arxiv: 2603.15508 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cavity elimination in cavity-QED: a self-consistent input-output approach

Eliott Rambeau , Lo\"ic Lanco

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords cavity QEDmodel reductioninput-output formalismnon-Markovian dynamicsPurcell enhancementeffective atom modelLindblad equation

0 comments

The pith

A self-consistent input-output approach eliminates cavity degrees of freedom in CQED systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to simplify cavity quantum electrodynamics models by removing the cavity while keeping non-adiabatic and non-Markovian effects. It starts from the full input-output formalism for an atom-cavity system coupled to the environment through multiple ports. A self-consistency equation is solved for the atom's reduced dynamics, giving an exact Purcell rate and approximate equations for the effective atom. This produces an effective Lindblad equation with positive and negative decoherence rates that capture memory effects in the cavity. The approach is tested against full simulations for steady states, correlations, and spectra, agreeing well outside the strong-coupling high-excitation limit.

Core claim

We introduce a self-consistent approach to eliminate the cavity degrees of freedom of cavity quantum electrodynamics devices in the non-adiabatic regime. This yields an exact expression for the effective Purcell-enhanced emission rate and, under approximations, self-consistent dynamical equations and input-output relations for the effective two-level atom, including an effective Lindblad equation with two decoherence rates.

What carries the argument

The self-consistency equation derived from the input-output relations that reduces the atom-cavity system to an effective two-level atom model.

If this is right

Computation of effective steady states and output flux beyond low-power regime.
Calculation of two-time correlations and spectral densities with good agreement to full models.
Reduction in model size for CQED devices.
Potential generalization to complex atom-cavity configurations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method may allow analytical solutions for larger open quantum systems involving multiple CQED units.
The appearance of a negative decoherence rate could indicate coherent effects from the eliminated cavity.
Extensions to time-dependent driving or multi-atom systems could be tested numerically.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity can be eliminated using a self-consistency condition that retains the non-Markovian character of the atom dynamics.

What would settle it

Disagreement in the predicted two-time correlation functions or spectral densities between the reduced model and full cavity-QED simulations when operating in the strong-coupling regime with high excitation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.15508 by Eliott Rambeau, Lo\"ic Lanco.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Reflected (first column), transmitted (second column) and emitted (third column) fluxes in units of the input flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Reflected (first column), transmitted (second column) and emitted (third column) fluxes in units of the input flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectral density of the scattered incoherent light, summed over all CC ports (first column) and AC ports (second [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Second-order auto-correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Reflected flux, in units of the input flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spectral density of the reflected incoherent light, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Second-order auto-correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Simplifying composite open quantum systems through model reduction is central to enable their analytical and numerical understanding. In this work, we introduce a self-consistent approach to eliminate the cavity degrees of freedom of cavity quantum electrodynamics (CQED) devices in the non-adiabatic regime, where the cavity memory time is comparable with the timescales of the atom dynamics. To do so, we consider a CQED system consisting of a two-level atom coupled to a single-mode cavity, both subsystems interacting with the environment through an arbitrary number of ports, within the input-output formalism. A self-consistency equation is derived for the reduced atom dynamics. This allows retrieving an exact expression for the effective Purcell-enhanced emission rate and, under reasonable approximations, a set of self-consistent dynamical equations and input-output relations for the effective two level atom. The resulting reduced model captures non-Markovian features, characterized through an effective Lindblad equation exhibiting two decoherence rates, a positive and a negative one. In the continuous-wave excitation regime, we benchmark our approach by computing effective steady states and output flux expressions beyond the low-power excitation regime, for which a semi-classical treatment is usually applied. We also compute two-time correlations and spectral densities, showing an excellent agreement with full cavity quantum electrodynamics simulations, except in the strong-coupling, high-excitation regime. Our results provide a practical framework for reducing the size of CQED models, which could be generalized to more complex atom and cavity configurations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a self-consistent way to drop the cavity from CQED in the non-adiabatic regime, recovering the exact Purcell rate and an effective non-Markovian Lindblad model with one positive and one negative rate that matches full numerics outside strong coupling.

read the letter

The main point is that this work supplies a practical reduction for CQED systems when the cavity memory time is comparable to the atom timescales. It starts from the input-output formalism, derives a self-consistency equation for the cavity elimination, and arrives at an effective two-level atom description whose Lindblad form carries both positive and negative decoherence rates. That signed-rate structure is what preserves the non-Markovian character without keeping the cavity mode explicitly. They also recover an exact expression for the Purcell-enhanced emission rate as a direct check on the construction. Under the stated approximations the reduced equations and input-output relations close, and the benchmarks in the continuous-wave regime show good agreement on steady states, output fluxes, and two-time correlations with the full cavity QED simulations. The match holds beyond the usual low-power semiclassical limit, which is useful. The paper is clear that the reduced model deviates once the atom-cavity coupling becomes comparable to the other rates, so the operating window is stated rather than overstated. The approximations invoked for the dynamical equations are the main place where judgment enters, but they are applied after the self-consistency step and the numerics still line up inside the intended regime. This is the sort of concrete reduction that people who simulate larger atom-cavity networks would reach for. It sits between full master-equation work and crude Markovian shortcuts, and the evidence for the claimed regime is direct. I would send it to peer review; the central construction is new enough and the checks are sufficient to justify referee time.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a self-consistent approach to eliminate the cavity degrees of freedom in cavity-QED systems in the non-adiabatic regime using the input-output formalism. It derives a self-consistency equation for the reduced atom dynamics, providing an exact expression for the effective Purcell-enhanced emission rate. Under reasonable approximations, it obtains self-consistent dynamical equations and input-output relations for an effective two-level atom, capturing non-Markovian features through an effective Lindblad equation with one positive and one negative decoherence rate. The approach is benchmarked in the continuous-wave excitation regime against full CQED simulations for steady states, output fluxes, two-time correlations, and spectral densities, showing excellent agreement except in the strong-coupling, high-excitation regime.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, this provides a practical framework for reducing CQED model size while retaining non-Markovian atom dynamics, useful for analytical and numerical studies of composite open quantum systems. The exact Purcell rate and extension to beyond low-power regimes are notable; explicit acknowledgment of breakdown in strong-coupling high-excitation adds credibility. The approach could generalize to more complex configurations.

major comments (2)

The self-consistency equation is presented as derived from the input-output formalism rather than fitted data, yet the 'reasonable approximations' invoked for the dynamical equations (leading to the reduced non-Markovian model) require explicit justification in the derivation section to rule out circularity when recovering known limits, especially since the model fails when g becomes comparable to other rates.
The effective Lindblad equation is stated to exhibit a positive and a negative decoherence rate; the manuscript must specify the conditions ensuring complete positivity of the density-matrix evolution and the precise regime of validity for this form.

minor comments (2)

Add quantitative error metrics (e.g., relative deviations or R² values) in the benchmarking of steady states, fluxes, and correlations to support the claim of 'excellent agreement' with full simulations.
Clarify in the main text whether the arbitrary number of ports in the abstract is fully implemented or restricted in the numerical examples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive evaluation of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The self-consistency equation is presented as derived from the input-output formalism rather than fitted data, yet the 'reasonable approximations' invoked for the dynamical equations (leading to the reduced non-Markovian model) require explicit justification in the derivation section to rule out circularity when recovering known limits, especially since the model fails when g becomes comparable to other rates.

Authors: We agree that the approximations require more explicit step-by-step justification to eliminate any perception of circularity. In the revised manuscript we will expand the derivation section to derive the approximations directly from the input-output formalism, demonstrate recovery of known limits without circular reasoning, and restate the breakdown conditions when g becomes comparable to other rates, consistent with the benchmarks already shown. revision: yes
Referee: The effective Lindblad equation is stated to exhibit a positive and a negative decoherence rate; the manuscript must specify the conditions ensuring complete positivity of the density-matrix evolution and the precise regime of validity for this form.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The revised manuscript will add an explicit paragraph (or subsection) stating the mathematical conditions on the positive and negative rates that guarantee complete positivity of the density-matrix evolution, together with the precise regime of validity (non-adiabatic regime excluding strong-coupling high-excitation, as already benchmarked). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives a self-consistency equation for cavity elimination directly from the input-output formalism applied to the full CQED Hamiltonian and bath couplings. This produces an exact effective Purcell rate expression without reference to fitted data or target outputs. The reduced dynamical equations and input-output relations follow from stated approximations that are then benchmarked against independent full-system numerics, with explicit agreement reported except outside the claimed regime. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a definitional tautology; the central construction retains independent content through its explicit derivation and external validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the standard input-output formalism of open quantum systems and the assumption that a self-consistency closure exists for the cavity field; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Input-output formalism for open quantum systems with arbitrary ports
Used to couple both atom and cavity to the environment; invoked throughout the derivation.
ad hoc to paper Existence of a self-consistency equation that eliminates cavity variables while preserving non-Markovian atom dynamics
Central to the reduction; stated as derived but its validity range is limited per the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5562 in / 1494 out tokens · 40969 ms · 2026-05-15T10:00:09.131651+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 150 canonical work pages

[1]

atom-like

Had they not, the equality ˆF|0⟩ E = 0would not be fulfilled and the expected dy- namics would naturally go beyond the monoexponen- tial behavior, for a vacuum input in all ports. Since the expression ˆF= (ˆσ z −x ˆI) ˆΩ 2 directly follows from the approximation of a slowly-evolving effective drive, i.e ˆF− ˙ˆF κ′ + ¨ˆF κ′2 ≈ ˆF, it is only natural that m...

work page
[2]

S.HarocheandJ.-M.Raimond,Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons(OxfordUniversityPress, 2006)

work page 2006
[3]

Walther, B

H. Walther, B. T. H. Varcoe, B.-G. Englert, and T. Becker, Cavity quantum electrodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys.69, 1325 (2006)

work page 2006
[4]

Blais, A

A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

work page 2021
[5]

Reiserer and G

A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- 30 works with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1379 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

H. J. Kimble, Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED, Phys. Scr.1998, 127 (1998)

work page 1998
[7]

Blatt and C

R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions, Nat. Phys.8, 277 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

Janitz, M

E. Janitz, M. K. Bhaskar, and L. Childress, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with color centers in dia- mond, Optica7, 1232 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

Bradac, W

C. Bradac, W. Gao, J. Forneris, M. E. Trusheim, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum nanophotonics with group IV defects in diamond, Nat. Commun.10, 5625 (2019)

work page 2019
[10]

González-Tudela, A

A. González-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. García-Ripoll, and F. J. García-Vidal, Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 166 (2024)

work page 2024
[11]

Senellart, G

P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nat. Nanotechnol.12, 1026 (2017)

work page 2017
[12]

R. J. Thompson, G. Rempe, and H. J. Kimble, Observa- tion of normal-mode splitting for an atom in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1132 (1992)

work page 1992
[13]

Khitrova, H

G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, M. Kira, S. W. Koch, and A. Scherer, Vacuum Rabi splitting in semiconductors, Nat. Phys.2, 81 (2006)

work page 2006
[14]

Yoshie, A

T. Yoshie, A. Scherer, J. Hendrickson, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, G. Rupper, C. Ell, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quan- tum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity, Nature432, 200 (2004)

work page 2004
[15]

Gleyzes, S

S. Gleyzes, S. Kuhr, C. Guerlin, J. Bernu, S. Deléglise, U. B. Hoff, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity, Nature446, 297 (2007)

work page 2007
[16]

Grangier, J

P. Grangier, J. A. Levenson, and J.-P. Poizat, Quantum non-demolition measurements in optics, Nature396, 537 (1998)

work page 1998
[17]

Mivehvar, F

F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cav- ity QED with quantum gases: New paradigms in many- body physics, Adv. Phys.70, 1 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

McKeever, A

J. McKeever, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, J. R. Buck, and H. J. Kimble, Experimental realization of a one-atom laser in the regime of strong coupling, Nature425, 268 (2003)

work page 2003
[19]

Brune, E

M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C.Wunderlich, J.M.Raimond,andS.Haroche,Observ- ingtheprogressivedecoherenceofthe“meter” inaquan- tum measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4887 (1996)

work page 1996
[20]

Campagne-Ibarcq, E

P. Campagne-Ibarcq, E. Flurin, N. Roch, D. Darson, P. Morfin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, F. Mallet, and B. Huard, Persistent control of a superconducting qubit by stroboscopic measurement feedback, Phys. Rev. X3, 021008 (2013)

work page 2013
[21]

Sarlette, Z

A. Sarlette, Z. Leghtas, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and P. Rouchon, Stabilization of nonclassical states of one- and two-mode radiation fields by reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A86, 012114 (2012)

work page 2012
[22]

H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

work page 2008
[23]

T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Quantum computers, Na- ture464, 45 (2010)

work page 2010
[24]

Blais, S

A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, and W. D. Oliver, Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 247 (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

Somaschi, V

N. Somaschi, V. Giesz, L. D. Santis, J. C. Loredo, M. P. Almeida, G. Hornecker, S. L. Portalupi, T. Grange, C. Antón, J. Demory, C. Gómez, I. Sagnes, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Lemaître, A. Auffeves, A. G. White, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart, Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state, Nat. Photonics10, 340 (2016)

work page 2016
[26]

Couteau, S

C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. J. Shields, and G. Weihs, Ap- plications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 326 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

Thomas, L

P. Thomas, L. Ruscio, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, Effi- cient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom, Nature608, 677 (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

Duan and H

L.-M. Duan and H. J. Kimble, Scalable photonic quan- tum computation through cavity-assisted interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 127902 (2004)

work page 2004
[29]

Le Jeannic, A

H. Le Jeannic, A. Tiranov, J. Carolan, T. Ramos, Y. Wang, M. H. Appel, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Lud- wig, N. Rotenberg, L. Midolo, J. J. García-Ripoll, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl, Dynamical photon–photon in- teraction mediated by a quantum emitter, Nat. Phys. 18, 1191 (2022)

work page 2022
[30]

Monroe, Quantum information processing with atoms and photons, Nature416, 238 (2002)

C. Monroe, Quantum information processing with atoms and photons, Nature416, 238 (2002)

work page 2002
[31]

Pichler, S

H. Pichler, S. Choi, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Uni- versal photonic quantum computation via time-delayed feedback, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 11362 (2017)

work page 2017
[32]

H. J. Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Op- tics 2(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

work page 2007
[33]

Larson and T

J. Larson and T. Mavrogordatos,The Jaynes– Cummings Model and its Descendants (Second Edition): Modern Research Directions(IOP Publishing, 2024)

work page 2024
[34]

H. J. Carmichael, R. J. Brecha, M. G. Raizen, H. J. Kimble, and P. R. Rice, Subnatural linewidth averaging for coupled atomic and cavity-mode oscillators, Phys. Rev. A40, 5516 (1989)

work page 1989
[35]

L.C.Andreani, G.Panzarini,andJ.-M.Gérard,Strong- coupling regime for quantum boxes in pillar microcavi- ties: Theory, Phys. Rev. B60, 13276 (1999)

work page 1999
[36]

Auffèves, B

A. Auffèves, B. Besga, J.-M. Gérard, and J.-P. Poizat, Spontaneous emission spectrum of a two-level atom in a very-high-Qcavity, Phys. Rev. A77, 063833 (2008)

work page 2008
[37]

C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differ- ential equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985)

work page 1985
[38]

C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Op- tics(Springer, 2004)

work page 2004
[39]

Caneva, M

T. Caneva, M. T. Manzoni, T. Shi, J. S. Douglas, J. I. Cirac, and D. E. Chang, Quantum dynamics of prop- agating photons with strong interactions: a general- ized input–output formalism, New J. Phys.17, 113001 (2015)

work page 2015
[40]

H.FlayacandV.Savona,Input-outputtheoryoftheun- conventional photon blockade, Phys. Rev. A88, 033836 (2013)

work page 2013
[41]

Xu and S

S. Xu and S. Fan, Input-output formalism for few- photon transport: A systematic treatment beyond two photons, Phys. Rev. A91, 043845 (2015). 31

work page 2015
[42]

H. J. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics(Springer, 1993)

work page 1993
[43]

D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

work page 2008
[44]

S. Fan, Ş. E. Kocabaş, and J.-T. Shen, Input-output formalism for few-photon transport in one-dimensional nanophotonic waveguides coupled to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A82, 063821 (2010)

work page 2010
[45]

Lalumière, B

K. Lalumière, B. C. Sanders, A. F. van Loo, A. Fe- dorov, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Input-output theory for waveguide QED with an ensemble of inhomogeneous atoms, Phys. Rev. A88, 043806 (2013)

work page 2013
[46]

C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2269 (1993)

work page 1993
[47]

H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cas- caded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2273 (1993)

work page 1993
[48]

Gough and M

J. Gough and M. R. James, Quantum feedback net- works: Hamiltonianformulation,Commun.Math.Phys. 287, 1109 (2009)

work page 2009
[49]

Combes, J

J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output net- works, Adv. Phys. X2, 784 (2017)

work page 2017
[50]

Waks and J

E. Waks and J. Vučković, Dipole induced transparency in drop-filter cavity-waveguide systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 153601 (2006)

work page 2006
[51]

Majumdar, D

A. Majumdar, D. Englund, M. Bajcsy, and J. Vučković, Nonlinear temporal dynamics of a strongly coupled quantum-dot–cavity system, Phys. Rev. A85, 033802 (2012)

work page 2012
[52]

Auffèves-Garnier, C

A. Auffèves-Garnier, C. Simon, J.-M. Gérard, and J.-P. Poizat, Giant optical nonlinearity induced by a single two-level system interacting with a cavity in the Purcell regime, Phys. Rev. A75, 053823 (2007)

work page 2007
[53]

L. A. Lugiato, Optical bistability, Contemp. Phys.24, 333 (1983)

work page 1983
[54]

C. M. Savage and H. J. Carmichael, Single atom optical bistability, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.24, 1495 (1988)

work page 1988
[55]

J. I. Cirac, Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit, Phys. Rev. A46, 4354 (1992)

work page 1992
[56]

Warszawski and H

P. Warszawski and H. M. Wiseman, Adiabatic elimi- nation in compound quantum systems with feedback, Phys. Rev. A63, 013803 (2000)

work page 2000
[57]

Lax, Quantum noise

M. Lax, Quantum noise. X. Density-matrix treatment of field and population-difference fluctuations, Phys. Rev. 157, 213 (1967)

work page 1967
[58]

Haken, Analogy between higher instabilities in fluids and lasers, Phys

H. Haken, Analogy between higher instabilities in fluids and lasers, Phys. Lett. A53, 77 (1975)

work page 1975
[59]

Rep.219, 153 (1992)

C.Cohen-Tannoudji,Atomicmotioninlaserlight,Phys. Rep.219, 153 (1992)

work page 1992
[60]

Dalibard and C

J. Dalibard and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Laser cooling be- low the doppler limit by polarization gradients: simple theoretical models, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B6, 2023 (1989)

work page 2023
[61]

Mirrahimi and P

M. Mirrahimi and P. Rouchon, Singular perturbations and Lindblad-Kossakowski differential equations, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control54, 1325 (2009)

work page 2009
[62]

Azouit, F

R. Azouit, F. Chittaro, A. Sarlette, and P. Rouchon, To- wards generic adiabatic elimination for bipartite open quantum systems, Quantum Sci. Technol.2, 044011 (2017)

work page 2017
[63]

Piccione, S

N. Piccione, S. Felicetti, and B. Bellomo, Two-photon- interaction effects in the bad-cavity limit, Phys. Rev. A 105, L011702 (2022)

work page 2022
[64]

F.-M. L. Régent and P. Rouchon, Adiabatic elimination for composite open quantum systems: Reduced model formulation and numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032603 (2024)

work page 2024
[65]

A. N. Tikhonov, Systems of differential equations con- taining small parameters in the derivatives, Mat. Sb. (N.S.)31, 575 (1952)

work page 1952
[66]

Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations, J

N. Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations, J. Differ. Equ.31, 53 (1979)

work page 1979
[67]

Finkelstein-Shapiro, D

D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, D. Viennot, I. Saideh, T. Hansen, T. Pullerits, and A. Keller, Adiabatic elimination and subspace evolution of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A101, 042102 (2020)

work page 2020
[68]

Saideh, D

I. Saideh, D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, T. Pullerits, and A. Keller, Projection-based adiabatic elimination of bi- partite open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A102, 032212 (2020)

work page 2020
[69]

Tokieda and A

M. Tokieda and A. Riva, Time-convolutionless master equation applied to adiabatic elimination, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052206 (2025)

work page 2025
[70]

S. B. Jäger, T. Schmit, G. Morigi, M. J. Holland, and R. Betzholz, Lindblad master equations for quantum systems coupled to dissipative bosonic modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 063601 (2022)

work page 2022
[71]

Burgarth, P

D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, H. Nakazato, S. Pascazio, and K. Yuasa, Eternal adiabaticity in quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. A103, 032214 (2021)

work page 2021
[72]

Macieszczak, M

K. Macieszczak, M. Guţă, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Towards a theory of metastability in open quan- tum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 240404 (2016)

work page 2016
[73]

Brion, L

E. Brion, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer, Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.40, 1033 (2007)

work page 2007
[74]

J.S.Douglas, H.Habibian, C.-L.Hung, A.V.Gorshkov, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals, Nat. Photonics9, 326 (2015)

work page 2015
[75]

Reiter and A

F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator formal- ism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

work page 2012
[76]

H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum theory of field-quadrature measurements, Phys. Rev. A47, 642 (1993)

work page 1993
[77]

Damanet, A

F. Damanet, A. J. Daley, and J. Keeling, Atom-only descriptionsofthedriven-dissipativeDickemodel,Phys. Rev. A99, 033845 (2019)

work page 2019
[78]

Grigoletto and F

T. Grigoletto and F. Ticozzi, Model reduction for quan- tum systems: Discrete-time quantum walks and open Markov dynamics, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory71, 8524 (2025)

work page 2025
[79]

Grigoletto, Y

T. Grigoletto, Y. Tao, F. Ticozzi, and L. Viola, Exact model reduction for continuous-time open quantum dy- namics, Quantum9, 1814 (2025)

work page 2025
[80]

G.Dridi, S.Guérin, H.R.Jauslin,andD.V.G.Jolicard, Adiabatic approximation for quantum dissipative sys- tems: Formulation, topology, and superadiabatic track- ing, Phys. Rev. A82, 022109 (2010)

work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.