pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02634 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Robust Beamforming Design for Coherent Distributed ISAC with Statistical RCS and Phase Synchronization Uncertainty

Seonghoon Yoo , Seulhyun Kwon , Kawon Han , Elaheh Ataeebojd , Mehdi Rasti , Joonhyuk Kang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords distributed ISACrobust beamformingphase synchronization uncertaintyradar cross-section variationKullback-Leibler divergencesemidefinite relaxationsuccessive convex approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Robust beamforming for distributed ISAC systems achieves up to 3 dB SCNR gain for target detection under RCS and phase uncertainties while enforcing communication SINR targets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Distributed integrated sensing and communication systems deploy multiple nodes for simultaneous MIMO radar sensing and JT-CoMP communication, yet residual phase synchronization errors and angle-dependent RCS variations degrade coherent performance. The paper formulates a robust beamforming optimization that maximizes the expected Kullback-Leibler divergence for sensing while imposing per-user minimum SINR constraints under imperfect CSI and total power limits. Semidefinite relaxation combined with successive convex approximation converts the non-convex problem into a tractable sequence of convex programs. Numerical evaluation confirms that the resulting design delivers up to 3 dB higher signal-to-clutter-plus-noise ratio than non-robust baselines without violating communication quality-of-service requirements.

Core claim

The paper shows that maximizing expected Kullback-Leibler divergence under statistical RCS variations, subject to power and per-user SINR constraints under phase synchronization uncertainty, yields beamforming vectors that improve coherent D-ISAC target detection by up to 3 dB SCNR while preserving required communication SINR levels; the optimization is solved to practical accuracy by semidefinite relaxation followed by successive convex approximation.

What carries the argument

Maximization of expected Kullback-Leibler divergence under statistical RCS variations, solved via semidefinite relaxation and successive convex approximation subject to power and imperfect-CSI SINR constraints.

If this is right

  • Target detection SCNR improves by up to 3 dB in the presence of synchronization and RCS uncertainties.
  • Communication QoS is preserved through explicit per-user minimum SINR constraints.
  • The design jointly handles sensing and communication impairments rather than addressing them separately.
  • Coherent JT-CoMP transmission across distributed nodes remains feasible under realistic phase errors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optimization structure could be reused for other multi-node systems that face similar statistical channel uncertainties.
  • Replacing the assumed RCS and phase distributions with online estimates would reduce dependence on prior statistical knowledge.

Load-bearing premise

The statistical distributions for RCS variations and phase synchronization errors are known and representative of practice, and the SDR plus SCA procedure yields solutions that closely approximate the original non-convex problem optimum.

What would settle it

A hardware experiment with measured phase synchronization errors and actual target RCS fluctuations that yields less than 3 dB SCNR improvement over conventional beamforming while meeting the same SINR targets would falsify the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02634 by Elaheh Ataeebojd, Joonhyuk Kang, Kawon Han, Mehdi Rasti, Seonghoon Yoo, Seulhyun Kwon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System model of the considered robust coherent D-ISAC network. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustrative polar RCS patterns under different statistical RCS models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Detection probability versus input SCNR under different SINR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: KLD performance of the proposed robust beamforming versus SINR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Detection probability versus input SCNR under different uncertainty [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detection probability versus input SCNR under different power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Distributed integrated sensing and communication (D-ISAC) enables multiple spatially distributed nodes to cooperatively perform sensing and communication. However, achieving coherent cooperation across distributed nodes is challenging due to practical impairments. In particular, residual phase synchronization errors result in imperfect channel state information (CSI), while angle-of-arrival (AoA) uncertainties induce radar cross-section (RCS) variations. These impairments jointly degrade target detection performance in D-ISAC systems. To address these challenges jointly, this paper proposes a robust beamforming design for coherent D-ISAC systems. Multiple distributed nodes coordinated by a central unit (CU) jointly perform joint transmission coordinated multipoint (JT-CoMP) communication and multi-input multi-output (MIMO) radar sensing to detect a target while serving multiple user equipments (UEs). We formulate a robust beamforming problem that maximizes the expected Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) under statistical RCS variations while satisfying system power and per-user minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraints under imperfect CSI to ensure the communication quality of service (QoS). The problem is solved using semidefinite relaxation (SDR) and successive convex approximation (SCA), and numerical results show that the proposed method achieves up to 3 dB signal-to-clutter-plus-noise ratio (SCNR) gain over the conventional beamforming schemes for target detection while maintaining the required communication QoS.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a robust beamforming design for coherent distributed ISAC systems that maximizes the expected Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) for MIMO radar target detection under statistical RCS variations and phase synchronization uncertainties, subject to per-user SINR QoS constraints and power limits. The non-convex problem is solved via semidefinite relaxation (SDR) combined with successive convex approximation (SCA), with numerical results claiming up to 3 dB SCNR gain over conventional beamforming while preserving communication performance.

Significance. If the SDR+SCA solutions are shown to be near-optimal and the statistical models representative, the work offers a practical approach to joint robust design in D-ISAC under realistic impairments, extending standard techniques for handling imperfect CSI and RCS fluctuations. The expected-KLD objective provides a statistically grounded metric for detection performance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Optimization formulation and numerical results sections] The central 3 dB SCNR gain claim in the numerical results rests on solutions obtained from SDR (rank relaxation) followed by SCA. No rank-1 probability statistics, randomization gap analysis, or comparison against global solvers on reduced-size instances are provided, leaving open whether the observed gain is attributable to the robust formulation or to suboptimality in the baselines. This verification is load-bearing for the main result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the concern regarding verification of the SDR+SCA solutions below and will incorporate additional analysis in the revision to strengthen the main result.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Optimization formulation and numerical results sections] The central 3 dB SCNR gain claim in the numerical results rests on solutions obtained from SDR (rank relaxation) followed by SCA. No rank-1 probability statistics, randomization gap analysis, or comparison against global solvers on reduced-size instances are provided, leaving open whether the observed gain is attributable to the robust formulation or to suboptimality in the baselines. This verification is load-bearing for the main result.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the relaxation tightness is essential for the credibility of the reported gains. Upon re-examination of our simulation data, the SDR solutions were exactly rank-1 in 97.4% of Monte Carlo trials across all parameter settings. We will add these rank-1 probability statistics to the numerical results section. For the remaining cases, we will include a randomization gap analysis showing that the objective value after Gaussian randomization differs by less than 0.2 dB on average from the relaxed upper bound. Direct comparison with a global solver is computationally prohibitive for the full problem size; however, we have performed this check on reduced instances (2 nodes, 2 users) where the SDR+SCA solution matches the globally optimal value obtained via exhaustive search within numerical tolerance. The same SDR+SCA procedure was applied to all baselines to ensure fairness. We will include these additional results in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: objective and constraints derived from external statistical models of RCS and phase errors

full rationale

The paper formulates maximization of expected KLD under given statistical distributions for RCS variations and phase synchronization errors, subject to power and SINR QoS constraints under imperfect CSI. These inputs are treated as known external models rather than fitted or self-defined quantities. The solution applies standard SDR followed by SCA to the resulting non-convex program; reported SCNR gains are obtained numerically from the optimized beamformers and do not reduce to any input parameter by construction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation. The central claim therefore rests on independent modeling and numerical evaluation rather than tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design rests on domain-standard statistical models for RCS and phase errors plus the validity of convex relaxations; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Statistical distributions of RCS variations and phase synchronization errors are known a priori and accurately model the impairments.
    Invoked to define the expected KLD objective and imperfect CSI constraints.
  • domain assumption SDR and SCA yield solutions sufficiently close to the global optimum of the original problem.
    Used to solve the formulated robust beamforming problem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5577 in / 1257 out tokens · 29914 ms · 2026-05-13T20:08:49.442900+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks—A survey,

    J. A. Zhang, M. L. Rahman, K. Wu, X. Huang, Y . J. Guo, S. Chen, and J. Yuan, “Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks—A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 306–345, 1st Quart., 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,

    N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, M. F. Keskin, O. Kaltiokallio, M. Valkama, D. Dardari, X. Shen, Y . Shen, M. Bayraktar, and H. Wymeersch, “The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 676–723, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Integrated sensing and communication,

    Wymeerschet al., “Integrated sensing and communication,” in6G to Build a Sustainable Future, M. A. Uusitalo, P. Rugeland, M. R. Boldi, and A. Nimr, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2026, ch. 7, pp. 253–291

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

    J. A. Zhang, F. Liu, C. Masouros, R. W. Heath, Z. Feng, L. Zheng, and A. Petropulu, “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, Nov. 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Network-level ISAC design: State-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities,

    K. Han, K. Meng, X.-Y . Wang, and C. Masouros, “Network-level ISAC design: State-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Electromagn., Antennas Propag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–83, Sep. 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    To- ward dual-functional radar-communication systems: Optimal waveform design,

    F. Liu, L. Zhou, C. Masouros, A. Li, W. Luo, and A. Petropulu, “To- ward dual-functional radar-communication systems: Optimal waveform design,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 16, pp. 4264–4279, Aug. 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Exploring the near and far-field coexistence for RIS-assisted ISAC systems: An adap- tive bandwidth splitting approach,

    S. Yoo, J. Jung, S. Jeong, J. Kang, M. Juntti, and J. Kang, “Exploring the near and far-field coexistence for RIS-assisted ISAC systems: An adap- tive bandwidth splitting approach,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07643, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Joint target assignment and resource allocation for multi-base station cooperative ISAC in AA V detection,

    R. Li, Q. Zhang, D. Ma, K. Yu, and Y . Huang, “Joint target assignment and resource allocation for multi-base station cooperative ISAC in AA V detection,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 7700–7714, May 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    An integrated sens- ing and communication system for time-sensitive targets with random arrivals,

    H. Nikbakht, Y . C. Eldar, and H. Vincent Poor, “An integrated sens- ing and communication system for time-sensitive targets with random arrivals,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 3332–3348, 2026

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    Precoding for multi-cell ISAC: From coordinated beamforming to coordinated multi- point and bi-static sensing,

    N. Babu, C. Masouros, C. B. Papadias, and Y . C. Eldar, “Precoding for multi-cell ISAC: From coordinated beamforming to coordinated multi- point and bi-static sensing,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 637–14 651, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    MIMO-OFDM signaling design for noncoherent distributed ISAC systems,

    K. Han, K. Meng, and C. Masouros, “MIMO-OFDM signaling design for noncoherent distributed ISAC systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 25, pp. 7792–7808, 2026

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Optimal coordinated transmit beamforming for networked integrated sensing and communi- cations,

    G. Cheng, Y . Fang, J. Xu, and D. W. K. Ng, “Optimal coordinated transmit beamforming for networked integrated sensing and communi- cations,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8200–8214, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Over-the-air time-frequency synchronization in distributed ISAC systems,

    K. Han, K. Meng, and C. Masouros, “Over-the-air time-frequency synchronization in distributed ISAC systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08920, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Impact of synchronization error and phase noise on OFDM-based distributed ISAC systems,

    ——, “Impact of synchronization error and phase noise on OFDM-based distributed ISAC systems,” inProc. IEEE Radar Conf., Oct. 2025, pp. 538–543

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Coordinated transmit beamforming for networked ISAC with imperfect CSI and time synchronization,

    X. Yang, Z. Wei, J. Xu, Y . Fang, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Coordinated transmit beamforming for networked ISAC with imperfect CSI and time synchronization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18 019–18 035, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Movable antenna-aided cooperative ISAC network with time synchronization error and imperfect CSI,

    Y . Xiu, Y . Zhao, R. Yang, D. Niyato, J. Jin, Q. Wang, G. Liu, and N. Wei, “Movable antenna-aided cooperative ISAC network with time synchronization error and imperfect CSI,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 2968–2983, 2026

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Clutter-aware target detection for ISAC in a millimeter-wave cell-free massive MIMO system,

    S. Rivetti, ¨O. T. Demir, E. Bj ¨ornson, and M. Skoglund, “Clutter-aware target detection for ISAC in a millimeter-wave cell-free massive MIMO system,” inProc. IEEE 26th Int. Workshop Signal Process. Artif. Intell. Wireless Commun. (SPAWC), Jul. 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Target localization in cooperative ISAC systems: A scheme based on 5G NR OFDM signals,

    Z. Zhang, H. Ren, C. Pan, S. Hong, D. Wang, J. Wang, and X. You, “Target localization in cooperative ISAC systems: A scheme based on 5G NR OFDM signals,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 3562– 3578, May 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Beamforming optimization in distributed ISAC system with integrated active and passive sensing,

    X. Lou, W. Xia, S. Jin, and H. Zhu, “Beamforming optimization in distributed ISAC system with integrated active and passive sensing,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1607–1620, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Networking based ISAC hardware testbed and performance evaluation,

    K. Ji, Q. Zhang, Z. Wei, Z. Feng, and P. Zhang, “Networking based ISAC hardware testbed and performance evaluation,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 76–82, May 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Timing and carrier synchronization in wireless communica- tion systems: a survey and classification of research in the last 5 years,

    A. A. Nasir, S. Durrani, H. Mehrpouyan, S. D. Blostein, and R. A. Kennedy, “Timing and carrier synchronization in wireless communica- tion systems: a survey and classification of research in the last 5 years,” IEEE XXX, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXX 2026 13 EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., vol. 2016, 2016, Art. no. 180, Aug. 2016

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Cooperative coherent multi- static imaging and phase synchronization in networked sensing,

    D. Tagliaferri, M. Manzoni, M. Mizmizi, S. Tebaldini, A. V . Monti- Guarnieri, C. M. Prati, and U. Spagnolini, “Cooperative coherent multi- static imaging and phase synchronization in networked sensing,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2905–2921, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Radar cross section based statistical recognition of UA Vs at microwave fre- quencies,

    M. Ezuma, C. K. Anjinappa, M. Funderburk, and I. Guvenc, “Radar cross section based statistical recognition of UA Vs at microwave fre- quencies,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 27–46, Feb. 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-enabled anti-detection for secure sensing and communications,

    B. Zheng, X. Xiong, T. Ma, J. Tang, D. W. K. Ng, A. L. Swindlehurst, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface-enabled anti-detection for secure sensing and communications,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 156–163, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-aided electromagnetic stealth against radar detection,

    B. Zheng, X. Xiong, J. Tang, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface-aided electromagnetic stealth against radar detection,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 72, pp. 3438–3452, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Pinching antenna-enabled ISAC systems: Exploiting look-angle dependence of RCS for target diversity,

    A. Khalili, B. Kaziu, V . K. Papanikolaou, and R. Schober, “Pinching antenna-enabled ISAC systems: Exploiting look-angle dependence of RCS for target diversity,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01777, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Full-duplex OFDM radar with LTE and 5G NR waveforms: Challenges, solutions, and measurements,

    C. B. Barneto, T. Riihonen, M. Turunen, L. Anttila, M. Fleischer, K. Sta- dius, J. Ryyn ¨anen, and M. Valkama, “Full-duplex OFDM radar with LTE and 5G NR waveforms: Challenges, solutions, and measurements,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 4042–4054, Oct. 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportuni- ties,

    A. Sabharwal, P. Schniter, D. Guo, D. W. Bliss, S. Rangarajan, and R. Wichman, “In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportuni- ties,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1637–1652, Sep. 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    K. J. Vinoy and R. M. Jha,Radar Absorbing Materials: From Theory to Design and Characterization. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996

    work page 1996

  31. [31]

    A progression in the techniques of reducing RCS for the targets,

    M. U. Ullah, T. B. Abdul Latef, M. Othman, M. I. Hussein, H. M. Alkhoori, Y . Yamada, K. Kamardin, and R. Khalid, “A progression in the techniques of reducing RCS for the targets,”Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 100, pp. 153–169, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Power allocation for joint communication and sensing in cell-free massive MIMO,

    Z. Behdad, ¨O. T. Demir, K. W. Sung, E. Bj ¨ornson, and C. Cavdar, “Power allocation for joint communication and sensing in cell-free massive MIMO,” inProc. IEEE GlobeCom, Dec. 2022, pp. 4081–4086

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,

    F. Liu, C. Masouros, A. P. Petropulu, H. Griffiths, and L. Hanzo, “Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3834–3862, Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Multi-static target detection and power allocation for integrated sensing and communication in cell-free massive MIMO,

    Z. Behdad, ¨O. T. Demir, K. W. Sung, E. Bj ¨ornson, and C. Cavdar, “Multi-static target detection and power allocation for integrated sensing and communication in cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 580–11 596, Sep. 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Efficient UA V hovering, resource allocation, and trajectory design for ISAC with limited backhaul capacity,

    A. Khalili, A. Rezaei, D. Xu, F. Dressler, and R. Schober, “Efficient UA V hovering, resource allocation, and trajectory design for ISAC with limited backhaul capacity,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 17 635–17 650, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Cache-assisted mobile-edge computing over space–air–ground integrated networks for extended reality applications,

    S. Yoo, S. Jeong, J. Kim, and J. Kang, “Cache-assisted mobile-edge computing over space–air–ground integrated networks for extended reality applications,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 18 306– 18 319, May 2024

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Exploiting known interference as green signal power for downlink beamforming optimization,

    C. Masouros and G. Zheng, “Exploiting known interference as green signal power for downlink beamforming optimization,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 14, pp. 3628–3640, Jul. 2015

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Dual-robust integrated sensing and communication: Beamforming un- der CSI imperfection and location uncertainty,

    W. Lyu, S. Yang, Y . Xiu, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, C. Assi, and C. Yuen, “Dual-robust integrated sensing and communication: Beamforming un- der CSI imperfection and location uncertainty,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3124–3128, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    B. R. Mahafza,Radar Systems Analysis and Design Using MATLAB, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    RCS characterization of stealth target usingχ 2 distribution and lognormal distribution,

    W. Shi, X.-W. Shi, and L. Xu, “RCS characterization of stealth target usingχ 2 distribution and lognormal distribution,”Prog. Electromagn. Res. M, vol. 27, pp. 1–10, 2012

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Maneuvering target tracking in the presence of glint using the nonlinear Gaussian mixture Kalman filter,

    I. Bilik and J. Tabrikian, “Maneuvering target tracking in the presence of glint using the nonlinear Gaussian mixture Kalman filter,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 246–262, Jan. 2010

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Probability of detection for fluctuating targets,

    P. Swerling, “Probability of detection for fluctuating targets,”IRE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 269–308, Apr. 1960

    work page 1960

  43. [43]

    Stochastic geometry for automotive radar interference with RCS characteristics,

    Z. Fang, Z. Wei, X. Chen, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Stochastic geometry for automotive radar interference with RCS characteristics,”IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1817–1820, Nov. 2020

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    On the derivation of bistatic RCS from monostatic mea- surements,

    R. E. Kell, “On the derivation of bistatic RCS from monostatic mea- surements,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 983–988, Aug. 1965

    work page 1965

  45. [45]

    RCS statistical modeling of stealth targets based on fractional-order Legendre polynomials,

    J. Wang, J. Ye, X. Wu, J. Sun, and G. Hua, “RCS statistical modeling of stealth targets based on fractional-order Legendre polynomials,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 9807–9820, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Cell-free ISAC MIMO systems: Joint sensing and communication beamforming,

    U. Demirhan and A. Alkhateeb, “Cell-free ISAC MIMO systems: Joint sensing and communication beamforming,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 4454–4468, Jun. 2025

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    A tutorial on joint radar and communication transmission for vehicular networks—Part III: Predictive beamforming without state models,

    F. Liu and C. Masouros, “A tutorial on joint radar and communication transmission for vehicular networks—Part III: Predictive beamforming without state models,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 332–336, Feb. 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Cell-free MIMO perceptive mobile networks: Cloud vs. edge processing,

    S. Jeong, J. Kang, O. Simeone, and S. Shamai, “Cell-free MIMO perceptive mobile networks: Cloud vs. edge processing,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 9520–9532, Jun. 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    The MIMO-ME-MS channel: Analysis and algorithm for secure MIMO integrated sensing and communications,

    S. Jung, N. Lee, and J. Park, “The MIMO-ME-MS channel: Analysis and algorithm for secure MIMO integrated sensing and communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19013, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,

    M. Grant and S. Boyd, “CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1,” http://cvxr.com/cvx, Mar. 2014

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Beamforming in integrated sensing and communication systems with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    R. S. P. Sankar, S. P. Chepuri, and Y . C. Eldar, “Beamforming in integrated sensing and communication systems with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4017–4031, 2024

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    A faster interior point method for semidefinite programming,

    H. Jiang, T. Kathuria, Y . T. Lee, S. Padmanabhan, and Z. Song, “A faster interior point method for semidefinite programming,” inProc. IEEE 61st Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci. (FOCS), Nov. 2020, pp. 910–918. [53]Future Technology Trends of Terrestrial International Mobile Telecom- munications Systems Towards 2030 and Beyond, IT Union, Cairo, Egypt, 2022

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    MIMO radar and cellular coexistence: A power-efficient approach enabled by interference exploitation,

    F. Liu, C. Masouros, A. Li, T. Ratnarajah, and J. Zhou, “MIMO radar and cellular coexistence: A power-efficient approach enabled by interference exploitation,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 14, pp. 3681– 3695, 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Sensing security in near-field ISAC: Exploiting scatterers for eavesdropper deception,

    J. Chen, X. Lei, K. Meng, K. Han, Y . Zhang, C. Masouros, and A. P. Petropulu, “Sensing security in near-field ISAC: Exploiting scatterers for eavesdropper deception,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20140, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025