arxiv: 2604.04174 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-05 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

CoALFake: Collaborative Active Learning with Human-LLM Co-Annotation for Cross-Domain Fake News Detection

Esma A\"imeur , Gilles Brassard , Dorsaf Sallami

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 16:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI

keywords fake news detectioncross-domain learningactive learningLLM annotationhuman-AI collaborationdomain adaptationannotation efficiency

0 comments

The pith

Human oversight paired with LLM annotations and domain-aware sampling enables effective cross-domain fake news detection at low cost.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces CoALFake to solve the narrow domain specificity and high labeling costs that limit current fake news detectors. It combines large language models for bulk annotation with human review to keep labels reliable, while domain embeddings and a specialized sampling method in active learning preserve both unique domain traits and shared patterns across them. A reader should care because this setup trains models that generalize without requiring expensive full human labeling for every new domain. Experiments on multiple datasets show the approach beats standard baselines even with minimal human input. The core idea is that selective human-LLM collaboration plus smart domain handling makes scalable, adaptable detection practical.

Core claim

CoALFake integrates human-LLM co-annotation with domain-aware active learning: LLMs handle scalable low-cost labeling under human supervision for reliability, domain embeddings capture both specific nuances and cross-domain patterns, and a domain-aware sampling strategy prioritizes diverse coverage so the resulting model becomes domain-agnostic and outperforms baselines across datasets while requiring only minimal human oversight.

What carries the argument

Human-LLM co-annotation integrated with domain embedding techniques and a domain-aware sampling strategy inside an active learning loop.

If this is right

Annotation costs drop substantially while detection performance holds or improves.
Models become domain-agnostic and generalize better to unseen domains.
Active learning prioritizes samples that cover multiple domains efficiently.
The method works with very small amounts of human review.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same co-annotation pattern could extend to other text classification tasks that suffer from domain shift.
Quantifying when LLM labels diverge from human ones could allow even lower human involvement.
Deployment on live news streams would test whether the domain sampling remains effective over time.

Load-bearing premise

LLM annotations stay reliable enough for training when combined with only limited human oversight and without losing key domain features through the embeddings.

What would settle it

An experiment where the CoALFake model trained with the proposed co-annotation and sampling performs no better than or worse than simple baselines on a set of highly dissimilar new domains would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

The proliferation of fake news across diverse domains highlights critical limitations in current detection systems, which often exhibit narrow domain specificity and poor generalization. Existing cross-domain approaches face two key challenges: (1) reliance on labelled data, which is frequently unavailable and resource intensive to acquire and (2) information loss caused by rigid domain categorization or neglect of domain-specific features. To address these issues, we propose CoALFake, a novel approach for cross-domain fake news detection that integrates Human-Large Language Model (LLM) co-annotation with domain-aware Active Learning (AL). Our method employs LLMs for scalable, low-cost annotation while maintaining human oversight to ensure label reliability. By integrating domain embedding techniques, the CoALFake dynamically captures both domain specific nuances and cross-domain patterns, enabling the training of a domain agnostic model. Furthermore, a domain-aware sampling strategy optimizes sample acquisition by prioritizing diverse domain coverage. Experimental results across multiple datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms various baselines. Our results emphasize that human-LLM co-annotation is a highly cost-effective approach that delivers excellent performance. Evaluations across several datasets show that CoALFake consistently outperforms a range of existing baselines, even with minimal human oversight.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

CoALFake combines human-LLM co-annotation with domain-aware active learning for cross-domain fake news detection, but the abstract gives no numbers or error analysis to check the performance claims.

read the letter

The quick read is that this paper offers a method called CoALFake that uses LLMs to generate most labels for fake news data across domains, keeps a human in the loop for corrections, and applies active learning with domain embeddings to pick samples that cover variety without dropping specifics. The goal is a detector that adapts when new topics appear without needing full new labeled sets each time. That framing matches a real need in misinformation work where domains shift fast and labeling costs add up. The integration of co-annotation with domain-aware sampling is the clearest new piece; prior cross-domain methods often treat domains as fixed buckets or ignore their features, so this tries to keep both shared patterns and local cues. If the experiments hold, the cost-effectiveness angle could matter for anyone scaling detectors in practice. The main weakness is the lack of visible evidence. The abstract states consistent outperformance and excellent results with minimal oversight but supplies no accuracy numbers, baseline details, dataset sizes, override rates, or domain-stratified error checks. Without those, it is impossible to see whether the LLM labels stay reliable or introduce biases that the embeddings are meant to fix. The stress-test concern lands here: if LLM mistakes track with domain-specific language, the training signal could be skewed even with light human review. The full paper may contain the missing tables and ablations, but based on what is shown the central assumption stays untested. This is for researchers building adaptable detection systems who already work with active learning or human-AI labeling loops. A reader who wants concrete numbers and reproducibility checks would get value only if the experiments section delivers them. I would send it for peer review. The problem is timely and the setup is coherent, so referees could usefully press on the empirical gaps.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CoALFake, a framework integrating human-LLM co-annotation with domain-aware active learning for cross-domain fake news detection. It uses LLMs for scalable low-cost labeling under human oversight, domain embeddings to capture both specific and cross-domain patterns, and a sampling strategy prioritizing diverse domain coverage. The central claim is that this yields consistent outperformance over baselines across multiple datasets, even with minimal human oversight, while being highly cost-effective.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold with proper validation, the work could meaningfully advance cost-effective cross-domain detection by reducing reliance on fully human-labeled data while preserving domain nuances, with potential applicability to other low-resource NLP tasks requiring generalization.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim of consistent outperformance over baselines is asserted without any metrics, baseline names, dataset sizes, statistical significance tests, or ablation results, rendering the central empirical result unverifiable from the provided evidence.
[Method/Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: the assumption that LLM-generated labels remain sufficiently accurate under minimal human oversight lacks any quantitative support such as human-LLM agreement rates, fraction of overrides, or domain-stratified error analysis; if LLM errors correlate with the domain-specific cues the embeddings are intended to capture, both generalization and cost-effectiveness claims are undermined.
[Experiments] Experiments: no ablation or analysis is described showing that the domain embedding plus sampling strategy preserves domain-specific features without information loss, which is load-bearing for the cross-domain generalization argument.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the final two sentences redundantly restate the outperformance result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which helps clarify the presentation of our empirical claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested changes in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of consistent outperformance over baselines is asserted without any metrics, baseline names, dataset sizes, statistical significance tests, or ablation results, rendering the central empirical result unverifiable from the provided evidence.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should provide concrete evidence to support the central claim. In the revised version, we will expand the abstract to explicitly name the baselines (e.g., standard cross-domain methods and active learning variants), report key metrics such as F1-scores and accuracy across the evaluated datasets, include dataset sizes, and reference the statistical significance tests (paired t-tests) already performed in the Experiments section. This will make the outperformance claims directly verifiable. revision: yes
Referee: [Method/Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: the assumption that LLM-generated labels remain sufficiently accurate under minimal human oversight lacks any quantitative support such as human-LLM agreement rates, fraction of overrides, or domain-stratified error analysis; if LLM errors correlate with the domain-specific cues the embeddings are intended to capture, both generalization and cost-effectiveness claims are undermined.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit validation of the co-annotation reliability. Although the manuscript describes human oversight, it does not currently report quantitative metrics. In the revision, we will add a dedicated analysis subsection reporting human-LLM agreement rates (Cohen's kappa), the fraction of LLM labels overridden by humans, and domain-stratified error rates. This will directly address potential correlations between LLM errors and domain-specific cues captured by the embeddings. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments: no ablation or analysis is described showing that the domain embedding plus sampling strategy preserves domain-specific features without information loss, which is load-bearing for the cross-domain generalization argument.

Authors: We agree that an explicit ablation is necessary to substantiate the role of the domain embedding and sampling strategy. We will add a new ablation study in the Experiments section comparing the full CoALFake model against variants that remove the domain embedding component or the domain-aware sampling strategy. Results will include metrics on domain-specific feature preservation (e.g., intra-domain vs. cross-domain performance gaps) to demonstrate that these elements improve generalization without substantial information loss. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical method with no self-referential derivations or load-bearing self-citations

full rationale

The paper proposes CoALFake as an empirical system combining human-LLM co-annotation, domain embeddings, and domain-aware active learning sampling. All central claims rest on experimental comparisons to baselines across multiple datasets rather than any derivation chain, equations, or fitted parameters renamed as predictions. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness theorems or ansatzes; the method is presented as a practical integration whose performance is externally validated by outperformance metrics. This is the standard non-circular case for applied ML papers whose value is measured by benchmark results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in sufficient detail to enumerate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 909 out tokens · 55191 ms · 2026-05-13T16:41:45.956674+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Sallami, D., Gueddiche, A., A ¨ımeur, E.: From hype to reality: Revealing the accuracy and robustness of transformer-based models for fake news detection (2023)

work page 2023
[2]

Journal of Computational Social Science8(1), 1–38 (2025)

Sallami, D., A ¨ımeur, E.: Exploring beyond detection: a review on fake news prevention and mitigation techniques. Journal of Computational Social Science8(1), 1–38 (2025)

work page 2025
[3]

In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

Li, J., Wang, L., He, J., Zhang, Y ., Liu, A.: Improving rumor detection by class- based adversarial domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 6634–6642 (2023)

work page 2023
[4]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, vol

A ¨ımeur, E., Brassard, G., Sallami, D.: Too focused on accuracy to notice the fallout: Towards socially responsible fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, vol. 8, pp. 55–65 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Silva, A., Luo, L., Karunasekera, S., Leckie, C.: Embracing domain differences in fake news: Cross-domain fake news detection using multi-modal data. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 557–565 (2021)

work page 2021
[6]

IEEE Access (2023)

Wang, D., Zhang, W., Wu, W., Guo, X.: Soft-label for multi-domain fake news detection. IEEE Access (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08143 (2022)

Lin, H., Ma, J., Chen, L., Yang, Z., Cheng, M., Chen, G.: Detect rumors in microblog posts for low-resource domains via adversarial contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08143 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity

Lu, Y ., Bartolo, M., Moore, A., Riedel, S., Stenetorp, P.: Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08786 (2021)

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

In: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp

Ma, X., Zhang, Y ., Ding, K., Yang, J., Wu, J., Fan, H.: On fake news detection with llm enhanced semantics mining. In: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 508–521 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Neural Computing and Applications, 1–13 (2025)

Wang, X., Meng, J., Zhao, D., Meng, X., Sun, H.: Fake news detection based on multi- modal domain adaptation. Neural Computing and Applications, 1–13 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03316 (2020) 20

Han, Y ., Karunasekera, S., Leckie, C.: Graph neural networks with continual learning for fake news detection from social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03316 (2020) 20

work page arXiv 2007
[12]

In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp

Nan, Q., Cao, J., Zhu, Y ., Wang, Y ., Li, J.: Mdfend: Multi-domain fake news detec- tion. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 3343–3347 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

In: CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, pp

Liang, C., Zhang, Y ., Li, X., Zhang, J., Yu, Y .: Fudfend: fuzzy-domain for multi-domain fake news detection. In: CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, pp. 45–57 (2022). Springer

work page 2022
[14]

In: 2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp

Rastogi, S., Gill, S.S., Bansal, D.: An adaptive approach for fake news detection in social media: single vs cross domain. In: 2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 1401–1405 (2021). IEEE

work page 2021
[15]

In: International Symposium on Foundations and Practice of Security, pp

Amri, S., Sallami, D., A ¨ımeur, E.: Exmulf: An explainable multimodal content-based fake news detection system. In: International Symposium on Foundations and Practice of Security, pp. 177–187 (2021). Springer

work page 2021
[16]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Wang, Y ., Yang, W., Ma, F., Xu, J., Zhong, B., Deng, Q., Gao, J.: Weak supervi- sion for fake news detection via reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 516–523 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp

Ren, Y ., Wang, B., Zhang, J., Chang, Y .: Adversarial active learning based hetero- geneous graph neural network for fake news detection. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 452–461 (2020). IEEE

work page 2020
[18]

Online Social Networks and Media33, 100244 (2023)

Barnab `o, G., Siciliano, F., Castillo, C., Leonardi, S., Nakov, P., Da San Martino, G., Silvestri, F.: Deep active learning for misinformation detection using geometric deep learning. Online Social Networks and Media33, 100244 (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

SN Computer Science5(5), 470 (2024)

Folino, F., Folino, G., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L., Zicari, P.: Towards data-and compute- efficient fake-news detection: An approach combining active learning and pre-trained language models. SN Computer Science5(5), 470 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

In: The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Xiao, R., Dong, Y ., Zhao, J., Wu, R., Lin, M., Chen, G., Wang, H.: Freeal: Towards human-free active learning in the era of large language models. In: The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

work page 2023
[21]

In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pp

Zhang, R., Li, Y ., Ma, Y ., Zhou, M., Zou, L.: Llmaaa: Making large language mod- els as active annotators. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pp. 13088–13103 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

In: 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pp

Shahapure, K.R., Nicholas, C.: Cluster quality analysis using silhouette score. In: 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pp. 747–748 (2020). IEEE

work page 2020
[23]

Advances in neural information processing systems33, 1877–1901 (2020) 21

Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A.,et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 1877–1901 (2020) 21

work page 1901
[24]

Liu, J., Shen, D., Zhang, Y ., Dolan, B., Carin, L., Chen, W.: What makes good in-context examples for gpt-3? arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06804 (2021)

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks

Reimers, N.: Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084 (2019)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908
[26]

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2022)

Lin, S., Hilton, J., Evans, O.: Teaching models to express their uncertainty in words. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

In: The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

Wang, X., Wei, J., Schuurmans, D., Le, Q.V ., Chi, E.H., Narang, S., Chowdhery, A., Zhou, D.: Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. In: The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

Xiong, M., Hu, Z., Lu, X., LI, Y ., Fu, J., He, J., Hooi, B.: Can llms express their uncertainty? an empirical evaluation of confidence elicitation in llms. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (2023)

work page 2023
[29]

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research70, 1373–1411 (2021)

Northcutt, C., Jiang, L., Chuang, I.: Confident learning: Estimating uncertainty in dataset labels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research70, 1373–1411 (2021)

work page 2021
[30]

Big data8(3), 171–188 (2020)

Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: Fakenewsnet: A data repository with news content, social context, and spatiotemporal information for studying fake news on social media. Big data8(3), 171–188 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00885 (2020)

Cui, L., Lee, D.: Coaid: Covid-19 healthcare misinformation dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00885 (2020)

work page arXiv 2006
[32]

In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp

Shu, K., Cui, L., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: defend: Explainable fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 395–405 (2019)

work page 2019
[33]

In: CIKM (Workshops), vol

Silva, A., Han, Y ., Luo, L., Karunasekera, S., Leckie, C.: Embedding partial propagation network for fake news early detection. In: CIKM (Workshops), vol. 2699 (2020)

work page 2020
[34]

In: Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp

Zhou, X., Wu, J., Zafarani, R.: : Similarity-aware multi-modal fake news detection. In: Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 354–367 (2020). Springer

work page 2020
[35]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering35(7), 7178–7191 (2022)

Zhu, Y ., Sheng, Q., Cao, J., Nan, Q., Shu, K., Wu, M., Wang, J., Zhuang, F.: Memory- guided multi-view multi-domain fake news detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering35(7), 7178–7191 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

In: Proceed- ings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp

Nan, Q., Wang, D., Zhu, Y ., Sheng, Q., Shi, Y ., Cao, J., Li, J.: Improving fake news detection of influential domain via domain-and instance-level transfer. In: Proceed- ings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 2834–2848 (2022)

work page 2022
[37]

Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey (2009) 22

work page 2009
[38]

In: AAAI, vol

Culotta, A., McCallum, A.: Reducing labeling effort for structured prediction tasks. In: AAAI, vol. 5, pp. 746–751 (2005)

work page 2005
[39]

In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp

Yuan, M., Lin, H.-T., Boyd-Graber, J.: Cold-start active learning through self-supervised language modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 7935–7948 (2020)

work page 2020
[40]

In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: V olume 2, Short Papers (2017)

Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Mikolov, T.: Bag of tricks for efficient text clas- sification. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: V olume 2, Short Papers (2017). Association for Computational Linguistics

work page 2017
[41]

In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp

Wang, Z.: Zero-shot knowledge distillation from a decision-based black-box model. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 10675–10685 (2021). PMLR

work page 2021
[42]

Min, Z., Ge, Q., Tai, C.: Why the pseudo label based semi-supervised learning algorithm is effective? arXiv e-prints, 2211 (2022)

work page 2022
[43]

In: 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop, pp

Skeppstedt, M.: Annotating named entities in clinical text by combining pre-annotation and active learning. In: 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop, pp. 74–80 (2013)

work page 2013
[44]

Quality and efficiency of manual annotation: Pre-annotation bias

Mikulov ´a, M., Straka, M., ˇStˇep´anek, J., ˇStˇep´ankov´a, B., Hajiˇc, J.: Quality and efficiency of manual annotation: Pre-annotation bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09307 (2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[45]

Journal of biomedical informatics 50, 162–172 (2014) 23

South, B.R., Mowery, D., Suo, Y ., Leng, J., Ferr ´andez, O., Meystre, S.M., Chapman, W.W.: Evaluating the effects of machine pre-annotation and an interactive annotation interface on manual de-identification of clinical text. Journal of biomedical informatics 50, 162–172 (2014) 23

work page 2014