pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2604.04057 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-05 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

CTD-Diff: Cooperative Time-Division Diffusion for Multi-User Semantic Communication Systems

Chengyang Liang , Dong Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords semantic communicationdiffusion modelsmulti-user cooperationTDMAsignal aggregationreverse diffusionlow SNRtransmission reliability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cooperative multi-user diffusion converts physical channel noise into diffusion noise to enhance semantic transmission reliability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the CTD-Diff framework to extend diffusion-based semantic communication from single links to multi-user wireless environments. It treats the noisy transmission process as part of the forward diffusion chain by using TDMA so that idle users overhear the active transmitter and act as collaborators. The receiver aggregates the direct signal with these cooperative copies to form a single conditioning input for the reverse diffusion process. This lets the model reconstruct the original semantic data by treating cumulative channel distortions as the kind of noise the diffusion process already knows how to remove. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach shows how network cooperation can turn a traditional liability into an asset for reliable generative transmission, especially when signal strength is weak.

Core claim

The CTD-Diff framework innovatively integrates the noisy wireless transmission process directly into the forward diffusion chain by designing a multi-user cooperation mechanism based on TDMA, where idle users act as semantic collaborators. The receiver employs direct signal aggregation to fuse the direct signal with cooperative copies, and this aggregated noisy semantic representation serves as the condition for the reverse diffusion process to reconstruct high-fidelity data by mitigating cumulative channel distortions.

What carries the argument

The TDMA-based multi-user cooperation mechanism with direct signal aggregation that produces a conditioning signal for the reverse diffusion process.

If this is right

  • CTD-Diff outperforms various baselines in reconstruction accuracy.
  • CTD-Diff improves perceptual quality of the reconstructed data.
  • The performance gains are largest under challenging low SNR conditions.
  • Converting physical channel noise into diffusion noise significantly enhances overall transmission reliability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same aggregation-plus-conditioning pattern could be tested in networks where users have different transmit powers or channel qualities.
  • If the reverse process remains stable, the framework might support adaptive TDMA slot allocation to maximize the number of useful overheard copies.
  • The approach suggests that diffusion models in communications may benefit from treating multi-path wireless effects as additional forward noise rather than separate error-correction stages.

Load-bearing premise

Direct signal aggregation of cooperative overhearing copies produces a conditioning signal whose cumulative distortions remain invertible by the reverse diffusion process without introducing new artifacts or requiring additional training adjustments.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures reconstruction accuracy when the number of cooperative overhearing copies is increased at fixed low SNR and finds no improvement or added artifacts that the diffusion model cannot remove would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04057 by Chengyang Liang, Dong Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the proposed semantic communication system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Architecture of the proposed conditional diffusion network in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the PSNR performance in different datasets with AWGN and Rayleigh fading. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the MS-SSIM performance in different datasets with AWGN and Rayleigh fading. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reconstruction Comparison With vs. Without Cooperation on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: PSNR Heatmap Across User Quantity in AWGN Channel. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: PSNR Heatmap Across User Quantity in Rayleigh Channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: MS-SSIM Comparison Under Cooperation vs. No Cooperation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Semantic communication (SemCom) has emerged as a transformative paradigm for efficient information transmission by emphasizing the exchange of task-relevant meaning rather than raw data. While diffusion-based SemCom models have demonstrated remarkable generative capabilities, existing studies predominantly focus on point-to-point links, overlooking the potential of multi-user (MU) cooperation in MU wireless environments. To address this limitation, we propose a Cooperative Time-Division Diffusion (CTD-Diff) framework. Unlike traditional approaches that view channel noise solely as a detriment, our framework innovatively integrates the noisy wireless transmission process directly into the forward diffusion chain. Specifically, we design a multi-user cooperation mechanism based on Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA), where idle users overhearing the active transmitter act as semantic collaborators. To maximize the signal fidelity, the receiver employs direct signal aggregation to fuse the direct signal with cooperative copies. This aggregated noisy semantic representation serves as the condition for the reverse diffusion process, allowing the receiver to reconstruct high-fidelity data by mitigating the cumulative channel distortions. By effectively converting physical channel noise into diffusion noise, the proposed method significantly enhances the transmission reliability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CTD-Diff outperforms various baselines regarding the reconstruction accuracy and the perceptual quality, particularly under challenging low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the CTD-Diff framework for multi-user semantic communication, which integrates physical channel noise directly into the forward diffusion process. It employs a TDMA-based cooperation mechanism where idle users overhear transmissions and the receiver performs direct signal aggregation of the direct link and cooperative copies to produce a conditioning signal for the reverse diffusion process, claiming improved reconstruction accuracy and perceptual quality especially under low-SNR conditions.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold and the performance claims are supported by rigorous experiments, the work could meaningfully advance semantic communication by reframing channel noise as a controllable diffusion component and exploiting multi-user cooperation, potentially enabling more reliable generative reconstruction in wireless settings than point-to-point diffusion baselines.

major comments (2)
  1. [Method] Method section (noise integration and aggregation): The claim that aggregated TDMA overhears can be fed directly as conditioning to a standard reverse diffusion process without introducing new artifacts rests on the unstated assumption that the effective noise remains isotropic Gaussian. No derivation of the aggregated noise variance (a random weighted sum across independent fading realizations) or proof of reverse-SDE stability under distribution mismatch is supplied; this is load-bearing for the invertibility guarantee.
  2. [Experiments] Experiments section: The abstract states that CTD-Diff 'outperforms various baselines' in reconstruction accuracy and perceptual quality under low SNR, yet no quantitative metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM, FID), baseline descriptions, dataset details, or ablation results appear in the provided text. Without these, the central empirical claim cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the theoretical and empirical requirements for our CTD-Diff framework. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method] Method section (noise integration and aggregation): The claim that aggregated TDMA overhears can be fed directly as conditioning to a standard reverse diffusion process without introducing new artifacts rests on the unstated assumption that the effective noise remains isotropic Gaussian. No derivation of the aggregated noise variance (a random weighted sum across independent fading realizations) or proof of reverse-SDE stability under distribution mismatch is supplied; this is load-bearing for the invertibility guarantee.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is required to justify feeding the aggregated signal as conditioning. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the statistics of the aggregated noise under TDMA cooperation. We will show that the effective noise is a weighted sum of independent zero-mean Gaussians (scaled by Rayleigh fading coefficients) whose variance can be expressed in closed form, and we will bound the deviation from isotropy. We will also provide a brief stability argument for the conditioned reverse SDE, establishing that the distribution mismatch remains controlled under the operating SNR range considered in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: The abstract states that CTD-Diff 'outperforms various baselines' in reconstruction accuracy and perceptual quality under low SNR, yet no quantitative metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM, FID), baseline descriptions, dataset details, or ablation results appear in the provided text. Without these, the central empirical claim cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the submitted version does not contain the supporting experimental details. We will expand the Experiments section to include quantitative results (PSNR, SSIM, FID), explicit baseline descriptions, dataset specifications, and ablation studies that isolate the contributions of TDMA cooperation and direct signal aggregation. These additions will be presented with tables and figures that directly substantiate the low-SNR performance claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: novel framework with external validation

full rationale

The paper presents CTD-Diff as a new construction that maps physical channel noise into the diffusion forward process via TDMA-based cooperative overhearing and direct signal aggregation, then conditions the reverse process on the aggregated signal. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed reconstruction gains to quantities defined by the same data or prior author results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained; performance claims rest on experimental comparison against baselines rather than any definitional or fitted-input loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the high-level framework description; the central claim rests on standard diffusion model assumptions and the unstated premise that aggregated cooperative noise remains useful conditioning.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Diffusion models can reconstruct semantic content when conditioned on aggregated noisy wireless signals
    Implicit in the reverse diffusion step described in the abstract
invented entities (1)
  • CTD-Diff framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To enable multi-user cooperation by integrating channel noise into the diffusion process via TDMA
    Newly proposed method name and architecture

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1205 out tokens · 40422 ms · 2026-05-13T17:02:36.864528+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Breaking the interference and fading gridlock in backscatter communications: State- of-the-art, design challenges, and future directions,

    B. Gu, D. Li, H. Ding, G. Wang, and C. Tellambura, “Breaking the interference and fading gridlock in backscatter communications: State- of-the-art, design challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 870–911, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Rethinking modern communication from semantic coding to semantic communication,

    K. Lu, Q. Zhou, R. Li, Z. Zhao, X. Chen, J. Wu, and H. Zhang, “Rethinking modern communication from semantic coding to semantic communication,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 158–164, Feb. 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    From data mirror to smart copilot: A survey on nextg semantic communication for propelling digital twin world into cognitive stage,

    F. Zhu, J. Chen, J. Wen, Y . Yang, C. Yi, Y . Tie, P. Zhang, J. Cai, D. Niyato, and M. Guizani, “From data mirror to smart copilot: A survey on nextg semantic communication for propelling digital twin world into cognitive stage,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 28, pp. 4915–4947, 2026

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Generative ai-enabled semantic communication: State-of-the-art, applications, and the way ahead,

    C. Liang and D. Li, “Generative ai-enabled semantic communication: State-of-the-art, applications, and the way ahead,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 28, pp. 3976–4015, 2026

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    Wireless semantic communi- cations for video conferencing,

    P. Jiang, C.-K. Wen, S. Jin, and G. Y . Li, “Wireless semantic communi- cations for video conferencing,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 230–244, Jan. 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    A novel lightweight joint source- channel coding design in semantic communications,

    X. Yu, D. Li, N. Zhang, and X. Shen, “A novel lightweight joint source- channel coding design in semantic communications,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 18 447–18 450, Jun. 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Semantic communications for speech recognition,

    Z. Weng, Z. Qin, and G. Y . Li, “Semantic communications for speech recognition,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2021, pp. 1–6

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Semantic communications for digital signals via carrier images,

    Z. Yan and D. Li, “Semantic communications for digital signals via carrier images,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1816– 1820, Jun. 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Communicate less, synthesize the rest: Latency-aware intent-based gen- erative semantic multicasting with diffusion models,

    X. Liu, M. B. Mashhadi, L. Qiao, Y . Ma, R. Tafazolli, and M. Bennis, “Communicate less, synthesize the rest: Latency-aware intent-based gen- erative semantic multicasting with diffusion models,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, Feb. 02, 2026, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2026.3660013

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2026.3660013 2026

  10. [10]

    Witt: A wireless image transmission transformer for semantic communications,

    K. Yang, S. Wang, J. Dai, K. Tan, K. Niu, and P. Zhang, “Witt: A wireless image transmission transformer for semantic communications,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), 2023, pp. 1–5

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Deep joint source- channel coding for wireless image transmission,

    E. Bourtsoulatze, D. Burth Kurka, and D. G ¨und¨uz, “Deep joint source- channel coding for wireless image transmission,”IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Networking, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 567–579, Sep. 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Deep joint source-channel coding for semantic communications,

    J. Xu, T.-Y . Tung, B. Ai, W. Chen, Y . Sun, and D. G ¨und¨uz, “Deep joint source-channel coding for semantic communications,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 42–48, Nov. 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    A gan-based semantic communication for text without csi,

    J. Mao, K. Xiong, M. Liu, Z. Qin, W. Chen, P. Fan, and K. B. Letaief, “A gan-based semantic communication for text without csi,”IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Networking, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 498–14 514, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Generative ai-driven semantic communication networks: Archi- tecture, technologies, and applications,

    C. Liang, H. Du, Y . Sun, D. Niyato, J. Kang, D. Zhao, and M. A. Imran, “Generative ai-driven semantic communication networks: Archi- tecture, technologies, and applications,”IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Networking, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 27–47, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Generative ai-driven semantic communication networks: Archi- tecture, technologies and applications,

    ——, “Generative ai-driven semantic communication networks: Archi- tecture, technologies and applications,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., pp. 1–1, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Cddm: Channel denoising diffusion models for wireless semantic communications,

    T. Wu, Z. Chen, D. He, L. Qian, Y . Xu, M. Tao, and W. Zhang, “Cddm: Channel denoising diffusion models for wireless semantic communications,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 168–11 183, Sep. 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Lightweight diffusion models for resource-constrained semantic com- munication,

    E. Grassucci, G. Pignata, G. Cicchetti, and D. Comminiello, “Lightweight diffusion models for resource-constrained semantic com- munication,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2743– 2747, Sep. 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Latent diffusion model-enabled low-latency semantic communication in the presence of semantic ambiguities and wireless channel noises,

    J. Pei, C. Feng, P. Wang, H. Tabassum, and D. Shi, “Latent diffusion model-enabled low-latency semantic communication in the presence of semantic ambiguities and wireless channel noises,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 4055–4072, May 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Multimodal and multiuser semantic communications for channel-level information fusion,

    X. Luo, R. Gao, H.-H. Chen, S. Chen, Q. Guo, and P. N. Suganthan, “Multimodal and multiuser semantic communications for channel-level information fusion,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 117–125, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Multi-user wireless image semantic transmission over mimo multiple access channels,

    B. Xie, Y . Wu, F. Shu, J. Wang, and W. Zhang, “Multi-user wireless image semantic transmission over mimo multiple access channels,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1864–1868, Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Knowledge distillation-based semantic communications for multiple users,

    C. Liu, Y . Zhou, Y . Chen, and S.-H. Yang, “Knowledge distillation-based semantic communications for multiple users,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7000–7012, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Dmce: Diffusion model channel enhancer for multi-user semantic communica- tion systems,

    Y . Zeng, X. He, X. Chen, H. Tong, Z. Yang, Y . Guo, and J. Hao, “Dmce: Diffusion model channel enhancer for multi-user semantic communica- tion systems,” inProc. International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2024, pp. 855–860

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Interference suppressed noma for semantic-aware communication networks,

    Y . Zhang, R. Zhong, Y . Liu, W. Xu, and P. Zhang, “Interference suppressed noma for semantic-aware communication networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 383–10 397, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Semantic- importance-aware communication over mimo fading channels,

    H. Liang, C. Dong, W. An, Z. Bao, X. Xu, and R. Meng, “Semantic- importance-aware communication over mimo fading channels,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 38 540–38 555, Sep. 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Trading computing power for reducing communication loads: A semantic communication perspective,

    G. Zheng, M. Wen, L. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Trading computing power for reducing communication loads: A semantic communication perspective,” IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Beamforming design for semantic-bit coexisting communication sys- tem,

    M. Zhang, G. Zhu, R. Jin, X. Chen, Q. Shi, C. Zhong, and K. Huang, “Beamforming design for semantic-bit coexisting communication sys- tem,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1262–1277, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Latency-aware generative semantic communications with pre-trained diffusion models,

    L. Qiao, M. B. Mashhadi, Z. Gao, C. H. Foh, P. Xiao, and M. Bennis, “Latency-aware generative semantic communications with pre-trained diffusion models,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2652–2656, Oct. 2024. 12

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Joint source–channel noise adding with adaptive denoising for diffusion-based semantic communications,

    C. Liang and D. Li, “Joint source–channel noise adding with adaptive denoising for diffusion-based semantic communications,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 45 909–45 912, Nov. 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 33, 2020, pp. 6840–6851

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Score-optimal diffusion schedules,

    C. Williams, A. Campbell, A. Doucet, and S. Syed, “Score-optimal diffusion schedules,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 37, 2024, pp. 107 960–107 983

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Mvjscc: Adaptive lightweight deepjscc for semantic image transmission,

    M. Xu, C.-T. Lam, Y . Liang, T. Qiu, B. K. Ng, and S.-K. Im, “Mvjscc: Adaptive lightweight deepjscc for semantic image transmission,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2516–2520, Aug. 2025

    work page 2025