pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.20414 · v2 · pith:V7ENXO7Gnew · submitted 2026-03-20 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Inverse Electroweak Baryogenesis

Jacopo Azzola , Oleksii Matsedonskyi , Andreas Weiler This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 09:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords baryogenesiselectroweak phase transitionweak sphaleronsbaryon asymmetryglobal chargeinverse phase transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Baryon asymmetry arises as an equilibrium response of weak sphalerons to an approximately conserved global charge during an inverse electroweak phase transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a baryogenesis mechanism in which the matter-antimatter asymmetry is produced through the equilibrium action of weak sphalerons in regions where the ratio of the Higgs field value to temperature remains below one. A bias toward net baryon number appears once an approximately conserved global charge is present, and this charge asymmetry is itself created during a phase transition that alters the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking. The transition need not be the final electroweak one; in particular the mechanism can run during an inverse transition in which baryons are generated behind the advancing wall. Because production is decoupled from a strong first-order electroweak transition, the process can occur at higher temperatures and thereby evade some existing experimental limits.

Core claim

In the presence of an approximately conserved global charge carried either by new states with nonzero hypercharge or by Standard Model fields, weak sphalerons generate a nonzero equilibrium baryon density wherever h/T ≲ 1. The required global charge asymmetry is produced during a phase transition that changes the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking but need not coincide with the final electroweak transition, allowing baryon production to occur behind the wall of an inverse electroweak phase transition.

What carries the argument

The equilibrium response of weak sphalerons to an approximately conserved global charge in regions with unsuppressed transitions (h/T ≲ 1).

If this is right

  • Baryon production is decoupled from the requirement of a direct first-order electroweak phase transition.
  • The mechanism can operate at parametrically higher temperatures than conventional electroweak baryogenesis.
  • Existing experimental constraints tied to the electroweak scale are weakened.
  • The scenario features distinct phase-transition dynamics and phenomenological signatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models containing additional scalars capable of driving a separate high-temperature transition become viable candidates for realizing the required global charge.
  • Gravitational-wave signals from the phase transitions could carry distinctive features linked to the timing of charge generation and baryon production.
  • Collider or cosmological searches for the carriers of the global charge would directly test the setup.

Load-bearing premise

An approximately conserved global charge must exist and must be generated during a phase transition that changes the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement showing that the equilibrium baryon density produced by sphalerons in response to any realizable global charge asymmetry falls short of the observed value across the allowed parameter space.

read the original abstract

We propose a mechanism for baryogenesis in which the baryon asymmetry is generated as an equilibrium response of weak sphalerons in a region where electroweak sphaleron transitions remain unsuppressed, $h/T\lesssim 1$. A nonzero equilibrium baryon density arises in the presence of an approximately conserved global charge, carried either by new states with nonzero hypercharge, or by Standard Model fields themselves. The required global charge asymmetry is generated during a phase transition that changes the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking, but need not coincide with the final electroweak phase transition. In particular, the mechanism can operate during an inverse electroweak phase transition, where baryon number is produced behind the advancing wall, in contrast to conventional electroweak baryogenesis. Because baryon production is decoupled from a direct first-order electroweak phase transition, the scenario can be realized at parametrically higher temperatures than standard electroweak baryogenesis, thereby weakening current experimental constraints. This framework provides a qualitatively distinct route to electroweak baryogenesis, with different parametric dependence, phase-transition dynamics, and phenomenological signatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a mechanism for baryogenesis in which the observed baryon asymmetry arises as an equilibrium response of weak sphalerons in regions satisfying h/T ≲ 1, enabled by an approximately conserved global charge asymmetry. This charge may be carried by new states with nonzero hypercharge or by Standard Model fields and is generated during a phase transition that alters the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking (possibly an inverse electroweak phase transition). Baryon production occurs behind the advancing wall, decoupling the mechanism from the requirement of a strong first-order electroweak phase transition at the final electroweak scale and allowing operation at parametrically higher temperatures.

Significance. If the central assumptions can be realized, the proposal offers a qualitatively distinct route to electroweak baryogenesis with different parametric dependence on the phase-transition dynamics and new phenomenological signatures. It weakens the need for a strong first-order transition at the electroweak scale, potentially relaxing current experimental constraints and broadening the viable temperature range for such scenarios.

major comments (2)
  1. [Mechanism and equilibrium discussion (near the statement of the equilibrium response)] The central equilibrium relation between baryon density n_B and the global charge asymmetry ΔQ holds only if charge-violating processes remain parametrically slower than sphaleron transitions throughout the region h/T ≲ 1. The manuscript does not identify the specific operator (or its dimension and coupling strength) that enforces approximate conservation of the global charge, nor does it compare the charge-violating rate to the sphaleron rate. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that a nonzero equilibrium baryon density is generated.
  2. [Phase-transition and charge-generation section] The global charge asymmetry is stated to be generated during a phase transition that changes the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking but need not coincide with the final electroweak transition. Without an explicit calculation or estimate of the charge-generation efficiency, the wall velocity, or the subsequent dilution/preservation of ΔQ, it is unclear whether a sufficient asymmetry survives to produce the observed n_B/s.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and early sections use h/T ≲ 1 without an immediate reminder that h denotes the Higgs vacuum expectation value; a brief parenthetical definition would improve readability for a broad audience.
  2. [Discussion or conclusions] The manuscript would benefit from a short table or paragraph contrasting the parametric dependence (temperature scale, required phase-transition strength) of inverse electroweak baryogenesis with conventional electroweak baryogenesis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments in turn below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central equilibrium relation between baryon density n_B and the global charge asymmetry ΔQ holds only if charge-violating processes remain parametrically slower than sphaleron transitions throughout the region h/T ≲ 1. The manuscript does not identify the specific operator (or its dimension and coupling strength) that enforces approximate conservation of the global charge, nor does it compare the charge-violating rate to the sphaleron rate. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that a nonzero equilibrium baryon density is generated.

    Authors: We agree that the approximate conservation of the global charge is a load-bearing assumption. The manuscript states that the charge may be carried by new states with nonzero hypercharge or by Standard Model fields, but does not specify the violating operator. In the revised version we will add a short discussion providing an explicit example: a dimension-6 operator suppressed by a scale Λ ≫ T yields a charge-violating rate parametrically smaller than the sphaleron rate Γ_sph ∼ α_w^5 T when Λ is chosen sufficiently large (e.g., Γ_charge ∼ T^5/Λ^2). This establishes the required hierarchy in the h/T ≲ 1 region without altering the central mechanism. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The global charge asymmetry is stated to be generated during a phase transition that changes the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking but need not coincide with the final electroweak transition. Without an explicit calculation or estimate of the charge-generation efficiency, the wall velocity, or the subsequent dilution/preservation of ΔQ, it is unclear whether a sufficient asymmetry survives to produce the observed n_B/s.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript presents the mechanism at a general level and does not contain a model-specific calculation of charge-generation efficiency or dilution. In the revision we will insert a qualitative estimate: for a first-order transition with wall velocity v_w ∼ 0.1–0.5 and charge carried by a species that remains in equilibrium until after the transition, the generated ΔQ can be preserved if charge-violating processes remain slow, yielding n_B/s in the observed range for appropriate choices of the transition strength and temperature. A fully quantitative computation requires a concrete ultraviolet completion, which lies beyond the scope of the present work but is feasible within the framework. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: baryon asymmetry derived from independent global charge generated by phase transition

full rationale

The paper's central mechanism states that a nonzero equilibrium baryon density arises as the response of weak sphalerons to an approximately conserved global charge asymmetry, where the charge itself is generated during a phase transition that alters the strength of electroweak symmetry breaking. This input is independent of the final baryon asymmetry value; the derivation does not fit any parameter to the observed n_B or redefine the target result in terms of itself. No equations, self-citations, or ansatze in the provided abstract reduce the claimed prediction to a tautology or fitted input. The framework remains self-contained, with the load-bearing assumption being the parametric separation of charge-violating rates from sphaleron rates rather than any definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard electroweak sphaleron dynamics plus the introduction of an approximately conserved global charge whose value is set by an unspecified phase transition; no independent evidence for the charge carriers is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • global charge asymmetry
    The magnitude of the conserved charge that sources the equilibrium baryon density is generated by the phase transition but is not fixed by any equation shown in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Weak sphaleron transitions remain active and in equilibrium when h/T ≲ 1
    Invoked to allow nonzero equilibrium baryon density behind the wall; standard in the literature but assumed to hold in the inverse-transition region.
  • domain assumption An approximately conserved global charge exists and is generated by a phase transition altering electroweak symmetry breaking strength
    Central to producing a nonzero baryon density; the abstract does not derive this charge from the Standard Model alone.
invented entities (1)
  • New states with nonzero hypercharge no independent evidence
    purpose: To carry the approximately conserved global charge
    Introduced as one possible realization; no specific mass, coupling, or detection channel is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1755 out tokens · 108898 ms · 2026-05-21T09:56:34.558022+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Baryon Asymmetry from Electroweak-Symmetric Domain Walls

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Electroweak-symmetric domain walls produce the observed baryon asymmetry via CP-violating semiclassical forces, transport, sphalerons, and interference between the two wall faces in a singlet-extended Standard Model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. E. Shaposhnikov,Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in Standard Electroweak Theory,Nucl. Phys. B287(1987) 757–775

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson,Baryogenesis at the weak phase transition,Nucl. Phys. B349(1991) 727–742

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Electroweak baryogenesis,New J. Phys.14(2012) 125003, [1206.2942]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    J. M. Cline,Baryogenesis, inLes Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime, 9, 2006,hep-ph/0609145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Standard Model Baryon Number Violation at Zero Temperature from Higgs Bubble Collisions

    N. Bhusal, S. Blasi, M. Cataldi, A. Chatrchyan, M. Gorghetto and G. Servant,Standard Model Baryon Number Violation at Zero Temperature from Higgs Bubble Collisions,2508.21825

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Shakya,Did our Universe Tunnel out of the Wrong Higgs Vacuum?,2511.08843

    B. Shakya,Did our Universe Tunnel out of the Wrong Higgs Vacuum?,2511.08843

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    J. R. Espinosa, M. Losada and A. Riotto,Symmetry nonrestoration at high temperature in little Higgs models,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 043520, [hep-ph/0409070]. – 18 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Coset Cosmology

    L. Di Luzio, M. Redi, A. Strumia and D. Teresi,Coset Cosmology,JHEP06(2019) 110, [1902.05933]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Electroweak Baryogenesis above the Electroweak Scale

    A. Glioti, R. Rattazzi and L. Vecchi,Electroweak Baryogenesis above the Electroweak Scale, JHEP04(2019) 027, [1811.11740]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Matsedonskyi, J

    O. Matsedonskyi, J. Unwin and Q. Wang,Towards TeV-scale supersymmetric electroweak baryogenesis,JHEP02(2023) 198, [2211.09147]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    High Scale Electroweak Phase Transition: Baryogenesis & Symmetry Non-Restoration

    I. Baldes and G. Servant,High scale electroweak phase transition: baryogenesis\& symmetry non-restoration,JHEP10(2018) 053, [1807.08770]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Matsedonskyi,High-Temperature Electroweak Symmetry Breaking by SM Twins,JHEP04 (2021) 036, [2008.13725]

    O. Matsedonskyi,High-Temperature Electroweak Symmetry Breaking by SM Twins,JHEP04 (2021) 036, [2008.13725]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Matsedonskyi and G

    O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant,High-Temperature Electroweak Symmetry Non-Restoration from New Fermions and Implications for Baryogenesis,JHEP09(2020) 012, [2002.05174]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Badziak, K

    M. Badziak, K. Harigaya and I. Nalkecz,Electroweak symmetry non-restoration and suppressed dark radiation in Supersymmetric Twin Higgs model,2508.15894

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer, J. M. No, M. O. Olea-Romacho and G. Weiglein,The trap in the early Universe: impact on the interplay between gravitational waves and LHC physics in the 2HDM,JCAP03(2023) 031, [2208.14466]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Two-Step Electroweak Baryogenesis

    S. Inoue, G. Ovanesyan and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Two-Step Electroweak Baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 015013, [1508.05404]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Biek¨ otter, S

    T. Biek¨ otter, S. Heinemeyer, J. M. No, M. O. Olea and G. Weiglein,Fate of electroweak symmetry in the early Universe: Non-restoration and trapped vacua in the N2HDM,JCAP06 (2021) 018, [2103.12707]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    M. Aoki, L. Biermann, C. Borschensky, I. P. Ivanov, M. M¨ uhlleitner and H. Shibuya, Intermediate charge-breaking phases and symmetry non-restoration in the 2-Higgs-Doublet Model,JHEP02(2024) 232, [2308.04141]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    R. H. Brandenberger, A.-C. Davis, T. Prokopec and M. Trodden,Local and nonlocal defect mediated electroweak baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4257–4266, [hep-ph/9409281]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    S. A. Abel and P. L. White,Baryogenesis from domain walls in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 4371–4379, [hep-ph/9505241]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  21. [21]

    R. H. Brandenberger, W. Kelly and M. Yamaguchi,Electroweak baryogenesis with embedded domain walls,Prog. Theor. Phys.117(2007) 823–834, [hep-ph/0503211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Y. Bai, J. Berger, M. Korwar and N. Orlofsky,Catalyzed baryogenesis,JHEP10(2021) 147, [2106.12589]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Schr¨ oder and R

    T. Schr¨ oder and R. Brandenberger,Embedded domain walls and electroweak baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 043516, [2404.13035]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Azzola, O

    J. Azzola, O. Matsedonskyi and A. Weiler,Minimal electroweak baryogenesis via domain walls, JHEP04(2025) 103, [2412.10495]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    M. Y. Sassi and G. Moortgat-Pick,Electroweak symmetry restoration in the N2HDM via domain walls,JHEP06(2025) 072, [2407.14468]. – 19 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    A. D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32–35

    work page 1967

  27. [27]

    J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen and K. A. Olive,On the erasure and regeneration of the primordial baryon asymmetry by sphalerons,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 2372–2375, [hep-ph/9304321]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  28. [28]

    Hypercharge and the Cosmological Baryon Asymmetry

    A. Antaramian, L. J. Hall and A. Rasin,Hypercharge and the cosmological baryon asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 3881–3885, [hep-ph/9311279]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  29. [29]

    Electroweak Baryogenesis from a Classical Force

    M. Joyce, T. Prokopec and N. Turok,Electroweak baryogenesis from a classical force,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 1695–1698, [hep-ph/9408339]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  30. [30]

    Joyce, T

    M. Joyce, T. Prokopec and N. Turok,Nonlocal electroweak baryogenesis. Part 2: The Classical regime,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2958–2980, [hep-ph/9410282]

    work page arXiv 1996

  31. [31]

    J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,A New source for electroweak baryogenesis in the MSSM,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 5519–5522, [hep-ph/0002272]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  32. [32]

    J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,Electroweak baryogenesis at high bubble wall velocities,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063525, [2001.00568]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner,Cosmological Baryon and Lepton Number in the Presence of Electroweak Fermion Number Violation,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3344–3349

    work page 1990

  34. [34]

    J. M. Cline and B. Laurent,Electroweak baryogenesis from light fermion sources: A critical study,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 083507, [2108.04249]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Barni,Electroweak Baryogenesis with BARYONET: a self-contained review of the WKB approach,2510.21915

    G. Barni,Electroweak Baryogenesis with BARYONET: a self-contained review of the WKB approach,2510.21915

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Equilibration of right-handed electrons

    D. B¨ odeker and D. Schr¨ oder,Equilibration of right-handed electrons,JCAP05(2019) 010, [1902.07220]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Azzola, O

    J. Azzola, O. Matsedonskyi and A. Weiler,to appear,

    work page

  38. [38]

    S. Y. Khlebnikov,Nonequilibrium charge transport at a first order phase transition,Phys. Lett. B300(1993) 376–380

    work page 1993

  39. [39]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson,Debye screening and baryogenesis during the electroweak phase transition,Phys. Lett. B294(1992) 57–62, [hep-ph/9206214]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  40. [40]

    Joyce, T

    M. Joyce, T. Prokopec and N. Turok,Nonlocal electroweak baryogenesis. Part 1: Thin wall regime,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2930–2957, [hep-ph/9410281]

    work page arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,Diffusion and Debye screening near expanding domain walls, Phys. Lett. B356(1995) 19–25, [hep-ph/9506285]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  42. [42]

    Postma and J

    M. Postma and J. van de Vis,Source terms for electroweak baryogenesis in the vev-insertion approximation beyond leading order,JHEP02(2020) 090, [1910.11794]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    G. C. Dorsch, S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin,On the wall velocity dependence of electroweak baryogenesis,JCAP08(2021) 020, [2106.06547]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Barni, S

    G. Barni, S. Blasi and M. Vanvlasselaer,The hydrodynamics of inverse phase transitions,JCAP 10(2024) 042, [2406.01596]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    A. J. Long, B. Shakya and J. A. Ziegler,Bubble Friction in Symmetry-Restoring Transitions, 2511.10415. – 20 – [46]ACMEcollaboration, V. Andreev et al.,Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron,Nature562(2018) 355–360. – 21 –

    work page arXiv 2018