arxiv: 2604.06326 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Exotic Higgs Decays at a Muon Collider

JiJi Fan , Lingfeng Li , Tao Liu , Yanhan Wang , Mingrui Zhou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords exotic Higgs decaysmuon collidersinglet scalarbranching ratio sensitivityHiggs portal model4b final state2b2mu channelmachine learning

0 comments

The pith

A muon collider can probe exotic Higgs decays to light scalars with branching ratios as low as 10^{-3} at 10 TeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the sensitivity of a future muon collider to Higgs boson decays into pairs of light singlet scalars that then decay to Standard Model particles. It focuses on the four-bottom-quark and two-bottom two-muon final states, using machine learning to control backgrounds and jet pairing issues at benchmark energies of 3 TeV and 10 TeV. The analysis shows that these channels can reach branching-ratio sensitivities of order 10^{-2} to 10^{-3} for the 4b mode and even lower for the 2b2μ mode, which would improve on high-luminosity LHC projections and allow tests of simple Higgs-portal models. This reach matters because it targets potential new light degrees of freedom that mix weakly with the Higgs and might otherwise remain hidden at hadron colliders.

Core claim

In a minimal Standard Model extension with a light singlet scalar S, the muon collider at 3 TeV with 1 ab^{-1} and at 10 TeV with 10 ab^{-1} can achieve sensitivity to BR(h to SS to 4b) of order 10^{-2} and 10^{-3} respectively by applying machine-learning techniques to suppress backgrounds and mitigate jet combinatorics in the 4b and 2b2μ channels. In the Higgs-portal scenario where S couples to the Standard Model only through mixing with the Higgs, the sensitivity to BR(h to SS) remains comparable when S decays predominantly to b quarks. The 2b2μ final state benefits from a clean dimuon resonance and can reach BR(h to SS to 2b2μ) down to 10^{-5} at 10 TeV, although the corresponding reach,

What carries the argument

Machine-learning techniques applied to suppress backgrounds and mitigate jet-combinatorics effects in the 4b and 2b2μ final states from h to SS decays.

If this is right

The 4b channel at 10 TeV improves sensitivity to BR(h to SS to 4b) by roughly an order of magnitude over high-luminosity LHC projections.
In Higgs-portal models the reach for BR(h to SS) remains at the same level as long as S decays mostly to b quarks with order-one branching fraction.
The 2b2μ channel provides a complementary probe that reaches BR(h to SS to 2b2μ) of 10^{-5} thanks to the clean dimuon resonance signature.
These projections assume the stated luminosities and center-of-mass energies are achieved at the muon collider.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If realized, these sensitivities would exclude larger regions of parameter space for light scalar extensions than current or near-term hadron-collider searches.
Extending the same machine-learning approach to other S decay modes such as tau pairs or photons could broaden the coverage of possible new-physics signatures.
The reliance on simulation-based machine-learning performance suggests that data-driven background estimation techniques would be needed to confirm the projections once real data are collected.

Load-bearing premise

Machine learning will suppress backgrounds and resolve jet combinatorics at the efficiencies assumed in the simulation without large unaccounted systematic uncertainties.

What would settle it

A full detector simulation or data-driven validation showing that the background rejection power after machine learning is at least a factor of ten worse than projected would invalidate the claimed sensitivities.

read the original abstract

We study the sensitivity of a future muon collider to exotic Higgs decays in a minimal scenario of Standard Model (SM) augmented with a light singlet scalar $S$. We consider the decay $h\to SS$ and $S$'s subsequently decay back to SM. In particular, we focus on final states with four bottom quarks ($4b$), or two bottom quarks and two muons ($2b2\mu$). Analyses are performed for two muon collider benchmark configurations: center-of-mass collision energy $\sqrt{s}=3~\mathrm{TeV}$ with $1~\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ data and $\sqrt{s}=10~\mathrm{TeV}$ with $10~\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ data. Machine-learning techniques are applied to suppress backgrounds and mitigate jet-combinatorics effects in both channels. We find that the $4b$ mode could be sensitive to the branching ratio, BR$(h \to SS \to 4b)$, of ${\cal O}(10^{-2})$ at 3 TeV and ${\cal O}(10^{-3})$ at 10 TeV, significantly improving upon high-luminosity LHC projections. In the Higgs-portal model with $S$ coupling to SM only through mixing with the Higgs, the sensitivities to BR$(h \to SS)$ remain at the same level given ${\cal O}(1)$ branching fraction of $S$ decaying into $b$-quarks. The $2b2\mu$ mode benefits from a clean dimuon resonance and can probe BR$(h\to SS\to 2b2\mu)$ down to $10^{-5}$ level at a 10 TeV muon collider. But the sensitivity to BR$(h \to SS)$ will be significantly reduced due to the small branching fraction of $S$ decaying into muons in the Higgs portal model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Muon collider projections for h to SS in 4b and 2b2mu look promising on paper but rest on unvalidated ML background rejection that could easily weaken the claimed gains over HL-LHC.

read the letter

The core result is that a 10 TeV muon collider with 10 ab^{-1} could reach BR(h to SS to 4b) around 10^{-3} and BR(h to SS to 2b2mu) down to 10^{-5}, using ML to handle backgrounds and jet combinatorics. These numbers are new for the muon collider benchmarks and do extend the existing LHC sensitivity studies in a direct way. The authors run standard Monte Carlo for signal and SM backgrounds at the two energies, then apply classifiers to suppress backgrounds while keeping signal efficiency reasonable. That approach is straightforward and addresses the main experimental challenges in the 4b channel. Credit is due for focusing on both the 4b and 2b2mu modes and for noting how the Higgs-portal branching ratios affect the overall reach to the mixing angle. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test: the ML performance is described at a high level with no training details, ROC curves, or studies of systematic effects such as b-tagging efficiency, beam-induced backgrounds, or jet energy scale. If the real rejection power falls short by even a modest factor, the improvement over HL-LHC projections shrinks or disappears. The paper does not appear to include those robustness checks. This work is aimed at collider phenomenologists and muon collider planning groups who need ballpark reaches for exotic Higgs decays. A reader already familiar with LHC projections will find the comparison useful, but anyone planning to use the numbers for model building should rerun the analysis with full systematics. The calculations are clear enough and the topic timely enough that it deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review and ask specifically for the ML validation material and a systematic uncertainty breakdown before publication.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sensitivity of a future muon collider to exotic Higgs decays h → SS (S a light singlet scalar) in a minimal SM extension, focusing on the 4b and 2b2μ final states. Monte Carlo simulations and machine-learning classifiers are used to suppress SM backgrounds and resolve jet combinatorics for benchmark runs at √s = 3 TeV (1 ab⁻¹) and √s = 10 TeV (10 ab⁻¹). The central claims are that the 4b channel can reach BR(h → SS → 4b) ∼ O(10^{-2}) at 3 TeV and O(10^{-3}) at 10 TeV (improving on HL-LHC projections), while the 2b2μ channel can probe BR(h → SS → 2b2μ) down to 10^{-5} at 10 TeV, though the latter is limited in the Higgs-portal model by small S → μμ branching fractions.

Significance. If the projected reaches are robust, the work would establish muon colliders as powerful probes of light scalar extensions via exotic Higgs decays, leveraging a clean environment to achieve substantial gains over HL-LHC in channels with complex jet combinatorics. The forward-simulation approach for projections is a strength, but the results hinge on unvalidated ML performance.

major comments (3)

[4b analysis and results] Analysis of the 4b final state (as summarized in the abstract and results): the quoted sensitivities BR(h → SS → 4b) = O(10^{-2}) at 3 TeV and O(10^{-3}) at 10 TeV are obtained after ML-based background suppression and jet pairing; however, no ROC curves, training/validation splits, efficiency-vs-rejection metrics, or studies of systematic variations (b-tagging, beam-induced backgrounds, detector effects) are provided. This directly undermines the claimed improvement over HL-LHC projections.
[Machine learning techniques] Machine-learning techniques section: the manuscript applies ML classifiers to mitigate backgrounds and combinatorics in both channels but supplies only high-level descriptions without error bars on the projected reaches, full background modeling details, or validation that the assumed rejection factors survive realistic uncertainties. If the effective background rejection is lower by a factor of a few, the headline sensitivities disappear.
[Higgs-portal model and 2b2μ results] Higgs-portal model discussion: the reduction in sensitivity for BR(h → SS) in the 2b2μ mode due to small S → μμ branching fractions is noted, but no quantitative scan over the mixing angle or explicit comparison tables versus the 4b mode are given to support the statement that 4b sensitivities 'remain at the same level'.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Notation: the symbol 𝒪(10^{-2}) is used without explicit definition in the abstract; a brief clarification in the text would aid readability.
[Introduction] References: several prior muon-collider studies on Higgs physics are cited at high level; adding a short comparison table of projected reaches would strengthen context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments provided. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the necessary additions and clarifications in a revised version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [4b analysis and results] Analysis of the 4b final state (as summarized in the abstract and results): the quoted sensitivities BR(h → SS → 4b) = O(10^{-2}) at 3 TeV and O(10^{-3}) at 10 TeV are obtained after ML-based background suppression and jet pairing; however, no ROC curves, training/validation splits, efficiency-vs-rejection metrics, or studies of systematic variations (b-tagging, beam-induced backgrounds, detector effects) are provided. This directly undermines the claimed improvement over HL-LHC projections.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for more detailed validation of the ML classifiers used in the 4b analysis. The manuscript currently emphasizes the final sensitivity results. In the revised version, we will include ROC curves, details on the training and validation data splits, efficiency-versus-rejection metrics, and an assessment of systematic uncertainties including b-tagging performance, beam-induced backgrounds, and detector effects. These additions will provide a more complete picture of the analysis and support the claimed improvements over HL-LHC projections. revision: yes
Referee: [Machine learning techniques] Machine-learning techniques section: the manuscript applies ML classifiers to mitigate backgrounds and combinatorics in both channels but supplies only high-level descriptions without error bars on the projected reaches, full background modeling details, or validation that the assumed rejection factors survive realistic uncertainties. If the effective background rejection is lower by a factor of a few, the headline sensitivities disappear.

Authors: We agree that additional information on the ML performance is required to fully substantiate our results. We will revise the Machine Learning Techniques section to include error bars on the projected reaches, more comprehensive background modeling details, and validation studies showing the stability of the background rejection factors under realistic uncertainties. This will demonstrate that the sensitivities are robust. revision: yes
Referee: [Higgs-portal model and 2b2μ results] Higgs-portal model discussion: the reduction in sensitivity for BR(h → SS) in the 2b2μ mode due to small S → μμ branching fractions is noted, but no quantitative scan over the mixing angle or explicit comparison tables versus the 4b mode are given to support the statement that 4b sensitivities 'remain at the same level'.

Authors: The statement in the manuscript is based on the expectation that for mixing angles where BR(S → bb) is O(1), the 4b channel sensitivity to BR(h → SS) is not significantly affected. To provide a more quantitative support, we will add a comparison table or plot in the revised manuscript that shows the projected sensitivities for both channels as a function of the Higgs-singlet mixing angle. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: sensitivity projections derived from independent Monte Carlo simulation chain

full rationale

The paper performs forward simulation of signal (h→SS→4b or 2b2μ) and SM background events at specified muon-collider energies and luminosities, then applies ML classifiers for background rejection and jet combinatorics. The quoted BR sensitivities (O(10^{-2}) at 3 TeV, O(10^{-3}) at 10 TeV for 4b) are outputs of this simulation pipeline, not inputs fitted to data or redefined by the result itself. No self-definitional equations, no parameter fitted to a subset and then called a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to an unverified prior result by the same authors. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks (HL-LHC projections) and does not collapse by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the minimal SM+S extension and the accuracy of future-collider simulations; no independent evidence is given for the new scalar.

free parameters (1)

Higgs-singlet mixing angle
Controls BR(h to SS) and is scanned to determine sensitivity reach.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard Model plus one light singlet scalar is the only new physics present
Minimal scenario assumption invoked throughout the sensitivity study.
domain assumption Detector response and background rates at future muon colliders can be modeled accurately
Required for all projection studies of this type.

invented entities (1)

Light singlet scalar S no independent evidence
purpose: To mediate the exotic decay h to SS
Postulated new particle in the minimal extension; no independent evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5640 in / 1282 out tokens · 52047 ms · 2026-05-10T18:51:36.175624+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Shrock and M

R.E. Shrock and M. Suzuki,Invisible Decays of Higgs Bosons,Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 250

1982
[2]

Curtin et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson,Phys

D. Curtin et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 075004 [1312.4992]

work page arXiv 2014
[3]

Cepeda, S

M. Cepeda, S. Gori, V.M. Outschoorn and J. Shelton,Exotic Higgs Decays,2111.12751

work page arXiv
[4]

Forslund and P

M. Forslund and P. Meade,High precision higgs from high energy muon colliders,JHEP08 (2022) 185 [2203.09425]. – 17 – mS 15 GeV 20 GeV 30 GeV 40 GeV 50 GeV 60 GeV Signal h→SS→4b≤2.5×10 2BR2.4×10 3BR1.1×10 4BR1.3×10 4BR8.1×10 3BR1.3×10 4BR Background h→ZZ∗ →4b0.19 0.29 4.3 7.0 7.0 16.5 h→4b0.053 0.053 0.87 2.9 2.3 1.7 2b≤0.76≤0.76≤0.76≤0.76≤0.76≤0.76 4b≤0.4...

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

de Blas, J

J. de Blas, J. Gu and Z. Liu,Higgs boson precision measurements at a 125 GeV muon collider,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 073007 [2203.04324]

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

Forslund and P

M. Forslund and P. Meade,Precision Higgs width and couplings with a high energy muon collider,JHEP01(2024) 182 [2308.02633]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

P. Li, Z. Liu and K.-F. Lyu,Higgs boson width and couplings at high energy muon colliders with forward muon detection,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 073009 [2401.08756]

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

J. Chen, T. Li, C.-T. Lu, Y. Wu and C.-Y. Yao,Measurement of Higgs boson self-couplings through 2→3 vector bosons scattering in future muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 053009 [2112.12507]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

Chen and D

M. Chen and D. Liu,Top Yukawa coupling measurement at the muon collider,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 075020 [2212.11067]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

Celada, T

E. Celada, T. Han, W. Kilian, N. Kreher, Y. Ma, F. Maltoni et al.,Probing Higgs-muon interactions at a multi-TeV muon collider,JHEP08(2024) 021 [2312.13082]

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Azatov, F

A. Azatov, F. Garosi, A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, J. Salko and S. Trifinopoulos,New physics in b→sµµ: FCC-hh or a muon collider?,JHEP10(2022) 149 [2205.13552]

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Yang, Z.-B

J.-C. Yang, Z.-B. Qing, X.-Y. Han, Y.-C. Guo and T. Li,Tri-photon at muon collider: a new process to probe the anomalous quartic gauge couplings,JHEP22(2020) 053 [2204.08195]

work page arXiv 2020
[13]

Yang, X.-Y

J.-C. Yang, X.-Y. Han, Z.-B. Qin, T. Li and Y.-C. Guo,Measuring the anomalous quartic gauge couplings in the W+W- to W+W- process at muon collider using artificial neural networks,JHEP09(2022) 074 [2204.10034]

work page arXiv 2022
[14]

Fridell, R

K. Fridell, R. Kitano and R. Takai,Lepton flavor physics atµ+µ+ colliders,JHEP06 (2023) 086 [2304.14020]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Y. Ma, D. Pagani and M. Zaro,EW corrections and heavy boson radiation at a high-energy muon collider,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 053002 [2409.09129]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Dong, Y.-C

Y.-F. Dong, Y.-C. Mao, i.-C. Yang and J.-C. Yang,Searching for anomalous quartic gauge couplings at muon colliders using principal component analysis,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 555 [2304.01505]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Altmannshofer, S.A

W. Altmannshofer, S.A. Gadam and S. Profumo,Snowmass White Paper: Probing New Physics withµ +µ− →bsat a Muon Collider, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07495]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

Zhang, J.-C

S. Zhang, J.-C. Yang and Y.-C. Guo,Using k-means assistant event selection strategy to study anomalous quartic gauge couplings at muon colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 142 [2302.01274]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

T. Han, D. Liu, I. Low and X. Wang,Electroweak scattering at the muon shot,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 013005 [2312.07670]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Zhang, X.-T

Y.-T. Zhang, X.-T. Wang and J.-C. Yang,Searching for gluon quartic gauge couplings at muon colliders using the autoencoder,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 095028 [2311.16627]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

T. Han, D. Liu and S. Wang,Top quark electroweak dipole moment at a high energy muon collider,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 035015 [2410.11015]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Liu, K.-P

W. Liu, K.-P. Xie and Z. Yi,Testing leptogenesis at the LHC and future muon colliders: A Z’ scenario,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 095034 [2109.15087]. – 19 –

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

P. Li, Z. Liu and K.-F. Lyu,Heavy neutral leptons at muon colliders,JHEP03(2023) 231 [2301.07117]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

T.H. Kwok, L. Li, T. Liu and A. Rock,Searching for heavy neutral leptons at a future muon collider,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 075009 [2301.05177]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

S. Chen, A. Glioti, R. Rattazzi, L. Ricci and A. Wulzer,Learning from radiation at a very high energy lepton collider,JHEP05(2022) 180 [2202.10509]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Cesarotti, S

C. Cesarotti, S. Homiller, R.K. Mishra and M. Reece,Probing New Gauge Forces with a High-Energy Muon Beam Dump,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 071803 [2202.12302]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

Y. Bao, J. Fan and L. Li,Electroweak ALP searches at a muon collider,JHEP08(2022) 276 [2203.04328]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

T. Li, M.A. Schmidt, C.-Y. Yao and M. Yuan,Charged lepton flavor violation in light of the muon magnetic moment anomaly and colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 811 [2104.04494]

work page arXiv 2021
[29]

Dermisek, K

R. Dermisek, K. Hermanek and N. McGinnis,Di-Higgs and tri-Higgs boson signals of muon g-2 at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L091301 [2108.10950]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Homiller, Q

S. Homiller, Q. Lu and M. Reece,Complementary signals of lepton flavor violation at a high-energy muon collider,JHEP07(2022) 036 [2203.08825]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

C. Sen, P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Dutta and A. KT,Displaced Higgs production in Type-III seesaw at the LHC/FCC, MATHUSLA and muon collider,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 230 [2107.12442]

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Dasgupta, P

A. Dasgupta, P.S.B. Dev, T. Han, R. Padhan, S. Wang and K. Xie,Searching for heavy leptophilic Z’: from lepton colliders to gravitational waves,JHEP12(2023) 011 [2308.12804]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

Jueid and S

A. Jueid and S. Nasri,Lepton portal dark matter at muon colliders: Total rates and generic features for phenomenologically viable scenarios,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 115027 [2301.12524]

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

Search for lepton-flavor-violating ALPs at a future muon collider and utilization of polarization-induced effects,

G. Haghighat and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi,Search for lepton-flavor-violating ALPs at a future muon collider and utilization of polarization-induced effects,Nucl. Phys. B980 (2022) 115827 [2106.00505]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Casarsa, M

M. Casarsa, M. Fabbrichesi and E. Gabrielli,Monochromatic single photon events at the muon collider,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 075008 [2111.13220]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

Cesarotti and R

C. Cesarotti and R. Gambhir,The new physics case for beam-dump experiments with accelerated muon beams,JHEP05(2024) 283 [2310.16110]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Jueid, T.A

A. Jueid, T.A. Chowdhury, S. Nasri and S. Saad,Probing Zee-Babu states at muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075011 [2306.01255]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

A. Das, S. Mandal and S. Shil,Testing electroweak scale seesaw models at e-γandγγ colliders,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 015022 [2304.06298]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Li, C.-Y

T. Li, C.-Y. Yao and M. Yuan,Searching for heavy neutral lepton and lepton number violation through VBS at high-energy muon colliders,JHEP09(2023) 131 [2306.17368]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

Black, T

K. Black, T. Bose, Y. Chen, S. Dasu, H. Jia, D. Pinna et al.,Prospects for Heavy WIMP Dark Matter Searches at Muon Colliders, inSnowmass 2021, 5, 2022 [2205.10404]. – 20 –

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Ghosh, S.K

N. Ghosh, S.K. Rai and T. Samui,Search for a leptoquark and vector-like lepton in a muon collider,Nucl. Phys. B1004(2024) 116564 [2309.07583]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Bandyopadhyay, S

P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Parashar, C. Sen and J. Song,Probing Inert Triplet Model at a multi-TeV muon collider via vector boson fusion with forward muon tagging,JHEP07 (2024) 253 [2401.02697]

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Bandyopadhyay and S

P. Bandyopadhyay and S. Parashar,Probing a scalar singlet-triplet extension of the standard model via vector boson fusion at a muon collider,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115032 [2410.06298]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

C.-T. Lu, X. Luo and X. Wei,Exploring muonphilic ALPs at muon colliders,Chin. Phys. C 47(2023) 103102 [2303.03110]

work page arXiv 2023
[45]

Mikulenko and M

O. Mikulenko and M. Marinichenko,Measuring lepton number violation in heavy neutral lepton decays at the future muon collider,JHEP01(2024) 032 [2309.16837]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Liu, L.-T

D. Liu, L.-T. Wang and K.-P. Xie,Composite resonances at a 10 TeV muon collider,JHEP 04(2024) 084 [2312.09117]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

T. Li, H. Qin, C.-Y. Yao and M. Yuan,Probing heavy triplet leptons of the type-III seesaw mechanism at future muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 035021 [2205.04214]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Chigusa, S

S. Chigusa, S. Girmohanta, Y. Nakai and Y. Zhang,Aiming for tops of ALPs with a muon collider,JHEP01(2024) 077 [2310.11018]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Medina, N.I

A.D. Medina, N.I. Mileo, A. Szynkman and S.A. Tanco,Elusive muonic WIMP,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 075018 [2112.09103]

work page arXiv 2022
[50]

T. Han, M. Low, T.A. Wu and K. Xie,Colorful particle production at high-energy muon colliders,JHEP06(2025) 109 [2502.20443]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

T. Han, S. Li, S. Su, W. Su and Y. Wu,BSM Higgs Production at a Muon Collider, in Snowmass 2021, 5, 2022 [2205.11730]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

T. Han, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang and X. Wang,WIMP Dark Matter at High Energy Muon Colliders−A White Paper for Snowmass 2021, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07351]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

T. Han, T. Li and X. Wang,Axion-Like Particles at High Energy Muon Colliders – A White paper for Snowmass 2021, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.05484]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

T. Han, S. Li, S. Su, W. Su and Y. Wu,Heavy Higgs bosons in 2HDM at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 055029 [2102.08386]

work page arXiv 2021
[55]

Jana and S

S. Jana and S. Klett,Muonic force and nonstandard neutrino interactions at muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095011 [2308.07375]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Barducci and A

D. Barducci and A. Dondarini,Neutrino dipole portal at a high energyµ−collider,JHEP 10(2024) 165 [2404.09609]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

He, J.-Q

R.-Y. He, J.-Q. Huang, J.-Y. Xu, F.-X. Yang, Z.-L. Han and F.-L. Shao,Heavy neutral leptons in gauged U(1)(Lmu-Ltau) at muon collider,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 093102 [2401.14687]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng and Y. Liu,Distinguishing Dirac from Majorana Heavy Neutrino at Future Lepton Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 021801 [2403.06561]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Q. Bi, J. Guo, J. Liu, Y. Luo and X.-P. Wang,Long-lived sterile neutrino searches at future muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 075001 [2409.17243]. – 21 –

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

Dehghani, M

P. Dehghani, M. Frank and B. Fuks,Vector boson fusion signatures of superheavy Majorana neutrinos at muon colliders,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 035020 [2506.06159]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Illuminating degenerate dark sector of Inert Doublet Model at muon collider

A. Ghosh, P. Konar, C. Sen and B. Thacker,Illuminating Degenerate Dark Sector of Inert Doublet Model at Muon Collider,2508.06289

work page arXiv
[62]

S. Saha, A. Bhaskar, P.S.B. Dev and M. Mitra,Exploring Scalar Leptoquarks at Muon Collider via Indirect Signatures and Right-Handed Neutrino-Assisted Decays,2509.04579

work page arXiv
[63]

Chakraborty, H

I. Chakraborty, H. Roy and T. Srivastava,Searches for heavy neutrinos at multi-TeV muon collider: a resonant leptogenesis perspective,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 280 [2206.07037]

work page arXiv 2023
[64]

Coleppa and A

B. Coleppa and A. Khanna,Neutral Scalar Signatures at a Muon Collider in theZ3 symmetric Three Higgs Doublet Model,2602.17460

work page arXiv
[65]

Al Ali et al.,The muon Smasher’s guide,Rept

H. Al Ali et al.,The muon Smasher’s guide,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022) 084201 [2103.14043]

work page arXiv 2022
[66]

Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider,Eur

C. Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 864 [2303.08533]

work page arXiv 2023
[67]

Aime et al.,Muon Collider Physics Summary,2203.07256

C. Aime et al.,Muon Collider Physics Summary,2203.07256

work page arXiv
[68]

Black et al.,Muon Collider Forum report,JINST19(2024) T02015 [2209.01318]

K.M. Black et al.,Muon Collider Forum report,JINST19(2024) T02015 [2209.01318]. [69]International Muon Collidercollaboration,Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC),CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.2/2024(2024) 176 [2407.12450]

work page arXiv 2024
[69]

Acosta, E

D. Acosta, E. Barberis, N. Hurley, W. Li, O. Miguel Colin, Y. Wang et al.,The potential of a TeV-scale muon-ion collider,JINST18(2023) P09025 [2203.06258]

work page arXiv 2023
[70]

O’Connell, M

D. O’Connell, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and M.B. Wise,Minimal Extension of the Standard Model Scalar Sector,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 037701 [hep-ph/0611014]

work page arXiv 2007
[71]

Singlet Higgs Phenomenology and the Electroweak Phase Transition

S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP08(2007) 010 [0705.2425]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[72]

Curtin, R

D. Curtin, R. Essig and Y.-M. Zhong,Uncovering light scalars with exotic Higgs decays to bbµ+µ−,JHEP06(2015) 025 [1412.4779]

work page arXiv 2015
[73]

Kozaczuk, M.J

J. Kozaczuk, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Shelton,Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 115035 [1911.10210]

work page arXiv 2020
[74]

Carena, Z

M. Carena, Z. Liu and Y. Wang,Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z2-breaking, JHEP08(2020) 107 [1911.10206]

work page arXiv 2020
[75]

Shelton and D

J. Shelton and D. Xu,Exotic Higgs Decays to Four Taus at Future Electron-Positron Colliders, inSnowmass 2021, 10, 2021 [2110.13225]

work page arXiv 2021
[76]

Adhikary, S

A. Adhikary, S. Banerjee, R.K. Barman, B. Batell, B. Bhattacherjee, C. Bose et al., Prospects for exotic h→4τdecays in single and di-Higgs boson production at the LHC and future hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 055008 [2211.07674]

work page arXiv 2024
[77]

W. Liu, A. Yang and H. Sun,Shedding light on the electroweak phase transition from exotic Higgs boson decays at the lifetime frontiers,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 115040 [2205.08205]

work page arXiv 2022
[78]

Z. Wang, X. Zhu, E.E. Khoda, S.-C. Hsu, N. Konstantinidis, K. Li et al.,Study of Electroweak Phase Transition in Exotic Higgs Decays at the CEPC, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.10184]. – 22 –

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

Carena, J

M. Carena, J. Kozaczuk, Z. Liu, T. Ou, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, J. Shelton et al.,Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition with Exotic Higgs Decays,LHEP2023(2023) 432 [2203.08206]

work page arXiv 2023
[80]

Roche, B.T

S.T. Roche, B.T. Carlson, C.R. Hayes and T.M. Hong,Illuminating all-hadronic final states with a photon: Exotic decays of the Higgs boson to four bottom quarks in vector boson fusion plus gamma at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115029 [2306.01901]

work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.