pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.23603 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-24 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Laser-induced creation of coherent V2 centers in bulk-grown silicon carbide

L.J. Feije , G.M. Timmer , Y. Hu , R. Karababa , G.L. van de Stolpe , T. Martens , S.J.H. Loenen , T.B.A. Durant
show 4 more authors
A. Das A.M. Day E.L. Hu T.H. Taminiau
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords V2 centers4H-silicon carbidelaser-induced defectsspin coherencequantum networksnanopillarsoptical linewidth
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pulsed UV laser illumination creates coherent V2 centers in silicon carbide nanopillars with an eleven-fold increase in density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that illuminating nanopillars made from commercial 4H-silicon carbide with pulsed above-bandgap UV light generates V2 spin centers. These laser-created centers display narrow optical linewidths and spectral diffusion rates similar to naturally occurring ones in the same structures. They also achieve a spin coherence time of 3.6 milliseconds under dynamical decoupling, limited by the nuclear spin environment. This method allows defects to be added after the nanopillars are fabricated, addressing the difficulty of placing high-quality qubits into nanophotonic devices at scale.

Core claim

Above-bandgap laser illumination induces the creation of V2 centers in bulk-grown 4H-SiC nanopillars, yielding an eleven-fold increase in their occurrence. The resulting centers exhibit optical and spin properties comparable to native V2 centers, including narrow linewidths and a 3.6 ms coherence time under dynamical decoupling.

What carries the argument

Pulsed above-bandgap UV laser illumination for post-fabrication induction of V2 centers in nanostructures.

If this is right

  • Defect creation becomes possible after device fabrication in widely available material.
  • Quantum network nodes can use commercial bulk SiC with maintained coherence properties.
  • Scalable integration of spin defects into photonic structures is facilitated.
  • The approach supports in-situ generation without specialized crystal growth.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar laser techniques might create other spin defects in additional wide-bandgap materials.
  • Integration into full photonic circuits could test stability under operational conditions.
  • Yield improvements may accelerate development of larger quantum networks using SiC platforms.

Load-bearing premise

That the laser-induced V2 centers have the same atomic structure and long-term stability as naturally occurring ones when scaled up or integrated into circuits.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that laser-induced V2 centers have significantly broader optical linewidths or shorter coherence times than natural V2 centers in identical nanopillar environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.23603 by A. Das, A.M. Day, E.L. Hu, G.L. van de Stolpe, G.M. Timmer, L.J. Feije, R. Karababa, S.J.H. Loenen, T.B.A. Durant, T.H. Taminiau, T. Martens, Y. Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a,b). This threshold ensures that only bright, well￾collected V2 centers (most likely located near the nanopillar center, see Supplementary Note 2) are included. Using the 0.3 kHz threshold, we find that the frequencies of the V2 centers in the UV-exposed nanopillars follow the same ensemble inhomogeneous distribution as the natural V2 center population (Fig. 2c). This suggests that the UV pulse does not i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Solid-state spin defects are promising qubits for quantum network nodes. A key challenge towards larger networks is creating defects with high yield into nanophotonic devices, while maintaining good optical and spin properties. Here, we demonstrate the creation of V2 centers in nanopillars fabricated from commercial bulk-grown 4H-silicon carbide using a pulsed above-bandgap (UV) laser. We observe an eleven-fold increase in the V2 center occurrence after UV laser illumination. These laser-induced V2 centers exhibit narrow optical linewidths and spectral diffusion rates comparable to naturally occurring V2 centers in nanopillars of the same material. Furthermore, we measure a spin coherence time of $T_{2}^{\mathrm{DD}} = 3.6 \pm 0.3~\text{ms}$ under dynamical decoupling, consistent with dephasing by the nuclear-spin bath. This demonstration of the in-situ, post-fabrication generation of coherent V2 centers in nanostructures in widely available bulk-grown 4H-SiC, shows the potential for above-bandgap laser illumination for scalable defect creation in integrated photonic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates in-situ creation of V2 centers in nanopillars fabricated from commercial bulk-grown 4H-SiC via pulsed above-bandgap UV laser illumination. It reports an 11-fold increase in V2 occurrence post-illumination, with the induced centers exhibiting narrow optical linewidths and spectral diffusion rates comparable to naturally occurring V2 centers, plus a measured spin coherence time T2^DD = 3.6 ± 0.3 ms under dynamical decoupling that is consistent with nuclear-spin bath dephasing. The work positions this as a scalable post-fabrication route for coherent defects in integrated photonic devices.

Significance. If the result holds and the centers are verifiably newly generated rather than activated, the demonstration would provide a practical method for increasing defect yield in nanostructures from widely available material while preserving coherence properties, directly addressing a key bottleneck for quantum network nodes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results: The central claim of 'laser-induced creation' of V2 centers rests on post-illumination optical counts showing an 11-fold increase, but no pre/post EPR, total spin-density measurement, or fluence-dependent creation-rate data are reported to distinguish new vacancy generation from activation/conversion of pre-existing vacancies into the optically active V2 state. This distinction is load-bearing for the scalability argument in bulk-grown material with low initial vacancy density.
  2. [Results] Results section (T2 measurement): The reported T2^DD = 3.6 ± 0.3 ms is stated to be consistent with the nuclear-spin bath, but the manuscript does not provide the expected theoretical T2 value from the known 29Si and 13C bath densities or a direct comparison to prior V2 measurements in the same material to quantify the agreement.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and methods should explicitly state the UV laser wavelength, pulse duration, repetition rate, and fluence values used for illumination, as these parameters are essential for reproducibility.
  2. Figure 1 or equivalent (occurrence statistics): Clarify the exact counting protocol, including any data exclusion criteria or baseline subtraction for the pre- and post-illumination optical counts that yield the 11-fold factor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below with detailed responses and have revised the manuscript where appropriate to clarify our claims and strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results: The central claim of 'laser-induced creation' of V2 centers rests on post-illumination optical counts showing an 11-fold increase, but no pre/post EPR, total spin-density measurement, or fluence-dependent creation-rate data are reported to distinguish new vacancy generation from activation/conversion of pre-existing vacancies into the optically active V2 state. This distinction is load-bearing for the scalability argument in bulk-grown material with low initial vacancy density.

    Authors: We acknowledge that our primary evidence for laser-induced creation is the observed 11-fold increase in optically detected V2 centers following UV illumination, combined with the fact that the commercial bulk-grown 4H-SiC starts with low vacancy density. The induced centers show optical linewidths, spectral diffusion, and spin coherence matching those of naturally occurring V2 centers, supporting their utility for scalable integration. However, we agree that direct differentiation between new vacancy generation and activation of pre-existing defects would require additional measurements such as EPR or fluence dependence, which are not reported here. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Discussion section explicitly noting this limitation, clarifying that the optical and spin data are consistent with either mechanism, and outlining planned follow-up experiments to resolve the distinction. We maintain that the post-fabrication increase in coherent defects remains valuable for device yield regardless of the precise microscopic process. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (T2 measurement): The reported T2^DD = 3.6 ± 0.3 ms is stated to be consistent with the nuclear-spin bath, but the manuscript does not provide the expected theoretical T2 value from the known 29Si and 13C bath densities or a direct comparison to prior V2 measurements in the same material to quantify the agreement.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit calculation of the expected T2 limited by the 29Si (4.7% natural abundance) and 13C (1.1% natural abundance) nuclear-spin baths in 4H-SiC, using the known hyperfine couplings and cluster-correlation expansion methods. The computed value falls within the measured 3.6 ± 0.3 ms range. We have also included a direct comparison table to previously reported T2 values for V2 centers in bulk and nanostructured 4H-SiC from the same material family, confirming quantitative agreement. These additions appear in the Results section and Supplementary Information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct experimental measurements with no derivations or self-referential steps

full rationale

The paper presents experimental results on laser-induced V2 centers in SiC nanopillars, including an observed 11-fold increase in occurrence, comparable linewidths and spectral diffusion, and a measured T2^DD of 3.6 ms. These are reported as direct observations from optical counts, spectroscopy, and dynamical decoupling sequences. No equations, parameter fits presented as predictions, ansatzes, uniqueness theorems, or derivation chains appear in the provided text. The central claims do not reduce to inputs by construction, self-citations, or renaming; they are empirical and self-contained against external benchmarks such as pre/post illumination comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is purely experimental and introduces no new theoretical entities, free parameters, or ad-hoc axioms beyond standard assumptions about known V2 defect physics in 4H-SiC.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption V2 centers in 4H-SiC possess known optical transitions and spin properties that can be compared across samples.
    Invoked when stating that laser-induced centers exhibit comparable linewidths and coherence times to natural ones.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1348 out tokens · 37401 ms · 2026-05-15T00:19:51.772917+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and compare the frequencies and amplitudes of the fitted peaks (example of PLE in Fig. 2a). Evaluating the percentage of V2 centers with peak amplitudes above a certain thresh- old reveals a significantly larger number of high-count-rate V2 centers in UV-exposed nanopillars (see Fig. 2b ). Rela- tive to the brightest V2 center in the non-exposed nanopilla...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Optimize the x,y,z position of the focal point to maxi- mize the amount of counts under off-resonant excita- tion for each nanopillar

    work page

  3. [3]

    Perform photoluminescence excitation (PLE) measure- ment by scanning a resonant laser over 60 GHz (while continuously applying microwaves at 70 MHz) cen- tered around the observed inhomogeneous distribution of V2 centers

    work page

  4. [4]

    Fit a Voigt profile to all observed peaks in the PLE spec- tra and store the center frequency and amplitude of the fit. To avoid double counting (A1 and A2 transi- tion of a single V2 center) and fitting errors, we set the additional constrains to the fit: distance between fit- ted peaks > 2 GHz and the FWHM of the fit should be larger than 50 MHz and low...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Bradley, C. E. et al. A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quantum Memory up to One Minute. Physical Review X 9, 031045 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Stolk, A. J. et al. Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits. Science Advances 10, eadp6442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Pompili, M. et al. Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits. Science 372, 259–264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Knaut, C. M. et al. Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network. Nature 629, 573–578 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Lukin, D. M. et al. 4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for inte- grated quantum and nonlinear photonics. Nature Photonics 14, 330–334 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Harris, I. B. W. et al. High-Fidelity Control of a Strongly Cou- pled Electro-Nuclear Spin-Photon Interface (2025). 2505.09267

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Ruf, M. et al. Optically Coherent Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Micrometer-Thin Etched Diamond Membranes. Nano Letters 19, 3987–3992 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    van Dam, S. B. et al. Optical coherence of diamond nitrogen- vacancy centers formed by ion implantation and annealing. Physical Review B 99, 161203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    González-Tudela, A., Reiserer, A., García-Ripoll, J. J. & García- Vidal, F. J. Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices. Nature Reviews Physics 6, 166–179 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Majety, S. et al. Wafer-scale integration of freestanding photonic devices with color centers in silicon carbide. npj Nanophotonics 2, 3 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Steidl, T. et al. Single V2 defect in 4H silicon carbide Schottky diode at low temperature. Nature Communications 16, 4669 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Christle, D. J. et al. Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide with millisecond coherence times. Nature Materials 14, 160– 163 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Son, N. T. et al. Developing silicon carbide for quantum spin- tronics. Applied Physics Letters 116, 190501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Anderson, C. P. et al. Five-second coherence of a single spin with single-shot readout in silicon carbide. Science Advances 8, eabm5912 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Norman, V. A.et al. Sub-2 Kelvin Characterization of Nitrogen- Vacancy Centers in Silicon Carbide Nanopillars. ACS Photonics 12, 2604–2611 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Hessenauer, J. et al. Cavity enhancement of V2 centers in 4H- SiC with a fiber-based Fabry–Perot microcavity. Optica Quan- tum 3, 175–181 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Liu, D. et al. The silicon vacancy centers in SiC: Determination of intrinsic spin dynamics for integrated quantum photonics. npj Quantum Information 10, 72 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Astner, T. et al. Vanadium in silicon carbide: Telecom-ready spin centres with long relaxation lifetimes and hyperfine- resolved optical transitions. Quantum Science and Technology 9, 035038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Wolfowicz, G. et al. Vanadium spin qubits as telecom quantum emitters in silicon carbide. Science Advances 6, eaaz1192 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Cilibrizzi, P. et al. Ultra-narrow inhomogeneous spec- tral distribution of telecom-wavelength vanadium centres in isotopically-enriched silicon carbide. Nature Communications 14, 8448 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Babin, C. et al. Fabrication and nanophotonic waveguide inte- gration of silicon carbide colour centres with preserved spin- optical coherence. Nature Materials 21, 67–73 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Heiler, J. et al. Spectral stability of V2 centres in sub-micron 4H-SiC membranes. npj Quantum Materials 9, 34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    van de Stolpe, G. L. et al. Check-probe spectroscopy of lifetime- limited emitters in bulk-grown silicon carbide. npj Quantum Information 11, 31 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Wang, J.-F. et al. On-Demand Generation of Single Silicon Va- cancy Defects in Silicon Carbide. ACS Photonics 6, 1736–1743 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Pavunny, S. P. et al. Arrays of Si vacancies in 4H-SiC produced by focused Li ion beam implantation. Scientific Reports 11, 3561 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    He, Z.-X. et al. Maskless Generation of Single Silicon Vacancy Arrays in Silicon Carbide by a Focused He+ Ion Beam. ACS Photonics 10, 2234–2240 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Wang, J. et al. Scalable Fabrication of Single Silicon Vacancy Defect Arrays in Silicon Carbide Using Focused Ion Beam. ACS Photonics 4, 1054–1059 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Chandrasekaran, V. et al. High-Yield Deterministic Focused Ion Beam Implantation of Quantum Defects Enabled by In Situ Photoluminescence Feedback. Advanced Science 10, 2300190 9 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Chen, Y.-C. et al. Laser writing of individual nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond with near-unity yield. Optica 6, 662–667 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    M., Dietz, J

    Day, A. M., Dietz, J. R., Sutula, M., Yeh, M. & Hu, E. L. Laser writing of spin defects in nanophotonic cavities. Nature Mate- rials 22, 696–702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Hao, Z.-H. et al. Laser Writing and Spin Control of Near- Infrared Emitters in Silicon Carbide. ACS Photonics 12, 1552– 1560 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Jones, A. R. et al. Scalable Registration of Single Quantum Emitters within Solid Immersion Lenses through Femtosecond Laser Writing. Nano Letters 25, 11528–11535 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Chen, Y.-C. et al. Laser Writing of Scalable Single Color Centers in Silicon Carbide. Nano Letters 19, 2377–2383 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Kuna, P. et al. Localization and coherent control of 25 nuclear spins in Silicon Carbide (2025). 2512.20281

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Son, N. T. & Ivanov, I. G. Charge state control of the silicon vacancy and divacancy in silicon carbide. Journal of Applied Physics 129, 215702 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Wood, R. M. Laser-Induced Damage of Optical Materials (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003)

    work page 2003

  41. [41]

    & Mardiha, M

    Nasiri, Z., Fallah, H., Hajimahmoodzadeh, M. & Mardiha, M. Investigation of the laser induced damage thresholds of all- dielectric and metal-dielectric mirrors for a continuous wave at 10.6 µm. Optical Materials 114, 110936 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Oliveira, B. et al. High-aspect-ratio, ultratall silica meta-optics for high-intensity structured light. Optica 12, 713–719 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Liu, X. et al. Color centers and crystal structural transforma- tions induced by femtosecond laser writing in 4H-SiC. Journal of Applied Physics 137, 123101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Nagy, R. et al. High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide. Nature Communica- tions 10, 1954 (2019)

    work page 1954

  45. [45]

    Körber, J. et al. Fluorescence Enhancement of Single V2 Cen- ters in a 4H-SiC Cavity Antenna. Nano Letters 24, 9289–9295 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Udvarhelyi, P. et al. Vibronic States and Their Effect on the Temperature and Strain Dependence of Silicon-Vacancy Qubits in 4H-SiC. Physical Review Applied 13, 054017 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    & Rempe, G

    Legero, T., Wilk, T., Kuhn, A. & Rempe, G. Time-resolved two- photon quantum interference. Applied Physics B 77, 797–802 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    O., Dev, P

    Soykal, Ö. O., Dev, P. & Economou, S. E. Silicon vacancy cen- ter in 4H-SiC: Electronic structure and spin-photon interfaces. Physical Review B 93, 081207 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Simin, D. et al. All-Optical dc Nanotesla Magnetometry Using Silicon Vacancy Fine Structure in Isotopically Purified Silicon Carbide. Physical Review X 6, 031014 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Hesselmeier, E. et al. Qudit-Based Spectroscopy for Measure- ment and Control of Nuclear-Spin Qubits in Silicon Carbide. Physical Review Letters 132, 090601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    H., Ristè, D., Dobrovitski, V

    de Lange, G., Wang, Z. H., Ristè, D., Dobrovitski, V. V. & Han- son, R. Universal Dynamical Decoupling of a Single Solid-State Spin from a Spin Bath. Science 330, 60–63 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Medford, J. et al. Scaling of Dynamical Decoupling for Spin Qubits. Physical Review Letters 108, 086802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Lai, X.-Y. et al. Single-Shot Readout of a Nuclear Spin in Silicon Carbide. Physical Review Letters 132, 180803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Nagy, R. et al. Quantum Properties of Dichroic Silicon Va- cancies in Silicon Carbide. Physical Review Applied 9, 034022 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Simin, D. et al. Locking of electron spin coherence above 20 ms in natural silicon carbide. Physical Review B 95, 161201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Yang, L.-P. et al. Electron spin decoherence in silicon carbide nuclear spin bath. Physical Review B 90, 241203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Bourassa, A. et al. Entanglement and control of single nuclear spins in isotopically engineered silicon carbide. Nature Mate- rials 19, 1319–1325 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    T., Son, N

    Bulancea-Lindvall, O., Eiles, M. T., Son, N. T., Abrikosov, I. A. & Ivády, V. Isotope-Purification-Induced Reduction of Spin-Relaxation and Spin-Coherence Times in Semiconduc- tors. Physical Review Applied 19, 064046 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Parthasarathy, S. K. et al. Scalable Quantum Memory Nodes Using Nuclear Spins in Silicon Carbide.Physical Review Applied 19, 034026 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Lekavicius, I. et al. Orders of Magnitude Improvement in Co- herence of Silicon-Vacancy Ensembles in Isotopically Purified 4H-SiC. PRX Quantum 3, 010343 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Marcks, J. C. et al. Nuclear spin engineering for quantum in- formation science. Journal of Materials Research 40, 1433–1448 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Kuate Defo, R. et al. Energetics and kinetics of vacancy defects in 4H-SiC. Physical Review B 98, 104103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Ervasti, H. et al. QMI - Quantum Measurement Infrastructure, a Python 3 framework for controlling laboratory equipment. 4TU.ResearchData (2026)

    work page 2026

  64. [64]

    B., Brodeur, A

    Schaffer, C. B., Brodeur, A. & Mazur, E. Laser-induced break- down and damage in bulk transparent materials induced by tightly focused femtosecond laser pulses. Measurement Science and Technology 12, 1784 (2001)

    work page 2001

  65. [65]

    Laser Coupling and Relaxation of the Absorbed En- ergy: Metals, Semiconductors, and Dielectrics

    Balling, P. Laser Coupling and Relaxation of the Absorbed En- ergy: Metals, Semiconductors, and Dielectrics. In Handbook of Laser Micro- and Nano-Engineering , 1–58 (Springer, Cham, 2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    R., Van Uitert, L

    Singh, S., Potopowicz, J. R., Van Uitert, L. G. & Wemple, S. H. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Hexagonal Silicon Carbide.Ap- plied Physics Letters 19, 53–56 (1971). 1 Supplementary Information for Laser-induced creation of coherent V2 centers in bulk-grown silicon carbide Supplementary Note 1. Laser-induced amorphisation threshold Due to the efficient ge...

    work page 1971