pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.08792 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · nucl-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Gamma-ray Signatures of r-Process Radioactivity from the Collapse of Magnetized White Dwarfs

Tetyana Pitik , Yong-Zhong Qian , David Radice , Daniel Kasen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE nucl-th
keywords gamma-ray linesr-processaccretion-induced collapsewhite dwarfsMeV telescopesradioactive decayejecta compositioniron-peak elements
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accretion-induced collapse of magnetized white dwarfs produces both r-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines, unlike neutron star mergers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models gamma-ray line emission from r-process nuclei in the ejecta of accretion-induced collapse of magnetized, rapidly rotating white dwarfs. Simulations of the collapse followed by radiation-hydrodynamics evolution with a nuclear network show that lines from iodine-132 and related isotopes dominate early emission, with cobalt-56 from iron-peak decay taking over later. The simultaneous detection of these two classes of lines would mark AIC events and would not occur in binary neutron star mergers, where iron-peak nuclei are rarely made. This signature could be observed out to tens of megaparsecs with planned MeV telescopes and remains visible even after integrating over month-long exposures.

Core claim

Using ejecta from a two-dimensional general-relativistic neutrino-magnetohydrodynamic simulation further evolved with radiation-hydrodynamics and an in-situ nuclear reaction network, the authors construct angle-dependent gamma-ray spectra. Between 1 and 10 days the emission is dominated by 132I replenished by 132Te decay, together with contributions from 131I, 133Xe and 132Te; at later times 56Co from 56Ni decay becomes primary. The simultaneous presence of r-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines is therefore distinctive of AIC ejecta and absent from binary neutron star mergers.

What carries the argument

Composition-dependent ray-tracing through the time-evolving ejecta to generate angle-dependent spectra in the 0.01-10 MeV band from the simulated composition and velocity structure.

If this is right

  • The brightest r-process lines reach the 3-sigma sensitivity of GammaTPC and GRAMS out to about 10 Mpc.
  • The r-process features remain detectable after time integration over 30-day exposures.
  • Gamma-ray observations could distinguish AIC events from binary neutron star mergers by the presence of both r-process and iron-peak lines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Detection of these lines in future events would directly constrain the fraction of galactic r-process material contributed by AIC rather than mergers.
  • The predicted line ratios could be used to test the assumed initial rotation rate and magnetic field strength of the collapsing white dwarf.
  • If the signal is seen, similar modeling could be applied to other proposed r-process sites to check for comparable iron-peak co-production.

Load-bearing premise

The two-dimensional neutrino-MHD simulation plus later radiation-hydrodynamics evolution correctly gives the ejecta composition, velocity, and r-process yields without large three-dimensional effects or nuclear-data errors changing the predicted line fluxes.

What would settle it

A nearby AIC candidate observed by a sensitive MeV telescope that shows either only r-process lines without iron-peak lines or only iron-peak lines without r-process lines would contradict the predicted simultaneous presence of both.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08792 by Daniel Kasen, David Radice, Tetyana Pitik, Yong-Zhong Qian.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Geometry of the gamma-ray escape calculation. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fractional contribution of individual radioactive iso [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Gamma-ray energy flux (Eq [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time-integrated gamma-ray fluence (Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Elemental mass fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Intrinsic gamma-ray luminosity per cell in velocity space at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We predict the gamma-ray line emission from $r$-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta of the accretion-induced collapse (AIC) of a magnetized, rapidly rotating white dwarf. Using ejecta from a two-dimensional general-relativistic neutrino-magnetohydrodynamic simulation, further evolved with a radiation-hydrodynamics code coupled to an in-situ nuclear reaction network, we construct angle-dependent gamma-ray spectra in the $0.01$-$10\,\mathrm{MeV}$ band via composition-dependent ray-tracing through the ejecta. The emission between $\sim$1 and $10\,$d is dominated by $^{132}$I ($t_{1/2} = 2.3\,$h), continuously replenished by the decay of its parent $^{132}$Te ($t_{1/2} = 3.2\,$d), with additional contributions from $^{131}$I, $^{133}$Xe, and $^{132}$Te. At $t\gtrsim 20$ d, $^{56}$Co (from $^{56}$Ni decay) becomes the primary emitter. The simultaneous presence of $r$-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines is distinctive of AIC ejecta and absent in binary neutron star mergers, where iron-peak nuclei are generally not synthesized. Comparing with the $3\sigma$ continuum sensitivities of planned MeV gamma-ray telescopes (COSI, AMEGO-X, e-ASTROGAM, GRAMS, GammaTPC), we find the brightest $r$-process lines detectable to $\sim 10\,\mathrm{Mpc}$ by GammaTPC and GRAMS, with the signal approaching their sensitivity threshold at $30\,\mathrm{Mpc}$. The $r$-process spectral features survive time integration over $\sim 30$ d exposures, demonstrating robustness against the long observation times required by gamma-ray detectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that gamma-ray line emission from r-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta of accretion-induced collapse (AIC) of magnetized, rapidly rotating white dwarfs produces a distinctive signature: simultaneous r-process lines (dominated by 132I replenished by 132Te at 1-10 days, plus 131I, 133Xe) and iron-peak lines (56Co from 56Ni at t ≳ 20 days). Using ejecta from a 2D general-relativistic neutrino-magnetohydrodynamic simulation, further evolved with radiation-hydrodynamics coupled to an in-situ nuclear network, angle-dependent spectra are constructed via composition-dependent ray-tracing in the 0.01-10 MeV band. This combination is stated to be absent in binary neutron star mergers; the brightest lines are predicted detectable to ~10 Mpc by GammaTPC/GRAMS, with features surviving ~30 d integrations.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable multi-messenger prediction for identifying AIC events through MeV gamma-ray lines, leveraging forward modeling from first-principles GRMHD codes and standard nuclear data without parameter fitting to observations. This strengthens the case for distinguishing AIC from BNS mergers via nucleosynthesis differences and offers testable targets for upcoming telescopes (COSI, AMEGO-X, e-ASTROGAM), advancing constraints on compact-object collapse channels.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (simulation and ejecta evolution)] The central claim—that simultaneous r-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines are distinctive of AIC ejecta and absent in BNS mergers—rests on the specific composition and velocity structure produced by the two-dimensional general-relativistic neutrino-magnetohydrodynamic simulation (described in the methods section following the abstract). In 3D, differences in magnetic-field amplification, neutrino-driven convection, or angular-momentum transport could shift mass fractions of key isotopes (e.g., 132Te vs. 56Ni), altering 1–10 MeV line fluxes and time evolution; the paper does not quantify this uncertainty or provide a 3D comparison, which is load-bearing for the distinctiveness assertion.
  2. [Results (gamma-ray spectra and detectability)] The detectability estimates to ~10 Mpc and the statement that r-process features survive 30 d integrations (in the results section) assume the angle-dependent ray-tracing through the 2D-derived ejecta is robust to dimensionality and nuclear-data variations. If 3D effects modify the r-process/iron-peak ratio or opacity, the comparisons to COSI, AMEGO-X, GammaTPC, and GRAMS sensitivities would require revision; a sensitivity study to these inputs is needed to support the observational claims.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and methods pipeline description are clear, but adding explicit section references (e.g., to the GRMHD run parameters or nuclear network details) would improve traceability for readers.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for spectra should note whether uncertainty bands from nuclear reaction rate variations or viewing-angle averaging are included.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address the major comments point by point below, revising the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion of limitations and caveats where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (simulation and ejecta evolution)] The central claim—that simultaneous r-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines are distinctive of AIC ejecta and absent in BNS mergers—rests on the specific composition and velocity structure produced by the two-dimensional general-relativistic neutrino-magnetohydrodynamic simulation (described in the methods section following the abstract). In 3D, differences in magnetic-field amplification, neutrino-driven convection, or angular-momentum transport could shift mass fractions of key isotopes (e.g., 132Te vs. 56Ni), altering 1–10 MeV line fluxes and time evolution; the paper does not quantify this uncertainty or provide a 3D comparison, which is load-bearing for the distinctiveness assertion.

    Authors: We agree that the results rely on 2D simulations and that 3D effects could alter detailed yields through changes in magnetic amplification or convection. The 2D GRMHD model captures the essential high-entropy, neutron-rich conditions leading to co-production of r-process and iron-peak nuclei, a feature not generally present in BNS merger models. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the methods and conclusions sections discussing this limitation, citing relevant 3D studies on related systems, and noting that future 3D AIC simulations will be required to quantify uncertainties in line fluxes. The distinctiveness claim is retained on the basis of existing BNS nucleosynthesis literature but is now qualified with the dimensionality caveat. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results (gamma-ray spectra and detectability)] The detectability estimates to ~10 Mpc and the statement that r-process features survive 30 d integrations (in the results section) assume the angle-dependent ray-tracing through the 2D-derived ejecta is robust to dimensionality and nuclear-data variations. If 3D effects modify the r-process/iron-peak ratio or opacity, the comparisons to COSI, AMEGO-X, GammaTPC, and GRAMS sensitivities would require revision; a sensitivity study to these inputs is needed to support the observational claims.

    Authors: We have performed a limited sensitivity analysis to nuclear data variations (within reported uncertainties for key decay rates) and included the results in a new appendix and revised results section; the dominant lines remain detectable to similar distances. For dimensionality, we have added explicit caveats stating that the ~10 Mpc estimate and 30 d integration robustness are based on the 2D ejecta structure and may shift if 3D effects change the r-process/iron-peak ratio or opacity. The time evolution of the brightest lines is governed by well-known decay timescales, providing qualitative robustness. We have toned down the detectability claims to reflect these uncertainties while retaining the core predictions. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A full quantitative 3D comparison or comprehensive sensitivity study to dimensionality effects, which would require new 3D GRMHD simulations beyond the scope of the current work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward modeling from independent simulations and nuclear data

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by taking ejecta from a 2D GR neutrino-MHD simulation, evolving it with radiation-hydrodynamics plus an in-situ nuclear network, and then computing angle-dependent spectra via ray-tracing. No gamma-ray observables are used to fit parameters, no self-definitional loops appear in the equations, and the claimed distinction from BNS mergers follows directly from the simulated composition (r-process plus iron-peak nuclei) without reduction to prior self-citations or ansatzes. The steps are self-contained against external nuclear data and simulation codes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the fidelity of the 2D GR neutrino-MHD simulation and the nuclear reaction network; these are standard tools but their specific setup parameters and 3D limitations are not independently validated in the provided abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The ejecta properties from the 2D GR neutrino-MHD simulation are representative of real magnetized AIC events.
    Used as input for the radiation-hydrodynamics and ray-tracing steps that generate the gamma-ray spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5652 in / 1330 out tokens · 59450 ms · 2026-05-15T13:11:10.502157+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Between∼1 and10d, 132I accounts for∼60–70% of the total gamma-ray output, sustained by secular equilib- rium with its parent132Te (t1/2 = 3.2d)

    The escaping gamma-ray luminosity from the AIC ejecta is dominated at any given time by a small number of radioactive isotopes. Between∼1 and10d, 132I accounts for∼60–70% of the total gamma-ray output, sustained by secular equilib- rium with its parent132Te (t1/2 = 3.2d). At later times (t >∼ 20d), 56Co (t1/2 = 77d) becomes the primary emitter

    work page

  2. [2]

    The gamma-ray spectra exhibit well-resolved emis- sionfeaturesfromr-process– 132I, 131I, 132Te, 133Xe, and others–that provide unambiguous signatures of neutron-rich nucleosynthesis

    work page

  3. [3]

    Atd= 10 Mpc, the brightest r-process lines remain detectable by GammaTPC and GRAMS, and are marginally above the e- ASTROGAM threshold

    Atd= 1 Mpc, the gamma-ray signal is well above the sensitivity of all instruments consid- ered (COSI, AMEGO-X, e-ASTROGAM, Gam- maTPC, GRAMS). Atd= 10 Mpc, the brightest r-process lines remain detectable by GammaTPC and GRAMS, and are marginally above the e- ASTROGAM threshold. Atd= 30 Mpc, the signal approaches the GammaTPC and GRAMS sensitiv- ity levels

    work page

  4. [4]

    4), demonstrating that the long expo- suretimesrequiredbygamma-raytelescopesdonot wash out the isotopic signatures

    Ther-process spectral features survive time in- tegration over the full0.5–30d observation win- 11 dow (Fig. 4), demonstrating that the long expo- suretimesrequiredbygamma-raytelescopesdonot wash out the isotopic signatures

    work page

  5. [5]

    The gamma-ray energy budget is dominated by io- dine (Z= 53), which contributes∼40% of the to- tal escaping gamma-ray energy despite comprising only∼5% of the ejecta mass (Fig. 5). The to- tal time-integrated escaping gamma-ray energy is Eγ,esc ∼10 47 erg

    work page

  6. [6]

    The simultaneous detection of r-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines would favour an AIC origin

    The AIC gamma-ray spectrum shares ther-process features (dominated by the132Te→ 132I chain) pre- dicted for BNS merger ejecta, but additionally con- tains 56Co lines that are absent in typical BNS dynamical ejecta. The simultaneous detection of r-process and iron-peak gamma-ray lines would favour an AIC origin. In a multi-messenger setting, the gravitatio...

    work page

  7. [7]

    S. C. Yoon, P. Podsiadlowski, and S. Rosswog, Rem- nant evolution after a carbon-oxygen white dwarf merger, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.380, 933 (2007), arXiv:0704.0297 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    K. J. Shen and L. Bildsten, The Effect of Composi- tion on Nova Ignitions, Astrophys. J.692, 324 (2009), arXiv:0805.2160 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    K. J. Shen, I. Idan, and L. Bildsten, Helium Core White Dwarfs in Cataclysmic Variables, Astrophys. J.705, 693 (2009), arXiv:0906.3767 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    The Effects of Curvature and Expansion on Helium Detonations on White Dwarf Surfaces

    K. Moore, D. M. Townsley, and L. Bildsten, The Ef- fects of Curvature and Expansion on Helium Detonations on White Dwarf Surfaces, Astrophys. J.776, 97 (2013), arXiv:1308.4193 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Nomoto, The fate of accreting white dwarfs: Type I supernovae vs

    K. Nomoto, The fate of accreting white dwarfs: Type I supernovae vs. collapse., Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics17, 249 (1986)

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    Zha, S.-C

    S. Zha, S.-C. Leung, T. Suzuki, and K. Nomoto, Evolution of ONeMg Core in Super-AGB Stars to- ward Electron-capture Supernovae: Effects of Updated Electron-capture Rate, Astrophys. J.886, 22 (2019), arXiv:1907.04184 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Nomoto and Y

    K. Nomoto and Y. Kondo, Conditions for Accretion- induced Collapse of White Dwarfs, Astrophys. J. Lett. 367, L19 (1991)

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    Fryer, W

    C. Fryer, W. Benz, M. Herant, and S. A. Colgate, What Can the Accretion-induced Collapse of White Dwarfs Re- allyExplain?,Astrophys.J.516,892(1999),arXiv:astro- ph/9812058 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Dessart, A

    L. Dessart, A. Burrows, C. D. Ott, E. Livne, S.-C. Yoon, and N. Langer, Multidimensional Simulations of the Accretion-Induced Collapse of White Dwarfs to Neu- tron Stars, Astrophys. J.644, 1063 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Magnetically-driven explosions of rapidly-rotating white dwarfs following Accretion-Induced Collapse

    L. Dessart, A. Burrows, E. Livne, and C. D. Ott, Mag- netically Driven Explosions of Rapidly Rotating White Dwarfs Following Accretion-Induced Collapse, Astro- phys. J.669, 585 (2007), arXiv:0705.3678 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    E. B. Abdikamalov, C. D. Ott, L. Rezzolla, L. Dessart, H. Dimmelmeier, A. Marek, and H. T. Janka, Axisym- metric General Relativistic Simulations of the Accretion- Induced Collapse of White Dwarfs, Phys. Rev. D81, 044012 (2010), arXiv:0910.2703 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    L. F. Longo Micchi, D. Radice, and C. Chirenti, Multi- messenger emission from the accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525, 6359 (2023), arXiv:2306.04711 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, T. Pitik, L. F. Longo Micchi, and D. Radice, Gamma-Ray Bursts and Kilonovae from the Accretion-induced Collapse of White Dwarfs, Astrophys. J.Lett.978,L38(2025),arXiv:2410.10938[astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Batziou, R

    E. Batziou, R. Glas, H. T. Janka, J. Ehring, E. Ab- dikamalov, and O. Just, Nucleosynthesis Conditions in Outflows of White Dwarfs Collapsing to Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J.984, 197 (2025), arXiv:2412.02756 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Kuroda, K

    T. Kuroda, K. Kawaguchi, and M. Shibata, Col- lapse of rotating white dwarfs and multimessenger sig- nals, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.541, 1649 (2025), 12 arXiv:2503.17082 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Combi, D.M

    L. Combi, D.M. Siegel, andB. D.Metzger, Jet-driven ex- plosion of an accretion-induced white-dwarf collapse via a magnetorotational dynamo, arXiv:2509.19799 [astro- ph.HE] (2025), arXiv:2509.19799

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Pitik, D

    T. Pitik, D. Radice, D. Kasen, F. Magistrelli, P. C.- K. Cheong, and S. Bernuzzi, Collapse of Magnetized White Dwarfs as site of Heavy Element Formation and Kilonova Signal, arXiv:2602.21291 [astro-ph.HE] (2026), arXiv:2602.21291

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Saio and K

    H. Saio and K. Nomoto, Evolution of a merging pair of C + O white dwarfs to form a single neutron star, Astron. Astrophys.150, L21 (1985)

    work page 1985

  25. [25]

    A. J. Levan, G. A. Wynn, R. Chapman, M. B. Davies, A. R. King, R. S. Priddey, and N. R. Tanvir, Short gamma-ray bursts in old populations: magnetars from white dwarf-white dwarf mergers, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.368, L1 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601332 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    E. P. J. van den Heuvel, Models for the formation of binary and millisecond radio pulsars, Journal of Astro- physics and Astronomy5, 209 (1984)

    work page 1984

  27. [27]

    P. C. C. Freire and T. M. Tauris, Direct formation of millisecond pulsars from rotationally delayed accretion- induced collapse of massive white dwarfs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.438, 86 (2014), arXiv:1311.3478 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Wang and D

    B. Wang and D. Liu, The formation of neutron star systems through accretion-induced collapse in white- dwarf binaries, Res. Astron. Astrophys.20, 135 (2020), arXiv:2005.01880 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Kremer, J

    K. Kremer, J. Fuller, A. L. Piro, and S. M. Ransom, Connecting the young pulsars in Milky Way globular clusters with white dwarf mergers and the M81 fast ra- dio burst, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.525, L22 (2023), arXiv:2305.11933 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    A. J. Levanet al., Heavy element production in a com- pact object merger observed by JWST, Nature626, 737 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    J. C. Rastinejadet al., A kilonova following a long- duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc, Nature (London) 612, 223 (2022), arXiv:2204.10864 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Radioactive decay products in neutron star merger ejecta: heating efficiency and $\gamma$-ray emission

    K. Hotokezaka, S. Wanajo, M. Tanaka, A. Bamba, Y. Terada, and T. Piran, Radioactive decay products in neutron star merger ejecta: heating efficiency andγ-ray emission, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.459, 35 (2016), arXiv:1511.05580 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Radioactive $\gamma$-Ray Emissions from Neutron Star Mergers

    L.-X. Li, Radioactive Gamma-Ray Emissions from Neu- tron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J.872, 19 (2019), arXiv:1808.09833 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Korobkinet al., Gamma-rays from kilonova: a po- tential probe of r-process nucleosynthesis, Astrophys

    O. Korobkinet al., Gamma-rays from kilonova: a po- tential probe of r-process nucleosynthesis, Astrophys. J. 889, 168 (2020), arXiv:1905.05089 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Chen, L.-X

    M.-H. Chen, L.-X. Li, D.-B. Lin, and E.-W. Liang, Gamma-Ray Emission Produced by r-process Elements fromNeutronStarMergers,Astrophys.J.919,59(2021), arXiv:2107.02982 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Impact of in situ nuclear networks and atomic opacities on neutron star merger ejecta dynamics, nucleosynthesis, and kilonovae

    F. Magistrelli, S. Bernuzzi, A. Perego, M. Jacobi, and C. J. Fontes, Impact of in-situ nuclear networks and atomic opacities on neutron star merger ejecta dynamics, nucleosynthesis, and kilonovae, arXiv:2512.11032 [astro- ph.HE] (2025), arXiv:2512.11032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Terada, Y

    Y. Terada, Y. Miwa, H. Ohsumi, S.-i. Fujimoto, S. Kat- suda, A. Bamba, and R. Yamazaki, Gamma-ray Diag- nostics of r-process Nucleosynthesis in the Remnants of Galactic Binary Neutron-Star Mergers, Astrophys. J. 933, 111 (2022), arXiv:2205.05407 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Gross, S

    A. Gross, S. Cupp, and M. R. Mumpower, Multimes- sengers from the Radioactive Decay of r-process Nuclei, Astrophys. J. Lett.995, L28 (2025), arXiv:2509.00267 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    J. A. Tomsicket al., The Compton Spectrometer and Imager, PoSICRC2023, 745 (2023), arXiv:2308.12362 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Caputoet al., All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory eXplorer mission concept, J

    R. Caputoet al., All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory eXplorer mission concept, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst.8, 044003 (2022), arXiv:2208.04990 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Science with e-ASTROGAM (A space mission for MeV-GeV gamma-ray astrophysics)

    M. Tavaniet al.(e-ASTROGAM), Science with e- ASTROGAM: A space mission for MeV–GeV gamma- ray astrophysics, JHEAp19, 1 (2018), arXiv:1711.01265 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Shuttet al., The GammaTPC Gamma-Ray Tele- scope Concept, arXiv:2502.14841 [astro-ph.IM] (2025), arXiv:2502.14841

    T. Shuttet al., The GammaTPC Gamma-Ray Tele- scope Concept, arXiv:2502.14841 [astro-ph.IM] (2025), arXiv:2502.14841

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    J. Zenget al.(GRAMS), Gamma-Ray and AntiMat- ter Survey (GRAMS) experiment, in19th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics(2025) arXiv:2512.14913 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, L.-M. Lin, and T. G. F. Li, Gmunu: toward multigrid based Einstein field equa- tions solver for general-relativistic hydrodynamics sim- ulations, Classical and Quantum Gravity37, 145015 (2020), arXiv:2001.05723 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Li, Gmunu: paralleled, grid-adaptive, general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in curvilinear geometries in dy- namical space-times, Mon

    P.C.-K.Cheong, A.T.-L.Lam, H.H.-Y.Ng,andT.G.F. Li, Gmunu: paralleled, grid-adaptive, general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in curvilinear geometries in dy- namical space-times, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508, 2279 (2021), arXiv:2012.07322 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    J. M. Lattimer and F. D. Swesty, A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter, Nuclear Physics A535, 331 (1991)

    work page 1991

  47. [47]

    Morozova, A

    V. Morozova, A. L. Piro, M. Renzo, C. D. Ott, D. Clausen, S. M. Couch, J. Ellis, and L. F. Roberts, Light Curves of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Substan- tial Mass Loss Using the New Open-Source SuperNova Explosion Code (SNEC), Astrophys. J.814, 63 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Z. Wu, G. Ricigliano, R. Kashyap, A. Perego, and D. Radice, Radiation hydrodynamics modelling of kilo- novae with SNEC, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.512, 328 (2022), arXiv:2111.06870 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    SkyNet: A modular nuclear reaction network library

    J. Lippuner and L. F. Roberts, SkyNet: A modular nu- clear reaction network library, Astrophys. J. Suppl.233, 18 (2017), arXiv:1706.06198 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    R. H. Cyburtet al., The JINA REACLIB Database: Its Recent Updates and Impact on Type-I X-Ray Bursts, Astrophys. J. Suppl.189, 240 (2010), arXiv:1005.3131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    Möller, A

    P. Möller, A. J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, and H. Sagawa, Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012), At. Data Nucl. Data Tables109-110, 1 (2016)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    D. A. Brown, M. B. Chadwick, R. Capote, A. C. Kahler, A. Trkov, M. W. Herman, A. A. Sonzogni, Y. Danon, A. D. Carlson, M. Dunn, D. L. Smith, G. M. Hale, G. Arbanas, R. Arcilla, C. R. Bates, B. Beck, B. Becker, F. Brown, R. J. Casperson, J. Conlin, D. E. Cullen, M.-A. Descalle, R. Firestone, T. Gaines, K. H. Guber, A. I. Hawari, J. Holmes, T. D. Johnson, T...

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    J. H. Hubbell, W. J. Veigele, E. A. Briggs, R. T. Brown, D. T. Cromer, and R. J. Howerton, Atomic form fac- tors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scat- tering cross sections, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data4, 471 (1975)

    work page 1975

  54. [54]

    Jacobi, F

    M. Jacobi, F. Magistrelli, E. Loffredo, G. Ricigliano, L. Chiesa, S. Bernuzzi, A. Perego, and A. Ar- cones, 56Ni production in long-lived binary neutron star merger remnants, arXiv:2503.17445 [astro-ph.HE] (2025), arXiv:2503.17445

    work page arXiv 2025