arxiv: 2604.06154 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: no theorem link

Exclusive Unlearning

Mutsumi Sasaki , Kouta Nakayama , Yusuke Miyao , Yohei Oseki , Masaru Isonuma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords machine unlearninglarge language modelsAI safetyjailbreaksdomain-specific knowledgeharmful content removalLLM alignment

0 comments

The pith

Exclusive Unlearning forgets everything except chosen domains to produce LLMs that stay safe against jailbreaks while keeping medicine and math capabilities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Large language models risk generating harmful content when deployed in fields such as healthcare and education. Existing unlearning methods attempt to erase particular harmful items but struggle to cover the full range of possible dangers. This paper introduces Exclusive Unlearning, which instead removes all knowledge and expressions outside a small set of retained safe domains. The resulting model resists a wide variety of harmful inputs, including jailbreaks, while still handling detailed instructions in the kept domains. If the method works as described, it would let developers create safer LLMs for industrial use without having to enumerate every unsafe target in advance.

Core claim

Instead of listing individual targets for forgetting, Exclusive Unlearning extensively forgets everything except the knowledge and expressions the developers wish to retain. This produces a model that ensures safety against a wide range of inputs, including jailbreaks, while maintaining the ability to respond to diverse instructions in specific domains such as medicine and mathematics.

What carries the argument

Exclusive Unlearning, a process that broadly erases model knowledge and expressions outside targeted domains to achieve comprehensive safety without enumerating harmful items.

If this is right

Safety can be achieved without enumerating every possible harmful target.
Resistance extends to jailbreaks and other diverse harmful inputs.
Domain-specific response quality in areas such as medicine and mathematics is preserved.
Industrial applications in regulated fields become feasible with lower risk of unintended harmful outputs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method may extend to additional domains if retention can be controlled at finer granularity.
General capabilities not explicitly retained could degrade in ways not measured here.
The approach might complement rather than replace existing alignment techniques.
Real-world testing against evolving jailbreak strategies would be required to confirm lasting protection.

Load-bearing premise

Broad erasure of all non-retained content can be performed precisely enough to remove harmful knowledge without degrading safety or domain-specific performance.

What would settle it

Demonstrating that the resulting model still generates harmful or jailbreak-compliant responses to prompts outside the retained domains would show the safety claim does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06154 by Kouta Nakayama, Masaru Isonuma, Mutsumi Sasaki, Yohei Oseki, Yusuke Miyao.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overview of Exclusive Unlearning (EU). By specifying only “what to retain” and exclusively forgetting everything else, this method can circumvent the limitations of traditional unlearning, where generalizing to unseen harmful domains not included in the unlearning data is difficult. behaviors, thereby fundamentally bypassing the limitations of data-dependent unlearning. Although this setting is less suited… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: t-SNE visualization of the final-layer representation space at the last-token position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: t-SNE visualization of the final-layer representation space at the last-token [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Comparison of forgetting performance in the medical-retention setting between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

When introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) into industrial applications, such as healthcare and education, the risk of generating harmful content becomes a significant challenge. While existing machine unlearning methods can erase specific harmful knowledge and expressions, diverse harmful content makes comprehensive removal difficult. In this study, instead of individually listing targets for forgetting, we propose Exclusive Unlearning (EU), which aims for broad harm removal by extensively forgetting everything except for the knowledge and expressions we wish to retain. We demonstrate that through Exclusive Unlearning, it is possible to obtain a model that ensures safety against a wide range of inputs, including jailbreaks, while maintaining the ability to respond to diverse instructions related to specific domains such as medicine and mathematics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper flips machine unlearning by retaining only narrow domain knowledge to get broad safety, but the abstract offers no evidence the method actually works.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that instead of listing harmful targets to erase, they propose forgetting everything except the knowledge and phrasing you want to keep, such as medicine or math. This is supposed to produce a model that resists jailbreaks and other harms while still handling domain-specific instructions. The reversal is the new part: prior unlearning work focuses on targeted removal, and this reframes the problem around defining a safe retained scope. It does a clear job laying out why comprehensive harm removal is hard when harmful content is diverse. The soft spot is obvious and central. The abstract states they demonstrate the approach, yet it gives no methods, no model details, no training procedure, no evaluation metrics, and no results on either safety or retained capability. Without those, the claim that selectivity works without side effects stays untested. The assumption that broad forgetting can be controlled precisely enough for real deployment is the load-bearing one, and nothing here shows it holds. This is for people working on practical LLM safety in restricted domains. A reader already thinking about unlearning variants might pick up the framing, but the paper needs the experimental section to be worth serious time. I would send it to peer review if the full version includes reproducible runs and baselines; the idea is straightforward enough to check.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Exclusive Unlearning (EU) as a machine unlearning technique for LLMs. Rather than targeting specific harmful knowledge for removal, EU performs broad forgetting of all content except retained domain-specific knowledge and expressions (e.g., medicine and mathematics). The central claim is that this yields models that are safe against a wide range of inputs including jailbreaks while still responding effectively to diverse instructions in the retained domains.

Significance. If the method can be shown to work as described, it would address a practical limitation of existing unlearning approaches—the difficulty of exhaustively enumerating diverse harmful content—by inverting the problem to retention of narrow, safe domains. This could have value for deploying LLMs in regulated settings such as healthcare and education, provided the selectivity of retention does not introduce new failure modes.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript asserts that 'we demonstrate' the effectiveness of EU for safety against jailbreaks while retaining domain capabilities, yet the text contains no experimental setup, datasets, training procedure, evaluation metrics, baselines, or results. Without these, the central empirical claim cannot be assessed.
[Abstract] Abstract: The description of EU is limited to a high-level goal ('extensively forgetting everything except...'). No concrete formulation is given for the unlearning objective, the retention data construction, the optimization procedure, or how domain boundaries are enforced during training.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback. We acknowledge that the current manuscript presents Exclusive Unlearning primarily as a conceptual approach and lacks the concrete technical details and empirical validation required to substantiate the claims. We will perform a major revision to address these gaps.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript asserts that 'we demonstrate' the effectiveness of EU for safety against jailbreaks while retaining domain capabilities, yet the text contains no experimental setup, datasets, training procedure, evaluation metrics, baselines, or results. Without these, the central empirical claim cannot be assessed.

Authors: We agree with this assessment. The abstract's phrasing implies empirical results that are not present in the current version, which is limited to a high-level proposal. In the revised manuscript we will remove the overstated claim from the abstract, add a full Experiments section, and include: (1) datasets for retention (e.g., curated medical and mathematical corpora) and safety evaluation (jailbreak and harmful prompt benchmarks); (2) the full training procedure; (3) quantitative metrics for both safety (harmfulness rate, jailbreak success) and capability retention (domain-specific accuracy); (4) baselines such as standard gradient-ascent unlearning and refusal fine-tuning; and (5) results tables demonstrating the claimed trade-off. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The description of EU is limited to a high-level goal ('extensively forgetting everything except...'). No concrete formulation is given for the unlearning objective, the retention data construction, the optimization procedure, or how domain boundaries are enforced during training.

Authors: This observation is accurate for the current draft. The revised version will contain a dedicated Methods section providing: (1) the formal objective combining a broad forgetting loss (e.g., negative log-likelihood on general web data) with a retention loss on domain-specific examples; (2) explicit construction of retention data via filtering and augmentation from sources such as PubMed abstracts and mathematical textbooks; (3) the optimization algorithm, including any use of gradient ascent/descent, learning-rate schedules, and regularization; and (4) mechanisms for domain-boundary enforcement, such as data masking, auxiliary domain classifiers, or post-training filtering to prevent capability leakage outside the retained domains. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper proposes Exclusive Unlearning as a method for broad harm removal by retaining only domain-specific knowledge (e.g., medicine, mathematics) and forgetting everything else. This definition is then empirically demonstrated for jailbreak resistance and domain capability preservation. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation load-bearing premises, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the abstract or described approach. The central claim rests on the method's implementation and evaluation results, which are independent of any self-referential reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Since only the abstract is available, no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the text. The approach likely assumes standard LLM fine-tuning capabilities but details are missing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5418 in / 1151 out tokens · 46398 ms · 2026-05-10T18:36:27.556042+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

MathQA: Towards interpretable math word problem solving with operation-based formalisms

Aida Amini, Saadia Gabriel, Shanchuan Lin, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Yejin Choi, and Han- naneh Hajishirzi. MathQA: Towards interpretable math word problem solving with operation-based formalisms. In Jill Burstein, Christy Doran, and Thamar Solorio (eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Compu- tational...

2019
[2]

Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168. Emma Croxford, Yanjun Gao, Elliot First, Nicholas Pellegrino, Miranda Schnier, John Caskey, Madeline Oguss, Graham Wills, Guanhua Chen, Dmitriy Dligach, et al. Evaluating clinical AI summaries with large language models as judges.npj Digital Medicine, 8(1):640,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Avoiding copyright infringement via large language model unlearning

Guangyao Dou, Zheyuan Liu, Qing Lyu, Kaize Ding, and Eric Wong. Avoiding copyright infringement via large language model unlearning. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025, April

2025
[4]

Ethan He, Abhinav Khattar, Ryan Prenger, Vijay Korthikanti, Zijie Yan, Tong Liu, Shiqing Fan, Ashwath Aithal, Mohammad Shoeybi, and Bryan Catanzaro

URL https://zenodo.org/ records/12608602. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021a. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id= d7KBjmI3GmQ. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, A...

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams, 2020

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13081. Qiao Jin, Bhuwan Dhingra, Zhengping Liu, William Cohen, and Xinghua Lu. PubMedQA: A dataset for biomedical research question answering. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), November

work page arXiv 2009
[6]

Xiangman Li, Xiaodong Wu, Qi Li, Jianbing Ni, and Rongxing Lu

doi: 10.1109/SPW63631.2024.00018. Xiangman Li, Xiaodong Wu, Qi Li, Jianbing Ni, and Rongxing Lu. SafeLLM: Unlearning harmful outputs from large language models against jailbreak attacks,

work page doi:10.1109/spw63631.2024.00018 2024
[7]

11 Preprint

URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.15182. 11 Preprint. Under review. Yunxiang Li, Zihan Li, Kai Zhang, Ruilong Dan, Steve Jiang, and You Zhang. ChatDoctor: A medical chat model fine-tuned on a large language model meta-ai (llama) using medical domain knowledge,

work page arXiv
[8]

Chatdoctor: A medical chat model fine-tuned on llama model using medical domain knowledge

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14070. Sijia Liu, Yuanshun Yao, Jinghan Jia, Stephen Casper, Nathalie Baracaldo, Peter Hase, Yuguang Yao, Chris Yuhao Liu, Xiaojun Xu, Hang Li, et al. Rethinking machine unlearning for large language models.Nature Machine Intelligence, 7(2):181–194,

work page arXiv
[9]

Jailbreaking chat- gpt via prompt engineering: An empirical study

Xiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, and Chaowei Xiao. AutoDAN: Generating stealthy jailbreak prompts on aligned large language models. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024a. Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Zhengzi Xu, Yuekang Li, Yaowen Zheng, Ying Zhang, Lida Zhao, Tianwei Zhang, Kailong Wang, and Yang Liu. Jailbreaking ChatGPT via ...

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

Eraser: Jail- breaking defense in large language models via unlearning harmful knowledge.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05880, 2024

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05880. Jakub Łucki, Boyi Wei, Yangsibo Huang, Peter Henderson, Florian Tramèr, and Javier Rando. An adversarial perspective on machine unlearning for AI safety.Transactions on Machine Learning Research,

work page arXiv
[11]

See also: https://huggingface.co/ meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct , https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3

URL https://www.llama.com/docs/ model-cards-and-prompt-formats/llama3_2/ . See also: https://huggingface.co/ meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct , https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3. 2-3B-Instruct. Accessed 2026-03-31. Team OLMo, Pete Walsh, Luca Soldaini, Dirk Groeneveld, Kyle Lo, Shane Arora, Akshita Bhagia, Yuling Gu, Shengyi Huang, Matt Jordan, Na...

2026
[12]

2 OLMo 2 Furious

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00656. Ankit Pal, Logesh Kumar Umapathi, and Malaikannan Sankarasubbu. MedMCQA: A large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical domain question answering. In Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, volume 174 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 248–260, 07–08 Apr

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[13]

do anything now

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03825. Nianwen Si, Hao Zhang, Heyu Chang, Wenlin Zhang, Dan Qu, and Weiqiang Zhang. Knowledge unlearning for LLMs: Tasks, methods, and challenges,

work page arXiv
[14]

Knowledge unlearning for llms: Tasks, methods, and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15766, 2023

URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2311.15766. Aaditya Singh, Adam Fry, Adam Perelman, et al. OpenAI GPT-5 System Card,

work page arXiv
[15]

OpenAI GPT-5 System Card

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03267. David Vilares and Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez. HEAD-QA: A healthcare dataset for complex reasoning. InProceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 960–966, July

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

Jin Yao, Eli Chien, Minxin Du, Xinyao Niu, Tianhao Wang, Zezhou Cheng, and Xiang Yue

URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/ file/fd6613131889a4b656206c50a8bd7790-Paper-Conference.pdf. Jin Yao, Eli Chien, Minxin Du, Xinyao Niu, Tianhao Wang, Zezhou Cheng, and Xiang Yue. Machine unlearning of pre-trained large language models. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volu...

2023
[17]

Jiahao Yu, Xingwei Lin, Zheng Yu, and Xinyu Xing

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07795. Jiahao Yu, Xingwei Lin, Zheng Yu, and Xinyu Xing. GPTFUZZER: Red teaming large language models with auto-generated jailbreak prompts, 2024a. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2309.10253. Longhui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng YU, Zhengying Liu, Yu Zhang, James Kwok, Zhenguo Li, Adrian Weller, and Weiyang Liu. MetaMath: B...

work page arXiv
[18]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14558 (2024)

Xinlu Zhang, Chenxin Tian, Xianjun Yang, Lichang Chen, Zekun Li, and Linda Ruth Petzold. AlpaCare:instruction-tuned large language models for medical application, 2025a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14558. Zhexin Zhang, Yida Lu, Jingyuan Ma, Di Zhang, Rui Li, Pei Ke, Hao Sun, Lei Sha, Zhifang Sui, Hongning Wang, and Minlie Huang. ShieldLM: Empowering LL...

work page arXiv
[19]

From theft to bomb-making: The ripple effect of unlearning in defending against jailbreak attacks

Zhexin Zhang, Junxiao Yang, Yida Lu, Pei Ke, Shiyao Cui, Chujie Zheng, Hongning Wang, and Minlie Huang. From theft to bomb-making: The ripple effect of unlearning in defending against jailbreak attacks. InSocially Responsible and Trustworthy Foundation Models at NeurIPS 2025, 2025b. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=4opLLOGVav. Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Nich...

2025
[20]

Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15043. 13 Preprint. Under review. Factor V alue Harm-1 Harm-2 JB-1 JB-2 Base(T,k,U,A,N) = (2.0, 100, 64, 128, 40,000)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Temperature 0.7 17.0 30.9 19.7 21.6 Temperature 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Temperature 5.0 1.0 22.6 4.7 7.6 Top-k0 28.0 28.1 55.8 61.6 Top-k500 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 User length 16 2.0 0.0 33.0 39.9 User le...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[21]

Under review

Across generation lengths, the user-side length has a much larger effect than the assistant-side length: shortening the 14 Preprint. Under review. Jailbreak Type #Num Description Roleplay Attack 4 Requires the model to play a single malicious role or multiple malicious roles and generate harmful content (Liu et al., 2024b). Privilege Escalation Attack 2 R...

2023
[22]

As described in § 3.2, we evaluate free-form responses on MedInstruct-test (216 medical instructions) and iCliniq (Li et al.,

D Details of LLM-based Evaluation in the Medical Domain In this paper, we use GPT-5-2025-08-07 for LLM-based evaluation in the medical domain. As described in § 3.2, we evaluate free-form responses on MedInstruct-test (216 medical instructions) and iCliniq (Li et al.,

2025
[23]

2https://github.com/thu-coai/SafeUnlearning 15 Preprint

(1,000 patient queries) using four dimensions: Accurate, Useful, Comprehensible, and Succinct, each scored on a five-point scale. 2https://github.com/thu-coai/SafeUnlearning 15 Preprint. Under review. <Accurate> 1 = Multiple major errors with overt falsifications or fabrications 2 = A major error in assertion occurs with an overt falsification or fabricat...

2025
[24]

As retention baselines, we use the original model before unlearning and a model trained only with the retention objective in Eq

E Details of Baselines for Forgetting and Retention To assess whether our method can simultaneously preserve target-domain capabilities and forget harmful inputs and jailbreak attacks, we consider both retention and forgetting baselines. As retention baselines, we use the original model before unlearning and a model trained only with the retention objecti...

2025
[25]

For Llama-3.2-based models, we search over λ∈ { 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8}. For OLMo-2-based models, we observe that training tends to be more stable when for- getting is emphasized more strongly, and therefore additionally consider λ= 0.95, i.e., λ∈ { 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 0.95}. The hyperparameter tuning results for the settings of retaining medical capability a...

1930