pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05644 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· math-ph· math.MP· math.PR

Long-time behavior of exact and numerical solutions of stochastic evolution equations on the sphere

David Cohen , Bj\"orn M\"uller , Andrea Papini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAmath-phmath.MPmath.PR
keywords stochastic evolution equationslong-time behaviortrace formulasstochastic exponential integratorEuler-Maruyama methodswave equationSchrödinger equationMaxwell equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The stochastic exponential integrator preserves long-time trace formulas for energy, mass, and momentum in linear stochastic PDEs on the sphere, while Euler-Maruyama schemes do not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the long-time behavior of solutions to linear stochastic evolution equations on the sphere, including the wave, Schrödinger, and Maxwell equations. It derives trace formulas that describe how energy, mass, and momentum evolve in the exact solutions depending on the forcing. Numerical analysis then shows that standard forward and backward Euler-Maruyama schemes produce incorrect asymptotic behavior for these quantities. In contrast, the stochastic exponential integrator is proven to match the exact trace formulas exactly.

Core claim

For linear stochastic evolution equations on the sphere, the exact solutions satisfy trace formulas for physically relevant quantities such as energy, mass, and momentum. The forward and backward Euler-Maruyama methods fail to reproduce these formulas in the long-time limit, whereas the stochastic exponential integrator preserves them exactly for the three models considered.

What carries the argument

The stochastic exponential integrator, which applies the exact semigroup operator to the linear deterministic part and adds the stochastic integral directly, is the mechanism that maintains the trace formulas.

Load-bearing premise

The equations must be linear so that explicit trace formulas for energy, mass, and momentum can be derived from the forcing terms.

What would settle it

A long-time numerical simulation of one of the three equations using the stochastic exponential integrator that shows growing deviation from the expected trace formula value would falsify the preservation result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05644 by Andrea Papini, Bj\"orn M\"uller, David Cohen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Expected energy of the stochastic wave equation on the sphere (8): The stochastic trigonometric scheme (30) (STM), the forward Euler– Maruyama scheme (21) (EM), and the backward Euler–Maruyama scheme (26) (BEM). the same, in particular we keep N “ 500, so that the time step is τ “ 0.2. Figure 1b shows the result of this numerical simulation. Due to the poor long-time behavior, with respect to the expected … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Expected energy of the stochastic wave equation on the sphere (8) driven by a L´evy process with nonzero mean: The adapted stochastic trigono￾metric scheme (30) (aSTM), the forward Euler–Maruyama scheme (21) (EM), and the backward Euler–Maruyama scheme (26) (BEM). Note that the proofs of our results are conceptually similar to those in Section 3, however in some cases more technically involved. Therefore, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Expected mass of the stochastic Schr¨odinger equation on the sphere (9): The stochastic exponential Euler scheme (47) (ExpEuler), the for￾ward Euler–Maruyama scheme (38) (EM), and the backward Euler–Maruyama scheme (41) (BEM). We further performed a long-time simulation of the behavior of the mass of the stochastic exponential Euler and backward Euler–Maruyama methods. Due to the rapid explosion of the mas… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Expected energy of the stochastic Schr¨odinger equation on the sphere (9): The stochastic exponential Euler scheme (47) (ExpEuler), the for￾ward Euler–Maruyama scheme (38) (EM), and the backward Euler–Maruyama scheme (38) (BEM). 5. Stochastic Maxwell’s equations on the sphere Maxwell’s equations form the foundation of classical electromagnetism and are tradition￾ally formulated in three-dimensional Euclide… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expected energy of the stochastic Maxwell’s equations on the sphere (57): Exact solution and stochastic exponential Euler scheme (65) (Ex￾pEuler) the forward Euler–Maruyama scheme (38) (EM), and the backward Euler–Maruyama scheme (41) (BEM). 6. Acknowledgements The work of DC was partially supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR) (projects nr. 2018 ´ 04443 and 2024 ´ 04536). The work of DC, BM, and A… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the long-time behavior of exact solutions and numerical approximations of linear stochastic evolution equations defined on the sphere. We focus on three classical models arising in mathematical physics: the stochastic wave equation, the stochastic Schr\"odinger equation, and the stochastic Maxwell's equations. For these SPDEs, we analyze several widely used time integrators with respect to trace formulas describing the evolution of physically relevant quantities such as energy, mass, and momentum dependent on the forcing term. In particular, we prove that the forward and backward Euler-Maruyama schemes fail to reproduce the correct long-time behavior of the exact solutions. In addition, we prove that the stochastic exponential integrator preserves the correct long-time behavior of the physical quantities of interest. Finally, several numerical experiments are provided to illustrate our theoretical findings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the long-time behavior of exact solutions and numerical approximations for three linear stochastic evolution equations on the sphere: the stochastic wave equation, the stochastic Schrödinger equation, and stochastic Maxwell's equations. It derives trace formulas for physically relevant quantities such as energy, mass, and momentum that depend on the forcing term, proves that the forward and backward Euler-Maruyama schemes fail to reproduce the correct long-time asymptotics of the exact solutions, demonstrates that the stochastic exponential integrator preserves these trace formulas exactly, and illustrates the findings with numerical experiments.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a rigorous justification for preferring stochastic exponential integrators in long-time simulations of linear SPDEs on the sphere, where preservation of invariants is critical. The explicit derivations via mild solutions and Itô calculus, together with the numerical validation, constitute a clear strength; the restriction to linear problems with additive noise that admits closed-form traces further strengthens the results by enabling precise comparisons without additional modeling assumptions.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the statement that 'several numerical experiments are provided to illustrate our theoretical findings' would be more informative if it briefly indicated which of the three models and which trace formulas are tested numerically.
  2. The notation and precise definitions of the trace formulas (energy, mass, momentum) should be introduced with a dedicated preliminary subsection before their use in the proofs of preservation or non-preservation, to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  3. The description of the spherical discretization (e.g., truncation level of spherical harmonics or finite-element spaces) in the numerical experiments section should include explicit parameter values and convergence checks to facilitate reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We sincerely thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our manuscript on the long-time behavior of exact and numerical solutions for linear stochastic evolution equations on the sphere. We appreciate the recognition of the rigorous derivations via mild solutions and Itô calculus, as well as the numerical validation demonstrating the advantages of the stochastic exponential integrator in preserving trace formulas for energy, mass, and momentum. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we will incorporate improvements to enhance the manuscript accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proofs are direct verifications for linear SPDEs

full rationale

The paper derives exact trace formulas for energy, mass, and momentum from the mild solution and Itô calculus applied to the linear stochastic evolution equations. It then verifies that the stochastic exponential integrator reproduces the exact linear evolution operator and integrated stochastic convolution, thereby satisfying identical discrete trace relations. This is a self-contained mathematical argument relying on linearity and additive forcing to obtain closed-form expressions; no data fitting, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations are used to establish the preservation property. The failure of Euler-Maruyama schemes is shown by explicit counterexamples to the same trace relations. The derivation chain does not reduce any claimed result to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard assumptions for linear SPDEs and the existence of trace formulas; no free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The stochastic evolution equations are linear.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the focus of the study.
  • domain assumption Trace formulas exist that describe the evolution of energy, mass, and momentum depending on the forcing term.
    The analysis is performed with respect to these trace formulas.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5443 in / 1223 out tokens · 44286 ms · 2026-05-10T18:59:49.451507+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. D. Akrivis. Finite difference discretization of the cu bic Schr¨ odinger equation.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 13(1):115–124, January 1993

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    Alodat, Q

    T. Alodat, Q. T. Le Gia, and I. H. Sloan. On approximation f or time-fractional stochastic diffusion equations on the unit sphere. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , 446:Paper No. 115863, 33, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    V. V. Anh, P. Broadbridge, A. Olenko, and Y. G. Wang. On app roximation for fractional stochastic partial differential equations on the sphere. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment , 32(9):2585–2603, Sep 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Antoine, W

    X. Antoine, W. Bao, and C. Besse. Computational methods f or the dynamics of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger/Gross–Pitaevskii equations.Computer Physics Communications , 184(12):2621–2633, Decem- ber 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Anton and D

    R. Anton and D. Cohen. Exponential integrators for stoch astic Schr¨ odinger equations driven by Itˆ o noise. J. Comput. Math. , 36(2):276–309, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Anton, D

    R. Anton, D. Cohen, S. Larsson, and X. Wang. Full discreti zation of semilinear stochastic wave equations driven by multiplicative noise. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 54(2):1093–1119, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Banjai, G

    L. Banjai, G. Lord, and J. Molla. Strong convergence of a V erlet integrator for the semilinear stochastic wave equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 59(4):1976–2003, 2021

    work page 1976

  8. [8]

    Vector spherical h armonics and their application to magneto- statics

    R G Barrera, G A Estevez, and J Giraldo. Vector spherical h armonics and their application to magneto- statics. European Journal of Physics , 6(4):287, oct 1985. LONG-TIME BEHA VIOR OF STOCHASTIC EVOLUTION EQUATIONS ON TH E SPHERE 33

    work page 1985

  9. [9]

    C. Besse. A Relaxation Scheme for the Nonlinear Schr¨ odi nger Equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 42(3):934–952, January 2004

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Besse, S

    C. Besse, S. Descombes, G. Dujardin, and I. Lacroix-Vio let. Energy-preserving methods for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 41(1):618–653, January 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Brandt, L

    C. Brandt, L. Scandolo, E. Eisemann, and K. Hildebrandt . Spectral processing of tangential vector fields. Computer Graphics Forum , 36(6):338–353, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Brze´ zniak and S

    Z. Brze´ zniak and S. Cerrai. Stochastic wave equations with constraints: well-posedness and Smoluchowski- Kramers diffusion approximation. Comm. Math. Phys. , 406(9):Paper No. 223, 59, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Brze´ zniak and J

    Z. Brze´ zniak and J. Hussain. Global solution of nonlin ear stochastic heat equation with solutions in a Hilbert manifold. Stoch. Dyn. , 20(6):2040012, 29, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Brze´ zniak and M

    Z. Brze´ zniak and M. Ondrej´ at. Strong solutions to sto chastic wave equations with values in Riemannian manifolds. J. Funct. Anal. , 253(2):449–481, 2007

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Burrage and P

    K. Burrage and P. M. Burrage. Low rank Runge-Kutta metho ds, symplecticity and stochastic Hamiltonian problems with additive noise. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , 236(16):3920–3930, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    P. M. Burrage and K. Burrage. Structure-preserving Run ge-Kutta methods for stochastic Hamiltonian equations with additive noise. Numer. Algorithms , 65(3):519–532, 2014

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    W. E. Byerly. An Elementary Treatise on Fourier’s Series and Spherical, C ylindrical, and Ellipsoidal Harmonics: With Applications to Problems in Mathematical P hysics. Ginn, 1893

    work page

  18. [18]

    Cabral and F

    F. Cabral and F. S. N. Lobo. Electrodynamics and Spaceti me Geometry: Foundations. Foundations of Physics, 47(2):208–228, 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    R. Carles. Semi-Classical Analysis For Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equations. World Scientific Publishing Com- pany, Singapore, 2008

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    C. Chen, D. Cohen, R. D’Ambrosio, and A. Lang. Drift-pre serving numerical integrators for stochastic Hamiltonian systems. Adv. Comput. Math. , 46(2):Paper No. 27, 22, 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    C. Chen, J. Hong, and L. Zhang. Preservation of physical properties of stochastic Maxwell equations with additive noise via stochastic multi-symplectic methods. J. Comput. Phys. , 306:500–519, 2016

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    S. Chun. Method of moving frames to solve time-dependen t Maxwell’s equations on anisotropic curved surfaces: Applications to invisible cloak and ELF propagat ion. J. Comput. Phys. , 340:85–104, 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    S. Chun, J. Marcon, J. Peir´ o, and S. J. Sherwin. Reducin g errors caused by geometrical inaccuracy to solve partial differential equations with moving frames on c urvilinear domain. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 398:Paper No. 115261, 24, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    D. Cohen. On the numerical discretisation of stochasti c oscillators. Math. Comput. Simulation , 82(8):1478– 1495, 2012

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Cohen, J

    D. Cohen, J. Cui, J. Hong, and L. Sun. Exponential integr ators for stochastic Maxwell’s equations driven by Itˆ o noise.J. Comput. Phys. , 410:109382, 21, 2020

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Cohen and L

    D. Cohen and L. Gauckler. One-stage exponential integr ators for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations over long times. BIT Numerical Mathematics , 52(4):877–903, December 2012

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Cohen, S

    D. Cohen, S. Di Giovacchino, and A. Lang. Fully discrete approximation of the semilinear stochastic wave equation on the sphere, 2026

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    Cohen and A

    D. Cohen and A. Lang. Numerical approximation and simul ation of the stochastic wave equation on the sphere. Calcolo, 59(3):Paper No. 32, 32, 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Cohen, S

    D. Cohen, S. Larsson, and M. Sigg. A trigonometric metho d for the linear stochastic wave equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 51(1):204–222, 2013

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Cohen and M

    D. Cohen and M. Sigg. Convergence analysis of trigonome tric methods for stiff second-order stochastic differential equations. Numer. Math. , 121(1):1–29, 2012

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Cohen and G

    D. Cohen and G. Vilmart. Drift-preserving numerical in tegrators for stochastic Poisson systems. Int. J. Comput. Math. , 99(1):4–20, 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    D’Ambrosio, M

    R. D’Ambrosio, M. Moccaldi, and B. Paternoster. Numeri cal preservation of long-term dynamics by stochastic two-step methods. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 23(7):2763–2773, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    de la Cruz, J

    H. de la Cruz, J. C. Jimenez, and J. P. Zubelli. Locally li nearized methods for the simulation of stochastic oscillators driven by random forces. BIT, 57(1):123–151, 2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    K. D. Elworthy. Stochastic Differential Equations on Manifolds . London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 1982

    work page 1982

  35. [35]

    L. C. Evans. Partial differential equations , volume 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 201 0. 34 DA VID COHEN, BJ ¨ORN M ¨ULLER, AND ANDREA PAPINI

    work page

  36. [36]

    Fang and A

    Y. Fang and A. Waters. Dispersive estimates for Maxwell ’s equations in the exterior of a sphere. Journal of Differential Equations , 415:855–885, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Flanders

    H. Flanders. Differential forms with applications to the physical science s, volume 11. Courier Corporation, 1963

    work page 1963

  38. [38]

    Gy¨ ongy

    I. Gy¨ ongy. Stochastic partial differential equations on manifolds. I. Potential Anal. , 2(2):101–113, 1993

    work page 1993

  39. [39]

    Hiptmair

    R. Hiptmair. Finite elements in computational electro magnetism. Acta Numerica, 11:237–339, 2002

    work page 2002

  40. [40]

    J. Hong, R. Scherer, and L. Wang. Predictor-corrector m ethods for a linear stochastic oscillator with additive noise. Math. Comput. Modelling , 46(5-6):738–764, 2007

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Jansson, A

    E. Jansson, A. Lang, and M. Pereira. Non-stationary Gau ssian random fields on hypersurfaces: Sampling and strong error analysis, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Jiang, L

    S. Jiang, L. Wang, and J. Hong. Stochastic multi-symple ctic integrator for stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. Commun. Comput. Phys. , 14(2):393–411, 2013

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Kazashi and Q

    Y. Kazashi and Q. T. Le Gia. A non-uniform discretizatio n of stochastic heat equations with multiplicative noise on the unit sphere. J. Complexity , 50:43–65, 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen. Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations , volume 23 of Appli- cations of Mathematics (New York) . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992

    work page 1992

  45. [45]

    Lang and I

    A. Lang and I. Motschan-Armen. Euler-Maruyama approxi mations of the stochastic heat equation on the sphere. J. Comput. Dyn. , 11(1):23–42, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Lang and B

    A. Lang and B. M¨ uller. Isotropic Q-fractional Brownian motion on the sphere: regularity and f ast simu- lation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A , 383(2298):Paper No. 20240238, 13, 2025

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    A. Lang, A. Papini, and V. Schwarz. Approximation of the L´ evy-driven stochastic heat equation on the sphere, 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Lang and C

    A. Lang and C. Schwab. Isotropic Gaussian random fields o n the sphere: regularity, fast simulation and stochastic partial differential equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 25(6):3047–3094, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Q. T. Le Gia and J. Peach. A spectral method to the stochas tic Stokes equations on the sphere. In B. Lamichhane, T. Tran, and J. Bunder, editors, Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Computational Tech- niques and Applications Conference , CTAC-2018 , volume 60 of ANZIAM J. , pages C52–C64, June 2019

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    J. M. Lee. Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds , volume 176 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    G. J. Lord, C. E. Powell, and T. Shardlow. An introduction to computational stochastic PDEs . Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2014

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    C. Lubich. From Quantum to Classical Molecular Dynamics: Reduced Mode ls and Numerical Analysis , volume 12 of Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics . EMS Press, 1 edition, September 2008

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Malzoumati-Khiaban, A

    M. Malzoumati-Khiaban, A. Foroush Bastani, and M. R. Ya ghouti. Long-term adaptive symplectic nu- merical integration of linear stochastic oscillators driv en by additive white noise. Numer. Algorithms , 80(3):1059–1095, 2019

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Marinucci and G

    D. Marinucci and G. Peccati. Random Fields on the Sphere: Representation, Limit Theorem s and Cos- mological Applications. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambrid ge University Press, Cambridge, 2011

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Milani and R

    A. Milani and R. Picard. Decomposition theorems and their application to non-linea r electro- and magneto- static boundary value problems , pages 317–340. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heide lberg, 1988

    work page 1988

  56. [56]

    G. N. Milstein and M. V. Tretyakov. Stochastic numerics for mathematical physics . Scientific Computation. Springer, Cham, [2021] ©2021. Second edition [of 2069903]

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations

    Peter Monk. Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations . Oxford University Press, 04 2003

    work page 2003

  58. [58]

    Munshi and R

    S. Munshi and R. Yang. Complex solutions to Maxwell’s eq uations. Complex Analysis and its Synergies , 8(1), 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    S. Ohkuro. Differential Forms and Maxwell’s Field: An Ap plication of Harmonic Integrals. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 11(6):2005–2012, 06 1970

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    Peszat and J

    S. Peszat and J. Zabczyk. Stochastic Partial Differential Equations with L´ evy noise: An Evolution Equa- tion Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    J. M. Sanz-Serna and J. G. Verwer. Conerservative and No nconservative Schemes for the Solution of the Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 6(1):25–42, January 1986

    work page 1986

  62. [62]

    H. Schurz. A numerical method for nonlinear stochastic wave equations in R1. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. Ser. A Math. Anal. , 14(Advances in Dynamical Systems, suppl. S2):74–78, 2007 . LONG-TIME BEHA VIOR OF STOCHASTIC EVOLUTION EQUATIONS ON TH E SPHERE 35

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    H. Schurz. Analysis and discretization of semi-linear stochastic wave equations with cubic nonlinearity and additive space-time noise. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S , 1(2):353–363, 2008

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    H. Schurz. Stochastic wave equations with cubic nonlin earity and Q-regular additive noise in R2. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , (Dynamical systems, differential equations and applicati ons. 8th AIMS Conference. Suppl. Vol. II):1299–1308, 2011

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    M. J. Senosiain and A. Tocino. A review on numerical sche mes for solving a linear stochastic oscillator. BIT, 55(2):515–529, 2015

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    M. J. Senosiain and A. Tocino. On the numerical integrat ion of the undamped harmonic oscillator driven by independent additive gaussian white noises. Appl. Numer. Math. , 137:49–61, 2019

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    M. H. Stone. On One-Parameter Unitary Groups in Hilbert Space. Annals of Mathematics , 33(3):643–648, 1932

    work page 1932

  68. [68]

    R. S. Strichartz. Analysis of the Laplacian on the compl ete Riemannian manifold. Journal of Functional Analysis, 1983

    work page 1983

  69. [69]

    A. H. Strømmen Melbø and D. J. Higham. Numerical simulat ion of a linear stochastic oscillator with additive noise. Appl. Numer. Math. , 51(1):89–99, 2004

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    W. Su. On the peaks of a stochastic heat equation on a sphe re with a large radius. Electron. J. Probab. , 25:Paper No. 5, 38, 2020

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    J. Sun, C. Shu, and Y. Xing. Multi-symplectic discontin uous Galerkin methods for the stochastic Maxwell equations with additive noise. J. Comput. Phys. , 461:Paper No. 111199, 30, 2022

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    G. Szeg. Orthogonal polynomials, volume 23. American Mathematical Soc., 1939

    work page 1939

  73. [73]

    A. Tocino. On preserving long-time features of a linear stochastic oscillator. BIT, 47(1):189–196, 2007

    work page 2007

  74. [74]

    P. Wang, J. Hong, and D. Xu. Construction of symplectic R unge-Kutta methods for stochastic Hamilton- ian systems. Commun. Comput. Phys. , 21(1):237–270, 2017

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Y. Wang, Z. Lang, X. Yin, and Z. Zhao. Exponentially fitte d midpoint scheme for a stochastic oscillator. Mathematics, 14(1), 2026

    work page 2026

  76. [76]

    N. Weck. Maxwell’s boundary value problem on riemannia n manifolds with nonsmooth boundaries. Jour- nal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 46(2):410–437, 1974

    work page 1974

  77. [77]

    Weidmann

    J. Weidmann. Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces , volume 68 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer- Verlag, New York, 1980

    work page 1980

  78. [78]

    K. Yee. Numerical solution of initial boundary value pr oblems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , 14(3):302–307, 1966

    work page 1966

  79. [79]

    X. Yin, C. Zhang, and Y. Liu. Exponentially fitted trapez oidal scheme for a stochastic oscillator. J. Comput. Math. , 35(6):801–813, 2017

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    E ” ∥∇ S2uptq∥2 L2pS2;C3q ı “ E

    Y. Zhou and D. Liang. Modeling and FDTD discretization o f stochastic Maxwell’s equations with Drude dispersion. J. Comput. Phys. , 509:Paper No. 113033, 29, 2024. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden Email address : david.cohen@chalmers.se Department of Mathematical ...

    work page 2024