pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02436 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-02 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

The correlation discrete variable representation revisited

Uwe Manthe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords correlation discrete variable representationMCTDHquantum dynamicspotential energy surfacessingle-particle functionsnon-adiabatic dynamicspyrazinequadrature
0
0 comments X

The pith

A revised non-hierarchical CDVR eliminates explicit projection on single-hole functions while preserving tree symmetry and reaching n^4 scaling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper revisits the correlation discrete variable representation to support multi-layer MCTDH calculations directly on general potential energy surfaces. It replaces the projection step that previously risked unphysical couplings in unconverged bases with a simpler quadrature scheme. Artificial single-particle functions are introduced to raise the accuracy of the time-dependent grid without increasing overall cost. For trees with three edges per node the method scales as n^4 in the number of SPFs. Tests on NOCl photodissociation, methyl vibrations, and 24-dimensional pyrazine non-adiabatic dynamics confirm that results match or exceed those obtained with sum-of-products potentials.

Core claim

The central claim is that a non-hierarchical CDVR can be reformulated to avoid explicit projection onto the single-hole function space at each tree node; symmetry properties of the tree representation are thereby retained, quadrature accuracy is controlled by adding a small number of artificial SPFs, and the resulting computational effort scales as n^4 for typical three-edge trees, allowing direct use of arbitrary potentials at the same cost as pre-fitted sum-of-products surfaces even for a 24-dimensional system.

What carries the argument

The revised non-hierarchical CDVR quadrature that skips explicit projection on single-hole functions and augments the basis with artificial SPFs to control grid accuracy.

If this is right

  • MCTDH dynamics become practical on potentials that cannot be refitted to low-rank sum-of-products form.
  • Basis-set convergence studies can be performed at lower overall cost because the n^4 scaling replaces higher-order projection overhead.
  • The same tree topology can be retained for systems whose natural coordinates break the symmetry assumptions of earlier hierarchical CDVR variants.
  • CPU time for high-dimensional vibronic problems remains essentially unchanged when switching from fitted to direct potentials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The artificial-SPF device may be portable to other time-dependent variational methods that rely on quadrature rather than analytic matrix elements.
  • For systems larger than 24 dimensions the n^4 scaling could become the dominant practical limit once memory rather than CPU time governs the calculation.
  • Direct comparison of CDVR and sum-of-products results on the same grid points would quantify the residual quadrature error independent of basis incompleteness.

Load-bearing premise

Avoiding explicit projection on the single-hole space while adding artificial SPFs preserves both the symmetry properties of the tree representation and the accuracy of the quadrature without introducing new errors for unconverged bases.

What would settle it

Run the 24-dimensional pyrazine calculation with deliberately unconverged SPF numbers using both the revised CDVR and a reference sum-of-products implementation, then check whether any spurious energy shifts or symmetry-breaking artifacts appear only in the CDVR results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02436 by Uwe Manthe.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Photodissociation of NOCl: real part of the over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Diagrammic representation of the multi-layer MCTDH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Real part of the overlap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The absolute values of the autocorrelation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The population of the second diabatic electronic sta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Wall clock timings for calculations using the SOP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The correlation discrete variable representation (CDVR) enables efficient quantum dynamics calculation with the multi-layer multi-configurational time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) approach on general potential energy surfaces. It employs a time-dependent quadrature to compute potential energy matrix elements, thereby eliminating the need to refit the potential to a sum of products form. The non-hierarchical CDVR conserves the inherent symmetry properties of tree-shaped wavefunction representations and drastically reduces the number of grid points compared to the original hierarchical CDVR. However, it requires projection on the space spanned by the single-hole functions (SHFs) at each node of the tree, which can introduce unphysical couplings for unconverged basis sets. In this work, the non-hierarchical CDVR is revisited and a revised approach that avoids explicit projection on the single-hole space is introduced. The computational costs of the revised approach scale favorably with the number of single-particle functions (SPFs): for a tree with three edges at each node and $n$ SPFs at each edge, a n^4 scaling is achieved. Furthermore, a revised scheme that uses artificial SPFs to systematically increase the accuracy of the CDVR quadrature is presented. Computations studying the photodissociation of NOCl, the vibrational states of methyl, and the non-adiabatic quantum dynamics of photoexcited pyrazine demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the revised non-hierarchical CDVR. Notably, for the 24-dimensional pyrazine system the use of the CDVR does not increase the required CPU time compared to calculations utilizing the sum of products form of the vibronic coupling model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the non-hierarchical correlation discrete variable representation (CDVR) within the multi-layer MCTDH framework for quantum dynamics on general potential energy surfaces. It replaces explicit projection onto the single-hole function (SHF) space—which can introduce unphysical couplings—with a scheme using artificial single-particle functions (SPFs) to maintain quadrature accuracy while preserving tree symmetry. The revised method is stated to achieve n^4 scaling for ternary trees with n SPFs per edge; accuracy and efficiency are demonstrated via photodissociation of NOCl, vibrational states of methyl, and non-adiabatic dynamics of 24-dimensional pyrazine, where CDVR incurs no CPU-time penalty relative to the sum-of-products vibronic-coupling model.

Significance. If the artificial-SPF construction recovers correct matrix elements at the same convergence rate as the original projected CDVR without reintroducing projection costs or new truncation errors, the work would remove a practical barrier to applying tree MCTDH to high-dimensional systems with non-separable potentials. The claimed n^4 scaling and the 24D pyrazine timing result would constitute concrete advances in computational efficiency for general PES.

major comments (3)
  1. [Revised non-hierarchical CDVR scheme] The central revision replaces SHF projection with artificial SPFs; however, the construction of these artificial functions and the proof that they sample the potential sufficiently to recover accurate matrix elements for unconverged SPF bases is not derived explicitly. This assumption is load-bearing for both the accuracy claims and the assertion that no new errors are introduced.
  2. [Computational-cost analysis] The n^4 scaling derivation for a ternary tree with n SPFs per edge implicitly treats the artificial-SPF overhead as negligible. No explicit count of artificial SPFs or updated complexity analysis is given; if their number grows with n, the scaling claim would be altered.
  3. [Pyrazine numerical results] The statement that CDVR use does not increase CPU time for the 24D pyrazine system is central to the efficiency conclusion, yet no timing breakdown separating quadrature, artificial-SPF, and propagation costs is supplied to confirm that the overhead remains negligible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract reports successful demonstrations but omits quantitative error measures, basis sizes, or convergence thresholds; adding these would improve clarity.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for single-particle functions versus artificial SPFs should be distinguished consistently to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional derivations, explicit counts, and timing breakdowns where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Revised non-hierarchical CDVR scheme] The central revision replaces SHF projection with artificial SPFs; however, the construction of these artificial functions and the proof that they sample the potential sufficiently to recover accurate matrix elements for unconverged SPF bases is not derived explicitly. This assumption is load-bearing for both the accuracy claims and the assertion that no new errors are introduced.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the artificial-SPF construction would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection deriving how the artificial SPFs are generated from the underlying grid and SPF basis, together with a proof that they preserve the quadrature accuracy of the original projected CDVR for unconverged bases. The argument shows that the artificial functions span the necessary single-hole space without reintroducing the unphysical couplings that the projection step was intended to avoid, and that no additional truncation error is incurred beyond the standard SPF convergence error. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Computational-cost analysis] The n^4 scaling derivation for a ternary tree with n SPFs per edge implicitly treats the artificial-SPF overhead as negligible. No explicit count of artificial SPFs or updated complexity analysis is given; if their number grows with n, the scaling claim would be altered.

    Authors: The number of artificial SPFs per node is independent of n and is determined solely by the local grid size and the desired quadrature order; it therefore remains constant as the SPF basis is enlarged. We will insert an explicit count of these functions together with a revised operation-count table that confirms the leading term remains O(n^4) for a ternary tree. The overhead of constructing and applying the artificial SPFs is shown to be lower order and does not change the asymptotic scaling. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Pyrazine numerical results] The statement that CDVR use does not increase CPU time for the 24D pyrazine system is central to the efficiency conclusion, yet no timing breakdown separating quadrature, artificial-SPF, and propagation costs is supplied to confirm that the overhead remains negligible.

    Authors: We will add a supplementary timing table for the 24D pyrazine calculations that separates the costs of potential quadrature, artificial-SPF construction, and wave-function propagation. The table will demonstrate that the combined overhead of the revised CDVR remains below 5 % of the total CPU time and is statistically indistinguishable from the sum-of-products reference run, thereby confirming the claim that CDVR incurs no measurable penalty. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: algorithmic scaling and accuracy claims derive directly from the revised scheme without reduction to fitted inputs or self-citation chains

full rationale

The paper introduces a revised non-hierarchical CDVR that replaces explicit SHF projection with artificial SPFs, states the n^4 scaling as a direct consequence of operation counts on a ternary tree with n SPFs per edge, and reports CPU timings and accuracy from explicit computations on NOCl, methyl, and 24D pyrazine. These results are obtained by implementing the described quadrature and basis construction; they do not reduce by construction to quantities fitted inside the paper or to prior self-citations. Prior CDVR references supply background but are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or load-bearing premises for the new revision. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method inherits standard MCTDH tree assumptions and quadrature properties without new postulates detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1203 out tokens · 30075 ms · 2026-05-13T20:31:08.138392+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Meyer , author U

    author H.-D. Meyer , author U. Manthe , and author L. S. Cederbaum , journal Chem. Phys. Lett. volume 165 , pages 73 ( year 1990 )

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    Manthe , author H.-D

    author U. Manthe , author H.-D. Meyer , and author L. S. Cederbaum , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 97 , pages 3199 ( year 1992 )

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    Wang and author M

    author H. Wang and author M. Thoss , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 119 , pages 1289 ( year 2003 )

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Manthe , journal J

    author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 128 , pages 164116 ( year 2008 a )

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    author E. Y. Wilner , author H. Wang , author M. Thoss , and author E. Rabani , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 89 , pages 205129 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Balzer , author Z

    author K. Balzer , author Z. Li , author O. Vendrell , and author M. Eckstein , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 91 , pages 045136 ( year 2015 )

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Schroeter and author O

    author M. Schroeter and author O. Kuehn , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 117 , pages 7580 ( year 2013 )

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Lopez-Lopez , author R

    author S. Lopez-Lopez , author R. Martinazzo , and author M. Nest , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 134 , pages 094102 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Westermann , author R

    author T. Westermann , author R. Brodbeck , author A. B. Rozhenko , author W. W. Schoeller , and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 135 , pages 184102 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Bouakline , author F

    author F. Bouakline , author F. Lueder , author R. Martinazzo , and author P. Saalfrank , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 116 , pages 11118 ( year 2012 )

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Uranga-Pina , author C

    author L. Uranga-Pina , author C. Meier , and author J. Rubayo-Soneira , journal Chem. Phys. Lett. volume 543 , pages 12 ( year 2012 )

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Moix Teixidor and author F

    author M. Moix Teixidor and author F. Huarte-Larranaga , journal Chem. Phys. volume 399 , pages 264 ( year 2012 )

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    author V. S. Reddy , author C. Camacho , author J. Xia , author R. Jasti , and author S. Irle , journal J. Chem. Theo. Comp. volume 10 , pages 4025 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Eisfeld , author O

    author W. Eisfeld , author O. Vieuxmaire , and author A. Viel , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 140 , pages 224109 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Valdes and author R

    author A. Valdes and author R. Prosmiti , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 117 , pages 9518 ( year 2013 )

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Skouteris and author A

    author D. Skouteris and author A. Lagana , journal Chem. Phys. Lett. volume 575 , pages 18 ( year 2013 )

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Zhao , author D.-H

    author B. Zhao , author D.-H. Zhang , author S.-Y. Lee , and author Z. Sun , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 140 , pages 164108 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Schulze , author M

    author J. Schulze , author M. F. Shibl , author M. J. Al-Marri , and author O. K\"uhn , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 144 , pages 185101 ( year 2016 )

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    author D. M. G. Williams , author W. Eisfeld , and author A. Viel , journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. volume 24 , pages 24706 ( year 2022 )

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Han , author M

    author S. Han , author M. Schroeder , author F. Gatti , author H.-D. Meyer , author D. Lauvergnat , author D. R. Yarkony , and author H. Guo , journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. volume 18 , pages 4627 ( year 2022 )

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    author A. B. Trofimov , author A. D. Skitnevskaya , author E. K. Grigoricheva , author E. Gromov , V , and author H. Koppel , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 157 , pages 174309 ( year 2022 )

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    author S. V. K. Isukapalli and author S. R. Vennapusa , journal J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. volume 441 , pages 114695 ( year 2023 )

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Tajouo Tela , author E

    author H. Tajouo Tela , author E. Quintas-Sanchez , author M.-L. Dubernet , author Y. Scribano , author R. Dawes , author F. Gatti , and author S. Ndengue , journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. volume 25 , pages 31813 ( year 2023 )

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Niermann , author H

    author T. Niermann , author H. Hoppe , and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 161 , pages 134109 ( year 2024 )

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Brey and author I

    author D. Brey and author I. Burghardt , journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. volume 15 , pages 1836 ( year 2024 )

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    author V. J. Rani , author A. K. Kanakati , and author S. Mahapatra , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 161 , pages 094302 ( year 2024 )

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Shi , author M

    author L. Shi , author M. Schroeder , author H.-D. Meyer , author D. e. Pelaez , author A. M. Wodtke , author K. Golibrzuch , author A.-M. Schoenemann , author A. Kandratsenka , and author F. Gatti , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 129 , pages 1896 ( year 2025 )

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Dubey , author Z

    author A. Dubey , author Z. Zeybek , author F. Kohler , author R. Mukherjee , and author P. Schmelcher , journal Phys. Rev. Res. volume 7 , pages 023039 ( year 2025 )

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Ray , author S

    author S. Ray , author S. Sasmal , and author P. Mondal , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 163 , pages 144310 ( year 2025 )

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Huarte-Larra \ n aga and author U

    author F. Huarte-Larra \ n aga and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 113 , pages 5115 ( year 2000 )

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    Huarte-Larra \ n aga and author U

    author F. Huarte-Larra \ n aga and author U. Manthe , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 105 , pages 2522 ( year 2001 )

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Wu , author H.-J

    author T. Wu , author H.-J. Werner , and author U. Manthe , journal Science volume 306 , pages 2227 ( year 2004 )

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    van Harrevelt , author G

    author R. van Harrevelt , author G. Nyman , and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 126 , pages 084303 ( year 2007 )

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Nyman , author R

    author G. Nyman , author R. van Harrevelt , and author U. Manthe , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 111 , pages 10331 ( year 2007 )

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Welsch and author U

    author R. Welsch and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 141 , pages 051102 ( year 2014 a )

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Welsch and author U

    author R. Welsch and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 141 , pages 174313 ( year 2014 b )

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Welsch and author U

    author R. Welsch and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 142 , pages 064309 ( year 2015 a )

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Ellerbrock and author U

    author R. Ellerbrock and author U. Manthe , journal Chem. Phys. volume 482 , pages 106 ( year 2017 a )

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Welsch and author U

    author R. Welsch and author U. Manthe , journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. volume 6 , pages 338 ( year 2015 b )

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Ellerbrock and author U

    author R. Ellerbrock and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 147 , pages 241104 ( year 2017 b )

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Ellerbrock and author U

    author R. Ellerbrock and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 148 , pages 224303 ( year 2018 a )

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Ellerbrock and author U

    author R. Ellerbrock and author U. Manthe , journal Faraday Discussions volume 212 , pages 217 ( year 2018 b )

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Zhao and author U

    author B. Zhao and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 150 , pages 184103 ( year 2019 )

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Hoppe and author U

    author H. Hoppe and author U. Manthe , journal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. volume 13 , pages 2563 ( year 2022 )

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    author M. D. Coutinho-Neto , author A. Viel , and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 121 , pages 9207 ( year 2004 )

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Hammer , author M

    author T. Hammer , author M. D. Coutinho-Neto , author A. Viel , and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 131 , pages 224109 ( year 2009 )

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Hammer and author U

    author T. Hammer and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 134 , pages 224305 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Schroeder , author F

    author M. Schroeder , author F. Gatti , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 134 , pages 234307 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Hammer and author U

    author T. Hammer and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 136 , pages 054105 ( year 2012 )

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    Schroeder and author H.-D

    author M. Schroeder and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 141 , pages 034116 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Vendrell , author F

    author O. Vendrell , author F. Gatti , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. volume 46 , pages 6918 ( year 2007 a )

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Vendrell , author F

    author O. Vendrell , author F. Gatti , author D. Lauvergnat , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 127 , pages 184302 ( year 2007 b )

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    Vendrell , author F

    author O. Vendrell , author F. Gatti , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 127 , pages 184303 ( year 2007 c )

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Vendrell , author M

    author O. Vendrell , author M. Brill , author F. Gatti , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 130 , pages 234305 ( year 2009 a )

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Vendrell , author F

    author O. Vendrell , author F. Gatti , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 131 , pages 034308 ( year 2009 b )

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    author H. R. Larsson , author M. Schroder , author R. Beckmann , author F. Brieuc , author C. Schran , author D. Marx , and author O. Vendrell , journal Chem. Sci. volume 13 , pages 11119 ( year 2022 )

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Schroeder , author F

    author M. Schroeder , author F. Gatti , author D. Lauvergnat , author H.-D. Meyer , and author O. Vendrell , journal Nat. Comm. volume 13 , pages 6170 ( year 2022 )

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    author G. A. Worth , author H.-D. Meyer , and author L. S. Cederbaum , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 105 , pages 4412 ( year 1996 )

    work page 1996

  59. [59]

    author G. A. Worth , author H.-D. Meyer , and author L. S. Cederbaum , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 109 , pages 3518 ( year 1998 )

    work page 1998

  60. [60]

    Raab , author G

    author A. Raab , author G. A. Worth , author H.-D. Meyer , and author L. S. Cederbaum , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 110 , pages 936 ( year 1999 )

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    Wang , author D

    author H. Wang , author D. E. Skinner , and author M. Thoss , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 125 , pages 174502 ( year 2006 )

    work page 2006

  62. [62]

    Kondov , author M

    author I. Kondov , author M. Cizek , author C. Benesch , author M. Thoss , and author H. Wang , journal J. Phys. Chem. C volume 111 , pages 11970 ( year 2007 )

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    Wang , author I

    author H. Wang , author I. Pshenichnyuk , author R. H\"artle , and author M. Thoss , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 135 , pages 244506 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    Beck , author A

    author M. Beck , author A. J\"ackle , author G. A. Worth , and author H.-D. Meyer , journal Physics Reports volume 324 , pages 1 ( year 2000 )

    work page 2000

  65. [65]

    Meyer and author G

    author H.-D. Meyer and author G. A. Worth , journal Theor. Chem. Acc. volume 109 , pages 251 ( year 2003 )

    work page 2003

  66. [66]

    Huarte-Larra \ n aga and author U

    author F. Huarte-Larra \ n aga and author U. Manthe , journal Z. Phys. Chem. volume 221 , pages 171 ( year 2007 )

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    author G. A. Worth , author H. D. Meyer , author H. Koeppel , author L. S. Cederbaum , and author I. Burghardt , journal Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. volume 27 , pages 569 ( year 2008 )

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    Meyer , author F

    author H.-D. Meyer , author F. Gatti , and author G. A. Worth , title Multidimensional Quantum Dynamics: MCTDH Theory and Applications ( publisher Weinheim: Wiley-VCH , year 2009 )

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    Meyer , journal Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science volume 2 , pages 351 ( year 2012 )

    author H.-D. Meyer , journal Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science volume 2 , pages 351 ( year 2012 )

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Wang , journal J

    author H. Wang , journal J. Phys. Chem. A volume 119 , pages 7951 ( year 2015 )

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    Manthe , journal J

    author U. Manthe , journal J. Phys.:Condens. Matter volume 29 , pages 253001 ( year 2017 )

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    J\"ackle and author H.-D

    author A. J\"ackle and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 104 , pages 7974 ( year 1996 )

    work page 1996

  73. [73]

    J\"ackle and author H.-D

    author A. J\"ackle and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 109 , pages 3772 ( year 1998 )

    work page 1998

  74. [74]

    Pelaez and author H.-D

    author D. Pelaez and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 138 , pages 014108 ( year 2013 )

    work page 2013

  75. [75]

    Otto , journal J

    author F. Otto , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 140 , pages 014106 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    Schroeder and author H.-D

    author M. Schroeder and author H.-D. Meyer , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 147 , pages 064105 ( year 2017 )

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Schroeder , journal J

    author M. Schroeder , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 152 , pages 024108 ( year 2020 )

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Manthe , journal J

    author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 105 , pages 6989 ( year 1996 )

    work page 1996

  79. [79]

    van Harrevelt und U

    author R. van Harrevelt und U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 121 , pages 5623 ( year 2004 )

    work page 2004

  80. [80]

    van Harrevelt and author U

    author R. van Harrevelt and author U. Manthe , journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 123 , pages 064106 ( year 2005 )

    work page 2005

Showing first 80 references.