Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 90 references

An unfitted finite-element scheme for Darcy flow keeps exact local mass conservation even when cut cells are arbitrarily small.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 17:41 UTC pith:3ID3TCS6

load-bearing objection Package mismatch: abstract is unfitted H(div) Darcy FEM, full text is an unrelated soft X-ray transient paper; claims cannot be checked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.26212 v2 pith:3ID3TCS6 submitted 2026-03-27 math.NA cs.NA

Divergence-free unfitted finite element discretisations for the Darcy problem

Santiago Badia , Anne Boschman , Alberto F. Mart\'in , Erik Nilsson , Ricardo Ruiz-Baier , Sara Zahedi This is my paper
classification math.NA cs.NA MSC 65N3065N1276S05
keywords unfitted finite elementsDarcy problemH(div)-conforming methodsghost penaltymass conservationcut cellspressure-robustnessaugmented Lagrangian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Darcy flow is the standard model for pressure-driven fluid motion through porous media. When the domain geometry is complicated, it is convenient to use an unfitted mesh that does not match the physical boundary; the price is that some mesh cells can be cut into tiny fragments that usually destroy stability or conservation. This paper constructs a compatible finite-element method that uses H(div)-conforming fluxes and discontinuous pressures, then adds two carefully chosen stabilisations (an L2 flux term and a mixed-term ghost penalty) so that the discrete mass-balance equation remains exact cell by cell. The same construction yields stability and optimal error estimates whose constants do not depend on how the mesh cuts the domain, and it remains pressure-robust when only pressure boundary conditions are imposed. An augmented-Lagrangian variant further improves constraint control and opens the door to efficient preconditioners. In short, the method lets practitioners keep both geometric flexibility and exact local conservation without having to remesh or accept cut-dependent conditioning.

Core claim

An unfitted compatible discretisation of the Darcy problem, based on H(div)-conforming flux spaces and discontinuous pressure spaces, can be stabilised by a combination of L2 flux stabilisation and a mixed-term ghost penalty so that pointwise discrete mass conservation is preserved while all stability and a-priori error constants remain independent of the cut configuration.

What carries the argument

The mixed-term ghost-penalty stabilisation (realised either cell-wise or face-based) that restores pressure control without destroying the local conservation structure of the H(div)-discontinuous-pressure pair.

Load-bearing premise

That the two stabilisation terms can be scaled so they simultaneously restore pressure control and leave the local conservation structure intact for every possible cut configuration.

What would settle it

A single numerical experiment on a sequence of meshes that produce arbitrarily small cut cells, with pure pressure boundary data, in which either the discrete mass residual fails to reach solver tolerance or the flux error constant grows unboundedly as the cut size tends to zero.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Unfitted meshes can be used for Darcy-type porous-media problems without sacrificing cell-wise mass conservation.
  • Conditioning and error constants remain cut-independent, so adaptive or immersed-boundary geometries become practical.
  • Pressure-robust flux estimates hold under pure pressure boundary conditions, improving accuracy for velocity-driven quantities of interest.
  • The augmented-Lagrangian variant supplies a well-conditioned algebraic system that admits efficient preconditioning strategies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mixed-term stabilisation idea may transfer to other mixed formulations (Stokes, Brinkman, poroelasticity) that require both H(div) conformity and cut robustness.
  • Because mass conservation is preserved up to solver tolerance, the scheme is a natural candidate for multiphase or transport problems that couple tightly to the Darcy velocity.
  • Face-based versus bulk ghost-penalty realisations give implementers a practical trade-off between sparsity and ease of assembly that can be tuned per application.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2603.26212 claims an unfitted compatible finite-element scheme for the Darcy problem that uses H(div)-conforming fluxes and discontinuous pressures, preserves pointwise discrete mass conservation on arbitrarily small cut cells, and obtains cut-independent stability and a priori error estimates via an L2 flux stabilisation combined with a mixed-term (bulk or face-based ghost-penalty) stabilisation. Mixed boundary conditions are weakly imposed, pressure-robust flux bounds are asserted for pure pressure BCs, and an augmented-Lagrangian variant is proposed for better constraint control and preconditioning. The numerical claims include optimal rates, cut-independent conditioning and mass conservation up to solver tolerance. The full manuscript text supplied for review, however, is an unrelated astrophysics article on a soft X-ray dirty fireball (arXiv-style 2603.26213); none of the stated proofs, lemmas, cut-configuration analysis or Darcy numerics appear.

Significance. If the abstract claims were substantiated by a correct analysis and supporting experiments, the work would be a useful contribution to unfitted mixed methods for porous-media flow: cut-robust, locally conservative H(div)–L2 schemes with pressure-robust flux estimates remain of practical interest for complex geometries. The combination of L2 flux stabilisation with a mixed-term ghost penalty that is claimed not to destroy local conservation, together with an AL variant amenable to preconditioning, would be a concrete technical advance. Because the supplied full text contains none of that material, the significance of the actual submission cannot be assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. The review package is misassembled: the abstract and paper_id describe an unfitted H(div)–discontinuous Darcy FEM (arXiv:2603.26212), yet the full manuscript text is an astrophysics paper on an energetic dirty fireball detected in soft X-rays. Consequently every load-bearing claim—pointwise discrete mass conservation under the proposed stabilisations, cut-independent stability and a priori constants, pressure-robust flux bounds for pure pressure BCs, and the AL variant—cannot be verified. A correct manuscript matching the abstract must be supplied before any scientific evaluation is possible.
  2. Even from the abstract alone, the central technical assertion (that L2 flux stabilisation plus the mixed-term bulk/face ghost-penalty restores pressure control for every cut configuration without destroying local conservation) is parameter-dependent and typically requires careful scaling of the free stabilisation coefficients. Without the proofs, parameter ranges, or cut-configuration experiments that the abstract promises, this claim remains uncheckable and is therefore a blocker for acceptance.
minor comments (2)
  1. Once a correct manuscript is submitted, the free parameters listed in the abstract (L2 flux coefficient, mixed-term/ghost-penalty parameters for bulk and face realisations, AL penalty) should be stated with their admissible ranges and scaling with mesh size and cut fraction.
  2. The abstract mentions both bulk and face-based ghost-penalty realisations; the eventual paper should make clear which (if either) is preferred for conditioning and for the pressure-robust flux estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detectable: abstract describes a standard FEM analysis paper; supplied full text is an unrelated astrophysics manuscript, so no derivation chain exists to reduce.

full rationale

The abstract of arXiv:2603.26212 claims an unfitted H(div)–discontinuous Darcy scheme that preserves pointwise discrete mass conservation, is robust to small cut cells via L2 flux plus mixed-term (bulk or face) ghost-penalty stabilisation, admits cut-independent stability and a priori estimates, and yields pressure-robust flux bounds under pure pressure BCs, plus an augmented-Lagrangian variant. These are ordinary numerical-analysis claims of the form ‘scheme X is stable/convergent under assumptions Y’; they do not recycle fitted parameters as predictions, invoke self-citation uniqueness theorems, or rename known empirical patterns. The CACHEABLE full-text block, however, is an entirely different paper (soft X-ray dirty fireball, arXiv-style 2603.26213). Consequently no equations, proofs, or self-citations from the Darcy FEM work are available to inspect. With no derivation chain present, no circular reduction can be exhibited. Score 0 is therefore the only honest outcome under the hard rules (no speculation, quote-required evidence only).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review is abstract-only because the full text in the package is a different paper. Ledger entries are those the abstract necessarily relies on: the continuous Darcy model, unfitted-mesh geometry, discrete de Rham / H(div)–L² structure, and ghost-penalty-type stabilisation as a robustness device. Stabilisation and AL parameters are free parameters typical of this literature.

free parameters (3)
  • L2 flux stabilisation coefficient
    Abstract states robustness is achieved by combining an L²-stabilisation of the flux with mixed-term stabilisation; such coefficients are almost always user-chosen or scaled with mesh size and must be large enough for stability.
  • mixed-term / ghost-penalty stabilisation parameters (bulk and face-based)
    Both cell-wise and face-based ghost-penalty realisations are mentioned; their scaling with cut size and polynomial degree is a free design choice that the theory constants depend on.
  • augmented Lagrangian penalty parameter
    An AL variant is introduced to improve control of the conservation constraint and preconditioning; the penalty strength is a free parameter.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Continuous Darcy problem (flux in H(div), pressure in L², constitutive law relating flux to pressure gradient and permeability) is well-posed under standard mixed boundary conditions.
    The whole discretisation targets this model; well-posedness is taken from classical mixed theory.
  • domain assumption Unfitted meshes may produce arbitrarily small cut cells; analysis must be independent of cut configuration.
    Stated as the robustness goal in the abstract; standard CutFEM setting.
  • standard math H(div)-conforming flux spaces paired with discontinuous pressure spaces yield a discrete complex that supports pointwise (cell-wise) mass conservation when the divergence of the flux space lands in the pressure space.
    Compatible / finite-element exterior-calculus structure assumed throughout the abstract.
  • domain assumption Ghost-penalty / bulk stabilisation can control jumps or gradients across cut faces without destroying consistency at the optimal rate.
    Both bulk and face-based realisations are invoked as the robustness mechanism.
  • ad hoc to paper Weak imposition of flux and pressure traces on unfitted boundaries is consistent and stable when combined with the interior stabilisations.
    Abstract asserts mixed BCs are handled this way; the precise Nitsche/penalty form is part of the paper’s construction.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 13938 in / 2923 out tokens · 53343 ms · 2026-07-13T17:41:22.673296+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop an unfitted compatible finite element discretisation for the Darcy problem based on $H(\mathrm{div})$-conforming flux spaces and discontinuous pressure spaces. The method is designed to preserve pointwise discrete mass conservation while remaining robust in the presence of arbitrarily small cut cells arising from unfitted meshes. Robustness is achieved by combining an $L^2$-stabilisation of the flux with an additional mixed-term stabilisation that enhances pressure control without destroying the local conservation structure. We consider both cell-wise (bulk) and face-based ghost-penalty realisations of the stabilisation. Mixed boundary conditions are handled by weak imposition of both flux and pressure traces on unfitted boundaries. We prove stability and a priori error estimates with constants independent of the cut configuration, and establish pressure-robust flux error bounds in the case of pure pressure boundary conditions. We also introduce an augmented Lagrangian variant that improves control of the conservation constraint and is amenable to efficient preconditioning strategies. Numerical experiments for a range of cut configurations, boundary-condition regimes and parameter choices confirm the theoretical results, demonstrating optimal convergence, cut-independent conditioning and mass conservation up to solver tolerance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    S. E. Woosley, J. S. Bloom,Annu. 剥v. 䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献44, 507 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    R. W. Klebesadel, I. B. Strong, R. A. Olson,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. 䱥琮182, L85 (1973)

    1973

  3. [3]

    Zhang,The Physics 潦 Lauua-Ray Bur獴猬 ISBN: 㤷㠭ㄭㄳ㤭㈲㘵㌭〮 䍡浢物摧e 啮椭 veristy 偲ess(2018)

    B. Zhang,The Physics 潦 Lauua-Ray Bur獴猬 ISBN: 㤷㠭ㄭㄳ㤭㈲㘵㌭〮 䍡浢物摧e 啮椭 veristy 偲ess(2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Lithwick, R

    Y . Lithwick, R. Sari,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.555, 540 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    J. L. Racusin,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.738, 138 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    Campana,整 al.,Nature442, 1008 (2006)

    S. Campana,整 al.,Nature442, 1008 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    Sakamoto,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.679, 570 (2008)

    T. Sakamoto,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.679, 570 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    Sun,整 al.,慲塩v 攭灲楮瑳p

    H. Sun,整 al.,慲塩v 攭灲楮瑳p. arXiv:2410.02315 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Amati,整 al.,䅳瑲on

    L. Amati,整 al.,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献390, 81 (2002)

    2002

  10. [10]

    Paczy ´nski,䅳瑲潰桹献 J

    B. Paczy ´nski,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. 䱥琮494, L45 (1998)

    1998

  11. [11]

    C. D. Dermer, J. Chiang, M. B ¨ottcher,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.513, 656 (1999)

    1999

  12. [12]

    Y . F. Huang, Z. G. Dai, T. Lu,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮332, 735 (2002)

    2002

  13. [13]

    J. E. Rhoads,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.591, 1097 (2003)

    2003

  14. [14]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. E. Woosley, A. Heger,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.608, 365 (2004)

    2004

  15. [15]

    S. B. Cenko,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.769, 130 (2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    A. Y . Q. Ho,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.938, 85 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Yuan,整 al.,arXiv 攭灲楮瑳p

    W. Yuan,整 al.,arXiv 攭灲楮瑳p. arXiv:2501.07362 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Liu,整 al.,Nature Astronouy(2025)

    Y . Liu,整 al.,Nature Astronouy(2025). 16

    2025

  19. [19]

    Burns, M

    E. Burns, M. E. Ravasio, P. G. Jonker, Fermi-GBM Team,LRB 䍯潲dinates Network 38238, 1 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials

  21. [21]

    Gruber,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J

    D. Gruber,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. Supp.211, 12 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    Band,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys

    D. Band,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys. J.413, 281 (1993)

    1993

  23. [23]

    Kaneko,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys

    Y . Kaneko,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys. J. Supp.166, 298 (2006)

    2006

  24. [24]

    L. Nava, G. Ghirlanda, G. Ghisellini, A. Celotti,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献530, A21 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    Z. Y . Liu,整 al.,LRB 䍯潲dinat敳 Network38211, 1 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Zhang,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys

    B. Zhang,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys. J.642, 354 (2006)

    2006

  27. [27]

    J. A. Nousek,整 al.,Astr潰桹献 J.642, 389 (2006)

    2006

  28. [28]

    Rossi,整 al.,LRB Coordinates Network38233, 1 (2024)

    A. Rossi,整 al.,LRB Coordinates Network38233, 1 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Wei,整 al.,arXiv e-printsp

    J. Wei,整 al.,arXiv e-printsp. arXiv:1610.06892 (2016)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    J. B. Oke,整 al.,Publ. Astron. 卯挮 Pac.107, 375 (1995)

    1995

  31. [31]

    Jiang,整 al.,慲塩v 攭灲楮瑳p

    S.-Q. Jiang,整 al.,慲塩v 攭灲楮瑳p. arXiv:2503.04306 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Tagliaferri,整 慬.,Nature436, 985 (2005)

    G. Tagliaferri,整 慬.,Nature436, 985 (2005)

    2005

  33. [33]

    Zhang, E.-W

    B.-B. Zhang, E.-W. Liang, B. Zhang,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.666, 1002 (2007)

    2007

  34. [34]

    Kumar, A

    P. Kumar, A. Panaitescu,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. 䱥琮541, L51 (2000)

    2000

  35. [35]

    Zhang, B

    B.-B. Zhang, B. Zhang, E.-W. Liang, X.-Y . Wang,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. 䱥琮690, L10 (2009)

    2009

  36. [36]

    Zhang, P

    B. Zhang, P. M ´esz´aros,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.571, 876 (2002)

    2002

  37. [37]

    Rossi, D

    E. Rossi, D. Lazzati, M. J. Rees,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮332, 945 (2002)

    2002

  38. [38]

    Z. G. Dai, T. Lu,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献333, L87 (1998). 17

    1998

  39. [39]

    R. Shen, C. D. Matzner,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.744, 36 (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    Dereli-B ´egu´e,整 al.,Nature 䍯浭畮楣慴楯湳13, 5611 (2022)

    H. Dereli-B ´egu´e,整 al.,Nature 䍯浭畮楣慴楯湳13, 5611 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Z. G. Dai, T. Lu,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮298, 87 (1998)

    1998

  42. [42]

    R. A. Chevalier, Z.-Y . Li,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. 䱥琮520, L29 (1999)

    1999

  43. [43]

    A. I. MacFadyen, S. E. Woosley,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.524, 262 (1999)

    1999

  44. [44]

    Narayan, T

    R. Narayan, T. Piran, P. Kumar,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.557, 949 (2001)

    2001

  45. [45]

    R. D. Blandford, R. L. Znajek,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮179, 433 (1977)

    1977

  46. [46]

    W.-H. Lei, B. Zhang, E.-W. Liang,Astr潰桹献 J.765, 125 (2013)

    2013

  47. [47]

    Zhang, Z

    D. Zhang, Z. G. Dai,䅳瑲ophys. J.703, 461 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. E. Woosley, A. I. MacFadyen,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.586, 356 (2003)

    2003

  49. [49]

    Zhang,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys

    C. Zhang,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys. J. 䱥琮941, L2 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Cheng,整 al.,Experiuental 䅳瑲onouy57, 10 (2024)

    H. Cheng,整 al.,Experiuental 䅳瑲onouy57, 10 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Chen,整 al.,Space Telescopes and Instruuentation 2020: 啬瑲aviolet 瑯 Lauua Ray, J.-W

    Y . Chen,整 al.,Space Telescopes and Instruuentation 2020: 啬瑲aviolet 瑯 Lauua Ray, J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, K. Nakazawa, eds. (2020), vol. 11444 ofSociety 潦 偨潴漭 Optical Instruuentation 䕮杩湥敲s ⡓偉䔩 䍯湦敲敮捥 卥物敳, p. 114445B

    2020

  52. [52]

    Goldstein,整 al.,arXiv 攭灲楮瑳p

    A. Goldstein,整 al.,arXiv 攭灲楮瑳p. arXiv:1903.12597 (2019)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  53. [53]

    Connaughton,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J

    V . Connaughton,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. Supp.216, 32 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    Poolakkil,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.913, 60 (2021)

    S. Poolakkil,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.913, 60 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    Vianello,䅳瑲潰桹献 J

    G. Vianello,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. Supp.236, 17 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    Pedichini,整 al.,䥮獴牵浥湴 Design and P敲景牭慮捥 for Optical/Infr慲敤 䝲潵湤ⵢ慳敤 Telescopes, M

    F. Pedichini,整 al.,䥮獴牵浥湴 Design and P敲景牭慮捥 for Optical/Infr慲敤 䝲潵湤ⵢ慳敤 Telescopes, M. Iye, A. F. M. Moorwood, eds. (2003), vol. 4841 ofSociety 潦 Photo-Optical Instruuentation 䕮杩湥敲s ⡓偉䔩 䍯湦敲敮捥 卥物敳, pp. 815–826. 18

    2003

  57. [57]

    Fontana,整 al.,䅳瑲on

    A. Fontana,整 al.,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献570, A11 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    I. S. McLean,整 al.,䝲潵湤ⵢ慳敤 and 䅩牢潲湥 Instruuentation for 䅳瑲onouy 䥖, I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, H. Takami, eds. (2012), vol. 8446 ofSociety 潦 Photo-Optical Instruuentation 䕮杩湥敲s ⡓偉䔩 䍯湦敲敮捥 卥物敳, p. 84460J

    2012

  59. [59]

    D. Lang, D. W. Hogg, K. Mierle, M. Blanton, S. Roweis,䅳瑲on. J.139, 1782 (2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    M. F. Skrutskie,整 慬.,䅳瑲on. J.131, 1163 (2006)

    2006

  61. [61]

    䅳瑲潰桹献674, A1 (2023)

    Gaia Collaboration,整 al.,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献674, A1 (2023)

    2023

  62. [62]

    K. C. Chambers,整 慬.,arXiv 攭灲楮瑳p. arXiv:1612.05560 (2016)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Prochaska,整 al.,T桥 J潵牮慬 潦 佰敮 卯畲捥 Software5, 2308 (2020)

    J. Prochaska,整 al.,T桥 J潵牮慬 潦 佰敮 卯畲捥 Software5, 2308 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    V . S. Dhillon,整 al.,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮507, 350 (2021)

    2021

  65. [65]

    A. C. Carnall, R. J. McLure, J. S. Dunlop, R. Dav ´e,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮480, 4379 (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    A. C. Carnall,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.873, 44 (2019)

    2019

  67. [67]

    A. Wang, T. An, C. Dai, X.-Y . Wang, EP radio follow-up Team,LRB 䍯潲dinates Network 38659, 1 (2024)

    2024

  68. [68]

    Yang,整 al.,Nature612, 232 (2022)

    J. Yang,整 al.,Nature612, 232 (2022)

    2022

  69. [69]

    Yang,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J

    J. Yang,整 al.,䅳瑲潰桹献 J. 䱥琮947, L11 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    J. M. Dickey, F. J. Lockman,Annu. 剥v. 䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献28, 215 (1990)

    1990

  71. [71]

    P. M. W. Kalberla,整 慬.,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献440, 775 (2005)

    2005

  72. [72]

    Willingale, R

    R. Willingale, R. L. C. Starling, A. P. Beardmore, N. R. Tanvir, P. T. O’Brien,䵯渮 乯琮 刮 䅳瑲on. 卯挮431, 394 (2013)

    2013

  73. [73]

    䅳瑲潰桹献594, A116 (2016)

    HI4PI Collaboration,整 al.,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献594, A116 (2016). 19

    2016

  74. [74]

    M. E. Ravasio,整 al.,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献613, A16 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    M. E. Ravasio, G. Ghirlanda, L. Nava, G. Ghisellini,䅳瑲on. 䅳瑲潰桹献625, A60 (2019)

    2019

  76. [76]

    de la Cruz-Dombriz, P

    ´A. de la Cruz-Dombriz, P. K. S. Dunsby, O. Luongo, L. Reverberi,J潵牮慬 潦 Cosuolo杹 and 䅳瑲oparticle Physics2016, 042 (2016)

    2016

  77. [77]

    K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson,Sociological Methods & 剥獥慲ch33, 261 (2004)

    2004

  78. [78]

    T. P. Li, Y . Q. Ma,䅳瑲潰桹献 J.272, 317 (1983)

    1983

  79. [79]

    Zhang,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys

    B. Zhang,整 al.,䅳瑲ophys. J.703, 1696 (2009)

    2009

  80. [80]

    B. B. Zhang,整 al.,Nature 䅳瑲onouy2, 69 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.