pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09381 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-10 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

An accelerated direct solver for scalar wave scattering by multiple transmissive inclusions in two dimensions

Yasuhiro Matsumoto
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords wave scatteringboundary integral equationsdirect solverHelmholtz transmissionmultiple inclusionslow-rank approximationproxy methodPMCHWT formulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A proxy-based direct solver for wave scattering by many inclusions compresses the linear system to size O(ω D) with O(N^{1.5}) cost on grids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents a fast direct solver for scalar wave scattering by multiple transmissive inclusions in two dimensions that relies on boundary integral equations for the Helmholtz transmission problem. It applies low-rank approximations through the proxy method to handle interactions between separate inclusions efficiently, with a key speedup coming from skipping interior integral terms in the PMCHWT formulation. The approach reduces the size of the compressed algebraic system to O(ω D) where ω is the frequency and D is the bounding box diameter. For inclusions arranged on a grid at fixed frequency the total computational cost scales as O(N^{1.5}), and the PMCHWT version runs roughly six times faster while halving the compressed system size relative to the Burton-Miller version.

Core claim

The solver applies boundary integral equations to Helmholtz transmission problems with many disjoint inclusions and uses the proxy method for low-rank approximations of inter-scatterer interactions that omit internal terms in the PMCHWT case. This compresses the linear algebraic system to size O(ω D) and yields total cost at most O(N^{1.5}) when inclusions lie on a grid at fixed frequency. The PMCHWT formulation is approximately six times faster than Burton-Miller when each inclusion is treated as a cell and produces a system half as large in the same setting.

What carries the argument

Low-rank approximation via the proxy method for interactions between disjoint scatterers, omitting internal integral representation terms in the PMCHWT formulation.

If this is right

  • The linear system compresses to size O(ω D).
  • Total computational cost scales as O(N^{1.5}) for fixed frequency when inclusions form a grid.
  • PMCHWT runs approximately six times faster than Burton-Miller when each inclusion is treated as a cell.
  • PMCHWT halves the compressed system size compared with Burton-Miller in the same grid setting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could allow direct solution of scattering problems with thousands of inclusions where iterative solvers become impractical.
  • Omitting interior terms might be adapted to other second-kind integral formulations for similar efficiency gains.
  • Irregular or clustered inclusion layouts may still benefit from the direct approach even if the O(N^{1.5}) scaling softens.
  • Extending the same proxy compression to three dimensions would test whether the O(ω D) size reduction persists.

Load-bearing premise

The proxy method delivers accurate low-rank approximations of interactions between separate inclusions without using internal integral terms, an advantage that works for PMCHWT but fails for Burton-Miller.

What would settle it

A test on a grid of inclusions at fixed frequency that measures whether the compressed matrix size grows beyond linear in ω D or the runtime exceeds O(N^{1.5}) scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09381 by Yasuhiro Matsumoto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multiple star-shaped scatterers. This figure corresponds to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of the absolute value of the numerical solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the numerical solution on the boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the numerical solution on the boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relative 2-norm error defined in (27). Plots are sorted in descending order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Computational time of the fast direct solver based on PMCHWT (Omit) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Computational time at threshold ϵ = 10−12. The labels “PMCHWT (Omit)”, “PMCHWT (All)” and “BM” correspond to the fast direct solver based on (10), (9) and (11), respectively. In the labels, ϵ represents the threshold of the column-pivoted QR decomposition in the fast direct solver. The labels “PMCHWT (Conventional)”, “BM (Conventional)” correspond to (10) and (11), respectively, and are solved by a standar… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Degrees of freedom of original system versus compressed system with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Degrees of freedom of compressed system with respect to increasing the fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Relative 2-norm error for various frequencies for a fixed degrees of freedom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Computational time for various frequencies for a fixed degrees of freedom 25600. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper discusses a fast direct solver using boundary integral equations for Helmholtz transmission problems involving multiple inclusions in two dimensions. Efficiently addressing scattering problems in the presence of numerous inclusions remains a key challenge for various practical applications. For problems involving a large number of scatterers, the number of iterations in Krylov subspace methods is known to increase significantly. This occurs even when using second-kind boundary integral equations, which are typically recognized for their rapid convergence. We consider a fast direct solver as an alternative, an approach that has been less commonly explored for transmission problems with disjoint multiple inclusions. The low-rank approximation based on the proxy method achieve speedup by calculating interactions between disjoint scatterers without the terms derived from the internal integral representation. Notably, this advantage applies to the Poggio--Miller--Chang--Harrington--Wu--Tsai (PMCHWT) formulation but breaks down in the Burton--Miller case. Numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed solver can compress the system of linear algebraic equations to a size of $O(\omega D)$, where $\omega$ is the frequency of the incident wave and $D$ is the diameter of the (smallest) bounding box enclosing the multiple inclusions. The total computational cost scales as $O(N^{1.5})$ $(= O(\sqrt{N}^3))$ at most for a fixed $\omega$ when the inclusions are arranged on a grid. Moreover, the PMCHWT formulation, that omits the interior term in the proxy method, is approximately six times faster than the Burton--Miller formulation when treating each inclusion as a cell. Furthermore, in the same setting, the former can compress the size of the system of linear algebraic equations by half compared to the latter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fast direct solver for 2D Helmholtz transmission scattering by multiple disjoint inclusions. It uses standard boundary-integral formulations (PMCHWT and Burton-Miller) together with a proxy-based low-rank compression of inter-scatterer interactions. The key technical observation is that, for the PMCHWT formulation, the interior integral-representation terms can be omitted from the proxy without destroying the low-rank structure, yielding a compressed system of size O(ωD) and total cost O(N^{1.5}) for grid arrangements at fixed frequency; numerical timings show the PMCHWT version is roughly six times faster and produces a matrix half the size of the Burton-Miller version.

Significance. If the reported scaling and accuracy are rigorously verified, the work supplies a practical direct solver for a class of transmission problems that are otherwise expensive for iterative methods. The explicit comparison of the two formulations and the observation that interior-term omission is admissible only for PMCHWT are useful contributions to the literature on fast BIE solvers for multiple scatterers.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / proxy-method section] Abstract and the section describing the proxy compression: the claim that omitting the interior integral-representation terms from the proxy still produces a numerically low-rank interaction matrix of size O(ωD) while preserving solution accuracy is asserted but not supported by any error analysis, rank bound, or consistency proof. Because the PMCHWT operator couples interior and exterior fields, dropping the interior proxy contribution is an approximation whose validity depends on separation distance, contrast, and frequency; without a quantitative bound this step is load-bearing for both the O(ωD) compression claim and the reported 6× speedup.
  2. [Numerical examples] Numerical-examples section: the O(N^{1.5}) scaling and O(ωD) compressed size are supported only by timing plots and matrix-size counts; no convergence tables, residual histories, or error bars versus a reference solution are supplied, nor is there explicit verification that the post-processing steps (e.g., local corrections) preserve the claimed complexity and accuracy.
  3. [Numerical examples / formulation comparison] Comparison of PMCHWT versus Burton-Miller: the factor-of-six speedup and factor-of-two compression advantage are reported for the grid-arrangement test, yet the manuscript does not quantify how the omitted interior proxy terms affect solution accuracy across the range of contrasts and frequencies used in the experiments.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the proxy radius and tolerance should be introduced once and used consistently; the abstract refers to “proxy rank / tolerance” without defining the symbols.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the timing and compression plots should state the precise definition of N (total degrees of freedom) and whether the reported times include factorization or only compression.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / proxy-method section] Abstract and the section describing the proxy compression: the claim that omitting the interior integral-representation terms from the proxy still produces a numerically low-rank interaction matrix of size O(ωD) while preserving solution accuracy is asserted but not supported by any error analysis, rank bound, or consistency proof. Because the PMCHWT operator couples interior and exterior fields, dropping the interior proxy contribution is an approximation whose validity depends on separation distance, contrast, and frequency; without a quantitative bound this step is load-bearing for both the O(ωD) compression claim and the reported 6× speedup.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit discussion of the approximation. The omission is admissible for PMCHWT because the interior representation is already accounted for in the local block and the proxy only needs to capture the exterior radiating field; this is not true for Burton-Miller. While we do not supply a rigorous rank bound, the numerical evidence in the grid-arrangement experiments shows that the numerical rank remains O(ωD) with negligible effect on accuracy for the tested separations and contrasts. In the revision we will add a short subsection with a heuristic argument based on the Green's function decay and additional rank plots versus separation distance. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical examples] Numerical-examples section: the O(N^{1.5}) scaling and O(ωD) compressed size are supported only by timing plots and matrix-size counts; no convergence tables, residual histories, or error bars versus a reference solution are supplied, nor is there explicit verification that the post-processing steps (e.g., local corrections) preserve the claimed complexity and accuracy.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the current numerical section relies primarily on timing and size data. We will add convergence tables comparing the solver output against a reference solution obtained by direct dense assembly on smaller instances, together with residual histories and error bars. We will also include a brief complexity verification for the local-correction post-processing step to confirm it does not alter the overall O(N^{1.5}) scaling. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Numerical examples / formulation comparison] Comparison of PMCHWT versus Burton-Miller: the factor-of-six speedup and factor-of-two compression advantage are reported for the grid-arrangement test, yet the manuscript does not quantify how the omitted interior proxy terms affect solution accuracy across the range of contrasts and frequencies used in the experiments.

    Authors: We will extend the numerical comparison section with additional runs that vary the contrast ratio and frequency while reporting both timing/compression metrics and solution accuracy (relative L2 error on the boundary) for both formulations. This will explicitly quantify the accuracy impact of the interior-term omission in the PMCHWT proxy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: scalings emerge from numerical experiments on standard BIE + proxy compression

full rationale

The derivation relies on established PMCHWT and Burton-Miller boundary-integral operators together with the proxy low-rank technique for inter-scatterer interactions. The O(ω D) compressed size and O(N^{1.5}) cost for grid arrangements are reported as observed outcomes of the algorithm applied to concrete examples, not as quantities fitted or predicted from the same data by construction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or renaming of a known result; the distinction between formulations follows directly from the differing integral operators. The method is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach relies on the standard well-posedness of the Helmholtz transmission problem for smooth disjoint inclusions and on the empirical accuracy of the proxy-point low-rank approximation for far-field interactions; no new physical constants or entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • proxy rank / tolerance
    The number or accuracy threshold of proxy points used to build the low-rank blocks is chosen to meet a target error; its value is not reported in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The inclusions are disjoint and sufficiently separated for the proxy method to produce accurate low-rank far-field interactions without interior terms.
    Invoked when the authors state that the speedup applies to interactions between disjoint scatterers.
  • domain assumption The PMCHWT formulation remains stable and the Burton-Miller formulation does not admit the same interior-term omission.
    Stated directly in the comparison of the two formulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5610 in / 1595 out tokens · 51679 ms · 2026-05-15T13:35:10.127198+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00005410

    Bebendorf, M., Approximation of boundary element ma- trices, Numerische Mathematik, Vol.86 (2000), pp.565–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00005410

    work page doi:10.1007/pl00005410 2000

  2. [2]

    and Miller, G.F., The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Burton, A.J. and Miller, G.F., The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathe- matical and Physical Sciences, Vol.323, No.1553 (1971) pp.201–210. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1971.0097

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1971.0097 1971

  3. [3]

    and Martinsson, P

    Bremer, J., Gillman, A. and Martinsson, P. G., A high-order ac- curate accelerated direct solver for acoustic scattering from sur- faces, BIT Numerical Mathematics, Vol.55, No.2 (2015), pp.367–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-014-0508-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10543-014-0508-y 2015

  4. [4]

    https://doi.org/10.1137/040603917

    Carpentieri, B., Duff, I.S., Giraud, L., Sylvand, G., Combining fast multipoletechniquesandanapproximateinversepreconditionerforlarge electromagnetism calculations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol.27, No.3 (2005), pp.774–792. https://doi.org/10.1137/040603917

    work page doi:10.1137/040603917 2005

  5. [5]

    IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation Vol.25, No.6 (1977), pp.789–795

    Chang, Y., Harrington, R., A surface formulation for char- acteristic modes of material bodies. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation Vol.25, No.6 (1977), pp.789–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1977.1141685

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.1977.1141685 1977

  6. [6]

    Cheng, H., Gimbutas, Z., Martinsson, P. G. and Rokhlin, V., On the compression of low rank matrices, SIAM Jour- nal on Scientific Computing, Vol.26, No.4 (2005), pp.1389–1404. https://doi.org/10.1137/030602678

    work page doi:10.1137/030602678 2005

  7. [7]

    Cho, M. H. and Barnett, A. H. Robust fast direct integral equa- tion solver for quasi-periodic scattering problems with a large num- ber of layers, Optics express, Vol.23, No.2 (2015), pp.1775–1799. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.001775

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.23.001775 2015

  8. [8]

    and Wegener, M., Mechanical metamaterials, Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol.86, No.9 (2023), p.094501

    Craster, R., Guenneau, S., Kadic, M. and Wegener, M., Mechanical metamaterials, Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol.86, No.9 (2023), p.094501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ace069 26

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ace069 2023

  9. [9]

    and Klöckner, A., A Fast Direct Solver for Boundary Integral Equations Using Quadrature By Expansion, Journal of Scientific Com- puting, Vol.106, No.2 (2026), p.45

    Fikl, A. and Klöckner, A., A Fast Direct Solver for Boundary Integral Equations Using Quadrature By Expansion, Journal of Scientific Com- puting, Vol.106, No.2 (2026), p.45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-025- 03174-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10915-025- 2026

  10. [10]

    and Barnett, A., A fast direct solver for quasi-periodic scattering problems, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.248 (2013), pp.309–322

    Gillman, A. and Barnett, A., A fast direct solver for quasi-periodic scattering problems, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.248 (2013), pp.309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.015 2013

  11. [11]

    Gimbutas, Z. and Greengard, L., Fast multi-particle scattering: A hybrid solver for the Maxwell equations in microstructured materi- als, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.232, No.1 (2013), pp.22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.041 2013

  12. [12]

    Gopal, A., and Martinsson, P. G., An accelerated, high-order accurate direct solver for the Lippmann–Schwinger equation for acoustic scatter- ing in the plane, Advances in Computational Mathematics, Vol.48, No.4 (2022), p.42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-022-09963-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10444-022-09963-1 2022

  13. [13]

    Greengard, L., Gueyffier, D., Martinsson, P. G. and Rokhlin, V., Fast direct solvers for integral equations in complex three- dimensional domains, Acta Numerica, Vol.18 (2009), pp.243–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492906410011

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492906410011 2009

  14. [14]

    Greengard, L., Ho, K. L. and Lee, J. Y., A fast direct solver for scat- tering from periodic structures with multiple material interfaces in two dimensions. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.258 (2014), pp.738–

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.11.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.11.011 2013

  16. [16]

    https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1232814

    Lai, J., and Li, P., A framework for simulation of multiple elastic scatter- ing in two dimensions, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol.41, No.5 (2019), pp.A3276–A3299. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1232814

    work page doi:10.1137/18m1232814 2019

  17. [17]

    C., Bennetts, L

    Hawkins, S. C., Bennetts, L. G., Nethercote, M. A., Peter, M. A., Peterseim, D., Putley, H. J. and Verfürth, B., Metamate- rial applications of TMATSOLVER, an easy-to-use software for simulating multiple wave scattering in two dimensions. Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A, Vol.480, No.2292 (2024), p.20230934. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2023.0934 27

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0934 2024

  18. [18]

    https://doi.org/10.1515/jnum-2012-0013

    Hecht, F., New development in FreeFem++, Journal of nu- merical mathematics, Vol.20, No.3-4 (2012), pp.251-266. https://doi.org/10.1515/jnum-2012-0013

    work page doi:10.1515/jnum-2012-0013 2012

  19. [19]

    Neutrino Production via $e^-e^+$ Collision at $Z$-boson Peak

    Ma, Q., Deshmukh, S. and Yokota, R., Scalable linear time dense direct solver for 3-D problems without trailing sub-matrix dependen- cies. SC22: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Dallas, TX, USA (2022), pp.1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/SC41404.2022.00088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1109/sc41404.2022.00088 2022

  20. [20]

    Martinsson, P. G. and Rokhlin, V., A fast direct solver for boundary integral equations in two dimensions, Jour- nal of Computational Physics, Vol.205, No.1 (2005), pp.1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.033 2005

  21. [21]

    Martinsson, P. G. and Rokhlin, V., A fast direct solver for scattering problems involving elongated structures, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.221, No.1 (2007), pp.288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.037 2007

  22. [22]

    G., Fast direct solvers for elliptic PDEs, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA (2019)

    Martinsson, P. G., Fast direct solvers for elliptic PDEs, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976045

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9781611976045 2019

  23. [23]

    Matsumoto, Y., A Helmholtz multiple scattering analysis using fast di- rect solver in two dimensions, 2025 M&M/CMD Symposium for Young Researchers, August 27–29 (2025), Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Matsumoto, Y. and Maruyama, T., Linearly scalable fast direct solver based on proxy surface method for two-dimensional elastic wave scatter- ing by cavity, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, Vol.173 (2025a), p.106148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106148

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106148 2025

  25. [25]

    and Maruyama, T., A fast direct solver for two- dimensional transmission problems of elastic waves

    Matsumoto, Y. and Maruyama, T., A fast direct solver for two- dimensional transmission problems of elastic waves. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19986 (2025b). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.19986 (Accepted by Engineering with Computers)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19986

  26. [26]

    and Matsushima, K., Efficient LU factoriza- tion exploiting direct-indirect Burton–Miller equation for Helmholtz 28 transmission problems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14193 (2025)

    Matsumoto, Y. and Matsushima, K., Efficient LU factoriza- tion exploiting direct-indirect Burton–Miller equation for Helmholtz 28 transmission problems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14193 (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.14193

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.14193 2025

  27. [27]

    and Yamada, T., Omnidirectional acoustic cloaking against airborne sound realized by a locally reso- nant sonic material, Scientific Reports, Vol.12, No.1 (2022), p.16383

    Matsushima, K., Noguchi, Y. and Yamada, T., Omnidirectional acoustic cloaking against airborne sound realized by a locally reso- nant sonic material, Scientific Reports, Vol.12, No.1 (2022), p.16383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20591-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20591-z 2022

  28. [28]

    C., Acoustic and electromagnetic equations: integral repre- sentations for harmonic problems (Vol

    Nédélec, J. C., Acoustic and electromagnetic equations: integral repre- sentations for harmonic problems (Vol. 144), Springer New York (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4393-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4393-7 2001

  29. [29]

    J., Averitt, R

    Padilla, W. J., Averitt, R. D. Imaging with metamaterials, Nature Re- views Physics, Vol.4 (2022), pp.85–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254- 021-00394-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254- 2022

  30. [30]

    In: Mittra, R

    Poggio, A.J., Miller, E.K., Chapter 4 - Integral equation solutions of three-dimensional scattering problems. In: Mittra, R. (ed.) Com- puter Techniques for Electromagnetics, International Series of Mono- graphsinElectricalEngineering(1973), pp.159–264.Pergamon, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-016888-3.50008-8

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-016888-3.50008-8 1973

  31. [31]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(90)90107-C

    Rokhlin, V., Rapid solution of integral equations of scattering theory in two dimensions, Journal of Computational physics, Vol.86, No.2 (1990), pp.414–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(90)90107-C

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(90)90107-c 1990

  32. [32]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0871-6

    Sagan, H., Space-filling curves, Springer New York, NY (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0871-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0871-6 2012

  33. [33]

    P., Kivshar, Y

    Shi, Y., Song, Q., Toftul, I., Zhu, T., Yu, Y., Zhu, W., Tsai, D. P., Kivshar, Y. and Liu, A. Q., Optical manipulation with metamate- rial structures, Applied Physics Reviews, Vol.9, No.3 (2022), p.031303. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0091280

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0091280 2022

  34. [34]

    Smith, M. J. and Abrahams, I. D., Tailored acoustic metamaterials. Part I. Thin-and thick-walled Helmholtz resonator arrays, Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A, Vol.478, No.2262 (2022), p.20220124. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2022.0124 29

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2022.0124 2022

  35. [35]

    Spendlhofer, T., Ma, Q., Matsumoto, Y. and Yokota, R., On the In- terplay Between Precision, Rank and Admissibility for Iterative Hierar- chical Low-Rank Matrix Solvers, ISC High Performance 2025 Research Paper Proceedings (40th International Conference), Hamburg, Germany (2025), pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23919/ISC.2025.11017731

    work page doi:10.23919/isc.2025.11017731 2025

  36. [36]

    and Martinsson, P

    Wu, B. and Martinsson, P. G., Zeta correction: a new approach to con- structing corrected trapezoidal quadrature rules for singular integral op- erators, Advances in Computational Mathematics, Vol.47, No.3 (2021), p.45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-021-09872-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10444-021-09872-9 2021

  37. [37]

    and Martinsson, P

    Wu, B. and Martinsson, P. G., A unified trapezoidal quadrature method for singular and hypersingular boundary integral operators on curved surfaces, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol.61, No.5 (2023), pp.2182–2208. https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1520372

    work page doi:10.1137/22m1520372 2023

  38. [38]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-020- 00818-z 30

    Zhang, YandGillman, A., Afastdirectsolverfortwodimensionalquasi- periodic multilayered media scattering problems, BIT Numerical Mathe- matics, Vol.61 (2021), pp.141–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-020- 00818-z 30

    work page doi:10.1007/s10543-020- 2021