pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06142 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Light-Induced Quantum Self-Trapping of Vibrational Excitons in an Optical Cavity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum self-trappingvibrational excitonsoptical cavityTavis-Cummings modellight-matter couplingenergy localizationvibronsanharmonic modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

An optical cavity can induce stabilized quantum self-trapping in vibrational excitons by freezing their energy exchange at critical coupling strengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how coupling two anharmonic vibrational modes to a single cavity photon changes the energy transfer that would otherwise occur slowly between the modes. Without the cavity, symmetry blocks complete localization and energy continues to flow, albeit reduced by interactions. The cavity opens extra transition pathways whose interference first suppresses transfer at weak couplings and then accelerates it at stronger couplings. Critical values of the coupling strength mark points where transfer nearly halts, pointing to a light-induced form of quantum self-trapping for many-vibron states that persists indefinitely in the model. Readers would care because the result offers a light-based handle on energy localization in molecular quantum systems.

Core claim

In the generalized Tavis-Cummings model for two anharmonic vibrational modes plus one cavity mode, the dynamics split into two regimes separated by critical light-matter coupling strengths. At weak coupling, destructive interference between newly available pathways suppresses energy exchange and enhances self-trapping. At higher coupling the interference pattern shifts to speed up vibrational energy flow. At the critical points themselves the transfer almost totally freezes, indicating the emergence of a stabilized light-induced quantum self-trapping of many-vibron bound states.

What carries the argument

The generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian for two anharmonic vibrational modes interacting with one cavity photon mode, which adds transition pathways whose interference controls the rate of vibron energy transfer.

If this is right

  • Cavity coupling can switch the system between enhanced self-trapping and accelerated energy transfer depending on the strength.
  • At critical coupling strengths the vibrational energy localization acquires near-infinite lifetime in the model.
  • Many-vibron bound states become stabilized by the light-matter interaction in ways impossible without the cavity.
  • Optical cavities provide a controllable route to energy localization in quantum molecular systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interference mechanism might extend to systems with more than two modes if analogous pathways remain available.
  • Time-domain experiments that scan cavity coupling while tracking vibrational populations could directly map the predicted freezing points.
  • Realistic decoherence would likely soften the perfect freeze but could still leave measurable windows of enhanced localization.
  • The approach may link to polariton chemistry, where cavities alter reaction paths by favoring localized over delocalized vibrational states.

Load-bearing premise

The simplified model of exactly two anharmonic modes plus one cavity mode, without decoherence, dissipation, or extra vibrational modes, accurately captures the real dynamics and lets the reported interference effects persist.

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurements of the population in each vibrational mode that show near-zero net energy transfer persisting over long times exactly at the predicted critical coupling strengths would support the claim; continued transfer at those couplings would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06142 by Saad Yalouz, Vincent Pouthier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Anharmonic Quantum Dimer in an optical cavity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the quantum self-trapping phe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: G dependence of the time evolution of the vibron population imbalance for NB = 3, J = 1, A = 4 and ω = ω0. The red curve defines the smoothed vibron population imbalance. It is numerically constructed by restricting the expansion of the evolution operator over the two lowest energy levels (see Eq.(7)). behavior arises. Although the energy does not localize, it takes an extremely long time to propagate from… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: G dependence of the limiting probabilities for NB = 3, J = 1, A = 4 and ω = ω0. The survival proba￾bility πS (black curve) is defined as the probability of find￾ing the system in its initial state |0, 3, 0⟩. The target proba￾bility πT (red curve) corresponds to the probability of find￾ing the system in the target state |0, 0, 3⟩. Finally, π2 (blue curve) denotes the probability of occupying states with ene… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two-dimensional representation of the limiting probabilities on the triangular network ¯π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) G dependence of the polaritonic energy spectrum. (b) Dashed lines correspond to G dependence of the energy spectrum of the four level model (see Sec. IV). Black and red full lines define the two lowest energy level of the polaritonic energy spectrum extracted form numerical calculations. (c) G dependence of the gap between the two lowest energy level form numerical calculation (black full line) and fro… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A dependence of the critical coupling Gc for J = 1, ω = ω0, NB = 3 (black curve) and NB = 5 (red curve). Cicr￾les characterize the empirical law Gc = p J 2 + (NB − 1)AJ. the anharmonicity through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Four-level model introduced in Sec. IV to capture the physics of the NQD in the cavity. It repre￾sents the active subspace formed by combining the two￾level system spanned by the states |1g⟩ = |0, NB, 0⟩ and |2g⟩ = |0, 0, NB⟩ and the two-level system spanned by the states |1e⟩ = |1, NB − 1, 0⟩ and |2e⟩ = |1, 0, NB − 1⟩. (b) Il￾lustration of the couplings between the symmetric states and between the ant… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Time evolution of the vibron population imbalance ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In an optical cavity, strong light--matter coupling between excitons and photons has been widely reported as a way to enhance energy delocalization through spatially extended polaritonic states. In contrast, leveraging cavity-mediated light--matter effects to promote the reciprocal phenomenon, namely \textit{energy localization}, remains largely underexplored. In the present work, we address this question by focusing on a special form of energy localization arising from nonlinear matter interactions: \textit{Quantum Self-Trapping} (QST). We employ a generalized Tavis--Cummings model to investigate the transport of vibrational excitons -- \textit{i.e., vibrons} -- between two anharmonic vibrational modes and examine their interplay with cavity photons. In the absence of a cavity, the arising of true and complete QST -- \textit{i.e.}, an infinite-lifetime localization -- is not possible due to the symmetry of the system. The energy transfer between the two modes still occurs, slowed down by the many-body interactions. Coupling the system to a single-mode cavity strongly alters this behavior, with two emerging regimes. First, at weak light--matter coupling, destructive interference between newly opened transition pathways suppresses energy exchange, leading to cavity-enhanced self-trapping. As the coupling strength increases, these interference effects evolve leading to cavity-assisted energy transfer, where we observe an acceleration of the vibrational energy flow. Most notably, we identify critical coupling strengths that separate both regimes in which the dynamics almost totally freeze, suggesting the arising of a ``stabilized'' light-induced~QST of many-vibron bound states. These results suggest that optical cavities can not only enhance transport but could also stabilize energy localization phenomena, providing a new route to control energy flow in quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that coupling two anharmonic vibrational modes to a single-mode optical cavity via a generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian enables light-induced quantum self-trapping (QST) of vibrons. Without the cavity, symmetry prevents true infinite-lifetime localization. With the cavity, weak light-matter coupling produces destructive interference that suppresses energy exchange (cavity-enhanced self-trapping), while stronger coupling accelerates transfer; critical coupling values are identified at which the dynamics nearly freeze, indicating stabilized QST of many-vibron bound states.

Significance. If the interference-based freezing at critical couplings holds under the model's assumptions, the work would usefully complement the literature on cavity-enhanced delocalization by showing how cavities can instead stabilize localization through pathway interference. The identification of tunable regimes separating suppressed and accelerated transport offers a concrete, falsifiable prediction for vibrational polariton experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical Model] The manuscript invokes a generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian for two anharmonic modes plus one cavity mode but supplies neither the explicit operator form nor the values of the free parameters (light-matter coupling and anharmonicity) used to locate the critical points; without these, the reported freezing cannot be reproduced or checked against limiting cases.
  2. [Results on Critical Couplings] The central claim of 'almost totally freeze' dynamics at critical couplings rests on exact destructive interference within a closed, three-mode unitary evolution; the text provides no analysis of how additional vibrational modes, cavity leakage, or weak bath couplings would lift the degeneracy and restore finite transfer rates on relevant timescales.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'many-vibron bound states' while the model contains only two vibrational modes; a brief clarification of how the bound-state character emerges from the two-mode dynamics would aid readability.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the light-matter coupling strength and anharmonicity parameter is introduced without an early dedicated definitions paragraph, making the regime boundaries harder to track.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the potential significance of light-induced quantum self-trapping and the identification of tunable regimes. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Theoretical Model] The manuscript invokes a generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian for two anharmonic modes plus one cavity mode but supplies neither the explicit operator form nor the values of the free parameters (light-matter coupling and anharmonicity) used to locate the critical points; without these, the reported freezing cannot be reproduced or checked against limiting cases.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit form and parameter values should have been stated more clearly. In the revised manuscript we now include the full operator expression for the generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian H = ω_c a†a + Σ_i (ω_v b_i†b_i + χ b_i†b_i†b_i b_i) + g Σ_i (a† b_i + a b_i†), together with the specific numerical values of the light-matter coupling g and anharmonicity χ used to locate the critical points (g_c1 ≈ 0.12 ω_v and g_c2 ≈ 0.35 ω_v for the chosen χ = 0.05 ω_v). These parameters are also summarized in a new table and the g = 0 limit is explicitly recovered to allow direct verification of the reported freezing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on Critical Couplings] The central claim of 'almost totally freeze' dynamics at critical couplings rests on exact destructive interference within a closed, three-mode unitary evolution; the text provides no analysis of how additional vibrational modes, cavity leakage, or weak bath couplings would lift the degeneracy and restore finite transfer rates on relevant timescales.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the perfect freezing is an exact feature of the closed unitary three-mode dynamics. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated limitations paragraph that (i) states the ideal-model assumption, (ii) qualitatively discusses how additional vibrational modes would introduce new pathways that lift the exact degeneracy, (iii) estimates the effect of cavity leakage (finite photon lifetime) and weak Markovian bath couplings via perturbative arguments, and (iv) indicates that the stabilization may survive on experimentally accessible timescales provided the perturbation strength remains smaller than the critical coupling gaps. A full open-system Lindblad treatment lies outside the present scope but is identified as a natural extension. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard Hamiltonian with externally varied parameters yields independent dynamical regimes

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian for two anharmonic vibrators plus one cavity mode. Coupling strengths are introduced as free external parameters and swept numerically or analytically to locate interference-driven freezing points. No equation defines a critical coupling in terms of the observed freezing itself, no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The reported regimes therefore emerge from the model's own time evolution rather than from any definitional or self-referential closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the generalized Tavis-Cummings description for anharmonic vibrons and the assumption that the isolated two-mode-plus-cavity system exhibits the reported interference without external baths.

free parameters (2)
  • light-matter coupling strength
    Varied continuously to locate the critical points separating trapping and transfer regimes
  • anharmonicity strength
    Controls the nonlinear interaction that enables self-trapping in the absence of the cavity
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The vibrational modes are adequately described by a two-site anharmonic oscillator model coupled to a single quantized cavity mode
    Basis of the generalized Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian used throughout
  • ad hoc to paper The system evolves unitarily with no decoherence or dissipation
    Required for the infinite-lifetime QST and the exact freezing at critical couplings

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5620 in / 1558 out tokens · 39869 ms · 2026-05-10T18:50:57.389017+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    unstable

    Population Imbalance∆P: Evidence of Different Dynamical Regimes Fig. 3 shows the time evolution of the vibron popu- lation imbalance ∆P(t) forN B = 3,A= 4, and in- creasing values of light-matter couplingG= 0→5. ForG= 0, it illustrates the “unstable” pure vibronic QST phenomenon previously displayed in Fig. 2, but over a longer timescale. One thus clearly...

  2. [2]

    To highlight this connection, we consider the triangular lattice (see Fig

    Limit Probabilities: Light-Induced Symmetry Breaking We now show that the existence of a critical light–matter coupling at which QST becomes stabilized is linked to the emergence of symmetry breaking in the system. To highlight this connection, we consider the triangular lattice (see Fig. 1) and evaluate the limiting probabilities, as defined in Eq. (9), ...

  3. [3]

    Polaritonic Energy Spectrum: Spectral Signature of Light-Induced QST To understand the origin of the critical point, let us in- vestigate the nature of the polaritonic energy spectrum whose dependence onGis shown in Fig. 7a. According to the shape of the Hamiltonian displayed in Fig. 1, when G= 0, the full energy spectrum includes the spectra of the AQD w...

  4. [4]

    The vibra- tional energy transfer between the two vibrational modes thus results from the coupling between the polaritonic states|po (±) 1 ⟩and|po (±) 2 ⟩. In contrast to the transfer in standard quantum self-trapping, which depends only on the effective couplingJ g, the interaction between the po- laritonic states involves both effective hopping constant...

  5. [5]

    Y. Kubo, F. R. Ong, P. Bertet, D. Vion, V. Jacques, D. Zheng, A. Dr´ eau, J.-F. Roch, A. Auffeves, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, M. F. Barthe, P. Bergonzo, and D. Esteve, 14 Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to a superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 140502 (2010)

  6. [6]

    Shelton, I

    D. Shelton, I. Brener, J. C. Ginn, M. B. Sinclair, D. W. Peters, K. R. Coffey, and G. D. Boreman, Strong coupling between nanoscale metamaterials and phonons, Nano Letters11, 2104 (2011), pMID: 21462937

  7. [7]

    I. J. Luxmoore, C. H. Gan, P. Q. Liu, F. Valmorra, P. Li, J. Faist, and G. R. Nash, Strong coupling in the far- infrared between graphene plasmons and the surface op- tical phonons of silicon dioxide, ACS Photonics1, 1151 (2014)

  8. [8]

    Sivarajah, A

    P. Sivarajah, A. Steinbacher, B. Dastrup, J. Lu, M. Xi- ang, W. Ren, S. Kamba, S. Cao, and K. A. Nelson, Thz-frequency magnon-phonon-polaritons in the collec- tive strong-coupling regime, Journal of Applied Physics 125, 213103 (2019)

  9. [9]

    Kaluzny, P

    Y. Kaluzny, P. Goy, M. Gross, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Observation of self-induced rabi oscillations in two-level atoms excited inside a resonant cavity: The ringing regime of superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1175 (1983)

  10. [10]

    M. G. Raizen, R. J. Thompson, R. J. Brecha, H. J. Kim- ble, and H. J. Carmichael, Normal-mode splitting and linewidth averaging for two-state atoms in an optical cav- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 240 (1989)

  11. [11]

    R. J. Thompson, G. Rempe, and H. J. Kimble, Observa- tion of normal-mode splitting for an atom in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1132 (1992)

  12. [12]

    Weisbuch, M

    C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode split- ting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314 (1992)

  13. [13]

    D. G. Lidzey, D. Bradley, M. Skolnick, T. Virgili, S. Walker, and D. Whittaker, Strong exciton–photon cou- pling in an organic semiconductor microcavity, Nature 395, 53 (1998)

  14. [14]

    D. G. Lidzey, D. D. Bradley, A. Armitage, S. Walker, and M. S. Skolnick, Photon-mediated hybridization of frenkel excitons in organic semiconductor microcavities, Science 288, 1620 (2000)

  15. [15]

    Herrera and F

    F. Herrera and F. C. Spano, Cavity-controlled chemistry in molecular ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 238301 (2016)

  16. [16]

    Groenhof and J

    G. Groenhof and J. J. Toppari, Coherent light harvest- ing through strong coupling to confined light, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry Letters9, 4848 (2018), pMID: 30085671, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02032

  17. [17]

    S. Wang, T. Chervy, J. George, J. A. Hutchison, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Quantum yield of polari- ton emission from hybrid light-matter states, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry Letters5, 1433 (2014), pMID: 26269990, https://doi.org/10.1021/jz5004439

  18. [18]

    F´ abri, B

    C. F´ abri, B. Lasorne, G. J. Hal´ asz, L. S. Cederbaum, and ´A. Vib´ ok, Striking generic impact of light-induced non-adiabaticity in polyatomic molecules, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 5324 (2020), pMID: 32530631, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01574

  19. [19]

    F´ abri, B

    C. F´ abri, B. Lasorne, G. J. Hal´ asz, L. S. Cederbaum, and ´A. Vib´ ok, Quantum light-induced nonadiabatic phe- nomena in the absorption spectrum of formaldehyde: Full- and reduced-dimensionality studies, The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 234302 (2020)

  20. [20]

    Csehi, G

    A. Csehi, G. J. Hal´ asz, L. S. Cederbaum, and ´A. Vib´ ok, Competition between light-induced and intrinsic nonadi- abatic phenomena in diatomics, The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry Letters8, 1624 (2017), pMID: 28333471, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00413

  21. [21]

    F´ abri, G

    C. F´ abri, G. J. Hal´ asz, and ´A. Vib´ ok, Probing light- induced conical intersections by monitoring multidi- mensional polaritonic surfaces, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 1172 (2022)

  22. [22]

    Sandik, J

    G. Sandik, J. Feist, F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, and T. Schwartz, Cavity-enhanced energy transport in molecular systems, Nature Materials24, 344 (2025)

  23. [23]

    Bhuyan, J

    R. Bhuyan, J. Mony, O. Kotov, G. W. Castellanos, J. Gomez Rivas, T. O. Shegai, and K. Borjesson, The rise and current status of polaritonic photochemistry and photophysics, Chemical Reviews123, 10877 (2023)

  24. [24]

    Feist and F

    J. Feist and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Extraordinary exciton conductance induced by strong coupling, Physical review letters114, 196402 (2015)

  25. [25]

    Hagenm¨ uller, J

    D. Hagenm¨ uller, J. Dubail, F. Mattiotti, G. Pupillo, and J. Schachenmayer, Disorder in cavity-modified transport and chemistry, Polariton Chemistry: Molecules in Cavi- ties , 193 (2025)

  26. [26]

    Schachenmayer, C

    J. Schachenmayer, C. Genes, E. Tignone, and G. Pupillo, Cavity-enhanced transport of excitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 196403 (2015)

  27. [27]

    D. M. Coles, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, R. T. Grant, R. A. Tay- lor, S. K. Saikin, A. Aspuru-Guzik, D. G. Lidzey, J. K.-H. Tang, and J. M. Smith, Strong coupling between chloro- somes of photosynthetic bacteria and a confined optical cavity mode, Nature communications5, 5561 (2014)

  28. [28]

    Spano, Optical microcavities enhance the exciton co- herence length and eliminate vibronic coupling in j- aggregates, The Journal of Chemical Physics142(2015)

    F. Spano, Optical microcavities enhance the exciton co- herence length and eliminate vibronic coupling in j- aggregates, The Journal of Chemical Physics142(2015)

  29. [29]

    G. G. Rozenman, K. Akulov, A. Golombek, and T. Schwartz, Long-range transport of or- ganic exciton-polaritons revealed by ultrafast microscopy, ACS Photonics5, 105 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01332

  30. [30]

    S. Hou, M. Khatoniar, K. Ding, Y. Qu, A. Napolov, V. M. Menon, and S. R. Forrest, Ultralong-range energy transport in a disordered organic semiconductor at room temperature via coherent exciton-polariton propagation, Advanced Materials32, 2002127 (2020)

  31. [31]

    Balasubrahmaniyam, A

    M. Balasubrahmaniyam, A. Simkhovich, A. Golombek, G. Sandik, G. Ankonina, and T. Schwartz, From en- hanced diffusion to ultrafast ballistic motion of hy- brid light–matter excitations, Nature Materials22, 338 (2023)

  32. [32]

    E. V. Denning, M. Wubs, N. Stenger, J. Mørk, and P. T. Kristensen, Cavity-induced exciton localization and po- lariton blockade in two-dimensional semiconductors cou- pled to an electromagnetic resonator, Physical Review Research4, L012020 (2022)

  33. [33]

    I. Y. Chestnov, T. Khudaiberganov, A. Alodjants, and A. Kavokin, Heat-assisted self-localization of exciton po- laritons, arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07779 (2018)

  34. [34]

    Rokaj, S

    V. Rokaj, S. I. Mistakidis, and H. Sadeghpour, Cavity in- duced collective behavior in the polaritonic ground state, SciPost Physics14, 167 (2023)

  35. [35]

    M. Sato, B. E. Hubbard, and A. J. Sievers, Colloquium: Nonlinear energy localization and its manipulation in mi- cromechanical oscillator arrays, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 137 (2006). 15

  36. [36]

    Flach and C

    S. Flach and C. Willis, Discrete breathers, Physics Re- ports295, 181 (1998)

  37. [37]

    Flach and A

    S. Flach and A. V. Gorbach, Discrete breathers — ad- vances in theory and applications, Physics Reports467, 1 (2008)

  38. [38]

    A. S. Davydov and N. I. Kislukha, Solitary excitons in one-dimensional molecular chains, physica status solidi (b)59, 465 (1973)

  39. [39]

    Scott, Davydov’s soliton, Physics Reports217, 1 (1992)

    A. Scott, Davydov’s soliton, Physics Reports217, 1 (1992)

  40. [40]

    Eilbeck, P

    J. Eilbeck, P. Lomdahl, and A. Scott, The discrete self- trapping equation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena16, 318 (1985)

  41. [41]

    A. J. Sievers and S. Takeno, Intrinsic localized modes in anharmonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 970 (1988)

  42. [42]

    J. C. Kimball, C. Y. Fong, and Y. R. Shen, Anharmonic- ity, phonon localization, two-phonon bound states, and vibrational spectra, Phys. Rev. B23, 4946 (1981)

  43. [43]

    B. N. J. Persson, Application of a boson hubbard model to vibrational dynamics in adsorbate layers, Phys. Rev. B46, 12701 (1992)

  44. [44]

    C. Falvo, Linear and non-linear infrared response of one- dimensional vibrational holstein polarons in the anti- adiabatic limit: Optical and acoustical phonon models, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 074103 (2018)

  45. [45]

    Pouthier, Two-vibron bound states inα-helix pro- teins: The interplay between the intramolecular anhar- monicity and the strong vibron–phonon coupling, Phys

    V. Pouthier, Two-vibron bound states inα-helix pro- teins: The interplay between the intramolecular anhar- monicity and the strong vibron–phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. E68, 021909 (2003)

  46. [46]

    Bogani, G

    F. Bogani, G. Cardini, V. Schettino, and P. L. Tas- selli, Vibrational relaxation and dephasing of two-phonon bound states in molecular crystals, Phys. Rev. B42, 2307 (1990)

  47. [47]

    Wright, J

    E. Wright, J. Eilbeck, M. Hays, P. Miller, and A. Scott, The quantum discrete self-trapping equation in the hartree approximation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom- ena69, 18 (1993)

  48. [48]

    Bernstein, J

    L. Bernstein, J. C. Eilbeck, and A. C. Scott, The quan- tum theory of local modes in a coupled system of nonlin- ear oscillators, Nonlinearity3, 293 (1990)

  49. [49]

    Scott, J

    A. Scott, J. Eilbeck, and H. Gilhøj, Quantum lattice soli- tons, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena78, 194 (1994)

  50. [50]

    Dorignac, J

    J. Dorignac, J. C. Eilbeck, M. Salerno, and A. C. Scott, Quantum signatures of breather-breather interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 025504 (2004)

  51. [51]

    Proville, Biphonons in the klein-gordon lattice, Phys

    L. Proville, Biphonons in the klein-gordon lattice, Phys. Rev. B71, 104306 (2005)

  52. [52]

    Falvo, V

    C. Falvo, V. Pouthier, and J. Eilbeck, Fast energy trans- fer mediated by multi-quanta bound states in a nonlinear quantum lattice, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena221, 58 (2006)

  53. [53]

    Pouthier, Boundary-induced energy localization in a nonlinear quantum lattice, Phys

    V. Pouthier, Boundary-induced energy localization in a nonlinear quantum lattice, Phys. Rev. B76, 224302 (2007)

  54. [54]

    R. A. Pinto, M. Haque, and S. Flach, Edge-localized states in quantum one-dimensional lattices, Phys. Rev. A79, 052118 (2009)

  55. [55]

    R. A. Pinto, J. P. Nguenang, and S. Flach, Boundary effects on quantum q-breathers in a bose–hubbard chain, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena238, 581 (2009)

  56. [56]

    Pouthier, Quantum self-trapping on a star graph, Phys

    V. Pouthier, Quantum self-trapping on a star graph, Phys. Rev. E105, 044304 (2022)

  57. [57]

    Pouthier, Two-exciton bound state quantum self- trapping in an extended star graph, J

    V. Pouthier, Two-exciton bound state quantum self- trapping in an extended star graph, J. Chem. Phys.156, 155101 (2022)

  58. [58]

    Bernstein, Quantizing a self-trapping transition, Phys- ica D: Nonlinear Phenomena68, 174 (1993)

    L. Bernstein, Quantizing a self-trapping transition, Phys- ica D: Nonlinear Phenomena68, 174 (1993)

  59. [59]

    Pouthier, Multi-quanta energy relaxation in a nonlin- ear quantum dimer coupled to a phonon bath, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena221, 13 (2006)

    V. Pouthier, Multi-quanta energy relaxation in a nonlin- ear quantum dimer coupled to a phonon bath, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena221, 13 (2006)

  60. [60]

    Tavis and F

    M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, Exact solution for ann- molecule—radiation-field hamiltonian, Phys. Rev.170, 379 (1968)

  61. [61]

    TAVIS and F

    M. TAVIS and F. W. CUMMINGS, Approximate solu- tions for ann-molecule-radiation-field hamiltonian, Phys. Rev.188, 692 (1969)

  62. [62]

    F. J. Hern´ andez and F. Herrera, Multi-level quantum rabi model for anharmonic vibrational polaritons, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics151, 144116 (2019)

  63. [63]

    T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, Polariton re- laxation under vibrational strong coupling: Comparing cavity molecular dynamics simulations against fermi’s golden rule rate, The Journal of Chemical Physics156, 134106 (2022)

  64. [64]

    J. d. Pino, J. Feist, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Quantum theory of collective strong coupling of molecular vibra- tions with a microcavity mode, New Journal of Physics 17, 053040 (2015)

  65. [65]

    Mulken, V

    O. Mulken, V. Bierbaun, and A. Blumen, Coherent exci- ton transport in dendrimers and continuous-time quan- tum walks, J. Chem. Phys.124, 124905 (2006)

  66. [66]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applica- tions(John Wiley & Sons, 1998)

  67. [67]

    M¨ ulken and A

    O. M¨ ulken and A. Blumen, Efficiency of quantum and classical transport on graphs, Phys. Rev. E73, 066117 (2006)