pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04572 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.CR

Digital Privacy in IoT: Exploring Challenges, Approaches and Open Issues

Shini Girija , Pranav M. Pawar , Raja Muthalagu , Mithun Mukherjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR
keywords IoT privacyAURA-IoTdigital privacy risksprivacy-enhancing technologiesAI in IoTdynamic consent
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multi-layered framework called AURA-IoT can mitigate AI-driven privacy risks in IoT systems by combining adversarial robustness, explainability, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys privacy challenges arising as IoT devices proliferate in healthcare, smart cities, and home automation, accelerated by events like the COVID-19 pandemic. It introduces a taxonomy that sorts risks into five categories—identity-oriented, behavioral, inference, data manipulation, and regulatory—using the IEEE Digital Privacy Model. Existing solutions such as encryption, blockchain, federated learning, differential privacy, and reinforcement learning are reviewed for their roles in data confidentiality and trust management. The central proposal is AURA-IoT, a futuristic multi-layered structure that adds mechanisms for adversarial robustness, transparency, fairness, and compliance to counter AI-specific threats. A reader would care because successful adoption could reduce exposure of personally identifiable information while maintaining usable IoT services.

Core claim

The paper claims that AURA-IoT, a futuristic framework, tackles AI-driven privacy risks through a multi-layered structure integrating adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement mechanisms to ensure digital privacy, security, and accountable IoT operations.

What carries the argument

AURA-IoT, the proposed multi-layered framework that stacks adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement to manage privacy risks.

Load-bearing premise

That integrating the listed mechanisms into a multi-layered structure will ensure digital privacy and security in real IoT deployments.

What would settle it

A controlled testbed deployment of AURA-IoT that measures actual reduction in privacy breaches or inference attacks compared with standard IoT systems without the framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04572 by Mithun Mukherjee, Pranav M. Pawar, Raja Muthalagu, Shini Girija.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: IoT devices in digital privacy domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Largest data privacy violation fines [13] Shini Girija et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 28 of 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Taxonomy of digital privacy risks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Digital privacy laws Shini Girija et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 29 of 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AIoT applications with privacy-enhancing features [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Challenges in employing AI for Digital Privacy in IoT Shini Girija et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 30 of 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: General ML/DL framework solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: General FL framework solution. Shini Girija et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 31 of 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: General RL framework solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: AURA-IoT futuristic framework Shini Girija et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 32 of 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: AURA-IoT system workflow Shini Girija et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 33 of 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Privacy has always been a critical issue in the digital era, particularly with the increasing use of Internet of Things (IoT) devices. As the IoT continues to transform industries such as healthcare, smart cities, and home automation, it has also introduced serious challenges regarding the security of sensitive and private data. This paper examines the complex landscape of digital privacy in IoT ecosystems, highlighting the need to protect personally identifiable information (PII) of individuals and uphold their rights to digital independence. Global events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have accelerated the adoption of IoT, raising concerns about privacy and data protection. This paper provides an in-depth examination of digital privacy risks in the IoT domain and introduces a clear taxonomy for evaluating them using the IEEE Digital Privacy Model. The proposed framework categorizes privacy risks into five types: identity-oriented, behavioral, inference, data manipulation, and regulatory risks. We review existing digital privacy solutions, including encryption technologies, blockchain, federated learning, differential privacy, reinforcement learning, AI, and dynamic consent mechanisms, to mitigate these risks. We also highlight how these privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) help with data confidentiality, access control, and trust management. Additionally, this study presents AURA-IoT, a futuristic framework that tackles AI-driven privacy risks through a multi-layered structure. AURA-IoT integrates adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement mechanisms to ensure digital privacy, security, and accountable IoT operations. Finally, we discuss ongoing challenges and potential research directions for integrating AI and encryption-based privacy solutions to achieve comprehensive digital privacy in future IoT systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper surveys digital privacy challenges in IoT, categorizes risks into five types (identity-oriented, behavioral, inference, data manipulation, and regulatory) using the IEEE Digital Privacy Model, reviews privacy-enhancing technologies such as encryption, blockchain, federated learning, differential privacy, reinforcement learning, AI, and dynamic consent, and proposes AURA-IoT as a multi-layered futuristic framework that integrates adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement to address AI-driven privacy risks and ensure digital privacy, security, and accountable IoT operations.

Significance. The taxonomy and review of existing PETs provide a useful organization of the literature on IoT privacy risks and mitigation approaches. If the AURA-IoT framework were developed with concrete architecture, component interaction rules, and supporting analysis or evaluation, it could serve as a high-level blueprint for integrating AI safety mechanisms with privacy controls in IoT systems, advancing research on accountable and secure deployments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and AURA-IoT description] Abstract and section describing AURA-IoT: the central claim that the framework 'tackles AI-driven privacy risks through a multi-layered structure integrating adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement mechanisms to ensure digital privacy, security, and accountable IoT operations' is unsupported. The manuscript supplies only a high-level list of components and a risk taxonomy, with no layer definitions, data-flow specifications, composition rules, threat-model mappings, pseudocode, or metrics demonstrating how the mechanisms interact to close the identified risk categories (e.g., inference attacks).
minor comments (1)
  1. The review would be strengthened by adding explicit citations for the IEEE Digital Privacy Model and for each reviewed technology (encryption, blockchain, federated learning, etc.) to allow readers to trace the sources.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our survey paper. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to better reflect the conceptual scope of the AURA-IoT framework.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and AURA-IoT description] Abstract and section describing AURA-IoT: the central claim that the framework 'tackles AI-driven privacy risks through a multi-layered structure integrating adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement mechanisms to ensure digital privacy, security, and accountable IoT operations' is unsupported. The manuscript supplies only a high-level list of components and a risk taxonomy, with no layer definitions, data-flow specifications, composition rules, threat-model mappings, pseudocode, or metrics demonstrating how the mechanisms interact to close the identified risk categories (e.g., inference attacks).

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation that the AURA-IoT description is high-level. The paper is a survey that reviews IoT privacy risks via the IEEE model, categorizes them into five types, and surveys PETs including encryption, blockchain, federated learning, differential privacy, reinforcement learning, AI, and dynamic consent. AURA-IoT is introduced as a futuristic conceptual framework to highlight integration opportunities for addressing AI-driven risks, not as a fully specified system. We agree that the abstract and section overstate the framework's readiness by implying concrete interactions and closure of risks without providing layer definitions, data flows, composition rules, or evaluations. We will revise the abstract to describe AURA-IoT explicitly as a high-level blueprint for future research and expand the section with a conceptual mapping of components to risk categories (e.g., adversarial robustness for inference attacks, dynamic consent for regulatory risks). We will also add a limitations paragraph noting the absence of implementation details or metrics, which would require a follow-on engineering paper. These changes will align the claims with the survey's scope while preserving the framework's value as an organizing vision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: AURA-IoT is a high-level conceptual proposal without derivations or reductions

full rationale

The paper is a survey-style review that taxonomizes IoT privacy risks using the IEEE Digital Privacy Model and lists existing PETs (encryption, blockchain, federated learning, etc.) before outlining AURA-IoT as a multi-layered integration of adversarial robustness, explainability, dynamic consent, and similar mechanisms. No equations, parameter fittings, formal derivations, or self-referential definitions appear in the provided text. The central claim that the listed components 'ensure' privacy is an assertion rather than a derived result that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citation chains, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing way. The absence of any mathematical or algorithmic derivation chain means none of the enumerated circularity patterns can be exhibited with a specific quote and reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on the domain assumption that IoT systems inherently collect sensitive personal data and that AI components introduce additional privacy risks; it introduces one invented entity (the AURA-IoT framework) without independent evidence or falsifiable predictions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption IoT ecosystems collect and process personally identifiable information that requires protection to uphold individual rights.
    Stated in the opening sentences of the abstract as the motivation for the entire study.
invented entities (1)
  • AURA-IoT no independent evidence
    purpose: A multi-layered framework to mitigate AI-driven privacy risks in IoT through adversarial robustness, explainability, transparency, fairness, compliance, dynamic consent, and policy enforcement.
    Introduced in the abstract as the central new contribution; no implementation, evaluation, or external validation is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 1571 out tokens · 85488 ms · 2026-05-10T20:06:12.867349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Themeaningofprivacyinthedigitalera.InternationalJournalofSecurityandPrivacyinPervasive Computing (IJSPPC), 15(1):1–15, March 2023

    JacksonAdamsandHalaAlmahmoud. Themeaningofprivacyinthedigitalera.InternationalJournalofSecurityandPrivacyinPervasive Computing (IJSPPC), 15(1):1–15, March 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    A comprehensive analysis of privacy protection techniques developed for covid-19 pandemic.IEEE Access, 9:164159–164187, November 2021

    Abdul Majeed and Seong Oun Hwang. A comprehensive analysis of privacy protection techniques developed for covid-19 pandemic.IEEE Access, 9:164159–164187, November 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Being digital to being vulnerable: does digital transformation allure a data breach?Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 1(1/2):111–137, November 2022

    Santhosh Srinivas and Huigang Liang. Being digital to being vulnerable: does digital transformation allure a data breach?Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 1(1/2):111–137, November 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Impact of consumer data privacy laws.https://www.statista.com/statistics/1403400/ us-uk-firms-transfer-data-internationally-impact-law/, 2023

    Statista. Impact of consumer data privacy laws.https://www.statista.com/statistics/1403400/ us-uk-firms-transfer-data-internationally-impact-law/, 2023. Accessed: March 23, 2025

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Digital privacy.Management Science, 69(6):3157–3173, August 2023

    Itay P Fainmesser, Andrea Galeotti, and Ruslan Momot. Digital privacy.Management Science, 69(6):3157–3173, August 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Springer, May 2024

    AbdulSalam.Internetofthingsforsustainability:perspectivesinprivacy,cybersecurity,andfuturetrends.InInternetofthingsforsustainable community development: wireless communications, sensing, and systems, pages 299–326. Springer, May 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    PhD thesis, Robert Morris University, 2020

    Trisha Bartlett.Privacy and Security Management Practices of Emerging Technologies: Internet of Things. PhD thesis, Robert Morris University, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey.Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(2):234–247, 2023

    Yan Huang, Yi Joy Li, and Zhipeng Cai. Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey.Big Data Mining and Analytics, 6(2):234–247, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Aninvestigationofvarioussecurityandprivacyissuesininternetofthings.MaterialsToday:Proceedings, 80:3393–3397, 2023

    RichaSinghaiandRamaSushil. Aninvestigationofvarioussecurityandprivacyissuesininternetofthings.MaterialsToday:Proceedings, 80:3393–3397, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    A survey on security threats and countermeasures in iot to achieve users confidentiality and reliability.Materials Today: Proceedings, 81:377–382, 2023

    Kholoud Y Najmi, Mohammed A AlZain, Mehedi Masud, NZ Jhanjhi, Jehad Al-Amri, and Mohammed Baz. A survey on security threats and countermeasures in iot to achieve users confidentiality and reliability.Materials Today: Proceedings, 81:377–382, 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Iot: Internet of threats? a survey of practical security vulnerabilities in real iot devices.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5):8182–8201, 2019

    Francesca Meneghello, Matteo Calore, Daniel Zucchetto, Michele Polese, and Andrea Zanella. Iot: Internet of threats? a survey of practical security vulnerabilities in real iot devices.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5):8182–8201, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Facebook and cambridge analytica: An unholy alliance

    Mitchell Matara, Guillermo D Rose, and Peter Conklin. Facebook and cambridge analytica: An unholy alliance. 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Statista Research Department. Largest data privacy violation fines, penalties, settlements worldwide as of january 2025.https: //www.statista.com/statistics/1170520/worldwide-data-breach-fines-settlements/, 2025. Accessed: 2025-07-07

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    A flexible encryption technique for the internet of things environment.Ad Hoc Networks, 106:102240, 2020

    Saci Medileh, Abdelkader Laouid, Reinhardt Euler, Ahcène Bounceur, Mohammad Hammoudeh, Muath AlShaikh, Amna Eleyan, Osama Ahmed Khashan, et al. A flexible encryption technique for the internet of things environment.Ad Hoc Networks, 106:102240, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    An efficient lightweight cryptographic algorithm for iot security

    Muyideen Abdulraheem, Joseph Bamidele Awotunde, Rasheed Gbenga Jimoh, and Idowu Dauda Oladipo. An efficient lightweight cryptographic algorithm for iot security. InInternational Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Applications, pages 444–456. Springer, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(3):1622–1658, 2021

    Dinh C Nguyen, Ming Ding, Pubudu N Pathirana, Aruna Seneviratne, Jun Li, and H Vincent Poor. Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(3):1622–1658, 2021

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4):3347–3366, 2021

    Qinbin Li, Zeyi Wen, Zhaomin Wu, Sixu Hu, Naibo Wang, Yuan Li, Xu Liu, and Bingsheng He. A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4):3347–3366, 2021. Shini Girija et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 22 of 27 IoT Digital Privacy

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Privacy preserving load control of residential microgrid via deep reinforcement learning.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(5):4079–4089, 2021

    Zhaoming Qin, Di Liu, Haochen Hua, and Junwei Cao. Privacy preserving load control of residential microgrid via deep reinforcement learning.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(5):4079–4089, 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Privacy-cost management in smart meters using deep reinforcement learning

    Mohammadhadi Shateri, Francisco Messina, Pablo Piantanida, and Fabrice Labeau. Privacy-cost management in smart meters using deep reinforcement learning. In2020 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe), pages 929–933. IEEE, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    On the use of artificial intelligence to deal with privacy in iot systems: A systematic literature review.Journal of Systems and Software, 193:111475, 2022

    Giammaria Giordano, Fabio Palomba, and Filomena Ferrucci. On the use of artificial intelligence to deal with privacy in iot systems: A systematic literature review.Journal of Systems and Software, 193:111475, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Saurabh Suman Choudhuri and Jayesh Jhurani. Privacy-preserving techniques in artificial intelligence applications for industrial iot driven digital transformation.International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(11):624–632, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Ai in data privacy and security.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning (IJAIML), 3(01):35–49, 2024

    Siva Karthik Devineni. Ai in data privacy and security.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning (IJAIML), 3(01):35–49, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025

    PSelvakumar,PSudheer,andNandiniKannan.Balancinginnovationandprivacy:Understandingaiinthedigitalworld.InDigitalCitizenship and the Future of AI Engagement, Ethics, and Privacy, pages 279–304. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Recentadvancesofdifferentialprivacyincentralizeddeeplearning:Asystematicsurvey

    LeaDemelius,RomanKern,andAndreasTrügler. Recentadvancesofdifferentialprivacyincentralizeddeeplearning:Asystematicsurvey. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(6):1–28, 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Quantum differential privacy in the local model.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2025

    Armando Angrisani and Elham Kashefi. Quantum differential privacy in the local model.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Differentialprivacyforiot-enabledcritical infrastructure: A comprehensive survey.IEEE Access, 9:153276–153304, 2021

    MuhammadAkbarHusnoo,AdnanAnwar,RiponKChakrabortty,RobinDoss,andMikeJRyan. Differentialprivacyforiot-enabledcritical infrastructure: A comprehensive survey.IEEE Access, 9:153276–153304, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Local differential privacy-based federated learning for internet of things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(11):8836–8853, 2020

    Yang Zhao, Jun Zhao, Mengmeng Yang, Teng Wang, Ning Wang, Lingjuan Lyu, Dusit Niyato, and Kwok-Yan Lam. Local differential privacy-based federated learning for internet of things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(11):8836–8853, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Privacy for iot: informed consent management in smart buildings.Future Generation Computer Systems, 145:367–383, 2023

    Chehara Pathmabandu, John Grundy, Mohan Baruwal Chhetri, and Zubair Baig. Privacy for iot: informed consent management in smart buildings.Future Generation Computer Systems, 145:367–383, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Mechanismsformeaningfulconsentininternet of things

    SusanYLWakenshaw,CarstenMaple,MCSchraefel,RichardGomer,andKevinGhirardello. Mechanismsformeaningfulconsentininternet of things. InLiving in the Internet of Things: Cybersecurity of the IoT-2018, pages 1–10. IET, 2018

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Information privacy concern at individual, group, organization and societal level-a literature review

    Dillip Kumar Rath and Ajit Kumar. Information privacy concern at individual, group, organization and societal level-a literature review. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 18(2):171–186, 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Evaluatingsecurityandprivacyissuesofsocialnetworksbased information systems in industry 4.0.Enterprise Information Systems, 16(10-11):1694–1710, 2022

    JoseRamonSaura,DomingoRibeiro-Soriano,andDanielPalacios-Marqués. Evaluatingsecurityandprivacyissuesofsocialnetworksbased information systems in industry 4.0.Enterprise Information Systems, 16(10-11):1694–1710, 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Acomprehensiveexaminationofdigitalprivacyincrowdsourcingapplications

    SantoshKumarandMohannadFaisal. Acomprehensiveexaminationofdigitalprivacyincrowdsourcingapplications. In2024International Conference on Automation and Computation (AUTOCOM), pages 352–357. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    The privacy and security challenges of crowdsourcing activities a systematic literature review

    Muhammad Faisal Shahzad. The privacy and security challenges of crowdsourcing activities a systematic literature review. 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    A taxonomy and gap-analysis in digital privacy education

    Sumit Kumar Paul and DA Knox. A taxonomy and gap-analysis in digital privacy education. InInternational Symposium on Foundations and Practice of Security, pages 221–235. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    The analysis of security and privacy risks in smart education environments.Journal of Smart Cities and Society, 1(1):17–29, 2022

    Anton Kamenskih. The analysis of security and privacy risks in smart education environments.Journal of Smart Cities and Society, 1(1):17–29, 2022

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Right to digital privacy: a technological intervention of blockchain and big data analytics

    Shruti Kasera, Anita Gehlot, Vaibhav Uniyal, Shweta Pandey, Gunjan Chhabra, and Kapil Joshi. Right to digital privacy: a technological intervention of blockchain and big data analytics. In2023 International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Application (ICIDCA), pages 1122–1127. IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Post-quantum era privacy protection for intelligent infrastructures.IEEE Access, 9:36038–36077, 2021

    LukasMalina,PetrDzurenda,SaraRicci,JanHajny,GautamSrivastava,RaimundasMatulevičius,Abasi-AmefonOAffia,MarylineLaurent, Nazatul Haque Sultan, and Qiang Tang. Post-quantum era privacy protection for intelligent infrastructures.IEEE Access, 9:36038–36077, 2021

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Digital privacy in healthcare: State-of-the-art and future vision.IEEE Access, 2024

    Shalaka S Mahadik, Pranav M Pawar, Raja Muthalagu, Neeli Rashmi Prasad, Sin-Kuen Hawkins, Dimitris Stripelis, Sreedhar Rao, Peter Ejim, and Bruce Hecht. Digital privacy in healthcare: State-of-the-art and future vision.IEEE Access, 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Survey on security and privacy issues in iot healthcare

    Basavaraj Madhu. Survey on security and privacy issues in iot healthcare. InMining Biomedical Text, Images and Visual Features for Information Retrieval, pages 45–66. Elsevier, 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Areviewofsecurityand privacy concerns in the internet of things (iot).Journal of Sensors, 2022(1):5724168, 2022

    MuhammadAqeel,FahadAli,MuhammadWaseemIqbal,ToqirARana,MuhammadArif,andMdRabiulAuwul. Areviewofsecurityand privacy concerns in the internet of things (iot).Journal of Sensors, 2022(1):5724168, 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Accessed: [Date of access]

    Ieeedigitalprivacy&securitycommittee.https://digitalprivacy.ieee.org/about/digital-privacy-model-give. Accessed: [Date of access]

    work page

  42. [42]

    Bridging the technologist-policymaker divide in digital privacy, 2024

    IEEE. Bridging the technologist-policymaker divide in digital privacy, 2024

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Digital identity infrastructures: a critical approach of self-sovereign identity.Digital Society, 2(2):18, 2023

    Alexandra Giannopoulou. Digital identity infrastructures: a critical approach of self-sovereign identity.Digital Society, 2(2):18, 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Linking sensitive data.Methods and techniques for practical privacy-preserving information sharing

    Peter Christen, Thilina Ranbaduge, and Rainer Schnell. Linking sensitive data.Methods and techniques for practical privacy-preserving information sharing. Cham: Springer, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Modern authentication schemes in smartphones and iot devices: An empirical survey.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(10):7639– 7663, 2021

    Milad Taleby Ahvanooey, Mark Xuefang Zhu, Qianmu Li, Wojciech Mazurczyk, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, Birij B Gupta, and Mauro Conti. Modern authentication schemes in smartphones and iot devices: An empirical survey.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(10):7639– 7663, 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    internet of things

    Muhammad Shafiq, Zhaoquan Gu, Omar Cheikhrouhou, Wajdi Alhakami, and Habib Hamam. The rise of “internet of things”: Review and open research issues related to detection and prevention of iot-based security attacks.Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):8669348, 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Privacy-preserving identifiers for iot: a systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 8:168470–168485, 2020

    Mahdi Akil, Lejla Islami, Simone Fischer-Hübner, Leonardo A Martucci, and Albin Zuccato. Privacy-preserving identifiers for iot: a systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 8:168470–168485, 2020

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Attack risk analysis in data anonymization in internet of things.IEEE transactions on computational social systems, 2023

    Tianli Yang, Li Shan Cang, Muddesar Iqbal, and Dhafer Almakhles. Attack risk analysis in data anonymization in internet of things.IEEE transactions on computational social systems, 2023. Shini Girija et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 23 of 27 IoT Digital Privacy

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    A survey on privacy and security of internet of things.Computer Science Review, 38:100312, 2020

    Mark Mbock Ogonji, George Okeyo, and Joseph Muliaro Wafula. A survey on privacy and security of internet of things.Computer Science Review, 38:100312, 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Asystematic review of technologies andsolutions to improve security and privacy protection of citizens in the smart city.Internet of Things, 20:100584, 2022

    Mohammad Hosein PanahiRizi and Seyed AminHosseini Seno. Asystematic review of technologies andsolutions to improve security and privacy protection of citizens in the smart city.Internet of Things, 20:100584, 2022

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Smart home personal assistants: a security and privacy review.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(6):1–36, 2020

    Jide S Edu, Jose M Such, and Guillermo Suarez-Tangil. Smart home personal assistants: a security and privacy review.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(6):1–36, 2020

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    The challenges of iot addressing security, ethics, privacy, and laws.Internet of Things, 15:100420, 2021

    Ashwin Karale. The challenges of iot addressing security, ethics, privacy, and laws.Internet of Things, 15:100420, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Computation and communication efficient approach for federated learning based urban sensing applications against inference attacks.Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 98:101875, 2024

    Ayshika Kapoor and Dheeraj Kumar. Computation and communication efficient approach for federated learning based urban sensing applications against inference attacks.Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 98:101875, 2024

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Whenfederatedlearningmeetsprivacy-preservingcomputation

    JingxueChen,HangYan,ZhiyuanLiu,MinZhang,HuXiong,andShuiYu. Whenfederatedlearningmeetsprivacy-preservingcomputation. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(12):1–36, 2024

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    ParveenSingla,HitendraGarg,AdityaPathak,SimarPreetSingh,etal.Privacyenhancementininternetofthings(iot)viamrmrforprevention and avoidance of data leakage.Computers and Electrical Engineering, 116:109151, 2024

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    CalvinLeeandGouherAhmed.Improvingiotprivacy,dataprotectionandsecurityconcerns.InternationalJournalofTechnology,Innovation and Management (IJTIM), 1(1):18–33, 2021

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Aframeworkforprivacy-preservationofiothealthcare data using federated learning and blockchain technology.Future Generation Computer Systems, 129:380–388, 2022

    SaurabhSingh,ShailendraRathore,OsamaAlfarraj,AmrTolba,andByungunYoon. Aframeworkforprivacy-preservationofiothealthcare data using federated learning and blockchain technology.Future Generation Computer Systems, 129:380–388, 2022

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Defendingdatapoisoningattackviatrustedplatformmoduleand blockchain oracle

    MingyuanHuang,ShengCao,XiongLi,KeHuang,andXiaosongZhang. Defendingdatapoisoningattackviatrustedplatformmoduleand blockchain oracle. InICC 2022-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 1245–1250. IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Securityandprivacyforlowpoweriotdeviceson5gandbeyondnetworks:Challenges and future directions.IEEE Access, 11:39295–39317, 2023

    JonathanCook,SabihUrRehman,andMArifKhan. Securityandprivacyforlowpoweriotdeviceson5gandbeyondnetworks:Challenges and future directions.IEEE Access, 11:39295–39317, 2023

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    The internet-of-things: A surveillance wonderland.Rethinking Cybercrime: Critical Debates, pages 191–211, 2021

    Tine Munk. The internet-of-things: A surveillance wonderland.Rethinking Cybercrime: Critical Debates, pages 191–211, 2021

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Privacy laws and privacy by design schemes for the internet of things: A developer’s perspective.ACM Computing Surveys (Csur), 54(5):1–38, 2021

    Atheer Aljeraisy, Masoud Barati, Omer Rana, and Charith Perera. Privacy laws and privacy by design schemes for the internet of things: A developer’s perspective.ACM Computing Surveys (Csur), 54(5):1–38, 2021

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    An overview of the personal data protection act 2010 (pdpa): Problems and solutions.Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 12(4):559–566, 2020

    Fadhilah Abdul Ghani, Syahirah Mohd Shabri, Maizatul Akmar Mohd Rasli, Nurulhuda Ahmad Razali, and Emir Hambali Ahmad Shuffri. An overview of the personal data protection act 2010 (pdpa): Problems and solutions.Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 12(4):559–566, 2020

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Security and privacy issues of physical objects in the iot: Challenges and opportunities.Digital Communications and Networks, 7(3):373–384, 2021

    Xuanxia Yao, Fadi Farha, Rongyang Li, Ismini Psychoula, Liming Chen, and Huansheng Ning. Security and privacy issues of physical objects in the iot: Challenges and opportunities.Digital Communications and Networks, 7(3):373–384, 2021

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Iot-basedactivitiesofdailylivingforabnormalbehaviordetection: privacy issues and potential countermeasures.IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 4(3):90–95, 2021

    MustafaAMustafa,AlexandrosKonios,andMatiasGarcia-Constantino. Iot-basedactivitiesofdailylivingforabnormalbehaviordetection: privacy issues and potential countermeasures.IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 4(3):90–95, 2021

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1):591–624, 2022

    Sijing Duan, Dan Wang, Ju Ren, Feng Lyu, Ye Zhang, Huaqing Wu, and Xuemin Shen. Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1):591–624, 2022

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Secure healthcare data aggregation and transmission in iot—a survey.IEEE Access, 9:16849–16865, 2021

    Ata Ullah, Muhammad Azeem, Humaira Ashraf, Abdulellah A Alaboudi, Mamoona Humayun, and Nadeem Z Jhanjhi. Secure healthcare data aggregation and transmission in iot—a survey.IEEE Access, 9:16849–16865, 2021

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Navigating compliance for the industrial iot landscape: Frameworks, security, standards, and key ethical considerations

    Ashima Shahi, Shaloo Bansal, Sunil Kumar Chawla, and Ahmed A Elngar. Navigating compliance for the industrial iot landscape: Frameworks, security, standards, and key ethical considerations. InIndustrial Internet of Things Security, pages 81–99. CRC Press, 2024

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Towards data privacy in a fog of things.Internet Technology Letters, page e512, 2024

    George Pacheco Pinto and Cassio Prazeres. Towards data privacy in a fog of things.Internet Technology Letters, page e512, 2024

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Asmartcontract-baseddynamicconsentmanagementsystem for personal data usage under gdpr.Sensors, 21(23):7994, 2021

    MpyanaMwambaMerlec,YounKyuLee,Seng-PhilHong,andHohPeterIn. Asmartcontract-baseddynamicconsentmanagementsystem for personal data usage under gdpr.Sensors, 21(23):7994, 2021

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Searchable encryption scheme for personalized privacy in iot-based big data.Sensors, 19(5):1059, 2019

    Shuai Li, Miao Li, Haitao Xu, and Xianwei Zhou. Searchable encryption scheme for personalized privacy in iot-based big data.Sensors, 19(5):1059, 2019

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Controlledalternatequantumwalks based privacy preserving healthcare images in internet of things.Optics & Laser Technology, 124:105942, 2020

    AhmedAAbdEL-Latif,BassemAbd-El-Atty,EmanMAbou-Nassar,andSalvadorEVenegas-Andraca. Controlledalternatequantumwalks based privacy preserving healthcare images in internet of things.Optics & Laser Technology, 124:105942, 2020

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    A blockchain- based shamir’s threshold cryptography scheme for data protection in industrial internet of things settings.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(11):8154–8167, 2021

    Keping Yu, Liang Tan, Caixia Yang, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, Ali Kashif Bashir, Joel JPC Rodrigues, and Takuro Sato. A blockchain- based shamir’s threshold cryptography scheme for data protection in industrial internet of things settings.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(11):8154–8167, 2021

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Blockchain and homomorphic encryption-based privacy- preserving data aggregation model in smart grid.Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93:107209, 2021

    Parminder Singh, Mehedi Masud, M Shamim Hossain, and Avinash Kaur. Blockchain and homomorphic encryption-based privacy- preserving data aggregation model in smart grid.Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93:107209, 2021

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    End-to-end encryption in resource-constrained iot device.IEEE Access, 11:70040–70051, 2023

    Ala Saleh D Alluhaidan and P Prabu. End-to-end encryption in resource-constrained iot device.IEEE Access, 11:70040–70051, 2023

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    End-to-same-endencryption:Modularlyaugmentinganappwithanefficient,portable, and blind cloud storage.ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, 28(2):1–35, 2025

    LongChen,Ya-NanLi,QiangTang,andMotiYung. End-to-same-endencryption:Modularlyaugmentinganappwithanefficient,portable, and blind cloud storage.ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, 28(2):1–35, 2025

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Blockchain in healthcare and iot: A systematic literature review.Array, 14:100139, 2022

    Endale Mitiku Adere. Blockchain in healthcare and iot: A systematic literature review.Array, 14:100139, 2022

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Fuzzy elliptic curve cryptography for authentication in internet of things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(12):9987–9998, 2021

    Abderrazak Abdaoui, Aiman Erbad, Abdulla Khalid Al-Ali, Amr Mohamed, and Mohsen Guizani. Fuzzy elliptic curve cryptography for authentication in internet of things.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(12):9987–9998, 2021

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    Yingnan Sun, Frank P-W Lo, and Benny Lo. Lightweight internet of things device authentication, encryption, and key distribution using end-to-end neural cryptosystems.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(16):14978–14987, 2021

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    A differential privacy-based classification system for edge computing in iot.Computer Communications, 182:117–128, 2022

    Wanli Xue, Yiran Shen, Chengwen Luo, Weitao Xu, Wen Hu, and Aruna Seneviratne. A differential privacy-based classification system for edge computing in iot.Computer Communications, 182:117–128, 2022

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Privately publishing internet of things data: Bring personalized sampling into differentially private mechanisms.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(1):80–91, 2021

    Wen Huang, Shijie Zhou, Tianqing Zhu, and Yongjian Liao. Privately publishing internet of things data: Bring personalized sampling into differentially private mechanisms.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(1):80–91, 2021

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.