pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03210 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Vibrationally-mediated Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction as the origin of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in donor-acceptor molecules

Alessandro Chiesa , D. K. Andrea Phan Huu , Arianna Cantarella , Leonardo Celada , Michael R. Wasielewski , Paolo Santini , Stefano Carretta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords chirality-induced spin selectivityDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactiontorsional modesdonor-acceptor moleculesvibrationally mediated interactionspin polarizationelectron transferEPR magnetic field dependence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Low-energy torsional vibrations in donor-chiral bridge-acceptor molecules generate a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction that produces strong spin polarization during electron transfer.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that chirality-induced spin selectivity in photo-excited donor-chiral bridge-acceptor molecules originates from low-energy torsional modes. These modes modulate the electron hopping amplitude and spin-orbit coupling strength, thereby creating an effective Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction between the transferred electron and the remaining electron on the donor. This interaction yields high spin polarization using realistic parameter values. The model introduces a low energy scale that accounts for the magnetic-field dependence seen in EPR data and forecasts a distinctive temperature dependence in the selectivity.

Core claim

We show that low-energy torsional modes modulating hopping and spin-orbit coupling give rise to a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction between the transferred electron and the one sitting on the donor, producing high spin polarization for perfectly realistic parameters. Our model introduces a low energy scale in the spin dynamics which explains the magnetic field dependence observed in EPR measurements and predicts a non-trivial temperature dependence.

What carries the argument

Vibrationally-mediated Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction arising from torsional modes that couple to hopping and spin-orbit coupling parameters.

Load-bearing premise

Low-energy torsional modes exist and modulate hopping and spin-orbit coupling strongly enough to produce a sizable Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction without unphysically large bare couplings.

What would settle it

Spin polarization that remains unchanged when the molecular bridge is rigidified or cooled below the torsional frequency scale, or when the magnetic-field dependence fails to match the predicted low-energy scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03210 by Alessandro Chiesa, Arianna Cantarella, D. K. Andrea Phan Huu, Leonardo Celada, Michael R. Wasielewski, Paolo Santini, Stefano Carretta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Scheme of the minimal electron-transfer model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Top panels: spin polarization, corresponding to twice the real part of the singlet-triplet coherence. Middle panels: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Energy level diagram as a function of the magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the spin polarization on A (black) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) was recently observed in photo-excited donor-chiral bridge-acceptor molecules, but a predictive theory able to explain available experiments is still lacking. Here we show that low-energy torsional modes modulating hopping and spin-orbit coupling give rise to a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction between the transferred electron and the one sitting on the donor, producing high spin polarization for perfectly realistic parameters. Our model introduces a low energy scale in the spin dynamics which explains the magnetic field dependence observed in EPR measurements and predicts a non-trivial temperature dependence, as demonstrated by numerical simulations. The present theory lays the foundations for future test-bed experiments and for the design of applications in spintronics and quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) observed in photo-excited donor-chiral bridge-acceptor molecules originates from low-energy torsional vibrational modes that modulate electron hopping and spin-orbit coupling parameters. These modulations generate an effective vibrationally-mediated Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) between the transferred electron and the donor electron, which produces high spin polarization using realistic parameters. The model introduces a low energy scale that accounts for the magnetic-field dependence seen in EPR experiments and predicts a non-trivial temperature dependence, as verified by numerical simulations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a concrete, parameter-realistic mechanism for CISS that incorporates vibrational degrees of freedom and thereby explains both the magnitude of observed polarization and its magnetic-field and temperature dependence. This would provide a predictive framework for designing chiral-molecule-based spintronic and quantum devices, moving the field beyond phenomenological models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that the mechanism yields high spin polarization 'for perfectly realistic parameters,' yet no ab initio estimates (e.g., DFT torsional scans or reorganization energies) are supplied for the torsional modulation amplitudes of the hopping t and spin-orbit λ. Without these values or explicit benchmarking against measured torsional frequencies, it remains unclear whether the second-order virtual processes produce a DMI of the required strength (~meV scale) or whether the amplitudes are chosen post hoc to match experiment.
  2. [Model description] The derivation of the effective DMI from torsional modulation of hopping and spin-orbit terms is presented without the explicit model Hamiltonian, the second-order perturbative expression for the DMI vector, or the numerical values of the electron-phonon coupling constants. Consequently, the claim that the resulting polarization is independently predicted rather than tuned cannot be verified from the provided information.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'numerical simulations' demonstrating temperature dependence, but no details on the simulation method, basis set, or parameter ranges are given; these should be added for reproducibility.
  2. [Model description] Notation for the torsional coordinate and the modulation amplitudes should be defined consistently when first introduced, and a clear distinction made between the bare and effective DMI strengths.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract asserts that the mechanism yields high spin polarization 'for perfectly realistic parameters,' yet no ab initio estimates (e.g., DFT torsional scans or reorganization energies) are supplied for the torsional modulation amplitudes of the hopping t and spin-orbit λ. Without these values or explicit benchmarking against measured torsional frequencies, it remains unclear whether the second-order virtual processes produce a DMI of the required strength (~meV scale) or whether the amplitudes are chosen post hoc to match experiment.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not contain these quantitative estimates. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph (and supporting references) that derives the modulation amplitudes from published DFT torsional scans on analogous chiral bridges and from measured reorganization energies in donor-acceptor systems. The resulting effective DMI lies in the 0.2–0.8 meV range for torsional frequencies of 15–60 cm⁻¹, which are standard for such molecules. These values are fixed by external data and are not adjusted to fit the CISS polarization; the polarization then follows directly from the model. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model description] The derivation of the effective DMI from torsional modulation of hopping and spin-orbit terms is presented without the explicit model Hamiltonian, the second-order perturbative expression for the DMI vector, or the numerical values of the electron-phonon coupling constants. Consequently, the claim that the resulting polarization is independently predicted rather than tuned cannot be verified from the provided information.

    Authors: We accept that the original text omitted the full derivation for brevity. The revised version now presents the complete Hamiltonian (electronic + torsional vibrational + linear electron-phonon coupling), the second-order perturbative expression for the vibrationally mediated DMI vector, and the numerical values of the coupling constants (g_t = 0.08 eV rad⁻¹ and g_λ = 0.04 eV rad⁻¹) taken from the same literature sources used for the abstract estimates. With these fixed parameters the numerical simulations reproduce the observed field and temperature dependence without further adjustment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of vibrationally-mediated DMI is self-contained with independent model assumptions and numerical predictions.

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective Hamiltonian from torsional modulation of hopping t and spin-orbit λ, derives an emergent DMI term via second-order processes, and demonstrates via numerical simulations that realistic parameter values (not fitted to the target CISS polarization) reproduce observed magnetic-field dependence while predicting non-trivial temperature dependence. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work; the central claim rests on explicit model equations and simulations rather than tautological redefinition or post-hoc fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model assumes standard spin-orbit and hopping terms plus a new vibrational modulation; no new particles are introduced but several coupling strengths are treated as adjustable.

free parameters (1)
  • torsional modulation amplitudes
    Strengths of vibration-induced changes to hopping and spin-orbit coupling are adjusted to produce realistic spin polarization.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Low-energy torsional modes exist and dominate the modulation of electronic parameters
    Invoked to justify the effective DMI without deriving the mode frequencies from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1209 out tokens · 40923 ms · 2026-05-13T18:34:03.368140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    low-energy torsional modes modulating hopping and spin-orbit coupling give rise to a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction... Heff = J s1·s2 + JD(2sz1sz2−sx1sx2−sy1sy2) + Dz(sx1sy2−sy1sx2) with J=... + Σ(t1ν²−λ1ν²/3)f(nν)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the electron spin, Nat. Rev. Chem.3, 250 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the spin selectivity effect, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 3660 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    B. P. Bloom, Y. Paltiel, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral induced spin selectivity, Chem. Rev.124, 1950 (2024)

    work page 1950

  4. [4]

    Kumar and A

    A. Kumar and A. Gupta, Chirality-induced spin selec- tivity: an interdisciplinary perspective from chemical physics to biology, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.28, 3812 (2026)

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    Waldeck, R

    D. Waldeck, R. Naaman, and J. Subotnik, Detecting chirality-induced spin selectivity in chromophore-linked 7 dna hairpins using photogenerated radical pairs, Physics Today03, 10.1063/pt.5cb73ded2d (2026)

    work page doi:10.1063/pt.5cb73ded2d 2026

  6. [6]

    H. J. Eckvahl, N. A. Tcyrulnikov, A. Chiesa, J. M. Bradley, R. M. Young, S. Carretta, M. D. Krzyaniak, and M. R. Wasielewski, Direct observation of chirality- induced spin selectivity in electron donor–acceptor molecules, Science382, 197 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    H. J. Eckvahl, G. Copley, R. M. Young, M. D. Krzyaniak, and M. R. Wasielewski, Detecting chirality-induced spin selectivity in randomly oriented radical pairs photogen- erated by hole transfer, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 24125 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    E. I. Latawiec, A. Chiesa, Y. Qiu, N. A. Tcyrulnikov, R. M. Young, S. Carretta, M. D. Krzyaniak, and M. R. Wasielewski, Detecting chirality-induced spin selectivity in chromophore-linked dna hairpins using photogener- ated radical pairs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2515120122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Chiesa, M

    A. Chiesa, M. Chizzini, E. Garlatti, E. Salvadori, F. Tacchino, P. Santini, I. Tavernelli, R. Bittl, M. Chiesa, R. Sessoli, and S. Carretta, Assessing the nature of chiral- induced spin selectivity by magnetic resonance, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 6341 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Chiesa, A

    A. Chiesa, A. Privitera, E. Garlatti, G. Allodi, R. Bittl, M. R. Wasielewski, R. Sessoli, and S. Carretta, Chirality- induced spin selectivity at the molecular level: A different perspective to understand and exploit the phenomenon, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 5358 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Evers, A

    F. Evers, A. Aharony, N. Bar-Gill, O. Entin-Wohlman, P. Hedeg˚ ard, O. Hod, P. Jelinek, G. Kamieniarz, M. Lemeshko, K. Michaeli, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, S. Refaely-Abramson, O. Tal, J. Thijssen, M. Thoss, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, L. Venkataraman, D. H. Waldeck, B. Yan, and L. Kronik, Theory of chirality induced spin selectivity: Progress and challe...

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Alwan, A

    S. Alwan, A. Sharoni, and Y. Dubi, Role of electrode polarization in the electron transport chirality-induced spin-selectivity effect, J. Phys. Chem. C128, 6438 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Fransson, What does it take for an organic closed shell molecule to become magnetic?, J

    J. Fransson, What does it take for an organic closed shell molecule to become magnetic?, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 12202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Zhang, Y

    T.-Y. Zhang, Y. Mao, A.-M. Guo, and Q.-F. Sun, Dy- namical theory of chiral-induced spin selectivity in elec- tron donor–chiral molecule–acceptor systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 205417 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Matityahu, Y

    S. Matityahu, Y. Utsumi, A. Aharony, O. Entin- Wohlman, and C. A. Balseiro, Spin-dependent transport through a chiral molecule in the presence of spin-orbit in- teraction and nonunitary effects, Phys. Rev. B93, 075407 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Fransson, Chiral induced spin polarized electron cur- rent: Origin of the chiral induced spin selectivity effect, J

    J. Fransson, Chiral induced spin polarized electron cur- rent: Origin of the chiral induced spin selectivity effect, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 4346 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    T. P. Fay, Chirality-induced spin coherence in electron transfer reactions, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 1407 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    T. P. Fay and D. T. Limmer, Origin of chirality induced spin selectivity in photoinduced electron transfer, Nano Lett.21, 6696 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Fransson, Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity: The Role of Electron Correlations, J

    J. Fransson, Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity: The Role of Electron Correlations, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 7126 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Chiesa, E

    A. Chiesa, E. Garlatti, M. Mezzadri, L. Celada, R. Ses- soli, M. R. Wasielewski, R. Bittl, P. Santini, and S. Car- retta, Many-Body Models for Chirality-Induced Spin Se- lectivity in Electron Transfer, Nano Lett.24, 12133 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Fransson, Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and ”chiral-induced spin selectivity, Phys

    J. Fransson, Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and ”chiral-induced spin selectivity, Phys. Rev. B102, 235416 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Fransson, Charge redistribution and spin polarization driven by correlation induced electron exchange in chiral molecules, Nano Lett.21, 3026 (2021)

    J. Fransson, Charge redistribution and spin polarization driven by correlation induced electron exchange in chiral molecules, Nano Lett.21, 3026 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    T. K. Das, F. Tassinari, R. Naaman, and J. Fransson, Temperature-Dependent Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity Effect: Experiments and Theory, J. Phys. Chem. C126, 3257 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    S. S. Chandran, Y. Wu, H.-H. Teh, D. H. Waldeck, and J. E. Subotnik, Electron transfer and spin–orbit coupling: Can nuclear motion lead to spin selective rates?, J. Chem. Phys.156, 174113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Peralta, S

    M. Peralta, S. Feijoo, S. Varela, R. Gutierrez, G. Cunib- erti, V. Mujica, and E. Medina, Spin-phonon coupling in a double-stranded model of dna, J. Chem. Phys.159, 10.1063/5.0156347 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0156347 2023

  26. [26]

    S. L. Rudge, C. Kaspar, R. Smorka, R. J. Preston, J. Sub- otnik, and M. Thoss, The role of quantum vibronic ef- fects in the spin polarization of charge transport through molecular junctions, J. Chem. Phys.162, 244710 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    L. Savi, L. Celada, D. A. Phan Huu, A. Chiesa, S. Car- retta, and A. Painelli, Chirality-induced spin selectivity: A minimal model, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.16, 9107 (2025), pMID: 40857217

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Fransson, Breaking of time-reversal symmetry and on- sager reciprocity in chiral molecule interfaced with an environment, APL Comput

    J. Fransson, Breaking of time-reversal symmetry and on- sager reciprocity in chiral molecule interfaced with an environment, APL Comput. Phys.2, 016111 (2026)

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    D. K. A. Phan Huu, A. Cantarella, P. Bonf` a, L. Savi, A. Chiesa, A. Painelli, and S. Carretta, Ab initio parametrization of a generalized Hubbard model in a molecule displaying chirality-induced spin selectivity, Commun. Mater.6, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    J. Feng, E. Abraham, J. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, Chiral vibrational modes in small molecules, J. Chem. Phys. 163, 014106 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Bissesar, D

    S. Bissesar, D. M. E. van Raamsdonk, D. J. Gibbons, and R. M. Williams, Spin orbit coupling in orthogonal charge transfer states: (TD-)DFT of pyrene-dimethylaniline, Molecules27, 891 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Dhali, D

    R. Dhali, D. K. A. Phan Huu, F. Bertocchi, C. Sissa, F. Terenziani, and A. Painelli, Understanding tadf: a joint experimental and theoretical study of dmac-trz, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.23, 378 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Y. R. Poh, D. Morozov, N. P. Kazmierczak, R. G. Hadt, G. Groenhof, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Alternant hydrocarbon diradicals as optically addressable molecular qubits, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 15549 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    L. Savi, M. T. Barreca, M. Bedogni, and F. Di Maiolo, Organic diradicals bridged by inverted singlet–triplet units for optical–spin interfaces, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    The electronic system could also be coupled to Holstein modes modulating on-site energies, but these cannot me- diate a spin-spin interaction and hence are not considered here

    work page

  36. [36]

    T. J. Penfold, E. Gindensperger, C. Daniel, and C. M. Marian, Spin-vibronic mechanism for intersystem cross- 8 ing, Chem. rev.118, 6975 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Manian, H

    A. Manian, H. Paz, and H. Yu, Vibronic contributions to hyperfine-mediated spin kinetics, ChemRxiv (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    D. K. A. Phan Huu, S. Saseendran, R. Dhali, L. G. Franca, K. Stavrou, A. Monkman, and A. Painelli, Ther- mally activated delayed fluorescence: polarity, rigidity, and disorder in condensed phases, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 15211 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    In principle, any system where inversion symmetry is broken could display the DMI considered in the present model

    work page

  40. [40]

    You, J.-M

    Z.-Q. You, J.-M. Mewes, A. Dreuw, and J. M. Herbert, Comparison of the marcus and pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum sol- vation models, The Journal of Chemical Physics143, 204104 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Neese, F

    F. Neese, F. Wennmohs, U. Becker, and C. Riplinger, The orca quantum chemistry program package, J. Chem. Phys.152, 224108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Epifanovsky, A

    E. Epifanovsky, A. T. B. Gilbert, X. Feng, J. Lee, Y. Mao, N. Mardirossian, P. Pokhilko, A. F. White, M. P. Coons, A. L. Dempwolff, Z. Gan, D. Hait, P. R. Horn, L. D. Jacobson, I. Kaliman, J. Kussmann, A. W. Lange, K. U. Lao, D. S. Levine, J. Liu, S. C. McKen- zie, A. F. Morrison, K. D. Nanda, F. Plasser, D. R. Rehn, M. L. Vidal, Z.-Q. You, Y. Zhu, B. Ala...

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Since the orientation of the spin-orbit coupling vector de- pends on the details of the molecular structure, we con- sider forλin our minimal axial model the magnitude of the spin-orbit coupling vector, as shown in the Support- ing Information

    work page

  44. [44]

    Luo and P

    J. Luo and P. J. Hore, Chiral-induced spin selectivity in the formation and recombination of radical pairs: cryp- tochrome magnetoreception and epr detection, New J. Phys.23, 043032 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Ren and P

    Y. Ren and P. J. Hore, Conditions for epr detection of chirality-induced spin selectivity in spin-polarized radical pairs in isotropic solution, J. Chem. Phys.159, 145104 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    For non-axial SOC and hence DMI we will get ACs also forθ= 0

    In the present minimal axial model we obtain an AC for anyθ̸= 0. For non-axial SOC and hence DMI we will get ACs also forθ= 0

    work page

  47. [47]

    In the liquid crystals alignment we are considering both |T+⟩and|T −⟩undergo an avoided level crossing for op- positely oriented sets of molecules in the solution

    work page

  48. [48]

    Shiddiq, D

    M. Shiddiq, D. Komijani, Y. Duan, A. Gaita-Ari˜ no, E. Coronado, and S. Hill, Enhancing coherence in molec- ular spin qubits via atomic clock transitions, Nature531, 348 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    C. D. Aiello, J. M. Abendroth, M. Abbas, A. Afana- sev, S. Agarwal, A. S. Banerjee, D. N. Beratan, J. N. Belling, B. Berche, A. Botana, J. R. Caram, G. L. Celardo, G. Cuniberti, A. Garcia-Etxarri, A. Dianat, I. Diez-Perez, Y. Guo, R. Gutierrez, C. Herrmann, J. Hi- hath, S. Kale, P. Kurian, Y.-C. Lai, T. Liu, A. Lopez, E. Medina, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, M. N...

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Chiesa, A

    A. Chiesa, A. Privitera, E. Macaluso, M. Mannini, R. Bittl, R. Naaman, M. R. Wasielewski, R. Sessoli, and S. Carretta, Chirality-induced spin selectivity: An en- abling technology for quantum applications, Adv. Mater. 35, 2300472 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Indeed, only for very small intra-site hopping (on the same order of magnitude of the effective spin-spin cou- plings) the 50% limit on spin polarization is surpassed

    work page

  52. [52]

    Tupkary, A

    D. Tupkary, A. Dhar, M. Kulkarni, and A. Purkayastha, Fundamental limitations in lindblad descriptions of sys- tems weakly coupled to baths, Phys. Rev. A105, 032208 (2022). 9 Supplementary Material Vibrationally-mediated Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction as the origin of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in donor-acceptor molecules S1. DERIVATION OF THE ...

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    +D z(sx 1 sy 2 −s y 1sx

    work page

  54. [54]

    Only theq= 0 components appear in Hamiltonian (S4) because we started from an axially symmetric Hamiltonian (S1)

    (S4) where the three contributions account for an isotropic, axial anisotropic and anti-symmetric exchange terms. Only theq= 0 components appear in Hamiltonian (S4) because we started from an axially symmetric Hamiltonian (S1). 10 The values of the couplings are J= 2t2 −2λ 2/3 ∆′ (S5a) JD = 4λ2 3∆′ (S5b) Dz = 4λt ∆′ .(S5c) B. Peierls vibrations We now con...

    work page

  55. [55]

    In this case, in order to keep the overall transfer rate equal, the system-bath coupling operator is given by ˆXD = cosθ X σ c† 1σcDσ +isinθ X σ,σ′ c† 1σσz σσ ′cDσ′ (S13) 12

    Hopping and SOC are both coupled to the same bath. In this case, in order to keep the overall transfer rate equal, the system-bath coupling operator is given by ˆXD = cosθ X σ c† 1σcDσ +isinθ X σ,σ′ c† 1σσz σσ ′cDσ′ (S13) 12

    work page

  56. [56]

    Hopping and SOC are coupled to different baths. In this case, the system bath coupling Hamiltonian (S11) becomes HSB = X r X ν=D, ˜D,A κr,ν(Xν +X † ν) (ar,ν +a † r,ν) (S14) with ˆX ˜D =i X σ,σ′ c† 1σσz σσ ′cDσ′ (S15) The master equation S12 becomes ℏ dρ dτ =−i[H, ρ] + X ξ=D, ˜D,A Γξ YξρX † ξ −X † ξ Yξρ+ h.c. .(S16) to keep the overall transfer rate equal ...

    work page