pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05864 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum optomechanics of lossy bodies: general approach and structured squeezed vacuum effects

Alessandro Ciattoni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum optomechanicssqueezed vacuumCasimir effectMaxwell stress tensorlossy objectsnon-equilibrium quantum statesquantum fluctuationsoptomechanical force
0
0 comments X

The pith

Illuminating lossy objects with anisotropic squeezed vacuum produces a purely quantum mechanical force from second-order field correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a general formalism based on the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism to calculate the time-averaged Maxwell stress tensor on a macroscopic lossy body when the medium-assisted field stays in local thermal equilibrium but the incoming scattering field can be in any mixed quantum state. It demonstrates that driving the scattering field with an anisotropic multimode squeezed vacuum shapes the spatial profile of electromagnetic quantum fluctuations so they lose rotational symmetry and generate a net mechanical force. This force exists even when the mean field is zero and depends on second-order correlations of the electric field rather than the square of the mean field that governs classical radiation pressure. The same expression recovers the standard Casimir force in full thermal equilibrium and classical radiation pressure under coherent illumination, and it applies directly to a homogeneous lossy sphere with realistic material parameters.

Core claim

Using the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism, the expectation value of the Maxwell stress tensor is obtained for a non-equilibrium setting in which the medium-assisted field is locally thermal while the scattering field is an arbitrary mixed state. When the scattering field is prepared as an anisotropic multimode squeezed vacuum, the resulting quantum fluctuations acquire a broken rotational symmetry that produces a net optomechanical force acting on the lossy object even though the mean field vanishes; the force is generated solely by second-order correlations.

What carries the argument

The Modified Langevin Noise Formalism applied to the Maxwell stress tensor, with the anisotropic multimode squeezed vacuum used to control the spatial structure of quantum fluctuations.

If this is right

  • The force expression recovers the fluctuation-dissipation relation for the Casimir effect when the entire system reaches thermal equilibrium.
  • Under coherent illumination the same expression reduces to ordinary classical radiation pressure.
  • The effect is experimentally accessible for a homogeneous lossy sphere using realistic material parameters and optical estimates.
  • The quantum force can be realized in regimes that avoid classical mean fields and shot noise while the object's macroscopic quantum coherence is preserved.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same formalism could be used to design illumination states that produce force profiles tailored to specific object shapes without introducing classical radiation-pressure noise.
  • Similar symmetry-breaking of fluctuations might be explored in other non-equilibrium quantum-optical settings involving lossy media, such as layered or composite bodies.
  • The approach suggests a route to optomechanical manipulation that separates quantum fluctuation forces from classical mean-field effects, potentially relevant for preserving coherence in larger objects.

Load-bearing premise

The medium-assisted field remains in local thermal equilibrium while the incoming scattering field is placed in an arbitrary mixed quantum state and the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism remains valid for this non-equilibrium macroscopic setting.

What would settle it

Observation or absence of a net force on a homogeneous lossy sphere illuminated by zero-mean anisotropic squeezed vacuum whose magnitude and direction match the second-order-correlation prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05864 by Alessandro Ciattoni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Radiation pressure cross-section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the overall optomechanical force experienced by a macroscopic lossy object in free space under external quantum illumination. To this end, utilizing the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism (MLNF), we derive the time-averaged expectation value of the Maxwell stress tensor for a non-equilibrium scenario in which the incoming scattering field is prepared in an arbitrary mixed quantum state, while the medium-assisted field is maintained in local thermal equilibrium. In the limit of full radiation-matter thermal equilibrium, our expression exactly recovers the well-known fluctuation-dissipation relation governing the Casimir effect, and, under coherent illumination, it yields the standard classical radiation pressure. We demonstrate that by driving the scattering field with an anisotropic, multimode squeezed vacuum state, the spatial profile of the electromagnetic quantum fluctuations can be engineered to exhibit broken rotational symmetry, thereby inducing a purely quantum mechanical force acting on the object. Such mechanical interaction is generated in the strict absence of a mean field, $\langle\hat{\mathbf{E}}\rangle=0$, and its non-classical nature is evidenced by its reliance on second-order field correlations $\langle\hat{\mathbf{E}}^2\rangle$, unlike classical optical radiation pressure governed by the squared mean field $\langle\hat{\mathbf{E}}\rangle^2$. Applying this exact formulation to a homogeneous lossy sphere, we demonstrate the experimental feasibility of the effect using realistic material parameters and optical estimations. Ultimately, we establish a general formalism for macroscopic quantum optomechanics that operates beyond the constraints of thermal equilibrium, enabling the prediction of regimes where the purely quantum force circumvents classical mean fields and shot noise while preserving the object's macroscopic quantum coherence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a general formalism based on the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism (MLNF) for the time-averaged Maxwell stress tensor experienced by a lossy macroscopic object in free space. The incoming scattering field is prepared in an arbitrary mixed quantum state while the medium-assisted field is kept in local thermal equilibrium. The resulting expression recovers the fluctuation-dissipation relation for the Casimir effect in full thermal equilibrium and the classical radiation-pressure formula under coherent illumination. The authors then show that driving the scattering field with an anisotropic multimode squeezed vacuum produces broken rotational symmetry in the quantum fluctuations, generating a net force on the object that depends on second-order correlations ⟨ʲ⟩ with vanishing mean field ⟨Ê⟩=0. The formalism is applied to a homogeneous lossy sphere to assess experimental feasibility with realistic parameters.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a concrete route to engineering purely quantum mechanical forces on macroscopic objects using structured non-classical illumination. This could enable optomechanical interactions that circumvent mean-field radiation pressure and classical shot noise while preserving macroscopic coherence, with possible relevance to precision metrology and quantum sensing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the time-averaged Maxwell stress tensor] The core derivation applies MLNF by assuming the medium-assisted field remains strictly thermal even when the incoming scattering field carries non-classical second-order correlations. The recovery of the equilibrium Casimir and coherent-drive limits does not test the regime in which absorption by the lossy object couples the two field sectors; an explicit argument or additional consistency check (e.g., showing that back-action on the medium-assisted noise remains negligible) is required for the non-equilibrium claim to be load-bearing.
  2. [Application to a homogeneous lossy sphere] In the sphere application, the net force is asserted to arise from the engineered anisotropy of ⟨ʲ⟩. The manuscript should supply the explicit angular integration or numerical values demonstrating that the force component is non-zero and distinguishable from residual thermal or classical contributions under the stated material parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the Maxwell stress tensor and the separation into medium-assisted versus scattering contributions should be introduced with a clear table or equation list to aid readability.
  2. A brief comparison with existing treatments of quantum radiation pressure on lossy bodies would help situate the novelty of the MLNF extension.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional justifications and explicit calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the time-averaged Maxwell stress tensor] The core derivation applies MLNF by assuming the medium-assisted field remains strictly thermal even when the incoming scattering field carries non-classical second-order correlations. The recovery of the equilibrium Casimir and coherent-drive limits does not test the regime in which absorption by the lossy object couples the two field sectors; an explicit argument or additional consistency check (e.g., showing that back-action on the medium-assisted noise remains negligible) is required for the non-equilibrium claim to be load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the non-equilibrium regime requires careful justification beyond the equilibrium limits. In the MLNF, the medium-assisted noise operators are defined locally via the imaginary part of the susceptibility and remain in thermal equilibrium by construction, decoupled from the external scattering field at the level of the second-order correlations used for the stress tensor. Absorption couples the sectors only through higher-order processes that are neglected in our perturbative treatment. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript providing this argument together with an order-of-magnitude estimate showing that back-action remains negligible for the weak-absorption and moderate-squeezing regime considered in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to a homogeneous lossy sphere] In the sphere application, the net force is asserted to arise from the engineered anisotropy of ⟨ʲ⟩. The manuscript should supply the explicit angular integration or numerical values demonstrating that the force component is non-zero and distinguishable from residual thermal or classical contributions under the stated material parameters.

    Authors: We accept that the sphere section would benefit from more explicit detail. The net force arises after performing the surface integral of the Maxwell stress tensor; the isotropic parts of ⟨ʲ⟩ cancel by symmetry upon angular integration over the sphere, while the anisotropic component aligned with the squeezing axis yields a nonzero contribution proportional to the squeezing parameter. We will include in the revision the key steps of this angular integration, together with numerical values of the resulting force for the stated parameters (lossy gold sphere, optical frequencies, squeezing strength r ≈ 1) and a direct comparison showing that the quantum force exceeds residual thermal fluctuations and any classical mean-field contributions by more than an order of magnitude. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses MLNF to obtain new force from input state correlations, recovers limits exactly

full rationale

The paper applies the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism (MLNF) to compute the time-averaged Maxwell stress tensor for a lossy object with arbitrary mixed incoming scattering field and thermal medium-assisted field. It exactly recovers the fluctuation-dissipation Casimir relation and classical radiation pressure in known limits without fitting. The claimed quantum force arises directly from second-order correlations of the engineered anisotropic squeezed vacuum state (with zero mean field), which is an external input rather than a fitted or redefined quantity. No self-definitional loops, no predictions that reduce to inputs by construction, and no load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent derivation. The formalism is presented as general and self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Modified Langevin Noise Formalism and the assumption that the medium-assisted field remains in local thermal equilibrium. No free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Modified Langevin Noise Formalism correctly describes the electromagnetic field in the presence of lossy media
    Invoked to derive the stress-tensor expectation value for non-equilibrium illumination.
  • domain assumption medium-assisted field remains in local thermal equilibrium while scattering field is in arbitrary mixed state
    Stated explicitly as the non-equilibrium scenario under which the force expression is derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1481 out tokens · 44075 ms · 2026-05-10T18:36:55.631906+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Contribution from the scattering sector To evaluate the scattering contribution to the force,F s, we utilize the asymptotic behavior of the modal dyadic Fω(r|n) as defined in Eq.(A2), together with the definition of the scattering dyadic kernelF ωs(r|n) in Eq.(A10). By substituting these asymptotic expressions into the first term ofM ωs in Eq.(C2), we obt...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Contribution from the medium-assisted sector To evaluate the medium-assisted contributionF em, rather than directly computing the asymptotic behavior of the kernelsG ων, it is highly advantageous to exploit the fundamental integral relation of Eq.(A9). By isolating the medium-assisted term, we can write X ν Z d3sG ων (r|s)· G T∗ ων (r ′|s) = ℏk2 ω πε0 Im ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch.51, 793 (1948)

    work page 1948

  4. [4]

    E. M. Lifshitz, The Theory of Molecular Attractive Forces between Solids, Sov. Phys. JETP2, 73 (1956)

    work page 1956

  5. [5]

    S. M. Rytov, Y. A. Kravtsov, and V. I. Tatarskii,Principles of Statistical Radiophysics 3: Elements of Random Fields (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Gruner and D

    T. Gruner and D. G. Welsch, Green-function approach to the radiation-field quantization for homogeneous and inhomo- geneous Kramers-Kronig dielectrics, Phys. Rev. A53, 1818-1829 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Gruner and D.-G

    T. Gruner and D.-G. Welsch, Quantum-optical input-output relations for dispersive and lossy multilayer dielectric plates, Phys. Rev. A54, 1661 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Scheel, L

    S. Scheel, L. Kn¨ oll, and D. G. Welsch QED commutation relations for inhomogeneous Kramers-Kronig dielectrics, Phys. Rev. A58, 700-706 (1998). 20

    work page 1998

  9. [9]

    H. T. Dung, L. Kn¨ oll, and D. G. Welsch, Three-dimensional quantization of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorbing inhomogeneous dielectrics, Phys. Rev. A57, 3931-3942 (1998)

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Scheel and S

    S. Scheel and S. Y. Buhmann, Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics-concepts and applications, Acta Phys. Slovaca58, 675 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    T. G. Philbin, Casimir effect from macroscopic quantum electrodynamics, New J. Phys.13, 063026 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    S. Y. Buhmann,Dispersion Forces I: Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics and Ground-State Casimir, Casimir-Polder and van der Waals Forces, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Gruner and D.G

    T. Gruner and D.G. Welsch, Quantum-optical input-output relations for dispersive and lossy multilayer dielectric plates, Phys. Rev. A54, 1661 (1996)

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    Kn¨ oll, S

    L. Kn¨ oll, S. Scheel, E. Schmidt, D. G. Welsch, and A. V. Chizhov, Quantum-state transformation by dispersive and absorbing four-port devices, Phys. Rev. A59, 4717 (1999)

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Antezza, L

    M. Antezza, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, New Asymptotic Behavior of the Surface-Atom Force out of Thermal Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 113202 (2005)

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Kr¨ uger, T

    M. Kr¨ uger, T. Emig, and M. Kardar, Nonequilibrium Electromagnetic Fluctuations: Heat Transfer and Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 210404 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Messina and M

    R. Messina and M. Antezza, Scattering-matrix approach to Casimir-Lifshitz force and heat transfer out of thermal equi- librium between arbitrary bodies, Phys. Rev. A84, 042102 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Antezza, L

    M. Antezza, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, and V. B. Svetovoy, Casimir-Lifshitz force out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. A77, 022901 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Bimonte, Scattering approach to Casimir forces and radiative heat transfer for nanostructured surfaces out of thermal equilibrium, Phys

    G. Bimonte, Scattering approach to Casimir forces and radiative heat transfer for nanostructured surfaces out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. A80, 042102 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala, Cavity Optomechanics: Back-Action at the Mesoscale Science321, 1172 (2008)

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Meystre, A short walk through quantum optomechanics, Ann

    P. Meystre, A short walk through quantum optomechanics, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)525, 215 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Genes, D

    C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, S. Gigan, and M. Aspelmeyer, Ground-state cooling of a micromechanical oscillator: Comparing cold damping and cavity-assisted cooling schemes, Phys. Rev. A77, 033804 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. P. Chen, A. A. Clerk, and S. M. Girvin, Quantum Theory of Cavity-Assisted Sideband Cooling of Mechanical Motion Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 093902 (2007)

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    C. K. Law, Interaction between a moving mirror and radiation pressure: A Hamiltonian formulation, Phys. Rev. A51, 2537 (1995)

    work page 1995

  26. [26]

    Fabre, M

    C. Fabre, M. Pinard, S. Bourzeix, A. Heidmann, E. Giacobino, and S. Reynaud, Quantum-noise reduction using a cavity with a movable mirror, Phys. Rev. A49, 1337 (1994)

    work page 1994

  27. [27]

    Mancini and P

    S. Mancini and P. Tombesi, Quantum noise reduction by radiation pressure Phys. Rev. A49, 4055 (1994)

    work page 1994

  28. [28]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. D23, 1693 (1981)

    work page 1981

  29. [29]

    J. B. Clark, F. Lecocq, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Sideband cooling beyond the quantum backaction limit with squeezed light, Nature541, 191 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Tseet al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Phys

    M. Tseet al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 231107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, Florian Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Joos, and H

    E. Joos, and H. D. Zeh, The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment, Z. Phys. B59, 223 (1985)

    work page 1985

  33. [33]

    Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007)

    M. Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Romero-Isart et al

    O. Romero-Isart et al. Large Quantum Superpositions and Interference of Massive Nanometer-Sized Objects, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 020405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Di Stefano, S

    O. Di Stefano, S. Savasta and R. Girlanda, Mode expansion and photon operators in dispersive and absorbing dielectrics, J. Mod. Opt.48, 67-84 (2001)

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    Drezet, Quantizing polaritons in inhomogeneous dissipative systems, Phys

    A. Drezet, Quantizing polaritons in inhomogeneous dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. A95, 023831 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Dorier, J

    V. Dorier, J. Lampart, S. Gu´ erin, and H. R. Jauslin, Canonical quantization for quantum plasmonics with finite nanos- tructures, Phys. Rev. A100, 042111 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    D. Y. Na, T. E. Roth , J. Zhu, W. C. Chew and C. J. Ryu, Numerical framework for modeling quantum electromagnetic systems involving finite-sized lossy dielectric objects in free space, Phys. Rev. A107, 063702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Ciattoni, Quantum electrodynamics of lossy magnetodielectric samples in vacuum: Modified Langevin noise formalism, Phys

    A. Ciattoni, Quantum electrodynamics of lossy magnetodielectric samples in vacuum: Modified Langevin noise formalism, Phys. Rev. A110, 013707 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    A. Ciattoni, Direct derivation of the modified Langevin noise formalism from the canonical quantization of macroscopic electromagnetism, arXiv:2603.04336v1, submitted for publication on New Journal of Physics

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Miano, L

    G. Miano, L. M. Cangemi and C. Forestiere, Quantum emitter interacting with a dispersive dielectric object: a model based on the modified Langevin noise formalism, Nanophotonics, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0703

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2024-0703 2025

  42. [42]

    Miano, L

    G. Miano, L. M. Cangemi and C. Forestiere, Spectral densities of a dispersive dielectric sphere in the modified Langevin noise formalism, Phys. Rev. A112, 033712 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Miano, L

    G. Miano, L. M. Cangemi and C. Forestiere, Modified Langevin noise formalism for multiple quantum emitters in dispersive electromagnetic environments out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. A113, 023720 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    T. G. Philbin, Canonical quantization of macroscopic electromagnetism, New J. Phys.12, 123008 (2010). 21

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Ciattoni, Quantum-optical scattering by macroscopic lossy objects: A general approach, Phys

    A. Ciattoni, Quantum-optical scattering by macroscopic lossy objects: A general approach, Phys. Rev. A112, 013704 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Ciattoni, Quantum interference effects in two-photon scattering by a macroscopic lossy sphere, arXiv:2510.27612v1, submitted for publication on Physical Review A

    A. Ciattoni, Quantum interference effects in two-photon scattering by a macroscopic lossy sphere, arXiv:2510.27612v1, submitted for publication on Physical Review A

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    R. J. Glauber and M. Lewenstein, Quantum optics of dielectric media, Phys. Rev. A43, 467 (1991)

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    Kashiwazakiet al., Continuous-wave 6-dB-squeezed light with 2.5-THz-bandwidth from single-mode PPLN waveguide, APL Photonics5, 036104 (2020)

    T. Kashiwazakiet al., Continuous-wave 6-dB-squeezed light with 2.5-THz-bandwidth from single-mode PPLN waveguide, APL Photonics5, 036104 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Fenollosa, F

    R. Fenollosa, F. Ramiro-Manzano, M. Garin, and R. Alcubilla, Thermal Emission of Silicon at Near-Infrared Frequencies Mediated by Mie Resonances, ACS Photonics6, 3174 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Kristensson, Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves by Obstacles, Scitech Publishing, New York (2016)

    G. Kristensson, Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves by Obstacles, Scitech Publishing, New York (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principle of Optics, Cambridge University Press (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman,Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles(Wiley, New York, 1983)

    work page 1983