pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03646 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Superradiant phase transition in cavity magnonics via Floquet engineering

Si-Yan Lin , Fei Gao , Ye-Jun Xu , Lijiong Shen , Yan Wang , Xiao-Qing Luo , Guo-Qiang Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords superradiant phase transitioncavity magnonicsFloquet engineeringparity symmetry breakingYIG spheremagnon-photon couplingphase transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Floquet frequency modulation of magnons induces superradiant phase transitions with abrupt and continuous changes in occupation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how periodically modulating the magnon frequency in a YIG sphere coupled to a microwave cavity can engineer the superradiant phase transition. By using Floquet engineering, the effective mode frequencies are tuned to create a phase diagram that includes a parity-symmetric phase, a parity-broken phase, and transitions between them. As the Floquet field strength increases, magnon occupation jumps discontinuously from zero to finite at a critical point, marking a first-order-like transition, then decreases continuously back to zero in a second-order transition. This provides a new method to achieve these transitions without relying on parametric driving of the microwave field.

Core claim

Under Floquet drive, the cavity magnonic system supports a rich steady-state phase diagram with parity-symmetric, parity-symmetry-broken, bistable, and unstable phases. Increasing the Floquet-field strength causes a discontinuous transition from the parity-symmetric phase to the broken phase, with magnon occupation jumping from zero to a finite value, followed by a continuous decline back to zero corresponding to a second-order restoration of parity symmetry.

What carries the argument

Floquet modulation of the magnon mode frequency, which controls the effective frequencies of both magnon and cavity modes to realize tunable phase transitions.

If this is right

  • The system can exhibit bistable and unstable phases alongside the symmetric and broken ones.
  • Magnon occupation jumps discontinuously from zero to finite at the first critical threshold.
  • Further drive increase causes continuous decline to zero in a second-order transition.
  • Fluctuations during the transitions can be analyzed in the steady state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This technique may allow for dynamic switching between quantum phases in magnonic hybrid systems.
  • Analogous Floquet methods could induce similar phase transitions in related cavity QED setups.
  • The rich phase diagram opens possibilities for studying nonequilibrium dynamics in driven magnon systems.

Load-bearing premise

The Floquet approximation remains valid and higher-order nonlinearities or damping terms do not destroy the predicted phase diagram when the modulation frequency and strength are chosen to reach the reported critical thresholds.

What would settle it

Measuring the magnon occupation as a function of increasing Floquet field strength to check for an abrupt jump followed by a continuous decrease to zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03646 by Fei Gao, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Lijiong Shen, Si-Yan Lin, Xiao-Qing Luo, Yan Wang, Ye-Jun Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the Floquet-driven cavity magnonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b). With this parameter set, the effective frequencies of the cavity and magnon modes, ωc/κ = ωm/κ = 8, remain independent of ξ, whereas the normalized coupling strengths λr/κ and λcr/κ vary with ξ. Near ξ = 2.2, the magnitudes of λr/κ and λcr/κ become comparable to those of ωc/κ and ωm/κ. This regime allows the system to exhibit SPT, as discussed in Sec. IV. III. STEADY-STATE SOLUTIONS OF THE CAVITY MAGN… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Steady-state phase diagram for the cavity magnonic system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)-(d) Temporal evolution of the scaled magnon number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The scaled magnon number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a scheme to engineer the superradiant phase transition (SPT) in cavity magnonics by periodically modulating the frequency of the magnon mode. The studied system is composed of a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) sphere positioned inside a microwave cavity, where magnons in the YIG sphere are strongly coupled to microwave photons. Under the Floquet drive, the effective frequencies of both the cavity and magnon modes can be readily controlled via the frequency and strength of Floquet field. This tunability allows the cavity magnonic system to support a rich steady-state phase diagram, featuring parity-symmetric, parity-symmetry-broken, bistable, and unstable phases. With the increase of Floquet-field strength, the system exhibit a discontinuous phase transition from the parity-symmetric phase to the parity-symmetry-broken phase at a critical threshold, accompanied by an abrupt jump of the magnon occupation from zero to a finite value. Upon further increase of Floquet-field strength, the magnon occupation declines continuously from a nonzero value back to zero, corresponding to a second-order phase transition that restores the parity-symmetric phase. Additionally, fluctuations in magnon number during the SPT process are examined. Our work establishes an alternative route to engineer the cavity-magnon SPT without relying on microwave parametric drive.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes periodically modulating the magnon frequency in a YIG sphere-cavity system to realize a superradiant phase transition via Floquet engineering. The resulting effective time-independent Hamiltonian yields a phase diagram containing parity-symmetric, parity-broken, bistable, and unstable regions, with a first-order transition (abrupt jump in magnon occupation) at a critical drive strength followed by a second-order restoration of symmetry at higher drive.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a tunable, parametric-drive-free route to SPT in cavity magnonics, with an experimentally accessible phase diagram that includes bistability and a re-entrant symmetric phase. The analysis of magnon-number fluctuations during the transitions provides additional dynamical insight relevant to hybrid quantum systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Eq. (7)] §III, Eq. (7) (Floquet-Magnus effective Hamiltonian): the leading-order truncation in 1/ω is used to obtain the effective magnon-photon detuning that crosses zero at the reported critical A. When A/ω reaches O(1) at this point (as implied by the GHz-scale frequencies and the plotted thresholds), the neglected O((A/ω)^2) counter-rotating and higher Magnus terms can renormalize the critical value or remove the bistable region; no explicit error bound or convergence test versus ω is supplied.
  2. [§IV] §IV, steady-state mean-field equations and fluctuation analysis: both the discontinuous jump and the subsequent continuous decline in magnon occupation are derived from the same approximated Hamiltonian. Because the first-order character is sensitive to the precise location of the detuning zero-crossing, any correction from higher-order Floquet terms directly undermines the claimed sequence of transitions.
  3. [§V] §V, numerical phase diagram: the boundaries separating symmetric, broken, and bistable phases are obtained under the same high-frequency approximation without a supplementary check (e.g., time-dependent integration at finite ω) that the neglected terms do not destroy the reported first-order jump.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, line 3: 'the system exhibit' should read 'the system exhibits'.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption: the color scale for magnon occupation is not labeled with units or the precise quantity plotted (e.g., steady-state <m†m>).
  3. [§II] Notation: the definition of the Floquet modulation amplitude A is introduced without an explicit relation to the physical drive voltage or magnetic-field amplitude used in experiment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the validity of the high-frequency Floquet-Magnus approximation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to include additional validation and discussion of the approximation's regime of applicability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§III, Eq. (7)] §III, Eq. (7) (Floquet-Magnus effective Hamiltonian): the leading-order truncation in 1/ω is used to obtain the effective magnon-photon detuning that crosses zero at the reported critical A. When A/ω reaches O(1) at this point (as implied by the GHz-scale frequencies and the plotted thresholds), the neglected O((A/ω)^2) counter-rotating and higher Magnus terms can renormalize the critical value or remove the bistable region; no explicit error bound or convergence test versus ω is supplied.

    Authors: We agree that the leading-order truncation requires A/ω to remain sufficiently small. In the parameter regimes presented, the drive frequency ω is chosen several times larger than both the magnon-photon coupling and the modulation amplitude A, keeping A/ω ≲ 0.25. To address the concern, we will add an explicit estimate of the leading correction to the effective detuning from the next Magnus term and include a short convergence test comparing the effective Hamiltonian predictions to direct numerical integration of the time-periodic equations for representative points near the critical drive strengths. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§IV] §IV, steady-state mean-field equations and fluctuation analysis: both the discontinuous jump and the subsequent continuous decline in magnon occupation are derived from the same approximated Hamiltonian. Because the first-order character is sensitive to the precise location of the detuning zero-crossing, any correction from higher-order Floquet terms directly undermines the claimed sequence of transitions.

    Authors: The first-order jump followed by continuous restoration is tied to the sign change of the effective detuning in the leading-order Hamiltonian. We will revise §IV to state that this qualitative sequence remains intact provided the approximation holds, and we will add a brief error analysis showing that O((A/ω)^2) shifts move the critical points quantitatively but do not eliminate the bistable region or invert the order of the transitions within the plotted parameter window. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§V] §V, numerical phase diagram: the boundaries separating symmetric, broken, and bistable phases are obtained under the same high-frequency approximation without a supplementary check (e.g., time-dependent integration at finite ω) that the neglected terms do not destroy the reported first-order jump.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the phase boundaries are obtained from the effective Hamiltonian without direct finite-ω verification. In the revision we will add a supplementary section with time-dependent numerical simulations of the full driven system at selected points across the phase diagram, confirming that the discontinuous jump and subsequent re-entrant behavior persist qualitatively when higher-order Floquet effects are retained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard Floquet-Magnus expansion on known Hamiltonian yields independent phase diagram

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard cavity-magnon Hamiltonian, applies the Floquet-Magnus expansion to obtain an effective time-independent Hamiltonian, and then extracts the steady-state phases and transitions from the mean-field equations of that effective model. No parameter is fitted to the reported critical thresholds or phase jumps, no equation reduces the target result to its own input by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The analysis is self-contained against the external benchmarks of Floquet theory and driven-dissipative mean-field theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard strong-coupling assumptions in cavity QED and the validity of the rotating-wave and Floquet approximations; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Floquet modulation amplitude and frequency
    Tuned parameters that set the location of the critical thresholds for the phase transitions.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Magnon-photon strong coupling regime holds under periodic driving
    Invoked to justify the effective Hamiltonian and steady-state analysis.
  • standard math Floquet theory applies to the time-periodic system
    Used to obtain time-independent effective frequencies and couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5548 in / 1284 out tokens · 24566 ms · 2026-05-13T17:00:21.606435+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Similarly, the input noise quadratures are defined by X(in) a =(a † in +a in)/ √ 2,Y (in) a =i(a † in −a in)/ √ 2,X (in) b =(b † in + bin)/ √ 2, andY (in) b =i(b † in−bin)/ √

    work page

  2. [2]

    Using these operators, the equations of motion for the quadrature fluctuations in Eq. (13) can be cast in the matrix form, ˙O=U O+O in,(14) whereO=(X a,Y a,X b,Y b)T is the vector of quadrature com- ponents,O in =( √ 2κX (in) a , √ 2κY (in) a , p 2γX (in) b , p 2γY (in) b )T is the vector of noise quadratures, and the drift matrixUis given by U= ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    B. Z. Rameshti, S. V . Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Nakamura, C. M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y . M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep. 979, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quan- tum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum in- formation science, Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Harder, Y

    M. Harder, Y . Yang, B. M. Yao, C. H. Yu, J. W. Rao, Y . S. Gui, R. L. Stamps, and C. M. Hu, Level attraction due to dissipative magnon-photon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 137203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    V . L. Grigoryan, K. Shen, and K. Xia, Synchronized spin- photon coupling in a microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. B98, 024406 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Y . Wang, W. Xiong, Z. Xu, G. Q. Zhang, and J. Q. You, Dissipation-induced nonreciprocal magnon blockade in a magnon-based hybrid system, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 260314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    W. Yu, J. Wang, H. Y . Yuan, and J. Xiao, Prediction of Attrac- tive Level Crossing via a Dissipative Mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 227201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. L. Zou, N. Zhu, F. Marquardt, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Magnon dark modes and gradient memory, Nat. Com- mun.6, 8914 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    G. Q. Zhang, W. Feng, W. Xiong, Q. P. Su, and C. P. Yang, Gen- eration of long-livedWstates via reservoir engineering in dis- sipatively coupled systems, Phys. Rev. A107, 012410 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Cao and P

    Y . Cao and P. Yan, Exceptional magnetic sensitivity ofPT- symmetric cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. B99, 214415 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    G. Q. Zhang and J. Q. You, Higher-order exceptional point in a cavity magnonics system, Phys. Rev. B99, 054404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Z. Rao, C. Meng, Y . Han, L. Zhu, K. Ding, and Z. An, Braiding reflectionless states in non-Hermitian magnonics, Nat. Phys. 20, 1904 (2024)

    work page 1904

  14. [14]

    N. J. Lambert, A. Schumer, J. J. Longdell, S. Rotter, and H. G. L. Schwefel, Coherent control of magnon-polaritons using an exceptional point, Nat. Phys.21, 1570 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y . Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Us- ami, and Y . Nakamura, Entanglement-based single-shot detec- tion of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit, Science 367, 425 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    F. X. Sun, S. S. Zheng, Y . Xiao, Q. Gong, Q. He, and K. Xia, Remote generation of magnon Schr ¨odinger cat state via magnon-photon entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 087203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    D. Xu, X. K. Gu, H. K. Li, Y . C. Weng, Y . P. Wang, J. Li, H. Wang, S. Y . Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum Control of a Single Magnon in a Macroscopic Spin System, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 193603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Y . P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y . Yang, P. C. Xu, Y . S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C. M. Hu, Nonreciprocity and Unidirectional Invisibility in Cavity Magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 127202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Zhang, A

    X. Zhang, A. Galda, X. Han, D. Jin, and V . M. Vinokur, Broad- band nonreciprocity enabled by strong coupling of magnons and microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 044039 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    J. Li, S. Y . Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Magnon-photon-phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 203601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Trickle, Z

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Detecting light dark matter with magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 201801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    S. P. Wolski, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, S. Kono, A. Noguchi, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Dissipation-based quan- tum sensing of magnons with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 117701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    G. Q. Zhang, Y . Wang, and W. Xiong, Detection sensitivity enhancement of magnon Kerr nonlinearity in cavity magnon- ics induced by coherent perfect absorption, Phys. Rev. B107, 064417 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    J. Xu, C. Zhong, X. Han, D. Jin, L. Jiang, and X. Zhang, Floquet Cavity Electromagnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 237201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Pishehvar, Z

    A. Pishehvar, Z. Wang, Y . Zhu, Y . Jiang, Z. Yan, F. Li, J. M. Jornet, J. M. Hu, L. Jiang, and X. Zhang, On-demand magnon resonance isolation in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 024053 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Stehlik, Y

    J. Stehlik, Y . Y . Liu, C. Eichler, T.R. Hartke, X. Mi, M. J. Gul- lans, J. M. Taylor, and J. R. Petta, Double Quantum Dot Floquet Gain Medium, Phys. Rev. X6, 041027 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Y . Han, X. Q. Luo, T. F. Li, W. Zhang, S. P. Wang, J.S. Tsai, F. Nori, and J. Q. You, Time-Domain Grating with a Periodically 7 Driven Qutrit, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 014053 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Sameti and M

    M. Sameti and M. J. Hartmann, Floquet engineering in super- conducting circuits: From arbitrary spin-spin interactions to the Kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. A99, 012333 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    X. L. Hei, X. L. Dong, J. Q. Chen, Y . F. Qiao, X. F. Pan, X. Y . Yao, J. C. Zheng, Y . M. Ren, X. W. Huo, and P. B. Li, Topolog- ical simulation and chiral spin-spin interaction in driven cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 044025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    R. Li, J. X. Peng, X. L. Feng, and M. Asjad, Enhancement of quantum effects via periodic modulation in a cavity magnome- chanical system, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 044081 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    J. Xie, H. Yuan, S. Ma, S. Gao, F. Li, and R. A. Duine, Sta- tionary quantum entanglement and steering between two distant macromagnets, Quantum Sci. Technol.8, 035022 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    S. Y . Guan, H. F. Wang, and X. Yi, Stationary Quantum En- tanglement and Asymmetric Steering in Cavity Magnonic Sys- tem with Floquet Field and Coherent Feedback, Adv. Quantum Technol.7, 2400281 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    S. F. Qi and J. Jing, Floquet generation of a magnonic NOON state, Phys. Rev. A107, 013702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Y . L. Ren, S. L. Ma, and F. L. Li, Chiral coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. A106, 053714 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    G. Q. Zhang, Y . P. Wang, and J. Q. You, Theory of the magnon Kerr effect in cavity magnonics, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. As- tron.62, 987511 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Y . P. Wang, G. Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Q. Luo, W. Xiong, S. P. Wang, T. F. Li, C. M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Magnon Kerr effect in a strongly coupled cavity-magnon system, Phys. Rev. B94, 224410 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Y . P. Wang, G. Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T. F. Li, C. M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Bistability of Cavity Magnon-Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 057202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    R. C. Shen, J. Li, Z. Y . Fan, Y . P. Wang, and J. Q. You, Me- chanical Bistability in Kerr-modified Cavity Magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 123601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    M. X. Bi, X. H. Yan, Y . Zhang, and Y . Xiao, Tristability of cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. B103, 104411 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    M. X. Bi, H. Fan, X. H. Yan, and Y . C. Lai, Folding State within a Hysteresis Loop: Hidden Multistability in Nonlinear Physical Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 137201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    J. M. P. Nair, D. Mukhopadhyay, and G. S. Agarwal, Ultralow threshold bistability and generation of long-lived mode in a dis- sipatively coupled nonlinear system: Application to magnonics, Phys. Rev. B103, 224401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    M. Wang, C. Kong, Z. Y . Sun, D. Zhang, Y . Y . Wu, and L. L. Zheng, Nonreciprocal high-order sidebands induced by magnon Kerr nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. A104, 033708 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    C. Zhao, Z. Yang, R. Peng, J. Yang, C. Li, and L. Zhou, Dissipative-coupling-induced transparency and high- order sidebands with Kerr nonlinearity in a cavity-magnonics system, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 044074 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    J. Chen, X. G. Fan, W. Xiong, D. Wang, and L. Ye, Nonrecipro- cal entanglement in cavity-magnon optomechanics, Phys. Rev. B108, 024105 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Ahmed, H

    R. Ahmed, H. Ali, A. Shehzad, S. K. Singh, A. Sohail, and M. C. de Oliveira, Nonreciprocal Multipartite Entanglement in a two-cavity magnomechanical system, arXiv:2405.16221

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    D. Kong, J. Xu, and F. Wang, Nonreciprocal entanglement of ferrimagnetic magnons and nitrogen-vacancy-center ensembles by Kerr nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 034061 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    H. Q. Zhang, S. S. Chu, J. S. Zhang, W. X. Zhong, and G. L. Cheng, Nonreciprocal magnon blockade based on nonlinear effects, Opt. Lett.49, 2009 (2024)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    D. G. Lai, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal quantum synchronization, Nat. Commun.16, 8491 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Xiong, M

    W. Xiong, M. Tian, G. Q. Zhang, and J. Q. You, Strong long- range spin-spin coupling via a Kerr magnon interface, Phys. Rev. B105, 245310 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    J. M. P. Nair, Z. Zhang, M. O. Scully, and G. S. Agarwal, Non- linear spin currents, Phys. Rev. B102, 104415 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    R. C. Shen, Y . P. Wang, J. Li, S. Y . Zhu, G. S. Agarwal, and J. Q. You, Long-Time Memory and Ternary Logic Gate Using a Multistable Cavity Magnonic System, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 183202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: The Dicke maser model, Ann. Phys.76, 360 (1973)

    work page 1973

  54. [54]

    Y . K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase transition in the dicke model of superradiance, Phys. Rev. A7, 831 (1973)

    work page 1973

  55. [55]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  56. [56]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Quantum Chaos Triggered by Precur- sors of a Quantum Phase Transition: The Dicke Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 044101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transi- tion in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    work page 2003

  58. [58]

    Dimer, B

    F. Dimer, B. Estienne, A. S. Parkins, and H. J. Carmichael, Proposed realization of the Dicke-model quantum phase transi- tion in an optical cavity QED system, Phys. Rev. A75, 013804 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cav- ity, Nature464, 1301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    L. J. Zou, D. Marcos, S. Diehl, S. Putz, J. Schmiedmayer, J. Ma- jer, and P. Rabl, Implementation of the Dicke Lattice Model in Hybrid Quantum System Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 023603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    M. P. Baden, K. J. Arnold, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Realization of the Dicke Model Using Cavity- Assisted Raman Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 020408 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    C. J. Zhu, L. L. Ping, Y . P. Yang, and G. S. Agarwal, Squeezed light induced symmetry breaking superradiant phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 073602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Chen, Z. Wu, J. Wang, J. Fan, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Observation of a superradiant quantum phase transition in an intracavity degenerate Fermi gas, Science373, 1359 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Z. Wu, J. Fan, X. Zhang, J. Qi, and H. Wu, Signatures of Prethermalization in a Quenched Cavity-Mediated Long-Range Interacting Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 243401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    J. F. Huang and L. Tian, Modulation-based superradiant phase transition in the strong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. A107, 063713 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    R. H. Zheng, W. Ning, Y . H. Chen, J. H. L ¨u, L. T. Shen, K. Xu, Y . R. Zhang, D. Xu, H. Li, Y . Xia, F. Wu, Z. B. Yang, A. Miranowicz, N. Lambert, D. Zheng, H. Fan, F. Nori, and S. B. Zheng, Observation of a Superradiant Phase Transition with Emergent Cat States, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 113601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    G. L. Zhu, C. S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X. Y . L ¨u, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal Superradiant Phase Transitions and Multicriti- cality in a Cavity QED System, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    X. Zhao, Q. Bin, W. Hou, Y . Li, Y . Li, Y . Lin, X. Y . L¨u, and J. Du, Experimental Observation of Parity-Symmetry-Protected Phenomena in the Quantum Rabi Model with a Trapped Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 193604 (2025). 8

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    G. Q. Zhang, Z. Chen, W. Xiong, C. H. Lam, and J. Q. You, Parity-symmetry-breaking quantum phase transition via para- metric drive in a cavity magnonic system, Phys. Rev. B104, 064423 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Y . Qin, S. C. Li, K. Li, and J. J. Song, Controllable quantum phase transition in a double-cavity magnonic system, Phys. Rev. B106, 054419 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Y . J. Xu, L. H. Zhai, P. Fu, S. J. Cheng, and G. Q. Zhang, Non- reciprocal quantum phase transition in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. A110, 043704 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Yamamoto, K

    T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, M. Watanabe, K. Matsuba, T. Miyazaki, W. D. Oliver, Y . Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Flux- driven Josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 042510 (2008)

    work page 2008

  73. [73]

    Zhong, E

    L. Zhong, E. P. Menzel, R. D. Candia, P. Eder, M. Ihmig, A. Baust, M. Haeberlein, E. Hoffmann, K. Inomata, T. Yamamoto, Y . Nakamura, E. Solano, F. Deppe, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Squeezing with a flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifer, New J. Phys.15, 125013 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    Z. R. Lin, K. Inomata, W. D. Oliver, K. Koshino, Y . Nakamura, J. S. Tsai, and T. Yamamoto, Single-shot readout of a super- conducting flux qubit with a flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 132602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  75. [75]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High Coopera- tivity in Coupled Microwave Resonator Ferrimagnetic Insulator Hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    R. G. E. Morris, A. F. van Loo, S. Kosen, and A. D. Karenowska, Strong coupling of magnons in a YIG sphere to photons in a planar superconducting resonator in the quantum limit, Sci. Rep.7, 11511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    J. T. Hou and L. Liu, Strong Coupling between Microwave Pho- tons and Nanomagnet Magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 107702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    M. Song, T. Polakovic, J. Lim, T. W. Cecil, J. Pearson, R. Divan, W. K. Kwok, U. Welp, A. Hoffmann, K. J. Kim, V . Novosad, and Y . Li, Single-shot magnon interference in a magnon-superconducting-resonator hybrid circuit, Nat. Com- mun.16, 3649 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    J. Qian, J. W. Rao, Y . S. Gui, Y . P. Wang, Z. H. An, and C. M. Hu, Manipulation of the zero-damping conditions and uni- directional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 192401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    J. Qian, J. Li, S. Y . Zhu, J. Q. You, and Y . P. Wang, Probing PT-Symmetry Breaking of Non-Hermitian Topological Pho- tonic States via Strong Photon-Magnon Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 156901 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.