Quantum coherent transceivers toward Holevo-limited communications

Ali Hajimiri; Elianna Kondylis; Suraj Samaga; Volkan Gurses

arxiv: 2604.07087 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🪐 quant-ph · eess.SP· physics.app-ph· physics.optics

Quantum coherent transceivers toward Holevo-limited communications

Volkan Gurses , Suraj Samaga , Elianna Kondylis , Ali Hajimiri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph eess.SPphysics.app-phphysics.optics

keywords quantum communicationcoherent receiversqueezed lightHolevo limitshot noisephotonic integrationquantum-limited detection

0 comments

The pith

An integrated coherent receiver detects squeezing and enables communication beyond the Shannon limit toward the Holevo bound.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates a photonic-electronic coherent receiver that operates at the quantum limit, achieving 14 dB shot noise clearance, high bandwidth, and strong common-mode rejection. It scales the design to a 32-channel array while preserving performance through automatic correction. The receiver is then used with a fiber transmitter to measure 0.15 dB of squeezing, and the authors propose a squeezed-light scheme that can exceed the classical Shannon capacity with a path to the ultimate Holevo limit on quantum channel capacity.

Core claim

We demonstrate an integrated photonic-electronic quantum-limited coherent receiver achieving 14.0 dB shot noise clearance, 520 μW knee power, 2.57 GHz 3-dB bandwidth, 3.50 GHz shot-noise-limited bandwidth, and 90.2 dB CMRR. Scaling this to a 32-channel array gives median 26.6 dB SNC and automatic correction yielding median 76.8 dB CMRR. Using the receiver with a fiber-optic transmitter we measure 0.15 dB squeezing below the shot noise limit, limited by off-chip losses. We propose a squeezed light communication scheme that can surpass the Shannon limit, with a path toward the Holevo limit.

What carries the argument

The integrated photonic-electronic quantum-limited coherent receiver that uses balanced detection to achieve high common-mode rejection and resolve quantum noise reductions below the shot-noise limit.

If this is right

The receiver design supports scaling to multi-channel arrays for parallel quantum communication links.
Detection of squeezing confirms the receiver can perform quantum-state measurements required for Holevo-saturating protocols.
The squeezed-light scheme directly enables channel capacities above the Shannon limit by encoding information in quantum states and using quantum-limited readout.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This receiver architecture could be combined with existing fiber infrastructure to create hybrid systems that increase capacity without requiring entirely new networks.
Reducing on-chip losses would allow the same hardware to demonstrate larger squeezing and closer approach to the Holevo bound in a single experiment.
Automatic CMRR correction in arrays suggests a route to fault-tolerant scaling where individual channel imperfections do not limit overall system performance.

Load-bearing premise

That the measured squeezing is limited only by off-chip losses and that further integration or array scaling will not introduce dominant new noise sources preventing approach to the Holevo capacity.

What would settle it

No detectable squeezing below the shot noise limit when using the integrated receiver, or excess noise in the scaled array that prevents quantum-limited operation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07087 by Ali Hajimiri, Elianna Kondylis, Suraj Samaga, Volkan Gurses.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The Holevo limit bounds the channel capacity of a communication channel in which information is encoded in quantum states in a Hilbert space at the transmitter and decoded using quantum measurements at the receiver. Saturating the Holevo limit requires quantum-limited transceivers that either generate quantum states of light or employ quantum-limited measurements. Here, we demonstrate an integrated photonic-electronic quantum-limited coherent receiver (QRX) achieving 14.0 dB shot noise clearance (SNC), 520 $\mu$W knee power, 2.57 GHz 3-dB bandwidth, 3.50 GHz shot-noise-limited bandwidth, and 90.2 dB common-mode rejection ratio ($\mathrm{CMRR}$). We scale this design to a 32-channel QRX array with median 26.6 dB $\mathrm{SNC}$, and automatic $\mathrm{CMRR}$ correction yielding a median 76.8 dB $\mathrm{CMRR}$ at minimum. Using the integrated QRX and fiber-optic transmitter, we measure $0.15\pm0.01$ dB of squeezing below the shot noise limit, limited by off-chip losses. We propose a squeezed light communication scheme that can surpass the Shannon limit, with a path toward the Holevo limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper delivers practical integrated receiver hardware with strong specs and array scaling, but the 0.15 dB squeezing is loss-limited and does not yet show the device is quantum-limited enough to support the Holevo path.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work gives usable hardware results on an integrated photonic-electronic coherent receiver and its 32-channel version, plus a small squeezing measurement and a conceptual squeezed-light scheme. The numbers on shot noise clearance, bandwidth, and common-mode rejection are concrete and the automatic correction for the array is a practical addition. Scaling to 32 channels while keeping median performance decent shows engineering effort that could matter for multi-channel links. The squeezing measurement of 0.15 dB using the receiver and a fiber transmitter is also reported directly. These are the parts that feel like real progress beyond routine extensions of prior coherent receivers. The integration approach and the auto-CMRR feature stand out as the elements that could be picked up by others building similar systems. The proposal for a squeezed-light scheme that beats the Shannon limit and heads toward Holevo is sketched at the end, which ties the hardware to a bigger goal. The soft spots sit in the quantum-limited claim and the scaling argument. The squeezing result is explicitly limited by off-chip losses, so it does not demonstrate that the receiver's own noise floor sits below shot noise once those losses are removed. Without that, it is hard to see how the array or further integration avoids introducing new noise that would block the path to Holevo capacity. The abstract gives the performance metrics but no detailed loss budget, error bars, or direct comparisons to earlier discrete or integrated receivers, which leaves the quantum-limited assertion only partially supported. The scheme itself stays at the proposal stage with no calculations or data showing how close the current hardware gets. This paper is aimed at experimental groups working on integrated quantum optics or coherent optical communications. A reader focused on hardware design would get value from the reported specs and the array implementation. It deserves a serious referee because the experimental results are tangible and the integration work is relevant, even though the connection to Holevo capacity needs more evidence to hold up. I would send it for review and ask for a clearer loss analysis and noise budgeting in revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, fabrication, and characterization of an integrated photonic-electronic quantum-limited coherent receiver (QRX) achieving 14.0 dB shot-noise clearance, 520 μW knee power, 2.57 GHz 3-dB bandwidth, 3.50 GHz shot-noise-limited bandwidth, and 90.2 dB CMRR. It further demonstrates scaling to a 32-channel QRX array with median 26.6 dB SNC and automatic CMRR correction to a median 76.8 dB, measures 0.15±0.01 dB squeezing (off-chip-loss limited) using the QRX with a fiber-optic transmitter, and proposes a squeezed-light encoding scheme intended to exceed the Shannon limit with a path to the Holevo capacity.

Significance. If the QRX proves intrinsically quantum-limited at the required powers and bandwidths and the array scaling introduces no new dominant noise, the work would provide a practical platform for squeezed-light communications that could meaningfully approach Holevo-limited performance. The integrated photonic-electronic approach and automatic CMRR correction are technically attractive for scalable implementations. However, the current experimental support for the quantum-limited claim remains preliminary.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and squeezing measurement section] Abstract and squeezing measurement section: the reported 0.15 dB squeezing is explicitly limited by off-chip losses; this does not establish that the receiver's intrinsic electronic or integration noise lies below shot noise at the operating powers and bandwidths needed for the proposed scheme. Without a loss-corrected noise budget or on-chip squeezing data, the assertion that the QRX is quantum-limited for Holevo scaling is not yet load-bearing.
[32-channel array results] 32-channel array results: the median 26.6 dB SNC and 76.8 dB CMRR are presented, but no quantitative assessment of channel-to-channel crosstalk, integration-induced excess noise, or how these scale with the 3.5 GHz shot-noise-limited bandwidth is provided. This leaves open whether array operation preserves the margin required to surpass the Shannon limit.

minor comments (2)

[Methods and experimental characterization] The manuscript lacks detailed methods, error bars on all metrics, baseline comparisons to discrete-component receivers, and full data tables, which hinders independent assessment of the reported performance figures.
[Proposal section] The squeezed-light communication proposal is described conceptually but contains no quantitative link (e.g., capacity calculations or simulations) showing how the demonstrated 14 dB SNC, 3.5 GHz bandwidth, and 0.15 dB squeezing translate into a concrete gain over the Shannon limit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their detailed and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments below and will incorporate revisions to improve the clarity and support for our claims regarding the quantum-limited performance of the QRX.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and squeezing measurement section] Abstract and squeezing measurement section: the reported 0.15 dB squeezing is explicitly limited by off-chip losses; this does not establish that the receiver's intrinsic electronic or integration noise lies below shot noise at the operating powers and bandwidths needed for the proposed scheme. Without a loss-corrected noise budget or on-chip squeezing data, the assertion that the QRX is quantum-limited for Holevo scaling is not yet load-bearing.

Authors: We agree with the referee that the measured squeezing of 0.15 dB is limited by off-chip losses, as explicitly noted in the manuscript. Nevertheless, the 14.0 dB shot-noise clearance (SNC) directly quantifies that the receiver's intrinsic electronic noise is 14 dB below the shot-noise level at the relevant operating powers. This provides strong evidence that the QRX operates in the quantum-limited regime for detection. The squeezing measurement validates the receiver's sensitivity to quantum noise, even under lossy conditions. To strengthen this point, we will include a comprehensive loss-corrected noise budget in the revised manuscript, which will break down the noise contributions from off-chip losses, electronic noise, and other factors. While on-chip squeezing data is not available from the current fiber-based transmitter experiments, the demonstrated SNC and bandwidth metrics support the suitability of the QRX for schemes aiming toward the Holevo limit. revision: partial
Referee: [32-channel array results] 32-channel array results: the median 26.6 dB SNC and 76.8 dB CMRR are presented, but no quantitative assessment of channel-to-channel crosstalk, integration-induced excess noise, or how these scale with the 3.5 GHz shot-noise-limited bandwidth is provided. This leaves open whether array operation preserves the margin required to surpass the Shannon limit.

Authors: The median SNC of 26.6 dB in the 32-channel array is notably higher than the single-channel value of 14.0 dB, which indicates that the integration and array scaling did not introduce dominant excess noise. The automatic CMRR correction achieving a median of 76.8 dB further enhances the practicality for scalable implementations. Although a detailed quantitative analysis of channel-to-channel crosstalk and explicit scaling behavior with the 3.5 GHz bandwidth was not included, the consistently high SNC across channels suggests that crosstalk and integration-induced noise remain below the levels that would compromise quantum-limited operation. In the revised manuscript, we will add an analysis of potential crosstalk based on the photonic circuit design and discuss the bandwidth scaling implications to better address the margin for exceeding the Shannon limit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental measurements and conceptual proposal contain no circular derivations

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental results for the QRX device metrics (SNC, bandwidth, CMRR) and a 0.15 dB squeezing measurement, plus a high-level proposal for a squeezed-light scheme. No equations, predictions, or first-principles derivations are presented that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes from the same data. The central claims rest on physical measurements that can be independently verified against external benchmarks, making the work self-contained with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum optics and information theory plus reported experimental measurements; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Quantum states of light can be generated and detected with devices that approach the quantum limit set by shot noise and the Holevo bound
Invoked throughout the QRX demonstration and the proposed squeezed-light scheme.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1366 out tokens · 62209 ms · 2026-05-10T18:07:07.644978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

Giovannetti, S

V. Giovannetti, S. Guha, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, J. H. Shapiro, and H. P. Yuen, Classical capacity of the lossy bosonic channel: The exact solution, Physical Review Letters92, 027902 (2004)

work page 2004
[2]

J. H. Shapiro, The quantum theory of optical commu- nications, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics15, 1547 (2009)

work page 2009
[3]

Guha, Structured optical receivers to attain superaddi- tive capacity and the holevo limit, Physical Review Let- ters106, 240502 (2011)

S. Guha, Structured optical receivers to attain superaddi- tive capacity and the holevo limit, Physical Review Let- ters106, 240502 (2011)

work page 2011
[4]

S. Guha, Z. Dutton, and J. H. Shapiro, On quantum limit of optical communications: Concatenated codes and joint-detection receivers, in2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings(2011) pp. 274–278

work page 2011
[5]

J. Chen, J. L. Habif, Z. Dutton, R. Lazarus, and S. Guha, Optical codeword demodulation with error rates below the standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling receiver, Nature Photonics6, 374 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

C. Cui, J. Postlewaite, B. N. Saif, L. Fan, and S. Guha, Superadditive communication with the green machine as a practical demonstration of nonlocality without entan- glement, Nature Communications16, 3760 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

B. V. Gurses and A. Hajimiri, Performance limits of sub- shot-noise-limited balanced detectors, inFrontiers in Op- tics+Laser Science 2022 (FIO, LS)(Optica Publishing Group, 2022) p. JW4A.32

work page 2022
[8]

Gurses, D

V. Gurses, D. Sarkar, S. Davis, and A. Hajimiri, An in- tegrated photonic-electronic quantum coherent receiver for sub-shot-noise-limited optical links, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2024(Optica Pub- lishing Group, 2024) p. Tu2C.1

work page 2024
[9]

Banaszek, L

K. Banaszek, L. Kunz, M. Jachura, and M. Jarzyna, Quantum limits in optical communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology38, 2741 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

R. E. Slusher and B. Yurke, Squeezed light for coherent communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology8, 466 (1990)

work page 1990
[11]

H. P. Yuen and J. H. Shapiro, Optical communication with two-photon coherent states-part i: Quantum-state propagation and quantum-noise reduction, IEEE Trans- actions on Information Theory24, 657 (1978)

work page 1978
[12]

Chesi, S

G. Chesi, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Squeezing- enhanced phase-shift-keyed binary communication in noisy channels, Physical Review A97, 032315 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Fanizza, M

M. Fanizza, M. Rosati, M. Skotiniotis, J. Calsamiglia, and V. Giovannetti, Squeezing-enhanced communication without a phase reference, Quantum6, 624 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Gurses, S

V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, E. Knabe, R. Valivarthi, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, A compact silicon pho- tonic quantum coherent receiver with deterministic phase control, in2023 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)(2023) pp. 1–2

work page 2023
[15]

J. F. Tasker, J. Frazer, G. Ferranti, E. J. Allen, L. F. Brunel, S. Tanzilli, V. D’Auria, and J. C. F. Matthews, Silicon photonics interfaced with integrated electronics for 9 GHz measurement of squeezed light, Nature Pho- tonics15, 11 (2021)

work page 2021
[16]

J. F. Tasker, B. Sherlock, E. J. Allen, I. Sherborne, L. R. Sherborne, R. Sherwood, S. Sherwood, T. Sherlock, and J. C. F. Matthews, A Bi-CMOS electronic photonic inte- grated circuit quantum light detector, Science Advances 10, eadk6890 (2024)

work page 2024
[17]

Bruynsteen, M

C. Bruynsteen, M. Vanhoecke, J. Bauwelinck, and X. Yin, Integrated balanced homodyne photonic– electronic detector for beyond 20 GHz shot-noise-limited measurements, Optica8, 1146 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

B. V. Gurses, R. Fatemi, A. Khachaturian, and A. Hajimiri, Large-scale crosstalk-corrected thermo-optic phase shifter arrays in silicon photonics, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics28, 1 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Chung, H

S. Chung, H. Abediasl, and H. Hashemi, A monolithically integrated large-scale optical phased array in silicon-on- insulator cmos, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits53, 275 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

Gurses, S

V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, R. Valivarthi, N. Sinclair, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, An on-chip phased ar- ray for non-classical light, Nature Communications16, 6849 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Gurses, S

V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, N. Sinclair, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, Free-space quantum information platform on a chip, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09158 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Gurses, D

V. Gurses, D. Sarkar, A. Khachaturian, and R. Fatemi, A large-scale coherent imager with digital beamforming, in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)(2024)

work page 2024
[23]

A. S. Holevo, Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel, Prob- lemy Peredachi Informatsii9, 3 (1973)

work page 1973
[24]

Gurses, L

V. Gurses, L. Xu, N. Nedovic, B. G. Lee, T. L. Patti, N. Sinclair, C. T. Gray, A. Hajimiri, and W. J. Dally, Fundamental limits of interconnects for high- performance computing, (2026), manuscript in prepa- ration

work page 2026
[25]

Takeoka, M

M. Takeoka, M. Fujiwara, J. Mizuno, and M. Sasaki, Im- plementation of generalized quantum measurements: Su- peradditive quantum coding, accessible information ex- traction, and classical capacity limit, Physical Review A 69, 052329 (2004)

work page 2004
[26]

Gerry and P

C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory quantum optics (Cambridge university press, 2005). [27]4.25-Gbps Transimpedance Amplifier With AGC and RSSI, Texas Instruments (2011)

work page 2005
[27]

J. Lu, M. Li, C.-L. Zou, A. A. Sayem, and H. X. Tang, Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodi- cally poled lithium niobate microring resonators, Optica 7, 1654 (2020)

work page 2020

[1] [1]

Giovannetti, S

V. Giovannetti, S. Guha, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, J. H. Shapiro, and H. P. Yuen, Classical capacity of the lossy bosonic channel: The exact solution, Physical Review Letters92, 027902 (2004)

work page 2004

[2] [2]

J. H. Shapiro, The quantum theory of optical commu- nications, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics15, 1547 (2009)

work page 2009

[3] [3]

Guha, Structured optical receivers to attain superaddi- tive capacity and the holevo limit, Physical Review Let- ters106, 240502 (2011)

S. Guha, Structured optical receivers to attain superaddi- tive capacity and the holevo limit, Physical Review Let- ters106, 240502 (2011)

work page 2011

[4] [4]

S. Guha, Z. Dutton, and J. H. Shapiro, On quantum limit of optical communications: Concatenated codes and joint-detection receivers, in2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings(2011) pp. 274–278

work page 2011

[5] [5]

J. Chen, J. L. Habif, Z. Dutton, R. Lazarus, and S. Guha, Optical codeword demodulation with error rates below the standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling receiver, Nature Photonics6, 374 (2012)

work page 2012

[6] [6]

C. Cui, J. Postlewaite, B. N. Saif, L. Fan, and S. Guha, Superadditive communication with the green machine as a practical demonstration of nonlocality without entan- glement, Nature Communications16, 3760 (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

B. V. Gurses and A. Hajimiri, Performance limits of sub- shot-noise-limited balanced detectors, inFrontiers in Op- tics+Laser Science 2022 (FIO, LS)(Optica Publishing Group, 2022) p. JW4A.32

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Gurses, D

V. Gurses, D. Sarkar, S. Davis, and A. Hajimiri, An in- tegrated photonic-electronic quantum coherent receiver for sub-shot-noise-limited optical links, inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2024(Optica Pub- lishing Group, 2024) p. Tu2C.1

work page 2024

[9] [9]

Banaszek, L

K. Banaszek, L. Kunz, M. Jachura, and M. Jarzyna, Quantum limits in optical communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology38, 2741 (2020)

work page 2020

[10] [10]

R. E. Slusher and B. Yurke, Squeezed light for coherent communications, Journal of Lightwave Technology8, 466 (1990)

work page 1990

[11] [11]

H. P. Yuen and J. H. Shapiro, Optical communication with two-photon coherent states-part i: Quantum-state propagation and quantum-noise reduction, IEEE Trans- actions on Information Theory24, 657 (1978)

work page 1978

[12] [12]

Chesi, S

G. Chesi, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Squeezing- enhanced phase-shift-keyed binary communication in noisy channels, Physical Review A97, 032315 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

Fanizza, M

M. Fanizza, M. Rosati, M. Skotiniotis, J. Calsamiglia, and V. Giovannetti, Squeezing-enhanced communication without a phase reference, Quantum6, 624 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

Gurses, S

V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, E. Knabe, R. Valivarthi, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, A compact silicon pho- tonic quantum coherent receiver with deterministic phase control, in2023 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)(2023) pp. 1–2

work page 2023

[15] [15]

J. F. Tasker, J. Frazer, G. Ferranti, E. J. Allen, L. F. Brunel, S. Tanzilli, V. D’Auria, and J. C. F. Matthews, Silicon photonics interfaced with integrated electronics for 9 GHz measurement of squeezed light, Nature Pho- tonics15, 11 (2021)

work page 2021

[16] [16]

J. F. Tasker, B. Sherlock, E. J. Allen, I. Sherborne, L. R. Sherborne, R. Sherwood, S. Sherwood, T. Sherlock, and J. C. F. Matthews, A Bi-CMOS electronic photonic inte- grated circuit quantum light detector, Science Advances 10, eadk6890 (2024)

work page 2024

[17] [17]

Bruynsteen, M

C. Bruynsteen, M. Vanhoecke, J. Bauwelinck, and X. Yin, Integrated balanced homodyne photonic– electronic detector for beyond 20 GHz shot-noise-limited measurements, Optica8, 1146 (2021)

work page 2021

[18] [18]

B. V. Gurses, R. Fatemi, A. Khachaturian, and A. Hajimiri, Large-scale crosstalk-corrected thermo-optic phase shifter arrays in silicon photonics, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics28, 1 (2022)

work page 2022

[19] [19]

Chung, H

S. Chung, H. Abediasl, and H. Hashemi, A monolithically integrated large-scale optical phased array in silicon-on- insulator cmos, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits53, 275 (2018)

work page 2018

[20] [20]

Gurses, S

V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, R. Valivarthi, N. Sinclair, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, An on-chip phased ar- ray for non-classical light, Nature Communications16, 6849 (2025)

work page 2025

[21] [21]

Gurses, S

V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, N. Sinclair, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, Free-space quantum information platform on a chip, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09158 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024

[22] [22]

Gurses, D

V. Gurses, D. Sarkar, A. Khachaturian, and R. Fatemi, A large-scale coherent imager with digital beamforming, in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)(2024)

work page 2024

[23] [23]

A. S. Holevo, Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel, Prob- lemy Peredachi Informatsii9, 3 (1973)

work page 1973

[24] [24]

Gurses, L

V. Gurses, L. Xu, N. Nedovic, B. G. Lee, T. L. Patti, N. Sinclair, C. T. Gray, A. Hajimiri, and W. J. Dally, Fundamental limits of interconnects for high- performance computing, (2026), manuscript in prepa- ration

work page 2026

[25] [25]

Takeoka, M

M. Takeoka, M. Fujiwara, J. Mizuno, and M. Sasaki, Im- plementation of generalized quantum measurements: Su- peradditive quantum coding, accessible information ex- traction, and classical capacity limit, Physical Review A 69, 052329 (2004)

work page 2004

[26] [26]

Gerry and P

C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory quantum optics (Cambridge university press, 2005). [27]4.25-Gbps Transimpedance Amplifier With AGC and RSSI, Texas Instruments (2011)

work page 2005

[27] [27]

J. Lu, M. Li, C.-L. Zou, A. A. Sayem, and H. X. Tang, Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodi- cally poled lithium niobate microring resonators, Optica 7, 1654 (2020)

work page 2020