pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02961 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.flu-dyn

Nanomechanical detection of vortices in an electron fluid

Andrey A. Shevyrin , Askhat K. Bakarov , Arthur G. Pogosov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.flu-dyn
keywords nanomechanicselectron vorticeselectron hydrodynamicsviscous fluidmagnetic torqueballistic vorticeshydrodynamic vortices
0
0 comments X

The pith

A circular cavity in a suspended nanomechanical resonator detects electron vortices through magnetic torque vibrations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a nanomechanical method to directly detect vortices in an electron fluid. By integrating a circular cavity into a suspended resonator, the circulating current of the vortex generates a magnetic moment. When an in-plane magnetic field is applied, this moment produces a torque that drives vibrations in the resonator, revealing the vortex. This approach detects both ballistic and hydrodynamic vortices and tracks their crossover with temperature, offering a simpler alternative to indirect transport measurements or complex scanning techniques.

Core claim

By integrating a circular cavity into a suspended resonator, we create a vortex whose circulating current generates a magnetic moment. In an in-plane magnetic field, this moment experiences a torque, driving vibrations that directly reveal the vortex's presence and nature. We detect ballistic and hydrodynamic vortices and trace their temperature-driven crossover. Our work establishes nanomechanics as a platform for electron hydrodynamics, showing that viscosity is one of the dominant factors shaping nanoelectromechanical response.

What carries the argument

The nanomechanical resonator with an integrated circular cavity, where the vortex current's magnetic moment interacts with an in-plane magnetic field to generate detectable torque-driven vibrations.

If this is right

  • Nanomechanics serves as a platform for studying electron hydrodynamics.
  • Viscosity, subtle in transport, becomes dominant in nanoelectromechanical response.
  • The method allows direct detection of ballistic and hydrodynamic vortices and their temperature-driven crossover.
  • Provides an inherently simpler paradigm compared to indirect transport or scanning magnetometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could enable local mapping of viscosity in electron fluids by varying cavity positions.
  • It might be adaptable to probe other collective excitations in 2D electron systems.
  • Integration with existing NEMS devices could lead to hybrid sensors for quantum fluids.

Load-bearing premise

The vibrations observed in the resonator are caused primarily by the magnetic torque from the vortex's circulating current, rather than other forces or effects.

What would settle it

Measuring no correlation between the vibration signal and the expected vortex magnetic moment, or observing similar vibrations in a resonator without the circular cavity.

read the original abstract

Electron vortices are the quintessential signature of a viscous electron fluid. For decades, their detection relied on indirect transport measurements with persistently debated interpretations. Recently, scanning magnetometry enabled direct visualization, yet these techniques demand considerable sophistication. Here we introduce a conceptually different and inherently simpler paradigm based on nanomechanics. By integrating a circular cavity into a suspended resonator, we create a vortex whose circulating current generates a magnetic moment. In an in-plane magnetic field, this moment experiences a torque, driving vibrations that directly reveal the vortex's presence and nature. We detect ballistic and hydrodynamic vortices and trace their temperature-driven crossover. Our work establishes nanomechanics as a platform for electron hydrodynamics, showing that viscosity - subtle in transport - is one of the dominant factors shaping nanoelectromechanical response.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a nanomechanical detection scheme for electron vortices in a viscous fluid by embedding a circular cavity within a suspended resonator. The vortex's circulating current produces a magnetic moment that experiences torque under an applied in-plane magnetic field, inducing measurable vibrations that are used to identify ballistic and hydrodynamic vortex regimes and their temperature-driven crossover. The work positions nanomechanics as a simpler platform for electron hydrodynamics in which viscosity becomes a dominant factor in the mechanical response.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the approach offers a conceptually simpler and more accessible alternative to scanning magnetometry for direct vortex detection, while highlighting how hydrodynamic effects can dominate nanoelectromechanical behavior. This could broaden experimental access to electron hydrodynamics in 2D systems and provide new falsifiable signatures of viscosity that are difficult to isolate in transport measurements alone.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and experimental results] The interpretation that observed vibrations arise specifically from the vortex magnetic moment torque (m × B) is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides no order-of-magnitude estimates, force-balance equations, or control measurements demonstrating that competing contributions (Lorentz forces on leads, electrostatic cavity gradients, viscous shear transmitted to the membrane, or thermal expansion) remain negligible across the reported temperature range. This quantitative isolation is required to rule out alternative drivers of the resonator response.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from explicit mention of the host material system, cavity radius, and resonator dimensions to allow readers to assess the scale at which the torque mechanism is claimed to dominate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. The concern regarding quantitative isolation of the vortex torque mechanism is well-taken and directly relevant to the central claim. We address it point-by-point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and experimental results] The interpretation that observed vibrations arise specifically from the vortex magnetic moment torque (m × B) is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides no order-of-magnitude estimates, force-balance equations, or control measurements demonstrating that competing contributions (Lorentz forces on leads, electrostatic cavity gradients, viscous shear transmitted to the membrane, or thermal expansion) remain negligible across the reported temperature range. This quantitative isolation is required to rule out alternative drivers of the resonator response.

    Authors: We agree that order-of-magnitude estimates and force-balance analysis are necessary to substantiate the interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (likely in the theory or supplementary material) containing explicit calculations that compare the magnitude of the magnetic torque m × B against the listed competing contributions. These estimates will use the reported device parameters, measured currents, and temperature-dependent viscosity to show that the vortex torque remains the dominant driver over the experimental range. We will also incorporate a brief discussion of how the observed temperature crossover itself provides a distinguishing signature inconsistent with purely electrostatic or thermal-expansion mechanisms, and we will outline feasible control measurements (e.g., field-orientation dependence and cavity-size variation) that can be performed in follow-up work. These additions will be presented without altering the existing data or claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental detection relies on standard physics

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental nanomechanical method: a circular cavity in a suspended resonator hosts a vortex whose current produces a magnetic moment, which experiences torque from an in-plane field to drive observable vibrations. This chain uses standard electromagnetic torque (m × B) and resonator mechanics without any self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs. No uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are invoked in a circular manner. The detection is falsifiable via direct observation and temperature crossover, remaining self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from electromagnetism and mesoscopic electron transport; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Circulating current in the vortex generates a magnetic moment that experiences torque in an in-plane field
    Core physical link between vortex and mechanical response.
  • domain assumption Vibrations of the resonator directly and selectively reveal the vortex presence and nature
    Assumes dominance of torque-driven signal over other mechanical effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5436 in / 1238 out tokens · 47317 ms · 2026-05-13T18:22:43.342819+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    based on resonant frequency shifts may offer higher precision than the amplitude detection used here. At gigahertz-range or higher frequencies, where the mechanical period approaches the characteristic timescales of vortex rotation and decay, strong coupling between mechanical motion and electron vortices is expected, enabling direct access to vortex kine...

    work page

  2. [2]

    R. N. Gurzhi, HYDRODYNAMIC EFFECTS IN SOLIDS AT LOW TEMPERATURE.Soviet Physics Uspekhi11(2), 255–270 (1968), doi:10.1070/pu1968v011n02abeh003815,http: //dx.doi.org/10.1070/PU1968v011n02ABEH003815

    work page doi:10.1070/pu1968v011n02abeh003815 1968

  3. [3]

    Varnavides, A

    G. Varnavides, A. Yacoby, C. Felser, P. Narang, Charge transport and hydrodynamics in ma- terials.Nature Reviews Materials8(11), 726–741 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00597-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00597-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00597-3 2023

  4. [4]

    Fritz, T

    L. Fritz, T. Scaffidi, Hydrodynamic Electronic Transport.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics15(1), 17–44 (2024), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040521-042014,http:// dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040521-042014

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040521-042014 2024

  5. [5]

    B. N. Narozhny, Hydrodynamic approach to two-dimensional electron systems.La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento45(10), 661–736 (2022), doi:10.1007/s40766-022-00036-z,http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s40766-022-00036-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s40766-022-00036-z 2022

  6. [6]

    Polini, A

    M. Polini, A. K. Geim, Viscous electron fluids.Physics Today73(6), 28–34 (2020), doi: 10.1063/pt.3.4497,http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4497

    work page doi:10.1063/pt.3.4497 2020

  7. [7]

    J. A. Sulpizio,et al., Visualizing Poiseuille flow of hydrodynamic electrons.Nature576(7785), 75–79 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    M. J. H. Ku,et al., Imaging viscous flow of the Dirac fluid in graphene.Nature 583(7817), 537–541 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2507-2,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-020-2507-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2507-2 2020

  9. [9]

    Vool,et al., Imaging phonon-mediated hydrodynamic flow in WTe2.Nat

    U. Vool,et al., Imaging phonon-mediated hydrodynamic flow in WTe2.Nat. Phys.(2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    G. M. Gusev, A. S. Jaroshevich, A. D. Levin, Z. D. Kvon, A. K. Bakarov, Stokes flow around an obstacle in viscous two-dimensional electron liquid.Scientific Reports10(1) (2020), doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64807-6,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64807-6. 13

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64807-6 2020

  11. [11]

    R. Krishna Kumar,et al., Superballistic flow of viscous electron fluid through graphene constrictions.Nature Physics13(12), 1182–1185 (2017), doi:10.1038/nphys4240,http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys4240

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4240 2017

  12. [12]

    D. A. Bandurin,et al., Negative local resistance caused by viscous electron backflow in graphene.Science351(6277), 1055–1058 (2016), doi:10.1126/science.aad0201,http://dx. doi.org/10.1126/science.aad0201

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aad0201 2016

  13. [13]

    A. Gupta,et al., Hydrodynamic and Ballistic Transport over Large Length Scales in GaAs/AlGaAs.Physical Review Letters126(7) (2021), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.076803, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.076803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.076803 2021

  14. [14]

    A. Gupta,et al., Precision measurement of electron-electron scattering in GaAs/AlGaAs using transverse magnetic focusing.Nature Communications12(1) (2021), doi:10.1038/ s41467-021-25327-7,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25327-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25327-7 2021

  15. [15]

    F. M. D. Pellegrino, I. Torre, A. K. Geim, M. Polini, Electron hydrodynamics dilemma: Whirlpools or no whirlpools.Physical Review B94(15) (2016), doi:10.1103/physrevb.94. 155414,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155414

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94 2016

  16. [16]

    Levitov, G

    L. Levitov, G. Falkovich, Electron viscosity, current vortices and negative nonlocal resistance in graphene.Nature Physics12(7), 672–676 (2016), doi:10.1038/nphys3667,http://dx. doi.org/10.1038/nphys3667

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3667 2016

  17. [17]

    Shytov, J

    A. Shytov, J. F. Kong, G. Falkovich, L. Levitov, Particle collisions and negative nonlocal response of ballistic electrons.Phys. Rev. Lett.121(17) (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    K. G. Nazaryan, L. Levitov, Nonlocal conductivity, continued fractions, and current vortices in electron fluids.Physical Review B110(4) (2024), doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.045147,http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.045147

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.045147 2024

  19. [19]

    Falkovich, L

    G. Falkovich, L. Levitov, Linking Spatial Distributions of Potential and Current in Vis- cous Electronics.Physical Review Letters119(6) (2017), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.066601, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.066601. 14

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.066601 2017

  20. [20]

    M. L. Palm,et al., Observation of current whirlpools in graphene at room temperature.Science 384(6694), 465–469 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adj2167,http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.adj2167

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj2167 2024

  21. [21]

    Aharon-Steinberg,et al., Direct observation of vortices in an electron fluid.Nature 607(7917), 74–80 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04794-y,http://dx.doi.org/10

    A. Aharon-Steinberg,et al., Direct observation of vortices in an electron fluid.Nature 607(7917), 74–80 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04794-y,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-022-04794-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04794-y 2022

  22. [22]

    M. J. M. de Jong, L. W. Molenkamp, Hydrodynamic electron flow in high-mobility wires. Physical Review B51(19), 13389–13402 (1995), doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.13389,http:// dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.13389

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.13389 1995

  23. [23]

    R. N. Gurzhi, A. N. Kalinenko, A. I. Kopeliovich, Electron-Electron Collisions and a New Hydrodynamic Effect in Two-Dimensional Electron Gas.Physical Review Letters 74(19), 3872–3875 (1995), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.3872,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.74.3872

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.3872 1995

  24. [24]

    Estrada- ´Alvarez, E

    J. Estrada- ´Alvarez, E. D´ıaz, F. Dom´ınguez-Adame, Superballistic Paradox in Electron Fluids: Relevance of Tomographic Transport.Physical Review Letters135(20) (2025), doi:10.1103/ xsjh-lq5h,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/xsjh-lq5h

    work page doi:10.1103/xsjh-lq5h 2025

  25. [25]

    Berggren, C

    K.-F. Berggren, C. Besev, Z.-L. Ji, Transition from laminar to vortex flow in a model semi- conductor nanostructure.Physica ScriptaT42, 141–148 (1992), doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1992/ t42/025,http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/1992/T42/025

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1992/ 1992

  26. [26]

    Exner, P

    P. Exner, P. ˇSeba, A. F. Sadreev, P. Stˇreda, P. Feher, Strength of Topologically Induced Magnetic Moments in a Quantum Device.Physical Review Letters80(8), 1710–1713 (1998), doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.80.1710,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1710

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1710 1998

  27. [27]

    Ensslin, Semiconductor quantum devices: from GaAs to graphene.Europhysics News56(2), 32–34 (2025), doi:10.1051/epn/2025213,http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epn/2025213

    K. Ensslin, Semiconductor quantum devices: from GaAs to graphene.Europhysics News56(2), 32–34 (2025), doi:10.1051/epn/2025213,http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epn/2025213

    work page doi:10.1051/epn/2025213 2025

  28. [28]

    A. C. Keser,et al., Geometric Control of Universal Hydrodynamic Flow in a Two-Dimensional Electron Fluid.Physical Review X11(3) (2021), doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031030,http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031030. 15

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031030 2021

  29. [29]

    D. I. Sarypov,et al., Slip Electron Flow in GaAs Microscale Constrictions.Physical Review Let- ters135(23) (2025), doi:10.1103/r8hl-91rv,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/r8hl-91rv

    work page doi:10.1103/r8hl-91rv 2025

  30. [30]

    P. S. Alekseev, Negative Magnetoresistance in Viscous Flow of Two-Dimensional Electrons. Physical Review Letters117(16) (2016), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.166601,http://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.166601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.166601 2016

  31. [31]

    H. Yamaguchi, GaAs-based micro/nanomechanical resonators.Semiconductor Science and Technology32(10), 103003 (2017), doi:10.1088/1361-6641/aa857a,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-6641/aa857a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6641/aa857a 2017

  32. [32]

    A. G. Pogosov, A. A. Shevyrin, D. A. Pokhabov, E. Y. Zhdanov, S. Kumar, Suspended semi- conductor nanostructures: physics and technology.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34(26), 263001 (2022), doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac6308,http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-648X/ac6308

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac6308 2022

  33. [33]

    Okazaki, I

    Y. Okazaki, I. Mahboob, K. Onomitsu, S. Sasaki, H. Yamaguchi, Gate-controlled electrome- chanical backaction induced by a quantum dot.Nature Communications7(1) (2016), doi: 10.1038/ncomms11132,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11132

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms11132 2016

  34. [34]

    J. G. E. Harris, D. D. Awschalom, K. D. Maranowski, A. C. Gossard, Magnetization and dissipation measurements in the quantum Hall regime using an integrated micromechanical magnetometer.Journal of Applied Physics87(9), 5102–5104 (2000), doi:10.1063/1.373262, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.373262

    work page doi:10.1063/1.373262 2000

  35. [35]

    Khivrich, A

    I. Khivrich, A. A. Clerk, S. Ilani, Nanomechanical pump–probe measurements of insulating electronic states in a carbon nanotube.Nature Nanotechnology14(2), 161–167 (2019), doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0341-6,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0341-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0341-6 2019

  36. [36]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary material

    work page

  37. [37]

    Schmid, L

    S. Schmid, L. G. Villanueva, M. L. Roukes,Fundamentals of Nanomechanical Resonators (Springer International Publishing) (2023), doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29628-4,http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29628-4. 16

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29628-4 2023

  38. [38]

    Bachtold, J

    A. Bachtold, J. Moser, M. Dykman, Mesoscopic physics of nanomechanical systems.Reviews of Modern Physics94(4) (2022), doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045005,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045005

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.045005 2022

  39. [39]

    A. N. Cleland, M. L. Roukes, A nanometre-scale mechanical electrometer.Nature392(6672), 160–162 (1998), doi:10.1038/32373,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/32373

    work page doi:10.1038/32373 1998

  40. [40]

    A. A. Shevyrin,et al., Disentanglement of physical mechanisms for driving and detection in piezoelectric nanoelectromechanical systems.Applied Physics Letters127(14) (2025), doi: 10.1063/5.0289781,http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0289781

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0289781 2025

  41. [41]

    Imboden, P

    M. Imboden, P. Mohanty, Dissipation in nanoelectromechanical systems.Physics Re- ports534(3), 89–146 (2014), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.003,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.physrep.2013.09.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.09.003 2014

  42. [42]

    Sazonova,et al., A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator.Nature431(7006), 284–287 (2004), doi:10.1038/nature02905,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02905

    V. Sazonova,et al., A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator.Nature431(7006), 284–287 (2004), doi:10.1038/nature02905,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02905

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02905 2004

  43. [43]

    A. A. Shevyrin, A. G. Pogosov, A. K. Bakarov, A. A. Shklyaev, Electrostatic actuation and charge sensing in piezoelectric nanomechanical resonators with a two-dimensional electron gas.Applied Physics Letters118(18) (2021), doi:10.1063/5.0047592,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0047592

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0047592 2021

  44. [44]

    G. F. Giuliani, J. Quinn, Coulomb inelastic lifetime of a quasi-particle in a two-dimensional electron gas.Surface Science142(1–3), 48–51 (1984), doi:10.1016/0039-6028(84)90282-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(84)90282-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0039-6028(84)90282-6 1984

  45. [45]

    D. A. Egorov,et al., The role of small-angle electron–electron scattering in transverse magnetic focusing experiment.Journal of Applied Physics138(11) (2025), doi:10.1063/5.0289677, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0289677

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0289677 2025

  46. [46]

    M. D. LaHaye, J. Suh, P. M. Echternach, K. C. Schwab, M. L. Roukes, Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit.Nature459(7249), 960–964 (2009), doi:10.1038/ nature08093,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08093. 17

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08093 2009

  47. [47]

    Mendoza, H

    M. Mendoza, H. J. Herrmann, S. Succi, Preturbulent Regimes in Graphene Flow.Physical Review Letters106(15) (2011), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.156601,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.156601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.156601 2011

  48. [48]

    M¨ uller, J

    M. M¨ uller, J. Schmalian, L. Fritz, Graphene: A Nearly Perfect Fluid.Physical Review Let- ters103(2) (2009), doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.025301,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.025301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.025301 2009

  49. [49]

    E. Y. Zhdanov,et al., Giant Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations with V-shaped minima in a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas: Experiment and phenomenological model.Phys- ical Review B113(3) (2026), doi:10.1103/gmyb-hxpp,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ gmyb-hxpp. Acknowledgments The authors thank Maxim S. Aksenov, Natalya R. Vicina, Sergey V. Ishutkin and Ek...

    work page doi:10.1103/gmyb-hxpp 2026