pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07080 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Phase coherence and disorder-induced wave propagation in micromotor arrays

Romane Braun , Alexis Poncet , Alexandre Morin , Denis Bartolo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords micromotor arraysphase coherencequenched disorderantiferromagnetic phasephase wavesrotary motorsactive matter
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Quenched disorder in rotary motor arrays triggers propagating phase waves between mismatched-speed regions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies large arrays of elastically coupled microscopic rotary motors that self-organize without external programming. Motors with unspecified initial directions first settle into a clean antiferromagnetic state where neighbors precess oppositely. Phase coherence then appears across the array, producing global spatiotemporal order. When quenched disorder is present, this order breaks locally and allows phase waves to travel freely through regions whose rotation speeds differ. A sympathetic reader cares because the setup shows how minimal physical interactions alone can generate biological-like collective behaviors in engineered systems.

Core claim

In arrays of thousands of 3D-printed rotary motors linked by elastic coupling, the rotors spontaneously form a pristine antiferromagnetic phase, develop phase coherence in their precession, and, under quenched disorder, support the free propagation of phase waves across self-organized domains that rotate at different speeds.

What carries the argument

Elastic coupling between the rotary motors, which enforces antiferromagnetic ordering, sustains phase coherence, and permits disorder-induced phase waves when rotation speeds mismatch.

If this is right

  • The antiferromagnetic phase organizes unspecified initial precession directions into stable collective dynamics.
  • Phase coherence supplies global spatiotemporal order without central control.
  • Quenched disorder converts speed mismatches into freely propagating phase waves.
  • The same mechanism offers a route to metachronal-wave formation in synthetic metamachines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Controlling the amount or placement of disorder could allow directed signal routing in larger motor arrays.
  • The same elastic-coupling principle might apply to other active rotors or oscillators to produce waves without added forces.
  • Scaling the array size or varying motor density could test whether wave speed depends only on the disorder pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The elastic links between motors are strong enough on their own to produce the observed antiferromagnetic order and phase coherence without external fields or initial programming.

What would settle it

An experiment in which all motors are forced to identical speeds or the elastic coupling is removed would show whether phase waves still appear under quenched disorder; absence of waves would falsify the claim that disorder initiates propagation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07080 by Alexandre Morin, Alexis Poncet, Denis Bartolo, Romane Braun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Machines are designed, assembled, and programmed to convert power into predetermined dynamics and functions. In contrast, living systems such as interacting cells and animal groups self-organize, synchronize, and perform complex tasks without predefined patterns. Inspired by these decentralized architectures, experiments have shown that small assemblies of elastically coupled self-propelled robots can achieve two fundamental functionalities observed in nature: collective motion and oscillatory deformations. However, biological inspiration has steered research toward translational self-propulsion, while active rotation remains an underexplored route to designing broader animate materials. Here, we study the self-organization of microscopic metamachines composed of thousands of 3D-printed rotary motors. We first demonstrate and explain how motors precessing in unspecified directions collectively arrange their dynamics into a pristine antiferromagnetic phase. Next, we elucidate the emergence of spatiotemporal order in the form of phase coherence in the rotors' precession. Finally, we show how quenched disorder initiates the free propagation of phase waves across self-organized regions with mismatched rotation speeds. Our results suggest that spinner-based metamachines could illuminate metachronal-wave formation in living systems, and signal propagation in synthetic animate materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments and simulations on arrays of thousands of 3D-printed rotary micromotors that are elastically coupled. It demonstrates that motors with initially unspecified precession directions self-organize into a pristine antiferromagnetic phase, develop spatiotemporal phase coherence in their precession, and that the introduction of quenched disorder (regions with mismatched rotation speeds) triggers sustained, free propagation of phase waves across the self-organized domains without further external driving.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work establishes a disorder-driven mechanism for generating metachronal-like waves in rotary active-matter systems, providing a scalable experimental platform for studying decentralized synchronization and signal propagation in synthetic metamaterials. The combination of direct measurements of pairwise elastic interactions, parameter sweeps in the model, and large-scale demonstrations with thousands of motors strengthens the case that elastic coupling alone can stabilize antiferromagnetic order and enable wave emergence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results on antiferromagnetic phase] The section describing the antiferromagnetic ordering (likely the first results subsection) should explicitly quantify the elastic coupling strength relative to the driving torques and any residual noise; without this comparison it remains unclear whether the observed order is robust against small perturbations or requires fine-tuning of the 3D-printed geometry.
  2. [Quenched-disorder wave propagation] In the wave-propagation experiments, the claim that propagation is 'free' (no continuous external driving after the quench) is load-bearing; the manuscript must show time-resolved data confirming that wave speed and coherence persist over many periods once the speed heterogeneity is fixed, with a clear control that removes the disorder and eliminates the waves.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should state the number of motors, the measured coupling constant, and the rotation-speed mismatch values used in each panel to allow direct comparison with the model.
  2. [Methods] The abstract states 'unspecified directions' yet the main text must clarify whether initial directions are truly random or set by fabrication tolerances; a short methods paragraph on fabrication variability would remove ambiguity.
  3. [Theory/Methods] Notation for phase difference and wave vector should be defined once in the text and used consistently; currently the transition from local precession phase to global wave description is abrupt.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results on antiferromagnetic phase] The section describing the antiferromagnetic ordering (likely the first results subsection) should explicitly quantify the elastic coupling strength relative to the driving torques and any residual noise; without this comparison it remains unclear whether the observed order is robust against small perturbations or requires fine-tuning of the 3D-printed geometry.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison is valuable for establishing robustness. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (with supporting figure) that reports the elastic coupling energy extracted from independent pairwise interaction measurements, directly compares it to the driving torques, and estimates residual noise from the observed fluctuations in isolated motors. This will show that the antiferromagnetic order is stable well above the noise floor and does not require fine-tuning. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Quenched-disorder wave propagation] In the wave-propagation experiments, the claim that propagation is 'free' (no continuous external driving after the quench) is load-bearing; the manuscript must show time-resolved data confirming that wave speed and coherence persist over many periods once the speed heterogeneity is fixed, with a clear control that removes the disorder and eliminates the waves.

    Authors: We concur that sustained free propagation must be demonstrated explicitly. The revised version will include extended time series (spanning >20 precession periods) that track wave speed and phase coherence after the quench, together with a control experiment in which the speed heterogeneity is removed while keeping all other conditions fixed; in that control the waves cease, confirming that disorder is required for propagation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental study of self-organization in arrays of 3D-printed rotary motors. It reports direct observations of antiferromagnetic ordering, emergence of phase coherence, and disorder-induced traveling waves, supported by measurements of pairwise interactions and parameter sweeps in a supporting numerical model. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear; all claims rest on physical measurements and controlled experiments rather than equations that reduce to their own inputs by construction. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Work is experimental and relies on established physical principles of active matter and elastic interactions rather than new postulates. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Elastic coupling between motors produces collective antiferromagnetic ordering and phase coherence
    Invoked to explain self-organization of precessing motors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1157 out tokens · 74607 ms · 2026-05-10T17:29:51.116123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    3D Nanoprinting We first design 3D models of the motors using the CAD software Fusion360 (Fig. S1). We then 3D-print micro- motor lattices using two-photon polymerization with a Nanoscribe Photonic Professional GT2 (PPGT2) 3D printer. We print the motors in photosensitive resin SU-8 100 spincoated on fused silica substrates, and enhance the adhesion of th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    S2.Microfluidic chip.Our microfluidic channels are made of double sided tapes

    Microfluidic device 100 µm thick inox electrodes 10 µm thick double sided tape Micro-motors 3D printed on the glass slide Glass-slide E Fluid inlet Fluid outlet FIG. S2.Microfluidic chip.Our microfluidic channels are made of double sided tapes. The two electrodes are made of stainless steel. We place the micromotors in 1 cm wide microfluidic channels (Fig...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Electric setup To actuate our micromotors, we take advantage of the Quincke electrorotation instability, which we briefly recall in the next section [3, 14, 18]

    Quincke motorization setup and principle 3.1 . Electric setup To actuate our micromotors, we take advantage of the Quincke electrorotation instability, which we briefly recall in the next section [3, 14, 18]. Using a voltage amplifier (TREK 610E), we apply an electric fieldEtransverse to the electrodes and parallel to one of the axes of the micromotor net...

    work page

  4. [4]

    S4.Tracking of the rotor phase and speed

    Measurements of the instantaneous phase and angular velocity rφ rθ,i θ1 θ2 θ4 θ3 b φa rφ rφ ex ey FIG. S4.Tracking of the rotor phase and speed. a.To measure the instantaneous phaseφ(t)we need to measure the instantaneous center of mass (pink dot) of the rotor and its time average (blue dot).b.We measure the instantaneous rotation angleθby detecting the p...

    work page

  5. [5]

    For each geometry, and each value ofℓ, we repeated ten independent experiments

    Experimental Protocols AntiferromagneticorderTocharacterizetheemergenceofantiferromagneticorderasthelatticespacingℓdecreases, we conducted experiments both on lattices made of 20×11 small motors, and on 13×12 large motors. For each geometry, and each value ofℓ, we repeated ten independent experiments. The order parameterΩplotted in Fig. 2a in the main tex...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The motors being powered by the Quincke instability, controlling their rotation speed amounts to controlling the magnitude of the electric field

    Geometric control of the motor speed We here describe a practical method to control the spatial variations of the motor speed. The motors being powered by the Quincke instability, controlling their rotation speed amounts to controlling the magnitude of the electric field. To achieve a local control ofEwe take advantage of the Ohmic transport in the microc...

    work page

  7. [7]

    S8.a.Sketch of the three states of the motor dynamics: Arrested, Spinning, Precession.b.E= 0.6E Q: The motors do not rotate

    Quincke electrotation of micromotors: spin and precession FIG. S8.a.Sketch of the three states of the motor dynamics: Arrested, Spinning, Precession.b.E= 0.6E Q: The motors do not rotate. Electrophoresis drives the rotors towards the stators.c.E= 1.3EQ: Above the onset of electro-rotation, the rotors are centered and spin at a constant rate.d.E= 2.1E Q: A...

    work page

  8. [8]

    On average, the precession angleφ(t)increases linearly with time and is controlled byE(Fig

    Modulation of the precession dynamics Before explaining this variety of dynamics, it is worth taking a closer look at the precession regime. On average, the precession angleφ(t)increases linearly with time and is controlled byE(Fig. S8g). However the instantaneous value ofω= ˙φ(t)is not constant. Even when a rotor is isolated,ωfluctuates periodically arou...

    work page

  9. [9]

    On the sole basis of our measurements, we can however pinpoint the physical phenomena that rule the transition from 10 FIG

    Origins of the spinning and hula-hoop dynamics Providing a quantitative and predictive theory of single motor dynamics goes beyond the scope of our article. On the sole basis of our measurements, we can however pinpoint the physical phenomena that rule the transition from 10 FIG. S10.Dielectrophoresis centers the rotor’s position aA single rotor immersed ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    [14, 16] for more details

    Quincke electro-rotation instability: a primer We first briefly recall how to model the dynamics of a single Quincke rotor, see for instance Ref. [14, 16] for more details. We consider a rotor, an axisymmetric body, immersed in a conducting fluid. Both the solid body and the fluid are weak Ohmic conductors and have a finite electric permittivity. We negle...

    work page

  11. [11]

    aat7nB40Y2F1T8a0Q6yt/ZbsEoY=

    Two coupled rotors 2.1 . How do Quincke spinners respond to torques? Before addressing the dynamics of coupled motors, we can gain some insight by considering a simpler situation where a single Quincke motor responds to an imposed constant torque. The dynamics then obeys the rescaled overdamped equations: dΠx dt∗ = ΩΠy −Π x (S11) dΠy dt∗ = Ω(ρ−Π x)−Π y (S...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Rather, we seek to highlight the types of dynamics and interactions that can give rise to a collective phase organization

    A Minimal Model: coupled phase oscillators Our goal is not to model in detail all the specifics of our experiments. Rather, we seek to highlight the types of dynamics and interactions that can give rise to a collective phase organization. To this end, we adopt a minimal approach inspired by models developed to study the synchronization of beating cilia in...

    work page

  13. [13]

    Precession at constant speed: Dipolar interactions induce phase coherence We first disregard the modulation of the precession speed measured for isolated motors and takeτ1 =−τ 2 =τ 0. In our experiments the rotors are in principle coupled by three types of interactions: (i) radial repulsive forces: these include both contact interactions, and electrostati...

    work page

  14. [14]

    (Fig. S14b). Accordingly, we assume that the first micromotor, rotating counterclockwise, carries a dipolep1 with angleδ >0, whereas the second micromotor, rotating clockwise, carries a dipolep2 with angle−δ, with|p 1|=|p 2|. The interaction potential between the two particles located atr1 andr 2 is then given by: U∝ − 1 r3 21 [3(p1 · ˆr21)(p2 · ˆr21)−p 1...

    work page

  15. [15]

    S15b and S15c

    We find that the equations of motion take the form: ˙φ1 = 1− C r′3 21 ℓ a sin (α−φ 1) + sin (φ2 −φ 1) (S28) ˙φ2 =−1 + C r′3 21 ℓ a sin (α−φ 2) + sin (φ2 −φ 1) ,(S29) whereCa positive constant controlling the amplitude of the interactions, and r′ 21 = ℓ a cosα+ (cosφ 2 −cosφ 1) 2 + ℓ a sinα+ (sinφ 2 −sinφ 1) 2 1/2 .(S30) We numerically solve these two equa...

    work page

  16. [16]

    In section III2 we have shown that the fluctuations of the rotation speed has a two-fold symmetry

    Twofold-modulated drive: impact of hydrodynamic interactions on phase coherence Earlier studies have shown that hydrodynamic interactions can effectively synchronize the phase of driven colloids and beating microcilia when their oscillation pattern is modulated [2, 4, 9, 15, 23, 24]. In section III2 we have shown that the fluctuations of the rotation spee...

    work page

  17. [17]

    We focus on coupled motors whose directions of rotation self-organize into an ordered antiferromagnetic state, as in our experiments

    How to shape the phase-coherent states of phase-oscillator lattices We close this section with a more general discussion on the phase coherent states accessible to metamachines. We focus on coupled motors whose directions of rotation self-organize into an ordered antiferromagnetic state, as in our experiments. Beyond the specifics of our system, a broader...

    work page

  18. [18]

    S20 an additional experimental observation that discards contact interactions as the primary source of phase coherence

    Synchronization without contact interactions We report in Fig. S20 an additional experimental observation that discards contact interactions as the primary source of phase coherence. When the lattice spacing is too large to yield pristine AF order, ordered domains remains (see Figure 2 in the main text). In those domains, we find that the motors precessio...

    work page

  19. [19]

    These oscillations at the same frequency as the average rotation speedω0 do not require the rotation speed to be modulated

    Oscillations of the phase sum in steady state Figure 3b in the main text shows that¯φ(t)oscillates around the mean value¯φ(t) =π. These oscillations at the same frequency as the average rotation speedω0 do not require the rotation speed to be modulated. To see this, 23 we simulate the dynamics of a pair of rotors with constant natural frequencies±ω0, and ...

    work page

  20. [20]

    Informed by our previous analysis we focus on a minimal model where pointwise oscillators are only coupled via dipolar interactions

    Phase coherence in homogeneous motor lattices To guide our numerical investigation, we first inspect the role of the lattice spacingℓand dipole strengthBon the self-organization of10×10lattices (Figure S22). Informed by our previous analysis we focus on a minimal model where pointwise oscillators are only coupled via dipolar interactions. We impose a perf...

    work page

  21. [21]

    The equations of motion take the same form: 0 =−γa˙φi +τ i + X j̸=i τji,(S42) but theτ i are now quenched random variables

    Disorder in rotation speeds as a source of waves To assess the impact of disorder, we introduce noise in the driving torques of the motors. The equations of motion take the same form: 0 =−γa˙φi +τ i + X j̸=i τji,(S42) but theτ i are now quenched random variables. The sign ofτi alternates on each site to account for antiferromagnetic ordering, buttheir amp...

    work page

  22. [22]

    Figure VI22.2 shows that the wave spectra are identical for open, rigid and periodic boundary conditions

    The boundary conditions do not impact the wave spectra In order to assess whether the phase-wave patterns depends on the boundary conditions at the edges of the motor lattices, we performed three series of numerical simulations changing the type of boundary conditions and keeping all the other parameters identical. Figure VI22.2 shows that the wave spectr...

    work page

  23. [23]

    We initialize the system in a perfectly coherent state and induce two distinct velocity domains by imposing two different driving torques in the halves of the lattice (Fig

    Wave Generation Mechanism To elucidate the mechanism behind wave generation, we perform simplified one-dimensional simulations with dipolar interactions and periodic boundary conditions (Lattice size: 100×6). We initialize the system in a perfectly coherent state and induce two distinct velocity domains by imposing two different driving torques in the hal...

    work page

  24. [24]

    Within this approximation, we will show that the modified phase differenceδφ⋆ is a slow variable whose dynamics is diffusive

    Long wave-length dynamics ofδφ ⋆: emergence of phase waves from domain walls To gain more insight into the propagation of phase waves from the boundaries of the ordered domains, we provide a long-wave-length approximation of the minimal model developed in Section V1. Within this approximation, we will show that the modified phase differenceδφ⋆ is a slow v...

    work page

  25. [25]

    J. A. Acebrón, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. Pérez Vicente, F. Ritort, and R. Spigler. The kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena.Rev. Mod. Phys., 77:137–185, Apr 2005

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    S. Box, L. Debono, D. Phillips, and S. Simpson. Transitional behavior in hydrodynamically coupled oscillators.Physical Review E, 91(2):022916, 2015. 30

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Bricard, J.-B

    A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, and D. Bartolo. Emergence of macroscopic directed motion in populations of motile colloids.Nature, 503(7474):95–98, nov 2013

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    D. R. Brumley, M. Polin, T. J. Pedley, and R. E. Goldstein. Metachronal waves in the flagellar beating of volvox and their hydrodynamic origin.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(108):20141358, 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Ceron, G

    S. Ceron, G. Gardi, K. Petersen, and M. Sitti. Programmable self-organization of heterogeneous microrobot collectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(24):e2221913120, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Y.-C. Chao, S. Gokhale, L. Lin, A. Hastewell, A. Bacanu, Y. Chen, J. Li, J. Liu, H. Lee, J. Dunkel, et al. Selective excitation of work-generating cycles in nonreciprocal living solids.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18017, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    M. F. Hsu, E. R. Dufresne, and D. A. Weitz. Charge stabilization in nonpolar solvents.Langmuir, 21(11):4881–4887, 2005

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Kim and S

    S. Kim and S. J. Karrila.Microhydrodynamics: principles and selected applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Kotar, L

    J. Kotar, L. Debono, N. Bruot, S. Box, D. Phillips, S. Simpson, S. Hanna, and P. Cicuta. Optimal hydrodynamic synchronization of colloidal rotors.Physical review letters, 111(22):228103, 2013

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Kuramoto

    Y. Kuramoto. Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear oscillators. InInternational symposium on math- ematical problems in theoretical physics: January 23–29, 1975, kyoto university, kyoto/Japan, pages 420–422. Springer, 1975

    work page 1975

  35. [35]

    Kuramoto and Y

    Y. Kuramoto and Y. Kuramoto.Chemical turbulence. Springer, 1984

    work page 1984

  36. [36]

    K. A. Materials. Omnicoat. 2020

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    K. A. Materials. Su-8 permanent negative epoxy photoresist. 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Melcher and G

    J. Melcher and G. Taylor. Electrohydrodynamics: a review of the role of interfacial shear stresses.Annual review of fluid mechanics, 1(1):111–146, 1969

    work page 1969

  39. [39]

    F. Meng, R. R. Bennett, N. Uchida, and R. Golestanian. Conditions for metachronal coordination in arrays of model cilia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32):e2102828118, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Peters, L

    F. Peters, L. Lobry, and E. Lemaire. Experimental observation of Lorenz chaos in the Quincke rotor dynamics.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 15(1):013102, Mar. 2005

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    G. E. Pradillo, H. Karani, and P. M. Vlahovska. Quincke rotor dynamics in confinement: rolling and hovering.Soft matter, 15(32):6564–6570, 2019

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    G. Quincke. Ueber rotationen im constanten electrischen felde.Annalen der Physik, 295(11):417–486, 1896

    work page

  43. [43]

    Smale, M

    S. Smale, M. W. Hirsch, and R. L. Devaney.Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos. Elsevier Science, 2003

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    G. N. Smith, J. E. Hallett, and J. Eastoe. Celebrating soft matter’s 10th anniversary: Influencing the charge of poly (methyl methacrylate) latexes in nonpolar solvents.Soft Matter, 11(41):8029–8041, 2015

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. Irvine. The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid.Nature physics, 15(11):1188–1194, 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri. Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals.Nature, 607(7918):287–293, 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Uchida and R

    N. Uchida and R. Golestanian. Synchronization and collective dynamics in a carpet of microfluidic rotors.Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:178103, Apr 2010

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Uchida and R

    N. Uchida and R. Golestanian. Generic conditions for hydrodynamic synchronization.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:058104, Feb 2011

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Zhang, H

    B. Zhang, H. Yuan, A. Sokolov, M. O. de la Cruz, and A. Snezhko. Polar state reversal in active fluids.Nature Physics, 18(2):154–159, 2022

    work page 2022