pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02820 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 💻 cs.RO

MFE: A Multimodal Hand Exoskeleton with Interactive Force, Pressure and Thermo-haptic Feedback

Ziyuan Tang , Yitian Guo , Chenxi Xiao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords multimodal haptic feedbackhand exoskeletonteleoperationforce feedbackthermal feedbacktactile actuatorsrobotic manipulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hand exoskeleton integrates force, pressure and thermal feedback to enhance robotic teleoperation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the Multimodal Feedback Exoskeleton (MFE) that combines three types of haptic feedback in a single wearable device for the hand. It captures hand movements with 20 degrees of freedom while delivering pushing and pulling forces, fingertip pressure and vibration, and controlled temperatures. This setup is tested in a teleoperation system where users manipulate objects and sense their properties remotely, showing improved ability to recognize deformable items and temperature variations.

Core claim

The MFE is a hand exoskeleton with 20 degrees of freedom that provides hybrid haptic feedback through an active force mechanism generating 3.5 to 8.1 N, electro-osmotic actuators delivering up to 2.47 kPa pressure and vibrations at the fingertips, and thermoelectric heat pumps rendering temperatures between 10 and 55 degrees Celsius. Integration into a robotic teleoperation setup with the X-Arm 6 and Inspire Hand allowed users in studies to successfully identify and handle objects with varying deformability and temperatures.

What carries the argument

The Multimodal Feedback Exoskeleton (MFE) that uses active force actuators, electro-osmotic pressure and vibration modules, and thermoelectric thermal pumps to deliver combined sensations.

Load-bearing premise

The force, pressure, and thermal feedback systems can function at the same time without one affecting the others, and users can interpret the mixed signals correctly.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that users cannot reliably identify object temperatures or deformability when all feedback modes are active simultaneously.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02820 by Chenxi Xiao, Yitian Guo, Ziyuan Tang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our exoskeleton is capable of capturing finger positions and rendering remote contact force, fingertip pressure, and palm temperature. data capture interfaces, such as exoskeletons, have improved teleoperation performance in both the efficiency and quality of data acquisition [5], [6]. Across all these applications, the need for intuitive and immersive control interfaces for robots is becoming increasingly… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Technical pipeline for the MFE multimodal teleoperation system, encompassing the exoskeleton for finger’s positional and force feedback, microfludic actuators for fingertip pressure rendering, thermoelectric module for temperature feedback [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: MFE Exoskeleton: (A) structures, (B) canonical design, and (C) motion capture with additional joint encoders. The actuators operate in torque control mode, enabling force feedback by specifying motor current, which allows them to apply the desired pushing or pulling force on the fingertips. Efficient force transmission from the remote robot to the user is achieved through a linkage mechanism. Compared to r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Microfluidic Actuator. (A) Exploded view, (B) Com￾plete assembly, (C) Components, (D) Working principle. and MX1.25 terminal, considering the deformability required for connection. The total weight for canonical design is 315 grams, and the version with additional joint encoders is 348 grams (both include the weight of thermoelectric module). B. Microfluidic Actuators for Fingertip Feedback To enhance MFE’… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (A) Characterization of pulling force at finger’s resting pose. Characterization of (B) maximum force, and (C) deformation distance generated by microfluid actuator (at 50, 100, 150, and 200 V, respectively). (D) Characterization of surface temperature of thermoelectric module (at +1, +3, +5, -1, -3, -5 V, respectively) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental setup for (A) Task 1: distinguishing objects by shape and material stiffness, (B) Task 2: grasping a deformable cup filled with granular objects, and (C) Task 3: distinguishing temperatures of three cups of water. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Performance of 10 human subjects in manipulating cups with granular objects (Task 2), and statistical test results. Task 3: Temperature Recognition. The effectiveness of our temperature feedback framework was evaluated through two temperature recognition experiments. First, participants were asked to remotely rank three cups of water in order of temperature from highest to lowest. The temperatures of the c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in virtual reality and robotic teleoperation have greatly increased the variety of haptic information that must be conveyed to users. While existing haptic devices typically provide unimodal feedback to enhance situational awareness, a gap remains in their ability to deliver rich, multimodal sensory feedback encompassing force, pressure, and thermal sensations. To address this limitation, we present the Multimodal Feedback Exoskeleton (MFE), a hand exoskeleton designed to deliver hybrid haptic feedback. The MFE features 20 degrees of freedom for capturing hand pose. For force feedback, it employs an active mechanism capable of generating 3.5-8.1 N of pushing and pulling forces at the fingers' resting pose, enabling realistic interaction with deformable objects. The fingertips are equipped with flat actuators based on the electro-osmotic principle, providing pressure and vibration stimuli and achieving up to 2.47 kPa of contact pressure to render tactile sensations. For thermal feedback, the MFE integrates thermoelectric heat pumps capable of rendering temperatures from 10 to 55 degrees Celsius. We validated the MFE by integrating it into a robotic teleoperation system using the X-Arm 6 and Inspire Hand manipulator. In user studies, participants successfully recognized and manipulated deformable objects and differentiated remote objects with varying temperatures. These results demonstrate that the MFE enhances situational awareness, as well as the usability and transparency of robotic teleoperation systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents the Multimodal Feedback Exoskeleton (MFE), a hand exoskeleton with 20 DoF for pose capture that integrates active force feedback (3.5-8.1 N push/pull at resting pose), electro-osmotic flat actuators for pressure/vibration (up to 2.47 kPa), and thermoelectric heat pumps for thermal feedback (10-55°C). It describes integration with the X-Arm 6 and Inspire Hand for teleoperation and reports user studies in which participants successfully recognized deformable objects and differentiated remote object temperatures.

Significance. If the multimodal actuators can operate concurrently without mechanical, thermal, or perceptual interference, the MFE would represent a concrete advance in hybrid haptic interfaces for teleoperation and VR, addressing the gap between unimodal devices and rich sensory feedback. The explicit actuator performance numbers and basic validation through object/temperature recognition tasks provide a useful hardware reference point for the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claims of successful object recognition and temperature differentiation in user studies are presented without error bars, statistical tests, participant counts, success rates, or comparison to unimodal baselines, leaving the central validation of enhanced situational awareness only partially supported.
  2. [Validation / User Studies] Validation / User Studies: No quantitative data, power budgets, response curves, or interference measurements are provided for simultaneous operation of the force, electro-osmotic, and thermoelectric actuators on the same fingertip, despite this being required for the multimodal feedback claim and the weakest assumption identified in the work.
  3. [Methods] Methods: Full experimental protocols for the user studies (including how multimodal stimuli were delivered, task instructions, and any assessment of cross-modal confusion) are absent, preventing evaluation of whether users could reliably parse combined sensations as asserted.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The force range 3.5-8.1 N is stated without clarifying whether it varies by finger, actuator configuration, or measurement condition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will implement to strengthen the presentation of our results and methods.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claims of successful object recognition and temperature differentiation in user studies are presented without error bars, statistical tests, participant counts, success rates, or comparison to unimodal baselines, leaving the central validation of enhanced situational awareness only partially supported.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including key quantitative details. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to report the number of participants, success rates for object recognition and temperature differentiation tasks, and a brief statement that statistical tests confirmed significant differences from chance. Full error bars, p-values, and any unimodal baseline comparisons will be retained and expanded in the Results section due to abstract length limits. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Validation / User Studies] Validation / User Studies: No quantitative data, power budgets, response curves, or interference measurements are provided for simultaneous operation of the force, electro-osmotic, and thermoelectric actuators on the same fingertip, despite this being required for the multimodal feedback claim and the weakest assumption identified in the work.

    Authors: We acknowledge this gap in the current validation. The revised manuscript will add power budget figures and individual actuator response curves from our characterization tests. For concurrent operation we will include the available integration-test data on combined power draw and any measured mechanical or thermal crosstalk; where full perceptual interference data are not yet available we will explicitly note this as a limitation and describe planned follow-up experiments. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Methods] Methods: Full experimental protocols for the user studies (including how multimodal stimuli were delivered, task instructions, and any assessment of cross-modal confusion) are absent, preventing evaluation of whether users could reliably parse combined sensations as asserted.

    Authors: We will substantially expand the Methods section to include complete experimental protocols: precise timing and intensity parameters for delivering combined force-pressure-thermal stimuli, verbatim task instructions provided to participants, and any post-trial questionnaires or observations used to assess cross-modal confusion or perceptual interference. This additional detail will allow readers to evaluate the reliability of the multimodal feedback. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hardware description with empirical measurements

full rationale

The paper presents a physical exoskeleton design and reports measured performance values (force ranges, pressure, temperature) obtained from component specifications and user studies. There are no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citation chains that reduce any claim to its own inputs by construction. The central claims rest on direct engineering integration and experimental validation rather than any self-referential logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design rests on established engineering principles for actuators and thermal elements with no new free parameters, axioms beyond standard assumptions, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Electro-osmotic actuators and thermoelectric pumps perform as specified when integrated into a wearable exoskeleton without mutual interference.
    Invoked implicitly when claiming simultaneous multimodal feedback delivery.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1393 out tokens · 53355 ms · 2026-05-13T20:03:27.431362+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A shared autonomy reconfigurable control framework for telemanipulation of multi-arm systems,

    I. Ozdamar, M. Laghi, G. Grioli, A. Ajoudani, M. G. Catalano, and A. Bicchi, “A shared autonomy reconfigurable control framework for telemanipulation of multi-arm systems,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 9937–9944, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Haptic feedback and force- based teleoperation in surgical robotics,

    R. V . Patel, S. F. Atashzar, and M. Tavakoli, “Haptic feedback and force- based teleoperation in surgical robotics,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 1012–1027, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Tactile and chemical sensing with haptic feedback for a telepresence explosive ordnance disposal robot,

    C. Xiao, A. B. Woeppel, G. M. Clepper, S. Gao, S. Xu, J. F. Rueschen, D. Kruse, W. Wu, H. Z. Tan, T. Lowet al., “Tactile and chemical sensing with haptic feedback for a telepresence explosive ordnance disposal robot,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 3368–3381, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Human-agent joint learning for efficient robot manipulation skill acquisition,

    S. Luo, Q. Peng, J. Lv, K. Hong, K. R. Driggs–Campbell, C. Lu, and Y . Li, “Human-agent joint learning for efficient robot manipulation skill acquisition,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2025, pp. 1370–1377

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Open- television: Teleoperation with immersive active visual feedback,

    X. Cheng, J. Li, S. Yang, G. Yang, and X. Wang, “Open- television: Teleoperation with immersive active visual feedback,” in 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=Yce2jeILGt

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Humanft: A human-like fingertip multimodal visuo-tactile sensor,

    Y . Wu, Y . Chen, Z. Zhu, X. Qin, and C. Xiao, “Humanft: A human-like fingertip multimodal visuo-tactile sensor,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2025, pp. 244–250

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    A review on teleoperation of mobile ground robots: Architecture and situation awareness,

    S. Opiyo, J. Zhou, E. Mwangi, W. Kai, and I. Sunusi, “A review on teleoperation of mobile ground robots: Architecture and situation awareness,”International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 19, pp. 1384–1407, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Situation awareness and attention allocation measures for quantifying telepresence experiences in teleoperation,

    J. M. Riley, D. B. Kaber, and J. V . Draper, “Situation awareness and attention allocation measures for quantifying telepresence experiences in teleoperation,”Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 2004

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    The impact of haptic feedback quality on the performance of teleoperated assembly tasks,

    J. G. Wildenbeest, D. A. Abbink, C. J. Heemskerk, F. C. van der Helm, and H. Boessenkool, “The impact of haptic feedback quality on the performance of teleoperated assembly tasks,”IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 242–252, 2013

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Bio- inspired grasping controller for sensorized 2-dof grippers,

    L. Lach, S. Lemaignan, F. Ferro, H. Ritter, and R. Haschke, “Bio- inspired grasping controller for sensorized 2-dof grippers,” in2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 11 231–11 237

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    The critical tech- nologies of vascular interventional robotic catheterization: A review,

    B. Ren, Y . Zhao, J. Zhang, H. Li, K. Li, and J. Zhang, “The critical tech- nologies of vascular interventional robotic catheterization: A review,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 30 051–30 069, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Bimanual telemanipulation with force and haptic feedback and predictive limit avoidance,

    C. Lenz and S. Behnke, “Bimanual telemanipulation with force and haptic feedback and predictive limit avoidance,” in2021 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), 2021, pp. 1–7

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Multimodal zero- shot learning for tactile texture recognition,

    G. Cao, J. Jiang, D. Bollegala, M. Li, and S. Luo, “Multimodal zero- shot learning for tactile texture recognition,”Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 176, p. 104688, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Objectfolder 2.0: A multisensory object dataset for sim2real transfer,

    R. Gao, Z. Si, Y .-Y . Chang, S. Clarke, J. Bohg, L. Fei-Fei, W. Yuan, and J. Wu, “Objectfolder 2.0: A multisensory object dataset for sim2real transfer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 10 598–10 608

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Demonstrating RFUniverse: A Multiphysics Simulation Platform for Embodied AI,

    H. Fu, W. Xu, R. Ye, H. Xue, Z. Yu, T. Tang, Y . Li, W. Du, J. Zhang, and C. Lu, “Demonstrating RFUniverse: A Multiphysics Simulation Platform for Embodied AI,” inProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Haptix: Vibrotactile haptic feedback for communication of 3d directional cues,

    M. Pascher, T. Franzen, K. Kronhardt, U. Gruenefeld, S. Schneegass, and J. Gerken, “Haptix: Vibrotactile haptic feedback for communication of 3d directional cues,” inExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI EA ’23. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Senseglove: Haptic force-feedback gloves for vr and robotics,

    iCub Humanoid Robot Company, “Senseglove: Haptic force-feedback gloves for vr and robotics,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //www.senseglove.com/

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Analysis of suture manipulation forces for teleoperation with force feedback,

    M. Kitagawa, A. M. Okamura, B. T. Bethea, V . L. Gott, and W. A. Baumgartner, “Analysis of suture manipulation forces for teleoperation with force feedback,” inMedical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2002: 5th International Conference Tokyo, Japan, September 25–28, 2002 Proceedings, Part I 5. Springer, 2002, pp. 155–162

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Bilateral robot teleoperation: A wearable arm exoskeleton featuring an intuitive user interface,

    J. Rebelo, T. Sednaoui, E. B. Den Exter, T. Krueger, and A. Schiele, “Bilateral robot teleoperation: A wearable arm exoskeleton featuring an intuitive user interface,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 62–69, 2014

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Fingers see things differently (fist-d): An object aware visualization and manipulation framework based on tactile observations,

    C. Xiao, N. Madapana, and J. Wachs, “Fingers see things differently (fist-d): An object aware visualization and manipulation framework based on tactile observations,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4249–4256, 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Haptiknit: Distributed stiffness knitting for wearable haptics,

    C. du Pasquier, L. Tessmer, I. Scholl, L. Tilton, T. Chen, S. Tibbits, and A. Okamura, “Haptiknit: Distributed stiffness knitting for wearable haptics,”Science Robotics, vol. 9, no. 97, p. eado3887, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    A soft robotic haptic feedback glove for colonoscopy procedures,

    A. Gerald, R. Batliwala, J. Ye, P. Hsu, H. Aihara, and S. Russo, “A soft robotic haptic feedback glove for colonoscopy procedures,” in2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 583–590

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Fluid reality: High-resolution, untethered haptic gloves using electroosmotic pump arrays,

    V . Shen, T. Rae-Grant, J. Mullenbach, C. Harrison, and C. Shultz, “Fluid reality: High-resolution, untethered haptic gloves using electroosmotic pump arrays,” inProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2023, pp. 1–20

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Contactless haptic display through magnetic field control,

    X. Lu, Y . Yan, B. Qi, H. Qian, J. Sun, and A. Quigley, “Contactless haptic display through magnetic field control,”IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 328–338, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Feel it on your fingers: dataglove with vibrotactile feedback for virtual reality and telerobotics,

    B. Junput, X. Wei, and L. Jamone, “Feel it on your fingers: dataglove with vibrotactile feedback for virtual reality and telerobotics,” inTo- wards Autonomous Robotic Systems: 20th Annual Conference, TAROS 2019, London, UK, July 3–5, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 20. Springer, 2019, pp. 375–385

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Thermairglove: A pneumatic glove for thermal perception and material identification in virtual reality,

    S. Cai, P. Ke, T. Narumi, and K. Zhu, “Thermairglove: A pneumatic glove for thermal perception and material identification in virtual reality,” in2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). IEEE, 2020, pp. 248–257

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Hydroring: Supporting mixed reality haptics using liquid flow,

    T. Han, F. Anderson, P. Irani, and T. Grossman, “Hydroring: Supporting mixed reality haptics using liquid flow,” inProceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2018, pp. 913–925

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Thermal display glove for interacting with virtual reality,

    S.-W. Kim, S. H. Kim, C. S. Kim, K. Yi, J.-S. Kim, B. J. Cho, and Y . Cha, “Thermal display glove for interacting with virtual reality,” Scientific reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 11403, 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Evaluation of hand-tracking systems in teleoperation and virtual dexterous manipulation,

    C. Mizera, T. Delrieu, V . Weistroffer, C. Andriot, A. Decatoire, and J.- P. Gazeau, “Evaluation of hand-tracking systems in teleoperation and virtual dexterous manipulation,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1642–1655, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    AnyTeleop: A General Vision-Based Dexterous Robot Arm- Hand Teleoperation System,

    Y . Qin, W. Yang, B. Huang, K. V . Wyk, H. Su, X. Wang, Y .-W. Chao, and D. Fox, “AnyTeleop: A General Vision-Based Dexterous Robot Arm- Hand Teleoperation System,” inProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Dexpi- lot: Vision-based teleoperation of dexterous robotic hand-arm system,

    A. Handa, K. Van Wyk, W. Yang, J. Liang, and e. a. Chao, “Dexpi- lot: Vision-based teleoperation of dexterous robotic hand-arm system,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 9164–9170

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Vision-based teleoperation of shadow dexterous hand using end-to-end deep neural network,

    S. Li, X. Ma, H. Liang, M. G ¨orner, P. Ruppel, B. Fang, F. Sun, and J. Zhang, “Vision-based teleoperation of shadow dexterous hand using end-to-end deep neural network,” in2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2019, pp. 416–422

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    icub3 avatar system: Enabling remote fully immersive embodiment of humanoid robots,

    S. Dafarra, U. Pattacini, G. Romualdi, L. Rapetti, R. Grieco, K. Darvish, G. Milani, E. Valli, I. Sorrentino, P. M. Viceconteet al., “icub3 avatar system: Enabling remote fully immersive embodiment of humanoid robots,”Science Robotics, vol. 9, no. 86, p. eadh3834, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Haptx: Advanced haptic technology,

    HaptX Inc., “Haptx: Advanced haptic technology,” 2025, accessed: 2025-02-24. [Online]. Available: https://haptx.com/

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Teleoperation with the shadow robot hand,

    Shadow Robot Company, “Teleoperation with the shadow robot hand,” https://www.shadowrobot.com/teleoperation/, 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Fully screen printed tailorable triboelectric sensing and thermal feedback tapes for exoskeleton based immersive robotic and virtual teleoperation,

    Y . Zhao, J. Yang, Z. Du, M. Liu, X. Li, M. Zhu, and T. Chen, “Fully screen printed tailorable triboelectric sensing and thermal feedback tapes for exoskeleton based immersive robotic and virtual teleoperation,”Nano Energy, vol. 142, p. 111255, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Lucidgloves: Open-source cable-drive haptic gloves for vr,

    LucidVR, “Lucidgloves: Open-source cable-drive haptic gloves for vr,”

    work page

  38. [38]

    Available: https://github.com/LucidVR/lucidgloves

    [Online]. Available: https://github.com/LucidVR/lucidgloves

    work page

  39. [39]

    DOGlove: Dexterous Manipu- lation with a Low-Cost Open-Source Haptic Force Feedback Glove,

    H. Zhang, S. Hu, Z. Yuan, and H. Xu, “DOGlove: Dexterous Manipu- lation with a Low-Cost Open-Source Haptic Force Feedback Glove,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, LosAngeles, CA, USA, June 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Flat panel haptics: Embedded electroosmotic pumps for scalable shape displays,

    C. Shultz and C. Harrison, “Flat panel haptics: Embedded electroosmotic pumps for scalable shape displays,” inProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2023, pp. 1–16

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    An introductory study of common grasps used by adults during perfor- mance of activities of daily living,

    M. Vergara, J. L. Sancho-Bru, V . Gracia-Ib´a˜nez, and A. P´erez-Gonz´alez, “An introductory study of common grasps used by adults during perfor- mance of activities of daily living,”Journal of Hand Therapy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 225–234, 2014

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Tactual discrimination of soft- ness,

    M. A. Srinivasan and R. H. LaMotte, “Tactual discrimination of soft- ness,”Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 1995

    work page 1995