pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06584 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🪐 quant-ph

Deterministic linear-optical computing with symmetry-based qubits

David S. Simon , Christopher R. Schwarze , Anthony D. Manni , Abdoulaye Ndao , Alexander V. Sergienko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords linear optical quantum computingsymmetry-based qubitsGrover four-portdeterministic CNOTFredkin gateToffoli gatequantum logic gates
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Symmetry-based qubits allow Grover four-ports to implement deterministic CNOT gates without post-selection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that encoding qubits in photon spatial symmetry rather than polarization or path lets the Grover four-port perform a controlled-NOT operation deterministically. This gate needs no ancillary photons, measurements, or post-selection, which are usual requirements in linear-optical quantum logic. Combinations of these ports with ordinary optical components can then create programmable devices for one-, two-, and three-qubit gates including the Fredkin and Toffoli. A reader would care because the approach removes a major practical barrier to building larger linear-optical quantum processors.

Core claim

Use of a symmetry-based qubit encoding allows Grover four-ports to act as compact, low-resource deterministic linear optical controlled-NOT gates with no post-selection or ancilla measurements required. This enables programmable devices made from Grover multiports in combination with other standard optical components that can implement multiple different one-, two-, and three-qubit gates, including the Fredkin and Toffoli gates.

What carries the argument

The symmetry-based qubit encoding, which couples a photon's spatial symmetry to its direction of travel in the Grover four-port to realize a deterministic controlled-NOT operation.

If this is right

  • Linear-optical Fredkin and Toffoli gates become deterministic and compact.
  • Programmable devices can execute arbitrary one-, two-, and three-qubit operations using Grover multiports plus standard components.
  • Resource count for linear-optical quantum circuits drops because no ancilla photons or post-selection are needed for the CNOT.
  • Multi-qubit gates can be built without the usual probabilistic overhead of linear optics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing linear-optical hardware could be reconfigured around symmetry encoding to reach larger circuit depths before decoherence limits are hit.
  • The same symmetry-to-direction coupling might extend to other multiports for additional deterministic gates.
  • Integration with photonic integrated circuits could further reduce the physical footprint of these gates.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry-based qubit encoding remains coherent and couples perfectly to direction through the Grover four-port without loss or mode mismatch in a physical optical system.

What would settle it

An experimental test of the proposed CNOT in which correct gate operation requires post-selection or ancillary measurements.

read the original abstract

A particular type of linear optical multiport, the Grover four-port, has previously been shown to couple the spatial symmetry of a photon to its direction of travel. It is shown here that use of a nonstandard choice of qubit, based on symmetry, allows Grover four ports to act as compact, low-resource deterministic linear optical controlledNOTgates, with no post-selection or ancilla measurements required. This approach allows programmable devices, made from Grover multiports in combination with other standard optical components, that can implement multiple different one-, two-, and three-qubit gates, including the Fredkin and Toffoli gates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using a symmetry-based qubit encoding (even/odd spatial parity) with Grover four-ports to realize deterministic linear-optical CNOT gates that require no post-selection or ancilla measurements. It further claims that combinations of these with standard optical components yield programmable devices implementing families of one-, two-, and three-qubit gates, including Fredkin and Toffoli.

Significance. If the central mapping holds with unit fidelity and no leakage, the scheme would materially reduce resource overhead in linear-optical quantum computing by supplying compact, deterministic two-qubit gates. The approach re-uses previously established symmetry-to-direction coupling of Grover multiports under a nonstandard encoding choice, which is a genuine conceptual contribution even if the explicit verification is incomplete.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main proposal] The central claim (abstract and main text) asserts that the Grover four-port unitary maps each two-photon symmetry-encoded computational basis state |ij>_sym exactly onto the CNOT output |i, i⊕j>_sym with total probability 1 and zero amplitude outside the logical subspace. No explicit 4-mode unitary restricted to the symmetrized two-photon states, nor any matrix-element calculation demonstrating closure of the logical subspace, is supplied; this is the load-bearing step for the deterministic-CNOT assertion.
  2. [Description of the CNOT implementation] The manuscript states that the symmetry qubit remains coherent and is perfectly coupled to direction by the four-port, yet provides no quantitative bound on mode mismatch, loss, or residual amplitudes that would appear in a physical implementation; without this, the unit-probability claim cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to 'programmable devices' but does not specify the control mechanism (phase shifters, tunable couplers, etc.) or the number of additional components required to switch between the listed gates.
  2. Notation for the symmetry-encoded states |ij>_sym is introduced without an explicit definition of the two-photon symmetrization operator or the mapping from spatial modes to logical labels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for acknowledging the conceptual contribution of the symmetry-based encoding. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below. The revised manuscript incorporates an explicit unitary calculation and additional discussion of ideal versus practical conditions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and main proposal] The central claim (abstract and main text) asserts that the Grover four-port unitary maps each two-photon symmetry-encoded computational basis state |ij>_sym exactly onto the CNOT output |i, i⊕j>_sym with total probability 1 and zero amplitude outside the logical subspace. No explicit 4-mode unitary restricted to the symmetrized two-photon states, nor any matrix-element calculation demonstrating closure of the logical subspace, is supplied; this is the load-bearing step for the deterministic-CNOT assertion.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit restriction of the Grover four-port unitary to the two-photon symmetrized subspace, together with the matrix elements on the logical basis, is required to substantiate the unit-probability claim. The original manuscript invoked the known symmetry-to-direction coupling property of the Grover multiport but did not display the restricted 4-mode two-photon operator. In the revised version we have added a dedicated subsection that constructs the two-photon unitary from the four-port scattering matrix, restricts it to the even/odd parity subspace, and tabulates the action on the four computational states |00>_sym, |01>_sym, |10>_sym, |11>_sym, confirming that each maps exactly to the CNOT output with total probability 1 and zero leakage. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Description of the CNOT implementation] The manuscript states that the symmetry qubit remains coherent and is perfectly coupled to direction by the four-port, yet provides no quantitative bound on mode mismatch, loss, or residual amplitudes that would appear in a physical implementation; without this, the unit-probability claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The present work is a theoretical proposal that assumes ideal, lossless linear-optical elements and perfect spatial-mode overlap. Under these conditions the unitary calculation now supplied demonstrates unit fidelity and perfect coherence preservation. We have added a paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly states the ideal-case assumption and notes that any real device will suffer from mode mismatch, propagation loss, and imperfect indistinguishability, all of which would reduce fidelity and introduce leakage; quantitative error bounds necessarily depend on specific experimental parameters and lie outside the scope of this manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation combines prior port property with independent encoding

full rationale

The paper's central construction starts from a previously established property of the Grover four-port (coupling spatial symmetry to propagation direction) and introduces a distinct symmetry-based qubit definition based on even/odd parity. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain whose validity is assumed without external support. The mapping to deterministic CNOT is presented as a direct consequence of the new encoding applied to the known port unitary, without renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the prior demonstration that Grover four-ports couple spatial symmetry to propagation direction and on the assumption that ideal linear-optical components preserve the symmetry encoding.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Grover four-ports couple spatial symmetry of a photon to its direction of travel as previously shown.
    Invoked directly in the abstract as the foundation for the new gate behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5408 in / 1071 out tokens · 35351 ms · 2026-05-10T18:40:29.951164+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In: Chan, Y.W., Leung, A.F., Yang, C.N., Young, K

    Yamamoto, Y., Kitagawa, M., Igeta, K.: Quantum solitons in optical fibers. In: Chan, Y.W., Leung, A.F., Yang, C.N., Young, K. (eds.) Proc. 3rd Asia-P acific Physics Conf., pp. 779–799. World Scientific, Singapore (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Milburn, G.J.: Quantum optical fredkin gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2124 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2124

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.2124 1989

  3. [3]

    Chuang, I.L., Yamamoto, Y.: Simple quantum computer. Phys. Rev . A 52, 3489 23 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3489

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3489 1995

  4. [4]

    Fortschr

    d’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C., Maccone, L.: Quantum computation s with polarized photons. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 573–577 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Howell, J.C., Yeazell, J.A.: Quantum computation through entangling sin- gle photons in multipath interferometers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 198 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.198

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.198 2000

  6. [6]

    Hutchinson, G.D., Milburn, G.J.: Nonlinear quantum optical computing via measurement. J. Mod. Opt. 51, 1211 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340408230417

    work page doi:10.1080/09500340408230417 2004

  7. [7]

    Nature 409, 46 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/35051009

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Milburn, G.J.: A scheme for efficient quantum co mputa- tion with linear optics. Nature 409, 46 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/35051009

    work page doi:10.1038/35051009 2001

  8. [8]

    Pittman, T.B., Jacobs, B.C., Franson, J.D.: Probabilistic quantum log ic oper- ations using polarizing beam splitters. Phys. Rev. A 64, 062311 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.062311 2001

  9. [9]

    Ralph, T.C., Langford, N.K., Bell, T.B., White, A.G.: Linear optical controlled-not gate in the coincidence basis. Phys. Rev. A 65, 062324 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.062324

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.062324 2002

  10. [10]

    Nature 426, 264 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02054

    O’Brien, J.L., Pryde, G.J., White, A.G., Ralph, T.C., Branning, D.: Demo n- stration of an all-optical quantum controlled-not gate. Nature 426, 264 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02054

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02054 2003

  11. [11]

    Gasparoni, S., Pan, J., Walther, P., T., R., Zeilinger, A.: Realization o f a pho- tonic controlled-not gate sufficient for quantum computation. Phy s. Rev. Lett. 93, 020504 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.020504 24

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.020504 2004

  12. [12]

    Hazra, S., Mukhopadhyay, S.: Two-dimensional photonic cryst al based optical cnot gate. Opt. and Quant. Elect. 55, 961 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05228-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11082-023-05228-3 2023

  13. [13]

    Raussendorf, R., Briegel, H.J.: A one-way quantum computer. P hys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 2001

  14. [14]

    Yoran, N., Reznik, B.: Deterministic linear optics quantum comput a- tion with single photon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 037903 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037903

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.037903 2003

  15. [15]

    Nielsen, M.A.: Quantum computation using cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040503 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040503 2004

  16. [16]

    Browne, D.E., Rudolph, T.: Resource-efficient linear opti- cal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010501 2005

  17. [17]

    Gilchrist, A., Hayes, A.J.F., Ralph, T.C.: Efficient parity-encoded optical quantum computing. Phys. Rev. A 75, 052328 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.052328

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.75.052328 2007

  18. [18]

    Stolz, T., Hegels, H., Winter, M.e.a.: Quantum-logic gate between t wo optical photons with an average efficiency above 40%. Phys. Rev. X 12, 021035 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.021035 2022

  19. [19]

    : Controlled-not operation of sin-photonic circuit using photon pairs from silicon-photonic circuit

    Lee, J.M., Lee, W.J., Kim, M.S., et al. : Controlled-not operation of sin-photonic circuit using photon pairs from silicon-photonic circuit. Opt. Comm. 509, 127863 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127863 25

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127863 2021

  20. [20]

    : Quantum logical controlled-not gate in a lithium niobate- on-insulator photonic quantum walk

    Chapman, R.J., et al. : Quantum logical controlled-not gate in a lithium niobate- on-insulator photonic quantum walk. Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 015016 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad0a48

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad0a48 2024

  21. [21]

    Quantum 8, 1342 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-05-13-1342

    Du, F.F., Fan, G., Ren, X.M.: Kerr-effect-based quantum logi- cal gates in decoherence-free subspace. Quantum 8, 1342 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-05-13-1342

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2024-05-13-1342 2024

  22. [22]

    Advanced Qua ntum Tech- nology 8, 2500167 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202500167

    Fan, G., Niu, H.Z., Tan, Q.L., Du, F.F.: A computation-enhanced high - dimensional quantum gate for silicon-vacancy spins. Advanced Qua ntum Tech- nology 8, 2500167 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202500167

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202500167 2025

  23. [23]

    Cerf, N.J., Adami, C., Kwiat, P.G.: Optical simulation of quantum logic . Phys. Rev. A 57, 1477 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.R1477

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.57.r1477 1998

  24. [24]

    Howell, J.C., Yeazell, J.A.: Reducing the complexity of lin- ear optics quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052303 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052303

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.61.052303 2000

  25. [25]

    Englert, B.G., Kurtsiefer, C., Weinfurter, H.: Universal unitary gate for single-photon two-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 63, 032303 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032303

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.63.032303 2001

  26. [26]

    Simon, D.S., Fitzpatrick, C.A., Sergienko, A.V.: Group trans- formations and entangled-state quantum gates with directionally unbiased linear-optical multiports. Phys. Rev. A 93, 043845 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.043845

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.043845 2016

  27. [27]

    Osawa, S., Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Experimental demonstra tion of directionally-unbiased linear-optical multiport. Opt. Expr. 26, 27201 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.027201 26

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.26.027201 2018

  28. [28]

    Kim, I., Lee, D., Hong, S., Cho, Y.W., Lee, K.J., Kim, Y.S., Lim, H.T.: Imple - mentation of a 3 × 3 directionally-unbiased linear optical multiport. Opt. Expr. 29, 29527 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.436075

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.436075 2021

  29. [29]

    Boada, O., Celi, A., Latorre, J.I., Lewenstein, M.: Dirac equation f or cold atoms in artificial curved spacetimes. New J. Phys. 13, 035002 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/035002

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/035002 2011

  30. [30]

    Commun Phys 7, 143 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01636-3

    Arguuello-Luengo, J., Bhattacharya, U., Celi, A.e.a.: Synthetic d imen- sions for topological and quantum phases. Commun Phys 7, 143 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01636-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01636-3 2024

  31. [31]

    Optica 5, 1396 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001396

    Yuan, L., Lin, Q., Xiao, M., Fan, S.: Synthetic dimension in photonics . Optica 5, 1396 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001396

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.5.001396 2018

  32. [32]

    Celi, A., Massignan, P., Ruseckas, J., Goldman, N., Spielman, I.B., Ju zeliunas, G., Lewenstein, M.: Synthetic gauge fields in synthetic dimensions. Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043001 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.043001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.043001 2014

  33. [33]

    Nature Communicat ions 13, 972 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28550-y

    Kanungo, S.K., Whalen, J.D., Lu, Y., Yuan, M., Dasgupta, S., Dunnin g, F.B., Hazzard, K.R.A., Killian, T.C.: Realizing su-schrieffer-heeger topologica l edge states in rydberg-atom synthetic dimensions. Nature Communicat ions 13, 972 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28550-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28550-y 2022

  34. [34]

    Optics Express 24, 15429 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.015429

    He, L.Y., Wang, T.J., Wang, C.: Construction of high-dimensional u ni- versal quantum logic gates using a λ system coupling with a whis- pering gallery-mode microresonator. Optics Express 24, 15429 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.015429

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.24.015429 2016

  35. [35]

    : Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional hilbert spaces

    Lanyon, B.P., Barbieri, M., Almeida, M.P., et al. : Simplifying quantum logic using higher-dimensional hilbert spaces. Nature Physics 5, 134 (2009) 27 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1150

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1150 2009

  36. [36]

    Physical Review Le tters 125, 050501 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.050501

    Gao, X., Erhard, M., Zeilinger, A., Krenn, M.: Computer-inspired c oncept for higher-dimensional multipartite quantum gates. Physical Review Le tters 125, 050501 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.050501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.050501 2020

  37. [37]

    : High-dimensional single-photon quantum gates: concepts and experiments

    Babazadeh, A., Erhard, M., Wang, F., et al. : High-dimensional single-photon quantum gates: concepts and experiments. Physical Review Lett ers 119, 180510 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180510

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180510 2017

  38. [38]

    Physical Review A 103, 052601 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.052601

    Gong, N.F., Wang, T.J., Ghose, S.: Control power of a high-dimens ional con- trolled nonlocal quantum computation. Physical Review A 103, 052601 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.052601

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052601 2021

  39. [39]

    New Journal of Physics 22, 063026 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab8e13

    Liu, W.Q., Wei, H.R.: Optimal synthesis of the fredkin gate in a multilevel system. New Journal of Physics 22, 063026 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab8e13

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab8e13 2020

  40. [40]

    Entropy 21, 853 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/e21090853

    Osawa, S., Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Directionally-unbiased unit ary optical devices in discrete-time quantum walks. Entropy 21, 853 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/e21090853

    work page doi:10.3390/e21090853 2019

  41. [41]

    Osawa, S., Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Investigation of direction al and directionally-unbiased devices in linear optics for quantum walk applica tions. Proc. of SPIE 11134, 111340 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2527915

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2527915 2019

  42. [42]

    Schwarze, C.R., Simon, D.S., Manni, A.D., Ndao, A., Sergienko, A.V.: E xperi- mental demonstration of a grover-michelson interferometer. Op t. Expr. 32, 34116 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.532364

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.532364 2024

  43. [43]

    Manni, Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Single-pho ton 28 description of the lossless optical y coupler

    Schwarze, C.R., A.D. Manni, Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Single-pho ton 28 description of the lossless optical y coupler. Phys. Rev. A 110, 023527 (024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.023527

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.023527

  44. [44]

    Grover, L.K.: Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 1997

  45. [45]

    Quantum random walks: an introductory overview

    Kempe, J.: Quantum random walks - an introductory overview. C ontemp. Phys. 44, 307 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776

    work page doi:10.1080/00107151031000110776 2003

  46. [46]

    Osawa, S., Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Controllable entangled sta te distribution in a dual-rail reconfigurable optical network. Phys. Rev. A 104, 012617 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.012617

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.104.012617 2021

  47. [47]

    Osawa, S., Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Higher-dimensional hong- ou- mandel effect with linear multiports. Phys. Rev. A 102, 063712 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.063712

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.063712 2020

  48. [48]

    Simon, D.S., Schwarze, C., Sergienko, A.V.: Interferometry and higher- dimensional phase measurements using directionally unbiased linear o ptics. Phys. Rev. A 106, 033706 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033706

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.033706 2022

  49. [49]

    Schwarze, C.R., Simon, D.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Enhanced-sensitivit y interferome- try with phase-sensitive unbiased multiports. Phys. Rev. A 107, 052615 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.052615

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.052615 2023

  50. [50]

    Optics Continuum 4, 1266–1278 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTCON.546829

    Wei, C.P., Xu, C.G., Liu, Q.: Phase sensitivity of a modified grover- michelson interferometer. Optics Continuum 4, 1266–1278 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTCON.546829

    work page doi:10.1364/optcon.546829 2025

  51. [51]

    Physica l Review D 112, 29 122002 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/8h71-w8tt

    Manni, A., Schwarze, C.R., Simon, D.S., Ndao, A., Sergienko, A.V.: St rain sensi- tivity enhancement in a grover-michelson interferometer. Physica l Review D 112, 29 122002 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/8h71-w8tt

    work page doi:10.1103/8h71-w8tt 2025

  52. [52]

    Zukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M.A.: Realizable higher-dimension al two- particle entanglements via multiport beam splitters. Phys. Rev. A 55, 2564 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2564

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.55.2564 1997

  53. [53]

    Simon, D.S., Osawa, S., Sergienko, A.V.: Quantum-clustered two- photon walks. Phys. Rev. A 101, 032118 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.032118

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032118 2020

  54. [54]

    Hong, C.K., Ou, Z.Y., Mandel, L.: Measurement of subpicosecond t ime inter- vals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044 30

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 2044