arxiv: 2604.05545 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 📡 eess.AS

Recognition: no theorem link

Multimodal Deep Learning Method for Real-Time Spatial Room Impulse Response Computing

Zhiyu Li , Xinwen Yue , Shenghui Zhao , Jing Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS

keywords spatial room impulse responsemultimodal deep learninggeometrical acousticsreal-time auralizationvirtual reality audioroom acoustics simulation

0 comments

The pith

A multimodal neural network generates full spatial room impulse responses from scene geometry and low-order reflection waveforms computed by geometrical acoustics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a deep learning approach for computing spatial room impulse responses in real time for virtual reality auralization. It employs a multimodal model that receives scene information such as geometry, acoustic properties, and source-listener coordinates, together with low-order reflection waveforms precomputed via geometrical acoustics. This input combination enables the network to output complete SRIRs that include higher-order reflections. A new dataset spanning multiple scenes and their corresponding SRIRs was constructed for training and testing. Experiments show the model produces more accurate results than prior techniques while supporting integration with personalized head-related transfer functions.

Core claim

The authors introduce a multimodal deep learning model that predicts complete spatial room impulse responses by taking as input scene features and low-order reflections calculated in real time using geometrical acoustics methods. They construct a dataset of multiple scenes paired with their SRIRs and demonstrate that the model outperforms previous techniques in generating realistic audio for unseen environments.

What carries the argument

The multimodal deep learning model that fuses scene geometry, acoustic properties, source and listener coordinates with low-order reflection waveforms computed via geometrical acoustics to output full spatial room impulse responses.

If this is right

Real-time scene-specific SRIR computation becomes practical for interactive virtual environments.
Only low-order reflections need explicit geometrical calculation, lowering overall simulation cost.
Generated SRIRs integrate directly with personalized head-related transfer functions for individualized audio.
A single trained model handles multiple scenes without per-scene recomputation of higher-order effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could support dynamic scenes if the network is extended to accept time-varying inputs.
Hybrid systems might combine this network with other simulation techniques for adjustable accuracy-speed trade-offs.
Direct comparison against measured impulse responses from physical rooms would expose gaps between simulated training data and real acoustics.

Load-bearing premise

Low-order reflections computed by geometrical acoustics together with scene features contain enough information for the network to accurately predict higher-order spatial room impulse responses across diverse unseen scenes.

What would settle it

Evaluating the model's predicted SRIRs against ground-truth measurements taken in a physical room whose geometry, materials, and layout differ substantially from any scene in the training dataset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05545 by Jing Wang, Shenghui Zhao, Xinwen Yue, Zhiyu Li.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overall framework of the Multimodal DL-based model. complexity while also providing a natural interface for incorporating personalized HRTFs. Personalized HRTFs can further enhance perceptual quality [11]. Therefore, SRIRs offer substantial advantages as model outputs. 2.2. Deep Learning Method Several DL-based methods for RIR computation have been proposed. Neural Acoustic Fields (NAF)[12] achieve high … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The block diagram highlights the details of the LoR encoder and the SRIR parameter decoder. The output of the LoR encoder is concatenated with the output of the Scene Transformer and subsequently fed into the SRIR parameter decoder. reverberation energy gLR; 3) Late Reverberation Decoder: generates the energy-normalized subband envelopes of late reverberation, ELR. The Parameter Synthesizer (PS) reconst… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose a multimodal deep learning model for VR auralization that generates spatial room impulse responses (SRIRs) in real time to reconstruct scene-specific auditory perception. Employing SRIRs as the output reduces computational complexity and facilitates integration with personalized head-related transfer functions. The model takes two modalities as input: scene information and waveforms, where the waveform corresponds to the low-order reflections (LoR). LoR can be efficiently computed using geometrical acoustics (GA) but remains difficult for deep learning models to predict accurately. Scene geometry, acoustic properties, source coordinates, and listener coordinates are first used to compute LoR in real time via GA, and both LoR and these features are subsequently provided as inputs to the model. A new dataset was constructed, consisting of multiple scenes and their corresponding SRIRs. The dataset exhibits greater diversity. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper combines GA low-order reflections with scene features in a multimodal net to predict full SRIRs and releases a new dataset, but supplies no architecture, metrics, or held-out results to show the approach actually works.

read the letter

The core idea is to let geometrical acoustics handle the low-order reflections in real time, then feed those waveforms plus static scene data into a neural net that fills in the higher-order reflections, late reverberation, and spatial cues for the full SRIR. They also built a new multi-scene dataset that they say is more diverse than earlier ones. That split and the dataset are the concrete additions here.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a multimodal deep learning model for real-time generation of spatial room impulse responses (SRIRs) to enable scene-specific auditory perception in VR auralization. The model takes as input scene geometry, acoustic properties, source/listener coordinates, and low-order reflection (LoR) waveforms efficiently computed via geometrical acoustics (GA); these are fed to a neural network that predicts the full SRIR (including higher-order reflections and late reverberation). A new, more diverse dataset of multiple scenes and corresponding SRIRs is introduced, and the authors claim that experimental results demonstrate superior performance of the proposed approach.

Significance. If substantiated, the work would offer a practical hybrid GA+DL pathway for real-time SRIR synthesis that avoids the full computational cost of wave-based simulation while still producing scene-specific responses suitable for integration with personalized HRTFs. The construction of a diverse dataset is a constructive step toward better generalization in acoustic modeling. However, the current lack of architecture, training, and quantitative validation details substantially limits the immediate impact and verifiability of the claimed advance.

major comments (3)

[Experimental results / abstract] The manuscript asserts 'superior performance' and the ability to predict full higher-order SRIRs from LoR plus scene features, yet provides no quantitative metrics (e.g., SRIR MSE, EDT or T60 error, spatial coherence measures, or perceptual listening-test scores) and no baseline comparisons. This directly undermines evaluation of the central claim that the model accurately synthesizes the missing higher-order and late-reverberation components on unseen scenes.
[Dataset and evaluation sections] No information is given on the train/test split protocol, scene diversity metrics, or whether test scenes differ in geometry/materials from the training set. Without this, it is impossible to determine whether reported gains reflect genuine inference of higher-order reflections or merely memorization of similar training environments, which is load-bearing for the generalization claim.
[Methods / model description] The model architecture, multimodal fusion strategy, loss function, and training procedure are not described. These details are required to assess whether the network can plausibly recover the spatial and temporal structure of the full SRIR from the provided LoR waveforms and static scene metadata.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one key quantitative result (e.g., error reduction relative to baselines) to support the superiority claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive review. The comments correctly identify areas where the manuscript would benefit from greater detail and transparency. We will revise the paper to incorporate the requested information on metrics, dataset protocols, and model specifics while preserving the core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The manuscript asserts 'superior performance' and the ability to predict full higher-order SRIRs from LoR plus scene features, yet provides no quantitative metrics (e.g., SRIR MSE, EDT or T60 error, spatial coherence measures, or perceptual listening-test scores) and no baseline comparisons. This directly undermines evaluation of the central claim that the model accurately synthesizes the missing higher-order and late-reverberation components on unseen scenes.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative results and baselines are essential to support the performance claims. The current manuscript reports only qualitative superiority; the revised version will add concrete metrics including waveform MSE, T60 and EDT errors, spatial coherence, and listening-test scores, together with comparisons against pure geometrical acoustics and prior neural baselines. revision: yes
Referee: No information is given on the train/test split protocol, scene diversity metrics, or whether test scenes differ in geometry/materials from the training set. Without this, it is impossible to determine whether reported gains reflect genuine inference of higher-order reflections or merely memorization of similar training environments, which is load-bearing for the generalization claim.

Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The dataset was constructed with multiple distinct scenes varying in geometry, materials, and source/listener positions. In the revision we will explicitly state the train/test split (e.g., 80/20 with completely disjoint scenes for testing), report diversity statistics, and confirm that test scenes differ in both geometry and acoustic properties from the training set to substantiate generalization. revision: yes
Referee: The model architecture, multimodal fusion strategy, loss function, and training procedure are not described. These details are required to assess whether the network can plausibly recover the spatial and temporal structure of the full SRIR from the provided LoR waveforms and static scene metadata.

Authors: The manuscript provides only a high-level overview of the multimodal inputs. The revised manuscript will include a detailed description of the network architecture (e.g., convolutional and recurrent layers), the fusion mechanism (concatenation followed by attention), the loss function (time-domain and frequency-domain terms), and the full training procedure with hyperparameters, optimizer, and data augmentation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard ML pipeline with new dataset and empirical validation

full rationale

The paper presents a multimodal deep learning model that takes scene geometry/acoustic properties plus GA-computed low-order reflection waveforms as inputs to predict full SRIRs. A new diverse dataset of scenes and corresponding SRIRs is constructed for training and evaluation, with experimental results claimed to show superior performance. No step in the described chain reduces by construction to its own inputs: the model learns the mapping from data rather than defining the target via fitted parameters or self-referential equations; no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked; and the derivation does not rename known results or smuggle ansatzes. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks via the held-out dataset comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient technical detail to enumerate specific free parameters or invented entities; the approach relies on standard deep learning assumptions and the domain assumption that GA accurately models low-order reflections.

free parameters (1)

neural network hyperparameters and weights
Deep learning models contain numerous parameters fitted during training on the new dataset.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Geometrical acoustics methods accurately and efficiently compute low-order reflections from scene geometry and acoustic properties.
Invoked when using GA to generate LoR waveforms as model input.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5456 in / 1181 out tokens · 38490 ms · 2026-05-10T19:22:37.396185+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

It refers to modeling the sound field of a scene so that the sound of a source becomes perceptible

INTRODUCTION Auralization in virtual reality (VR) is crucial for enhancing the sense of presence [1]. It refers to modeling the sound field of a scene so that the sound of a source becomes perceptible. Since VR scenes are inherently interactive, auralization must respond in real time to user actions. A common approach is to com- pute the room impulse resp...
[2]

Multimodal Deep Learning Method for Real-Time Spatial Room Impulse Response Computing

RELATED WORKS 2.1. MRIR, BRIR and SRIR RIRs are typically divided into direct sound, early reflections, and late reverberation [4], each influencing auditory percep- tion differently. The waveforms of the direct sound and early reflections provide source localization and width cues through binaural effect [5][6]; the direct-to-reverberant energy ratio (DR...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[3]

Problem Formulation We propose a scene-waveform multimodal deep learning ap- proach for SRIR computation and design a model denoted asF

OUR APPROACH 3.1. Problem Formulation We propose a scene-waveform multimodal deep learning ap- proach for SRIR computation and design a model denoted asF. The model takes as input the scene information (scene geome- try, acoustic properties), source and listener coordinates, and the LoR waveforms corresponding to these coordinates. The scene geometry and ...
[4]

Benchmark Systems MESH2IR [14]:This model takes scene geometry (without acoustic properties) together with source and listener coordi- nates as input, and outputs MRIRs

EXPERIMENT AND RESULTS 4.1. Benchmark Systems MESH2IR [14]:This model takes scene geometry (without acoustic properties) together with source and listener coordi- nates as input, and outputs MRIRs. In this work, we modify its output channels to generate SRIRs. The model produces RIRs of length 4096, which, at a 48 kHz sampling rate, cover only early refle...
[5]

We propose a scene-waveform multimodal model that com- putes SRIRs in real time from scene geometry, acoustic prop- erties, source-listener coordinates, and LoR waveform

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK This study addresses the challenge of auralization in VR scenar- ios. We propose a scene-waveform multimodal model that com- putes SRIRs in real time from scene geometry, acoustic prop- erties, source-listener coordinates, and LoR waveform. For the first time, LoR is incorporated as auxiliary modality to enhance model performanc...
[6]

Better presence and performance in vir- tual environments by improved binaural sound rendering,

Pontus Larsson, “Better presence and performance in vir- tual environments by improved binaural sound rendering,” inProc. AES 22nd Int. Conf., Espoo, Finland, June 15-17, 2002, 2002

2002
[7]

The percept of reverberation is not affected by visual room impression in virtual environments,

Michael Schutte, Stephan D Ewert, and Lutz Wiegrebe, “The percept of reverberation is not affected by visual room impression in virtual environments,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. EL229–EL235, 2019

2019
[8]

Au- ralization uses in acoustical design: A survey study of acoustical consultants,

David Thery, Vincent Boccara, and Brian FG Katz, “Au- ralization uses in acoustical design: A survey study of acoustical consultants,”The Journal of the Acoustical So- ciety of America, vol. 145, no. 6, pp. 3446–3456, 2019

2019
[9]

Fifty years of artificial reverberation,

Vesa Valimaki, Julian D Parker, Lauri Savioja, Julius O Smith, and Jonathan S Abel, “Fifty years of artificial reverberation,”IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1421–1448, 2012

2012
[10]

Jens Blauert,Spatial hearing: the psychophysics of hu- man sound localization, MIT press, 1997

1997
[11]

Lateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness,

Tapio Lokki and Jukka P ¨atynen, “Lateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. EL345–EL351, 2011

2011
[12]

Auditory distance perception in rooms,

Adelbert W Bronkhorst and Tammo Houtgast, “Auditory distance perception in rooms,”Nature, vol. 397, no. 6719, pp. 517–520, 1999

1999
[13]

Perceptual analysis of directional late reverberation,

Benoit Alary, Pierre Mass ´e, Sebastian J Schlecht, Markus Noisternig, and Vesa V ¨alim¨aki, “Perceptual analysis of directional late reverberation,”The Journal of the Acous- tical Society of America, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 3189–3199, 2021

2021
[14]

Spatial impulse response rendering i: Analysis and synthesis,

Juha Merimaa and Ville Pulkki, “Spatial impulse response rendering i: Analysis and synthesis,”Journal of the audio engineering Society, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1115–1127, 2005

2005
[15]

Parametric binaural reproduction of higher-order spatial impulse responses,

Christoph Hold, Leo McCormack, and Ville Pulkki, “Parametric binaural reproduction of higher-order spatial impulse responses,” in24th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA), 2022

2022
[16]

Spatial sound-history, principle, progress and challenge,

Bosun Xie, “Spatial sound-history, principle, progress and challenge,”Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 397–416, 2020

2020
[17]

Learning neural acoustic fields,

Andrew Luo, Yilun Du, Michael Tarr, Josh Tenenbaum, Antonio Torralba, and Chuang Gan, “Learning neural acoustic fields,”Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 3165–3177, 2022

2022
[18]

Few-shot audio-visual learning of en- vironment acoustics,

Sagnik Majumder, Changan Chen, Ziad Al-Halah, and Kristen Grauman, “Few-shot audio-visual learning of en- vironment acoustics,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 2522–2536, 2022

2022
[19]

MESH2IR: Neural acoustic impulse response generator for complex 3d scenes,

Anton Ratnarajah, Zhenyu Tang, Rohith Aralikatti, and Dinesh Manocha, “MESH2IR: Neural acoustic impulse response generator for complex 3d scenes,” inProceed- ings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multi- media, 2022, pp. 924–933

2022
[20]

Listen2Scene: Interactive material-aware binaural sound propagation for reconstructed 3d scenes,

Anton Ratnarajah and Dinesh Manocha, “Listen2Scene: Interactive material-aware binaural sound propagation for reconstructed 3d scenes,” in2024 IEEE Conference Vir- tual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 2024, pp. 254–264

2024
[21]

M2PAIR: A high-quality acoustic impulse re- sponse computation model,

Zhiyu Li, Xinpei Zhao, Jing Wang, Xinyuan Qian, and Xi- ang Xie, “M2PAIR: A high-quality acoustic impulse re- sponse computation model,” inICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

2025
[22]

Room impulse response calculation model for virtual reality scenarios,

Zhiyu Li, Jing Wang, Xinwen Yue, Lidong Yang, Shenghui Zhao, and Xiang Xie, “Room impulse response calculation model for virtual reality scenarios,”ACTA ACUSTICA, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1186–1196, 2024

2024
[23]

Hearing anywhere in any environ- ment,

Xiulong Liu, Anurag Kumar, Paul Calamia, Sebastia V Amengual, Calvin Murdock, Ishwarya Ananthabhotla, Philip Robinson, Eli Shlizerman, Vamsi Krishna Ithapu, and Ruohan Gao, “Hearing anywhere in any environ- ment,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 5732–5741

2025
[24]

Graph U-Nets,

Hongyang Gao and Shuiwang Ji, “Graph U-Nets,” in international conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 2083–2092

2019
[25]

GW A: A large high-quality acous- tic dataset for audio processing,

Zhenyu Tang, Rohith Aralikatti, Anton Jeran Ratnarajah, and Dinesh Manocha, “GW A: A large high-quality acous- tic dataset for audio processing,” inACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings, 2022, pp. 1–9

2022
[26]

3D-FRONT: 3D furnished rooms with layouts and semantics,

Huan Fu, Bowen Cai, Lin Gao, Ling-Xiao Zhang, Jiaming Wang, Cao Li, Qixun Zeng, Chengyue Sun, Rongfei Jia, Binqiang Zhao, et al., “3D-FRONT: 3D furnished rooms with layouts and semantics,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 10933–10942

2021
[27]

Improving reverberant speech training using diffuse acoustic simulation,

Zhenyu Tang, Lianwu Chen, Bo Wu, Dong Yu, and Di- nesh Manocha, “Improving reverberant speech training using diffuse acoustic simulation,” inICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2020, pp. 6969–6973

2020
[28]

Soundspaces 2.0: A simulation platform for visual-acoustic learning,

Changan Chen, Carl Schissler, Sanchit Garg, Philip Kobernik, Alexander Clegg, Paul Calamia, Dhruv Batra, Philip Robinson, and Kristen Grauman, “Soundspaces 2.0: A simulation platform for visual-acoustic learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 8896–8911, 2022

2022
[29]

Heinrich Kuttruff,Room acoustics, Crc Press, 2016

2016
[30]

Recommenda- tion ITU-R BS.1534-3: Method for the subjective assess- ment of intermediate quality level of audio systems,

International Telecommunication Union, “Recommenda- tion ITU-R BS.1534-3: Method for the subjective assess- ment of intermediate quality level of audio systems,” Stan- dard BS.1534-3, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015

2015