pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06301 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

c=1 strings as a matrix integral

Scott Collier , Lorenz Eberhardt , Victor A. Rodriguez
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords c=1 stringS-matrixmatrix integralintersection numbersspectral curvetrialityBrillouin zoneunitarity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The c=1 string's perturbative S-matrix is equivalently described by a double-scaled matrix integral with spectral curve x(z)=2√2 cos(z), y(z)=sin(z).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives closed-form expressions for the c=1 string amplitudes as intersection numbers on the moduli space of Riemann surfaces. These expressions naturally describe a discretized target space in which momentum is conserved only modulo an integer. The physical S-matrix is recovered by restricting to the first Brillouin zone and analytically continuing to Lorentzian kinematics. The resulting amplitudes satisfy unitarity and a Mirzakhani recursion directly from the intersection theory, and match known matrix quantum mechanics results. Combined with the existing duality to matrix quantum mechanics, this establishes a triality among the worldsheet, matrix quantum mechanics, and matrix integral formulations.

Core claim

The perturbative S-matrix of the c=1 string admits a description in terms of a double-scaled (0+0)-dimensional matrix integral based on the spectral curve x(z)=2√2 cos(z), y(z)=sin(z). Intersection numbers on the moduli space compute amplitudes for a discretized target space; physical elements are recovered by Brillouin-zone restriction followed by analytic continuation to Lorentzian signature. These amplitudes obey perturbative unitarity and Mirzakhani recursion directly from the intersection expressions and agree with matrix quantum mechanics.

What carries the argument

The spectral curve x(z)=2√2 cos(z), y(z)=sin(z) of the double-scaled (0+0)-dimensional matrix integral, which generates the intersection-number expressions for the discretized amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The intersection theory expressions directly prove perturbative spacetime unitarity without reference to other formulations.
  • Amplitudes obey a Mirzakhani-type recursion relation.
  • Detailed numerical agreement holds with all known matrix quantum mechanics results.
  • The three formulations—worldsheet, matrix quantum mechanics, and matrix integral—are exactly equivalent at the perturbative level.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same intersection-number approach might extend to other values of the central charge or to non-perturbative completions of the theory.
  • The discretized momentum picture could connect to lattice or compactified models in related quantum gravity contexts.
  • The explicit matrix-integral representation may enable new exact computations of higher-genus or multi-point amplitudes.
  • The triality suggests that similar matrix-integral duals could exist for other exactly solvable string models.

Load-bearing premise

Physical S-matrix elements are recovered by restricting the intersection-number expressions to the first Brillouin zone and then analytically continuing to Lorentzian kinematics.

What would settle it

A concrete mismatch between a computed higher-point amplitude (for example the four-point function) in the matrix integral after Brillouin-zone restriction and the known matrix quantum mechanics result would falsify the claimed triality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06301 by Lorenz Eberhardt, Scott Collier, Victor A. Rodriguez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dual descriptions of c = 1 strings. The first leg of the triality (worldsheet ↔ MQM) is the well-established con￾jectural duality from the early 90s. The second leg (MQM ↔ matrix integral) was partially anticipated by Alexandrov [24], who identified a spectral curve from the FZZT disk amplitude, but was not developed into a full computational framework. – 3 – [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The unshaded area represents the region in the external Liouville momenta where the moduli space integral that defines the CLS four-point function converges. The shaded regions correspond to the 90-degree wedges of divergence emanating from the branch points of the amplitude. In the limit that b is taken to one, the region of convergence pinches off and infinitely many branch points collide at pi ± pj = −1… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Passage from vertex colors mv to edge variables me = me◦ − m•e. The left panel shows two vertices connected by an edge, with vertex colors m•e and me◦. The right panel shows the equivalent description in terms of the edge variable me, which can be thought of as a discrete difference of positions. – 16 – [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The three distinct ways of embedding a pair of pants with a distinguished external cuff (labeled by p1 above) into a surface. These correspond to the three classes of terms in the Mirzakhani-type recursion (3.35) for the c = 1 string amplitudes ˆsg,n(p). In the c = 1 string case there is a notion of ingoing versus outgoing momenta flowing through the diagram, although here the recursion is formulated for E… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the perturbative $S$-matrix of the $c=1$ string and show that it admits a description in terms of a double-scaled (0+0)-dimensional matrix integral based on the spectral curve $\mathsf{x}(z) = 2\sqrt{2}\cos(z)$, $\mathsf{y}(z)=\sin(z)$. Combined with the famous duality to matrix quantum mechanics, this establishes a triality between three formulations of the theory: the worldsheet description, matrix quantum mechanics, and a matrix integral. Starting from the intersection number expressions for the complex Liouville string, we derive closed-form Feynman rule expressions for the $c=1$ amplitudes as intersection numbers on the moduli space of Riemann surfaces. The intersection theory naturally computes amplitudes corresponding to a discretized target space where momentum is conserved only modulo an integer. The physical $S$-matrix elements are recovered by restriction to the first `Brillouin zone' and analytic continuation to Lorentzian kinematics. We prove that these amplitudes satisfy perturbative spacetime unitarity directly from the intersection theory expressions, and show that they satisfy a Mirzakhani-type recursion relation. We show detailed agreement with the known matrix quantum mechanics results, providing strong evidence for the triality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the perturbative S-matrix of the c=1 string admits a description as a double-scaled (0+0)-dimensional matrix integral with spectral curve x(z)=2√2 cos(z), y(z)=sin(z). Starting from intersection-number formulas for the complex Liouville string, it derives closed-form Feynman rules for c=1 amplitudes, proves perturbative unitarity directly from the intersection expressions, establishes a Mirzakhani-type recursion, and reports detailed numerical agreement with matrix quantum mechanics results. Physical Lorentzian S-matrix elements are recovered by restricting the discretized (modulo-1 momentum) intersection numbers to the first Brillouin zone followed by analytic continuation.

Significance. If the Brillouin-zone restriction and analytic-continuation map is shown to preserve the correct pole structure and residues, the result would be significant: it supplies a new matrix-integral formulation for c=1 string amplitudes, closes a triality with the worldsheet and matrix-quantum-mechanics descriptions, and furnishes closed-form Feynman rules together with a direct intersection-theoretic proof of perturbative unitarity. These features would constitute a concrete advance in the computational toolkit for non-critical strings.

major comments (2)
  1. [the section deriving the physical S-matrix from intersection numbers] The central step that recovers physical Lorentzian S-matrix elements from the discretized intersection-number expressions (via restriction to the first Brillouin zone and analytic continuation) is load-bearing for the triality claim yet receives only schematic justification. It is not demonstrated that this map unambiguously preserves the locations and residues of all poles that appear in the known matrix-quantum-mechanics results; a concrete check for at least the four-point amplitude would be required.
  2. [the section reporting numerical agreement with matrix quantum mechanics] The assertion of 'detailed agreement' with matrix quantum mechanics is stated in the abstract and introduction but is not accompanied by an explicit table or equation-by-equation comparison of the first few amplitudes (e.g., the two- and four-point functions) that would allow the reader to verify that the continued intersection numbers reproduce the known residues and imaginary parts.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the spectral curve variables x(z) and y(z) is introduced without an immediate reminder of the standard double-scaling conventions used in the matrix-model literature; a brief comparison sentence would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and explicit checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central step that recovers physical Lorentzian S-matrix elements from the discretized intersection-number expressions (via restriction to the first Brillouin zone and analytic continuation) is load-bearing for the triality claim yet receives only schematic justification. It is not demonstrated that this map unambiguously preserves the locations and residues of all poles that appear in the known matrix-quantum-mechanics results; a concrete check for at least the four-point amplitude would be required.

    Authors: We agree that the current justification for the Brillouin-zone restriction followed by analytic continuation is schematic and requires strengthening to rigorously support the triality. In the revised version we will expand this section with a step-by-step derivation showing how the map acts on the momentum labels and preserves the pole locations and residues of the matrix-quantum-mechanics amplitudes. We will also include an explicit four-point computation that verifies the continued intersection numbers reproduce the known poles, residues, and imaginary parts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assertion of 'detailed agreement' with matrix quantum mechanics is stated in the abstract and introduction but is not accompanied by an explicit table or equation-by-equation comparison of the first few amplitudes (e.g., the two- and four-point functions) that would allow the reader to verify that the continued intersection numbers reproduce the known residues and imaginary parts.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript currently states agreement without providing the explicit numerical or symbolic comparisons needed for verification. We will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) containing side-by-side expressions and a table for the two- and four-point amplitudes, showing the intersection-number results after Brillouin-zone restriction and analytic continuation against the known matrix-quantum-mechanics formulas, with explicit matching of residues and imaginary parts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from intersection theory

full rationale

The paper begins with established intersection-number formulas from the complex Liouville string (external to this work), derives closed-form Feynman rules for c=1 amplitudes as intersection numbers on moduli space, applies a Brillouin-zone restriction plus analytic continuation to obtain physical Lorentzian S-matrix elements, proves perturbative unitarity directly from those intersection expressions, verifies a Mirzakhani recursion, and reports numerical agreement with independent matrix-quantum-mechanics results. The matrix-integral formulation with spectral curve x(z)=2√2 cos(z), y(z)=sin(z) is then shown to reproduce the same continued amplitudes, establishing the triality as an equivalence rather than a redefinition. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing claim rests solely on self-citation chains. The restriction/continuation map is an explicit additional step whose validity is supported by unitarity proofs and MQM matching, not assumed tautologically.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard framework of intersection theory on moduli spaces and the known duality to matrix quantum mechanics; the new element is the identification with the double-scaled matrix integral.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Intersection numbers on the moduli space of Riemann surfaces compute the amplitudes corresponding to a discretized target space with momentum conserved modulo an integer.
    Invoked to obtain the closed-form Feynman rules for the c=1 amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Restriction to the first Brillouin zone plus analytic continuation to Lorentzian kinematics recovers the physical S-matrix.
    Required to connect the intersection-number expressions to the physical amplitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1503 out tokens · 55546 ms · 2026-05-10T18:50:01.303301+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Super Virasoro Minimal String from 3d Supergravity

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The super Virasoro minimal string arises from quantizing 3d supergravity, with 0A+ and 0B+ dual to the bosonic minimal string matrix integral, 0B- to one with inverse square root singularity, and 0A- having vanishing ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    I. R. Klebanov,String theory in two-dimensions, inSpring School on String Theory and Quantum Gravity (to be followed by Workshop) Trieste, Italy, April 15-23, 1991, pp. 30–101, 1991,hep-th/9108019

    work page Pith review arXiv 1991

  2. [2]

    P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore,Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles Boulder, Colorado, June 3-28, 1992, pp. 277–469, 1993,hep-th/9304011

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1992

  3. [3]

    Jevicki,Development in 2-d string theory, inWorkshop on String Theory, Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity Trieste, Italy, April 28-29, 1993, pp

    A. Jevicki,Development in 2-d string theory, inWorkshop on String Theory, Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity Trieste, Italy, April 28-29, 1993, pp. 96–140, 1993, hep-th/9309115

    work page arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    J. Polchinski,What is string theory?, inNATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Summer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory Les Houches, France, August 2-September 9, 1994, 1994,hep-th/9411028

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    Brezin and V

    E. Brezin and V. A. Kazakov,Exactly Solvable Field Theories of Closed Strings, Phys. Lett. B236(1990) 144. – 72 –

    1990

  6. [6]

    M. R. Douglas and S. H. Shenker,Strings in Less Than One-Dimension,Nucl. Phys. B335(1990) 635

    1990

  7. [7]

    D. J. Gross and A. A. Migdal,Nonperturbative Two-Dimensional Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 127

    1990

  8. [8]

    D. J. Gross and A. A. Migdal,A Nonperturbative Treatment of Two-dimensional Quantum Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B340(1990) 333

    1990

  9. [9]

    D. J. Gross and N. Miljkovic,A Nonperturbative Solution ofD= 1String Theory, Phys. Lett. B238(1990) 217

    1990

  10. [10]

    Brezin, V

    E. Brezin, V. A. Kazakov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Scaling Violation in a Field Theory of Closed Strings in One Physical Dimension,Nucl. Phys. B338(1990) 673

    1990

  11. [11]

    P. H. Ginsparg and J. Zinn-Justin,2-d GRAVITY + 1-d MATTER,Phys. Lett. B 240(1990) 333

    1990

  12. [12]

    D. J. Gross and I. R. Klebanov,Fermionic string field theory of c = 1 two-dimensional quantum gravity,Nucl. Phys. B352(1991) 671

    1991

  13. [13]

    S. R. Das and A. Jevicki,String Field Theory and Physical Interpretation ofD= 1 Strings,Mod. Phys. Lett. A5(1990) 1639

    1990

  14. [14]

    Polchinski,Classical limit of (1+1)-dimensional string theory,Nucl

    J. Polchinski,Classical limit of (1+1)-dimensional string theory,Nucl. Phys. B362 (1991) 125

    1991

  15. [15]

    G. W. Moore and R. Plesser,Classical scattering in (1+1)-dimensional string theory,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 1730 [hep-th/9203060]

    work page arXiv 1992

  16. [16]

    Natsuume and J

    M. Natsuume and J. Polchinski,Gravitational scattering in the c = 1 matrix model, Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 137 [hep-th/9402156]

    work page arXiv 1994

  17. [17]

    G. W. Moore, M. R. Plesser and S. Ramgoolam,Exact S matrix for 2-D string theory,Nucl. Phys. B377(1992) 143 [hep-th/9111035]

    work page arXiv 1992

  18. [18]

    McGreevy and H.L

    J. McGreevy and H. L. Verlinde,Strings from tachyons: The c=1 matrix reloaded, JHEP12(2003) 054 [hep-th/0304224]

    work page arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    I. R. Klebanov, J. M. Maldacena and N. Seiberg,D-brane decay in two-dimensional string theory,JHEP07(2003) 045 [hep-th/0305159]

    work page arXiv 2003

  20. [20]

    M. R. Douglas, I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, J. M. Maldacena, E. J. Martinec and N. Seiberg,A New hat for the c=1 matrix model, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1758–1827, 7, 2003,hep-th/0307195

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2003

  21. [21]

    A Matrix Model Dual of Type 0B String Theory in Two Dimensions

    T. Takayanagi and N. Toumbas,A Matrix model dual of type 0B string theory in two-dimensions,JHEP07(2003) 064 [hep-th/0307083]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  22. [22]

    S. Y. Alexandrov, V. A. Kazakov and D. Kutasov,Nonperturbative effects in matrix models and D-branes,JHEP09(2003) 057 [hep-th/0306177]

    work page arXiv 2003

  23. [23]

    Alexandrov,(m,n) ZZ branes and the c = 1 matrix model,Phys

    S. Alexandrov,(m,n) ZZ branes and the c = 1 matrix model,Phys. Lett. B604 (2004) 115 [hep-th/0310135]. – 73 –

    work page arXiv 2004

  24. [24]

    Alexandrov,D-branes and complex curves in c=1 string theory,JHEP05(2004) 025 [hep-th/0403116]

    S. Alexandrov,D-branes and complex curves in c=1 string theory,JHEP05(2004) 025 [hep-th/0403116]

    work page arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    Alexandrov,Complex curves and non-perturbative effects in c = 1 string theory, Fortsch

    S. Alexandrov,Complex curves and non-perturbative effects in c = 1 string theory, Fortsch. Phys.53(2005) 839 [hep-th/0412257]

    work page arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    J. M. Maldacena,Long strings in two dimensional string theory and non-singlets in the matrix model,JHEP09(2005) 078 [hep-th/0503112]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  27. [27]

    Solving the eigenvalue problem arising from the adjoint sector of the c=1 matrix model

    L. Fidkowski,Solving the eigenvalue problem arising from the adjoint sector of the c=1 matrix model,hep-th/0506132

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  28. [28]

    E. J. Martinec,Matrix models and 2D string theory, in9th Frontiers of Mathematical Physics Summer School on Strings, Gravity and Cosmology Vancouver, Canada, August 2-13, 2004, pp. 403–457, 2004,hep-th/0410136

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004

  29. [29]

    J. L. Karczmarek and A. Strominger,Matrix cosmology,JHEP04(2004) 055 [hep-th/0309138]

    work page arXiv 2004

  30. [30]

    J. L. Karczmarek and A. Strominger,Closed string tachyon condensation at c = 1, JHEP05(2004) 062 [hep-th/0403169]

    work page arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    Balthazar, V

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin,Thec= 1string theory S-matrix revisited,JHEP04(2019) 145 [1705.07151]

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Balthazar, V

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin,ZZ instantons and the non-perturbative dual of c = 1 string theory,JHEP05(2023) 048 [1907.07688]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Balthazar, V

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin,Multi-instanton calculus in c = 1 string theory,JHEP05(2023) 050 [1912.07170]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Sen,Fixing an Ambiguity in Two Dimensional String Theory Using String Field Theory,JHEP03(2020) 005 [1908.02782]

    A. Sen,Fixing an Ambiguity in Two Dimensional String Theory Using String Field Theory,JHEP03(2020) 005 [1908.02782]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Sen,D-instanton Perturbation Theory,JHEP08(2020) 075, [2002.04043]

    A. Sen,D-instanton Perturbation Theory,JHEP08(2020) 075 [2002.04043]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Sen,D-instantons, string field theory and two dimensional string theory,JHEP11 (2021) 061, [2012.11624]

    A. Sen,D-instantons, string field theory and two dimensional string theory,JHEP 11(2021) 061 [2012.11624]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    D. S. Eniceicu, R. Mahajan, P. Maity, C. Murdia and A. Sen,The ZZ annulus one-point function in non-critical string theory: A string field theory analysis, JHEP12(2022) 151 [2210.11473]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 347 [math-ph/0702045]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral, 1903.11115

    work page Pith review arXiv 1903

  40. [40]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. Mühlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The Virasoro minimal string,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 057 [2309.10846]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. Mühlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,Complex Liouville String,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 251602 [2409.17246]. – 74 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. Mühlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The complex Liouville string: The worldsheet,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 033 [2409.18759]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Khromov and A

    D. Khromov and A. Litvinov,On correlation numbersV0,4 andV 1,1 in Virasoro Minimal String Theory,2509.25960

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. Mühlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The complex Liouville string: The matrix integral,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 154 [2410.07345]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Goulian and M

    M. Goulian and M. Li,Correlation functions in Liouville theory,Phys. Rev. Lett. 66(1991) 2051

    1991

  46. [46]

    Teschner,Liouville theory revisited,Class

    J. Teschner,Liouville theory revisited,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) R153 [hep-th/0104158]

    work page arXiv 2001

  47. [47]

    Witten,The Feynmaniϵin String Theory,JHEP04(2015) 055 [1307.5124]

    E. Witten,The Feynmaniϵin String Theory,JHEP04(2015) 055 [1307.5124]

    work page arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Eberhardt and S

    L. Eberhardt and S. Mizera,Unitarity cuts of the worldsheet,SciPost Phys.14 (2023) 015 [2208.12233]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    H. S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,What is the iεfor the S-matrix?, SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer, 1, 2023, 10.1007/978-3-031-18258-7, [2204.02988]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18258-7 2023

  50. [50]

    Eynard,Large N expansion of the 2 matrix model,JHEP01(2003) 051 [hep-th/0210047]

    B. Eynard,Large N expansion of the 2 matrix model,JHEP01(2003) 051 [hep-th/0210047]

    work page arXiv 2003

  51. [51]

    Chekhov, B

    L. Chekhov, B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Free energy topological expansion for the 2-matrix model,JHEP12(2006) 053 [math-ph/0603003]

    work page arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    Mirzakhani,Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces,Invent

    M. Mirzakhani,Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces,Invent. Math.167(2006) 179

    2006

  53. [53]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Manin,Gromov-Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry,Commun. Math. Phys.164(1994) 525 [hep-th/9402147]

    work page arXiv 1994

  54. [54]

    Eynard,Master loop equations, free energy and correlations for the chain of matrices,JHEP11(2003) 018 [hep-th/0309036]

    B. Eynard,Master loop equations, free energy and correlations for the chain of matrices,JHEP11(2003) 018 [hep-th/0309036]

    work page arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Eynard and A

    B. Eynard and A. P. Ferrer,Topological expansion of the chain of matrices,JHEP 07(2009) 096 [0805.1368]

    work page arXiv 2009

  56. [56]

    D’Hoker and D

    E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong,The Box graph in superstring theory,Nucl. Phys. B 440(1995) 24 [hep-th/9410152]

    work page arXiv 1995

  57. [57]

    Ribault and R

    S. Ribault and R. Santachiara,Liouville theory with a central charge less than one, JHEP08(2015) 109 [1503.02067]

    work page arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Eberhardt and S

    L. Eberhardt and S. Mizera,Evaluating one-loop string amplitudes,SciPost Phys. 15(2023) 119 [2302.12733]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Eberhardt and S

    L. Eberhardt and S. Mizera,Lorentzian contours for tree-level string amplitudes, SciPost Phys.17(2024) 078 [2403.07051]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Figueiredo and M

    C. Figueiredo and M. Skowronek,Cuts and contours,JHEP12(2025) 024 [2506.05456]. – 75 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    M. M. Baccianti, L. Eberhardt and S. Mizera,One-loop four-graviton string amplitude at finiteα′,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 052 [2507.22105]

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Integrals over moduli spaces, ground ring, and four-point function in minimal Liouville gravity,Theor. Math. Phys.147 (2006) 729

    2006

  63. [63]

    Di Francesco and D

    P. Di Francesco and D. Kutasov,Correlation functions in 2-D string theory,Phys. Lett. B261(1991) 385

    1991

  64. [64]

    Di Francesco and D

    P. Di Francesco and D. Kutasov,World sheet and space-time physics in two-dimensional (Super)string theory,Nucl. Phys. B375(1992) 119 [hep-th/9109005]

    work page arXiv 1992

  65. [65]

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri,Strings inAdS3 and theSL(2,R)WZW model. Part 3. Correlation functions,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 106006 [hep-th/0111180]

    work page arXiv 2002

  66. [66]

    Erbin, J

    H. Erbin, J. Maldacena and D. Skliros,Two-Point String Amplitudes,JHEP07 (2019) 139 [1906.06051]

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Hassett,Moduli spaces of weighted pointed stable curves,Adv

    B. Hassett,Moduli spaces of weighted pointed stable curves,Adv. Math.173(2003) 316

    2003

  68. [68]

    Eberhardt and G

    L. Eberhardt and G. J. Turiaci,2D Dilaton Gravity and the Weil–Petersson Volumes with Conical Defects,Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024) 103 [2304.14948]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Artemev and I

    A. Artemev and I. Chaban,(2,2p+ 1)minimal string and intersection theory I, 2403.02305

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Delecroix, J

    V. Delecroix, J. Schmitt and J. van Zelm,admcycles – a Sage package for calculations in the tautological ring of the moduli space of stable curves,J. Softw. Alg. Geom.11(2021) 89 [2002.01709]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Sen,Cutkosky rules and unitarity (violation) in D-instanton amplitudes,JHEP 07(2021) 205 [2012.00041]

    A. Sen,Cutkosky rules and unitarity (violation) in D-instanton amplitudes,JHEP 07(2021) 205 [2012.00041]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Combinatorics of gauge fields,Nucl. Phys. B50 (1972) 318

    1972

  73. [73]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,DIAGRAMMAR,NATO Sci. Ser. B4(1974) 177

    1974

  74. [74]

    H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz and C. Vergu,Constraints on sequential discontinuities from the geometry of on-shell spaces,JHEP07(2023) 236 [2211.07633]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Fulton,Intersection Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete

    W. Fulton,Intersection Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer, 1998, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1700-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1700-8 1998

  76. [76]

    T. J. Jarvis,Geometry of the moduli of higher spin curves,International Journal of Mathematics11(2000) 637 [https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X00000325]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129167x00000325 2000

  77. [77]

    Chiodo,Stable twisted curves and theirr-spin structures,Annales de l’Institut Fourier58(2008) 1635

    A. Chiodo,Stable twisted curves and theirr-spin structures,Annales de l’Institut Fourier58(2008) 1635. – 76 –

    2008

  78. [78]

    Lewanski, A

    D. Lewanski, A. Popolitov, S. Shadrin and D. Zvonkine,Chiodo formulas for the r-th roots and topological recursion,Letters in Mathematical Physics107(2017) 901

    2017

  79. [79]

    Dunin-Barkowski, N

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, N. Orantin, S. Shadrin and L. Spitz,Identification of the Givental formula with the spectral curve topological recursion procedure,Commun. Math. Phys.328(2014) 669 [1211.4021]

    work page arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    A. B. Givental,Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus,Int. Math. Res. Not.2001(2001) 1265 [math/0008067]

    work page arXiv 2001

Showing first 80 references.