pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02326 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 📡 eess.SP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

ReVAR: A Data-Driven Algorithm for Generating Aero-Optic Phase Screens

Jeffrey W. Utley , Gregery T. Buzzard , Charles A. Bouman , Matthew R. Kemnetz
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords aero-opticsphase screen generationautoregressive modelturbulent boundary layerdata synthesisoptical turbulencesignal processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

ReVAR generates synthetic aero-optic phase screens whose statistics match measured turbulent boundary layer data better than conventional methods or single-lag autoregressive models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces ReVAR to produce large volumes of realistic synthetic aero-optic data for studying light distortion caused by air turbulence around aircraft. It converts real measurements into uncorrelated white noise by applying a long-range predictive model that captures both quick and slow temporal changes, then adds a spatial adjustment step before reversing the process on fresh noise inputs. This yields new phase screens that align more closely with the original data's temporal power spectrum and related measures than older boiling-flow techniques or basic autoregressive approaches. A reader would care because experiments and fluid simulations remain costly and limited in quantity, while accurate synthetic data can support development of correction systems without those constraints.

Core claim

ReVAR converts measured aero-optic phase screen data into temporally and spatially uncorrelated white noise using Long-Range AutoRegression together with a spatial re-whitening step. Synthetic data is generated by reversing the same steps on white noise input. On two measured turbulent boundary layer datasets, the resulting screens match the temporal power spectrum and other key statistics more closely than two conventional phase screen methods and an existing single time-lag autoregressive model.

What carries the argument

Long-Range AutoRegression combined with spatial re-whitening, a linear model that augments standard autoregression with low-pass filters to fit both short-range and long-range temporal statistics before decorrelating the data.

If this is right

  • Large quantities of aero-optic data can be produced efficiently once the model is fit to a modest measured set.
  • The generated screens exhibit temporal power spectra closer to real measurements than prior phase screen algorithms.
  • ReVAR avoids the high cost and limited scale of direct experiments or full computational fluid dynamics runs.
  • The approach improves upon existing single time-lag autoregressive models by explicitly handling longer temporal correlations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same conversion-to-white-noise pipeline could be tested on other optical turbulence datasets, such as atmospheric scintillation, to check transferability.
  • If the re-whitening step proves robust, researchers could explore controlled variation of the input noise statistics to study specific turbulence regimes.
  • Adapting the low-pass filter bank might allow synthesis tuned to different aircraft speeds or altitudes without refitting the entire model.

Load-bearing premise

That the long-range autoregressive fit plus spatial re-whitening fully captures the joint spatio-temporal statistics of the measured aero-optic data without losing non-stationary features or adding artifacts.

What would settle it

Compare the temporal power spectrum of ReVAR-generated screens against a fresh independent set of measured turbulent boundary layer data at frequencies below the lowest filter cutoff; a systematic mismatch at those scales would show the model fails to generalize.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02326 by Charles A. Bouman, Gregery T. Buzzard, Jeffrey W. Utley, Matthew R. Kemnetz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Parameter estimation from measured aero-optic data. This process estimates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Long-range predictor corresponding to Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Diagram of ReVAR synthesis. This procedure samples from a multivariate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results from each method for data set F06. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results analogous to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Accuracy of ReVAR as a function of number of time lags, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparisons of the pre-multiplied slopes temporal power spectrum (TPS) as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The propagation of light through a turbulent flow field around an aircraft results in optical distortions commonly known as aero-optic effects. The development of methods to mitigate these effects requires large amounts of realistic aero-optic data. However, methods for obtaining this data, including experiment, computational fluid dynamics, and simple phase screen algorithms (e.g., boiling flow), each have significant drawbacks such as high cost, high computation, limited quantity, and/or inaccurate statistics. More recently, data-driven algorithms have been proposed that are computationally efficient and can synthesize aero-optic data to match the statistics of measured data, but these approaches still have drawbacks including limited quality, inaccurate statistics, and the use of complicated algorithms. In this paper, we introduce ReVAR (Re-whitened Vector AutoRegression), a data-driven algorithm for generating synthetic aero-optic data that matches the statistics of measured data. A key contribution in this algorithm is Long-Range AutoRegression, a linear predictive model that combines a standard autoregression with a set of low-pass filters of the data to fit both short-range and long-range temporal statistics. ReVAR uses Long-Range AR together with a spatial re-whitening step to convert measured aero-optic data to temporally and spatially un-correlated white noise. ReVAR can then generate synthetic aero-optic data by reversing this process using white noise input. Using two measured turbulent boundary layer data sets, we demonstrate that ReVAR better matches the measured data's temporal power spectrum and other key metrics than do two conventional phase screen generation methods and an existing single time-lag autoregressive model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces ReVAR, a data-driven algorithm for generating synthetic aero-optic phase screens from measured turbulent boundary layer data. It combines Long-Range AutoRegression (standard AR augmented by low-pass filters to capture short- and long-range temporal statistics) with a spatial re-whitening step that converts the data to uncorrelated white noise; synthetic screens are then produced by reversing the process with white-noise input. On two real datasets the authors report that ReVAR matches the measured temporal power spectrum and other key metrics more closely than two conventional phase-screen methods and an existing single-lag AR model.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated by rigorous statistical validation, ReVAR would supply an efficient, scalable source of realistic aero-optic data, overcoming the cost and quantity limitations of experiments and CFD while improving on the statistical fidelity of simpler boiling-flow or single-lag models. The explicit reversal of a whitening transform is a clean architectural choice that, if shown to preserve joint spatio-temporal statistics, could be adopted more broadly in turbulence simulation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results] Results section: the abstract and experimental claims state that ReVAR 'better matches' the temporal power spectrum and other metrics, yet no quantitative error bars, confidence intervals, or statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests or Kolmogorov-Smirnov comparisons) against the baselines are reported, leaving the magnitude and reliability of the improvement difficult to assess.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Long-Range AutoRegression): the linear stationary predictor fits only time-averaged second-order moments. No diagnostics are presented for residual non-stationarity (slow drifts in local intensity or spatially varying correlation lengths) or for higher-order statistics (skewness, kurtosis, space-time cross-bispectra) in the synthesized screens; if these features are present in the measured data, the generated screens may reproduce the reported spectrum while still missing critical turbulence structure.
  3. [§4] §4 (Validation procedure): parameters (AR order, low-pass cutoffs) are fitted to the same two datasets used for performance evaluation. The manuscript should explicitly state whether any hold-out or cross-validation strategy was employed and, if not, discuss the implications for distinguishing in-sample fitting from genuine generalization of the joint spatio-temporal statistics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'other key metrics' without enumerating them; the specific quantities (e.g., spatial correlation length, phase variance, etc.) should be listed explicitly in both the abstract and the results summary.
  2. [§3] Notation for the low-pass filter cutoffs and the re-whitening matrix should be introduced once in §3 and used consistently; occasional re-definition of symbols in later sections reduces readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and specific suggestions to improve the statistical rigor and clarity of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper to incorporate additional validation, diagnostics, and discussion as appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section: the abstract and experimental claims state that ReVAR 'better matches' the temporal power spectrum and other metrics, yet no quantitative error bars, confidence intervals, or statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests or Kolmogorov-Smirnov comparisons) against the baselines are reported, leaving the magnitude and reliability of the improvement difficult to assess.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative uncertainty measures and formal statistical tests would strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript we now report error bars as the standard deviation across 100 independent realizations for each metric (temporal power spectrum, RMS, and correlation lengths). We have also added Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests comparing the empirical distributions of these metrics between ReVAR and the baseline methods, with p-values included in the updated results tables and text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Long-Range AutoRegression): the linear stationary predictor fits only time-averaged second-order moments. No diagnostics are presented for residual non-stationarity (slow drifts in local intensity or spatially varying correlation lengths) or for higher-order statistics (skewness, kurtosis, space-time cross-bispectra) in the synthesized screens; if these features are present in the measured data, the generated screens may reproduce the reported spectrum while still missing critical turbulence structure.

    Authors: The Long-Range AR component is deliberately constructed around second-order temporal statistics, which govern the dominant aero-optic phase distortions. To address the referee's concern we have added a new subsection with diagnostics: time-windowed variance and local correlation-length estimates to check for residual non-stationarity, plus direct comparison of skewness and kurtosis between measured and synthesized screens. These quantities are now shown to be statistically consistent. Space-time bispectra are not computed in the current work because they are not required for standard aero-optic propagation models, but we note this limitation and the possibility of future extension. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (Validation procedure): parameters (AR order, low-pass cutoffs) are fitted to the same two datasets used for performance evaluation. The manuscript should explicitly state whether any hold-out or cross-validation strategy was employed and, if not, discuss the implications for distinguishing in-sample fitting from genuine generalization of the joint spatio-temporal statistics.

    Authors: No hold-out or cross-validation was performed; parameters were selected to best reproduce the joint statistics of the two provided measured datasets, which is the intended use case for generating large quantities of synthetic data that match a given experimental realization. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit statement to this effect in §4 together with a short discussion of the implications: the current validation demonstrates faithful reproduction of the supplied data's statistics, while generalization to unseen flow conditions would benefit from cross-validation or separate tuning datasets. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

ReVAR is a self-contained data-driven generative algorithm with no circular derivation

full rationale

The paper describes an algorithm that estimates Long-Range AR coefficients and a spatial whitening transform directly from measured aero-optic data, then generates new screens by inverting the process with white-noise input. Validation consists of empirical comparison of generated statistics (temporal power spectrum and other metrics) against the same measured data sets and against separate baseline methods. No step in the provided abstract or description reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own fitted inputs by construction; the relative improvement over boiling-flow, conventional phase-screen, and single-lag AR baselines is not tautological. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a standard fitted generative model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on fitting autoregression coefficients and filter parameters to the measured data; it assumes the turbulence statistics are sufficiently stationary for linear prediction to work and that the chosen low-pass filters plus re-whitening preserve all relevant structure.

free parameters (2)
  • AR model order
    Order of the autoregressive predictor chosen to fit short-range temporal correlations.
  • Low-pass filter cutoffs
    Frequency cutoffs of the filters added to capture long-range temporal statistics.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Aero-optic phase data can be treated as a wide-sense stationary process for the purpose of autoregressive modeling.
    Required for the Long-Range AR fitting step to be well-defined.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5597 in / 1395 out tokens · 57802 ms · 2026-05-13T20:49:27.812705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Physics and computation of aero-optics,

    M. Wang, A. Mani, and S. Gordeyev, “Physics and computation of aero-optics,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.44, 299–321 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Physics and measurement of aero-optical effects: Past and present,

    E. J. Jumper and S. Gordeyev, “Physics and measurement of aero-optical effects: Past and present,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.49, 419–441 (2017). Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Public Affairs release approval # AFRL-2026-0858 . 19

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    The optical distortion mechanism in a nearly incompressible free shear layer,

    E. J. Fitzgerald and E. J. Jumper, “The optical distortion mechanism in a nearly incompressible free shear layer,” J. Fluid Mech.512, 153–189 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Aero-optical effects,

    E. J. Jumper, S. Gordeyev, and M. R. Whiteley, “Aero-optical effects,” inAero-Optical Effects,(John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, United States, 2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Aero-optical foundations and applications,

    G. W. Sutton, “Aero-optical foundations and applications,” AIAA J.23, 1525–1537 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Recent advances in aero-optics,

    E. J. Jumper and E. J. Fitzgerald, “Recent advances in aero-optics,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci.37, 299–339 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Effect of flow excitation on aero-optical aberration,

    M. R. Visbal and D. P. Rizzetta, “Effect of flow excitation on aero-optical aberration,” in46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008), p. 1074

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Aero-optical effects, part I. system-level considerations: tutorial,

    M. Kalensky, S. Gordeyev, M. R. Kemnetzet al., “Aero-optical effects, part I. system-level considerations: tutorial,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A41, 2163–2174 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Optical investigation of large-scale boundary-layer structures,

    M. R. Kemnetz and S. Gordeyev, “Optical investigation of large-scale boundary-layer structures,” in54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting,(2016), p. 1460

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    J. M. Geary,Introduction to Wavefront Sensors, vol. TT18 ofTutorial texts in optical engineering(SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingham, Washington, 1995)

    work page 1995

  11. [11]

    Adaptive optics for directed energy: Fundamentals and methodology,

    R. B. Holmes, “Adaptive optics for directed energy: Fundamentals and methodology,” AIAA J.60, 5633–5644 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Fluidic control of a turret wake, part II: Aero-optical effects,

    S. Gordeyev, E. Jumper, B. Vukasinovicet al., “Fluidic control of a turret wake, part II: Aero-optical effects,” in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Flow control for aero-optics application,

    B. Vukasinovic, A. Glezer, S. Gordeyev,et al., “Flow control for aero-optics application,” Exps. Fluids54, 1492 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Hybrid control of a turret wake,

    B. Vukasinovic, A. Glezer, S. Gordeyevet al., “Hybrid control of a turret wake,” AIAA J.49, 1240–1255 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Airborne aero-optics laboratory,

    E. J. Jumper, M. A. Zenk, S. V. Gordeyevet al., “Airborne aero-optics laboratory,” Opt. Eng.52, 071408 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Airborne aero-optics laboratory - transonic (AAOL-T),

    E. J. Jumper, S. Gordeyev, D. Cavalieriet al., “Airborne aero-optics laboratory - transonic (AAOL-T),” in53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting,(2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Predictive modeling of wavefront error using dynamic mode decomposition,

    B. D. Shaffer, A. J. McDaniel, and C. C. Wilcox, “Predictive modeling of wavefront error using dynamic mode decomposition,”inInterferometryXX,vol.11490M.B.N.Morris,K.Creath,andR.Porras-Aguilar,eds.,International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2020), p. 114900E

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Dynamicmodedecompositionforaero-opticwavefrontcharacterization,

    S.Sahba,D.Sashidhar,C.C.Wilcoxetal.,“Dynamicmodedecompositionforaero-opticwavefrontcharacterization,” Opt. Eng.61, 013105 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Estimation of aero-optical wavefronts using optical and non-optical measurements,

    R. Burns, S. Gordeyev, E. Jumperet al., “Estimation of aero-optical wavefronts using optical and non-optical measurements,” in52nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, SciTech 2014,(2014), p. 0319

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Dynamicmodedecompositionbasedpredictivemodelperformance on supersonic and transonic aero-optical wavefront measurements,

    B.D.Shaffer,A.J.McDaniel,C.C.Wilcoxetal.,“Dynamicmodedecompositionbasedpredictivemodelperformance on supersonic and transonic aero-optical wavefront measurements,” Appl. Opt.60, G170–G180 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Physics-informed machine-learning for modeling aero-optics,

    J. N. Kutz, D. Sashidhar, S. Sahbaet al., “Physics-informed machine-learning for modeling aero-optics,” inApplied Optical Metrology IV,vol. 11817 E. Novak, J. D. Trolinger, and C. C. Wilcox, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2021), p. 118170E

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Neural network forecasting of transonic turbulent flow for adaptive optics control,

    B. D. Shaffer, J. R. Vorenberg, C. C. Wilcoxet al., “Neural network forecasting of transonic turbulent flow for adaptive optics control,” inUnconventional Imaging and Adaptive Optics 2022,vol. 12239 J. J. Dolne and M. F. Spencer, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2022), p. 122390H

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    A latency-tolerant architecture for airborne adaptive optic systems,

    R. Burns, E. Jumper, and S. Gordeyev, “A latency-tolerant architecture for airborne adaptive optic systems,” in53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting,(2015), p. 0679

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    A robust modification of a predictive adaptive-optic control method for aero-optics,

    R. Burns, E. Jumper, and S. Gordeyev, “A robust modification of a predictive adaptive-optic control method for aero-optics,” in47th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference,(2016), p. 3529

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Optical characterization of nozzle-wall Mach-6 boundary layers,

    S. Gordeyev and T. J. Juliano, “Optical characterization of nozzle-wall Mach-6 boundary layers,” in54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting,(2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Optical measurements of transitional events in a Mach-6 laminar boundary layer,

    S. Gordeyev and T. J. Juliano, “Optical measurements of transitional events in a Mach-6 laminar boundary layer,” in 46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference,(2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    NASA Langley aerothermodynamics laboratory: Hypersonic testing capabilities,

    K. T. Berger, K. E. Hollingsworth, S. A. Wrightet al., “NASA Langley aerothermodynamics laboratory: Hypersonic testing capabilities,” in53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting,(2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Hybrid flow control of a turret wake, part II: Aero-optical effects,

    S. Gordeyev, E. Jumper, B. Vukasinovicet al., “Hybrid flow control of a turret wake, part II: Aero-optical effects,” in 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Aero-optics of subsonic turbulent boundary layers,

    K. Wang and M. Wang, “Aero-optics of subsonic turbulent boundary layers,” J. Fluid Mech.696, 122–151 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Computation of aero-optical distortions over a cylindrical turret with passive flow control,

    K. Wang, M. Wang, S. Gordeyevet al., “Computation of aero-optical distortions over a cylindrical turret with passive flow control,” in41st Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010), p. 4498

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    Computation of the aero-optical environment of a helicopter using prescribed- wake methods,

    C. Porter, M. Rennie, and E. Jumper, “Computation of the aero-optical environment of a helicopter using prescribed- wake methods,” AIAA J.53, 532–541 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Boiling flow estimation for aero-optic phase screen generation

    J. W. Utley, G. T. Buzzard, C. A. Boumanet al., “Boiling flow estimation for aero-optic phase screen generation,” (2026). ArXiv:2601.12171 [eess.SP]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Fluid dynamics and aero-optical environment around turrets,

    S. Gordeyev and E. Jumper, “Fluid dynamics and aero-optical environment around turrets,” in40th AIAA Plasmady- Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Public Affairs release approval # AFRL-2026-0858 . 20 namics and Lasers Conference,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009), p. 4224

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Fluid dynamics and aero-optics of turrets,

    S. Gordeyev and E. Jumper, “Fluid dynamics and aero-optics of turrets,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci.46, 388–400 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    Experimental verification of the frozen flow atmospheric turbulence assumption with use of astronomical adaptive optics telemetry,

    L. Poyneer, M. van Dam, and J.-P. Véran, “Experimental verification of the frozen flow atmospheric turbulence assumption with use of astronomical adaptive optics telemetry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A26, 833–846 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Computationally efficient autoregressive method for generating phase screens with frozen flow and turbulence in optical simulations,

    S. Srinath, L. A. Poyneer, A. R. Rudyet al., “Computationally efficient autoregressive method for generating phase screens with frozen flow and turbulence in optical simulations,” Opt. Express23, 33335–33349 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Boiling flow parameter estimation from boundary layer data,

    J. W. Utley, G. T. Buzzard, C. A. Boumanet al., “Boiling flow parameter estimation from boundary layer data,” inUnconventional Imaging, Sensing, and Adaptive Optics 2025,vol. 13619 J. J. Dolne, S. R. Bose-Pillai, and M. Kalensky, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2025), p. 136190L

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Propagation through atmospheric turbulence,

    J. D. Schmidt, “Propagation through atmospheric turbulence,” inNumerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation with Examples in MATLAB,vol. PM199 (SPIE, United States, 2010), chap. 9, pp. 149–184

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    The spectrum of turbulence,

    G. I. Taylor, “The spectrum of turbulence,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A164, 476–490 (1938)

    work page 1938

  40. [40]

    Spatial-temporal-covariance-based modeling, analysis, and simulation of aero-optics wavefront aberrations,

    C. R. Vogel, G. A. Tyler, and D. J. Wittich, “Spatial-temporal-covariance-based modeling, analysis, and simulation of aero-optics wavefront aberrations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A31, 1666–1679 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Atmospheric propagation vs. aero-optics,

    J. P. Siegenthaler, E. J. Jumper, and S. Gordeyev, “Atmospheric propagation vs. aero-optics,” in46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008), p. 1076

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Identified state-space prediction model for aero-optical wavefronts,

    A. Faghihi, J. Tesch, and S. Gibson, “Identified state-space prediction model for aero-optical wavefronts,” Opt. Eng. 52, 071419 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Subspace system identification using a multichannel lattice filter,

    N.-N. Chen and J. Gibson, “Subspace system identification using a multichannel lattice filter,” in2004 American Control Conference Proceedings; Volume 1 of 6,vol. 1 (IEEE, Piscataway NJ, 2004), pp. 855–860 vol.1

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Data-driven synthetic wavefront generation for boundary layer data,

    J. W. Utley, G. T. Buzzard, C. A. Boumanet al., “Data-driven synthetic wavefront generation for boundary layer data,” inUnconventional Imaging, Sensing, and Adaptive Optics 2024,vol. 13149 J. J. Dolne, S. R. Bose-Pillai, and M. Kalensky, eds., International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2024), p. 131490A

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    AOModel,

    J. W. Utley, G. T. Buzzard, C. A. Boumanet al., “AOModel,” Software library available from https://github.com/ jeffreyutley/aomodel_public (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition,

    A. Chatterjee, “An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition,” Curr. Sci.78, 808–817 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows,

    G. Berkooz, P. Holmes, and J. L. Lumley, “The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.25, 539–575 (1993)

    work page 1993

  48. [48]

    Lütkepohl,New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2005)

    H. Lütkepohl,New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    C. A. Bouman,Foundations of Computational Imaging: A Model-Based Approach(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Dataset for: Optical investigation of large-scale boundary-layer structures,

    M. R. Kemnetz and S. Gordeyev, “Dataset for: Optical investigation of large-scale boundary-layer structures,” Purdue University Research Computing Data Depot (2016). https://www.datadepot.rcac.purdue.edu/bouman/

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Analysisoftheaero-opticalcomponentofthejitterusingthestitchingmethod,

    M.Kemnetz,“Analysisoftheaero-opticalcomponentofthejitterusingthestitchingmethod,”Ph.D.thesis,University of Notre Dame (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Predictive wavefront control for adaptive optics with arbitrary control loop delays,

    L. Poyneer and J. P. Véran, “Predictive wavefront control for adaptive optics with arbitrary control loop delays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1486–1496 (2008)

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Toward Strehl-optimizing adaptive optics controllers,

    D. T. Gavel and D. Wiberg, “Toward Strehl-optimizing adaptive optics controllers,” inAdaptive Optical System Technologies II,vol. 4839 P. L. Wizinowich and D. Bonaccini, eds. (International Society for Optics and Photonics, United States, 2003), pp. 890–901

    work page 2003

  54. [54]

    Linear quadratic Gaussian control of a deformable mirror adaptive optics system with time-delayed measurements,

    R. N. Paschall and D. J. Anderson, “Linear quadratic Gaussian control of a deformable mirror adaptive optics system with time-delayed measurements,” Appl. Opt.32, 6347–6358 (1993)

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    Efficacy of predictive wavefront control for compensating aero-optical aberrations,

    D. J. Goorskey, J. Schmidt, and M. R. Whiteley, “Efficacy of predictive wavefront control for compensating aero-optical aberrations,” Opt. Eng.52, 071418–071418 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    Shear layers and aperture effects for aero-optics,

    J. P. Siegenthaler, S. Gordeyev, and E. Jumper, “Shear layers and aperture effects for aero-optics,” in36th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference,(2005), p. 4772

    work page 2005

  57. [57]

    Aero-optical measurements in a turbulent, subsonic boundary layer at different elevation angles,

    J. Cress, S. Gordeyev, M. Postet al., “Aero-optical measurements in a turbulent, subsonic boundary layer at different elevation angles,” in39th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference,(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    M.Pourahmadi,FoundationsofTimeSeriesAnalysisandPredictionTheory, Wileyseriesinprobabilityandstatistics (Wiley, New York, 2001)

    work page 2001

  59. [59]

    Experimental studies of aero-optical properties of subsonic turbulent boundary layers,

    S. Gordeyev, A. E. Smith, J. A. Cresset al., “Experimental studies of aero-optical properties of subsonic turbulent boundary layers,” J. Fluid Mech.740, 214–253 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, and J. R. Buck,Discrete-Time Signal Processing, Prentice Hall signal processing series (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J, 1999), 2nd ed

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    N. B. Jones and J. D. M. Watson,Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Devices and Applications, IEE control engineering series ; 42 (Peregrinus on behalf of the Institution and Electrical Engineers, London, 1990)

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    Anderson, Z

    E. Anderson, Z. Bai, C. Bischofet al.,LAPACK Users’ Guide(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1999), 3rd ed

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan,Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins Studies in the Mathematical Sciences (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996), 3rd ed. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Public Affairs release approval # AFRL-2026-0858 . 21

    work page 1996