Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 28 references

Frequency Comb Behavior of Time Crystals in an RF-Driven Dissipative Rydberg System

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Strongly interacting cesium atoms in a vapor can be driven into a dissipative time-crystal phase whose RF-controlled self-oscillations generate a frequency comb with 2.5 kHz spacing.

desk verdict Real observation, overclaimed interpretation: the 2.5 kHz comb is the intermodulation grid of the 10 kHz beatnote and 7.5 kHz intrinsic oscillation, and the paper doesn't show the time-crystal label adds anything. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12170 v1 pith:HUPJT6JA submitted 2026-03-12 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Dixith Manchaiah , William J. Watterson , Christopher L. Holloway This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords timecrystalRydbergvaporfrequencycombdriven-dissipativesystemself-sustainedoscillationsRFheterodynemean-fieldmodelVanderPoloscillator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a hot gas of cesium atoms, excited into strongly interacting Rydberg states, behaves as a single self-sustained nonlinear oscillator — a dissipative time crystal — and that this oscillator can be controlled with radio-frequency fields. When two RF tones are applied, the atomic response exhibits intermodulation, frequency pulling, and injection locking. At sufficiently strong drive, the atomic coherence develops a comb-like spectrum: a series of equally spaced, phase-locked lines with a measured spacing of 2.496 kHz around a 10 kHz beatnote. The authors reproduce these observations with a four-level mean-field model in which Rydberg-Rydberg interactions act as a global population-dependent level shift, and they show a driven Van der Pol oscillator gives the same comb phenomenology. This matters because it connects the physics of time crystals to the classic toolbox of nonlinear oscillators and frequency combs, and it points toward a tunable, vapor-cell platform for low-frequency electric-field sensing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the mean-field interaction shift V_MF = V_norm <rho_ii>^beta, which evolves with a finite response time tau_MF. Because it depends on the velocity-averaged Rydberg population, it couples all atomic velocity classes through a shared feedback field, turning a Doppler-broadened ensemble into a coherent, self-sustained oscillator. The RF heterodyne field enters through the beat amplitude E_RF = sqrt(E_LO^2 + E_SIG^2 + 2E_LO E_SIG cos(Domega t + phi)), which acts as a parametric modulation of the oscillator's effective detuning and generates the comb via nonlinear mixing. The classical analogue is the driven Van der Pol oscillator, whose parametric drive produces sideb

What would settle it

Measure the Rydberg-level shift directly (e.g., via dc Stark or EIT line-position changes) while the system is oscillating, and compare its population and time dependence with V_norm<rho>^beta and tau_MF. If the shift does not follow the assumed power law, or if the comb spacing deviates from the beatnote over a broad parameter range, the parametric-modulation/mean-field interpretation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under strong two-photon excitation of a cesium Rydberg vapor, Rydberg-Rydberg interactions produce a population-dependent shift of the Rydberg level (V_MF = V_norm <rho_ii>^beta) that feeds back on the optical detuning and destabilizes the steady state, driving the ensemble into self-sustained limit-cycle oscillations — the dissipative time-crystal phase. An applied RF field Stark-shifts the levels and continuously tunes the intrinsic oscillation frequency, pulling it to lower values with increasing power. Under heterodyne conditions (a signal tone plus a local-oscillator tone), the atomic coherence behaves as a nonlinear mixer: intermodulation products appear at |n f_osc +/- f_bn|, the osci

Load-bearing premise

The explanation rests on the assumption that Rydberg-Rydberg interactions act as a single global, population-dependent level shift with a finite response time; if real interactions don't reduce to that mean field, the model's agreement is a fit, not a derivation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The intrinsic oscillation frequency of the time-crystal phase can be continuously tuned by adjusting RF power and detuning, giving a voltage-controlled oscillator at the atomic level.
  • Heterodyne driving turns the atomic ensemble into a phase-locked nonlinear mixer: intermodulation products appear at |n f_osc +/- f_bn|, and injection locking occurs when the beatnote is near the intrinsic frequency.
  • At strong RF signal power the atomic coherence develops a comb of equally spaced lines (spacing 2.496 kHz) centered on the 10 kHz beatnote, with residuals near zero, indicating deterministic, phase-coherent spectral lines.
  • The same comb behavior is reproduced by a four-level mean-field model and by a driven Van der Pol oscillator, showing that parametric modulation of a self-sustained oscillator explains the observations.
  • The setup provides a tunable vapor-cell platform for low-frequency RF electric-field sensing and frequency stabilization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because comb spacing tracks the beatnote (an integer multiple of the intrinsic oscillation frequency), the comb could serve as a self-referenced frequency ruler for low-frequency RF fields; a natural next experiment is to scan the beatnote and confirm Delta f follows it exactly.
  • The model's free parameters V_norm, beta, and tau_MF are not independently measured; a direct measurement of the interaction shift's density and time dependence would test whether the global-feedback mechanism is correct or merely a fitting device.
  • If the global mean-field feedback is essential, reducing Doppler broadening should change the synchronization and comb formation; this is a testable prediction of the paper's mechanism.
  • The Van der Pol analogy suggests that stronger drive may push the system into period-doubling or chaotic regimes, extending the observed behavior beyond the comb and further validating the nonlinear-oscillator picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experiments on a cesium Rydberg vapor under two-photon EIT with an applied RF field. It first characterizes a regime of self-sustained oscillations, interpreted as a driven-dissipative time crystal, and shows that RF Stark modulation tunes the oscillation frequency. In a heterodyne configuration (LO and signal RF tones separated by 10 kHz) the authors observe injection locking, intermodulation products described by Eq. (1), and, at high signal power, a comb-like spectrum with tooth spacing near 2.5 kHz (Fig. 4). A four-level optical Bloch equation model with a phenomenological mean-field interaction shift, Eqs. (7)-(8), and a driven van der Pol oscillator, Eq. (23), are presented as theoretical support.

Significance. The raw spectral data provide a clean observation of equally spaced spectral structure; the linear fit in Fig. 4b with small residuals is a useful experimental result. If the comb could be shown to be a property of the collective Rydberg time-crystal oscillation rather than generic intermodulation among the applied and self-generated tones, this would be a significant contribution to both Rydberg nonlinear optics and time-crystal research. As written, that discrimination is missing, and the supporting models contain free parameters or are circular on the key spacing. The paper is therefore of contingent significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (1), Fig. 4] The central claim of comb behavior is currently underdetermined. The reader reports f_bn = 10 kHz and intrinsic f_osc ≈ 7.5 kHz in the same scan (Sec. 3.4, Fig. 3c). Substituting those values into the paper's own mixing law, f_IF = |n f_osc ± f_bn|, gives 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, ... kHz, i.e., exactly the observed 2.5 kHz grid. Thus the comb could be high-order intermodulation of two commensurate tones present already in the drive, with no time-crystal-specific mechanism. The sentence 'This comb structure occurs when f_bn is an integer multiple of f_osc' is also contradicted by the numbers (10 kHz is not an integer multiple of 7.5 kHz; both are integer multiples of 2.5 kHz). To make the claim load-bearing the authors should either measure a regime where the comb spacing is not the gcd of f_bn and f_osc, or provide a phase-coherence/amplitude analysis that separates the time-crystal re
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (7)-(8), Table 1] The theoretical support is parameterized per panel and contains an ill-posed equation. V_norm, β and τ_MF are free, and Table 1 shows different parameter sets for each panel; the Discussion admits the model is 'highly dependent on the model parameters' and reproduces data only 'qualitatively.' This contradicts the abstract's 'quantitatively capture.' Eq. (8) as written, ˙V = τ^{-1}[V(t+Δt)-V(t)], is also dimensionally inconsistent unless Δt is absorbed or defined. The model therefore cannot independently establish the time-crystal interpretation or the comb mechanism; at most it shows that some nonlinear feedback can produce similar spectra.
  3. [Sec. 4, Eq. (23), Fig. 7] The van der Pol analogue sets ω_d = 2.5 kHz, exactly the measured comb spacing. This assumes the result to be explained. If the analogue is to support the claim, ω_d should be determined from the experimental drive frequencies (e.g., from f_bn = 10 kHz and f_osc = 7.5 kHz) or varied independently; otherwise it demonstrates only that a parametric drive at the comb spacing produces a comb. The comparison with experiment is therefore circular at the key frequency.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (13)-(22)] Several Bloch equations appear to contain typos; for example, Eq. (19) for ρ31 has ρ32 on the right-hand side, while other equations have similar index slips. Please proofread the full set.
  2. [Table 1] The table formatting is garbled: the β row is missing separators, and the Vnorm column is labeled GHz although the numerical values look like they may be scaled differently. This should be cleaned up.
  3. [Fig. 4b] The residuals are described as small, but no uncertainty estimates are provided for the extracted peak positions. Without error bars or a quantitative residual metric, the 'small deviations' claim is not fully supported.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The spectrum in Fig. 2c is said to be averaged over five repeated measurements, but no averaging procedure or error treatment is given; this is worth stating for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The measured comb spectrum is independent, but the Van der Pol and mean-field 'explanations' insert the target comb spacing and per-panel fitted interaction parameters as inputs and then recover them.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4 (Discussion), Eq. (23) and Fig. 7]
    "Using experimental values, we set ω0 = 10 kHz, ω d = 2.5 kHz, and ϵ = 0.3. ... This produces a comb-like spectrum, as shown in Fig. 7(b), with peak spacing set by ω d/2π."

    The target observation is the measured comb spacing Δf = 2.496 kHz (Fig. 4b). The Van der Pol simulation takes ωd/2π = 2.5 kHz as an input, equal to that measured spacing, and then reports that the output comb spacing is ωd/2π. The spacing is therefore not derived from the oscillator dynamics; it is inserted by hand and recovered identically. As an explanation of why the comb spacing is 2.5 kHz, this reduces to the input by construction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4 (Discussion), Eq. (7), Table 1, Fig. 6]
    "Our numerical simulations using the mean-field optical Bloch equations for a ladder system qualitatively reproduce many of the observed experimental dynamics (Fig. 6), and in particular support the Rydberg-Rydberg mean-field interaction term given by equation 7. ... In total, the mean-field model can reproduce many of the observed effects, but is highly dependent on the model parameters. Further work is needed to experimentally identify Vnorm and β..."

    Eq. (7) contains free parameters Vnorm, β, and Eq. (8) adds τMF; Table 1 changes Vnorm (−20, −16, −20 GHz) and β (1.8, 1.5, 2, 1.8) for each simulation panel, with the comb case (e–f) using ΔωRF = 2.5. Because the model is tuned per panel to exhibit the target behavior, the agreement is a fit rather than an independent test. The paper even concedes the parameters are not experimentally identified, so invoking the simulation as 'support' for Eq. (7) is circular: the term is assumed, fitted, and then credited with producing the assumed behavior.

full rationale

The empirical comb spectrum in Fig. 4 is an independent observation and is not itself circular: the extracted Δf = 2.496 kHz is a real feature, and Eq. (1) rationally relates the intermodulation grid to the 7.5 kHz self-oscillation and 10 kHz beatnote. The circularity lies in the theoretical-support sections. The Van der Pol analogue sets the modulation frequency to the measured tooth spacing (ωd = 2.5 kHz) and then reports the same value as the output spacing—an input recovered identically. The four-level mean-field model similarly uses Eq. (7)–(8) with Vnorm, β, and τMF chosen separately for each simulation panel, so the agreement is parameter fitting rather than prediction; the paper's own admission that 'further work is needed to experimentally identify Vnorm and β' confirms the parameters are not independently fixed. There is no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness-theorem issue. Because the central empirical claim stands but the modeled explanation is substantially fitted to the target behavior, a partial-circularity score of 6 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological interaction model with several free parameters (V_norm, β, τ_MF, per-panel Rabi/detuning values). The data alone support the comb pattern, but the model's predictive content is currently limited because it is tuned to reproduce the observed behavior.

free parameters (5)
  • V_norm (mean-field interaction strength) = -16 to -20 GHz (per panel)
    Sets the amplitude and timescale of the interaction-induced feedback; chosen ad hoc in Table 1, not measured independently.
  • β (interaction exponent) = 1.5-2.3
    Controls the nonlinear dependence of the interaction shift on Rydberg population; chosen per panel to match waveform shape.
  • τ_MF (mean-field response time) = not specified
    Introduced in Eq. 8; any finite response time changes the dynamics, yet no value or independent measurement is given.
  • Simulation parameters (Ωp, Ωc, ΩLO, ΩSIG, Δp, Δc, ΔωRF) = Table 1 values
    Chosen separately for each panel of Fig. 6; no fitting procedure, uncertainty, or sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • Van der Pol parameters (ω_d, ε) = ω_d = 2.5 kHz, ε = 0.3
    Chosen to illustrate comb formation with the observed 2.5 kHz spacing, not derived from the experiment's beatnote or oscillator parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Lindblad master equation (Eqs. 11-12) accurately describes the four-level atomic dynamics.
    Standard open-quantum-system framework, but applied to a hot vapor with Doppler classes and collective interactions without microscopic justification.
  • ad hoc to paper Rydberg-Rydberg interactions can be represented by a global, population-dependent mean-field shift V_MF = V_norm ⟨ρ_ii⟩^β (Eq. 7).
    This is the core feedback mechanism; it is postulated, with free parameters, and the authors state that identifying V_norm and β requires further work.
  • domain assumption All atomic velocity classes share the same mean-field feedback and partially synchronize through it (Eq. 8 and §4).
    Needed to explain coherent macroscopic oscillations despite Doppler dephasing; no independent evidence that a single global shift couples all classes.
  • standard math The RF heterodyne envelope can be approximated by Eq. 10 with the low-frequency beat term.
    A standard description of two-tone RF mixing, consistent with cited mixer literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The driven Van der Pol oscillator (Eq. 23) is a valid classical analogue for the comb mechanism.
    Illustrative parallel; the chosen drive frequency equals the observed comb spacing rather than emerging from a mapping of atomic parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Frequency Comb Behavior of Time Crystals in an RF-Driven Dissipative Rydberg System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HUPJT6JA

@misc{pith2026260312170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Frequency Comb Behavior of Time Crystals in an RF-Driven Dissipative Rydberg System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HUPJT6JA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12170}
}
read the original abstract

Driven nonlinear oscillators constitute a universal paradigm for understanding synchronization, frequency pulling, and frequency comb formation in nonequilibrium systems. Here, we realize such an emergent nonlinear oscillator in strongly interacting cesium Rydberg vapor, where coherent optical excitation, dissipation, and long-range interactions give rise to a driven-dissipative time crystal phase with intrinsic oscillation frequencies. Applying a radio-frequency (RF) field allows controlled tuning of the intrinsic oscillation frequency. Under RF heterodyne conditions, we observe intermodulation, frequency pulling, and, at strong drive, the emergence of a comb-like spectrum in the atomic coherence. We quantitatively capture these observations using a four-level mean-field model and demonstrate a classical analogue with a driven Van der Pol oscillator. Our results establish interacting Rydberg ensembles as a tunable platform for exploring nonequilibrium time-crystalline order, nonlinear synchronization, and frequency comb generation in many-body atomic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12170 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Energy-level diagram of the four-level cesium system driven by optical and RF fields. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Probe transmission as a function of the coupling detuning for different coupling Rabi frequen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Two dimensional color map of the RF power as a function of frequency, showing the evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Frequency comb-like structure in the heterodyne spectrum for a LO RF power of 0 dBm and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Velocity-resolved Rydberg state popula￾tion as a function of time for Vnorm = 400, β = 2.3, Ωp/Γ21 = 6 MHz, and Ωc/Γ21 = 5 MHz. shows the time evolution of the velocity-resolved Ry￾dberg population ρrr(t, vj ) for different atomic ve￾locity classes, together with the e…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Numerical simulations from 4-level mean-field master equation model reproduce experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Time-domain evolution x(t) of a para￾metrically driven Van der Pol oscillator. (b) Fourier transform of the time-domain signal, showing the re￾sulting frequency-domain comb structure. products are clearly seen at ∼ 0.03Γ21 and ∼ 0.18Γ21. Finally, as observed in Fig…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Quantum Time Crystals.Phys

    Frank Wilczek. Quantum Time Crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:160401, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Classical time crystals.Phys

    Alfred Shapere and Frank Wilczek. Classical time crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:160402, Oct 2012

    2012

  3. [3]

    Time crystals: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(1):016401, nov 2017

    Krzysztof Sacha and Jakub Zakrzewski. Time crystals: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(1):016401, nov 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Yao, Eugene Demler, and Mikhail D

    Soonwon Choi, Joonhee Choi, Renate Landig, Georg Kucsko, Hengyun Zhou, Junichi Isoya, Fe- dor Jelezko, Shinobu Onoda, Hitoshi Sumiya, Vedika Khemani, Curt von Keyserlingk, Nor- man Y. Yao, Eugene Demler, and Mikhail D. Lukin. Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system. nat, 543(7644):221–225, March 2017

    2017

  5. [5]

    Zhang et al

    J. Zhang et al. Observation of a discrete time crystal.Nature, 543:217–220, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Lukin, and Dmitry A

    Wen Wei Ho, Soonwon Choi, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Dmitry A. Abanin. Critical Time Crys- tals in Dipolar Systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(1):010602, 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Self-oscillating pump in a topo- logical dissipative atom–cavity system.Nature, 608(7923):494–498, 2022

    Davide Dreon, Alexander Baumg¨ artner, Xian- gliang Li, Simon Hertlein, Tilman Esslinger, and Tobias Donner. Self-oscillating pump in a topo- logical dissipative atom–cavity system.Nature, 608(7923):494–498, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    12 Cosme, and Andreas Hemmerich

    Hans Keßler, Phatthamon Kongkhambut, Christoph Georges, Ludwig Mathey, Jayson G. 12 Cosme, and Andreas Hemmerich. Observation of a Dissipative Time Crystal.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(4):043602, 2021

    2021

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Yao, Mikhail D

    Bihui Zhu, Jamir Marino, Norman Y. Yao, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Eugene A. Demler. Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems.New J. Phys., 21:073028, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    Stuart Adams

    Karen Wadenpfuhl and C. Stuart Adams. Emergence of Synchronization in a Driven- Dissipative Hot Rydberg Vapor.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(14):143002, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Complexity, dynamics, control, and applica- tions of nonlinear systems with multistability

    Viet-Thanh Pham, Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan, and Tomasz Kapitaniak. Complexity, dynamics, control, and applica- tions of nonlinear systems with multistability. Complexity, 2020(1):8510930, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Strogatz

    Steven H. Strogatz. From kuramoto to craw- ford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 143(1):1–20, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    Acebr´ on, L

    Juan A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, Conrad J. P´ erez Vicente, F´ elix Ritort, and Renato Spigler. The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena.Rev. Mod. Phys., 77:137–185, Apr 2005

    2005

  6. [14]

    ˇSibali´ c, C

    N. ˇSibali´ c, C. G. Wade, C. S. Adams, K. J. Weatherill, and T. Pohl. Driven-dissipative many-body systems with mixed power-law in- teractions: Bistabilities and temperature-driven nonequilibrium phase transitions.Phys. Rev. A, 94:011401, Jul 2016

    2016

  7. [15]

    A. W. Glaetzle, R. Nath, B. Zhao, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller. Driven-dissipative dynamics of a strongly interacting Rydberg gas.Phys. Rev. A, 86:043403, 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Dissi- pative time crystal in a strongly interacting Ry- dberg gas.Nature Phys., 20(9):1389–1394, 2024

    Xiaoling Wu, Zhuqing Wang, Fan Yang, Ruochen Gao, Chao Liang, Meng Khoon Tey, Xiangliang Li, Thomas Pohl, and Li You. Dissi- pative time crystal in a strongly interacting Ry- dberg gas.Nature Phys., 20(9):1389–1394, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    C. Carr, R. Ritter, C. G. Wade, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill. Nonequilibrium phase transition in a dilute rydberg ensemble.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:113901, Sep 2013

    2013

  10. [18]

    Dong-Sheng Ding, Hannes Busche, Bao-Sen Shi, Guang-Can Guo, and Charles S. Adams. Phase diagram and self-organizing dynamics in a ther- mal ensemble of strongly interacting rydberg atoms.Phys. Rev. X, 10:021023, Apr 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Dongsheng Ding, Zhengyang Bai, Zongkai Liu, Baosen Shi, Guangcan Guo, Weibin Li, and C. Stuart. Adams. Ergodicity breaking from Ry- dberg clusters in a driven-dissipative many-body system.Sci. Adv., 10(9):adl5893, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Bifurcation of time crystals in driven and dissipative Rydberg atomic gas.Na- ture Commun., 16(1):1419, 2025

    Bang Liu et al. Bifurcation of time crystals in driven and dissipative Rydberg atomic gas.Na- ture Commun., 16(1):1419, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Observation of multiple time crys- tals in a driven-dissipative system with Rydberg gas.Nature Commun., 16(1):8767, 2025

    Yuechun Jiao, Weilun Jiang, Yu Zhang, Jingxu Bai, Yunhui He, Heng Shen, Jianming Zhao, and Suotang Jia. Observation of multiple time crys- tals in a driven-dissipative system with Rydberg gas.Nature Commun., 16(1):8767, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Electric-field sensing with driven-dissipative time crystals in room- temperature rydberg vapor.Scientific Reports, 15(1), April 2025

    Darmindra Arumugam. Electric-field sensing with driven-dissipative time crystals in room- temperature rydberg vapor.Scientific Reports, 15(1), April 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Stark modulated ryd- berg dissipative time crystals at room temper- ature applied to sub-khz electric field sensing

    Darmindra Arumugam. Stark modulated ryd- berg dissipative time crystals at room temper- ature applied to sub-khz electric field sensing. Scientific Reports, 15(1), October 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Injection locking of ry- dberg dissipative time crystals.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16210, 2025

    Darmindra Arumugam. Injection locking of ry- dberg dissipative time crystals.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16210, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Christopher L Holloway, Matt T Simons, Joshua A Gordon, Andrew Dienstfrey, David A Anderson, and Georg Raithel. Electric field metrology for si traceability: Systematic mea- surement uncertainties in electromagnetically in- duced transparency in atomic vapor.Journal of Applied...

    2017

  18. [26]

    A rydberg atom-based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave.Applied Physics Letters, 114(11), 2019

    Matthew T Simons, Abdulaziz H Haddab, Joshua A Gordon, and Christopher L Holloway. A rydberg atom-based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave.Applied Physics Letters, 114(11), 2019

    2019

  19. [27]

    Nonlinear dynamics and chaos addison-wesley.Reading, MA, 1994

    SH Strogatz. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos addison-wesley.Reading, MA, 1994

    1994

  20. [28]

    John D. Cook. Driven van der pol oscillator. 14

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.