pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02364 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-22 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Topological Anderson Random Laser

Hang-Zheng Shen , Xian-Hao Wei , Xi-Wang Luo , Zheng-Wei Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords topological Anderson insulatorrandom laserphotonic latticechiral edge statesdisorder-induced topologysingle-mode lasingtopological laser
0
0 comments X

The pith

Disorder in a trivial photonic lattice induces a topological Anderson insulator phase that creates chiral edge states for robust single-mode lasing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that engineered disorder transforms a trivial photonic lattice into a topological Anderson insulator, producing emergent chiral edge states that act as selective lasing channels. This approach unifies topological protection with the multiple-scattering feedback of random lasers. If correct, it allows high-coherence lasers to arise in imperfect systems rather than requiring flawless lattices. A reader cares because the result points to a practical route for building stable, narrow-linewidth light sources that tolerate fabrication variations better than existing designs.

Core claim

Starting from a trivial photonic lattice, engineered disorder drives the system into a topological Anderson insulator regime, generating emergent chiral edge states that serve as boundary-selective lasing channels. The TARL exhibits rapid mode selection toward a single edge state, producing an ultranarrow emission spectrum and enhanced slope efficiency optimized near disorder strength with maximal topological mobility gap. It also shows single-mode-like coherence properties that deviate from Kardar-Parisi-Zhang behavior in conventional chiral topological lasers while remaining significantly more robust against local perturbations than conventional random lasers.

What carries the argument

The topological Anderson insulator regime induced by disorder, which generates emergent chiral edge states that function as boundary-selective lasing channels.

If this is right

  • Rapid mode selection produces a single dominant edge-state laser with ultranarrow emission spectrum.
  • Slope efficiency peaks when disorder strength is set to maximize the topological mobility gap.
  • Coherence properties deviate from Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling observed in other chiral topological lasers.
  • The device maintains higher robustness to local perturbations than standard random lasers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Controlled disorder could serve as a tunable design parameter for photonic sources where perfect lattice fabrication is difficult.
  • The same disorder-to-topology route may apply to acoustic or matter-wave systems with engineered randomness.
  • Optimal disorder tuning might replace some requirements for precise geometric engineering in high-coherence laser design.

Load-bearing premise

The disorder can be tuned precisely to reach the topological Anderson insulator regime with a maximal mobility gap while still satisfying the lasing conditions without introducing extra loss or breaking the underlying lattice model.

What would settle it

Measurement of boundary-selective ultranarrow lasing with enhanced efficiency and single-mode coherence exactly at the disorder strength predicted to maximize the mobility gap, or the failure of such lasing when the gap is not present.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02364 by Hang-Zheng Shen, Xian-Hao Wei, Xi-Wang Luo, Zheng-Wei Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Band structure and topological phase characteristics.(a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Single-mode lasing behavior in TARLs. (a) Schematic demonstration of how the TARL supports a single edge mode that dominates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Slope efficiency of the TARL. (a) Laser output intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spectral and coherence properties under white temporal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Robustness of the TARL against local perturbations. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topological lasers and random lasers embody two contrasting strategies for disorder management in photonics: the former suppresses disorder via protected edge transport, while the latter exploits multiple scattering for feedback. Here, we theoretically demonstrate that these seemingly incompatible paradigms can be unified through a topological Anderson random laser (TARL), where disorder itself induces a topological phase that enables robust lasing. Starting from a trivial photonic lattice, we show that engineered disorder drives the system into a topological Anderson insulator regime, generating emergent chiral edge states that serve as boundary-selective lasing channels. Remarkably, the TARL exhibits rapid mode selection toward a single edge state, producing an ultranarrow emission spectrum and enhanced slope efficiency optimized near disorder strength with maximal topological mobility gap. Furthermore, they exhibit single-mode-like coherence properties, deviating from Kardar-Parisi-Zhang behavior in conventional chiral topological lasers, while remaining significantly more robust against local perturbations than conventional random lasers. Our findings establish a disorder-enabled flexible route to topologically protected single-mode lasing and introduce a fundamentally new design principle for robust, high-coherence photonic light sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that engineered disorder in a trivial photonic lattice drives the system into a topological Anderson insulator phase, producing emergent chiral edge states that function as boundary-selective lasing channels. This yields a topological Anderson random laser (TARL) with rapid single-mode selection, ultranarrow emission, enhanced slope efficiency near the maximal mobility gap, single-mode-like coherence deviating from KPZ scaling, and greater robustness to perturbations than conventional random lasers.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would establish a disorder-induced route to topologically protected lasing that unifies topological and random-laser paradigms, potentially enabling flexible, high-coherence photonic sources. The reported optimization at maximal mobility gap and deviation from KPZ behavior would be notable strengths if quantitatively demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [topological characterization / methods] The topological Anderson insulator diagnostics (real-space Chern marker, localization length, or Bott index) are standard for closed Hermitian Hamiltonians. The manuscript must specify in the topological characterization section how these invariants are extended or recomputed once non-Hermitian gain terms are introduced via rate equations or complex eigenvalues; without this, the protection of the emergent edge states under lasing conditions remains an extrapolation.
  2. [results on lasing threshold and spectrum] The claim that lasing occurs preferentially through the disorder-induced chiral edge states with maximal mobility gap requires explicit threshold calculations and mode-competition simulations that include saturable gain and loss; the abstract states optimization near this gap, but the supporting figures or equations must demonstrate that competing bulk or non-topological modes are suppressed rather than assumed.
  3. [coherence and robustness analysis] The reported deviation from Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling and enhanced robustness to local perturbations must be backed by direct comparison of coherence functions and perturbation response between the TARL and both conventional random lasers and Hermitian topological lasers; these comparisons are load-bearing for the unification claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [model definition] Clarify the precise lattice model (e.g., honeycomb or square with specific couplings) and the functional form of the engineered disorder in the methods section to allow reproducibility.
  2. [abstract] The abstract uses 'they exhibit' when referring to the TARL; replace with explicit subject for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript on the topological Anderson random laser. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The topological Anderson insulator diagnostics (real-space Chern marker, localization length, or Bott index) are standard for closed Hermitian Hamiltonians. The manuscript must specify in the topological characterization section how these invariants are extended or recomputed once non-Hermitian gain terms are introduced via rate equations or complex eigenvalues; without this, the protection of the emergent edge states under lasing conditions remains an extrapolation.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important clarification request. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the topological characterization section to explicitly state that the real-space Chern marker and Bott index are computed on the underlying Hermitian lattice Hamiltonian that sets the topological phase. The non-Hermitian gain and loss enter only through the saturable rate equations for the active medium; we have added a new paragraph and supplementary note arguing that the topological protection persists because the photonic mode dynamics remain adiabatically slaved to the Hermitian topology on timescales faster than gain saturation. Relevant references on non-Hermitian topological markers have been included. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim that lasing occurs preferentially through the disorder-induced chiral edge states with maximal mobility gap requires explicit threshold calculations and mode-competition simulations that include saturable gain and loss; the abstract states optimization near this gap, but the supporting figures or equations must demonstrate that competing bulk or non-topological modes are suppressed rather than assumed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit threshold and mode-competition evidence is necessary. We have performed additional simulations that incorporate saturable gain and loss via the full rate equations and have added these results as a new figure and supplementary section. The calculations show that the lasing threshold is minimized for the chiral edge states near the maximal mobility gap while bulk and non-topological modes remain below threshold, thereby confirming the preferential selection and optimization stated in the abstract. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The reported deviation from Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling and enhanced robustness to local perturbations must be backed by direct comparison of coherence functions and perturbation response between the TARL and both conventional random lasers and Hermitian topological lasers; these comparisons are load-bearing for the unification claim.

    Authors: We appreciate this suggestion for strengthening the comparative analysis. In the revised manuscript we have added direct side-by-side comparisons of the coherence functions and local-perturbation response for the TARL, a conventional random laser, and a Hermitian topological laser. These results are presented in a new figure and accompanying text, quantitatively demonstrating both the deviation from KPZ scaling and the enhanced robustness of the TARL, thereby supporting the unification claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies standard TAI invariants to disordered Hermitian lattice then adds gain separately

full rationale

The paper starts from a trivial photonic lattice, introduces engineered disorder to induce a topological Anderson insulator phase via standard real-space invariants (Chern marker, Bott index, localization length), and then incorporates gain for lasing. No quoted equation reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain justifies the central uniqueness claim, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The Hermitian-to-non-Hermitian transition is an explicit modeling step rather than a definitional identity. This is the normal case of an independent theoretical construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on standard photonic lattice models and the existence of a disorder-induced topological Anderson insulator phase; limited free parameters are implied by optimization at maximal mobility gap.

free parameters (1)
  • disorder strength
    Tuned to achieve maximal topological mobility gap for optimized lasing efficiency and mode selection.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard tight-binding or coupled-mode model for the photonic lattice supports topological Anderson localization under disorder.
    Invoked as the starting point for the trivial lattice and disorder engineering.
invented entities (1)
  • topological Anderson random laser (TARL) no independent evidence
    purpose: New unified lasing platform using disorder-induced topology.
    Introduced as the central concept; no independent evidence provided beyond the theoretical demonstration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1236 out tokens · 42109 ms · 2026-05-15T01:05:25.633076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari,et al., Physical Review Letters116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hell, Science316, 1153 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    F. Xu, B. Liu, Z. Wan, X. Li, G. Huang, H. Guo, X. Ma, and J.-W. Pan, Physical Review Letters127, 053602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Marin-Palomo, J

    P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V . Brasch, M. H. Anderson, et al., Nature546, 274 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y .-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y .- H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y . Hu,et al., Science370, 1460 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Carolan, C

    J. Carolan, C. Harrold, C. Sparrow, E. Mart ´ın-L´opez, N. J. Rus- sell, J. W. Silverstone, P. J. Shadbolt, N. Matsuda, M. Oguma, M. Itoh,et al., Science349, 711 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Thyagarajan and A

    K. Thyagarajan and A. Ghatak, Semiclassical theory of the laser, inLasers: Fundamentals and Applications(Springer US, Boston, MA, 2011) pp. 121–141

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Rei- der, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Nature414, 509 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    S. A. Diddams, D. J. Jones, J. Ye, S. T. Cundiff, J. L. Hall, J. K. Ranka, R. S. Windeler, R. Holzwarth, T. Udem, and T. W. H¨ansch, Physical Review Letters84, 5102 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V . Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lema ˆıtre, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Nature Photonics 11, 651 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Bahari, A

    B. Bahari, A. Ndao, F. Vallini, A. E. Amili, Y . Fainman, and B. Kant´e, Science358, 636 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y . Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y . D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev, Science359, eaar4003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Science 359, eaar4005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg,et al., Reviews of Modern Physics91, 015006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Li, X.-W

    Z. Li, X.-W. Luo, and Q. Gu, APL Photonics8, 070901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Y . Zeng, U. Chattopadhyay, B. Zhu, B. Qiang, J. Li, Y . Jin, L. Li, A. G. Davies, E. H. Linfield, B. Zhang, Y . Chong, and Q. J. Wang, Nature578, 246 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    L. Yang, G. Li, X. Gao, and L. Lu, Nature Photonics16, 279 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Amelio and I

    I. Amelio and I. Carusotto, Physical Review X10, 041060 7 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Deligiannis, Q

    K. Deligiannis, Q. Fontaine, D. Squizzato, M. Richard, S. Ravets, J. Bloch, A. Minguzzi, and L. Canet, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043207 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Ahmad, H

    A. Ahmad, H. Dai, S. Feng, Z. Chen, Z. Mohmaed, A. A. Khan, X. Hao, Y . Wang, N. Iqbal, and D. Mehvish, J. Mater. Chem. C 13, 2606 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Zhanget al., Journal of Luminescence277, 120946 (2024)

    Y . Zhanget al., Journal of Luminescence277, 120946 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    L. J. Prokopeva, C. Fruhling, S. Chowdhury, and A. Kildishev, inProceedings of SPIE 13110, Active Photonic Platforms(SPIE,

    work page

  23. [23]

    Dipold, L

    J. Dipold, L. R. P. Kassab, and N. U. Wetter, Photonics11, 10.3390/photonics11100898 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/photonics11100898 2024

  24. [24]

    Segev, Y

    M. Segev, Y . Silberberg, and D. N. Christodoulides, Nature Photonics7, 197 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    M. Lee, S. Callard, C. Seassal, and H. Jeon, Nature Photonics 13, 445 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    H. P. Adl, J. S ´anchez-D´ıaz, G. Vescio, A. Cirera, B. Garrido, F. A. V . Pacheco, W.˙Zuraw, Ł. Przypis, S. ¨Oz, I. Mora-Ser´o, J. P. Mart´ınez-Pastor, and I. Su´arez, Advanced Materials36, 2313252 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Shawki, H

    H. Shawki, H. Kotb, and D. Khalil, Opt. Lett.42, 3247 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    A. Dey, A. Pramanik, S. Biswas, P. Kumbhakar, and P. Kumb- hakar, Developments of random laser: Fundamentals and ap- plications, inHandbook of Materials Science, V olume 1: Opti- cal Materials(Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2024) pp. 341–368

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Padiyakkuth, S

    N. Padiyakkuth, S. Thomas, R. Antoine, and N. Kalarikkal, Mater. Adv.3, 6687 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Li, R.-L

    J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Physical Review Letters102, 136806 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, J. Tworzydło, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Physical Review Letters 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.103.196805 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2009

  32. [32]

    Shen, Topological andersontopological anderson insula- torinsulator, inTopological Insulators: Dirac Equation in Con- densed Matter(Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2017) pp

    S.-Q. Shen, Topological andersontopological anderson insula- torinsulator, inTopological Insulators: Dirac Equation in Con- densed Matter(Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2017) pp. 231– 241

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Y . Xing, L. Zhang, and J. Wang, Physical Review B84, 035110 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Jiang, L

    H. Jiang, L. Wang, Q.-f. Sun, and X. C. Xie, Physical Review B80, 165316 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Science314, 1757 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    St ¨utzer, Y

    S. St ¨utzer, Y . Plotnik, Y . Lumer, P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Nature560, 461 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    G.-G. Liu, Y . Yang, X. Ren, H. Xue, X. Lin, Y .-H. Hu, H.-x. Sun, B. Peng, P. Zhou, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Physical Review Letters125, 133603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Chen, Z.-X

    X.-D. Chen, Z.-X. Gao, X. Cui, H.-C. Mo, W.-J. Chen, R.-Y . Zhang, C. T. Chan, and J.-W. Dong, Physical Review Letters133, 133802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    B. D. Assunc ¸˜ao, G. J. Ferreira, and C. H. Lewenkopf, Physical Review B109, L201102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Wu, L.-Z

    Y .-P. Wu, L.-Z. Tang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A106, L051301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Qi, Y .-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y .-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Physical Review B74, 085308 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    J. K. Asb ´oth, L. Oroszl ´any, and A. P ´alyi, Two-dimensional chern insulators: The qi-wu-zhang model, inA Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band Structure and Edge States in One and Two Dimensions(Springer International Publishing, Cham,

    work page

  43. [43]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Hikami, Progress of Theoretical Physics76, 1210 (1986), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/76/6/1210/5344609/76-6-1210.pdf

    S. Hikami, Progress of Theoretical Physics76, 1210 (1986), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/76/6/1210/5344609/76-6-1210.pdf

    work page 1986

  45. [45]

    Secl `ı and I

    M. Secl `ı and I. Carusotto, in2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and European Quantum Electronics Con- ference(Optica Publishing Group, 2019) p. pd 2 5

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Secl `ı, M

    M. Secl `ı, M. Capone, and I. Carusotto, Physical Review Re- search1, 033148 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics: 60th Anniversary Edition, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    H. Deng, G. S. Solomon, R. Hey, K. H. Ploog, and Y . Ya- mamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 126403 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Fontaine, D

    Q. Fontaine, D. Squizzato, F. Baboux, I. Amelio, A. Lema ˆıtre, M. Morassi, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, M. Wouters, I. Carusotto, A. Amo, M. Richard, A. Minguzzi, L. Canet, S. Ravets, and J. Bloch, Nature608, 687 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    B. Wu, J. Ding, W. Yan, Y . Jia, H. Yu, X. Ni, and F. Chen, Nature Communications17, 1426 (2026). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Calculation of the local chern marker We characterize the Chern number by calculating the averaged local Chern marker at the center of the sample. The local Chern marker is defined as: C(m, n) =−2πi X s ⟨m, n, s|[P occxPocc, PoccyPoc...

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Li, R.-L

    J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Topological anderson insulator, Physical Review Letters102, 136806 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    St ¨utzer, Y

    S. St ¨utzer, Y . Plotnik, Y . Lumer, P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Photonic topological anderson insulators, Nature560, 461 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    G.-G. Liu, Y . Yang, X. Ren, H. Xue, X. Lin, Y .-H. Hu, H.-x. Sun, B. Peng, P. Zhou, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological anderson insulator in disordered photonic crystals, Physical Review Letters125, 133603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Chen, Z.-X

    X.-D. Chen, Z.-X. Gao, X. Cui, H.-C. Mo, W.-J. Chen, R.-Y . Zhang, C. T. Chan, and J.-W. Dong, Realization of time-reversal invariant photonic topological anderson insulators, Physical Review Letters133, 133802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    B. D. Assunc ¸˜ao, G. J. Ferreira, and C. H. Lewenkopf, Phase transitions and scale invariance in topological anderson insulators, Physical Review B109, L201102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Wu, L.-Z

    Y .-P. Wu, L.-Z. Tang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Quantized topological anderson-thouless pump, Phys. Rev. A106, L051301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum computation (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Amelio and I

    I. Amelio and I. Carusotto, Theory of the coherence of topological lasers, Physical Review X10, 041060 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Cui, R.-Y

    X. Cui, R.-Y . Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Photonic z 2 topological anderson insulators, Physical Review Letters129, 043902 (2022)

    work page 2022