arxiv: 2603.16225 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

An Energetic Constraint for Qubit-Qubit Entanglement

Kiarn T. Laverick , Samyak P. Prasad , Pascale Senellart , Maria Maffei , Alexia Auff\`eves

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 10:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords qubit entanglementcoherent energyconcurrenceenergetic constraintlocal energy preservationquantum coherencemixed-state decomposition

0 comments

The pith

The coherent energy deficit in two qubits is exactly proportional to the square of their concurrence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that when two qubits undergo processes that preserve their individual energies, any entanglement that forms reduces the coherent part of each qubit's energy. This reduction, called the coherent energy deficit, turns out to be directly proportional to the square of the concurrence for pure states. For mixed states the deficit splits into a quantum piece that averages the square concurrences of pure-state components and a classical piece from the overall mixedness. Minimizing the quantum piece over all possible decompositions recovers the square concurrence of the mixed state itself. This establishes a concrete energetic trade-off: building entanglement necessarily costs coherent energy under local energy conservation.

Core claim

Under locally energy-preserving processes, the coherent energy deficit of a qubit-qubit state equals the square concurrence for pure states. For a general mixed state the deficit decomposes into a quantum component equal to the average square concurrence over any pure-state decomposition and a classical component set by the state's mixedness. The minimum possible quantum component over all decompositions is exactly the square concurrence of the mixture.

What carries the argument

The coherent energy deficit, obtained by subtracting the actual coherent energies from their maximum value in pure separable states, under the decomposition of each qubit's internal energy into coherent and incoherent parts.

If this is right

Any protocol that generates or distributes qubit entanglement must supply or account for the corresponding coherent-energy loss.
The classical mixedness of a state contributes an extra energy deficit beyond the entanglement itself.
Minimizing the quantum energy deficit over decompositions provides a new operational definition of concurrence.
Entanglement witnesses can be constructed directly from coherent-energy measurements under local preservation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Energy measurements alone could certify the amount of entanglement without full tomography.
The same deficit relation might serve as a resource accounting tool in quantum thermodynamic protocols that also generate entanglement.
Extending the decomposition to non-qubit systems could reveal whether similar energetic bounds exist for higher-dimensional entanglement.

Load-bearing premise

Internal energy of each qubit can be split into coherent and incoherent parts, and the dynamics preserve local energy.

What would settle it

Prepare a two-qubit state with known concurrence, measure the coherent energies of each qubit before and after an energy-preserving interaction, compute the deficit, and check whether it equals the square concurrence to within experimental error.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.16225 by Alexia Auff\`eves, Kiarn T. Laverick, Maria Maffei, Pascale Senellart, Samyak P. Prasad.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Entanglement that Alice (solid lines) and Eve (dot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We analyze qubit-qubit entanglement from an energetic perspective and reveal an energetic trade-off between quantum coherence and entanglement. We decompose each qubit internal energy into a coherent and an incoherent component. The qubits' coherent energies are maximal if the qubit-qubit state is pure and separable. They decrease as qubit-qubit entanglement builds up under locally-energy-preserving processes. This yields a ``coherent energy deficit'' that we show is proportional to a well-known measure of entanglement, the square concurrence. In general, a qubit-qubit state can always be represented as a mixture of pure states. Then, the coherent energy deficit splits into a quantum component, corresponding to the average square concurrence of the pure states, and a classical one reflecting the mixedness of the joint state. Minimizing the quantum deficit over the possible pure state decompositions yields the square concurrence of the mixture. Our findings bring out new figures of merit to optimize and secure entanglement generation and distribution under energetic constraints.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper ties coherent energy deficit directly to square concurrence for two qubits under energy-preserving ops, with a plausible extension to mixed states, but the minimization step for mixtures needs a convexity check.

read the letter

This paper shows that the coherent energy deficit built from local energy-preserving processes is proportional to the square concurrence for two qubits. For mixed states, minimizing the quantum part of that deficit over pure-state decompositions is claimed to recover the concurrence squared of the mixture. That's the central result. The work does a good job laying out the energy decomposition into coherent and incoherent components and deriving the deficit from the drop in coherent energy as entanglement forms. The proportionality for pure states follows directly from the assumptions about the processes, and it gives a tangible link between energy and entanglement that isn't just a restatement of existing measures. The split into quantum and classical deficits for mixed states is a reasonable way to handle the mixedness, and the minimization step aims to connect back to the standard concurrence. The math looks mostly solid on the pure-state side, with no obvious free parameters or invented entities. The citation pattern in the abstract seems standard for quantum information. The potential soft spot is in the mixed-state claim. Concurrence is defined as the infimum of the average concurrence over decompositions, but minimizing the average of the squares is a different operation. By strict convexity of the square function, the minimized average square is generally larger than the square of the minimized average, unless the optimal decomposition has all components with the same concurrence value. The paper asserts that the energy minimization yields exactly the square concurrence, so it would help to see an explicit proof or example showing that the two infima coincide here, or that the energy constraint selects an ensemble where the values are equal. If that's not shown, the claim might need qualification. This paper is for people working on quantum resources, energy in quantum systems, or practical entanglement generation in constrained settings. A reader interested in new figures of merit for quantum networks would get value from it. It deserves a serious referee because the idea is original enough and the derivation is plausible, even if one section needs tightening. I recommend sending it out for peer review rather than desk rejecting it.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an energetic constraint on qubit-qubit entanglement by decomposing each qubit's internal energy into coherent and incoherent parts. Under locally energy-preserving processes the coherent energy deficit is shown to be proportional to the square concurrence for pure states. For mixed states the deficit decomposes into a quantum part (average square concurrence over pure-state decompositions) and a classical part; minimizing the quantum part over all decompositions is claimed to recover the square concurrence of the mixture.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the work supplies a physically motivated, parameter-free relation between an energetic quantity and a standard entanglement monotone, together with an explicit trade-off between coherence and entanglement under energy-preserving dynamics. This could furnish new optimization criteria for entanglement generation and distribution protocols that respect local energy constraints.

major comments (1)

[Abstract (final paragraph) and the section deriving the mixed-state relation] The mixed-state claim (that the energy-derived minimization of the average square concurrence over decompositions equals [C(ρ)]²) is load-bearing for the central result. Because x ↦ x² is strictly convex, inf ∑ p_i C(ψ_i)² ≥ [inf ∑ p_i C(ψ_i)]² = [C(ρ)]², with equality only when an optimal ensemble exists in which every C(ψ_i) is identical. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the coherent-energy minimization selects such an ensemble or otherwise prove that the two infima coincide for general two-qubit states.

minor comments (2)

[Section introducing the energy decomposition] Notation for the coherent/incoherent energy decomposition and the precise definition of the 'quantum component' of the deficit should be introduced with explicit equations rather than descriptive prose.
[Derivation of the pure-state relation] The proportionality constant between the coherent energy deficit and C² should be stated explicitly (including any dependence on the local energy scale) so that the relation can be checked numerically for standard states such as Bell states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying this important mathematical point concerning the mixed-state relation. We address the comment directly below and will strengthen the manuscript with an explicit proof of the required equality.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract (final paragraph) and the section deriving the mixed-state relation] The mixed-state claim (that the energy-derived minimization of the average square concurrence over decompositions equals [C(ρ)]²) is load-bearing for the central result. Because x ↦ x² is strictly convex, inf ∑ p_i C(ψ_i)² ≥ [inf ∑ p_i C(ψ_i)]² = [C(ρ)]², with equality only when an optimal ensemble exists in which every C(ψ_i) is identical. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the coherent-energy minimization selects such an ensemble or otherwise prove that the two infima coincide for general two-qubit states.

Authors: We agree that the strict convexity of x ↦ x² implies the inequality in general and that equality requires an optimal decomposition in which all pure states have identical concurrence. For two-qubit states this is always possible: the concurrence is given explicitly by the square root of the largest eigenvalue of ρρ̃, and the convex-roof infimum is attained by an ensemble constructed from the eigenvectors of the spin-flipped operator in which every pure state shares the same concurrence value. Consequently the infima coincide, the coherent-energy minimization recovers exactly [C(ρ)]², and the claimed relation holds. We will insert a short subsection (immediately after the mixed-state decomposition) that proves the existence of such an equal-concurrence ensemble for arbitrary two-qubit ρ and thereby justifies the equality. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Coherent deficit derived from energy decomposition; no tautological reduction to concurrence

full rationale

The paper defines the coherent energy deficit from the decomposition of each qubit's internal energy into coherent and incoherent components, then shows under locally-energy-preserving processes that this deficit is proportional to square concurrence via direct calculation on pure states. The mixed-state extension splits the deficit into quantum (average square concurrence over decompositions) and classical parts, with minimization claimed to recover the mixture's square concurrence. This follows from the stated process assumptions and standard convex-roof properties rather than any self-definition, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the target result; the derivation remains self-contained against the energetic premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that qubit internal energy admits a coherent-incoherent decomposition and that the dynamics are locally energy-preserving; no free parameters are introduced and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Each qubit's internal energy decomposes into coherent and incoherent components
This decomposition is the starting point used to define the coherent energy deficit.
domain assumption The processes considered are locally-energy-preserving
This condition is required for the coherent energies to decrease as entanglement increases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1382 out tokens · 53274 ms · 2026-05-15T10:35:29.678460+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

clone” (“anti-clone

C[ρAB] = p 2(1 − Tr[(ρm)2]) = 2 √detρm, where ρm is the reduced state of qubit m = A, B, ρm = Em|1⟩⟨1| + q E m C (ϵm|1⟩⟨0| + (ϵm)∗|0⟩⟨1|) + (1 − Em)|0⟩⟨0| . (3) For convenience, we now define the scaled square concur- rence as C 2 = C2/4 where we drop the argument of the concurrence for notational simplicity. As an aside, this scaled square concurrence, f...

work page
[2]

Thus if Eve were to intercept this pure state, she would have access to the full entangled resource

To quantify its amount of entanglement, we use our metric 2C 2[|Ψ+⟩⟨Ψ+|] = 1 /2, which is the same for Alice and Eve. Thus if Eve were to intercept this pure state, she would have access to the full entangled resource. This will clearly be the case for any pure state that Bob sends. Thus, to reduce the amount of entanglement Eve can obtain compared to Ali...

work page 2030
[3]

Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,

C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schu- macher, “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,” Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996)

work page 2046
[4]

Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits,

S. A. Hill and W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997)

work page 1997
[5]

En- tanglement in many-body systems,

L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, “En- tanglement in many-body systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 517–576 (2008)

work page 2008
[6]

Quantum entanglement,

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009)

work page 2009
[7]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010)

work page 2010
[8]

Are the laws of entanglement theory thermodynamical?

M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, and R. Horodecki, “Are the laws of entanglement theory thermodynamical?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240403 (2002)

work page 2002
[9]

Second law of entanglement manipulation with an entanglement battery,

R. Ganardi, T. V. Kondra, N. HY. Ng, and A. Streltsov, “Second law of entanglement manipulation with an entanglement battery,” Physical Review Letters 135, 010202 (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

Energy cost and optimal entan- glement production in harmonic chains,

F. Galve and E. Lutz, “Energy cost and optimal entan- glement production in harmonic chains,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 032327 (2009)

work page 2009
[11]

Enhancing quantum entanglement by photon addition and subtraction,

C. Navarrete-Benlloch, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, J. H. Shapiro, and N. J. Cerf, “Enhancing quantum entanglement by photon addition and subtraction,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 012328 (2012)

work page 2012
[12]

Thermodynamic cost of creating correlations,

M. Huber, M. Perarnau-Llobet, K. V. Hovhannisyan, P. Skrzypczyk, C. Kl¨ ockl, N. Brunner, and A. Ac´ ın, “Thermodynamic cost of creating correlations,” New J. Phys. 17, 065008 (2015)

work page 2015
[13]

Thermodynamics of creating correlations: Limitations and optimal protocols,

D. E. Bruschi, M. Perarnau-Llobet, N. Friis, K. V. Hov- hannisyan, and M. Huber, “Thermodynamics of creating correlations: Limitations and optimal protocols,” Phys. Rev. E 91, 032118 (2015)

work page 2015
[14]

Energy bounds for entangled states,

N. Piccione, B. Militello, A. Napoli, and B. Bellomo, “Energy bounds for entangled states,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022057 (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

Canonical distillation of entanglement,

T. Das, A. Kumar, A. K. Pal, N. Shukla, A. S. De, and U. Sen, “Canonical distillation of entanglement,” Phys. Lett. A 381, 3529–3535 (2017)

work page 2017
[16]

Energy cost of entanglement extraction in com- plex quantum systems,

C. B´ eny, C. T. Chubb, T. Farrelly, and T. J. Os- borne, “Energy cost of entanglement extraction in com- plex quantum systems,” Nat. Commun. 9, 3792 (2018)

work page 2018
[17]

Minimal energy cost of entanglement extraction,

L. Hackl and R. H. Jonsson, “Minimal energy cost of entanglement extraction,” Quantum 3, 165 (2019)

work page 2019
[18]

Quantification of the en- ergy consumption of entanglement distribution,

K. Horodecki, M. Winczewski, L. Sikorski, P. Mazurek, M. Czechlewski, and R. Yehia, “Quantification of the en- ergy consumption of entanglement distribution,” (2025), arXiv:2507.23108 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Energetic analysis of emerging quantum communication protocols,

R. Yehia, Y. Pi´ etri, C. Pascual-Garc´ ıa, P. Lefebvre, and F. Centrone, “Energetic analysis of emerging quantum communication protocols,” (2024), arXiv:2410.10661 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Optimal quantum operations at zero energy cost,

G. Chiribella and Y. Yang, “Optimal quantum operations at zero energy cost,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 022327 (2017)

work page 2017
[21]

Entanglement generation from athermality,

A. de Oliveira Junior, J. Son, J. Czartowski, and N. H. Y Ng, “Entanglement generation from athermality,” Phys. Rev. Research 6, 033236 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Cohen-Tannoudji, J

C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-photon interactions: basic processes and applica- tions (John Wiley & Sons, 2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Multiphoton entangle- ment and interferometry,

J.-W. Pan, Z.-B. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, and M. ˙Zukowski, “Multiphoton entangle- ment and interferometry,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012)

work page 2012
[24]

Quantum interference between transverse spatial waveguide modes,

A. Mohanty, M. Zhang, A. Dutt, S. Ramelow, P. Nussen- zveig, and M. Lipson, “Quantum interference between transverse spatial waveguide modes,” Nat. Commun. 8, 14010 (2017)

work page 2017
[25]

Photon-number entanglement generated by se- quential excitation of a two-level atom,

S. Wein, J. C. Loredo, M. Maffei, P. Hilaire, A. Harouri, N. Somaschi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, L. Lanco, O. Krebs, A. Auff` eves, C. Simon, P. Senellart, and C. Ant´ on- Solanas, “Photon-number entanglement generated by se- quential excitation of a two-level atom,” Nat. Photon. 16, 374–379 (2022)

work page 2022
[26]

The energetic cost of work extraction,

J. Monsel, M. Fellous-Asiani, B. Huard, and A. Auff` eves, “The energetic cost of work extraction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 130601 (2020)

work page 2020
[27]

Large collective 6 power enhancement in dissipative charging of a quantum battery,

S. Pokhrel and J. Gea-Banacloche, “Large collective 6 power enhancement in dissipative charging of a quantum battery,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 130401 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

Thermodynamics of autonomous optical Bloch equations

S. P. Prasad, M. Maffei, P. A. Camati, C. Elouard, and A. Auff` eves, “Thermodynamics of autonomous optical bloch equations,” (2024), arXiv:2404.09648 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[29]

Thermodynamic framework for coherently driven sys- tems,

M. Schrauwen, A. Daniel, M. Janovitch, and P. P. Potts, “Thermodynamic framework for coherently driven sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 220201 (2025)

work page 2025
[30]

See [32] for de- tails

The term ‘coherent’ can be motivated from the resource theory of coherence [ ? ] as C[ρ] = |⟨a⟩|, for a qubit, is a valid measure of coherence in the energy basis, with |⟨a⟩|2 = C2 being its associated energy. See [32] for de- tails

work page
[31]

Ob- serving the progressive decoherence of the “meter

M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maitre, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Ob- serving the progressive decoherence of the “meter” in a quantum measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4887 (1996)

work page 1996
[32]

Fringe visibility and which-way informa- tion: An inequality,

B.-G. Englert, “Fringe visibility and which-way informa- tion: An inequality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2154 (1996)

work page 1996
[33]

This is a non-local process and should not be confused with a local, energy preserving process

work page
[34]

See the Supplementary Material for details

work page
[35]

Entanglement of formation of an ar- bitrary state of two qubits,

W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an ar- bitrary state of two qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)

work page 1998
[36]

Ordering two-qubit states with concurrence and negativity,

A. Miranowicz and A. Grudka, “Ordering two-qubit states with concurrence and negativity,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 032326 (2004)

work page 2004
[37]

A comparative study of relative entropy of entanglement, concurrence and neg- ativity,

A. Miranowicz and A. Grudka, “A comparative study of relative entropy of entanglement, concurrence and neg- ativity,” J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 6, 542 (2004)

work page 2004
[38]

Volume of the set of separable states,

K. ˙Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewen- stein, “Volume of the set of separable states,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998)

work page 1998
[39]

Experimental analysis of energy transfers between a quantum emitter and light fields,

I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger, S. E. Thomas, M. Maffei, S. C. Wein, M. Pont, N. Belabas, S. Prasad, A. Harouri, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, N. Somaschi, A. Auff` eves, and P. Senellart, “Experimental analysis of energy transfers between a quantum emitter and light fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 260401 (2023)

work page 2023
[40]

Entanglement of assis- tance,

D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, H. Mabuchi, J. A. Smolin, A. Thapliyal, and A. Uhlmann, “Entanglement of assis- tance,” in NASA International Conference on Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications (Springer,

work page
[41]

Ac- cessing which-path information in the absorption and emission of light by a quantum dot in a ramsey sequence,

I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger, M. Maffei, S. C. Wein, S. P. Prasad, H. Lam, D. Fioretto, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, C. Ant´ on-Solanas, P. Senellart, and A. Auff` eves, “Ac- cessing which-path information in the absorption and emission of light by a quantum dot in a ramsey sequence,” (2026), arXiv:2603.13152 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[42]

Quantum energetics, foun- dations, applications,

A. Auff` eves and C. Elouard, “Quantum energetics, foun- dations, applications,” in Roadmap on Quantum Ther- modynamics, Vol. 11, edited by Steve Campbell et al. (IOP Publishing, 2026) p. 012501

work page 2026
[43]

Presence of quantum correlations results in a nonvanishing ergotropic gap,

A. Mukherjee, A. Roy, S. S. Bhattacharya, and M. Banik, “Presence of quantum correlations results in a nonvanishing ergotropic gap,” Phys. Rev. E 93, 052140 (2016)

work page 2016
[44]

Quantum correlations and ergotropy,

G. Francica, “Quantum correlations and ergotropy,” Phys. Rev. E 105, L052101 (2022)

work page 2022
[45]

Ergotropic characterization of continuous- variable entanglement,

B. Polo-Rodr´ ıguez, F. Centrone, G. Adesso, and M. Al- imuddin, “Ergotropic characterization of continuous- variable entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 050201 (2026)

work page 2026
[46]

Mixed- state entanglement and distillation: Is there a “bound

M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, “Mixed- state entanglement and distillation: Is there a “bound” entanglement in nature?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998)

work page 1998
[47]

Two-qubit engine fueled by entanglement and local measurements,

L. Bresque, P. A. Camati, S. Rogers, K. Murch, A. N. Jordan, and A. Auff` eves, “Two-qubit engine fueled by entanglement and local measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 120605 (2021). 7 Supplementary Material: An Energetic Constraint for Qubit-Qubit Entanglement Computation of the coherent deficit for each mode Let us begin by considering the coherent ener...

work page 2021