotechnology17, 367 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [68]

    Tiwari, M

    S. Tiwari, M. L. Van de Put, B. Sorée, and W. G. Vanden- berghe, Magnetic order and critical temperature of substitu- tionally doped transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, npj 2D Materials and Applications5, 54 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [69]

    Haldar, H

    S. Haldar, H. V ovusha, M. K. Yadav, O. Eriksson, and B. Sanyal, Systematic study of structural, electronic, and optical properties of atomic-scale defects in the two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides mx 2 (m= mo, w; x= s, se, te), Physical Review B92, 235408 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [70]

    B. F. Mentzen and M. Sienko, Preparation and x-ray study of mixed-anion tungsten dichalcogenides, Inorganic Chemistry 15, 2198 (1976)

    work page 1976

  70. [71]

    P. Man, L. Huang, J. Zhao, and T. H. Ly, Ferroic phases in two-dimensional materials, Chemical Reviews123, 10990 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [72]

    S. J. Yun, D. L. Duong, D. M. Ha, K. Singh, T. L. Phan, W. Choi, Y .-M. Kim, and Y . H. Lee, Ferromagnetic order at room temperature in monolayer wse2 semiconductor via vanadium dopant, Advanced Science7, 1903076 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [73]

    P. Yu, J. Lin, L. Sun, Q. L. Le, X. Yu, G. Gao, C.-H. Hsu, D. Wu, T.-R. Chang, Q. Zeng,et al., Metal–semiconductor phase-transition in wse2 (1-x) te2x monolayer, Advanced Materials29, 1603991 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [74]

    Kanchanavatee, A

    N. Kanchanavatee, A. Ektarawong, T. Pakornchote, B. Alling, S. Hodak, and T. Bovornratanaraks, Phase tran- sitions and suppression of magnetoresistance in wte2-xse x system., Journal of physics. Condensed Matter: an Institute of Physics Journal34(2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [75]

    S. M. Oliver, J. Young, S. Krylyuk, T. L. Reinecke, A. V . Davydov, and P. M. V ora, Valley phenomena in the candi- date phase change material wse2 (1-x) te2x, Communications physics3, 10 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [76]

    A. T. Barton, R. Yue, L. A. Walsh, G. Zhou, C. Cormier, C. M. Smyth, R. Addou, L. Colombo, R. M. Wallace, and C. L. Hinkle, Wse (2- x) tex alloys grown by molecular beam epitaxy, 2D Materials6, 045027 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [77]

    X. Qian, P. Jiang, P. Yu, X. Gu, Z. Liu, and R. Yang, Anisotropic thermal transport in van der waals layered alloys wse2 (1-x) te2x, Applied physics letters112(2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [78]

    Ataca, H

    C. Ataca, H. Sahin, and S. Ciraci, Stable, single-layer mx2 transition-metal oxides and dichalcogenides in a honeycomb- like structure, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C116, 8983 (2012)

    work page 2012

  78. [79]

    O. V . Yazyev, Emergence of magnetism in graphene mate- rials and nanostructures, Reports on Progress in Physics73, 056501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  79. [80]

    Tongay, S

    S. Tongay, S. S. Varnoosfaderani, B. R. Appleton, J. Wu, and A. F. Hebard, Magnetic properties of mos2: Existence of fer- romagnetism, Applied Physics Letters101(2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [81]

    G.-Y . Zhao, H. Deng, N. Tyree, M. Guy, A. Lisfi, Q. Peng, J.- A. Yan, C. Wang, and Y . Lan, Recent progress on irradiation- induced defect engineering of two-dimensional 2h-mos2 few layers, Applied Sciences9, 678 (2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.