Exact Solution for Current-Driven Domain-Wall Dynamics Beyond Lorentz Contraction in Antiferromagnets with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction

Masahito Mochizuki; Mu-Kun Lee; Rub\'en M. Otxoa

arxiv: 2604.06730 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Exact Solution for Current-Driven Domain-Wall Dynamics Beyond Lorentz Contraction in Antiferromagnets with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction

Mu-Kun Lee , Rub\'en M. Otxoa , Masahito Mochizuki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords antiferromagnetsdomain wallsDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionspin-transfer torquespin-orbit torquecurrent-driven dynamicsspiral domain walls

0 comments

The pith

An exact analytical solution shows that Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction produces constant-velocity domain wall motion and unconventional width changes with current in antiferromagnets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an exact analytical solution for the dynamics of spiral domain walls driven by electric current in antiferromagnets that include Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. The solution holds when the magnetic easy axis aligns with the DMI vector and covers both bulk and interfacial cases relevant to synthetic antiferromagnets. It shows that nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque produces steady domain wall motion at constant speed while damping-like spin-orbit torque causes continuous rotation of the wall tilt angle. The domain wall width then changes with current either by steady elongation or by contraction followed by elongation, depending on the damping and torque parameters. This behavior differs from the Lorentz-type contraction found in antiferromagnetic domain walls without DMI and supplies a precise description for modeling such systems.

Core claim

We obtain an exact analytical solution for spiral DW dynamics in AFMs with DMI. For the experimentally relevant case of up-down DWs under interfacial DMI in synthetic AFMs with in-plane anisotropy, the solution predicts a constant DW velocity driven by nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque together with a steady rotation of the DW tilt angle induced by damping-like spin-orbit torque. The DW width shows unconventional current dependence, either pure elongation or contraction followed by elongation depending on damping and torque parameters, in sharp contrast to the Lorentz-type contraction known for AF DWs without DMI.

What carries the argument

the exact analytical solution for the spiral domain wall configuration under simultaneous spin-transfer and spin-orbit torques

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The constant velocity and rotating tilt could produce time-periodic signals useful for high-speed antiferromagnetic devices.
The specific width dependence offers a measurable signature to extract DMI strength from transport experiments.
The solution may be extended to time-varying currents to predict oscillatory wall motion not treated here.
Material choices that satisfy the easy-axis alignment condition become preferred candidates for testing the predicted dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic easy axis must be aligned with the DMI vector for the spiral domain wall to admit this exact solution.

What would settle it

Measure domain wall width versus applied current density in a synthetic antiferromagnet with interfacial DMI and check whether the dependence matches the predicted pattern of steady elongation or initial contraction followed by elongation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06730 by Masahito Mochizuki, Mu-Kun Lee, Rub\'en M. Otxoa.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: shows ∆ and Γ versus je for α = 0.1 [1], β = 1.5α, fso = 0, a0 = 1 nm, tL = 10a0, p = 0.5, Ms = 0.5 MA/m, A = AAF = 6.5 pJ/m with JAF = a0AAF, K = 0.1 MJ/m3 , and D = 0.6 mJ/m2 (D2 < 2AK in this case). For various θSH, Γ increases monotonically with current in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: shows numerical solutions of je at which ∆ becomes minimal as a function of β/α, marking the transition between contraction and elongation of ∆. Using d± derived in the SM from the curvature of ∆ at je = 0, when D2 < 2AK, ∆ contracts and then elongates for β/α > d+ or β/α < d− for each θSH, whereas only elongation occurs for d− < β/α < d+, consistent with the absence of numerical solutions for minimal ∆ … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study current-driven domain-wall (DW) dynamics in antiferromagnets (AFMs) with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI). We obtain an exact analytical solution for spiral DW dynamics, applicable to both head-to-head DWs under bulk DMI and up-down DWs under interfacial DMI when the magnetic easy axis is aligned with the DMI vector. For the latter case experimentally relevant to synthetic AFMs with in-plane anisotropy, the solution predicts a constant DW velocity driven by nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque together with a steady rotation of the DW tilt angle induced by damping-like spin-orbit torque. Remarkably, the DW width shows unconventional current dependence, either pure elongation or contraction followed by elongation depending on damping and torque parameters, in sharp contrast to the Lorentz-type contraction known for antiferromagnetic (AF) DWs without DMI. These results provide an exact description of current-driven AF-DW dynamics and suggest experimentally accessible signatures of DMI-modified DW dynamics in synthetic AFMs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives an exact analytical solution for spiral domain walls in antiferromagnets with DMI that produces constant velocity plus a new current-dependent width that can elongate rather than contract.

read the letter

The core result is an exact solution for current-driven spiral domain-wall motion in antiferromagnets that include Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. When the easy axis lines up with the DMI vector, the solution covers both bulk and interfacial cases and yields constant wall velocity from nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque together with steady tilt-angle rotation from damping-like spin-orbit torque. The wall width then shows either steady elongation or an initial contraction followed by elongation, depending on the damping and torque values. That behavior is the clear departure from the Lorentz contraction seen in antiferromagnetic walls without DMI.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an exact analytical solution for the current-driven dynamics of spiral domain walls in antiferromagnets with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI). The solution applies when the magnetic easy axis aligns with the DMI vector, covering head-to-head walls under bulk DMI and up-down walls under interfacial DMI. It predicts a constant domain-wall velocity driven by nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque, a steady rotation of the wall tilt angle induced by damping-like spin-orbit torque, and an unconventional current dependence of the wall width (pure elongation or contraction followed by elongation, depending on damping and torque parameters), in contrast to the Lorentz-type contraction for DMI-free antiferromagnetic walls.

Significance. If the exactness of the solution is confirmed, the work supplies a rare closed-form description of nonlinear domain-wall motion in chiral antiferromagnets that incorporates both spin-transfer and spin-orbit torques. This yields clear, falsifiable predictions for velocity, tilt rotation, and width evolution that could serve as benchmarks for micromagnetic simulations and guide experiments in synthetic antiferromagnets with in-plane anisotropy.

major comments (1)

[Section presenting the analytical solution and ansatz substitution] The central claim is that a specific spiral DW ansatz with current-dependent width Δ(J) and time-dependent tilt satisfies the full nonlinear AFM equations of motion identically. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate this by direct substitution of the ansatz (including all DMI, nonadiabatic STT, and damping-like SOT terms) into the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations and show that residual torques and forces vanish for arbitrary current; without this verification the solution cannot be certified as exact rather than approximate.

minor comments (2)

[Results and discussion] Clarify the precise range of damping and torque parameters that produce pure elongation versus contraction-then-elongation behavior, ideally with a brief parameter-space diagram or limiting-case analysis.
[Introduction] The abstract and introduction state applicability to both bulk and interfacial DMI cases; add a short paragraph explicitly contrasting the two configurations and any additional assumptions required for the interfacial case in synthetic AFMs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We appreciate the recognition of the potential impact of our exact solution for domain-wall dynamics in chiral antiferromagnets. We address the major comment as follows.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section presenting the analytical solution and ansatz substitution] The central claim is that a specific spiral DW ansatz with current-dependent width Δ(J) and time-dependent tilt satisfies the full nonlinear AFM equations of motion identically. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate this by direct substitution of the ansatz (including all DMI, nonadiabatic STT, and damping-like SOT terms) into the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations and show that residual torques and forces vanish for arbitrary current; without this verification the solution cannot be certified as exact rather than approximate.

Authors: We fully agree that explicit verification through direct substitution is necessary to establish the exact nature of the solution. Upon re-examination, while the manuscript derives the conditions under which the ansatz satisfies the equations, the full algebraic details of the substitution were condensed. In the revised version, we will add a detailed appendix or expanded section that performs the complete substitution of the spiral DW ansatz into the AFM LLG equations, explicitly including the contributions from DMI, nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque, and damping-like spin-orbit torque. We will demonstrate that all residual torques and forces cancel identically for arbitrary current, confirming the exactness of the solution. This revision will not change the physical results but will enhance the transparency of the derivation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: exact solution derived directly from AFM equations with DMI and torques

full rationale

The paper introduces a spiral domain-wall ansatz and substitutes it into the coupled nonlinear PDEs obtained from the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics augmented by DMI, nonadiabatic STT, and damping-like SOT. The resulting algebraic conditions on velocity, tilt rotation rate, and current-dependent width are solved without reducing any output quantity to a fitted input or to a prior self-citation. The contrast to Lorentz contraction arises as a direct consequence of the DMI term in the solved profile, not by construction or renaming. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated equations of motion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Without the full manuscript, specific free parameters cannot be enumerated beyond the general dependence on damping and torque strengths mentioned in the abstract. The work relies on standard micromagnetic assumptions rather than introducing new entities.

free parameters (1)

damping and torque parameters
The unconventional width dependence is stated to depend on these parameters, which are treated as inputs that determine elongation versus contraction behavior.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics with added spin-transfer and spin-orbit torques plus DMI term
The exact solution is obtained by solving the micromagnetic equations under the stated conditions; these equations are standard background in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1472 out tokens · 58241 ms · 2026-05-10T18:03:34.972820+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We obtain an exact analytical solution for spiral DW dynamics... the DW width shows unconventional current dependence, either pure elongation or contraction followed by elongation... in sharp contrast to the Lorentz-type contraction
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

γv = sqrt(1−(v−u)²/c²) ... Δ(v) = γv sqrt(A / (K − D²/(4A γv²)))

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

[1]

with the total magnetic energy given by W = R d3x[P j H2(Mj)+ (JAF/a3 0)MA · MB], where JAF denotes the interlayer AF exchange coupling, and Ms is the saturation magnetiza- tion. The torque term Tj includes adiabatic and nonadi- abatic STTs [56–59], as well as damping-like and field-like SOTs, which is given by, Tj = −uM′ j + βuMj × M′ j + ucHMj × Mj × ˆy...

work page
[2]

Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell, Princeton uni- versity press (2010)

A. Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell, Princeton uni- versity press (2010)

work page 2010
[3]

Lancaster and S

T. Lancaster and S. J. Blundell, Quantum field theory for the gifted amateur. OUP Oxford (2014)

work page 2014
[4]

Tatara, H

G. Tatara, H. Kohno, and J. Shibata, Microscopic ap- proach to current-driven domain wall dynamics, Phys. Rep. 468, 213 (2008)

work page 2008
[5]

H. B. Braun, Topological effects in nanomagnetism: From superparamagnetism to chiral quantum solitons, Adv. Phys. 61, 1 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas, Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory, Science 320, 190 (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

D. A. Allwood, G. Xiong, C. C. Faulkner, D. Atkinson, D. Petit, and R. P. Cowburn, Magnetic domain-wall logic, Science 309, 1688 (2005)

work page 2005
[8]

Z. Luo, A. Hrabec, T. P. Dao, G. Sala, S. Finizio, J. Feng, S. Mayr, J. Raabe, P. Gambardella, and L. J. Heyderman, Current-driven magnetic domain-wall logic, Nature 579, 214 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

R. V. Ababei, M. O. A. Ellis, I. T. Vidamour, D. S. De- vadasan, D. A. Allwood, E. Vasilaki, and T. J. Hayward, Neuromorphic computation with a single magnetic domain wall, Sci. Rep. 11, 15587 (2021)

work page 2021
[10]

J. A. Vélez, M.-K. Lee, G. Tatara, P.-I. Gavriloaea, J. Ross, D. Laroze, U. Atxitia, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, M. Mochizuki, and R. M. Otxoa, Chaotic pro- liferation of relativistic domain walls for reservoir comput- ing, npj Spintronics 3, 14 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

Godinho, P

J. Godinho, P. K. Rout, R. Salikhov, O. Hellwig, Z. Šobáň, R. M. Otxoa, K. Olejník, T. Jungwirth, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic domain wall memory with neuromorphic functionality, npj Spintronics 2, 39 (2024)

work page 2024
[12]

Jungwirth, X

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

E. V. Gomonay and V. M. Loktev, Spintronics of anti- ferromagnetic systems, Low Temp. Phys. 40, 17 (2014)

work page 2014
[14]

F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis Néel state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153 (1983)

work page 1983
[15]

S. K. Kim, Y. Tserkovnyak, and O. Tchernyshyov, Propulsion of a domain wall in an antiferromagnet by magnons, Phys. Rev. B 90, 104406 (2014)

work page 2014
[16]

Tatara, C

G. Tatara, C. A. Akosa, and R. M. Otxoa de Zuazola, Magnon pair emission from a relativistic domain wall in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043226 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

Shiino, S.-H

T. Shiino, S.-H. Oh, P. M. Haney, S.-W. Lee, G. Go, B.- G. Park, and K.-J. Lee, Antiferromagnetic domain wall motion driven by spin-orbit torques, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 087203 (2016)

work page 2016
[18]

R. M. Otxoa, U. Atxitia, P. E. Roy, and O. Chubykalo- Fesenko, Giant localised spin-Peltier effect due to ultrafast domain wall motion in antiferromagnetic metals, Com- mun. Phys. 3, 31 (2020)

work page 2020
[19]

Caretta, S.-H

L. Caretta, S.-H. Oh, T. Fakhrul, D.-K. Lee, B. H. Lee, S. K. Kim, C. A. Ross, K.-J. Lee, and G. S. D. Beach, Relativistic kinematics of a magnetic soliton, Science 370, 1438 (2020)

work page 2020
[20]

Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

work page 1958
[21]

Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

work page 1960
[22]

O. A. Tretiakov and A. Abanov, Current Driven Mag- netization Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanowires with a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 157201 (2010)

work page 2010
[23]

W. Wang, M. Albert, M. Beg, M.-A. Bisotti, D. Chernyshenko, D. Cortés-Ortuño, I. Hawke, and H. Fangohr, Magnon-driven domain-wall motion with the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 087203 (2015)

work page 2015
[24]

Nagaosa and Y

N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013)

work page 2013
[25]

Seki and M

S. Seki and M. Mochizuki, Skyrmions in Magnetic Mate- rials (Springer, Switzerland, 2015)

work page 2015
[26]

Everschor-Sitte, J

K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui, Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions: Overview of recent progress in an active research field, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901 (2018)

work page 2018
[27]

Ohki and M

Y. Ohki and M. Mochizuki, Fundamental theory of current-induced motion of magnetic skyrmions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37, 023003 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

M.-K. Lee, J. A. Vélez, R. M. Otxoa, and M. Mochizuki, Skyrmion Hall effect and shape deformation of current- driven bilayer skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 184402 (2025)

work page 2025
[29]

A. A. Thiele, Steady-state motion of magnetic domains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 230 (1973). 6

work page 1973
[30]

Thiaville, Y

A. Thiaville, Y. Nakatani, J. Miltat, and Y. Suzuki, Mi- cromagnetic understanding of current-driven domain wall motion in patterned nanowires, Europhys. Lett. 69, 990 (2005)

work page 2005
[31]

S.-W. Jung, W. Kim, T.-D. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and H.-W. Lee, Current-induced domain wall motion in a nanowire with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 202508 (2008)

work page 2008
[32]

Mougin, M

A. Mougin, M. Cormier, J. P. Adam, P. J. Metaxas, and J. Ferré, Domain wall mobility, stability and Walker breakdown in magnetic nanowires, Europhys. Lett. 78, 57007 (2007)

work page 2007
[33]

J. Yang, C. Nistor, G. S. D. Beach, and J. L. Erskine, Magnetic domain-wall velocity oscillations in permalloy nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 77, 014413 (2008)

work page 2008
[34]

R. M. Otxoa, P. E. Roy, R. Rama-Eiroa, J. Godinho, K. Y. Guslienko, and J. Wunderlich, Walker-like domain wall breakdown in layered antiferromagnets driven by stag- gered spin–orbit fields, Commun. Phys. 3, 190 (2020)

work page 2020
[36]

S. H. Yang, K. S. Ryu, and S. Parkin, Domain-wall ve- locities of up to 750 m s −1 driven by exchange-coupling torque in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 221 (2015)

work page 2015
[37]

S. H. Yang and S. Parkin, Novel domain wall dynamics in synthetic antiferromagnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 303001 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

C. Bi, H. Almasi, K. Price, T. Newhouse-Illige, M. Xu, S. R. Allen, X. Fan, and W. Wang, Anomalous spin-orbit torque switching in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 104434 (2017)

work page 2017
[40]

Mallick, N

S. Mallick, N. Reyren, A. Thiaville, P. Ohresser, N. Jaouen, V. Cros, and V. Jeudy, Effects of antiferromag- netic coupling and pinning on domain wall dynamics in synthetic ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014437 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

Y. M. Hung, Y. Shiota, S. Yamada, M. Ohta, T. Shibata, T. Sasaki, R. Hisatomi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Posi- tive correlation between interlayer exchange coupling and the driving current of domain wall motion in a synthetic antiferromagnet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 032407 (2021)

work page 2021
[42]

K. Wang, V. Bheemarasetty, and G. Xiao, Spin textures in synthetic antiferromagnets: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions, APL Mater. 11, 070902 (2023)

work page 2023
[43]

Saarikoski, H

H. Saarikoski, H. Kohno, C. H. Marrows, and G. Tatara, Current-driven dynamics of coupled domain walls in a syn- thetic antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 90, 094411 (2014)

work page 2014
[44]

Haltz, S

E. Haltz, S. Krishnia, L. Berges, A. Mougin, and J. Sam- paio, Domain wall dynamics in antiferromagnetically cou- pled double-lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014444 (2021)

work page 2021
[45]

A. N. Bogdanov, U. K. Rößler, M. Wolf, and K.-H. Müller, Magnetic structures and reorientation transitions in noncentrosymmetric uniaxial antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 66, 214410 (2002)

work page 2002
[46]

Velkov, O

H. Velkov, O. Gomonay, M. Beens, G. Schwiete, A. Brataas, J. Sinova, and R. A. Duine, Phenomenology of current-induced skyrmion motion in antiferromagnets, New J. Phys. 18, 075016 (2016)

work page 2016
[47]

Brataas, A

A. Brataas, A. D. Kent, and H. Ohno, Current-induced torques in magnetic materials, Nat. Mater. 11, 372 (2012)

work page 2012
[48]

J. E. Hirsch, Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999)

work page 1999
[49]

Sinova, D

J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jung- wirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Universal Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603 (2004)

work page 2004
[50]

Manchon, J

A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

work page 2019
[51]

Manchon and S

A. Manchon and S. Zhang, Theory of nonequilibrium in- trinsic spin torque in a single nanomagnet, Phys. Rev. B 78, 212405 (2008)

work page 2008
[52]

Manchon and S

A. Manchon and S. Zhang, Theory of spin torque due to spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094422 (2009)

work page 2009
[53]

Kikuchi, T

T. Kikuchi, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, and G. Tatara, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction as a consequence of a Doppler shift due to spin-orbit-induced intrinsic spin cur- rent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247201 (2016)

work page 2016
[54]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bod- ies, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 153 (1935)

work page 1935
[55]

T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004)

work page 2004
[56]

J. C. Slonczewski, Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1-L7 (1996)

work page 1996
[57]

Zhang and Z

S. Zhang and Z. Li, Roles of nonequilibrium conduction electrons on the magnetization dynamics of ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004)

work page 2004
[58]

Tatara, H

G. Tatara, H. Kohno, J. Shibata, Y. Lemaho, and K.-J. Lee, Spin torque and force due to current for general spin textures, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 054707 (2007)

work page 2007
[59]

Tatara and H

G. Tatara and H. Kohno, Theory of current-driven do- main wall motion: Spin transfer versus momentum trans- fer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 086601 (2004)

work page 2004
[60]

Berger, Exchange interaction between ferromagnetic domain wall and electric current in very thin metallic films, J

L. Berger, Exchange interaction between ferromagnetic domain wall and electric current in very thin metallic films, J. Appl. Phys. 55 (1984)

work page 1984
[61]

Krishnia, P

S. Krishnia, P. Sethi, W. L. Gan, F. N. Kholid, I. Pur- nama, M. Ramu, T. S. Herng, J. Ding, and W. S. Lew, Role of RKKY torque on domain wall motion in synthetic antiferromagnetic nanowires with opposite spin Hall an- gles, Sci. Rep. 7, 11715 (2017)

work page 2017
[62]

L. Chen, M. Shen, Y. Peng, X. Liu, W. Luo, X. Yang, L. You, and Y. Zhang, Voltage-induced high-speed DW motion in a synthetic antiferromagnet, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 495001 (2019)

work page 2019
[63]

C. A. Akosa, M.-K. Lee, A. Manchon, and M. Mochizuki, unpublished

work page
[64]

Bhukta, T

M. Bhukta, T. Dohi, V. K. Bharadwaj, R. Zarzuela, M.-A. Syskaki, M. Foerster, M. A. Ni no, J. Sinova, R. Frömter, and M. Kläui, Homochiral antiferromagnetic merons, antimerons and bimerons realized in synthetic an- tiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 1641 (2024)

work page 2024
[65]

Takubo, K

K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, Y. Yokoyama, Y. Kubota, S. Yamamoto, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, S. Shin, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, and H. Wadati, Capturing ultrafast magnetic dynamics by time-resolved soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 162401 (2017). 7 Supplemental Material: Exact Solution for Current-Driven Domain-Wall Dynamics ...

work page 2017
[66]

S. H. Yang, K. S. Ryu, and S. Parkin, Domain-wall velocities of up to 750 m s −1 driven by exchange-coupling torque in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 221 (2015)

work page 2015
[67]

R. A. Duine, K.-J. Lee, S. S. P. Parkin, and M. D. Stiles, Synthetic antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 217 (2018)

work page 2018
[68]

M.-K. Lee, J. A. Vélez, R. M. Otxoa, and M. Mochizuki, Skyrmion Hall effect and shape deformation of current-driven bilayer skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 184402 (2025)

work page 2025
[69]

M.-K. Lee, R. M. Otxoa, and M. Mochizuki, Predicted multiple Walker breakdowns for current-driven domain wall motion in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B, 110, L020408 (2024)

work page 2024
[70]

Takubo, K

K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, Y. Yokoyama, Y. Kubota, S. Yamamoto, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, S. Shin, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, and H. Wadati, Capturing ultrafast magnetic dynamics by time-resolved soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 162401 (2017)

work page 2017

[1] [1]

with the total magnetic energy given by W = R d3x[P j H2(Mj)+ (JAF/a3 0)MA · MB], where JAF denotes the interlayer AF exchange coupling, and Ms is the saturation magnetiza- tion. The torque term Tj includes adiabatic and nonadi- abatic STTs [56–59], as well as damping-like and field-like SOTs, which is given by, Tj = −uM′ j + βuMj × M′ j + ucHMj × Mj × ˆy...

work page

[2] [2]

Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell, Princeton uni- versity press (2010)

A. Zee, Quantum field theory in a nutshell, Princeton uni- versity press (2010)

work page 2010

[3] [3]

Lancaster and S

T. Lancaster and S. J. Blundell, Quantum field theory for the gifted amateur. OUP Oxford (2014)

work page 2014

[4] [4]

Tatara, H

G. Tatara, H. Kohno, and J. Shibata, Microscopic ap- proach to current-driven domain wall dynamics, Phys. Rep. 468, 213 (2008)

work page 2008

[5] [5]

H. B. Braun, Topological effects in nanomagnetism: From superparamagnetism to chiral quantum solitons, Adv. Phys. 61, 1 (2012)

work page 2012

[6] [6]

S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas, Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory, Science 320, 190 (2008)

work page 2008

[7] [7]

D. A. Allwood, G. Xiong, C. C. Faulkner, D. Atkinson, D. Petit, and R. P. Cowburn, Magnetic domain-wall logic, Science 309, 1688 (2005)

work page 2005

[8] [8]

Z. Luo, A. Hrabec, T. P. Dao, G. Sala, S. Finizio, J. Feng, S. Mayr, J. Raabe, P. Gambardella, and L. J. Heyderman, Current-driven magnetic domain-wall logic, Nature 579, 214 (2020)

work page 2020

[9] [9]

R. V. Ababei, M. O. A. Ellis, I. T. Vidamour, D. S. De- vadasan, D. A. Allwood, E. Vasilaki, and T. J. Hayward, Neuromorphic computation with a single magnetic domain wall, Sci. Rep. 11, 15587 (2021)

work page 2021

[10] [10]

J. A. Vélez, M.-K. Lee, G. Tatara, P.-I. Gavriloaea, J. Ross, D. Laroze, U. Atxitia, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, M. Mochizuki, and R. M. Otxoa, Chaotic pro- liferation of relativistic domain walls for reservoir comput- ing, npj Spintronics 3, 14 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

Godinho, P

J. Godinho, P. K. Rout, R. Salikhov, O. Hellwig, Z. Šobáň, R. M. Otxoa, K. Olejník, T. Jungwirth, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic domain wall memory with neuromorphic functionality, npj Spintronics 2, 39 (2024)

work page 2024

[12] [12]

Jungwirth, X

T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016)

work page 2016

[13] [13]

E. V. Gomonay and V. M. Loktev, Spintronics of anti- ferromagnetic systems, Low Temp. Phys. 40, 17 (2014)

work page 2014

[14] [14]

F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis Néel state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153 (1983)

work page 1983

[15] [15]

S. K. Kim, Y. Tserkovnyak, and O. Tchernyshyov, Propulsion of a domain wall in an antiferromagnet by magnons, Phys. Rev. B 90, 104406 (2014)

work page 2014

[16] [16]

Tatara, C

G. Tatara, C. A. Akosa, and R. M. Otxoa de Zuazola, Magnon pair emission from a relativistic domain wall in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043226 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Shiino, S.-H

T. Shiino, S.-H. Oh, P. M. Haney, S.-W. Lee, G. Go, B.- G. Park, and K.-J. Lee, Antiferromagnetic domain wall motion driven by spin-orbit torques, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 087203 (2016)

work page 2016

[18] [18]

R. M. Otxoa, U. Atxitia, P. E. Roy, and O. Chubykalo- Fesenko, Giant localised spin-Peltier effect due to ultrafast domain wall motion in antiferromagnetic metals, Com- mun. Phys. 3, 31 (2020)

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Caretta, S.-H

L. Caretta, S.-H. Oh, T. Fakhrul, D.-K. Lee, B. H. Lee, S. K. Kim, C. A. Ross, K.-J. Lee, and G. S. D. Beach, Relativistic kinematics of a magnetic soliton, Science 370, 1438 (2020)

work page 2020

[20] [20]

Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958)

work page 1958

[21] [21]

Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

work page 1960

[22] [22]

O. A. Tretiakov and A. Abanov, Current Driven Mag- netization Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nanowires with a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 157201 (2010)

work page 2010

[23] [23]

W. Wang, M. Albert, M. Beg, M.-A. Bisotti, D. Chernyshenko, D. Cortés-Ortuño, I. Hawke, and H. Fangohr, Magnon-driven domain-wall motion with the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 087203 (2015)

work page 2015

[24] [24]

Nagaosa and Y

N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013)

work page 2013

[25] [25]

Seki and M

S. Seki and M. Mochizuki, Skyrmions in Magnetic Mate- rials (Springer, Switzerland, 2015)

work page 2015

[26] [26]

Everschor-Sitte, J

K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui, Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions: Overview of recent progress in an active research field, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901 (2018)

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Ohki and M

Y. Ohki and M. Mochizuki, Fundamental theory of current-induced motion of magnetic skyrmions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37, 023003 (2025)

work page 2025

[28] [28]

M.-K. Lee, J. A. Vélez, R. M. Otxoa, and M. Mochizuki, Skyrmion Hall effect and shape deformation of current- driven bilayer skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 184402 (2025)

work page 2025

[29] [29]

A. A. Thiele, Steady-state motion of magnetic domains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 230 (1973). 6

work page 1973

[30] [30]

Thiaville, Y

A. Thiaville, Y. Nakatani, J. Miltat, and Y. Suzuki, Mi- cromagnetic understanding of current-driven domain wall motion in patterned nanowires, Europhys. Lett. 69, 990 (2005)

work page 2005

[31] [31]

S.-W. Jung, W. Kim, T.-D. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and H.-W. Lee, Current-induced domain wall motion in a nanowire with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 202508 (2008)

work page 2008

[32] [32]

Mougin, M

A. Mougin, M. Cormier, J. P. Adam, P. J. Metaxas, and J. Ferré, Domain wall mobility, stability and Walker breakdown in magnetic nanowires, Europhys. Lett. 78, 57007 (2007)

work page 2007

[33] [33]

J. Yang, C. Nistor, G. S. D. Beach, and J. L. Erskine, Magnetic domain-wall velocity oscillations in permalloy nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 77, 014413 (2008)

work page 2008

[34] [34]

R. M. Otxoa, P. E. Roy, R. Rama-Eiroa, J. Godinho, K. Y. Guslienko, and J. Wunderlich, Walker-like domain wall breakdown in layered antiferromagnets driven by stag- gered spin–orbit fields, Commun. Phys. 3, 190 (2020)

work page 2020

[35] [36]

S. H. Yang, K. S. Ryu, and S. Parkin, Domain-wall ve- locities of up to 750 m s −1 driven by exchange-coupling torque in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 221 (2015)

work page 2015

[36] [37]

S. H. Yang and S. Parkin, Novel domain wall dynamics in synthetic antiferromagnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 303001 (2017)

work page 2017

[37] [39]

C. Bi, H. Almasi, K. Price, T. Newhouse-Illige, M. Xu, S. R. Allen, X. Fan, and W. Wang, Anomalous spin-orbit torque switching in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 104434 (2017)

work page 2017

[38] [40]

Mallick, N

S. Mallick, N. Reyren, A. Thiaville, P. Ohresser, N. Jaouen, V. Cros, and V. Jeudy, Effects of antiferromag- netic coupling and pinning on domain wall dynamics in synthetic ferrimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014437 (2025)

work page 2025

[39] [41]

Y. M. Hung, Y. Shiota, S. Yamada, M. Ohta, T. Shibata, T. Sasaki, R. Hisatomi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Posi- tive correlation between interlayer exchange coupling and the driving current of domain wall motion in a synthetic antiferromagnet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 032407 (2021)

work page 2021

[40] [42]

K. Wang, V. Bheemarasetty, and G. Xiao, Spin textures in synthetic antiferromagnets: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions, APL Mater. 11, 070902 (2023)

work page 2023

[41] [43]

Saarikoski, H

H. Saarikoski, H. Kohno, C. H. Marrows, and G. Tatara, Current-driven dynamics of coupled domain walls in a syn- thetic antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 90, 094411 (2014)

work page 2014

[42] [44]

Haltz, S

E. Haltz, S. Krishnia, L. Berges, A. Mougin, and J. Sam- paio, Domain wall dynamics in antiferromagnetically cou- pled double-lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014444 (2021)

work page 2021

[43] [45]

A. N. Bogdanov, U. K. Rößler, M. Wolf, and K.-H. Müller, Magnetic structures and reorientation transitions in noncentrosymmetric uniaxial antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 66, 214410 (2002)

work page 2002

[44] [46]

Velkov, O

H. Velkov, O. Gomonay, M. Beens, G. Schwiete, A. Brataas, J. Sinova, and R. A. Duine, Phenomenology of current-induced skyrmion motion in antiferromagnets, New J. Phys. 18, 075016 (2016)

work page 2016

[45] [47]

Brataas, A

A. Brataas, A. D. Kent, and H. Ohno, Current-induced torques in magnetic materials, Nat. Mater. 11, 372 (2012)

work page 2012

[46] [48]

J. E. Hirsch, Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999)

work page 1999

[47] [49]

Sinova, D

J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jung- wirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Universal Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603 (2004)

work page 2004

[48] [50]

Manchon, J

A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

work page 2019

[49] [51]

Manchon and S

A. Manchon and S. Zhang, Theory of nonequilibrium in- trinsic spin torque in a single nanomagnet, Phys. Rev. B 78, 212405 (2008)

work page 2008

[50] [52]

Manchon and S

A. Manchon and S. Zhang, Theory of spin torque due to spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094422 (2009)

work page 2009

[51] [53]

Kikuchi, T

T. Kikuchi, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, and G. Tatara, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction as a consequence of a Doppler shift due to spin-orbit-induced intrinsic spin cur- rent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247201 (2016)

work page 2016

[52] [54]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bod- ies, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 153 (1935)

work page 1935

[53] [55]

T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004)

work page 2004

[54] [56]

J. C. Slonczewski, Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1-L7 (1996)

work page 1996

[55] [57]

Zhang and Z

S. Zhang and Z. Li, Roles of nonequilibrium conduction electrons on the magnetization dynamics of ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004)

work page 2004

[56] [58]

Tatara, H

G. Tatara, H. Kohno, J. Shibata, Y. Lemaho, and K.-J. Lee, Spin torque and force due to current for general spin textures, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 054707 (2007)

work page 2007

[57] [59]

Tatara and H

G. Tatara and H. Kohno, Theory of current-driven do- main wall motion: Spin transfer versus momentum trans- fer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 086601 (2004)

work page 2004

[58] [60]

Berger, Exchange interaction between ferromagnetic domain wall and electric current in very thin metallic films, J

L. Berger, Exchange interaction between ferromagnetic domain wall and electric current in very thin metallic films, J. Appl. Phys. 55 (1984)

work page 1984

[59] [61]

Krishnia, P

S. Krishnia, P. Sethi, W. L. Gan, F. N. Kholid, I. Pur- nama, M. Ramu, T. S. Herng, J. Ding, and W. S. Lew, Role of RKKY torque on domain wall motion in synthetic antiferromagnetic nanowires with opposite spin Hall an- gles, Sci. Rep. 7, 11715 (2017)

work page 2017

[60] [62]

L. Chen, M. Shen, Y. Peng, X. Liu, W. Luo, X. Yang, L. You, and Y. Zhang, Voltage-induced high-speed DW motion in a synthetic antiferromagnet, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 495001 (2019)

work page 2019

[61] [63]

C. A. Akosa, M.-K. Lee, A. Manchon, and M. Mochizuki, unpublished

work page

[62] [64]

Bhukta, T

M. Bhukta, T. Dohi, V. K. Bharadwaj, R. Zarzuela, M.-A. Syskaki, M. Foerster, M. A. Ni no, J. Sinova, R. Frömter, and M. Kläui, Homochiral antiferromagnetic merons, antimerons and bimerons realized in synthetic an- tiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 1641 (2024)

work page 2024

[63] [65]

Takubo, K

K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, Y. Yokoyama, Y. Kubota, S. Yamamoto, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, S. Shin, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, and H. Wadati, Capturing ultrafast magnetic dynamics by time-resolved soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 162401 (2017). 7 Supplemental Material: Exact Solution for Current-Driven Domain-Wall Dynamics ...

work page 2017

[64] [66]

S. H. Yang, K. S. Ryu, and S. Parkin, Domain-wall velocities of up to 750 m s −1 driven by exchange-coupling torque in synthetic antiferromagnets, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 221 (2015)

work page 2015

[65] [67]

R. A. Duine, K.-J. Lee, S. S. P. Parkin, and M. D. Stiles, Synthetic antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 14, 217 (2018)

work page 2018

[66] [68]

M.-K. Lee, J. A. Vélez, R. M. Otxoa, and M. Mochizuki, Skyrmion Hall effect and shape deformation of current-driven bilayer skyrmions in synthetic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 184402 (2025)

work page 2025

[67] [69]

M.-K. Lee, R. M. Otxoa, and M. Mochizuki, Predicted multiple Walker breakdowns for current-driven domain wall motion in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B, 110, L020408 (2024)

work page 2024

[68] [70]

Takubo, K

K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, Y. Yokoyama, Y. Kubota, S. Yamamoto, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, S. Shin, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, and H. Wadati, Capturing ultrafast magnetic dynamics by time-resolved soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 162401 (2017)

work page 2017