pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.23351 · v2 · pith:WQR4N55Znew · submitted 2026-03-24 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Laser-Enhanced Contact Optimization in Silicon Photovoltaics: Mechanisms, Reliability, and Predictive Process Design

Donald Intal (1) , Abasifreke U. Ebong (1) ((1) Department of Electrical , Computer Engineering , University of North Carolina at Charlotte , Charlotte , USA) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords laser-enhanced contact optimizationLECOsilicon photovoltaicsTOPConcontact resistivityelectrothermal modelingreliability classificationprocess window design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser-enhanced contact optimization can be modeled as a coupled multiphysics process to define reliable process windows in silicon solar cells.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines laser-enhanced contact optimization (LECO) for simultaneously lowering contact resistivity and metallization-induced recombination in crystalline silicon solar cells, especially TOPCon devices. It treats LECO as a linked electrothermal and microstructural process whose device-level effects are captured through instantaneous regime maps and classifications based on time-dependent performance drift. A predictive workflow is developed that combines transient electrothermal modeling with simplified metrics such as effective diffusion depth and local areal energy density. These tools propagate calibrated thresholds across process recipes to separate beneficial contact optimization from marginal activation or latent damage. The framework also accounts for how fine-line metallization and copper-containing stacks narrow stability margins through current localization and barrier effects.

Core claim

LECO is examined as a coupled multiphysics process that links localized electrothermal activation and microstructural evolution to device-level electrical signatures through an instantaneous regime map and a reliability classification based on time-dependent drift. A predictive workflow couples transient electrothermal modeling with reduced state metrics, including effective diffusion depth and local areal energy density, and propagates calibrated thresholds across the recipe space. The framework separates stable optimization from marginal activation and latent damage, while explaining why fine-line scaling and copper-containing contact stacks can tighten stability margins through current

What carries the argument

Instantaneous regime map and time-dependent drift reliability classification that connect localized electrothermal activation and microstructural changes to device electrical performance in LECO.

If this is right

  • Process windows can be designed to retain simultaneous gains in fill factor and open-circuit voltage.
  • Fine-line scaling increases the risk of instability due to current localization effects.
  • Copper-containing contact stacks require additional diffusion-barrier considerations to maintain reliability.
  • Digital-twin methods become feasible for recipe optimization in high-efficiency cell production.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same regime-mapping approach could be tested on other laser-based steps such as doping or ablation in solar cell flows.
  • Real-time sensor data might be folded into the reduced-state metrics to enable closed-loop process control.
  • Field-deployed modules could supply long-term drift data to refine the time-dependent reliability thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

Transient electrothermal modeling combined with reduced metrics such as effective diffusion depth and local areal energy density can reliably propagate thresholds across process conditions and separate stable optimization from latent damage in architecture-dependent interfaces.

What would settle it

A LECO-treated cell classified by the model as stable shows measurable time-dependent increase in contact resistivity or recombination current, or a cell classified as unstable shows no such drift under accelerated testing.

read the original abstract

Laser-enhanced contact optimization (LECO) has emerged as an important method for simultaneously reducing contact resistivity and metallization-induced recombination in advanced crystalline silicon solar cells, thereby enabling concurrent gains in fill factor and open-circuit voltage, particularly in TOPCon devices. However, broader industrial transferability remains constrained by the need to preserve these gains within a narrow process window and by unresolved, architecture-dependent questions regarding the kinetic stability of some LECO-modified interfaces. LECO is therefore examined in this review as a coupled multiphysics process that links localized electrothermal activation and microstructural evolution to device-level electrical signatures through an instantaneous regime map and a reliability classification based on time-dependent drift. A predictive workflow is outlined that couples transient electrothermal modeling with reduced state metrics, including effective diffusion depth and local areal energy density, and propagates calibrated thresholds across the recipe space. The framework separates stable optimization from marginal activation and latent damage, while explaining why fine-line scaling and copper-containing contact stacks can tighten stability margins through current localization and diffusion-barrier constraints. These insights provide a basis for reliability-aware process-window design and future digital-twin-assisted optimization of LECO for scalable, high-efficiency silicon photovoltaics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews laser-enhanced contact optimization (LECO) in crystalline silicon solar cells, particularly TOPCon devices. It frames LECO as a coupled multiphysics process linking localized electrothermal activation and microstructural evolution to device-level electrical signatures. The review introduces an instantaneous regime map and a time-dependent drift reliability classification, then outlines a predictive workflow that couples transient electrothermal modeling with reduced-state metrics (effective diffusion depth and local areal energy density) to propagate calibrated thresholds across the recipe space. This framework is claimed to separate stable optimization from marginal activation and latent damage while explaining tighter stability margins in fine-line scaling and copper-containing stacks due to current localization and diffusion-barrier effects.

Significance. If the proposed reduced-state metrics and regime map prove robust, the work could provide a useful conceptual basis for reliability-aware LECO process design and digital-twin optimization in high-efficiency photovoltaics. The integration of multiphysics considerations with practical architecture constraints offers a structured way to address industrial transferability issues. However, as a review without new derivations, simulations, or experimental benchmarks, the immediate significance is modest and hinges on subsequent validation of the framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the workflow using transient electrothermal modeling and the two scalar reduced metrics (effective diffusion depth, local areal energy density) can propagate calibrated thresholds and correctly separate stable optimization from latent damage rests on unshown assumptions; no derivations, calibration procedures, or validation against measurements are presented to support propagation across the full recipe space.
  2. [Predictive workflow] The proposed classification framework: The assumption that scalar reduced-state metrics retain sufficient information about microstructural evolution and current localization is load-bearing for the reliability classification. In fine-line or copper-stack geometries the manuscript itself identifies current localization and diffusion-barrier effects that create spatial gradients in temperature, stress, and species concentration; a single effective depth and areal energy density cannot encode these gradients, risking mis-labeling of phase segregation or stress-induced defects as stable conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is information-dense; clearer separation between the review of existing LECO literature and the novel elements of the proposed regime map would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the reduced state metrics could be defined more explicitly on first use to aid readers unfamiliar with the specific LECO literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript on laser-enhanced contact optimization. As this is a review article that synthesizes existing literature and outlines a conceptual framework rather than presenting new derivations, simulations, or experimental data, we have revised the text to clarify the scope, explicitly state assumptions, and temper claims about the workflow's capabilities. Below we address each major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the workflow using transient electrothermal modeling and the two scalar reduced metrics (effective diffusion depth, local areal energy density) can propagate calibrated thresholds and correctly separate stable optimization from latent damage rests on unshown assumptions; no derivations, calibration procedures, or validation against measurements are presented to support propagation across the full recipe space.

    Authors: We agree that the original abstract phrasing implied more than a conceptual proposal. The manuscript is a review and does not contain new derivations or validation data. We have revised the abstract to describe the workflow as a proposed conceptual approach that couples transient electrothermal modeling with reduced-state metrics to guide future calibration and validation, rather than asserting that it currently propagates thresholds or separates conditions across the recipe space. A new paragraph has been added in the discussion section to outline the key assumptions and the requirement for experimental benchmarks. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Predictive workflow] The proposed classification framework: The assumption that scalar reduced-state metrics retain sufficient information about microstructural evolution and current localization is load-bearing for the reliability classification. In fine-line or copper-stack geometries the manuscript itself identifies current localization and diffusion-barrier effects that create spatial gradients in temperature, stress, and species concentration; a single effective depth and areal energy density cannot encode these gradients, risking mis-labeling of phase segregation or stress-induced defects as stable conditions.

    Authors: This observation correctly identifies a limitation of the scalar metrics. The review already notes current localization and diffusion-barrier effects in fine-line and copper stacks. We have expanded the predictive workflow section to explicitly discuss when these reduced metrics are likely to be insufficient due to unresolved spatial gradients and to recommend full multiphysics simulations for such architectures to reduce the risk of misclassification. This addition delineates the framework's applicability range without altering the core conceptual proposal. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review outlines framework without derivation reducing to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper is a review that examines LECO as a coupled multiphysics process and outlines a predictive workflow coupling transient electrothermal modeling with reduced state metrics (effective diffusion depth, local areal energy density) to propagate calibrated thresholds. No original equations, derivations, or new fitted parameters are presented that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs. The regime map and reliability classification rest on prior LECO literature, which is standard for reviews and does not create a load-bearing self-citation chain or self-definitional loop within this text. The central claims remain independent of any circular reduction shown here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review relies on standard semiconductor physics assumptions about electrothermal coupling and diffusion kinetics; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract. The predictive workflow implicitly assumes that reduced state metrics capture the dominant failure modes across contact stacks.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Localized electrothermal activation produces microstructural evolution that directly determines device-level contact resistivity and recombination.
    Invoked in the description of LECO as a coupled multiphysics process linking activation to electrical signatures.
  • domain assumption Time-dependent drift provides a reliable classification of interface kinetic stability.
    Used to define the reliability classification in the proposed framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5773 in / 1371 out tokens · 28602 ms · 2026-05-19T17:55:49.118892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. Mack, K. Krieg, C. Teßmann, D. Ourinson, J.-I. Polzin, A. Wolf, Development of Boron Emitters for Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact Solar Cells with Current-Assisted Contact Formation, Solar RRL 9 (2025) 2400808

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Ullah, S

    H. Ullah, S. Czapp, S. Szultka, H. Tariq, U.B. Qasim, H. Imran, Crystalline silicon (c-Si)- based tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) solar cells: a review, Energies 16 (2023) 715

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Fellmeth, H

    T. Fellmeth, H. Höffler, S. Mack, E. Krassowski, K. Krieg, B. Kafle, J. Greulich, Laser- enhanced contact optimization on iTOPCon solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 30 (2022) 1393–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3598

    work page doi:10.1002/pip.3598 2022

  4. [4]

    Tepner, A

    S. Tepner, A. Lorenz, Printing technologies for silicon solar cell metallization: a comprehensive review, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 31 (2023) 557–590

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Y . Fan, S. Zou, Y . Zeng, L. Dai, Z. Wang, Z. Lu, H. Sun, X. Zhou, B. Liao, X. Su, Investigation of the Ag–Si Contact Characteristics of Boron Emitters for n-Tunnel Oxide- Passivated Contact Solar Cells Metallized by Laser-Assisted Current Injection Treatment, Solar RRL 8 (2024) 2400268. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202400268

    work page doi:10.1002/solr.202400268 2024

  6. [6]

    Lennon, J

    A. Lennon, J. Colwell, K.P. Rodbell, Challenges facing copper-plated metallisation for silicon photovoltaics: Insights from integrated circuit technology development, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 27 (2019) 67–97

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Wilson, M

    G.M. Wilson, M. Al-Jassim, W.K. Metzger, S.W. Glunz, P. Verlinden, G. Xiong, L.M. Mansfield, B.J. Stanbery, K. Zhu, Y . Yan, others, The 2020 photovoltaic technologies roadmap, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 53 (2020) 493001. Page 43 of 51 Donald Intal & Abasifreke U. Ebong: Preprint submitted to Elsevier

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Ballif, F.-J

    C. Ballif, F.-J. Haug, M. Boccard, P.J. Verlinden, G. Hahn, Status and perspectives of crystalline silicon photovoltaics in research and industry, Nature Reviews Materials 7 (2022) 597–616

    work page 2022

  9. [10]

    R. Zhou, Y . Li, Z. Zhang, W. Tan, Z. Chen, Y . Lin, F. Pan, Nano‐size Joule‐Heating to Achieve Low‐Ohmic Ag–Si Contact on Boron Emitters of n‐TOPCon Solar Cells, Small 21 (2025) 2409628. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202409628

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.202409628 2025

  10. [11]

    Y . Li, R. Zhou, M. Yu, Y . Tian, Y . Lin, F. Pan, Controllable Growth of Silver Crystallites on the Rear Ag–Si Contact Interface of TOPCon Solar Cells Through an Electrochemical Reduction Reaction Triggered by Laser-Enhanced Contact Optimization, Solar RRL 9 (2025) 2500233

    work page 2025

  11. [12]

    Q. Wang, K. Guo, S. Gu, W. Huang, W. Wu, J. Ding, Investigation on Effects of the Laser‐Enhanced Contact Optimization Process With Ag Paste in a Boron Emitter for n‐ TOPCon Solar Cell, Progress in Photovoltaics 33 (2025) 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3854

    work page doi:10.1002/pip.3854 2025

  12. [13]

    Z. Yang, M. Ernst, D. Kang, R. Basnet, K. Fong, P. Zheng, J. Yang, A. Liu, D. Macdonald, Simulation-Based Analysis of Silicon Solar Cell Performance with Laser Enhanced Contacts: Impact of Bulk Defect Density and Resistivity, Solar RRL 9 (2025) e202500465

    work page 2025

  13. [14]

    Bonilla, I

    R.S. Bonilla, I. Al-Dhahir, M. Yu, P. Hamer, P.P. Altermatt, Charge fluctuations at the Si–SiO2 interface and its effect on surface recombination in solar cells, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 215 (2020) 110649

    work page 2020

  14. [15]

    Xiong, T.O.A

    Y . Xiong, T.O.A. Fattah, K. Okamoto, R.S. Bonilla, A Failure Mode Affecting the Reliability of LECO-Treated High-Efficiency TOPCon Solar Cells, Solar RRL 9 (2025) 2500151

    work page 2025

  15. [16]

    Hacke, S

    P. Hacke, S. Spataru, B. Habersberger, Y . Chen, Field-representative evaluation of PID-polarization in TOPCon PV modules by accelerated stress testing, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 32 (2024) 346–355

    work page 2024

  16. [17]

    Z. Li, J. Tang, K. Yu, Q. Xiao, Q. Zhu, X. Li, Z. Ji, B. Huang, J. Huang, L. Wang, others, Effect of Firing Temperature on Damp Heat Stability of n-TOPCon Solar Cells’ Rear Side, Solar RRL 9 (2025) 2500299

    work page 2025

  17. [18]

    Z. Ding, C. Kan, S. Jiang, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, W. Liu, M. Liao, Z. Yang, P. Hang, Y . Zeng, others, Highly passivated TOPCon bottom cells for perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells, Nature Communications 15 (2024) 8453

    work page 2024

  18. [19]

    Rahman, J.A

    R.U. Rahman, J.A. Jony, Alamgeer, H. Yousuf, M.Q. Khokhar, M.N. Aida, M. Chu, A.S.A. Mohammed, S. Park, J. Yi, Frequency-Dependent Variation of LeTID Degradation and Recovery Using Low Intensity with Different AC Biasing in TOPCon Solar Cells, Journal of Electronic Materials 54 (2025) 7308–7320

    work page 2025

  19. [20]

    Chang, Y

    Y.-C. Chang, Y . Zhang, L. Wang, S. Wang, H. Wang, C.-Y . Huang, R. Chen, C. Chan, B. Hallam, Silver-lean metallization and hybrid contacts via plating on screen-printed metal for silicon solar cells manufacturing, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 33 (2025) 158–169

    work page 2025

  20. [21]

    Razzaq, T.G

    A. Razzaq, T.G. Allen, W. Liu, Z. Liu, S. De Wolf, Silicon heterojunction solar cells: Techno-economic assessment and opportunities, Joule 6 (2022) 514–542

    work page 2022

  21. [22]

    Ebong, D

    A. Ebong, D. Intal, S. Huneycutt, T. Druffel, R. Dharmadasa, K. Elmer, A. Nambo, Screen printable copper pastes for silicon solar cells, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 265 (2024) 112633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112633. Page 44 of 51 Donald Intal & Abasifreke U. Ebong: Preprint submitted to Elsevier

    work page doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112633 2024

  22. [23]

    Chen, J.W

    R. Zhong, V .S.A. Mulkaluri, K. Elmer, V . Upadhyaya, Y .W. Ok, R. Dharmadasa, E. Yenney, A. Nambo, T. Druffel, A. Rohatgi, High Efficiency Screen-Printed Ag-Free PERC Solar Cell With Cu Paste and Laser-Enhanced Contact Optimization, IEEE J. Photovoltaics 15 (2025) 984–987. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV .2025.3597679

    work page doi:10.1109/jphotov 2025

  23. [24]

    Korichi, A

    H. Korichi, A. Boucheham, A.B. Bensdira, M. Kazerane, Advancements in passivation and metallization techniques for n-type monocrystalline silicon solar cells, Solar Energy and Sustainable Development Journal 13 (2024) 151–173

    work page 2024

  24. [25]

    Basnet, D

    R. Basnet, D. Yan, D. Kang, M.M. Shehata, P. Phang, T. Truong, J. Bullock, H. Shen, D. Macdonald, Current status and challenges for hole-selective poly-silicon based passivating contacts, Applied Physics Reviews 11 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [26]

    Ruffino, M.G

    F. Ruffino, M.G. Grimaldi, Nanostructuration of thin metal films by pulsed laser irradiations: a review, Nanomaterials 9 (2019) 1133

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    B. Guo, J. Sun, Y . Hua, N. Zhan, J. Jia, K. Chu, Femtosecond laser micro/nano- manufacturing: theories, measurements, methods, and applications, Nanomanufacturing and Metrology 3 (2020) 26–67

    work page 2020

  27. [28]

    Pustovalov, Heating of nanoparticles and their environment by laser radiation and applications, Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering 7 (2024)

    V .K. Pustovalov, Heating of nanoparticles and their environment by laser radiation and applications, Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering 7 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [29]

    Al-Mahdy, H

    A. Al-Mahdy, H. Kotadia, M. Sharp, T. Opoz, J. Mullett, J. Ahuir-Torres, Effect of surface roughness on the surface texturing of 316 l stainless steel by nanosecond pulsed laser, Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing 10 (2023) 141–164

    work page 2023

  29. [30]

    J.H. Park, S. Pattipaka, G.-T. Hwang, M. Park, Y .M. Woo, Y .B. Kim, H.E. Lee, C.K. Jeong, T. Zhang, Y . Min, others, Light–material interactions using laser and flash sources for energy conversion and storage applications, Nano-Micro Letters 16 (2024) 276

    work page 2024

  30. [31]

    Fazio, B

    E. Fazio, B. Gökce, A. De Giacomo, M. Meneghetti, G. Compagnini, M. Tommasini, F. Waag, A. Lucotti, C.G. Zanchi, P.M. Ossi, others, Nanoparticles engineering by pulsed laser ablation in liquids: concepts and applications, Nanomaterials 10 (2020) 2317

    work page 2020

  31. [32]

    Fields, M.I

    J.D. Fields, M.I. Ahmad, V .L. Pool, J. Yu, D.G. Van Campen, P.A. Parilla, M.F. Toney, M.F. Van Hest, The formation mechanism for printed silver-contacts for silicon solar cells, Nature Communications 7 (2016) 11143

    work page 2016

  32. [33]

    J. Qin, W. Zhang, J. Yang, G. Du, X. Cai, Effect of Pb-Te-Si-O glasses on Ag thick- film contact in crystalline silicon solar cells, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2019: p. 042038

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    Lin, S.-P

    C.-H. Lin, S.-P. Hsu, W.-C. Hsu, Silicon Solar Cells: Structural Properties of Ag- Contacts/Si-Substrate, in: L.A. Kosyachenko (Ed.), Solar Cells - Silicon Wafer-Based Technologies, InTech, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/19687

    work page doi:10.5772/19687 2011

  34. [35]

    S. Chen, C. Guo, J. Feng, X. Zhang, R. An, Z. Liu, H. Du, Y . Gou, C. Xiao, W. Liu, others, Mitigating Passivation Layer Damage and Lowering Contact Resistivity of TOPcon Solar Cells Through Low PbO Content Ag Paste, Small Methods 9 (2025) 2401753

    work page 2025

  35. [36]

    Y . Li, R. Zhou, Z. Chen, Y . Li, X. Cheng, B. Zhang, J. Chen, Y . Lin, F. Pan, Insight into the Contact Mechanism of Ag/Al–Si Interface for the Front‐Side Metallization of TOPCon Silicon Solar Cells, Small Methods 9 (2025) 2400707. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202400707

    work page doi:10.1002/smtd.202400707 2025

  36. [37]

    gray finger

    H. Kim, S. Cho, H. Kim, D. Kim, M. Dovrat, G. Eytan, J. Huh, Electrochemical nature of contact firing reactions for screen‐printed silicon solar cells: origin of “gray finger” phenomenon, Progress in Photovoltaics 24 (2016) 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2783

    work page doi:10.1002/pip.2783 2016

  37. [38]

    Kim, S.-H

    H.-S. Kim, S.-H. Kim, S.-B. Cho, S.-H. Park, J.-Y . Huh, Attenuation of short-circuit effect along screen-printed silver gridlines during the contact firing process of crystalline Page 45 of 51 Donald Intal & Abasifreke U. Ebong: Preprint submitted to Elsevier silicon solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 30 (2022) 1433– 1445

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    Hörteis, J

    M. Hörteis, J. Benick, J. Nekarda, A. Richter, R. Preu, S. Glunz, Fundamental studies on the front contact formation resulting in a 21% efficiency silicon solar cell with printed rear and front contacts, in: 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, IEEE, 2010: pp. 000672–000677

    work page 2010

  39. [40]

    Birenis, Investigation of electronic and structural properties of silicon solar cell contacts, University of Oslo, MSc (2012)

    D. Birenis, Investigation of electronic and structural properties of silicon solar cell contacts, University of Oslo, MSc (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [41]

    X. Sun, S. Yao, J. Xing, J. Zhang, Y . Yang, H. Li, H. Tong, X. Yuan, Mechanism of silver/glass interaction in the metallization of crystalline silicon solar cells, Materials Research Express 7 (2020) 016315

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    Ibrahim, B

    M. Ibrahim, B. Parditka, A. Fuhrich, Z. Balogh, P. Stender, Z. Erdélyi, G. Schmitz, Growth kinetics and interface structure of copper silicides studied by atom probe tomography, Physica Status Solidi (c) 10 (2013) 1724–1727

    work page 2013

  42. [43]

    Ketov, Y .P

    S.V . Ketov, Y .P. Ivanov, B. Putz, Z. Zhang, J. Eckert, A. Greer, Atomic diffusivities in amorphous and liquid Cu-Zr: Kirkendall effects and dependence on packing density, Acta Materialia 214 (2021) 116993

    work page 2021

  43. [44]

    Chandrasekaran, Surface and interface diffusion processes in nanoscale thin films, (2022)

    A. Chandrasekaran, Surface and interface diffusion processes in nanoscale thin films, (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [45]

    D.L. Beke, Y . Kaganovskii, G. Katona, Interdiffusion along grain boundaries– Diffusion induced grain boundary migration, low temperature homogenization and reactions in nanostructured thin films, Progress in Materials Science 98 (2018) 625–674

    work page 2018

  45. [46]

    Mühlbacher, G

    M. Mühlbacher, G. Greczynski, B. Sartory, N. Schalk, J. Lu, I. Petrov, J.E. Greene, L. Hultman, C. Mitterer, Enhanced Ti0. 84Ta0. 16N diffusion barriers, grown by a hybrid sputtering technique with no substrate heating, between Si (001) wafers and Cu overlayers, Scientific Reports 8 (2018) 5360

    work page 2018

  46. [47]

    Sakhonenkov, A

    S.S. Sakhonenkov, A. Gaisin, A. Konashuk, A. Bugaev, R. Pleshkov, V . Polkovnikov, E. Filatova, Influence of silicon interlayers on transition layer formation in Ti/Ni multilayer structures of different thicknesses, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 207 (2025) 113003

    work page 2025

  47. [48]

    Mirigliano, F

    M. Mirigliano, F. Borghi, A. Podestà, A. Antidormi, L. Colombo, P. Milani, Non- ohmic behavior and resistive switching of Au cluster-assembled films beyond the percolation threshold, Nanoscale Advances 1 (2019) 3119–3130

    work page 2019

  48. [49]

    N.F. Zorn, J. Zaumseil, Charge transport in semiconducting carbon nanotube networks, Applied Physics Reviews 8 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [50]

    Gupta, A.K

    A.K. Gupta, A.K. Sen, Nonlinear dc response in composites: A percolative study, Physical Review B 57 (1998) 3375

    work page 1998

  50. [51]

    A.J. Webb, M. Szablewski, D. Bloor, D. Atkinson, A. Graham, P. Laughlin, D. Lussey, A multi-component nanocomposite screen-printed ink with non-linear touch sensitive electrical conductivity, Nanotechnology 24 (2013) 165501

    work page 2013

  51. [52]

    H.M. Tun, S. Keawmaungkom, S. Srimongkol, P. Kunnam, B. Chayasombat, P. Muthitamongkol, P. Wiroonpochit, K. Tapracharoen, P. Phadungbut, S. Srisawadi, others, Onion-Like Progressive Tunneling Model for Predicting Electrical Conductivity in Carbon Black-Filled Natural Rubber Composites, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 143 (2026) e58126

    work page 2026

  52. [53]

    Sarikhani, Z.S

    N. Sarikhani, Z.S. Arabshahi, A.A. Saberi, A.Z. Moshfegh, Unified modeling and experimental realization of electrical and thermal percolation in polymer composites, Applied Physics Reviews 9 (2022). Page 46 of 51 Donald Intal & Abasifreke U. Ebong: Preprint submitted to Elsevier

    work page 2022

  53. [54]

    Manning, F

    H.G. Manning, F. Niosi, C.G. da Rocha, A.T. Bellew, C. O’Callaghan, S. Biswas, P.F. Flowers, B.J. Wiley, J.D. Holmes, M.S. Ferreira, others, Emergence of winner-takes-all connectivity paths in random nanowire networks, Nature Communications 9 (2018) 3219

    work page 2018

  54. [55]

    Vecchio, M.D

    D.A. Vecchio, M.D. Hammig, X. Xiao, A. Saha, P. Bogdan, N.A. Kotov, Spanning network gels from nanoparticles and graph theoretical analysis of their structure and properties, Advanced Materials 34 (2022) 2201313

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    Janod, J

    E. Janod, J. Tranchant, B. Corraze, M. Querré, P. Stoliar, M. Rozenberg, T. Cren, D. Roditchev, V .T. Phuoc, M.-P. Besland, others, Resistive switching in Mott insulators and correlated systems, Advanced Functional Materials 25 (2015) 6287–6305

    work page 2015

  56. [57]

    Self-Organising Memristive Networks as Physical Learning Systems

    F. Caravelli, G. Milano, A.Z. Stieg, C. Ricciardi, S.A. Brown, Z. Kuncic, Self- organising memristive networks as physical learning systems, arXiv Preprint arXiv:2509.00747 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [58]

    H. Lin, G. Wang, Q. Su, C. Han, C. Xue, S. Yin, L. Fang, X. Xu, P. Gao, Unveiling the mechanism of attaining high fill factor in silicon solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 32 (2024) 359–371

    work page 2024

  58. [59]

    Aberle, S.J

    A.G. Aberle, S.J. Robinson, A. Wang, J. Zhao, S.R. Wenham, M.A. Green, High- efficiency silicon solar cells: Full factor limitations and non-ideal diode behaviour due to voltage-dependent rear surface recombination velocity, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 1 (1993) 133–143

    work page 1993

  59. [60]

    Weiss, O

    T.P. Weiss, O. Ramírez, S. Paetel, W. Witte, J. Nishinaga, T. Feurer, S. Siebentritt, Metastable defects decrease the fill factor of solar cells, Physical Review Applied 19 (2023) 024052

    work page 2023

  60. [61]

    Upadhyay, D

    S. Upadhyay, D. Singh, Effect of series and shunt resistance on the performance of kesterite solar cells, International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology 2 (2023) 38–45

    work page 2023

  61. [62]

    Terrón, A

    M. Terrón, A. Ĺuque, Reduction of the apparent shunt resistance effect in silicon concentrator solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2 (1994) 187–202

    work page 1994

  62. [63]

    A. Frey, J. Engelhardt, G. Micard, G. Hahn, B. Terheiden, Investigation of fill factor losses on 20.2% efficient n-type mono-like silicon solar cells with laser contact opening, Physica Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters 10 (2016) 143–147

    work page 2016

  63. [64]

    Zouhair, B

    S. Zouhair, B. Luo, D. Bogachuk, D. Martineau, L. Wagner, A. Chahboun, S.W. Glunz, A. Hinsch, Fill Factor Assessment in Hole Selective Layer Free Carbon Electrode- Based Perovskite Solar Cells with 15.5% Certified Power Conversion Efficiency, Solar RRL 6 (2022) 2100745

    work page 2022

  64. [65]

    Wang, R.C

    C. Wang, R.C. MacKenzie, U. Würfel, D. Neher, T. Kirchartz, C. Deibel, M. Saladina, Transport resistance dominates the fill factor losses in record organic solar cells, Advanced Energy Materials (2025) 2405889

    work page 2025

  65. [66]

    Fong, K.R

    K.C. Fong, K.R. McIntosh, A.W. Blakers, Accurate series resistance measurement of solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 21 (2013) 490–499

    work page 2013

  66. [67]

    Abbott, T

    M. Abbott, T. Trupke, H. Hartmann, R. Gupta, O. Breitenstein, Laser isolation of shunted regions in industrial solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 15 (2007) 613–620

    work page 2007

  67. [68]

    Mette, D

    A. Mette, D. Pysch, G. Emanuel, D. Erath, R. Preu, S.W. Glunz, Series resistance characterization of industrial silicon solar cells with screen-printed contacts using hotmelt paste, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 15 (2007) 493–505

    work page 2007

  68. [69]

    Micard, D

    G. Micard, D. Sommer, G. Hahn, B. Terheiden, Extraction of individual components of series resistance using TCAD simulations meeting the requirements of 2-and 3- dimensional carrier flow of IBC solar cells, Energy Procedia 124 (2017) 113–119. Page 47 of 51 Donald Intal & Abasifreke U. Ebong: Preprint submitted to Elsevier

    work page 2017

  69. [70]

    Wang, A.B

    E.-C. Wang, A.B. Morales-Vilches, S. Neubert, A. Cruz, R. Schlatmann, B. Stannowski, A simple method with analytical model to extract heterojunction solar cell series resistance components and to extract the A-Si: H (i/p) to transparent conductive oxide contact resistivity, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 2019: p. 040022

    work page 2019

  70. [71]

    Granek, M

    F. Granek, M. Hermle, D.M. Huljić, O. Schultz-Wittmann, S.W. Glunz, Enhanced lateral current transport via the front N+ diffused layer of n-type high-efficiency back- junction back-contact silicon solar cells, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 17 (2009) 47–56

    work page 2009

  71. [72]

    Leilaeioun, W

    M. Leilaeioun, W. Weigand, M. Boccard, Z.J. Yu, K. Fisher, Z.C. Holman, Contact resistivity of the p-type amorphous silicon hole contact in silicon heterojunction solar cells, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 10 (2019) 54–62

    work page 2019

  72. [73]

    Q. Wang, K. Guo, S. Gu, W. Wu, L. Li, D.E. Erişen, G. Yong, J. Ding, Impact of laser- enhanced contact optimization on n-TOPCon solar cells’ performance and efficiency: Experimental and simulated insights, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 285 (2025) 113526

    work page 2025

  73. [74]

    Grabowski, Z

    D. Grabowski, Z. Liu, G. Schöpe, U. Rau, T. Kirchartz, Fill factor losses and deviations from the superposition principle in lead halide perovskite solar cells, Solar Rrl 6 (2022) 2200507

    work page 2022

  74. [75]

    Huster, S

    F. Huster, S. Seren, G. Schubert, M. Kaes, G. Hahn, O. Breitenstein, P. Altermatt, Shunts in silicon solar cells below screen-printed silver contacts, (2004)

    work page 2004

  75. [76]

    Höffler, T

    H. Höffler, T. Fellmeth, F. Maischner, J. Greulich, E. Krassowski, A. Henning, Enlarged firing window and efficiency boosting of PERC solar cells by ‘laser enhanced contact optimization’(LECO), in: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 2022: p. 110001

    work page 2022

  76. [77]

    De Rose, D

    A. De Rose, D. Erath, V . Nikitina, J. Schube, D. Güldali, Ä. Minat, T. Rößler, A. Richter, S. Kirner, A. Kraft, others, Low-temperature metallization & interconnection for silicon heterojunction and perovskite silicon tandem solar cells, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 261 (2023) 112515

    work page 2023

  77. [78]

    Aydin, T.G

    E. Aydin, T.G. Allen, M. De Bastiani, A. Razzaq, L. Xu, E. Ugur, J. Liu, S. De Wolf, Pathways toward commercial perovskite/silicon tandem photovoltaics, Science 383 (2024) eadh3849

    work page 2024

  78. [79]

    Kabaklı, J

    Ö.Ş. Kabaklı, J. Kox, L. Tutsch, M. Heydarian, A.J. Bett, S. Lange, O. Fischer, C. Hagendorf, M. Bivour, M. Hermle, others, Minimizing electro-optical losses of ITO layers for monolithic perovskite silicon tandem solar cells, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 254 (2023) 112246

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    Miah, M.B

    M.H. Miah, M.B. Rahman, M. Nur-E-Alam, M.A. Islam, M. Shahinuzzaman, M.R. Rahman, M.H. Ullah, M.U. Khandaker, Key degradation mechanisms of perovskite solar cells and strategies for enhanced stability: issues and prospects, RSC Advances 15 (2025) 628–654

    work page 2025

  80. [81]

    Hartenstein, W

    M.B. Hartenstein, W. Nemeth, D.L. Young, P. Stradins, S. Agarwal, Hydrogen Stability and Bonding in SiN x and Al2O3 Dielectric Stacks on Poly-Si/SiO x Passivating Contacts, ACS Applied Energy Materials 6 (2023) 7230–7239

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.