pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04658 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.CV

Synthesis4AD: Synthetic Anomalies are All You Need for 3D Anomaly Detection

Yihan Sun , Yuqi Cheng , Junjie Zu , Yuxiang Tan , Guoyang Xie , Yucheng Wang , Yunkang Cao , Weiming Shen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords 3D anomaly detectionsynthetic datapoint cloudsindustrial inspectionanomaly synthesismultimodal language modelPoint Transformer
0
0 comments X

The pith

Synthetic anomalies generated from product designs suffice to train state-of-the-art 3D anomaly detectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that scarcity of real abnormal samples limits performance in industrial 3D anomaly detection. It introduces Synthesis4AD, an end-to-end system that creates large volumes of high-fidelity synthetic defects for point clouds using a controllable engine. This engine receives instructions translated from product design data by a multimodal language model and produces both the defects and their exact point-wise labels. A training pipeline adds spatial normalization and geometry-preserving augmentations to help models handle unstructured real-world scans. Experiments report better results than prior methods on three different test collections.

Core claim

Synthesis4AD relies on 3D-DefectStudio and its MPAS synthesis engine to inject geometrically realistic defects into 3D point clouds using higher-dimensional support primitives while automatically producing accurate anomaly masks, with a multimodal large language model converting product design information into synthesis instructions, followed by a training stage that applies spatial-distribution normalization and geometry-faithful augmentations to improve Point Transformer robustness on unstructured data.

What carries the argument

MPAS controllable synthesis engine that injects defects guided by higher-dimensional support primitives to produce point-wise anomaly masks in 3D point clouds.

If this is right

  • Anomaly detectors can be trained without collecting or labeling rare real defect samples.
  • The same synthesis pipeline applies across different industrial parts without manual annotation effort.
  • Point Transformer models become less sensitive to absolute coordinate shifts in real scans.
  • Scalable generation supports training on far more defect variations than available in real data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same synthesis approach could shorten development time for inspection systems on new product lines by reusing design information.
  • Public release of the synthesis tools may let other researchers create consistent benchmark datasets for comparing anomaly methods.
  • The method might reduce reliance on expensive real-world data collection in related tasks such as surface defect inspection or assembly verification.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic anomalies produced by the MPAS engine match the geometry and distribution of real defects closely enough for models trained only on them to generalize to actual industrial test data.

What would settle it

A direct comparison where a detector trained exclusively on the synthetic anomalies is evaluated on a fresh collection of real industrial defects and shows detection accuracy no higher than a detector trained on a modest set of actual anomalies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04658 by Guoyang Xie, Junjie Zu, Weiming Shen, Yihan Sun, Yucheng Wang, Yunkang Cao, Yuqi Cheng, Yuxiang Tan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison between previous methods and our method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MPAS framework leverages different dimensional primitives to automatically synthesize massive, realistic, and diverse 3D anomalous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the proposed Synthesis4AD system. Stage I parses product-side knowledge, including expert priors, multi-view cues, and textual specifications, into executable synthesis instructions via an MLLM, and drives 3D-DefectStudio to inject controllable anomalies into large-scale normal 3D assets. Stage II trains the anomaly detector using the generated anomalous samples and their ground-truth masks. St… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of anomalies. From top to bottom: real anomalies, Synthesized anomalies by MPAS with the same types, and two rows of more diverse compound anomalies synthesized by MPAS. Red insets highlight defect regions for detailed comparison. Airplane Light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: t-SNE visualization of feature distributions. Normal samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison of on representative categories. From top to bottom: input point clouds ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Feature distribution visualization of MC3D-AD, GLFM, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Real-world industrial data collection and representative defect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visualization of prediction results in the actual industry parts dataset using the proposed method and other methods. The first column is the original point clouds, while the second column is the ground truth. Subsequent columns depict various methods. D. Evaluation in Practical Industrial Parts To evaluate the practicality of our system in real inspection scenarios, we build a real-world dataset by scann… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Industrial 3D anomaly detection performance is fundamentally constrained by the scarcity and long-tailed distribution of abnormal samples. To address this challenge, we propose Synthesis4AD, an end-to-end paradigm that leverages large-scale, high-fidelity synthetic anomalies to learn more discriminative representations for 3D anomaly detection. At the core of Synthesis4AD is 3D-DefectStudio, a software platform built upon the controllable synthesis engine MPAS, which injects geometrically realistic defects guided by higher-dimensional support primitives while simultaneously generating accurate point-wise anomaly masks. Furthermore, Synthesis4AD incorporates a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to interpret product design information and automatically translate it into executable anomaly synthesis instructions, enabling scalable and knowledge-driven anomalous data generation. To improve the robustness and generalization of the downstream detector on unstructured point clouds, Synthesis4AD further introduces a training pipeline based on spatial-distribution normalization and geometry-faithful data augmentations, which alleviates the sensitivity of Point Transformer architectures to absolute coordinates and improves feature learning under realistic data variations. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on Real3D-AD, MulSen-AD, and a real-world industrial parts dataset. The proposed synthesis method MPAS and the interactive system 3D-DefectStudio will be publicly released at https://github.com/hustCYQ/Synthesis4AD.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Synthesis4AD, an end-to-end framework for 3D anomaly detection that generates large-scale synthetic anomalies via the MPAS controllable synthesis engine inside the 3D-DefectStudio platform; MPAS injects geometrically realistic defects using higher-dimensional support primitives and point-wise masks, with MLLM interpreting product design information to produce scalable synthesis instructions. A downstream training pipeline applies spatial-distribution normalization and geometry-faithful augmentations to a Point Transformer to improve robustness on unstructured point clouds. The manuscript reports state-of-the-art results on Real3D-AD, MulSen-AD, and a real-world industrial parts dataset, with public release of MPAS and 3D-DefectStudio planned.

Significance. If the MPAS-generated anomalies are distributionally close enough to real defects to produce the claimed generalization gains, the work would meaningfully address the long-tailed anomaly data problem in industrial 3D anomaly detection. The planned open release of the synthesis engine and interactive studio constitutes a concrete contribution to reproducibility and follow-on research.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments (likely §5) and Method (§3)] The SOTA claims on Real3D-AD, MulSen-AD, and the industrial dataset rest on the premise that MPAS synthetics (primitive-guided injection plus MLLM instructions) are sufficiently representative of real defects; however, no quantitative distributional comparison (Chamfer/EMD distances, curvature histograms, or feature-space alignment metrics) between synthetic and real anomaly point clouds is reported in the experimental section, leaving open whether gains derive from true realism or from data volume and tuning.
  2. [Results section] Table or figure reporting the main results should include explicit baseline methods, exact metrics (AUROC, AUPRO, etc.), and ablations isolating the contribution of MPAS realism versus the spatial normalization/augmentation pipeline; without these, the magnitude and source of the reported improvements cannot be verified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that MPAS and 3D-DefectStudio will be released but does not specify the exact license or repository structure; adding this detail would strengthen the reproducibility claim.
  2. [Method and Experiments] Ensure consistent notation for point-wise anomaly masks and spatial normalization across method and experiments sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which identify key areas to strengthen the validation of our synthetic anomaly approach. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested analyses and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments (likely §5) and Method (§3)] The SOTA claims on Real3D-AD, MulSen-AD, and the industrial dataset rest on the premise that MPAS synthetics (primitive-guided injection plus MLLM instructions) are sufficiently representative of real defects; however, no quantitative distributional comparison (Chamfer/EMD distances, curvature histograms, or feature-space alignment metrics) between synthetic and real anomaly point clouds is reported in the experimental section, leaving open whether gains derive from true realism or from data volume and tuning.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative distributional comparisons would provide stronger evidence for the realism of MPAS synthetics. The current manuscript demonstrates effectiveness through SOTA results on real datasets, but does not include direct metrics such as Chamfer distance, EMD, curvature histograms, or feature-space alignment. In the revised version, we will add a new experimental subsection reporting these comparisons between synthetic and real anomaly point clouds, along with discussion of how they indicate that performance gains stem from distributional similarity rather than data volume alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Table or figure reporting the main results should include explicit baseline methods, exact metrics (AUROC, AUPRO, etc.), and ablations isolating the contribution of MPAS realism versus the spatial normalization/augmentation pipeline; without these, the magnitude and source of the reported improvements cannot be verified.

    Authors: We concur that clearer presentation of baselines, metrics, and ablations is needed for verifiability. The revised manuscript will update the primary results tables and figures to explicitly list all baseline methods with exact metrics (AUROC, AUPRO, and others as used). We will also add ablation studies that isolate the individual contributions of MPAS synthesis, spatial-distribution normalization, and geometry-faithful augmentations, enabling readers to assess the source and magnitude of improvements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in claimed derivation

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical pipeline: MPAS primitive-guided synthesis of anomalies, MLLM instruction translation, spatial normalization + augmentations, and Point Transformer training, followed by direct evaluation on external benchmarks (Real3D-AD, MulSen-AD, industrial dataset). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented that reduce the SOTA claim to a tautology or to quantities fitted on the target test distributions themselves. The central performance result is therefore not forced by construction from the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim depends on the unproven transferability of synthetic defects to real data distributions and the accuracy of MLLM in generating executable synthesis instructions from design text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption High-fidelity synthetic anomalies generated from higher-dimensional support primitives will produce point-wise masks and geometries that improve real-world detector robustness
    Invoked in the description of 3D-DefectStudio and the training pipeline; if false, the SOTA claim collapses.
invented entities (2)
  • MPAS no independent evidence
    purpose: Controllable synthesis engine that injects geometrically realistic defects guided by higher-dimensional support primitives
    New engine introduced as the core of the synthesis method.
  • 3D-DefectStudio no independent evidence
    purpose: Software platform built on MPAS for generating synthetic anomalies and accurate masks
    New interactive system proposed for scalable anomaly data generation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1409 out tokens · 67291 ms · 2026-05-10T19:57:24.323557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Diffusionad: Norm-guided one-step denoising diffusion for anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 2025

    Hui Zhang, Zheng Wang, Dan Zeng, Zuxuan Wu, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Diffusionad: Norm-guided one-step denoising diffusion for anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Global-regularized neighborhood regression for efficient zero-shot texture anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2025

    Haiming Yao, Wei Luo, Yunkang Cao, Yiheng Zhang, Wenyong Yu, and Weiming Shen. Global-regularized neighborhood regression for efficient zero-shot texture anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Personalizing vision-language models with hybrid prompts for zero-shot anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 55(4):1917–1929, 2025

    Yunkang Cao, Xiaohao Xu, Yuqi Cheng, Chen Sun, Zongwei Du, Liang Gao, and Weiming Shen. Personalizing vision-language models with hybrid prompts for zero-shot anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 55(4):1917–1929, 2025

    work page 1917

  4. [4]

    Progressive boundary guided anomaly synthesis for industrial anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024

    Qiyu Chen, Huiyuan Luo, Han Gao, Chengkan Lv, and Zhengtao Zhang. Progressive boundary guided anomaly synthesis for industrial anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Landmark block-embedded aggregation autoencoder for anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    Ye Liu, Yuanrong Tian, Yunlong Mi, Hui Liu, Jianqiang Wang, and Witold Pedrycz. Landmark block-embedded aggregation autoencoder for anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    M3dm-nr: Rgb-3d noisy- resistant industrial anomaly detection via multimodal denoising.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

    Chengjie Wang, Haokun Zhu, Jinlong Peng, Yue Wang, Ran Yi, Yun- sheng Wu, Lizhuang Ma, and Jiangning Zhang. M3dm-nr: Rgb-3d noisy- resistant industrial anomaly detection via multimodal denoising.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Bias: Incorporating biased knowledge to boost unsupervised image anomaly localization.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 54(4):2342–2353, 2024

    Yunkang Cao, Xiaohao Xu, Chen Sun, Liang Gao, and Weiming Shen. Bias: Incorporating biased knowledge to boost unsupervised image anomaly localization.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 54(4):2342–2353, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Integrated inspection on pcb manufacturing in cyber–physical–social systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4):2098–2106, 2023

    Yutong Wang, Jiangong Wang, Yansong Cao, Shixing Li, and Oliver Kwan. Integrated inspection on pcb manufacturing in cyber–physical–social systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4):2098–2106, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2022.3229096. 14

    work page doi:10.1109/tsmc.2022.3229096 2098

  9. [9]

    Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey.Machine Intelligence Research, 21(1):104–135, 2024

    Jiaqi Liu, Guoyang Xie, Jinbao Wang, Shangnian Li, Chengjie Wang, Feng Zheng, and Yaochu Jin. Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey.Machine Intelligence Research, 21(1):104–135, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Self-supervision-augmented deep autoencoder for un- supervised visual anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(12):13834–13847, 2022

    Chao Huang, Zehua Yang, Jie Wen, Yong Xu, Qiuping Jiang, Jian Yang, and Yaowei Wang. Self-supervision-augmented deep autoencoder for un- supervised visual anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(12):13834–13847, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3127716

    work page doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3127716 2022

  11. [11]

    Masked swin transformer unet for industrial anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(2):2200–2209, 2022

    Jielin Jiang, Jiale Zhu, Muhammad Bilal, Yan Cui, Neeraj Kumar, Ruihan Dou, Feng Su, and Xiaolong Xu. Masked swin transformer unet for industrial anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(2):2200–2209, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TII.2022.3199228

    work page doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3199228 2022

  12. [12]

    Collabo- rative discrepancy optimization for reliable image anomaly localization

    Yunkang Cao, Xiaohao Xu, Zhaoge Liu, and Weiming Shen. Collabo- rative discrepancy optimization for reliable image anomaly localization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, pages 1–10, 2023. doi: 10.1109/TII.2023.3241579

    work page doi:10.1109/tii.2023.3241579 2023

  13. [13]

    Towards high-resolution 3d anomaly detection via group-level feature contrastive learning.ACM Multimedia (ACM MM), 2024

    Hongze Zhu, Guoyang Xie, Chengbin Hou, Tao Dai, Can Gao, Jinbao Wang, and Linlin Shen. Towards high-resolution 3d anomaly detection via group-level feature contrastive learning.ACM Multimedia (ACM MM), 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    R3d-ad: Reconstruction via diffusion for 3d anomaly detection

    Zheyuan Zhou, Le Wang, Naiyu Fang, Zili Wang, Lemiao Qiu, and Shuyou Zhang. R3d-ad: Reconstruction via diffusion for 3d anomaly detection. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Yuqi Cheng, Yunkang Cao, Dongfang Wang, Weiming Shen, and Wen- long Li. Boosting global-local feature matching via anomaly synthesis for multi-class point cloud anomaly detection.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22:12560–12571, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Examining the source of defects from a mechanical perspective for 3d anomaly detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05901, 2025

    Hanzhe Liang, Aoran Wang, Jie Zhou, Xin Jin, Can Gao, and Jinbao Wang. Examining the source of defects from a mechanical perspective for 3d anomaly detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05901, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Exploiting point-language models with dual- prompts for 3d anomaly detection.Expert Syst

    Jiaxiang Wang, Haote Xu, Xiaolu Chen, Haodi Xu, Yue Huang, Xinghao Ding, and Xiaotong Tu. Exploiting point-language models with dual- prompts for 3d anomaly detection.Expert Syst. Appl., 298:129758, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Towards high-resolution 3d anomaly detection: A scalable dataset and real-time framework for subtle industrial defects.AAAI, 2026

    Yuqi Cheng, Yihan Sun, Hui Zhang, Weiming Shen, and Yunkang Cao. Towards high-resolution 3d anomaly detection: A scalable dataset and real-time framework for subtle industrial defects.AAAI, 2026

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    Mc3d-ad: A unified geometry-aware reconstruction model for multi-category 3d anomaly detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01969, 2025

    Jiayi Cheng, Can Gao, Jie Zhou, Jiajun Wen, Tao Dai, and Jinbao Wang. Mc3d-ad: A unified geometry-aware reconstruction model for multi-category 3d anomaly detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01969, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Back to the feature: classical 3d features are (almost) all you need for 3d anomaly detection

    Eliahu Horwitz and Yedid Hoshen. Back to the feature: classical 3d features are (almost) all you need for 3d anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2967–2976, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Multimodal industrial anomaly detection via hybrid fusion

    Yue Wang, Jinlong Peng, Jiangning Zhang, Ran Yi, Yabiao Wang, and Chengjie Wang. Multimodal industrial anomaly detection via hybrid fusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8032–8041, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Masked autoencoders for 3d point cloud self-supervised learning.World Scientific Annual Review of Artificial Intelligence, 1:2440001, 2023

    Yatian Pang, Eng Hock Francis Tay, Li Yuan, and Zhenghua Chen. Masked autoencoders for 3d point cloud self-supervised learning.World Scientific Annual Review of Artificial Intelligence, 1:2440001, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Complementary pseudo multimodal feature for point cloud anomaly detection.Pattern Recognition, 156:110761, 2024

    Yunkang Cao, Xiaohao Xu, and Weiming Shen. Complementary pseudo multimodal feature for point cloud anomaly detection.Pattern Recognition, 156:110761, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Towards zero-shot point cloud anomaly detection: A multi- view projection framework.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    Yuqi Cheng, Yunkang Cao, Guoyang Xie, Zhichao Lu, and Weiming Shen. Towards zero-shot point cloud anomaly detection: A multi- view projection framework.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Look inside for more: Internal spatial modality perception for 3d anomaly detection

    Hanzhe Liang, Guoyang Xie, Chengbin Hou, Bingshu Wang, Can Gao, and Jinbao Wang. Look inside for more: Internal spatial modality perception for 3d anomaly detection. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pages 5146–5154, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Pointad: Comprehending 3d anomalies from points and pixels for zero-shot 3d anomaly detection.NeurIPS, 2024

    Qihang Zhou, Jiangtao Yan, Shibo He, Wenchao Meng, and Jiming Chen. Pointad: Comprehending 3d anomalies from points and pixels for zero-shot 3d anomaly detection.NeurIPS, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Real3d-ad: A dataset of point cloud anomaly detection

    Jiaqi Liu, Guoyang Xie, Xinpeng Li, Jinbao Wang, Yong Liu, Chengjie Wang, Feng Zheng, et al. Real3d-ad: A dataset of point cloud anomaly detection. InThirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, volume 36, 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Registration based few-shot anomaly detection

    Chaoqin Huang, Haoyan Guan, Aofan Jiang, Ya Zhang, Michael Spratling, and Yan-Feng Wang. Registration based few-shot anomaly detection. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 303–

    work page

  29. [29]

    IEEE/CVF Conf

    Karsten Roth, Latha Pemula, Joaquin Zepeda, Bernhard Sch ¨olkopf, Thomas Brox, and Peter Gehler. Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14318–14328, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01392

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01392 2022

  30. [30]

    Huijun Gao, Chao Ye, Weiyang Lin, and Jianbin Qiu. Complex workpiece positioning system with nonrigid registration method for 6- dofs automatic spray painting robot.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(12):7305–7313, 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    MVGR: Mean-variance minimization global registration method for multi-view point cloud in robot inspection.IEEE Transac- tions on Instrumentation and Measurement, pages 1–1, 2024

    Yuqi Cheng, Wenlong Li, Cheng Jiang, Dongfang Wang, Hongwen Xing, and Wei Xu. MVGR: Mean-variance minimization global registration method for multi-view point cloud in robot inspection.IEEE Transac- tions on Instrumentation and Measurement, pages 1–1, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Anomaly detection in 3d point clouds using deep geometric descriptors

    Paul Bergmann and David Sattlegger. Anomaly detection in 3d point clouds using deep geometric descriptors. In2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 2612– 2622, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Shape-guided dual-memory learning for 3d anomaly detection

    Yu-Min Chu, Chieh Liu, Ting-I Hsieh, Hwann-Tzong Chen, and Tyng- Luh Liu. Shape-guided dual-memory learning for 3d anomaly detection. InProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, pages 6185–6194, 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Anomagic: Crossmodal prompt-driven zero- shot anomaly generation.AAAI, 2026

    Yuxin Jiang, Wei Luo, Hui Zhang, Qiyu Chen, Haiming Yao, Weiming Shen, and Yunkang Cao. Anomagic: Crossmodal prompt-driven zero- shot anomaly generation.AAAI, 2026

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Dual- interrelated diffusion model for few-shot anomaly image generation

    Ying Jin, Jinlong Peng, Qingdong He, Teng Hu, Jiafu Wu, Hao Chen, Haoxuan Wang, Wenbing Zhu, Mingmin Chi, Jun Liu, et al. Dual- interrelated diffusion model for few-shot anomaly image generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 30420–30429, 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Few-shot anomaly-driven generation for anomaly classification and segmentation

    Guan Gui, Bin-Bin Gao, Jun Liu, Chengjie Wang, and Yunsheng Wu. Few-shot anomaly-driven generation for anomaly classification and segmentation. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 210–

    work page

  37. [37]

    Defectfill: Realistic defect generation with inpainting diffusion model for visual inspection

    Jaewoo Song, Daemin Park, Kanghyun Baek, Sangyub Lee, Jooyoung Choi, Eunji Kim, and Sungroh Yoon. Defectfill: Realistic defect generation with inpainting diffusion model for visual inspection. InPro- ceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 18718–18727, 2025

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Po3ad: Predicting point offsets toward better 3d point cloud anomaly detection

    Jianan Ye, Weiguang Zhao, Xi Yang, Guangliang Cheng, and Kaizhu Huang. Po3ad: Predicting point offsets toward better 3d point cloud anomaly detection. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 1353–1362, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    An interview with edsger w

    Philip L Frana and Thomas J Misa. An interview with edsger w. dijkstra. Communications of the ACM, 53(8):41–47, 2010

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    The quick- hull algorithm for convex hulls.ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 22(4):469–483, 1996

    C Bradford Barber, David P Dobkin, and Hannu Huhdanpaa. The quick- hull algorithm for convex hulls.ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 22(4):469–483, 1996

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    Principal components analysis (pca).Computers & Geosciences, 19(3):303–342, 1993

    Andrzej Ma ´ckiewicz and Waldemar Ratajczak. Principal components analysis (pca).Computers & Geosciences, 19(3):303–342, 1993

    work page 1993

  42. [42]

    Multi- sensor object anomaly detection: Unifying appearance, geometry, and internal properties.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14592, 2024

    Wenqiao Li, Bozhong Zheng, Xiaohao Xu, Jinye Gan, Fading Lu, Xiang Li, Na Ni, Zheng Tian, Xiaonan Huang, Shenghua Gao, et al. Multi- sensor object anomaly detection: Unifying appearance, geometry, and internal properties.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14592, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Fast point feature histograms (fpfh) for 3d registration

    Radu Bogdan Rusu, Nico Blodow, and Michael Beetz. Fast point feature histograms (fpfh) for 3d registration. In2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pages 3212–3217. IEEE, 2009

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Wenqiao Li and Xiaohao Xu. Towards scalable 3d anomaly detection and localization: A benchmark via 3d anomaly synthesis and a self- supervised learning network.2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024

    work page 2024