Granularity Noise Limit in Atomic-Ensemble-Based Metrology

Chen-Rong Liu; Chuang Li; Mingti Zhou; Runxia Tao; Xinqing Wang; Ying Dong; Yixuan Wang

arxiv: 2604.05420 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Granularity Noise Limit in Atomic-Ensemble-Based Metrology

Chen-Rong Liu , Chuang Li , Runxia Tao , Yixuan Wang , Mingti Zhou , Xinqing Wang , Ying Dong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

keywords atomic granularity noiseatomic ensemble metrologyquantum sensingnoise scaling lawphoton-to-atom ratiodiscrete atom statisticsoptical measurement noisesensitivity limit

0 comments

The pith

Atomic discreteness creates an intrinsic granularity noise that competes with optical shot noise in ensemble sensors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard analysis of atomic-ensemble sensors treats the atoms as a smooth continuous medium whose only noise source is optical measurement noise such as photon shot noise. This paper replaces that picture with a discrete-atom statistical model and shows that the actual particle nature of the atoms produces an additional granularity noise. The two noises are linked by one dimensionless ratio R of average probe photons to average atoms, producing a continuous crossover from optical-noise dominance at low R to granularity-noise dominance at high R. The same model reveals that raising probe power, the usual way to suppress optical noise, can instead drive the system into the granularity-limited regime and reduce sensitivity. It further identifies a critical R value past which nonclassical light states cease to improve performance because granularity noise has already taken over.

Core claim

By replacing the continuous-medium approximation with a discrete-atom statistical framework, the authors derive a unified noise-scaling law governed by the single dimensionless ratio R equal to the photon-to-atom flux. This law describes a smooth transition between an optical-measurement-noise-limited regime at small R and an atomic-granularity-noise-limited regime at large R. The framework additionally predicts a critical threshold R_crit beyond which quantum-enhanced metrology with non-classical light fails to improve sensitivity because the measurement is already limited by atomic discreteness.

What carries the argument

The discrete-atom statistical framework that extracts an intrinsic granularity noise term from the particulate statistics of the atomic ensemble and combines it with optical noise through the single ratio R.

If this is right

Increasing optical probe power beyond a certain point degrades rather than improves sensitivity.
Quantum metrology using non-classical light loses its advantage once the photon-to-atom ratio exceeds R_crit.
Optimal design requires balancing photon and atom numbers together instead of maximizing probe light alone.
The same scaling law covers all operating regimes without separate models for each noise source.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The granularity limit may constrain performance in related atomic sensors such as clocks and magnetometers that also rely on ensembles.
Practical calibration could map sensitivity versus probe intensity to locate the crossover point for a given device.
The framework suggests new resource-balancing rules for large atomic arrays in quantum networks or distributed sensing.
Experiments could search for the predicted sensitivity peak at intermediate photon-to-atom ratios.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the discrete, particulate character of the atoms produces a distinct granularity noise whose statistics are fully captured by the new discrete-atom model without other unaccounted effects.

What would settle it

An experiment that holds atom number fixed while increasing probe photon number and checks whether sensor sensitivity reaches a maximum and then declines once the photon-to-atom ratio passes the predicted crossover into the granularity-dominated regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05420 by Chen-Rong Liu, Chuang Li, Mingti Zhou, Runxia Tao, Xinqing Wang, Ying Dong, Yixuan Wang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) plots the relative noise 𝜎S/𝜎 (0) S versus R for several representative Rabi frequencies Ω0/2𝜋 (see legend). Under the weak-probe condition (𝑃 ≪ 𝑃 th 𝑠 , where 𝑃 th 𝑠 is the Doppler-corrected saturation power [21]; marked by red ▼ in the panel), the curves exhibit the predicted continuous crossover (R𝑐 ∼ 10−3 ) from the OMN-limited to the AGNlimited regime. In the OMN-limited regime (R ≪ R𝑐), the nois… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Conventional noise analysis in atomic-ensemble sensing assumes a continuous-medium approximation, thereby treating the atomic system as a deterministic dielectric. Here, we demonstrate that this assumption breaks down due to the discrete, particulate nature of the ensemble, giving rise to an intrinsic "atomic granularity noise" (AGN) that fundamentally competes with the optical measurement noise (OMN, typically photon shot noise). By introducing a discrete-atom statistical framework, we derive a unified noise-scaling law governed by a single dimensionless resource ratio, $\mathcal{R} = \bar{N}_{\mathrm{ph}}/\bar{N}_{\mathrm{at}}$ at (the photon-to-atom flux ratio). This law predicts a continuous crossover from an OMN-limited regime to an AGN-limited regime. Crucially, our results reveal a counter-intuitive constraint for sensor optimization: increasing optical probe power -- standard practice to mitigate OMN -- can paradoxically degrade sensitivity by driving the system into the AGN-dominated regime. Furthermore, we identify a critical resource threshold, $\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{crit}}$, beyond which quantum-enhanced metrology using non-classical light fails to improve sensitivity, as it becomes limited by the AGN.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper flags atomic discreteness as a new noise source that competes with photon shot noise and flips the usual advice on cranking up probe power or using squeezed light.

read the letter

The main point is that standard continuous-medium models for atomic ensembles miss an intrinsic granularity noise (AGN) from the atoms being discrete particles. By switching to a discrete statistical treatment they get a single-parameter scaling law in R = photon flux over atom number that shows a smooth crossover: at low R the usual optical measurement noise dominates, but past some point AGN takes over and extra light makes things worse. They also flag a critical R where nonclassical light stops buying you anything because AGN caps the sensitivity anyway. That optimization warning is the practical takeaway for anyone running atomic clocks or magnetometers. The derivation looks like it comes from treating the atoms as independent scatterers whose number fluctuations add a distinct variance term, which is a reasonable way to capture the breakdown of the continuous approximation. If the math checks out it gives experimenters a concrete knob to turn when balancing laser power against atom number. The soft spot is that the abstract gives the results but not the actual equations or any cross-check against simulation or data, so it's still unclear how cleanly the discrete model separates from ordinary atom-number Poisson noise or whether other effects like Doppler broadening get folded in. Without that, the novelty feels more like a useful reframing than a wholly new mechanism. This is for people who design or optimize atomic-ensemble sensors and already worry about resource allocation between light and atoms. A referee who knows the continuous approximations in the field could check the derivation quickly, and the claim is specific enough to be falsifiable. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces atomic granularity noise (AGN) as an intrinsic limit in atomic-ensemble metrology arising from the breakdown of the continuous-medium approximation due to the discrete nature of atoms. Using a discrete-atom statistical framework, the authors derive a unified noise-scaling law governed by the single dimensionless ratio R = N_ph / N_at, which describes a continuous crossover from an OMN-limited regime to an AGN-limited regime. The work claims that increasing optical probe power can degrade sensitivity by pushing the system into the AGN-dominated regime and identifies a critical threshold R_crit beyond which non-classical light provides no metrological advantage.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result supplies a practical, single-parameter optimization constraint for atomic sensors and identifies a fundamental limit on quantum-enhanced metrology. The elegance of reducing the noise behavior to the resource ratio R and the explicit crossover prediction are strengths that could directly inform experimental design in quantum sensing.

major comments (1)

The derivation of the AGN term from the discrete statistical model must be shown to recover the standard continuous-medium result in the large-N_at limit; without this explicit check the claim that AGN is the direct consequence of discreteness remains unverified.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the resource ratio alternates between R and script-R in the abstract; ensure uniform use of the symbol throughout the text and equations.
The manuscript would benefit from a brief comparison table or plot showing how the new scaling law reduces to known OMN-only expressions in the appropriate limit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment. We agree that an explicit verification of the large-N_at limit is needed to confirm consistency with the continuous-medium approximation, and we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The derivation of the AGN term from the discrete statistical model must be shown to recover the standard continuous-medium result in the large-N_at limit; without this explicit check the claim that AGN is the direct consequence of discreteness remains unverified.

Authors: We agree that an explicit check is required. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph (new Eq. (12) and surrounding text) taking the limit N_at → ∞ while holding R fixed. In this limit the atomic-granularity contribution to the variance vanishes as 1/N_at and the total noise expression reduces exactly to the standard photon-shot-noise (continuous-medium) result used in conventional treatments. This confirms that AGN is a finite-N_at correction arising directly from discreteness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained within introduced discrete-atom framework

full rationale

The paper introduces a discrete-atom statistical framework precisely to capture the breakdown of the continuous-medium approximation and the resulting atomic granularity noise (AGN). From this framework it derives the unified scaling law in the single parameter R = N_ph / N_at, the OMN-to-AGN crossover, the counter-intuitive optimization constraint, and the existence of R_crit. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation, or a redefinition of the target result; the central claims are outputs of the new framework rather than inputs renamed or presupposed. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the discrete statistical model and the definition of AGN. No explicit free parameters are mentioned in the abstract, but R_crit may involve derivation details not visible here.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The atomic system can be treated with a discrete-atom statistical framework that captures granularity effects.
This is the core new framework introduced to replace the continuous-medium approximation.

invented entities (1)

Atomic granularity noise (AGN) no independent evidence
purpose: Intrinsic noise arising from the discrete particulate nature of the atomic ensemble.
Newly defined in the paper to explain the additional noise source.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5516 in / 1321 out tokens · 52034 ms · 2026-05-10T19:48:41.478003+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Photon-Atom Granularity Noise Thermometry
physics.atom-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Granularity noise thermometry extracts temperature from the linear scaling of excess transmitted-light noise with photon-to-atom ratio using closed-form polarizability moments from the plasma dispersion function.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

H. M. Mott-Smith, The solution of the Boltzmann equation for a shock wave, Phys. Rev. 82, 885 (1951)

work page 1951
[2]

Koplik and J

J. Koplik and J. R. Banavar, Molecular simulation of reentrant corner flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2116 (1997)

work page 1997
[3]

Y ang, D

Y . Y ang, D. Zhu, W. Y an, A. Agarwal, M. Zheng, J. D. Joannopoulos, P . Lalanne, T. Christensen, K. K. Berggren, and M. Soljačić, A general theoretical and experimental framework for nanoscale electromagnetism, Nature 576, 248 (2019)

work page 2019
[4]

Majumder, N

M. Majumder, N. Chopra, R. Andrews, and B. J. Hinds, Nanoscale hydrodynamics: Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes, Nature 438, 44 (2005)

work page 2005
[5]

Kamrin and G

K. Kamrin and G. Koval, Nonlocal constitutive relation for steady granular flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 178301 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

Kim and K

H. Kim and K. Kamrin, Power-law scaling in granular rheology across flow geometries, Nat. Commun. 11, 2818 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, E. Mittag, D. J. Searles, and D. J. Evans, Experimental demonstration of violations of the Sec- ond Law of Thermodynamics for small systems and short time scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 050601 (2002)

work page 2002
[8]

I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V . Romalis, A sub-femtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer, Nature 422, 596 (2003)

work page 2003
[9]

Budker and M

D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007)

work page 2007
[10]

J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P . Shaffer, Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell utilizing electromagnetically induced transparency, Nat. Phys. 8, 819 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P . Shaffer, Rydberg atom quantum technologies, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53, 012002 (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Wolfgramm, A

F. Wolfgramm, A. Cere, F. A. Beduini, A. Predojević, M. Koschorreck, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light optical magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053601 (2010)

work page 2010
[13]

M. Jing, Y . Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy, Nat. Phys. 16, 911 (2020)

work page 2020
[14]

Sagle, R

J. Sagle, R. Namiotka, and J. Huennekens, Measurement and modelling of intensity dependent absorption and transit relax- ation on the Cesium line, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, 2629 (1996)

work page 1996
[15]

Rempe, R

G. Rempe, R. J. Thompson, R. J. Brecha, W. D. Lee, and H. J. Kimble, Optical bistability and photon statistics in nonclassical states of atoms and fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1727 (1991)

work page 1991
[16]

S. A. Crooker, D. G. Rickel, A. V . Balatsky, and D. L. Smith, Spectroscopy of spontaneous spin noise as a probe of spin dy- namics and magnetic resonance, Nature 431, 49 (2004)

work page 2004
[17]

W . M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, J. J. Bollinger, J. M. Gilligan, D. J. Heinzen, F. L. Moore, M. G. Raizen, and D. J. Wineland, Quan- tum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A 47, 3554 (1993)

work page 1993
[18]

Fleischhauer, A

M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P . Marangos, Electro- magnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005)

work page 2005
[19]

S1); the application of the general framework to Rydberg electrometry, including master equation solution in velocity space and transmission statistics (Sec

The Supplemental Material provides detailed derivations sup- porting the main text: the statistical framework of susceptibility as a sample statistic (Sec. S1); the application of the general framework to Rydberg electrometry, including master equation solution in velocity space and transmission statistics (Sec. S2); and the noise model for an optical mag...

work page
[20]

C.-R. Liu, R. Tao, X. Lv, Y . Dong, C. Li, B. Wei, and M. Zhou, Fisher-based sensitivity framework for rydberg-atom microwave electrometry, Phys. Rev. Appl. 25, 034052 (2026)

work page 2026
[21]

D. A. Steck, Quantum and Atom Optics , revision 0.16.6 ed. (2025) available online at https://atomoptics.uoregon .edu/~dsteck/teaching/quantum-optics/

work page 2025
[22]

Tanasittikosol, J

M. Tanasittikosol, J. D. Pritchard, D. Maxwell, A. Gauguet, K. J. Weatherill, R. M. Potvliege, and C. S. Adams, Microwave dress- ing of Rydberg dark states, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 184020 (2011)

work page 2011
[23]

Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in Rydberg states with neutral particles, J

A. Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in Rydberg states with neutral particles, J. Phys. (Paris) 38, 1343 (1977)

work page 1977
[24]

I. I. Fabrikant, Interaction of Rydberg atoms and thermal elec- trons with K, Rb and Cs atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19, 1527 (1986)

work page 1986
[25]

Fan, Microwave Electrometry with Rydberg Eletromagneti- cally Induced Transparency in Vapor Cells , Ph.D

H. Fan, Microwave Electrometry with Rydberg Eletromagneti- cally Induced Transparency in Vapor Cells , Ph.D. thesis , Uni- versity of Oklahoma (2015)

work page 2015
[26]

Kumar, H

S. Kumar, H. Q. Fan, H. Kübler, J. Sheng, and J. P . Shaffer, Atom-based sensing of weak radio frequency electric fields us- ing homodyne readout, Sci. Rep. 7, 42981 (2017)

work page 2017
[27]

J. S. Otto, N. Kjærgaard, and A. B. Deb, Towards Quantum In- formation Processing with Rydberg Atoms in an Interspecies K- Rb System, Ph.D. thesis, University of Otago (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

Fontaine, Paraxial fluid of light in hot atomic vapors , Ph.D

Q. Fontaine, Paraxial fluid of light in hot atomic vapors , Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne University (2020)

work page 2020
[29]

B. N. Miller, D. H. Meyer, T. Virtanen, C. M. O’Brien, and K. C. Cox, Rydiqule: A graph-based paradigm for modeling Ryd- berg and atomic sensors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 294, 108952 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Nagib and T

O. Nagib and T. G. Walker, Exact steady state of perturbed open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033076 (2025)

work page 2025
[31]

C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P . Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

work page 2017
[32]

C. C. Gerry and P . L. Knight, Introductory quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023)

work page 2023

[1] [1]

H. M. Mott-Smith, The solution of the Boltzmann equation for a shock wave, Phys. Rev. 82, 885 (1951)

work page 1951

[2] [2]

Koplik and J

J. Koplik and J. R. Banavar, Molecular simulation of reentrant corner flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2116 (1997)

work page 1997

[3] [3]

Y ang, D

Y . Y ang, D. Zhu, W. Y an, A. Agarwal, M. Zheng, J. D. Joannopoulos, P . Lalanne, T. Christensen, K. K. Berggren, and M. Soljačić, A general theoretical and experimental framework for nanoscale electromagnetism, Nature 576, 248 (2019)

work page 2019

[4] [4]

Majumder, N

M. Majumder, N. Chopra, R. Andrews, and B. J. Hinds, Nanoscale hydrodynamics: Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes, Nature 438, 44 (2005)

work page 2005

[5] [5]

Kamrin and G

K. Kamrin and G. Koval, Nonlocal constitutive relation for steady granular flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 178301 (2012)

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Kim and K

H. Kim and K. Kamrin, Power-law scaling in granular rheology across flow geometries, Nat. Commun. 11, 2818 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, E. Mittag, D. J. Searles, and D. J. Evans, Experimental demonstration of violations of the Sec- ond Law of Thermodynamics for small systems and short time scales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 050601 (2002)

work page 2002

[8] [8]

I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V . Romalis, A sub-femtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer, Nature 422, 596 (2003)

work page 2003

[9] [9]

Budker and M

D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007)

work page 2007

[10] [10]

J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P . Shaffer, Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell utilizing electromagnetically induced transparency, Nat. Phys. 8, 819 (2012)

work page 2012

[11] [11]

C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P . Shaffer, Rydberg atom quantum technologies, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53, 012002 (2020)

work page 2020

[12] [12]

Wolfgramm, A

F. Wolfgramm, A. Cere, F. A. Beduini, A. Predojević, M. Koschorreck, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light optical magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053601 (2010)

work page 2010

[13] [13]

M. Jing, Y . Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy, Nat. Phys. 16, 911 (2020)

work page 2020

[14] [14]

Sagle, R

J. Sagle, R. Namiotka, and J. Huennekens, Measurement and modelling of intensity dependent absorption and transit relax- ation on the Cesium line, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, 2629 (1996)

work page 1996

[15] [15]

Rempe, R

G. Rempe, R. J. Thompson, R. J. Brecha, W. D. Lee, and H. J. Kimble, Optical bistability and photon statistics in nonclassical states of atoms and fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1727 (1991)

work page 1991

[16] [16]

S. A. Crooker, D. G. Rickel, A. V . Balatsky, and D. L. Smith, Spectroscopy of spontaneous spin noise as a probe of spin dy- namics and magnetic resonance, Nature 431, 49 (2004)

work page 2004

[17] [17]

W . M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, J. J. Bollinger, J. M. Gilligan, D. J. Heinzen, F. L. Moore, M. G. Raizen, and D. J. Wineland, Quan- tum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A 47, 3554 (1993)

work page 1993

[18] [18]

Fleischhauer, A

M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P . Marangos, Electro- magnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005)

work page 2005

[19] [19]

S1); the application of the general framework to Rydberg electrometry, including master equation solution in velocity space and transmission statistics (Sec

The Supplemental Material provides detailed derivations sup- porting the main text: the statistical framework of susceptibility as a sample statistic (Sec. S1); the application of the general framework to Rydberg electrometry, including master equation solution in velocity space and transmission statistics (Sec. S2); and the noise model for an optical mag...

work page

[20] [20]

C.-R. Liu, R. Tao, X. Lv, Y . Dong, C. Li, B. Wei, and M. Zhou, Fisher-based sensitivity framework for rydberg-atom microwave electrometry, Phys. Rev. Appl. 25, 034052 (2026)

work page 2026

[21] [21]

D. A. Steck, Quantum and Atom Optics , revision 0.16.6 ed. (2025) available online at https://atomoptics.uoregon .edu/~dsteck/teaching/quantum-optics/

work page 2025

[22] [22]

Tanasittikosol, J

M. Tanasittikosol, J. D. Pritchard, D. Maxwell, A. Gauguet, K. J. Weatherill, R. M. Potvliege, and C. S. Adams, Microwave dress- ing of Rydberg dark states, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 184020 (2011)

work page 2011

[23] [23]

Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in Rydberg states with neutral particles, J

A. Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in Rydberg states with neutral particles, J. Phys. (Paris) 38, 1343 (1977)

work page 1977

[24] [24]

I. I. Fabrikant, Interaction of Rydberg atoms and thermal elec- trons with K, Rb and Cs atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19, 1527 (1986)

work page 1986

[25] [25]

Fan, Microwave Electrometry with Rydberg Eletromagneti- cally Induced Transparency in Vapor Cells , Ph.D

H. Fan, Microwave Electrometry with Rydberg Eletromagneti- cally Induced Transparency in Vapor Cells , Ph.D. thesis , Uni- versity of Oklahoma (2015)

work page 2015

[26] [26]

Kumar, H

S. Kumar, H. Q. Fan, H. Kübler, J. Sheng, and J. P . Shaffer, Atom-based sensing of weak radio frequency electric fields us- ing homodyne readout, Sci. Rep. 7, 42981 (2017)

work page 2017

[27] [27]

J. S. Otto, N. Kjærgaard, and A. B. Deb, Towards Quantum In- formation Processing with Rydberg Atoms in an Interspecies K- Rb System, Ph.D. thesis, University of Otago (2022)

work page 2022

[28] [28]

Fontaine, Paraxial fluid of light in hot atomic vapors , Ph.D

Q. Fontaine, Paraxial fluid of light in hot atomic vapors , Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne University (2020)

work page 2020

[29] [29]

B. N. Miller, D. H. Meyer, T. Virtanen, C. M. O’Brien, and K. C. Cox, Rydiqule: A graph-based paradigm for modeling Ryd- berg and atomic sensors, Comput. Phys. Commun. 294, 108952 (2024)

work page 2024

[30] [30]

Nagib and T

O. Nagib and T. G. Walker, Exact steady state of perturbed open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033076 (2025)

work page 2025

[31] [31]

C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P . Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

work page 2017

[32] [32]

C. C. Gerry and P . L. Knight, Introductory quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023)

work page 2023