arxiv: 2604.06496 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Floquet X-Ray Scattering as a Probe of Hidden Electronic Orders

Martin Eckstein , Eva Paprotzki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords Floquet X-ray scatteringhidden electronic ordersKagome latticebond correlationscurrent correlationsresonant inelastic X-ray scatteringperiodic drivingsymmetry breaking

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Floquet X-ray scattering directly accesses bond and current correlations invisible to conventional diffraction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a theoretical framework that combines Floquet theory with the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion to describe resonant X-ray scattering under periodic driving. It derives a compact expression for the Floquet components of the scattering operator, which shows that the driven scattering process picks up bond and current correlations that produce no charge Bragg peaks in ordinary X-ray diffraction. When the framework is applied to charge-ordered states on the Kagome lattice, each symmetry-breaking pattern leaves a distinct polarization signature in the Floquet Bragg peaks. The relative strength of bond versus current contributions can be adjusted simply by changing the drive frequency. This positions the method as a symmetry-resolved probe capable of detecting hidden electronic orders or their fluctuations.

Core claim

Floquet X-ray scattering provides direct access to bond and current correlations that do not directly produce charge Bragg peaks in conventional diffraction. Applying this framework to charge-ordered states on the Kagome lattice demonstrates that different symmetry-breaking orders exhibit distinct polarization fingerprints in the Floquet Bragg peaks, and that the relative weight of bond and current contributions can be tuned through the drive frequency.

What carries the argument

The Floquet components of the resonant inelastic X-ray scattering operator obtained from Floquet theory plus the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion.

If this is right

Bond and current correlations become visible in the scattering spectrum under periodic driving even when they produce no static charge Bragg peaks.
Polarization dependence of the Floquet peaks distinguishes different symmetry-breaking orders.
Varying the drive frequency shifts the relative contribution of bond versus current terms in the observed signal.
The technique supplies a symmetry-resolved window onto hidden electronic order or fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same scattering operator could be used to track how fluctuating hidden orders respond to the drive in real time.
Extension to other lattices with hidden orders would require only replacing the underlying model Hamiltonian while keeping the Floquet scattering framework unchanged.
Comparison with driven ARPES or other Floquet spectroscopies could cross-check which correlations dominate in a given material.

Load-bearing premise

The ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion remains valid under periodic driving and the model Hamiltonians for charge-ordered states on the Kagome lattice correctly represent the hidden bond and current orders.

What would settle it

Measurement of whether the polarization dependence and frequency-tuned intensity ratios of Floquet Bragg peaks match the distinct fingerprints predicted for specific bond-order or current-order patterns on the Kagome lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06496 by Eva Paprotzki, Martin Eckstein.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) Kagome lattice, showing the three nearest-neighbor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: As Fig. 3, but for a superposition of real BO and LCO, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: F-XRD intensity Iq,n(φ) as a function of the polarization angle φ for selected ordered states on the Kagome lattice. The polar plots show the intensity in the first (n = 1) and second (n = 2) Floquet sidebands for the three Bragg vectors q = M1,2,3. The polarization direction A0 = A0(cos φ, sin φ) is defined relative to the crystallographic axes a1 (legend on the right). For each panel, the maximum intensi… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a theoretical framework for Floquet resonant X-ray scattering, using Floquet theory combined with the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion. We obtain a compact expression for the Floquet components of the resonant inelastic X-ray scattering operator, which shows that Floquet X-ray scattering provides direct access to bond and current correlations that do not directly produce charge Bragg peaks in conventional diffraction. Applying this framework to charge-ordered states on the Kagome lattice, we demonstrate that different symmetry-breaking orders exhibit distinct polarization fingerprints in the Floquet Bragg peaks. Moreover, the relative weight of bond and current contributions can be tuned through the drive frequency. These results establish Floquet X-ray scattering as a symmetry-resolved probe of hidden electronic order or fluctuations in quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a clean theoretical route to make bond and current orders visible in driven X-ray scattering on the Kagome lattice, but the key approximation needs explicit validation under periodic drive.

read the letter

The main point is that periodic driving combined with resonant X-ray scattering can isolate bond and current correlations that stay hidden in ordinary diffraction. They use Floquet theory plus the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion to write a compact operator for the Floquet RIXS components, then apply it to charge-ordered states on the Kagome lattice. Different symmetry-breaking patterns produce distinct polarization fingerprints in the Bragg peaks, and the drive frequency can shift the relative weight of bond versus current terms. That concrete mapping is the useful new piece; it is not just a restatement of prior Floquet or RIXS results. The derivation follows standard steps and the abstract keeps the logic straightforward without obvious parameter fitting or self-reference loops. The Kagome example is worked out enough to show the symmetry resolution in practice. The soft spot is the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion itself. The stress-test note is right to flag that periodic driving adds a new frequency scale; if the drive period or amplitude approaches the inverse core-hole lifetime, retardation and virtual processes can mix charge, bond, and current channels and weaken the claimed separation. The paper should show that its chosen parameters keep the expansion safe or at least bound the size of the corrections. Without that check the “direct access” language is a little strong. This is aimed at condensed-matter theorists and experimentalists who already run RIXS or Floquet experiments on quantum materials. It is worth sending to peer review because the framework is new and the Kagome application is specific enough that referees can test the approximation and the polarization predictions directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework for Floquet resonant X-ray scattering by combining Floquet theory with the ultrashort core-hole lifetime (UCL) expansion. It derives a compact expression for the Floquet components of the resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) operator, which is claimed to provide direct access to bond and current correlations that do not produce charge Bragg peaks in conventional diffraction. The framework is applied to charge-ordered states on the Kagome lattice, where different symmetry-breaking orders are shown to exhibit distinct polarization fingerprints in the Floquet Bragg peaks, with relative weights of bond and current contributions tunable by drive frequency.

Significance. If the central approximations hold, the work establishes Floquet X-ray scattering as a symmetry-resolved probe of hidden electronic orders and fluctuations, extending standard RIXS tools to driven systems and offering concrete, falsifiable predictions for experiments on quantum materials. The derivation is parameter-free in its leading-order form and builds directly on established Floquet and core-hole lifetime methods without introducing new fitted parameters.

major comments (2)

[§2.2, Eq. (7)] §2.2, Eq. (7): The UCL expansion is applied to the time-periodic driven Hamiltonian without deriving or stating the validity condition that the core-hole decay rate Γ must greatly exceed the drive frequency ω_d (and associated virtual processes). This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed separation of bond/current channels from charge Bragg peaks in the Floquet RIXS operator; no error estimate or limiting-case check is provided for the regime where drive-induced retardation effects could mix channels.
[§3.1, Eq. (12)] §3.1, Eq. (12): The compact Floquet RIXS operator is asserted to isolate bond and current correlations, but the derivation retains only the leading UCL term; higher-order retardation corrections under periodic driving are not bounded, which directly affects the central claim that these correlations 'do not directly produce charge Bragg peaks in conventional diffraction.'

minor comments (2)

[Figs. 2–4] The polarization dependence in the Kagome lattice results (Figs. 2–4) would benefit from explicit tabulation of the symmetry channels for each order to make the 'distinct fingerprints' claim easier to verify.
[§2] Notation for the Floquet harmonics (e.g., the index n in the scattering operator) is introduced in the text but could be summarized in a single equation early in §2 for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding the validity conditions of the ultrashort core-hole lifetime (UCL) expansion in the driven regime are well taken, and we agree that explicit discussion is needed to support the central claims. We respond point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the necessary clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§2.2, Eq. (7)] §2.2, Eq. (7): The UCL expansion is applied to the time-periodic driven Hamiltonian without deriving or stating the validity condition that the core-hole decay rate Γ must greatly exceed the drive frequency ω_d (and associated virtual processes). This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed separation of bond/current channels from charge Bragg peaks in the Floquet RIXS operator; no error estimate or limiting-case check is provided for the regime where drive-induced retardation effects could mix channels.

Authors: We agree that the validity condition Γ ≫ ω_d (and related virtual processes) was not explicitly stated or derived for the driven case. The UCL approximation requires the core-hole lifetime to be the shortest timescale; under periodic driving this implies that the core hole decays before drive-induced retardation accumulates appreciably. We will add a dedicated paragraph in §2.2 that derives this condition from the time-dependent resolvent and discusses its consequences for channel separation. A full quantitative error bound on higher-order retardation terms would require extending the UCL expansion to next order, which lies outside the present scope; however, we will include a qualitative estimate showing that such corrections scale as O(ω_d/Γ) and remain negligible for typical core-hole widths (Γ ∼ 1–10 eV) and drive frequencies in the THz–optical range. This addition will make the regime of applicability transparent without modifying the leading-order results. revision: yes
Referee: [§3.1, Eq. (12)] §3.1, Eq. (12): The compact Floquet RIXS operator is asserted to isolate bond and current correlations, but the derivation retains only the leading UCL term; higher-order retardation corrections under periodic driving are not bounded, which directly affects the central claim that these correlations 'do not directly produce charge Bragg peaks in conventional diffraction.'

Authors: The compact expression in Eq. (12) is obtained strictly at leading order in the UCL expansion, which projects the scattering operator onto the bond and current channels and thereby excludes direct charge Bragg contributions. Higher-order retardation corrections under periodic driving are indeed present but are suppressed by the same factor O(ω_d/Γ) discussed above. We will revise §3.1 to state this bound explicitly and to note that the isolation of bond/current correlations holds in the regime where the leading term dominates. This clarification supports, rather than weakens, the claim that these correlations do not produce charge Bragg peaks in conventional diffraction, consistent with the standard use of UCL in equilibrium RIXS. The central conclusions of the manuscript remain unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies standard Floquet theory plus external UCL expansion

full rationale

The framework combines Floquet theory with the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion drawn from prior literature to derive a compact expression for the Floquet RIXS operator. This yields the stated access to bond/current correlations as a direct consequence of the time-averaged scattering operator under the stated approximations. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or renamed input; the Kagome-lattice application is an explicit model calculation rather than a tautology. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard condensed-matter tools applied to a new scattering context; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)

standard math Floquet theory applies to periodically driven quantum systems
Invoked to describe the driven electronic states and scattering operator.
domain assumption Ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion is valid for resonant X-ray scattering
Used to obtain the compact expression for the Floquet components of the scattering operator.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1337 out tokens · 58248 ms · 2026-05-10T18:06:26.177291+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We obtain a compact expression for the Floquet components of the resonant inelastic X-ray scattering operator... RFq,n = J sn / [z(z+inΩ)] Σℓ,± Jn,ℓ Rn,± Fq,ℓ,± Bℓ,±(−1)n(q)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Floquet theory combined with the ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

2b and c

shown in Fig. 2b and c. By adding a mean-field termH D = ∆P j BD j to the hopping Hamiltonian, we prepare symmetry-broken states and com- pute their Floquet scattering signal using Eq. (10), for a lin- early polarized driveA 0 =A 0(cosφˆx+ sinφˆy). Figure 3 shows the resulting intensityI q,n(φ) =|⟨R F Mq,n⟩|2 as a func- tion of the polarization angle for ...

work page
[2]

One finds that first Floquet sideband at the Bragg peakq=M q ex- hibits intensity maxima forA 0 ∥M q andA 0 ⊥M q for the BOF 1 and the LCOF ′ 2, respectively, thus allowing to distin- guish between the two states. The three components of the three-dimensional order parameters correspond to the three wave vectorsM q and are probed independently, such that ...

work page 2056
[3]

L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 705 (2011)

work page 2011
[4]

Mitrano, S

M. Mitrano, S. Johnston, Y .-J. Kim, and M. P. M. Dean, Explor- ing quantum materials with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. X14, 040501 (2024)

work page 2024
[5]

Giannetti, M

C. Giannetti, M. Capone, D. Fausti, M. Fabrizio, F. Parmigiani, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of strongly correlated materials and high-temperature superconductors: a non-equilibrium approach, Advances in Physics65, 58 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

de la Torre, D

A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

Murakami, D

Y . Murakami, D. Goleˇz, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Photoin- duced nonequilibrium states in mott insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 035001 (2025)

work page 2025
[8]

Mitrano and Y

M. Mitrano and Y . Wang, Probing light-driven quantum mate- rials with ultrafast resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Commu- nications Physics3, 184 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

Lojewski, D

T. Lojewski, D. Goleˇz, K. Ollefs, L. Le Guyader, L. K¨ammerer, N. Rothenbach, R. Y . Engel, P. S. Miedema, M. Beye, G. S. Chi- uzb˘aian, R. Carley, R. Gort, B. E. Van Kuiken, G. Mercurio, J. Schlappa, A. Yaroslavtsev, A. Scherz, F. D ¨oring, C. David, H. Wende, U. Bovensiepen, M. Eckstein, P. Werner, and A. Es- chenlohr, Photoinduced charge transfer reno...

work page 2024
[10]

Merzoni, L

G. Merzoni, L. Martinelli, S. Parchenko, S. F. R. TenHuisen, V . Lebedev, L. Adriano, R. Carley, N. Gerasimova, L. Mer- cadier, M. Teichmann, B. E. van Kuiken, Z. Yin, A. Alic, D. R. Baykusheva, S. G. Chiuzbaian, S. D. Conte, O. Dogadov, A. F ¨ohlisch, M. W. Haverkort, M. Kusch, T. Laarmann, W. S. Lee, M. M. Sala, Y . Y . Peng, Q. Z. Qiu, T. Schmitt, S. S...

work page arXiv 2025
[11]

Padma, P

H. Padma, P. Sharma, S. F. R. TenHuisen, F. Glerean, A. Roll, P. Zhou, S. Kundu, A. Romaguera, E. Skoropata, H. Ueda, B. Liu, E. Paris, Y . Wang, S. H. Lee, Z. Mao, M. P. M. Dean, E. W. Huang, E. Razzoli, Y . Wang, and M. Mitrano, A light-induced charge order mode in a metastable cuprate ladder (2025), arXiv:2510.24686 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[12]

Y . Wang, Y . Chen, T. P. Devereaux, B. Moritz, and M. Mitrano, X-ray scattering from light-driven spin fluctuations in a doped mott insulator, Communications Physics4, 212 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

Y . Wang, Y . Chen, C. Jia, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Time- resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in a pumped mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B101, 165126 (2020)

work page 2020
[14]

Werner and M

P. Werner and M. Eckstein, Nonequilibrium resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study of an electron-phonon model, Phys. Rev. B104, 085155 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

Y . Chen, Y . Wang, M. Claassen, B. Moritz, and T. P. Dev- ereaux, Observing photo-induced chiral edge states of graphene nanoribbons in pump-probe spectroscopies, npj Quantum Ma- terials5, 84 (2020)

work page 2020
[16]

Kim, T.-K

J. Kim, T.-K. Choi, E. Mercer, L. T. Schmidt, J. Park, S.-Y . Park, D. Jang, S. H. Chang, A. Said, S. H. Chun, K. J. Lee, S. W. Lee, H. Jeong, H. Jeong, C. Lee, K.-Y . Choi, F. Bahrami, F. Tafti, M. Claassen, and A. D. L. Torre, Ultrafast renormaliza- tion of the magnetic continuum in the proximal kitaev quantum spin liquid h3liir2o6 by tr-rixs, Opt. Mate...

work page 2025
[17]

M ¨uller, F

A. M ¨uller, F. Grandi, and M. Eckstein, Ultrafast control of spin- orbital separation probed with time-resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B106, L121107 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

T. E. Glover, D. M. Fritz, M. Cammarata, T. K. Allison, S. Coh, J. M. Feldkamp, H. Lemke, D. Zhu, Y . Feng, R. N. Coffee, M. Fuchs, S. Ghimire, J. Chen, S. Shwartz, D. A. Reis, S. E. Harris, and J. B. Hastings, X-ray and optical wave mixing, Na- ture488, 603 (2012)

work page 2012
[19]

Popova-Gorelova, D

D. Popova-Gorelova, D. A. Reis, and R. Santra, Theory of x- ray scattering from laser-driven electronic systems, Phys. Rev. B98, 224302 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

D. Popova-Gorelova, Perspective: towards real-time extreme ultraviolet to x-ray imaging and spectroscopy of laser-driven materials, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 172501 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Ornelas-Skarin, T

C. Ornelas-Skarin, T. Bezriadina, M. Fuchs, S. Ghimire, J. B. Hastings, Q. L. Nguyen, G. de la Pe ˜na, T. Sato, S. Shwartz, M. Trigo, D. Zhu, D. Popova-Gorelova, and D. A. Reis, Second- order microscopic nonlinear optical susceptibility in a cen- trosymmetric material: Application to imaging valence electron motion, Phys. Rev. X16, 011006 (2026)

work page 2026
[22]

Popova-Gorelova and R

D. Popova-Gorelova and R. Santra, Imaging interatomic elec- tron current in crystals with ultrafast resonant x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B92, 184304 (2015)

work page 2015
[23]

Popova-Gorelova and R

D. Popova-Gorelova and R. Santra, Atomic-scale imaging of laser-driven electron dynamics in solids, Communications Physics7, 317 (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Sturm, A

J. Sturm, A. Benediktovitch, N. Rohringer, and A. Knorr, The- ory of x-ray scattering from optically pumped excitons in atom- ically thin semiconductors (2026), arXiv:2603.19876 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

C. M. Varma, Non-fermi-liquid states and pairing instability of a general model of copper oxide metals, Phys. Rev. B55, 14554 (1997)

work page 1997
[26]

M. E. Simon and C. M. Varma, Detection and implications of a time-reversal breaking state in underdoped cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 247003 (2002)

work page 2002
[27]

C. M. Varma, Theory of the pseudogap state of the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B73, 155113 (2006)

work page 2006
[28]

Di Sante, T

D. Di Sante, T. Neupert, G. Sangiovanni, R. Thomale, R. Comin, J. G. Checkelsky, I. Zeljkovic, and S. D. Wilson, Kagome metals, Rev. Mod. Phys.98, 015002 (2026)

work page 2026
[29]

Neupert, M

T. Neupert, M. M. Denner, J.-X. Yin, R. Thomale, and M. Z. Hasan, Charge order and superconductivity in kagome materi- als, Nature Physics18, 137 (2022)

work page 2022
[30]

R.-Q. Fu, J. Zhan, M. D ¨urrnagel, H. Hohmann, R. Thomale, 6 J. Hu, Z. Wang, S. Zhou, and X. Wu, Exotic charge den- sity waves and superconductivity on the kagome lattice (2024), arXiv:2405.09451 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[31]

Wagner, C

G. Wagner, C. Guo, P. J. W. Moll, T. Neupert, and M. H. Fis- cher, Phenomenology of bond and flux orders in kagome met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 125136 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

T. Park, M. Ye, and L. Balents, Electronic instabilities of kagome metals: Saddle points and landau theory, Phys. Rev. B104, 035142 (2021)

work page 2021
[33]

M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fer- nandes, Theory of the charge density wave inav 3sb5 kagome metals, Phys. Rev. B104, 214513 (2021)

work page 2021
[34]

H. Tan, Y . Liu, Z. Wang, and B. Yan, Charge density waves and electronic properties of superconducting kagome metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 046401 (2021)

work page 2021
[35]

M. M. Denner, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Analysis of charge order in the kagome metalav 3sb5 (a= K,Rb,Cs), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 217601 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

Y . Chen, Y . Wang, C. Jia, B. Moritz, A. M. Shvaika, J. K. Fre- ericks, and T. P. Devereaux, Theory for time-resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B99, 104306 (2019)

work page 2019
[37]

Eckstein and P

M. Eckstein and P. Werner, Simulation of time-dependent reso- nant inelastic x-ray scattering using nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B103, 115136 (2021)

work page 2021
[38]

Bukov, L

M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high- frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to floquet engineering, Advances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

work page 2015
[39]

van den Brink and M

J. van den Brink and M. van Veenendaal, Correlation functions measured by indirect resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Euro- physics Letters73, 121 (2005)

work page 2005
[40]

L. J. P. Ament, F. Forte, and J. van den Brink, Ultrashort lifetime expansion for indirect resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B75, 115118 (2007)

work page 2007
[41]

Grandi, R

F. Grandi, R. Thomale, and D. M. Kennes, Nonequilibrium con- trol of kagome metals, Journal of Materials Research39, 3183 (2024) . Appendix A: Xray scattering formalism on periodically driven systems: Derivations

work page 2024
[42]

[34], we consider X-ray scattering in a minimal model with a single localized core orbital per lattice siter, neglect- ing inter-site core hopping

Scattering operators As in Ref. [34], we consider X-ray scattering in a minimal model with a single localized core orbital per lattice siter, neglect- ing inter-site core hopping. The annihilation operators for valence and core electrons are denoted bycr andf r, respectively, with the corresponding one-particle states being|w c r⟩and|w f r ⟩. The Hamilton...

work page
[43]

Inserting this into Eq

Scattering formalism for time-periodic systems In a periodically driven system, the valence evolution operator can be written in Floquet form as U(t, t ′) =e −iK(t) e−i(t−t′)HF eiK(t ′),(S8) whereK(t)is a time-periodic kick operator andH F the time-independent Floquet Hamiltonian [36]. Inserting this into Eq. (S6), we obtain Iq(ωi, ωo) = X r,r′ eiq·(r−r′)...

work page
[44]

Floquet ultrashort core-hole lifetime expansion (F-UCL) To simplify the Floquet scattering operatorR F q,n [Eq. (S11)], we use that both the inverse core-hole lifetime and the driving frequencyΩcan be large or comparable to the relevant energy scales of the valence-band model;1/Γcan be on the order of a few fs in real materials, whileΩcan be chosen suffic...

work page
[45]

Fq,ℓ,+Bℓ,(−1)n(q) z z+inΩ −1 −i(−1) n z z+inΩ + 1 Fq,ℓ,−Bℓ,(−1)n+1(q) # (S51) =−J X ℓ snJn,ℓ z(z+inΩ)

Expansion of the Floquet scattering operator in bond operators In a driven system, electromagnetic fields couple generically to the kinetic (hopping) terms via Peierls phases, i.e., to bond operators. It is therefore natural to express both the Hamiltonian and the Floquet RIXS operator in a bond-operator basis. We let Rdenote the unit-cell position and us...

work page
[46]

Time-reversal symmetry We briefly discuss the transformation of the Floquet scattering operator under time-reversal symmetry. For spinless fermions, the time-reversal operatorTacts as complex conjugation in combination with Tc r T −1 =c r.(S58) With this, the bond operatorsB ℓ,+(R)(B ℓ,−(R)) are even (odd) under time reversal. Furthermore, under complex c...

work page
[47]

Here we derive a Floquet extension of the well-known Kramers-Heisenberg formula for equilibrium RIXS, which holds for any core-hole lifetime

Floquet Kramers-Heisenberg expression Although we have derived the Floquet scattering explicitly via a high-frequency and short core-hole lifetime expansion, it is interesting to note that a more general formal expression for driven RIXS can also be obtained. Here we derive a Floquet extension of the well-known Kramers-Heisenberg formula for equilibrium R...

work page
[48]

Using the notation from above, there is just one site and one bondℓ(r−1→r) per unit cellr, withδ ℓ = 1

Details of derivation As a simple example, suitable for numerical benchmarking, we consider a one-dimensional chain, H(t) =−J X r (c† r+1creiA(t) +h.c.).(S68) In this section, we provide some details of the derivation of the resulting expressions for the scattering operators, as well ad additional numerical results. Using the notation from above, there is...

work page
[49]

S1 a benchmark similar to that in the main text, but for a shorter core-hole lifetime

Benchmark for largerΓ/Ω For completeness, we present in Fig. S1 a benchmark similar to that in the main text, but for a shorter core-hole lifetime. Figure S1 shows the RIXS intensity for a drive withA 0 = 1.5andΩ = 4, and a core decay set byΓ = 10. The first and second rows of the figure show the signal in the spectral range of the main peak and the first...

work page
[50]

Decomposition of Bond operators To classify the different bond orders, it is useful to group the bond operatorsB ℓ,± =P R Bℓ,±(R)according to symmetry [29]. The relevant symmetry group isC ′′′ 6v, which is generated by translationsT ai of the lattice,C 6 rotations around the center of the hexagons, mirror reflectionsσ v through opposite bonds of the hexag...

work page
[51]

We restrict this analysis to the first sidebandn= 1

Floquet scattering form factors We now determine how these symmetry-breaking orders appear in the Floquet scattering signal. We restrict this analysis to the first sidebandn= 1. The analysis for higher sidebands can be performed analogously, but these sidebands are weaker and therefore experimentally harder to access. Forn= 1, the scattering operator (S53...

work page
[52]

Polarization selection rules The angular dependence of the form factorsF D Mq(A0, φ)is shown in Fig. S3. A clear symmetry-based selection rule emerges: representationsF 2 andF 4 have maximal intensity forA 0 ⊥M q, whereas representationsF 1 andF 3 are maximal forA 0 ∥M q. This follows from mirror symmetry with respect to a mirror plane parallel toM q. For...

work page