pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02885 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🧮 math.GR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On recognition of simple classical groups with prime graph independence number 4 by spectrum

Maria A. Grechkoseeva, Vladislav M. Rodionov

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.GR MSC 20D06
keywords recognition by spectrumsimple classical groupselement ordersprime graph independence numberalmost simple groups
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite groups with the same element orders as certain classical simple groups are almost simple with that socle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors prove that for the listed simple classical groups with q odd, sharing the set of element orders forces any finite group to be almost simple with the given group as socle. This completes the recognition by spectrum for all simple classical groups where the independence number of the prime graph is 4. Sympathetic readers care because element orders provide a coarse but computable invariant, and knowing when it suffices to identify the group advances the program of spectrum recognition for finite simple groups.

Core claim

We prove that every finite group having the same set of element orders as L is an almost simple group with socle isomorphic to L, where L is one of L_8(q), U_8(q), O_{10}^+(q), O_{10}^-(q) or O_{12}^+(q) with q odd.

What carries the argument

The spectrum of the group, i.e., the set of orders of its elements, which is shown to be unique to almost simple groups with these socles.

Load-bearing premise

That the possible socles for any group with this spectrum are limited to the listed L by the classification of finite simple groups.

What would settle it

A finite group G not almost simple with socle L but with exactly the same set of element orders as L would falsify the result.

read the original abstract

Let $L$ be one of the finite simple classical groups $L_8(q)$, $U_8(q)$, $O_{10}^+(q)$, $O_{10}^-(q)$ or $O_{12}^+(q)$, with $q$ odd. We prove that every finite group having the same set of element orders as $L$ is an almost simple group with socle isomorphic to $L$. This completes the study of the recognition-by-spectrum problem for simple classical groups whose prime graph independence number is equal to $4$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves a recognition-by-spectrum theorem for the finite simple classical groups L equal to L_8(q), U_8(q), O_{10}^+(q), O_{10}^-(q) or O_{12}^+(q) with q odd: any finite group G whose set of element orders coincides with that of L must be almost simple with socle isomorphic to L. The argument proceeds by combining the prime-graph independence number equal to 4 with known results on spectra of classical groups and the classification of finite simple groups to constrain possible socles and rule out all other possibilities.

Significance. If the proof is correct, the result completes the recognition-by-spectrum classification for all simple classical groups whose prime graph has independence number 4, thereby finishing one of the remaining cases in the broader program of characterizing finite simple groups by their spectra. The work is technically grounded in standard tools of the field (prime graphs, element-order sets, and CFSG) and supplies a concrete, falsifiable uniqueness statement.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Lemma 3.5] §3.2, Lemma 3.5: the exclusion of alternating groups as possible socles rests on a comparison of maximal element orders; the argument would be strengthened by an explicit reference to the precise bound used for the largest element order in A_n when n is in the relevant range determined by the spectrum of L.
  2. [§4] §4, the case O_{12}^+(q): the proof that no other classical group of the same dimension can share the spectrum appears to rely on the independence number being exactly 4 to separate the prime-graph components; a short additional sentence clarifying why the same separation does not hold for the excluded groups with independence number 3 would remove any ambiguity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] The notation for the orthogonal groups O_{10}^±(q) and O_{12}^+(q) is standard, but the manuscript occasionally writes O_n^ε(q) without reminding the reader that ε = + or − is fixed by the listed cases; a single sentence in the introduction would improve readability.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 (prime-graph components) lists the independence number as 4 for each L, but does not include a column for the corresponding maximal tori or element orders; adding this would make the subsequent case analysis easier to follow.
  3. [Throughout §3–5] Reference [12] is cited for the spectra of classical groups, but the manuscript does not indicate which specific theorems from that paper are invoked in each case; a parenthetical remark such as “by Theorem 3.4 of [12]” would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive suggestions, which help clarify the arguments. We address both major comments below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3.2, Lemma 3.5] §3.2, Lemma 3.5: the exclusion of alternating groups as possible socles rests on a comparison of maximal element orders; the argument would be strengthened by an explicit reference to the precise bound used for the largest element order in A_n when n is in the relevant range determined by the spectrum of L.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit reference will improve clarity. In the revised version we add a citation to the standard bound on the maximal element order in A_n (specifically, the result that this order is at most the Landau function g(n) with the known estimates for n in the range fixed by the spectrum of L). This makes the comparison fully precise without changing the logic of the proof. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4, the case O_{12}^+(q): the proof that no other classical group of the same dimension can share the spectrum appears to rely on the independence number being exactly 4 to separate the prime-graph components; a short additional sentence clarifying why the same separation does not hold for the excluded groups with independence number 3 would remove any ambiguity.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting this potential source of ambiguity. We will insert one clarifying sentence in Section 4 explaining that, for the classical groups whose prime graphs have independence number 3, the components remain connected in a way that prevents the same separation of candidate socles; this follows directly from the known prime-graph structure for those groups (as classified in the literature). The added sentence removes any ambiguity while leaving the main argument unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper establishes a recognition theorem asserting that any finite group isospectral to one of the listed classical groups L (with q odd) must be almost simple with socle L. The argument relies on standard background results concerning spectra of classical groups together with the classification of finite simple groups to exclude other possible socles. No step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input relabeled as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose justification is internal to the present work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity assessment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on the classification of finite simple groups to restrict possible socles and on prior results about spectra and prime graphs of classical groups; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Classification of finite simple groups
    Used to identify possible socles of groups sharing the spectrum.
  • domain assumption Known spectra and prime graphs of classical groups
    Background facts on element orders in L8(q), U8(q), etc., invoked to perform case analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5390 in / 1269 out tokens · 35706 ms · 2026-05-13T18:36:04.297206+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Recognition by element orders for simple linear and unitary groups

    math.GR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The recognition problem by element orders is solved for every finite simple linear and unitary group.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. S. Bang, Taltheoretiske Undersøgelser,Tidsskrift Math.4(1886), 70–80, 130–137

  2. [2]

    A. A. Buturlakin, Spectra of finite linear and unitary groups,Algebra Logic47(2008), no. 2, 91–99

  3. [3]

    A. A. Buturlakin, Spectra of finite symplectic and orthogonal groups,Siberian Adv. Math.21(2011), no. 3, 176–210

  4. [4]

    A. A. Buturlakin, Spectra of groupsE8(q),Algebra Logic57(2018), no. 1, 1–8

  5. [5]

    J. H. Conway, R. T. Curtis, S. P. Norton, R. A. Parker, and R. A. Wilson, Atlas of finite groups, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985

  6. [6]

    Di Martino and A.E

    L. Di Martino and A.E. Zalesskii, Minimum polynomials and lower bounds for eigenvalue multiplic- ities of prime-power order elements in representations of classical groups,J. Algebra243(2001), no. 1, 228–263; Corrigendum,J. Algebra260(2006), no. 1, 249–252

  7. [7]

    The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.13.1, 2024

  8. [8]

    Gorenstein, Finite groups, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1968

    D. Gorenstein, Finite groups, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1968

  9. [9]

    J.57(2016), no

    M.A.Grechkoseeva, Onspectraofalmostsimplegroupswithsymplecticororthogonalsocle,Siberian Math. J.57(2016), no. 4, 582–588

  10. [10]

    M. A. Grechkoseeva, Recognizability of the groupsP Sp8(7m)by the set of element orders,Math. Motes117(2025), no. 3-4, 538–546. On recognition of simple classical groups18

  11. [11]

    M. A. Grechkoseeva, V. D. Mazurov, W. Shi, A. V. Vasil’ev, and N. Yang, Finite groups isospectral to simple groups,Commun. Math. Stat.11(2023), 169–194

  12. [12]

    M. A. Grechkoseeva and V. V. Panshin, On recognition of low-dimensional linear and unitary groups by spectrum,Siberian Math. J.65(2024), no. 5, 1074–1095

  13. [13]

    M. A. Grechkoseeva and M. A. Zvezdina, On recognition ofL4(q)andU 4(q)by spectrum,Siberian Math. J.61(2020), no. 6, 1039–1065

  14. [14]

    A. S. Kondrat’ev, On prime graph components of finite simple groups,Math. USSR-Sb.67(1990), no. 1, 235–247

  15. [15]

    V. D. Mazurov, Recognition of finite groups by a set of orders of their elements,Algebra Logic37 (1998), no. 6, 371–379

  16. [16]

    Panshin, On recognition of simple groups with disconnected prime graphs by spectrum, 2025, arXiv:2509.03483[math.GR]

    V. Panshin, On recognition of simple groups with disconnected prime graphs by spectrum, 2025, arXiv:2509.03483[math.GR]

  17. [17]

    Roitman, On Zsigmondy primes,Proc

    M. Roitman, On Zsigmondy primes,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.125(1997), no. 7, 1913–1919

  18. [18]

    A. M. Staroletov, On recognition of linear and unitary groups by spectrum,Siberian Math. J., to appear

  19. [19]

    I. D. Suprunenko and A. E. Zalesski, Fixed vectors for elements in modules for algebraic groups,Int. J. Algebra Comput.17(2007), no. 5-6, 1249–1261

  20. [20]

    A. V. Vasil’ev, On connection between the structure of a finite group and the properties of its prime graph,Siberian Math. J.46(2005), no. 3, 396–404

  21. [21]

    A. V. Vasil’ev, On finite groups isospectral to simple classical groups,J. Algebra423(2015), 318–374

  22. [22]

    A. V. Vasil’ev and I. B. Gorshkov, On recognition of finite simple groups with connected prime graph,Siberian Math. J.50(2009), no. 2, 233–238

  23. [23]

    A. V. Vasil’ev, M. A. Grechkoseeva, and V. D. Mazurov, Characterization of the finite simple groups by spectrum and order,Algebra Logic48(2009), no. 6, 385–409

  24. [24]

    A. V. Vasil’ev and E. P. Vdovin, An adjacency criterion for the prime graph of a finite simple group, Algebra Logic44(2005), no. 6, 381–406

  25. [25]

    A. V. Vasil’ev and E. P. Vdovin, Cocliques of maximal size in the prime graph of a finite simple group,Algebra Logic50(2011), no. 4, 291–322

  26. [26]

    J. S. Williams, Prime graph components of finite groups,J. Algebra69(1981), 487–513

  27. [27]

    N. Yang, M. A. Grechkoseeva, and A. V. Vasil’ev, On the nilpotency of the solvable radical of a finite group isospectral to a simple group,J. Group Theory23(2020), no. 3, 447–470

  28. [28]

    A. V. Zavarnitsine, Fixed points of large prime-order elements in the equicharacteristic action of linear and unitary groups,Sib. `Elektron. Mat. Izv.8(2011), 333–340

  29. [29]

    Zsigmondy, Zur Theorie der Potenzreste,Monatsh

    K. Zsigmondy, Zur Theorie der Potenzreste,Monatsh. Math. Phys.3(1892), 265–284. Novosibirsk State University, Pirogov a, 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia; Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Koptyuga 4, Novosibirsk 630090 Email address:grechkoseeva@gmail.com Novosibirsk State University, Pirogov a, 1, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Email address:crowulll@gmail.com