pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.11259 · v2 · pith:CC7FQ3B2new · submitted 2026-03-11 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat

Comprehensive Mass Predictions: From Triply Heavy Baryons to Pentaquarks

S. Rostami , A. R. Olamaei , M. Malekhosseini , K. Azizi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-lat
keywords fully heavy baryonspentaquarksmass spectramachine learningGürsey-Radicati formulaexotic hadronsradial excitationsPDG data
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning models and an extended mass formula both predict the masses of fully heavy baryons and pentaquarks from their quantum numbers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that two separate techniques can generate mass values for triply heavy baryons and a wide set of pentaquark states. One technique trains deep neural networks and a Particle Transformer directly on the quantum numbers and measured masses of known hadrons from the PDG database. The second technique modifies the Gürsey-Radicati formula to account for charm and bottom quarks and then computes masses analytically for both ground and radially excited levels. The two sets of results line up with each other and with existing experimental measurements, while supplying concrete numbers for many states that have not yet been seen. A reader would care because these numbers supply specific targets that experiments can search for in the coming years.

Core claim

The authors establish that deep neural networks and the Particle Transformer architecture, trained on PDG hadron data, produce mass predictions for fully heavy baryons and exotic pentaquarks, while an extension of the Gürsey-Radicati formula to charm and bottom quarks supplies matching analytical results for ground and radially excited states. Both routes agree with available experimental values and generate forecasts for unobserved states.

What carries the argument

Dual framework of neural-network models trained on quantum numbers together with the charm- and bottom-extended Gürsey-Radicati mass formula.

If this is right

  • Mass values are supplied for numerous unobserved triply heavy baryons.
  • Mass estimates are given for many exotic pentaquark states beyond the known Pc candidates.
  • Forecasts are produced for higher radial excitations of both baryons and pentaquarks.
  • The predictions supply concrete targets that can guide searches at current and future collider experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the machine-learning route succeeds here, the same training strategy could be tested on other exotic families such as tetraquarks.
  • The numerical agreement between the two methods hints at regularities in hadron masses that might be examined in effective QCD descriptions.
  • Confirmation of even a few predicted masses would test whether the extrapolation from light to heavy quark systems is valid.

Load-bearing premise

That patterns learned from the existing PDG hadron masses can be extrapolated reliably to systems made entirely of charm and bottom quarks, and that the Gürsey-Radicati formula can be extended to these quarks without large uncontrolled errors.

What would settle it

A high-precision experimental mass measurement for one of the predicted states, such as the ground-state triply charmed baryon, that lies outside the uncertainty bands reported by both the machine-learning and formula calculations.

read the original abstract

In this article, we use two different methods for studying the mass spectra of fully-heavy baryons and pentaquarks. In the first section, we use state-of-the-art machine learning methods, such as deep neural networks and the Particle Transformer model architecture, to predict baryon masses directly from their quantum numbers, based on experimental information on hadrons from the Particle Data Group (PDG). We use this data-driven approach for the case of fully heavy baryons, and a large number of exotic pentaquark states, going much beyond the well-known $ P_c^+(4380) $ and $ P_c^+(4457) $ candidates. Subsequently,we extend the G\"ursey-Radicati mass formula to incorporate the contributions of charm and bottom quarks, enabling analytical calculations for both ground and radially excited states of baryons and pentaquarks. The results obtained from both approaches demonstrate strong agreement with experimental data where available and make predictions for a number of unobserved states, including higher radial excitations. By addressing the question through both data-driven prediction and analytical modeling in different frameworks, this study offers complementary insights into the mass spectrum of conventional and exotic hadrons, guiding future experimental searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to predict masses of fully heavy baryons (including triply heavy) and exotic pentaquarks using two complementary methods: (i) machine learning models (deep neural networks and Particle Transformer) trained directly on PDG experimental hadron masses from quantum numbers, and (ii) an analytical extension of the Gürsey-Radicati mass formula that incorporates charm and bottom quark contributions. It reports strong agreement with available data and provides predictions for unobserved states, including higher radial excitations.

Significance. If the extrapolations prove reliable, the dual data-driven and analytical approach could supply mass estimates useful for guiding searches at LHCb and other facilities. The explicit use of two independent frameworks is a methodological strength that allows cross-checks, though the paper does not demonstrate that either method has been validated on out-of-distribution heavy-quark systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / ML description] Abstract and machine-learning section: the claim of 'strong agreement with experimental data where available' is not supported by any reported validation protocol, cross-validation splits, or uncertainty quantification for models trained on PDG data (predominantly light hadrons). With <<10 fully-heavy baryons in the training set and no established pentaquarks, generalization to Ωccc, bbb, and 5-quark states is an uncontrolled extrapolation whose reliability cannot be assessed from the given information.
  2. [Gürsey-Radicati extension] Gürsey-Radicati extension section: the incorporation of charm and bottom contributions is presented as enabling analytical calculations, yet the manuscript supplies no derivation or fitting procedure for the new mass-shift parameters. Because these parameters are necessarily determined from the same limited heavy-hadron data used for the ML training, any reported agreement between the two methods risks circularity rather than independent confirmation.
  3. [Pentaquark results] Pentaquark predictions: the extension to exotic 5-quark configurations (beyond the known Pc candidates) is performed with the same unvalidated models and formula; no test is shown that the input quantum numbers alone suffice to capture the heavy-quark dynamics or binding effects required for reliable mass estimates.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains a missing space: 'Subsequently,we'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of validation and methodological transparency that we address below. We indicate where revisions will strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / ML description] Abstract and machine-learning section: the claim of 'strong agreement with experimental data where available' is not supported by any reported validation protocol, cross-validation splits, or uncertainty quantification for models trained on PDG data (predominantly light hadrons). With <<10 fully-heavy baryons in the training set and no established pentaquarks, generalization to Ωccc, bbb, and 5-quark states is an uncontrolled extrapolation whose reliability cannot be assessed from the given information.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit reporting of the validation protocol. The DNN and Particle Transformer models were trained with standard k-fold cross-validation on the PDG dataset (including held-out heavy-hadron subsets) and ensemble-based uncertainty estimates; these metrics appear in supplementary material but were not detailed in the main text. We will add a dedicated validation subsection with cross-validation results, performance on heavy-quark subsets, and uncertainty bands to support the agreement claims. The limited number of fully heavy states is inherent to current data and is now explicitly discussed as a limitation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Gürsey-Radicati extension] Gürsey-Radicati extension section: the incorporation of charm and bottom contributions is presented as enabling analytical calculations, yet the manuscript supplies no derivation or fitting procedure for the new mass-shift parameters. Because these parameters are necessarily determined from the same limited heavy-hadron data used for the ML training, any reported agreement between the two methods risks circularity rather than independent confirmation.

    Authors: The extended formula adds charm- and bottom-specific shift terms whose values were obtained by fitting to known heavy-hadron masses. We will include the full algebraic derivation of the extended Gürsey-Radicati expression together with the fitting procedure and covariance matrix in a new appendix. While both approaches draw on the same experimental masses, the ML method is non-parametric and the formula is symmetry-based; we will clarify this distinction and note that agreement between them is presented as cross-check rather than fully independent validation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Pentaquark results] Pentaquark predictions: the extension to exotic 5-quark configurations (beyond the known Pc candidates) is performed with the same unvalidated models and formula; no test is shown that the input quantum numbers alone suffice to capture the heavy-quark dynamics or binding effects required for reliable mass estimates.

    Authors: The models were applied to the established Pc(4380) and Pc(4457) candidates and reproduce their masses within uncertainties. Quantum numbers are the sole inputs because they encode spin, flavor, and parity information that the training data associate with mass. We acknowledge that binding dynamics in exotics may not be fully captured and will add an explicit limitations paragraph plus comparisons with other theoretical pentaquark mass calculations in the revised text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

ML outputs and extended Gürsey-Radicati formula reduce to fits on PDG data by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "we use state-of-the-art machine learning methods, such as deep neural networks and the Particle Transformer model architecture, to predict baryon masses directly from their quantum numbers, based on experimental information on hadrons from the Particle Data Group (PDG). We use this data-driven approach for the case of fully heavy baryons, and a large number of exotic pentaquark states"

    The model is trained/fitted on PDG hadron masses; outputs for unobserved fully-heavy and pentaquark states are therefore interpolations or extrapolations from the fitted training set rather than independent predictions.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Subsequently,we extend the Gürsey-Radicati mass formula to incorporate the contributions of charm and bottom quarks, enabling analytical calculations for both ground and radially excited states of baryons and pentaquarks."

    Extending the formula requires new mass-shift parameters for c/b quarks that are fitted to existing hadron masses; the resulting 'analytical' mass values for new states therefore depend on the same input data by construction.

full rationale

The paper trains ML models directly on PDG experimental masses to 'predict' masses for fully-heavy baryons and pentaquarks from quantum numbers, and extends the Gürsey-Radicati formula by adding charm/bottom terms whose coefficients are adjusted to known masses. Both methods therefore produce outputs that are statistical or parametric extrapolations from the same input data set rather than independent derivations. This matches the 'fitted_input_called_prediction' pattern for the central claims about unobserved states, yielding partial circularity (score 6) without self-citation chains or self-definitional equations. The derivation chain is not self-contained against external benchmarks for the new states.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the generalization ability of ML models trained on PDG data and on the validity of the Gürsey-Radicati extension to heavy quarks; both rely on parameters that are almost certainly fitted to existing measurements.

free parameters (1)
  • charm and bottom contributions in extended Gürsey-Radicati formula
    The extension to incorporate charm and bottom quarks requires additional terms whose numerical values are not derived from first principles and are therefore fitted to data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Machine learning models trained on known PDG hadron masses can accurately predict masses for fully heavy baryons and exotic pentaquarks
    Invoked for the data-driven section of the work.
  • domain assumption The Gürsey-Radicati mass formula remains valid when extended to include charm and bottom quark contributions
    Central premise of the analytical calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5763 in / 1467 out tokens · 86214 ms · 2026-05-25T06:36:28.598178+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and relativistic quark model [70] results. B. Fully heavy baryons: validation of the ML framework The fully heavy baryon sector provides a particularly suitable testing ground for assessing the reliability of the ML approaches employed in this work. The masses of triply heavy baryons are largely governed by heavy-quark dynamics and are therefore relativel...

    work page arXiv 1943

  2. [2]

    On the structure of atomic nuclei,

    W. Heisenberg, “On the structure of atomic nuclei,” Z. Phys.77(1932), 1-11,

    work page 1932

  3. [3]

    A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,

    M. Gell-Mann, “A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,” Phys. Lett.8(1964), 214-215,

    work page 1964

  4. [4]

    Symmetries of baryons and mesons,

    M. Gell-Mann, “Symmetries of baryons and mesons,” Phys. Rev.125(1962), 1067-1084,

    work page 1962

  5. [5]

    An Introduction to quantum field theory,

    M. E. Peskin and D. V . Schroeder, “An Introduction to quantum field theory,” Addison-Wesley (1995), ISBN 978-0-201-50397-5, doi:10.1201/9780429503559

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

  6. [6]

    A New Extended Model of Hadrons,

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn and V . F. Weisskopf, “A New Extended Model of Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D9(1974), 3471-3495,

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    On the Interaction of Elementary Particles I,

    H. Yukawa, “On the Interaction of Elementary Particles I,” Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jap.17(1935), 48-57,

    work page 1935

  8. [8]

    Baryon spectroscopy

    E. Klempt and J. M. Richard, “Baryon spectroscopy,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010), 1095-1153, [arXiv:0901.2055 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Mass and structure of the nucleon: Gluon trace anomaly versus spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    M. Schumacher, “Mass and structure of the nucleon: Gluon trace anomaly versus spontaneous symmetry breaking,” [arXiv:1807.10798 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Observation of five new narrow $\Omega_c^0$ states decaying to $\Xi_c^+ K^-$

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of five new narrowΩ 0 c states decaying toΞ + c K −,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) no.18, 182001, [arXiv:1703.04639 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Observation of an excited $\Omega^-$ baryon

    J. Yeltonet al.[Belle], “Observation of an ExcitedΩ − Baryon,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) no.5, 052003, [arXiv:1805.09384 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Observation of a new baryon state in theΛ 0 bπ+π− mass spectrum,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of a new baryon state in theΛ 0 bπ+π− mass spectrum,” JHEP06(2020), 136, [arXiv:2002.05112 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Observation of the decayΛ + c →Σ −π+π+π0,

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII], “Observation of the decayΛ + c →Σ −π+π+π0,” Phys. Lett. B772(2017), 388-393, [arXiv:1705.11109 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Observation of a New Excited Beauty Strange Baryon Decaying toΞ − b π+π−,

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.[CMS], “Observation of a New Excited Beauty Strange Baryon Decaying toΞ − b π+π−,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no.25, 252003, [arXiv:2102.04524 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Observation of the Charmed BaryonΛ(c) ine +e− Annihilation at 10-GeV,

    H. Albrechtet al.[ARGUS], “Observation of the Charmed BaryonΛ(c) ine +e− Annihilation at 10-GeV,” Phys. Lett. B207(1988), 109-114,

    work page 1988

  16. [16]

    An Observation of exclusive Lambda(c)+ decays into Sigma+ and mesons.,

    S. Barlaget al.[ACCMOR], “An Observation of exclusive Lambda(c)+ decays into Sigma+ and mesons.,” Phys. Lett. B283(1992), 465-470,

    work page 1992

  17. [17]

    New decay modes of the Lambda(c)+ charm baryon,

    R. Ammaret al.[CLEO], “New decay modes of the Lambda(c)+ charm baryon,” Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995), 3534-3537,

    work page 1995

  18. [18]

    Observation of $\Lambda^+_{c}\to nK^0_S\pi^+$

    M. Ablikimet al.[BESIII], “Observation ofΛ + c →nK 0 Sπ+,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) no.11, 112001, [arXiv:1611.02797 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Observation of the doubly strange b baryon Omega_b-

    V . M. Abazovet al.[D0], “Observation of the doubly strangebbaryonΩ − b ,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008), 232002, [arXiv:0808.4142 [hep-ex]]. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Measurement of the \Lambda_b^0, \Xi_b^- and \Omega_b^- baryon masses

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Measurement of theΛ 0 b,Ξ − b andΩ − b baryon masses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) no.18, 182001, [arXiv:1302.1072 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Study of excitedΛ 0 b states decaying toΛ 0 bπ+π− in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV ,

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.[CMS], “Study of excitedΛ 0 b states decaying toΛ 0 bπ+π− in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV ,” Phys. Lett. B803(2020), 135345, [arXiv:2001.06533 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Altmannshofer et al

    E. Kouet al.[Belle-II], “The Belle II Physics Book,” PTEP2019(2019) no.12, 123C01, [arXiv:1808.10567 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Observation of the Xi_b^0 Baryon

    T. Aaltonenet al.[CDF], “Observation of theΞ 0 b Baryon,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011), 102001, [arXiv:1107.4015 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    First Observation of Heavy Baryons \Sigma_b and \Sigma_b^*

    T. Aaltonenet al.[CDF], “First observation of heavy baryonsΣ b andΣ ∗ b,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007), 202001, [arXiv:0706.3868 [hep- ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    Observation of charge–parity symmetry breaking in baryon decays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of charge–parity symmetry breaking in baryon decays,” Nature643(2025) no.8074, 1223-1228, [arXiv:2503.16954 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Measurement of CP asymmetries inΛ 0 b →ph- decays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Measurement of CP asymmetries inΛ 0 b →ph- decays,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.9, 092004, [arXiv:2412.13958 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Establishing CP Violation in b-Baryon Decays,

    J. J. Han, J. X. Yu, Y . Li, H. n. Li, J. P. Wang, Z. J. Xiao and F. S. Yu, “Establishing CP Violation in b-Baryon Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134(2025) no.22, 221801, [arXiv:2409.02821 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Heavy baryons

    J. G. Korner, M. Kramer and D. Pirjol, “Heavy baryons,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.33(1994), 787-868, [arXiv:hep-ph/9406359 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  29. [29]

    Spectroscopy of Hadrons Containing One Heavy Quark,

    D. Izatt, C. E. Detar and M. Stephenson, “Spectroscopy of Hadrons Containing One Heavy Quark,” Nucl. Phys. B199(1982), 269-289,

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    Nonperturbative Potential Model for Light and Heavy Quark anti-Quark Systems,

    D. P. Stanley and D. Robson, “Nonperturbative Potential Model for Light and Heavy Quark anti-Quark Systems,” Phys. Rev. D21(1980), 3180-3196,

    work page 1980

  31. [31]

    Observation of $J/\psi p$ resonances consistent with pentaquark states in ${\Lambda_b^0\to J/\psi K^-p}$ decays

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consistent with Pentaquark States inΛ 0 b →J/ψK −pDecays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), 072001, [arXiv:1507.03414 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, $P_c(4312)^+$, and of two-peak structure of the $P_c(4450)^+$

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,P c(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of theP c(4450)+,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) no.22, 222001, [arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Observation of aJ/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate inB − →J/ψΛ ¯pDecays,

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], “Observation of aJ/ψΛResonance Consistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate inB − →J/ψΛ ¯pDecays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) no.3, 031901, [arXiv:2210.10346 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    An updated review of the new hadron states,

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “An updated review of the new hadron states,” Rept. Prog. Phys.86(2023) no.2, 026201, [arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Multiquark Resonances

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A. D. Polosa, “Multiquark Resonances,” Phys. Rept.668(2017), 1-97, [arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo and C. Z. Yuan, “TheXY Zstates: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives,” Phys. Rept.873(2020), 1-154, [arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Non-Standard Heavy Mesons and Baryons, an Experimental Review

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki and D. Zieminska, “Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90 (2018) no.1, 015003, [arXiv:1708.04012 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Quark models of baryon masses and decays,

    S. Capstick and W. Roberts, “Quark models of baryon masses and decays,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.45(2000), S241-S331, [arXiv:nucl- th/0008028 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv 2000

  39. [39]

    Positive Parity Excited Baryons in a Quark Model with Hyperfine Interactions,

    N. Isgur and G. Karl, “Positive Parity Excited Baryons in a Quark Model with Hyperfine Interactions,” Phys. Rev. D19(1979), 2653,

    work page 1979

  40. [40]

    Tetraquarks and Pentaquarks from Quark Model Perspective,

    H. Huang, C. Deng, X. Liu, Y . Tan and J. Ping, “Tetraquarks and Pentaquarks from Quark Model Perspective,” Symmetry15(2023) no.7, 1298,

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Excited state baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD

    R. G. Edwards, J. J. Dudek, D. G. Richards and S. J. Wallace, “Excited state baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D84 (2011), 074508, [arXiv:1104.5152 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    Charmed bottom baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD

    Z. S. Brown, W. Detmold, S. Meinel and K. Orginos, “Charmed bottom baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) no.9, 094507, [arXiv:1409.0497 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    QCD and resonance physics: Theoretical foundations,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V . I. Zakharov, “QCD and resonance physics: Theoretical foundations,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 385-447 (1979)

    work page 1979

  44. [44]

    QCD and rresonance physics: Applications,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V . I. Zakharov, “QCD and rresonance physics: Applications,” Nucl. Phys. B147, 448-518 (1979)

    work page 1979

  45. [45]

    Radiative Decays of the Heavy Flavored Baryons in Light Cone QCD Sum Rules

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and A. Ozpineci, “Radiative decays of the heavy flavored baryons in Light cone QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D79, 056005 (2009), [arXiv:0901.0076 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Analysis of the $\Lambda_{b}\rar \Lambda \ell^+\ell^- $ decay in QCD

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, “Analysis of theΛ b →Λℓ +ℓ− decay in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D81, 056006 (2010), [arXiv:1001.0227 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Doubly heavy spin--1/2 baryon spectrum in QCD

    T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi and M. Savci, “Doubly heavy spin–1/2 baryon spectrum in QCD,” Nucl. Phys. A895, 59-70 (2012), [arXiv:1205.2873 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  48. [48]

    Mass and decay constant of the newly observed exotic $X(5568)$ state

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, “Mass and decay constant of the newly observed exoticX(5568)state,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.7, 074024 (2016), [arXiv:1602.08642 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Strong vertices of doubly heavy spin-3/2 baryons with light pseudoscalar mesons,

    A. R. Olamaei, K. Azizi and S. Rostami, “Strong vertices of doubly heavy spin-3/2 baryons with light pseudoscalar mesons,” Chin. Phys. C45, no.11, 113107 (2021), [arXiv:2102.03852 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Investigation of full-charm and full-bottom pentaquark states,

    K. Azizi, Y . Sarac and H. Sundu, “Investigation of full-charm and full-bottom pentaquark states,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.7, 695, [arXiv:2402.19440 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Properties of thePc(4312)pentaquark and its bottom partner,

    K. Azizi, Y . Sarac and H. Sundu, “Properties of thePc(4312)pentaquark and its bottom partner,” Chin. Phys. C45(2021) no.5, 053103, [arXiv:2011.05828 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Possible Molecular Pentaquark States with Different Spin and Quark Configurations

    K. Azizi, Y . Sarac and H. Sundu, “Possible Molecular Pentaquark States with Different Spin and Quark Configurations,” Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) no.5, 054002, [arXiv:1805.06734 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Electromagnetic properties of ¯D(∗)Ξ′ c, ¯D(∗)Λc, ¯D(∗) s Λc and ¯D(∗) s Ξc pentaquarks,

    U. ¨Ozdem, “Electromagnetic properties of ¯D(∗)Ξ′ c, ¯D(∗)Λc, ¯D(∗) s Λc and ¯D(∗) s Ξc pentaquarks,” Phys. Lett. B846(2023), 138267, [arXiv:2303.10649 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Review of Particle Properties. Particle Data Group,

    M. Aguilar-Benitezet al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Properties. Particle Data Group,” Phys. Lett. B170(1986), 1-350,

    work page 1986

  55. [55]

    Review of particle physics,

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.3, 030001, 24

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Machine learning and the physical sciences,

    G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. V ogt-Maranto and L. Zdeborov´a, “Machine learning and the physical sciences,” Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) no.4, 045002, [arXiv:1903.10563 [physics.comp-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B716(2012), 1-29, [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    A Deep Neural Network for Simultaneous Estimation of b Jet Energy and Resolution,

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.[CMS], “A Deep Neural Network for Simultaneous Estimation of b Jet Energy and Resolution,” Comput. Softw. Big Sci.4(2020) no.1, 10, [arXiv:1912.06046 [physics.data-an]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Baryons from Mesons: A Machine Learning Perspective,

    Y . Gal, V . Jejjala, D. K. Mayorga Pe˜na and C. Mishra, “Baryons from Mesons: A Machine Learning Perspective,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37(2022) no.06, 2250031, [arXiv:2003.10445 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Meson mass and width: Deep learning approach,

    M. Malekhosseini, S. Rostami, A. R. Olamaei, R. Ostovar and K. Azizi, “Meson mass and width: Deep learning approach,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.5, 054011, [arXiv:2404.00448 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    CGAN-Based Framework for Meson Mass and Width Prediction,

    S. Rostami, M. Malekhosseini, M. R. Ezabadi and K. Azizi, “CGAN-Based Framework for Meson Mass and Width Prediction,” [arXiv:2501.18562 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Exploring fully-heavy tetraquarks through the CGAN framework: Mass and width,

    M. Malekhosseini, S. Rostami, A. R. Olamaei and K. Azizi, “Exploring fully-heavy tetraquarks through the CGAN framework: Mass and width,” Nucl. Phys. B1018(2025), 116977, [arXiv:2503.00993 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Particle Transformer for Jet Tagging,

    H. Qu, C. Li and S. Qian, “Particle Transformer for Jet Tagging,” [arXiv:2202.03772 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Spin and Unitary Spin Independence of Strong Interactions,

    F. G ¨ursey and L. A. Radicati, “Spin and Unitary Spin Independence of Strong Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964), 173–175,

    work page 1964

  65. [65]

    Searching for Exotic Particles in High-Energy Physics with Deep Learning

    P. Baldi, P. Sadowski and D. Whiteson, “Searching for Exotic Particles in High-Energy Physics with Deep Learning,” Nature Commun. 5(2014), 4308, [arXiv:1402.4735 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Deep Learning and its Application to LHC Physics

    D. Guest, K. Cranmer and D. Whiteson, “Deep Learning and its Application to LHC Physics,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68(2018), 161-181, [arXiv:1806.11484 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics,

    A. Radovic, M. Williams, D. Rousseau, M. Kagan, D. Bonacorsi, A. Himmel, A. Aurisano, K. Terao and T. Wongjirad, “Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics,” Nature560(2018) no.7716, 41-48,

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Phenomenological predictions for pentaquark masses from fits to baryon masses,

    P. Holma and T. Ohlsson, “Phenomenological predictions for pentaquark masses from fits to baryon masses,” Phys. Lett. B800(2020), 135108, [arXiv:1906.08499 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Evidence for Narrow S=+1 Baryon Resonance in Photo-production from Neutron

    T. Nakanoet al.[LEPS], “Evidence for a narrow S = +1 baryon resonance in photoproduction from the neutron,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91 (2003), 012002, [arXiv:hep-ex/0301020 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  70. [70]

    Investigation of triply heavy spin-3/2 baryons in their ground and excited states,

    Z. R. Najjar and K. Azizi, “Investigation of triply heavy spin-3/2 baryons in their ground and excited states,” Phys. Lett. B871(2025), 140000, [arXiv:2504.06822 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Triply heavy baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model,

    R. N. Faustov and V . O. Galkin, “Triply heavy baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.1, 014013, [arXiv:2111.07702 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Possible interpretations of theP c(4312),P c(4440), andP c(4457),

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen and S. L. Zhu, “Possible interpretations of theP c(4312),P c(4440), andP c(4457),” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no.5, 051501, [arXiv:1903.11001 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Hidden-Bottom Pentaquarks

    G. Yang, J. Ping and J. Segovia, “Hidden-bottom pentaquarks,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.1, 014035, [arXiv:1809.06193 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Hidden-bottom pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic moments and partial widths,

    A. Sharma and A. Upadhyay, “Hidden-bottom pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic moments and partial widths,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139(2024) no.9, 860, [arXiv:2402.14885 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Molecular-typeQQss¯spentaquarks predicted by an extended hidden gauge symmetry approach,

    Z. Y . Wang, C. W. Xiao, Z. F. Sun and X. Liu, “Molecular-typeQQss¯spentaquarks predicted by an extended hidden gauge symmetry approach,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.3, 034038, [arXiv:2311.17736 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Doubly-charm and doubly-bottom pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang and Z. G. Wang, “Doubly-charm and doubly-bottom pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) no.17n18, 2450067, [arXiv:2405.00281 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Surveying exotic pentaquarks with the typical $QQqq\bar{q}$ configuration

    Q. S. Zhou, K. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Surveying exotic pentaquarks with the typicalQQqq¯qconfiguration,” Phys. Rev. C98(2018) no.4, 045204, [arXiv:1801.04557 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Prediction ofQQqq¯smolecular pentaquarks within the extended local hidden gauge approach,

    Z. Y . Wang and Z. W. Long, “Prediction ofQQqq¯smolecular pentaquarks within the extended local hidden gauge approach,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.5, 056029, [arXiv:2508.21474 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    The study of doubly charmed pentaquarkcc¯qqqwith the SU(3) symmetry,

    Y . Xing and Y . Niu, “The study of doubly charmed pentaquarkcc¯qqqwith the SU(3) symmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) no.11, 978, [arXiv:2106.09939 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Unified spectroscopic study of bottom mesons and doubly bottom baryons using a relativistic flux-tube model,

    P. Jakhad and A. K. Rai, “Unified spectroscopic study of bottom mesons and doubly bottom baryons using a relativistic flux-tube model,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.7, 074011, [arXiv:2509.14699 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.