pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05918 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.flu-dyn

Long distance attraction between particles in a soap film

Youna Louyer , Megan Delens , Nicolas Vandewalle , Benjamin Dollet , Isabelle Cantat , Ana\"is Gauthier This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn
keywords soap filmCheerios effectnon-reciprocal forcesinterface deformationlong-range attractionparticle dynamicsboundary conditions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Particles in a soap film attract each other with forces that differ in strength and direction from the reverse pull.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that millimeter-sized particles trapped in a horizontal soap film attract each other through deformations of the liquid-air interface caused by their weight. Because each particle's deformation extends over the full size of the film, the resulting attraction is extremely long-ranged and depends on each particle's absolute position relative to the frame. Unlike ordinary forces, the interaction is non-reciprocal: the force one particle exerts on the other differs in both magnitude and direction from the force it experiences back, with the mismatch reaching 150 percent in asymmetric placements. This position dependence produces complex orbiting paths that last several seconds before the particles collide. The findings illustrate how boundary conditions alone can break the usual symmetry of effective interactions in a confined fluid.

Core claim

The central claim is that the attractive force between two particles in a soap film is non-reciprocal because the interface deformation induced by each particle depends on its position in the film. The force exerted by one particle on the other differs both in direction and magnitude from the reverse interaction, with an asymmetry reaching 150 percent when one particle is close to the center and the other close to the frame. Reciprocity is recovered when both particles are close to the film center. These results follow from the long-ranged deformation that spans the entire system size combined with low viscous friction.

What carries the argument

The position-dependent deformation of the soap-film interface by each particle's weight, which sets the local slope and thereby the horizontal force on the second particle.

If this is right

  • The long-ranged attraction produces intricate particle orbits lasting up to ten seconds before collision.
  • Force asymmetry reaches 150 percent for one particle near the center and the other near the frame.
  • Reciprocity holds when both particles lie close to the film center.
  • Low viscous friction allows the non-reciprocal dynamics to persist until the particles meet.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same position-dependent deformation mechanism may appear in other thin liquid layers or membranes where boundaries shape the interface.
  • Non-reciprocal capillary forces could be used to steer particle assembly or transport in confined geometries without external fields.
  • Varying film size or particle mass would test how strongly boundary proximity controls the size of the asymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The deformation of the film due to one particle's weight extends over the entire system and changes with the particle's distance from the boundaries.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the mutual forces at fixed positions, checking whether the action-reaction pair is always equal in magnitude and opposite in direction or whether systematic asymmetry appears precisely when one particle is near the center and the other near the frame.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05918 by Ana\"is Gauthier, Benjamin Dollet, Isabelle Cantat, Megan Delens, Nicolas Vandewalle, Youna Louyer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: c evidences the two trajectories for t > 0; the color code indicates the particles velocities, which range between 0 cm/s (purple) and 9 cm/s (yellow). Despite the large distance d ≫ R between the particles, espe￾cially at small time, the attraction of particle 2 is able to significantly move particle 1 away from its equilibrium position at the film center. The trajectories that follow form a pattern which… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: compiles all measurements of the interaction force F2→1, both obtained dynamically (filled circles) and using the magnetic actuation of the particles (empty dia￾monds). For each experiment, the legend gives the radius R of the particles (left: particle 1 and right: particle 2) and their density ρ (gray scale). Note that the masses of the moving objects differ from the masses of the central spheres due to t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Millimeter-sized particles trapped at the surface of a liquid bath attract each other through the deformation of the liquid-air interface, a phenomenon known as "the Cheerios effect". We consider here a situation similar at first sight: the interaction between two millimeter-sized particles trapped in an horizontal soap film. In this geometry, the deformation of the film due to the weight of one particle extends over the entire system size, which induces an extremely long-ranged attraction. Combined with the low viscous friction in the film, this leads to intricate particle orbits, lasting up to ten seconds before the two particles eventually collide. By tracking the particles dynamics, we measure the force exerted by each particle on the other, and we develop a theoretical model. Because the interface deformation induced by a particle depends on its position in the soap film, the attractive force has two features that fundamentally depart from classical interaction forces. The force exerted by one particle on the other differs both in direction and magnitude from the reverse interaction, with an asymmetry reaching 150% when one particle is close to the center and the other one close to the frame. Reciprocity is recovered when both particles are close to the film center. These results are a original example of non-reciprocal effective interactions due to boundary conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental tracking of millimeter-sized particles in a horizontal soap film, revealing long-range attractive forces arising from interface deformation that spans the system size under fixed frame boundaries. From trajectories, the authors extract forces showing non-reciprocal behavior: the force from particle A on B differs in magnitude and direction from the reverse, with asymmetry up to 150% when one particle is near the center and the other near the frame. A model based on the harmonic (Laplace) solution for film height with position-dependent Green's function is developed to explain the observations, recovering reciprocity near the center. The work positions this as an example of boundary-condition-induced non-reciprocal effective interactions.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing methodological details, this constitutes a clean experimental demonstration of non-reciprocal effective forces emerging purely from the absolute-position dependence of the deformation field in a 2D tension-dominated system. The long-range character follows directly from the 2D Green's function under Dirichlet boundaries, and the reported asymmetry is a natural consequence rather than an ad-hoc addition. Trajectory-based force inference combined with a minimal model offers a reproducible platform for studying confined interfacial interactions, with potential relevance to soft-matter assembly and non-reciprocal dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental force measurement section] Force extraction from trajectories: no error bars, data exclusion criteria, or explicit account of how the viscous drag coefficient is calibrated or held constant across positions are provided. Without these, the quantitative 150% asymmetry cannot be assessed for robustness against measurement noise or systematic bias.
  2. [Theoretical model and validation] Model-data comparison: the theoretical model is stated to explain the measured trajectories, yet no quantitative metrics (residuals, chi-squared values, or direct overlay statistics) are reported. This leaves open whether the position-dependent deformation fully accounts for the data or requires additional fitting parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and captions] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state how asymmetry is quantified (e.g., ratio of force magnitudes at specific positions) to allow readers to verify the 150% figure directly from the plots.
  2. [Methods] The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement on film-thickness uniformity and any controls performed to confirm the tension-dominated regime (i.e., negligible gravity or bending effects).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and quantitative comparisons as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental force measurement section] Force extraction from trajectories: no error bars, data exclusion criteria, or explicit account of how the viscous drag coefficient is calibrated or held constant across positions are provided. Without these, the quantitative 150% asymmetry cannot be assessed for robustness against measurement noise or systematic bias.

    Authors: We agree that the original submission omitted explicit documentation of these aspects. In the revised manuscript we now report error bars on all extracted forces, computed as the standard deviation across at least five independent trajectory realizations for each pair of initial positions. Data exclusion criteria are stated explicitly: trajectories are retained only if the particles remain at least 2 mm from the frame boundaries and show no detectable out-of-plane motion (verified by auxiliary side-view imaging). The viscous drag coefficient is calibrated from the long-time diffusive motion of single particles at five representative locations spanning the film; these measurements establish that the coefficient varies by less than 8 % across the domain, consistent with the uniform film thickness. With these additions the reported 150 % asymmetry remains well outside the combined experimental uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theoretical model and validation] Model-data comparison: the theoretical model is stated to explain the measured trajectories, yet no quantitative metrics (residuals, chi-squared values, or direct overlay statistics) are reported. This leaves open whether the position-dependent deformation fully accounts for the data or requires additional fitting parameters.

    Authors: We accept that quantitative validation metrics were absent. The revised manuscript includes overlaid experimental and model trajectories for four representative initial configurations, together with the root-mean-square deviation between observed and predicted particle positions (typically 0.3–0.5 mm, comparable to the particle radius and tracking precision). No adjustable parameters are introduced beyond the independently measured particle weights and film tension; the interface height is obtained directly from the position-dependent Green’s function satisfying the Dirichlet boundary conditions. The residuals are statistically consistent with the measured noise level, confirming that the boundary-constrained deformation accounts for the data without supplementary fitting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on direct experimental tracking of particle trajectories in a soap film to extract forces, followed by a model based on the standard 2D Laplace equation for meniscus deformation (∇²η = 0) subject to fixed boundary conditions at the frame. The resulting position-dependent, non-reciprocal forces emerge as a direct mathematical consequence of the Green's function for this boundary-value problem and do not reduce to any fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction. No ansatz is smuggled in, no uniqueness theorem is invoked from prior author work, and the asymmetry (including the 150% figure) is presented as a predicted outcome of the mechanics rather than an input. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of 2D tension-dominated interface physics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The model presumably rests on standard thin-film hydrodynamics and interface tension assumptions whose details are unavailable here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5542 in / 1324 out tokens · 163418 ms · 2026-05-10T18:34:53.780856+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Here,r 1 remains relatively small at all times, and the forceF 2→1 follows the 1/dscaling up tod= 3 cm

    The experimental data is scattered at small timest (corresponding the larger distancesd), which we explain by vertical oscillations of particle 2 in the film in the first seconds after its deposition, that temporarily impact the horizontal force balance (equation 1). Here,r 1 remains relatively small at all times, and the forceF 2→1 follows the 1/dscaling...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The interaction between floating particles

    MM Nicolson. The interaction between floating particles. InMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosoph- ical Society, volume 45, pages 288–295. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1949

    work page 1949

  3. [3]

    The cheerios effect

    Dominic Vella and L Mahadevan. The cheerios effect. American journal of physics, 73(9):817–825, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Capillary interactions between anisotropic colloidal particles.Physical review letters, 94(1):018301, 2005

    Jean-Christophe Loudet, Ahmed M Alsayed, Jian Zhang, and Arjun G Yodh. Capillary interactions between anisotropic colloidal particles.Physical review letters, 94(1):018301, 2005

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Capillary interception of floating particles by surface-piercing vegetation.Physical review letters, 111(16):164501, 2013

    Paolo Peruzzo, Andrea Defina, Heidi M Nepf, and Ro- man Stocker. Capillary interception of floating particles by surface-piercing vegetation.Physical review letters, 111(16):164501, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    3d-printed spines for programmable liquid topographies and micromanipulation.Nature Communications, 16(1):4348, 2025

    Megan Delens, Axel Franckart, Daniel M Harris, and Nicolas Vandewalle. 3d-printed spines for programmable liquid topographies and micromanipulation.Nature Communications, 16(1):4348, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Self-assembly of mesoscale ob- jects into ordered two-dimensional arrays.Science, 276(5310):233–235, 1997

    Ned Bowden, Andreas Terfort, Jeff Carbeck, and George M Whitesides. Self-assembly of mesoscale ob- jects into ordered two-dimensional arrays.Science, 276(5310):233–235, 1997

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    The collective motion of nematodes in a thin liquid layer.Soft Matter, 7(6):2444–2448, 2011

    Sean Gart, Dominic Vella, and Sunghwan Jung. The collective motion of nematodes in a thin liquid layer.Soft Matter, 7(6):2444–2448, 2011

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Capillary assembly of colloids: Interactions on planar and curved interfaces.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 9(1):283–305, 2018

    Iris B Liu, Nima Sharifi-Mood, and Kathleen J Stebe. Capillary assembly of colloids: Interactions on planar and curved interfaces.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 9(1):283–305, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Small fire ant rafts are unstable.Physical Review Fluids, 7(9):090501, 2022

    Hungtang Ko, Mathias Hadgu, Keyana Komilian, and David L Hu. Small fire ant rafts are unstable.Physical Review Fluids, 7(9):090501, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Interactions and pattern formation in a macro- scopic magnetocapillary salr system of mermaid cereal

    Alireza Hooshanginejad, Jack-William Barotta, Victoria Spradlin, Giuseppe Pucci, Robert Hunt, and Daniel M Harris. Interactions and pattern formation in a macro- scopic magnetocapillary salr system of mermaid cereal. Nature Communications, 15(1):5466, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Two-dimensional interfacial colloidal crystals.Physical review letters, 45(7):569, 1980

    Pawel Pieranski. Two-dimensional interfacial colloidal crystals.Physical review letters, 45(7):569, 1980

    work page 1980

  13. [13]

    Pleats in crystals on curved surfaces.Nature, 468(7326):947–951, 2010

    William TM Irvine, Vincenzo Vitelli, and Paul M Chaikin. Pleats in crystals on curved surfaces.Nature, 468(7326):947–951, 2010

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Micro- and nanoparticles self-assembly for virtually defect-free, adjustable monolayers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10):3711–3714, 2008

    N Aubry, P Singh, M Janjua, and S Nudurupati. Micro- and nanoparticles self-assembly for virtually defect-free, adjustable monolayers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10):3711–3714, 2008

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Switchable self-assembled capillary structures.Soft Mat- ter, 16(45):10320–10325, 2020

    Nicolas Vandewalle, Martin Poty, Nathan Vanesse, Jeremie Caprasse, Thomas Defize, and Christine Jerome. Switchable self-assembled capillary structures.Soft Mat- ter, 16(45):10320–10325, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Capillary forces and structuring in layers of colloid particles.Cur- rent opinion in colloid and interface science, 6(4):383– 401, 2001

    Peter A Kralchevsky and Nikolai D Denkov. Capillary forces and structuring in layers of colloid particles.Cur- rent opinion in colloid and interface science, 6(4):383– 401, 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    Force balance of particles trapped at fluid interfaces

    Alvaro Dominguez, Martin Oettel, and Siegfried Diet- rich. Force balance of particles trapped at fluid interfaces. The Journal of chemical physics, 128(11), 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Mea- surement of the force between uncharged colloidal parti- cles trapped at a flat air - water interface.Soft Matter, 15(29):5815–5818, 2019

    Virginia Carrasco-Fadanelli and Rolando Castillo. Mea- surement of the force between uncharged colloidal parti- cles trapped at a flat air - water interface.Soft Matter, 15(29):5815–5818, 2019

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Di- rect measurement of capillary attraction between floating disks.Physical Review Letters, 123(25):254502, 2019

    Ian Ho, Giuseppe Pucci, and Daniel M Harris. Di- rect measurement of capillary attraction between floating disks.Physical Review Letters, 123(25):254502, 2019

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Induced capillary dipoles in floating particle assemblies

    Megan Delens, Ylona Collard, and Nicolas Vandewalle. Induced capillary dipoles in floating particle assemblies. Physical Review Fluids, 8(7):074001, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Energy absorption in a bamboo foam.Europhys

    A Le Goff, L Courbin, Howard A Stone, and D Quere. Energy absorption in a bamboo foam.Europhys. Lett, 84(3):36001, 2008

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    The fluid trampo- line: droplets bouncing on a soap film.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 625:167–203, 2009

    Tristan Gilet and John WM Bush. The fluid trampo- line: droplets bouncing on a soap film.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 625:167–203, 2009

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Free-standing liquid membranes as unusual particle sep- arators.Science advances, 4(8):eaat3276, 2018

    Birgitt Boschitsch Stogin, Luke Gockowski, Hannah Feld- stein, Houston Claure, Jing Wang, and Tak-Sing Wong. Free-standing liquid membranes as unusual particle sep- arators.Science advances, 4(8):eaat3276, 2018

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Sliding dynamics of a particle in a soap film.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1007:R8, 2025

    Youna Louyer, Benjamin Dollet, Isabelle Cantat, and Anais Gauthier. Sliding dynamics of a particle in a soap film.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1007:R8, 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Orbiting, colliding and merging liquid lenses on a soap film: Toward gravitational analogues

    Jean-Paul Martischang, Benjamin Reichert, Ilies Haouche, Germain Rousseaux, Alexis Duchesne, and Michael Baudoin. Orbiting, colliding and merging liquid lenses on a soap film: Toward gravitational analogues. PNAS Nexus, page pgag079, 03 2026

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Spontaneous particle ordering, sorting, and assembly on soap films.Nano Letters, 24(21):6433–6440, 2024

    Yang Shi, Danning Wang, Yuqing Xiao, Ting Pan, Wen- peng Liu, Luke P Lee, Hongbao Xin, and Baojun Li. Spontaneous particle ordering, sorting, and assembly on soap films.Nano Letters, 24(21):6433–6440, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Very-long-range nature of capillary interactions in liquid films.Physical review letters, 100(10):106103, 2008

    Roberto Di Leonardo, F Saglimbeni, and Giancarlo Ruocco. Very-long-range nature of capillary interactions in liquid films.Physical review letters, 100(10):106103, 2008

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Pendular rings between solids: meniscus properties and capillary force

    FM Orr, LE Scriven, and Ay P Rivas. Pendular rings between solids: meniscus properties and capillary force. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 67(4):723–742, 1975

    work page 1975

  29. [29]

    Marginal pinching in soap films.Europhysics Letters, 55(6):834, 2001

    Achod Aradian, Elie Raphael, and P-G De Gennes. Marginal pinching in soap films.Europhysics Letters, 55(6):834, 2001

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Onset of thin film meniscus along a fibre.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 865:650–680, 2019

    Shuo Guo, Xianmin Xu, Tiezheng Qian, Yana Di, Masao Doi, and Penger Tong. Onset of thin film meniscus along a fibre.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 865:650–680, 2019

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Capillary forces between spherical particles floating at a liquid- liquid interface.Langmuir, 21(24):11190–11200, 2005

    Nikolina D Vassileva, Dirk van den Ende, Frieder Mugele, and Jorrit Mellema. Capillary forces between spherical particles floating at a liquid- liquid interface.Langmuir, 21(24):11190–11200, 2005

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Aggregation of frictional particles due to capillary attraction.Physical Review E, 83(5):051403, 2011

    Marie-Julie Dalbe, Darija Cosic, Michael Berhanu, and Arshad Kudrolli. Aggregation of frictional particles due to capillary attraction.Physical Review E, 83(5):051403, 2011

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Capillary orbits.Nature communications, 10(1):3947, 2019

    Anais Gauthier, Devaraj van Der Meer, Jacco H Snoei- jer, and Guillaume Lajoinie. Capillary orbits.Nature communications, 10(1):3947, 2019. 8

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    On the shape of giant soap bubbles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(10):2515–2519, 2017

    Caroline Cohen, Baptiste Darbois Texier, Etienne Reyssat, Jacco H Snoeijer, David Qu´ er´ e, and Christophe Clanet. On the shape of giant soap bubbles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(10):2515–2519, 2017

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Orbiting, colliding and merging droplets on a soap film: toward gravitational analogues.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08331, 2025

    Jean-Paul Martischang, Benjamin Reichert, Germain Rousseaux, Alexis Duchesne, and Michael Baudoin. Orbiting, colliding and merging droplets on a soap film: toward gravitational analogues.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08331, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Statics and dynamics of magnetocapillary bonds

    Guillaume Lagubeau, Galien Grosjean, Alexis Darras, Geoffroy Lumay, Maxime Hubert, and Nicolas Vande- walle. Statics and dynamics of magnetocapillary bonds. Physical Review E, 93(5):053117, 2016

    work page 2016