Dissipative Hamilton Jacobi Dynamics and the Emergence of Quantum Wave Mechanics

Naleli Jubert Matjelo

arxiv: 2604.06455 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Dissipative Hamilton Jacobi Dynamics and the Emergence of Quantum Wave Mechanics

Naleli Jubert Matjelo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords dissipative classical mechanicsHamilton-Jacobi equationsMadelung transformSchrödinger equationsystem-environment couplingnonlinear wave equationdual sector interpretationquantum emergence

0 comments

The pith

The Schrödinger equation emerges as the symmetric equilibrium limit of a nonlinear dissipative wave equation from coupled Hamilton-Jacobi dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from a complex action principle that adds an intrinsic environment to every classical system. Splitting the action into conservative and divergence-induced parts produces two coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations for the system and its environment. A generalized Madelung transform converts these equations into a single nonlinear dissipative wave equation. When the system and environment reach a balanced symmetric state, the nonlinear equation reduces exactly to the linear Schrödinger equation, with the quantum potential and linearity arising directly from the coupling. This positions quantum mechanics as the equilibrium phase of a wider dissipative classical theory in which the wavefunction encodes interaction geometry between sectors rather than serving as a fundamental object.

Core claim

Decomposing the action into conservative and divergence-induced components yields two coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations describing a system-environment pair. Application of a generalized Madelung transform produces a nonlinear dissipative wave equation. In the symmetric equilibrium where intersector coupling is balanced, this wave equation reduces to the Schrödinger equation, with the quantum potential emerging from the coupling and linearity following without additional tuning.

What carries the argument

The generalized Madelung transform applied to the coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations obtained from the decomposition of the complex action into conservative and divergence-induced components.

If this is right

The wavefunction encodes the geometry of system-environment interactions rather than being a primitive entity.
Interference, amplitude-phase relations, and probabilistic features originate from classical dissipative coupling.
Multiple independent environment sectors can generate measurement-like processes and entanglement-type correlations.
Quantum mechanics corresponds to the stable symmetric phase of a broader dissipative classical theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This construction may link hydrodynamic and non-Hermitian approaches through an underlying action principle.
Classical simulations of the dissipative wave equation could be checked for regimes that reproduce standard quantum predictions.
Measurement and memory effects might be modeled by allowing the environment sectors to evolve independently.

Load-bearing premise

The action admits a physically valid split into conservative and divergence-induced parts such that the generalized Madelung transform produces an equilibrium state that is exactly the linear Schrödinger equation.

What would settle it

Explicit derivation of the equilibrium state from the nonlinear dissipative wave equation that yields extra nonlinear terms or fails to recover the exact linear Schrödinger equation without parameter adjustment.

read the original abstract

We develop a dissipative extension of classical mechanics based on a complex, and more generally quaternionic, action principle that endows every classical system with an intrinsic environment. Decomposing the action into conservative and divergence-induced components yields two coupled Hamilton Jacobi equations describing a dynamically intertwined system environment pair. This motivates a Dual Sector or Dual Environmental Interpretation (DSI/DEI), in which the additional degrees of freedom behave as an image sector exchanging energy, information, and phase with the system. Applying a generalized Madelung transform produces a nonlinear dissipative wave equation whose symmetric equilibrium limit reduces to the Schroedinger equation, with the quantum potential and linearity emerging from balanced intersector coupling. In this framework, the wavefunction is not fundamental but encodes the interaction geometry between system and environment, providing a classical origin for interference, amplitude phase coupling, and probabilistic structure. Extending the imaginary structure to multiple independent directions yields a multienvironment generalization capable of representing measurement-like processes, nonMarkovian memory, and entanglement type correlations. The formulation unifies aspects of dual-system models, hydrodynamic approaches, and non-Hermitian dynamics within a single action-based framework, and suggests that quantum mechanics corresponds to a stable symmetric phase of a broader dissipative classical theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper builds a quaternionic dissipative action with dual sectors that claims to recover the exact linear Schrödinger equation in equilibrium, but the central reduction steps are asserted without enough visible algebra to confirm the cancellations.

read the letter

The core idea is a classical mechanics extended by a complex or quaternionic action that splits into conservative and divergence parts. This produces two coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations for a system and an image environment. A generalized Madelung transform then yields a nonlinear dissipative wave equation whose symmetric limit is said to give back the Schrödinger equation, with the quantum potential arising from the balanced coupling. The wavefunction is treated as encoding the interaction geometry rather than being primitive. The multi-environment extension is meant to cover measurement-like processes and entanglement-type correlations. This specific packaging of quaternionic action, dual-sector interpretation, and dissipative pair is new, and the unification with hydrodynamic and non-Hermitian models is handled cleanly without overclaiming priority. The setup is internally coherent and engages the literature on open systems in a direct way. The main soft spot is exactly where the stress test flags it. The abstract and framework assert that all nonlinear and dissipative terms cancel identically in the symmetric phase to leave iħ ∂t ψ = −(ħ²/2m)∇²ψ + Vψ with no residuals. Without the explicit phase and amplitude equations and the cancellation algebra shown step by step, it is impossible to verify whether this holds exactly or whether small mismatches or implicit choices are required. That leaves a real risk that the result is closer to a construction than a strict derivation. The circularity concern is also proportionate: defining the equilibrium to recover quantum mechanics makes the emergence look built-in. The paper is aimed at foundations readers who already work on classical routes to wave mechanics or dissipative interpretations. It will be useful to them for the framework and the unification angle even if the final reduction needs more checks. I would send it to peer review. The topic is substantial enough that referees should examine the derivations in detail and test whether the claimed cancellations actually go through without extra tuning.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a dissipative extension of classical mechanics based on a complex (and quaternionic) action principle that introduces an intrinsic environment for every system. The action is decomposed into conservative and divergence-induced components, yielding two coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations for a system-image sector pair under the Dual Sector Interpretation. A generalized Madelung transform is applied to these equations to produce a nonlinear dissipative wave equation whose symmetric equilibrium limit (balanced intersector amplitudes and phases) is asserted to reduce exactly to the linear Schrödinger equation, with the quantum potential and linearity emerging automatically from the coupling. The wavefunction is reinterpreted as encoding interaction geometry rather than being fundamental, and the framework is extended to multiple independent imaginary directions to model measurement-like processes, non-Markovian memory, and entanglement-type correlations. Quantum mechanics is thereby positioned as a stable symmetric phase of a broader dissipative classical theory.

Significance. If the asserted reduction holds exactly, the work would offer a unified action-based origin for quantum features (interference, amplitude-phase coupling, probabilistic structure) from classical dissipative dynamics, integrating hydrodynamic, dual-system, and non-Hermitian perspectives without introducing free parameters. The explicit construction of an equilibrium limit that recovers linearity and the quantum potential from intersector coupling would be a notable strength, provided the cancellations are shown to be identity-level rather than approximate.

major comments (2)

The central claim that the symmetric equilibrium of the nonlinear dissipative wave equation reduces precisely to iħ ∂_t ψ = −(ħ²/2m)∇²ψ + Vψ (with quantum potential arising from balanced coupling and all dissipative/nonlinear residuals cancelling) is load-bearing. The manuscript must supply the explicit substitution of the generalized Madelung ansatz into the coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations and demonstrate term-by-term cancellation in both the amplitude and phase sectors when intersector amplitudes and phases are equal; any mismatch would leave residual nonlinear or dissipative contributions that prevent exact linearity.
The decomposition of the action into conservative and divergence-induced components is introduced as the starting point for the coupled equations and the subsequent Dual Sector Interpretation. The paper should verify that this splitting is canonical (or at least physically unique up to the desired equilibrium behavior) and does not implicitly encode the target Schrödinger structure; otherwise the emergence of the quantum potential and linearity risks being by construction rather than derived.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the quaternionic action and the multiple imaginary units should be defined explicitly at first use, including commutation relations and how the divergence-induced component is extracted.
The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief roadmap indicating where the generalized Madelung transform is performed and where the equilibrium limit is taken, to help readers locate the key derivation steps.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments highlight important points that require explicit demonstration and clarification to strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the necessary revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the symmetric equilibrium of the nonlinear dissipative wave equation reduces precisely to iħ ∂_t ψ = −(ħ²/2m)∇²ψ + Vψ (with quantum potential arising from balanced coupling and all dissipative/nonlinear residuals cancelling) is load-bearing. The manuscript must supply the explicit substitution of the generalized Madelung ansatz into the coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations and demonstrate term-by-term cancellation in both the amplitude and phase sectors when intersector amplitudes and phases are equal; any mismatch would leave residual nonlinear or dissipative contributions that prevent exact linearity.

Authors: We agree that an explicit term-by-term demonstration is essential to substantiate the exact reduction. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that performs the full substitution of the generalized Madelung ansatz into the coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Under the symmetric equilibrium conditions (equal intersector amplitudes and phases), we will show the precise cancellations in both the amplitude and phase sectors, confirming that all nonlinear and dissipative residuals vanish identically and that the quantum potential arises directly from the balanced intersector coupling. revision: yes
Referee: The decomposition of the action into conservative and divergence-induced components is introduced as the starting point for the coupled equations and the subsequent Dual Sector Interpretation. The paper should verify that this splitting is canonical (or at least physically unique up to the desired equilibrium behavior) and does not implicitly encode the target Schrödinger structure; otherwise the emergence of the quantum potential and linearity risks being by construction rather than derived.

Authors: The decomposition follows directly from separating the real (conservative) and imaginary (divergence-induced) parts of the complex action principle. To address the concern of canonicity, the revised manuscript will include an expanded discussion (with an appendix if needed) demonstrating that this splitting is the natural and unique consequence of the complex/quaternionic action within the Dual Sector Interpretation. We will clarify that the target Schrödinger structure is not presupposed; rather, the quantum potential and linearity emerge as dynamical consequences of the intersector coupling at equilibrium. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Symmetric equilibrium defined to recover Schrödinger equation by construction of the generalized Madelung transform and intersector balance

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract and section on generalized Madelung transform (implied in derivation chain)]
"Applying a generalized Madelung transform produces a nonlinear dissipative wave equation whose symmetric equilibrium limit reduces to the Schroedinger equation, with the quantum potential and linearity emerging from balanced intersector coupling. ... the wavefunction is not fundamental but encodes the interaction geometry between system and environment"

The transform and the definition of 'symmetric equilibrium' (balanced intersector coupling) are constructed such that nonlinear and dissipative contributions cancel identically, forcing the output to be the linear Schrödinger equation plus quantum potential. The wavefunction is defined to represent exactly the interaction geometry whose balance produces the quantum features, so the emergence is tautological once those definitions are adopted rather than independently derived from the action principle without residual terms.

full rationale

The central derivation applies a generalized Madelung transform to coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations obtained from action decomposition, then asserts that the symmetric equilibrium (balanced amplitudes/phases) yields exactly the linear Schrödinger equation with quantum potential emerging automatically. This reduces to the input assumptions once the transform and equilibrium condition are chosen to enforce cancellation of nonlinear/dissipative terms, without independent verification that residuals vanish for arbitrary potentials. The wavefunction is introduced precisely to encode the geometry that produces the claimed quantum features, creating partial circularity in the emergence claim. No self-citation load-bearing or uniqueness theorem is invoked; the paper remains self-contained but the reduction step is definitional rather than derived from external constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on several domain assumptions and newly introduced entities whose independent support is not provided in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption A classical system can be endowed with an intrinsic environment via a complex or quaternionic action principle
Invoked at the outset to generate the dissipative extension and dual-sector structure.
ad hoc to paper The action decomposes cleanly into conservative and divergence-induced components
This split is required to produce the two coupled Hamilton-Jacobi equations.

invented entities (2)

Dual Sector / image sector no independent evidence
purpose: Additional degrees of freedom that exchange energy, information, and phase with the system
Introduced to interpret the extra variables arising from the dissipative action; no independent evidence supplied.
Intersector coupling no independent evidence
purpose: Mechanism that produces quantum potential and linearity when balanced
Postulated to explain the emergence of Schrödinger dynamics; no external falsifiable handle given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5513 in / 1624 out tokens · 46101 ms · 2026-05-10T18:48:43.933190+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Decomposing the action into conservative and divergence-induced components yields two coupled Hamilton–Jacobi equations... Applying a generalized Madelung transform produces a nonlinear dissipative wave equation whose symmetric equilibrium limit reduces to the Schrödinger equation
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the wavefunction is not fundamental but encodes the interaction geometry between system and environment

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

H. Bateman. On dissipative systems and related variational principles.Phys. Rev., 38:815, 1931

work page 1931
[2]

Caldirola

P. Caldirola. Forze non conservative nella meccanica quantistica.Nuovo Cimento, 18:393–400, 1941

work page 1941
[3]

E. Kanai. On the quantization of the dissipative systems.Prog. Theor. Phys., 3:440–442, 1948

work page 1948
[4]

H. Dekker. Classical and quantum mechanics of the damped harmonic oscillator.Phys. Rep., 80(1):1–112, 1981

work page 1981
[5]

C. R. Galley. Classical mechanics of nonconservative systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:174301, 2013

work page 2013
[6]

Born and E

M. Born and E. Wolf.Principles of Optics. Cambridge University Press, 1999

work page 1999
[7]

Landau and E

L. Landau and E. Lifshitz.Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory. Pergamon, 1977. 15

work page 1977
[8]

Courant and D

R. Courant and D. Hilbert.Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. II. Wiley, 1962

work page 1962
[9]

Nelson.Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion

E. Nelson.Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion. Princeton University Press, 1967

work page 1967
[10]

Madelung

E. Madelung. Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form.Z. Phys., 40:322–326, 1926

work page 1926
[11]

D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ’hidden variables’.Phys. Rev., 85:166–193, 1952

work page 1952
[12]

Schroedinger

E. Schroedinger. Quantisierung als eigenwertproblem.Ann. Phys., 79:361–376, 1926

work page 1926
[13]

Holland.The Quantum Theory of Motion

J. Holland.The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993
[14]

Couder and E

Y. Couder and E. Fort. ”single-particle diffraction and interference at a macroscopic scale”.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:154101, 2006

work page 2006
[15]

’t Hooft.The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

G. ’t Hooft.The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, 2016

work page 2016
[16]

N. Matjelo. Considering measurement dynamics in classical mechanics.Advanced Studies in Theo- retical Physics, 15(5):235 – 256, 2021

work page 2021
[17]

N. Matjelo. On the similarity of classical self-interaction dynamics and schroedinger’s equation. Fundamental Journal of Modern Physics, 17(1):55–62, March 2022

work page 2022
[18]

R. Jackiw. A dissipative analogue of quantum mechanics.Physica A, 158(1):269–282, 1989

work page 1989
[19]

E. Nelson. Derivation of the schroedinger equation from newtonian mechanics.Phys. Rev., 150:1079– 1085, 1966

work page 1966
[20]

L. S. Schulman.Techniques and Applications of Path Integration. Wiley, 1981

work page 1981
[21]

H. Dekker. On the use of complex lagrangians for dissipative systems.Phys. Rep., 80:1, 1981

work page 1981
[22]

De Leo and G

S. De Leo and G. Ducati. Quaternionic wave equations: algebraic structure and physical content. J. Math. Phys., 42(9):2236–2265, 2001

work page 2001
[23]

D. F. Styer et al. Nine formulations of quantum mechanics.Am. J. Phys., 70:288–297, 2002

work page 2002
[24]

M. Peskin. On quaternionic generalizations of the schroedinger and klein-gordon equations.Ann. Phys., 351:495–520, 2014

work page 2014
[25]

R. Jackiw. Dissipation and complex action in classical mechanics.Physica A, 158:269–282, 1989

work page 1989
[26]

H. Bateman. On dissipative systems and related variational principles.Phys. Rev., 38:815–819, 1931

work page 1931
[27]

Mostafazadeh

A. Mostafazadeh. Pseudo-hermitian representation of quantum mechanics.Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 7:1191–1306, 2010

work page 2010
[28]

C. F. de Oliveira and R. Lobo. Dual-sector formulations of dissipative dynamics.Ann. Phys., 431:168557, 2021

work page 2021
[29]

M. Berry. Waves and thom’s theorem.Adv. Phys., 25:1–26, 1976

work page 1976
[30]

S. L. Adler.Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields. Oxford University Press, 1995

work page 1995
[31]

Birkhoff and J

G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann. The logic of quantum mechanics.Annals of Mathematics, 37:823– 843, 1936

work page 1936
[32]

De Leo and G

S. De Leo and G. Ducati. Quaternionic differential operators.J. Math. Phys., 42:2236–2265, 2001

work page 2001
[33]

E. C. G. Sudarshan, P. M. Mathews, and J. Rau. Stochastic dynamics of quantum-mechanical systems.Phys. Rev., 121:920–924, 1961

work page 1961
[34]

C. M. Bender. Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltonians.Rep. Prog. Phys., 70:947–1018, 2007

work page 2007
[35]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 2002. 16

work page 2002
[36]

Nelson.Quantum Fluctuations

E. Nelson.Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton University Press, 1985

work page 1985
[37]

De Leo and W

S. De Leo and W. A. Rodrigues. Quaternionic quantum mechanics: an introduction.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 40:2231–2265, 2001

work page 2001
[38]

’t Hooft

G. ’t Hooft. Determinism beneath quantum mechanics.Found. Phys., 41:1829, 2011

work page 2011
[39]

Umezawa, H

H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki.Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States. North-Holland, 1982

work page 1982
[40]

W. H. Zurek. Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical.Phys. Today, 44:36, 1991

work page 1991
[41]

Barandes

J. Barandes. Non-markovian quantum mechanics. arXiv:1909.11509, 2019

work page arXiv 1909
[42]

Distinguishing standard reionization from dark matter models

J. Barandes and D. Kagan. Relational time in quantum mechanics. arXiv:1002.4405, 2010

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[43]

Kochen and E

S. Kochen and E. P. Specker. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17:59–87, 1967

work page 1967
[44]

N. D. Mermin. Hidden variables and the two theorems of john bell.Reviews of Modern Physics, 65:803–815, 1993

work page 1993
[45]

J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.Physics, 1:195–200, 1964

work page 1964
[46]

G. J. Milburn.Quantum Theory of Open Systems. Oxford University Press, 1998

work page 1998
[47]

Dalibard, Y

J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer. Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:580, 1992

work page 1992
[48]

Ritsch, P

H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger. Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials.Rev. Mod. Phys., 85:553, 2013

work page 2013
[49]

Hornberger et al

K. Hornberger et al. Collisional decoherence observed in matter-wave interferometry.Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:160401, 2003

work page 2003
[50]

Gardiner and P

C. Gardiner and P. Zoller.Quantum Noise. Springer, 3rd edition, 2004

work page 2004
[51]

A. J. Leggett. Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 14:415, 2002

work page 2002
[52]

A. J. Leggett and A. Garg. Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?Phys. Rev. Lett., 54:857, 1985

work page 1985
[53]

Arndt et al

M. Arndt et al. Wave particle duality of c60 molecules.Nature, 401:680–682, 1999

work page 1999
[54]

N. Gisin. Collapse and nonlinearity in quantum mechanics.Phys. Lett. A, 143:1, 1990

work page 1990
[55]

H. D. Doebner and G. A. Goldin. On a general nonlinear schroedinger equation.Phys. Lett. A, 162:397, 1992

work page 1992
[56]

Amelino-Camelia

G. Amelino-Camelia. Relativity in planck-scale physics.Nature, 418:34, 2002

work page 2002
[57]

Santamato

E. Santamato. Geometry and quantum mechanics.Phys. Rev. D, 29:216, 1984. 17

work page 1984

[1] [1]

H. Bateman. On dissipative systems and related variational principles.Phys. Rev., 38:815, 1931

work page 1931

[2] [2]

Caldirola

P. Caldirola. Forze non conservative nella meccanica quantistica.Nuovo Cimento, 18:393–400, 1941

work page 1941

[3] [3]

E. Kanai. On the quantization of the dissipative systems.Prog. Theor. Phys., 3:440–442, 1948

work page 1948

[4] [4]

H. Dekker. Classical and quantum mechanics of the damped harmonic oscillator.Phys. Rep., 80(1):1–112, 1981

work page 1981

[5] [5]

C. R. Galley. Classical mechanics of nonconservative systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:174301, 2013

work page 2013

[6] [6]

Born and E

M. Born and E. Wolf.Principles of Optics. Cambridge University Press, 1999

work page 1999

[7] [7]

Landau and E

L. Landau and E. Lifshitz.Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory. Pergamon, 1977. 15

work page 1977

[8] [8]

Courant and D

R. Courant and D. Hilbert.Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. II. Wiley, 1962

work page 1962

[9] [9]

Nelson.Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion

E. Nelson.Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion. Princeton University Press, 1967

work page 1967

[10] [10]

Madelung

E. Madelung. Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form.Z. Phys., 40:322–326, 1926

work page 1926

[11] [11]

D. Bohm. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ’hidden variables’.Phys. Rev., 85:166–193, 1952

work page 1952

[12] [12]

Schroedinger

E. Schroedinger. Quantisierung als eigenwertproblem.Ann. Phys., 79:361–376, 1926

work page 1926

[13] [13]

Holland.The Quantum Theory of Motion

J. Holland.The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge University Press, 1993

work page 1993

[14] [14]

Couder and E

Y. Couder and E. Fort. ”single-particle diffraction and interference at a macroscopic scale”.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:154101, 2006

work page 2006

[15] [15]

’t Hooft.The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

G. ’t Hooft.The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, 2016

work page 2016

[16] [16]

N. Matjelo. Considering measurement dynamics in classical mechanics.Advanced Studies in Theo- retical Physics, 15(5):235 – 256, 2021

work page 2021

[17] [17]

N. Matjelo. On the similarity of classical self-interaction dynamics and schroedinger’s equation. Fundamental Journal of Modern Physics, 17(1):55–62, March 2022

work page 2022

[18] [18]

R. Jackiw. A dissipative analogue of quantum mechanics.Physica A, 158(1):269–282, 1989

work page 1989

[19] [19]

E. Nelson. Derivation of the schroedinger equation from newtonian mechanics.Phys. Rev., 150:1079– 1085, 1966

work page 1966

[20] [20]

L. S. Schulman.Techniques and Applications of Path Integration. Wiley, 1981

work page 1981

[21] [21]

H. Dekker. On the use of complex lagrangians for dissipative systems.Phys. Rep., 80:1, 1981

work page 1981

[22] [22]

De Leo and G

S. De Leo and G. Ducati. Quaternionic wave equations: algebraic structure and physical content. J. Math. Phys., 42(9):2236–2265, 2001

work page 2001

[23] [23]

D. F. Styer et al. Nine formulations of quantum mechanics.Am. J. Phys., 70:288–297, 2002

work page 2002

[24] [24]

M. Peskin. On quaternionic generalizations of the schroedinger and klein-gordon equations.Ann. Phys., 351:495–520, 2014

work page 2014

[25] [25]

R. Jackiw. Dissipation and complex action in classical mechanics.Physica A, 158:269–282, 1989

work page 1989

[26] [26]

H. Bateman. On dissipative systems and related variational principles.Phys. Rev., 38:815–819, 1931

work page 1931

[27] [27]

Mostafazadeh

A. Mostafazadeh. Pseudo-hermitian representation of quantum mechanics.Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 7:1191–1306, 2010

work page 2010

[28] [28]

C. F. de Oliveira and R. Lobo. Dual-sector formulations of dissipative dynamics.Ann. Phys., 431:168557, 2021

work page 2021

[29] [29]

M. Berry. Waves and thom’s theorem.Adv. Phys., 25:1–26, 1976

work page 1976

[30] [30]

S. L. Adler.Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields. Oxford University Press, 1995

work page 1995

[31] [31]

Birkhoff and J

G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann. The logic of quantum mechanics.Annals of Mathematics, 37:823– 843, 1936

work page 1936

[32] [32]

De Leo and G

S. De Leo and G. Ducati. Quaternionic differential operators.J. Math. Phys., 42:2236–2265, 2001

work page 2001

[33] [33]

E. C. G. Sudarshan, P. M. Mathews, and J. Rau. Stochastic dynamics of quantum-mechanical systems.Phys. Rev., 121:920–924, 1961

work page 1961

[34] [34]

C. M. Bender. Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltonians.Rep. Prog. Phys., 70:947–1018, 2007

work page 2007

[35] [35]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 2002. 16

work page 2002

[36] [36]

Nelson.Quantum Fluctuations

E. Nelson.Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton University Press, 1985

work page 1985

[37] [37]

De Leo and W

S. De Leo and W. A. Rodrigues. Quaternionic quantum mechanics: an introduction.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 40:2231–2265, 2001

work page 2001

[38] [38]

’t Hooft

G. ’t Hooft. Determinism beneath quantum mechanics.Found. Phys., 41:1829, 2011

work page 2011

[39] [39]

Umezawa, H

H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki.Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States. North-Holland, 1982

work page 1982

[40] [40]

W. H. Zurek. Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical.Phys. Today, 44:36, 1991

work page 1991

[41] [41]

Barandes

J. Barandes. Non-markovian quantum mechanics. arXiv:1909.11509, 2019

work page arXiv 1909

[42] [42]

Distinguishing standard reionization from dark matter models

J. Barandes and D. Kagan. Relational time in quantum mechanics. arXiv:1002.4405, 2010

work page Pith review arXiv 2010

[43] [43]

Kochen and E

S. Kochen and E. P. Specker. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17:59–87, 1967

work page 1967

[44] [44]

N. D. Mermin. Hidden variables and the two theorems of john bell.Reviews of Modern Physics, 65:803–815, 1993

work page 1993

[45] [45]

J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.Physics, 1:195–200, 1964

work page 1964

[46] [46]

G. J. Milburn.Quantum Theory of Open Systems. Oxford University Press, 1998

work page 1998

[47] [47]

Dalibard, Y

J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer. Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:580, 1992

work page 1992

[48] [48]

Ritsch, P

H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger. Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials.Rev. Mod. Phys., 85:553, 2013

work page 2013

[49] [49]

Hornberger et al

K. Hornberger et al. Collisional decoherence observed in matter-wave interferometry.Phys. Rev. Lett., 90:160401, 2003

work page 2003

[50] [50]

Gardiner and P

C. Gardiner and P. Zoller.Quantum Noise. Springer, 3rd edition, 2004

work page 2004

[51] [51]

A. J. Leggett. Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 14:415, 2002

work page 2002

[52] [52]

A. J. Leggett and A. Garg. Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?Phys. Rev. Lett., 54:857, 1985

work page 1985

[53] [53]

Arndt et al

M. Arndt et al. Wave particle duality of c60 molecules.Nature, 401:680–682, 1999

work page 1999

[54] [54]

N. Gisin. Collapse and nonlinearity in quantum mechanics.Phys. Lett. A, 143:1, 1990

work page 1990

[55] [55]

H. D. Doebner and G. A. Goldin. On a general nonlinear schroedinger equation.Phys. Lett. A, 162:397, 1992

work page 1992

[56] [56]

Amelino-Camelia

G. Amelino-Camelia. Relativity in planck-scale physics.Nature, 418:34, 2002

work page 2002

[57] [57]

Santamato

E. Santamato. Geometry and quantum mechanics.Phys. Rev. D, 29:216, 1984. 17

work page 1984