pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04620 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Unified geometric formalism for dissipation and its fluctuations in finite-time microscopic heat engines

Gentaro Watanabe , Guo-Hua Xu , Yuki Minami This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords finite-time thermodynamicsgeometric formalismdissipation fluctuationsmicroscopic heat engineslinear responsemetric tensorsstochastic thermodynamicsequilibrium correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Metric tensors from equilibrium correlations govern both average dissipation and its fluctuations in finite-time microscopic heat engines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified geometric framework that describes both the average dissipated availability and its fluctuations for microscopic heat engines driven over finite times. In the linear-response regime, these quantities are shown to be controlled by metric tensors built from equilibrium correlation functions, creating a shared geometric structure across different stochastic systems. This structure produces explicit bounds on the mean and variance of dissipation, which translate into limits on engine efficiency and efficiency fluctuations. The approach covers Markov jump processes as well as overdamped and underdamped Brownian motion, giving a consistent geometric language for performance analysis in small-scale engines where fluctuations are large.

Core claim

In the linear-response regime the mean dissipated availability and its fluctuations are both governed by metric tensors constructed from equilibrium correlation functions. These tensors supply a common geometric structure that yields bounds on the mean and variance of the dissipated availability and thereby on the efficiency and its fluctuations. The same construction applies without modification to Markov jump processes and to overdamped and underdamped Brownian dynamics.

What carries the argument

Metric tensors constructed from equilibrium correlation functions, which encode the geometric structure that unifies the description of average dissipation and its fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

That metric tensors built solely from equilibrium correlation functions fully capture the mean and fluctuations of dissipated availability for any finite-time driving protocol in the listed stochastic systems.

What would settle it

Simulate or measure the dissipated work in an overdamped Brownian particle driven by a linear protocol between two positions, then check whether the observed mean and variance match the integrals of the equilibrium position autocorrelation function weighted by the protocol speed and the proposed metric tensor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04620 by Gentaro Watanabe, Guo-Hua Xu, Yuki Minami.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Prefactor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Path and protocols for the Brownian Carnot cycle. (a) The path on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Efficiency and its fluctuation of the Brownian Carnot cycle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Microscopic heat engines operate in regimes where thermodynamic quantities fluctuate strongly, making stochastic effects an essential aspect of their performance. However, existing geometric formulations of finite-time thermodynamics primarily characterize average dissipation and do not systematically capture its fluctuations. Here, we develop a unified geometric framework that consistently describes both the mean dissipated availability and its fluctuations. In the linear-response regime, we show that these quantities are governed by metric tensors constructed from equilibrium correlation functions, providing a common geometric structure for dissipation and its fluctuations. This framework yields geometric bounds on both the mean and variance of the dissipated availability, and thereby on the efficiency and its fluctuations. The formalism applies broadly to stochastic systems, including Markov jump processes and overdamped and underdamped Brownian dynamics, establishing a unified geometric description across microscopic heat engines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified geometric framework for finite-time microscopic heat engines that treats both the mean dissipated availability and its fluctuations on equal footing. In the linear-response regime the authors construct metric tensors directly from equilibrium two-time correlation functions; these tensors control the average dissipation via a quadratic form on the protocol and bound the variance through a Cauchy-Schwarz inequality on the same space. The construction is carried out for Markov jump processes as well as overdamped and underdamped Langevin dynamics, yielding geometric bounds on efficiency and efficiency fluctuations that hold uniformly across these classes of stochastic dynamics.

Significance. If the central derivations are correct, the work supplies a non-trivial unification of geometric finite-time thermodynamics with fluctuation theory. By showing that the same equilibrium-derived metric governs both the mean and the variance, the paper offers a compact way to obtain bounds on performance and its variability without additional fitting parameters. The explicit extension to underdamped dynamics and the use of the stochastic-action expansion to second order are technically attractive features that could influence subsequent studies of microscopic engines.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section on stochastic action expansion] The central claim that the same metric tensor bounds both the mean and the variance rests on the identification of the second-order action with equilibrium correlators. The manuscript should supply an explicit intermediate step (e.g., after the expansion of the action) showing how the cross terms vanish or are absorbed for the underdamped case, because the phase-space structure introduces additional correlators that are not obviously symmetric.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework 'yields geometric bounds' but does not indicate whether the bounds are saturated for any nontrivial protocol; a brief remark on saturation would help readers assess the tightness of the results.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for the metric tensors (e.g., G versus g) is introduced in different sections without a consolidated table; a short notation summary would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment identifies a point where an explicit intermediate derivation would improve clarity for the underdamped case. We address it below and will incorporate the requested step in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on stochastic action expansion] The central claim that the same metric tensor bounds both the mean and the variance rests on the identification of the second-order action with equilibrium correlators. The manuscript should supply an explicit intermediate step (e.g., after the expansion of the action) showing how the cross terms vanish or are absorbed for the underdamped case, because the phase-space structure introduces additional correlators that are not obviously symmetric.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit intermediate step will strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add, immediately after the second-order expansion of the stochastic action for underdamped Langevin dynamics, a short calculation showing that the additional phase-space cross terms are absorbed into the symmetric part of the metric. These terms arise from the equilibrium two-time correlators of position and momentum; the fluctuation-dissipation theorem together with the time-reversal symmetry of the equilibrium measure ensures that the resulting bilinear form remains symmetric and positive semi-definite. Consequently the same metric tensor that appears in the quadratic expression for the mean dissipated availability also enters the Cauchy-Schwarz bound on its variance, without requiring additional assumptions. We will include the relevant intermediate expressions and a brief remark on the symmetry. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs its unified geometric framework by expanding the stochastic action to second order in the driving amplitude within the linear-response regime, then directly identifying the resulting quadratic forms with equilibrium two-time correlation functions to define the metric tensors. These tensors are used to bound both the mean dissipated availability and its fluctuations via Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities on protocol space. The fluctuation-dissipation relation appears only in its standard domain of validity, and the extension to underdamped dynamics retains the appropriate phase-space correlators. No step reduces by definition to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the central claims follow from the expansion and standard inequalities without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the linear-response regime and the construction of metric tensors from equilibrium correlation functions; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system operates in the linear-response regime
    Explicitly stated as the regime where the metric-tensor description holds.
  • domain assumption Equilibrium correlation functions define the relevant metric tensors
    Central to the geometric structure claimed for both mean and fluctuations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1159 out tokens · 54547 ms · 2026-05-10T20:20:29.628328+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bustamante, J

    C. Bustamante, J. Liphardt, and F. Ritort, The Nonequilib- rium Thermodynamics of Small Systems, Phys. Today58, 43 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Ciliberto, Experiments in Stochastic Thermodynamics: Short History and Perspectives, Phys

    S. Ciliberto, Experiments in Stochastic Thermodynamics: Short History and Perspectives, Phys. Rev. X7, 021051 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Blickle and C

    V . Blickle and C. Bechinger, Realization of a micrometre- sized stochastic heat engine, Nat. Phys.8, 143 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    P. A. Quinto-Su, A microscopic steam engine implemented in an optical tweezer, Nat. Commun.5, 5889 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    I. A. Mart ´ınez, ´E. Rold ´an, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, J. M. R. Par- rondo, and R. A. Rica, Brownian Carnot engine, Nat. Phys. 12, 67 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Roßnagel, S

    J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, A single-atom heat engine, Science352, 325 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    I. A. Mart ´ınez, ´E. Rold´an, L. Dinis, and R. A. Rica, Colloidal heat engines: a review, Soft Matter,13, 22 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Argun, J

    A. Argun, J. Soni, L. Dabelow, S. Bo, G. Pesce, R. Eichhorn, and G. V olpe, Experimental realization of a minimal micro- scopic heat engine, Phys. Rev. E96, 052106 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Maslennikov, S

    G. Maslennikov, S. Ding, R. Habl ¨utzel, J. Gan, A. Roulet, S. Nimmrichter, J. Dai, V . Scarani, and D. Matsukevich, Quan- tum absorption refrigerator with trapped ions, Nat. Commun. 10, 202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    von Lindenfels, O

    D. von Lindenfels, O. Gr ¨ab, C. T. Schmiegelow, V . Kaushal, J. Schulz, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Spin Heat Engine Coupled to a Harmonic- Oscillator Flywheel, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 080602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    W. Hou, W. Yao, X. Zhao, K. Rehan, Y . Li, Y . Li, E. Lutz, Y . Lin, J. Du, Combining energy efficiency and quantum advan- tage in cyclic machines, Nat. Commun.16, 5127 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    P. G. Steeneken, K. Le Phan, M. J. Goossens, G. E. J. Koops, G. J. A. M. Brom, C. van der Avoort, and J. T. M. van Beek, Piezoresistive heat engine and refrigerator, Nat. Phys.7, 354 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    J. P. Pekola, Towards quantum thermodynamics in electronic circuits, Nat. Phys.11, 118 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Hugel, N

    T. Hugel, N. B. Holland, A. Cattani, L. Moroder, M. Seitz, H. E. Gaub, Single-Molecule Optomechanical Cycle, Science 296, 1103 (2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Klaers, S

    J. Klaers, S. Faelt, A. Imamoglu, and E. Togan, Squeezed Thermal Reservoirs as a Resource for a Nanomechanical En- gine beyond the Carnot Limit, Phys. Rev. X7, 031044 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Rep

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 126001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Sekimoto, Langevin Equation and Thermodynamics, Prog

    K. Sekimoto, Langevin Equation and Thermodynamics, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.130, 17 (1998)

    work page 1998

  18. [18]

    Sekimoto,Stochastic energetics, Lecture Notes in Physics V ol

    K. Sekimoto,Stochastic energetics, Lecture Notes in Physics V ol. 799 (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Saito,Thermodynamics of fluctuating systems— Development of non-equilibrium statistical mechanics (in Japanese), SGC Library V ol

    K. Saito,Thermodynamics of fluctuating systems— Development of non-equilibrium statistical mechanics (in Japanese), SGC Library V ol. 182, (Saiensu-Sha, Tokyo, 2022). 18

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Shiraishi,An Introduction to Stochastic Thermodynamics— From Basic to Advanced, (Springer, Singapore, 2023)

    N. Shiraishi,An Introduction to Stochastic Thermodynamics— From Basic to Advanced, (Springer, Singapore, 2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Peliti and S

    L. Peliti and S. Pigolotti,Stochastic Thermodynamics: An In- troduction, (Princeton Univ. Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Seifert,Stochastic Thermodynamics, (Cambridge Univ

    U. Seifert,Stochastic Thermodynamics, (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Jarzynski, Equalities and Inequalities: Irreversibility and the Second Law of Thermodynamics at the Nanoscale, Ann

    C. Jarzynski, Equalities and Inequalities: Irreversibility and the Second Law of Thermodynamics at the Nanoscale, Ann. Rev. Cond. Mat. Phys.2, 329 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Van den Broeck and M

    C. Van den Broeck and M. Esposito, Ensemble and trajec- tory thermodynamics: A brief introduction, Physica A418, 6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Nicolis and Y

    G. Nicolis and Y . De Decker, Stochastic Thermodynamics of Brownian Motion, Entropy19, 434 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Gu ´ery-Odelin, C

    D. Gu ´ery-Odelin, C. Jarzynski, C. A. Plata, A. Prados, and E. Trizac, Driving rapidly while remaining in control: classical shortcuts from Hamiltonian to stochastic dynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys.86, 035902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Krishnamurthy, S

    S. Krishnamurthy, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterji, R. Ganapathy, and A. K. Sood, A micrometre-sized heat engine operating be- tween bacterial reservoirs, Nat. Phys.12, 1134 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Pietzonka, ´E

    P. Pietzonka, ´E. Fodor, C. Lohrmann, M. E. Cates, and U. Seifert, Autonomous Engines Driven by Active Matter: Ener- getics and Design Principles, Phys. Rev. X9, 041032 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Fodor and M

    ´E. Fodor and M. E. Cates, Active engines: Thermodynamics moves forward, Europhys. Lett.134, 10003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Toyabe and M

    S. Toyabe and M. Sato, Nonequilibrium Fluctuations in Bio- logical Strands, Machines, and Cells, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.84, 102001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Dif- ferences, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Dif- ferences, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2690 (1997)

    work page 1997

  32. [32]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721 (1999)

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation for Biomolecular Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 158101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    T. R. Gingrich, J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. Eng- land, Dissipation Bounds All Steady-State Current Fluctua- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Seifert, From Stochastic Thermodynamics to Thermody- namic Inference, Annu

    U. Seifert, From Stochastic Thermodynamics to Thermody- namic Inference, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 171 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Hasegawa and T

    Y . Hasegawa and T. Van Vu, Fluctuation Theorem Uncertainty Relation, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 110602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Thermodynamic uncer- tainty relations constrain non-equilibrium fluctuations, Nat. Phys.16, 15 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    K. Liu, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation for Arbitrary Initial States, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 140602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Koyuk and U

    T. Koyuk and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic Uncertainty Re- lation for Time-Dependent Driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 260604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Van Vu and Y

    T. Van Vu and Y . Hasegawa, Thermodynamic uncertainty re- lations under arbitrary control protocols, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013060 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    A. C. Barato, R. Chetrite, A. Faggionato, and D. Gabrielli, Bounds on current fluctuations in periodically driven systems, New J. Phys.20, 103023 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Koyuk, U

    T. Koyuk, U. Seifert, and P. Pietzonka, A generalization of the thermodynamic uncertainty relation to periodically driven systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 02LT02 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Koyuk and U

    T. Koyuk and U. Seifert, Operationally Accessible Bounds on Fluctuations and Entropy Production in Periodically Driven Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 230601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    H. J. D. Miller, M. H. Mohammady, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and G. Guarnieri, Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation in Slowly Driven Quantum Heat Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 210603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Wang and J

    Z. Wang and J. Ren, Thermodynamic Geometry of Nonequi- librium Fluctuations in Cyclically Driven Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 207101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Sekimoto, F

    K. Sekimoto, F. Takagi, and T. Hondou, Carnot’s cycle for small systems: Irreversibility and cost of operations, Phys. Rev. E62, 7759 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    Van den Broeck, Thermodynamic Efficiency at Maximum Power, Phys

    C. Van den Broeck, Thermodynamic Efficiency at Maximum Power, Phys. Rev. Lett95, 190602 (2005)

    work page 2005

  48. [48]

    Schmiedl and U

    T. Schmiedl and U. Seifert, Efficiency at maximum power: An analytically solvable model for stochastic heat engines, Euro- phys. Lett.81, 200003 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Esposito, R

    M. Esposito, R. Kawai, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Efficiency at Maximum Power of Low-Dissipation Carnot Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 150603 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Dechant, N

    A. Dechant, N. Kiesel, and E. Lutz, All-Optical Nanomechan- ical Heat Engine, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 183602 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Brandner, K

    K. Brandner, K. Saito, and U. Seifert, Thermodynamics of Micro- and Nano-Systems Driven by Periodic Temperature Variations, Phys. Rev. X5, 031019 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Dechant, N

    A. Dechant, N. Kiesel and E. Lutz, Underdamped stochas- tic heat engine at maximum efficiency, Europhys. Lett.119, 50003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Strasberg, C

    P. Strasberg, C. W. W ¨achtler, and G. Schaller, Autonomous Implementation of Thermodynamic Cycles at the Nanoscale, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 180605 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Hoppenau, M

    J. Hoppenau, M. Niemann, and A. Engel, Carnot process with a single particle, Phys. Rev. E87, 062127 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Holubec, An exactly solvable model of a stochastic heat en- gine: optimization of power, power fluctuations and efficiency, J

    V . Holubec, An exactly solvable model of a stochastic heat en- gine: optimization of power, power fluctuations and efficiency, J. Stat. Mech.2014, P05022 (2014)

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    S. Rana, P. S. Pal, A. Saha, and A. M. Jayannavar, Single- particle stochastic heat engine, Phys. Rev. E90, 042146 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Cerino, A

    L. Cerino, A. Puglisi, and A. Vulpiani, Kinetic model for the finite-time thermodynamics of small heat engines, Phys. Rev. E91, 032128 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Holubec and A

    V . Holubec and A. Ryabov, Work and power fluctuations in a critical heat engine, Phys. Rev. E96, 030102(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Holubec and A

    V . Holubec and A. Ryabov, Cycling Tames Power Fluctua- tions near Optimum Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 120601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Dechant, Multidimensional thermodynamic uncertainty re- lations, J

    A. Dechant, Multidimensional thermodynamic uncertainty re- lations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 035001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Ito, G.-H

    K. Ito, G.-H. Xu, C. Jiang, ´E. Rold ´an, R. A. Rica-Alarc ´on, I. A. Mart ´ınez, and G. Watanabe, Universal relations and bounds for fluctuations in quasistatic small heat engines, Com- mun. Phys.8, 60 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Saryal, M

    S. Saryal, M. Gerry, I. Khait, D. Segal, and B. K. Agarwalla, Universal Bounds on Fluctuations in Continuous Thermal Ma- chines, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 190603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Mohanta, S

    S. Mohanta, S. Saryal, and B. K. Agarwalla, Universal bounds on cooling power and cooling efficiency for au- tonomous absorption refrigerators, arXiv:2106.12809 [cond- mat.stat-mech] (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Holubec and A

    V . Holubec and A. Ryabov, Fluctuations in heat engines, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 013001 (2021). 19

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Verley, M

    G. Verley, M. Esposito, T. Willaert, and C. Van den Broeck, The unlikely Carnot efficiency, Nat. Commun.5, 4721 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Verley, T

    G. Verley, T. Willaert, C. Van den Broeck, and M. Esposito, Universal theory of efficiency fluctuations, Phys. Rev. E90, 052145 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    Proesmans and C

    K. Proesmans and C. Van den Broeck, Stochastic efficiency: five case studies, New. J. Phys.17, 065004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Proesmans, C

    K. Proesmans, C. Driesen, B. Cleuren, and C. Van den Broeck, Efficiency of single-particle engines, Phys. Rev. E92, 032105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Park, H.-M

    J.-M. Park, H.-M. Chun, and J. D. Noh, Efficiency at maxi- mum power and efficiency fluctuations in a linear Brownian heat-engine model, Phys. Rev. E94, 012127 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    A. Saha, R. Marathe, P. S. Pal, and A. M. Jayannavar, Stochas- tic heat engine powered by active dissipation, J. Stat. Mech. 2018, 113203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    S. K. Manikandan, L. Dabelow, R. Eichhorn, and S. Krish- namurthy, Efficiency Fluctuations in Microscopic Machines, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    Vroylandt, M

    H. Vroylandt, M. Esposito, and G. Verley, Efficiency Fluctua- tions of Stochastic Machines Undergoing a Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 250603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    N. A. Sinitsyn, Fluctuation relation for heat engines, J. Phys. A44, 405001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    P. S. Pal, S. Lahiri, and A. M. Jayannavar, Transient exchange fluctuation theorems for heat using a Hamiltonian framework: Classical and quantum regimes, Phys. Rev. E95, 042124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Proesmans and C

    K. Proesmans and C. Van den Broeck, Discrete-time ther- modynamic uncertainty relation, Europhys. Lett.119, 20001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    Pietzonka and U

    P. Pietzonka and U. Seifert, Universal Trade-Off between Power, Efficiency, and Constancy in Steady-State Heat En- gines, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 190602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    A. M. Timpanaro, G. Guarnieri, J. Goold, and G. T. Landi, Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relations from Exchange Fluc- tuation Theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 090604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Kamijima, S

    T. Kamijima, S. Otsubo, Y . Ashida, and T. Sagawa, Higher- order efficiency bound and its application to nonlinear nanoth- ermoelectrics, Phys. Rev. E104, 044115 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Xu and G

    G.-H. Xu and G. Watanabe, Correlation-enhanced stability of microscopic cyclic heat engines, Phys. Rev. Research4, L032017 (2022)

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    G.-H. Xu, C. Jiang, Y . Minami, and G. Watanabe, Relation be- tween fluctuations and efficiency at maximum power for small heat engines, Phys. Rev. Research4, 043139 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.