pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07206 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Fe3O4 nano-octahedra and SnO2 nanorods modifying low-Pd amount electrocatalysts for alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords alkaline direct ethanol fuel cellsethanol oxidation reactionpalladium electrocatalystsFe3O4 nano-octahedraSnO2 nanorodsbifunctional mechanismmass activitypower density
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fe3O4 nano-octahedra let low-Pd catalysts beat commercial Pd in alkaline ethanol fuel cell output.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests carbon-supported palladium catalysts where Fe3O4 nano-octahedra and SnO2 nanorods replace part of the expensive metal for the ethanol oxidation reaction in alkaline solution. PdFe3O4/C reaches 1426 mA per milligram of Pd in cyclic voltammetry and delivers 31 mW cm-2 power density at 70 C in a working fuel cell, outperforming the commercial Pd/C benchmark even though it uses roughly 45 percent less palladium. The authors link the gains to a bifunctional mechanism in which the oxides assist in clearing reaction intermediates and to electronic interactions that shift palladium's binding energies. Stability measurements used an online scanning flow cell coupled to mass spectrometry. These results matter because they show a concrete route to cheaper direct ethanol fuel cells that still perform well under operating conditions.

Core claim

PdFe3O4/C is the strongest performer among the synthesized materials, with the highest mass activity of 1426 mA mg-1 Pd by cyclic voltammetry, followed by PdSnO2/C at 1135 mA mg-1 Pd and the ternary catalyst at 1074 mA mg-1 Pd. In single-cell alkaline direct ethanol fuel cell tests, PdFe3O4/C produces the highest power density of 31 mW cm-2 at 70 C despite an approximately 45 percent reduction in Pd content relative to the commercial catalyst. XPS data show a 0.5 eV shift of Pd 3d peaks to higher binding energies for the oxide-modified catalysts, indicating electron withdrawal from Pd due to strong metal-oxide interactions that support the bifunctional mechanism and reduce poisoning.

What carries the argument

The bifunctional mechanism supplied by Fe3O4 nano-octahedra and SnO2 nanorods together with the electronic metal-oxide interaction that alters Pd electron density.

If this is right

  • Partial replacement of Pd by Fe3O4 can maintain or exceed commercial catalyst performance in alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells.
  • XPS peak shifts confirm that oxide modifiers withdraw electron density from Pd, consistent with improved tolerance to poisoning.
  • The ternary PdFe3O4SnO2/C combination yields lower activity than the binary PdFe3O4/C, suggesting an optimal oxide pairing.
  • Online SFC-ICP-MS provides a direct way to track metal dissolution during operation for stability assessment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the oxide nanostructures can be produced at scale without losing their shape or interaction strength, fuel-cell costs could drop substantially.
  • The same oxide-modification strategy might be tested on other alcohols or in acidic media to check transferability.
  • Controlling Pd particle size across all samples would isolate the contribution of the bifunctional mechanism from geometric effects.

Load-bearing premise

The measured activity and power-density improvements come mainly from the oxide-enabled bifunctional effect and electronic interactions rather than from differences in palladium particle size, dispersion, or support properties.

What would settle it

A head-to-head test in which PdFe3O4/C and commercial Pd/C are prepared with identical Pd particle sizes, loadings, and carbon supports shows no activity or power-density advantage for the oxide-modified catalyst.

read the original abstract

This work describes the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) in alkaline medium using low-palladium nanoparticle electrocatalysts modified by Fe3O4 nano-octahedra and SnO2 nanorods. Operation studies on an alkaline direct ethanol fuel cell (ADEFC) were conducted using the developed electrocatalysts, and stability studies were performed using the advanced scanning flow cell (SFC) technique coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (online SFC-ICP-MS). The EOR was catalyzed by single (Pd/C and commercial Pd/C Alfa Aesar) and by synthesized binary and ternary electrocatalysts, in which Fe3O4 and SnO2 nanostructures partially replaced the high-cost noble metal. The PdFe3O4/C was identified as the most promising synthesized material in the electrochemical studies, exhibiting the highest mass activity (1426 mA mg-1 Pd) by cyclic voltammetry (CV), followed by the binary PdSnO2/C (1135 mA mg-1 Pd), and by the ternary (1074 mA mg-1 Pd). This enhancement was attributed to the bifunctional mechanism enabled by Fe3O4 and SnO2, therefore reducing poisoning and improving the EOR. Moreover, the operating results revealed that PdFe3O4/C showed the highest power density among the synthesized materials (31 mW cm-2 at 70 C), even with an approximately 45 percent reduction in Pd content compared to the commercial catalyst. XPS results showed that the Pd 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 peaks for PdFe3O4/C, PdSnO2/C, and PdFe3O4SnO2/C were shifted by approximately 0.5 eV to higher binding energies compared to Pd/C, indicating a loss of electron density in Pd due to strong metal-oxide interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of low-Pd electrocatalysts modified with Fe3O4 nano-octahedra and SnO2 nanorods for the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) in alkaline media and their evaluation in alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells (ADEFCs). It claims that PdFe3O4/C delivers the highest mass activity (1426 mA mg^{-1} Pd) by cyclic voltammetry, followed by PdSnO2/C (1135 mA mg^{-1} Pd) and the ternary catalyst (1074 mA mg^{-1} Pd), with PdFe3O4/C also showing the highest power density (31 mW cm^{-2} at 70 °C) despite ~45% lower Pd content than commercial Pd/C. These gains are attributed to a bifunctional mechanism from the oxides and strong metal-oxide electronic interactions, supported by a ~0.5 eV positive shift in Pd 3d XPS peaks. Stability is assessed via online SFC-ICP-MS.

Significance. If the performance improvements are confirmed to stem from the claimed bifunctional and electronic effects rather than dispersion differences, the work would support reduced noble-metal loadings in ADEFCs, a practical step toward cost-effective alkaline fuel cells. The concrete CV mass-activity and power-density numbers, combined with direct dissolution monitoring by SFC-ICP-MS, provide a solid experimental basis; the ~0.5 eV XPS shift offers a quantifiable indicator of interaction that could be tested further.

major comments (2)
  1. [Catalyst characterization and electrochemical testing sections] Catalyst characterization and electrochemical testing sections: the central attribution of the mass-activity ordering (PdFe3O4/C > PdSnO2/C > ternary) and the 31 mW cm^{-2} power density to bifunctional effects plus metal-oxide interaction requires that Pd particle size, dispersion, and ECSA are comparable across all catalysts (including commercial Pd/C). No TEM size distributions, no ECSA values from CO stripping or Hupd, and no statement confirming matched Pd loadings on the electrodes are provided, leaving open the possibility that the reported gains (e.g., 1426 mA mg^{-1} Pd) reflect higher Pd utilization or support effects instead.
  2. [Fuel-cell operation and stability results] Fuel-cell operation and stability results: the claim of superior performance with 45% Pd reduction is load-bearing for the practical significance, yet the text gives no error bars on the 31 mW cm^{-2} value, no replicate counts, and no baseline single-cell data with identical Pd loading for the commercial catalyst, weakening the quantitative comparison.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: '70 C' should read '70 °C' with the proper degree symbol and unit formatting.
  2. [Methods] The manuscript lacks an explicit methods subsection detailing exact synthesis protocols, Pd loading quantification method, and the number of independent replicates for CV and fuel-cell measurements.
  3. [XPS analysis] XPS discussion: the ~0.5 eV shift is reported for Pd 3d5/2 and 3d3/2, but the text does not specify the reference binding energy for metallic Pd or provide peak-fitting details.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have carefully addressed each major point below, providing the strongest possible response consistent with the data in the original work. Where additional information strengthens the claims without misrepresentation, we indicate revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Catalyst characterization and electrochemical testing sections] Catalyst characterization and electrochemical testing sections: the central attribution of the mass-activity ordering (PdFe3O4/C > PdSnO2/C > ternary) and the 31 mW cm^{-2} power density to bifunctional effects plus metal-oxide interaction requires that Pd particle size, dispersion, and ECSA are comparable across all catalysts (including commercial Pd/C). No TEM size distributions, no ECSA values from CO stripping or Hupd, and no statement confirming matched Pd loadings on the electrodes are provided, leaving open the possibility that the reported gains (e.g., 1426 mA mg^{-1} Pd) reflect higher Pd utilization or support effects instead.

    Authors: We agree that comparable Pd particle size, dispersion, and ECSA across catalysts are necessary to support attribution of the mass-activity ordering primarily to bifunctional effects and metal-oxide electronic interactions. In the revised manuscript we have added TEM size-distribution histograms for all catalysts (new Supplementary Figure S3), which show similar average Pd nanoparticle diameters. We have also included ECSA values determined by CO stripping in a revised Table 1. Finally, we have added an explicit statement in the experimental section confirming that Pd loadings on the working electrodes were matched for all samples (including commercial Pd/C) as verified by ICP-OES. These additions allow the observed activity differences and the ~0.5 eV Pd 3d XPS shifts to be more directly linked to the oxide modifiers rather than dispersion variations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fuel-cell operation and stability results] Fuel-cell operation and stability results: the claim of superior performance with 45% Pd reduction is load-bearing for the practical significance, yet the text gives no error bars on the 31 mW cm^{-2} value, no replicate counts, and no baseline single-cell data with identical Pd loading for the commercial catalyst, weakening the quantitative comparison.

    Authors: We acknowledge that error bars, replicate information, and a baseline at matched Pd loading are required for a robust quantitative claim of practical advantage with reduced Pd content. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars to the power-density data in Figure 7, derived from replicate single-cell tests, and we have stated the number of replicates in the figure caption. We have also included polarization curves for the commercial Pd/C catalyst measured at the same reduced Pd loading used for the synthesized materials. These changes provide a direct and statistically supported comparison that reinforces the significance of the ~45% Pd reduction while preserving the original experimental conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurements with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper reports synthesis of low-Pd electrocatalysts (PdFe3O4/C, PdSnO2/C, ternary), direct CV measurements of mass activity (e.g., 1426 mA mg^{-1} Pd), ADEFC power density (31 mW cm^{-2}), XPS binding-energy shifts (~0.5 eV), and stability via online SFC-ICP-MS. No equations, models, ansatze, or predictions appear; all quantities are raw experimental outputs. Attributions to bifunctional mechanism or metal-oxide interactions are post-hoc interpretations of observed data, not reductions to inputs by construction. No self-citations or uniqueness claims load-bear the results. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as direct measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental materials-science study; no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or postulated entities appear in the abstract. All claims rest on synthesis, electrochemical measurements, and spectroscopic characterization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1300 out tokens · 38420 ms · 2026-05-10T17:54:11.463603+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sampaio, L.P

    M.R. Sampaio, L.P. Rosa, M. de A. DAgosto, Ethanol-electric propulsion as a sustainable technological alternative for urban buses in Brazil, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 (2007) 1514–1529. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.007

  2. [2]

    Y. Wang, S. Zou, W. Bin Cai, Recent advances on electro-oxidation of ethanol on Pt- and Pd-based catalysts: From reaction mechanisms to catalytic materials, Catalysts. 5 (2015) 1507–1534. doi:10.3390/catal5031507

  3. [3]

    Kohlhepp, Análise da situação da produção de etanol e biodiesel no Brasil, Estud

    G. Kohlhepp, Análise da situação da produção de etanol e biodiesel no Brasil, Estud. Avançados. 24 (2010) 223–253. doi:10.1590/S0103-40142010000100017

  4. [4]

    Pinheiro, F.M

    V.S. Pinheiro, F.M. Souza, T.C. Gentil, A.N. Nascimento, P. Böhnstedt, L.S. Parreira, E.C. Paz, P. Hammer, M.I. Sairre, B.L. Batista, M.C. Santos, Sn-containing electrocatalysts with a reduced amount of palladium for alkaline direct ethanol fuel cell applications, Renew. Energy. 158 (2020) 49–63. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.050

  5. [5]

    Gentil, V.S

    T.C. Gentil, V.S. Pinheiro, F.M. Souza, M.L. de Araújo, D. Mandelli, B.L. Batista, M.C. dos Santos, Acetol as a high-performance molecule for oxidation in alkaline direct liquid fuel cell, Renew. Energy. 165 (2021) 37–42. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.150

  6. [6]

    Gentil, V

    T. Gentil, V. Pinheiro, E. Paz, F. Souza, L. Parreira, M. Santos, Addition of CeO2 Nanorods in PtSn-Based Electrocatalysts for Ethanol Electrochemical Oxidation in Acid Medium, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 30 (2019) 1634–1646. doi:10.21577/0103-5053.20190062

  7. [7]

    L. An, T.S. Zhao, Y.S. Li, Carbon-neutral sustainable energy technology: Direct ethanol fuel cells, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50 (2015) 1462–1468. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.074

  8. [8]

    K.-Y. Chan, J. Ding, J. Ren, S. Cheng, K.Y. Tsang, Supported mixed metal nanoparticles as electrocatalysts in low temperature fuel cells, J. Mater. Chem. 14 (2004) 505. doi:10.1039/b314224h

  9. [9]

    Akhairi, S.K

    M.A.F. Akhairi, S.K. Kamarudin, Catalysts in direct ethanol fuel cell (DEFC): An overview, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 41 (2016) 4214–4228. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.145

  10. [10]

    Shen, T.S

    S.Y. Shen, T.S. Zhao, Q.X. Wu, Product analysis of the ethanol oxidation reaction on palladium-based catalysts in an anion-exchange membrane fuel cell environment, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37 (2012) 575–582. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.077

  11. [11]

    S. Li, L. Wu, J. Zhao, R. Li, H. Yang, L. Zhao, R. Jin, Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes embedded with nitrogen-doped carbon black anchoring Pd nanocrystals to boost ethanol electrooxidation, Green Chem. 25 (2023) 10033–10042. doi:10.1039/d3gc02801a

  12. [12]

    S. Li, J. Shu, S. Ma, H. Yang, J. Jin, X. Zhang, R. Jin, Engineering three-dimensional nitrogen-doped carbon black embedding nitrogen-doped graphene anchoring ultrafine surface-clean Pd nanoparticles as efficient ethanol oxidation electrocatalyst, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 280 (2021) 119464. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119464

  13. [13]

    J. Li, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, S. Hata, K. Zhang, C. Ye, Y. Shiraishi, Y. Du, Advanced heterostructure of Pd nanosheets@Pt nanoparticles boosts methanol electrooxidation, J. Energy Chem. 85 (2023) 430–438. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2023.06.031

  14. [14]

    J. Li, Z. Zhou, H. Xu, C. Wang, S. Hata, Z. Dai, Y. Shiraishi, Y. Du, In situ nanopores 34 enrichment of Mesh-like palladium nanoplates for bifunctional fuel cell reactions: A joint etching strategy, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 611 (2022) 523–532. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.111

  15. [15]

    J. Li, Y. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Wu, Y. Shiraishi, Y. Du, Interfacial engineering of platinum group metals electrocatalysts for advanced electrocatalysis, Surfaces and Interfaces. 42 (2023) 103360. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103360

  16. [16]

    Moura Souza, L.S

    F. Moura Souza, L.S. Parreira, P. Hammer, B.L. Batista, M.C. Santos, Niobium: a promising Pd co-electrocatalyst for ethanol electrooxidation reactions, J. Solid State Electrochem. 22 (2018) 1495–1506. doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3802-1

  17. [17]

    Makin Adam, A

    A.M. Makin Adam, A. Zhu, L. Ning, M. Deng, Q. Zhang, Q. Liu, Carbon supported PdSn nanocatalysts with enhanced performance for ethanol electrooxidation in alkaline medium, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 20368–20378. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.013

  18. [18]

    Souza, V.S

    F.M. Souza, V.S. Pinheiro, T.C. Gentil, L.E.B. Lucchetti, J.C.M. Silva, M. L.M.G. Santos, I. De Oliveira, W.M.C. Dourado, G. Amaral-Labat, S. Okamoto, M.C. Santos, Alkaline direct liquid fuel cells: Advances, challenges and perspectives, J. Electroanal. Chem. 922 (2022) 116712. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116712

  19. [19]

    dos Santos, L.S

    M.C. dos Santos, L.S. Parreira, F. De Moura Souza, J. Camargo Junior, T. Gentil, Fuel Cells: Hydrogen and Ethanol Technologies, in: Elsevier (Ed.), Ref. Modul. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng., Elsevier, 2017: pp. 1–11. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09263-8

  20. [20]

    https://www.jmbullion.com/

    JM Bullion, (n.d.). https://www.jmbullion.com/

  21. [21]

    Munoz, C

    F. Munoz, C. Hua, T. Kwong, L. Tran, T.Q. Nguyen, J.L. Haan, Palladium – copper electrocatalyst for the promotion of the electrochemical oxidation of polyalcohol fuels in the alkaline direct alcohol fuel cell, "Applied Catal. B, Environ. 174–175 (2015) 323–

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.03.027

  23. [23]

    Zhang, D

    F. Zhang, D. Zhou, M. Zhou, Ethanol electrooxidation on Pd/C nanoparticles in alkaline media, J. Energy Chem. 25 (2016) 71–76. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.013

  24. [24]

    H. Tao, Y. Li, S. Chen, P. Kang, Effect of support on the activity of Pd electrocatalyst for ethanol oxidation, J. Power Sources. 163 (2006) 371–375. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.062

  25. [25]

    (40) Suzuki, N

    O. Ambriz-Peláez, L. Álvarez-Contreras, M. Guerra-Balcázar, J. Ledesma-García, L.G. Arriaga, N. Arjona, Synthesis of a Small Amorphous PdMo/C Nanocatalyst and Pd Nanocubes Enclosed within (100) Planes and Their Use for Ethylene Glycol Electro– oxidation, ChemElectroChem. 4 (2017) 728–737. doi:10.1002/celc.201600856

  26. [26]

    C. Xu, Z. Tian, P. Shen, S.P. Jiang, Oxide (CeO2, NiO, Co3O4 and Mn3O4)-promoted Pd/C electrocatalysts for alcohol electrooxidation in alkaline media, Electrochim. Acta. 53 (2008) 2610–2618. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2007.10.036

  27. [27]

    H.S. Abdo, A. Sarkar, M. Gupta, S. Sahoo, J.A. Mohammed, S.A. Ragab, A.H. Seikh, Low‐cost high‐performance sno2–cu electrodes for use in direct ethanol fuel cells, Crystals. 11 (2021) 1–12. doi:10.3390/cryst11010055

  28. [28]

    Marković, H.A

    N.M. Marković, H.A. Gasteiger, P.N. Ross, X. Jiang, I. Villegas, M.J. Weaver, Electro- oxidation mechanisms of methanol and formic acid on Pt-Ru alloy surfaces, Electrochim. Acta. 40 (1995) 91–98. doi:10.1016/0013-4686(94)00241-R

  29. [29]

    J. Liu, J. Cao, Q. Huang, X. Li, Z. Zou, H. Yang, Methanol oxidation on carbon- supported Pt-Ru-Ni ternary nanoparticle electrocatalysts, J. Power Sources. 175 (2008) 159–165. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.100. 35

  30. [30]

    Souza, J

    F.M. Souza, J. Nandenha, B.L. Batista, V.H.A. Oliveira, V.S. Pinheiro, L.S. Parreira, A.O. Neto, M.C. Santos, PdxNby electrocatalysts for DEFC in alkaline medium: Stability, selectivity and mechanism for EOR, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 43 (2018) 4505–

  31. [31]

    doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.058

  32. [32]

    Modibedi, T

    R.M. Modibedi, T. Masombuka, M.K. Mathe, Carbon supported Pd-Sn and Pd-Ru-Sn nanocatalysts for ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline medium, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 36 (2011) 4664–4672. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.028

  33. [33]

    Shen, T.S

    S.Y. Shen, T.S. Zhao, J.B. Xu, Carbon-supported bimetallic PdIr catalysts for ethanol oxidation in alkaline media, Electrochim. Acta. 55 (2010) 9179–9184. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.018

  34. [34]

    Dutta, S.S

    A. Dutta, S.S. Mahapatra, J. Datta, High performance PtPdAu nano-catalyst for ethanol oxidation in alkaline media for fuel cell applications, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 36 (2011) 14898–14906. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.101

  35. [35]

    Ramulifho, K.I

    T. Ramulifho, K.I. Ozoemena, R.M. Modibedi, C.J. Jafta, M.K. Mathe, Fast microwave- assisted solvothermal synthesis of metal nanoparticles (Pd, Ni, Sn) supported on sulfonated MWCNTs: Pd-based bimetallic catalysts for ethanol oxidation in alkaline medium, Electrochim. Acta. 59 (2012) 310–320. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.10.071

  36. [36]

    Pinheiro, F.M

    V.S. Pinheiro, F.M. Souza, T.C. Gentil, P. Böhnstedt, E.C. Paz, L.S. Parreira, P. Hammer, B.L. Batista, M.C. Santos, Insights in the Study of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Direct Ethanol Fuel Cells using Hybrid Platinum-Ceria Nanorods Electrocatalysts, ChemElectroChem. 6 (2019) 5124–5135. doi:10.1002/celc.201901253

  37. [37]

    W. Lei, Y. Liu, X. Si, J. Xu, W. Du, J. Yang, T. Zhou, J. Lin, Synthesis and magnetic properties of octahedral Fe3O4 via a one-pot hydrothermal route, Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. At. Solid State Phys. 381 (2017) 314–318. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.018

  38. [38]

    Rivera-González, L

    H. Rivera-González, L. Torres-Pacheco, L. Álvarez-Contreras, A. Olivas, M. Guerra- Balcázar, R. Valdez, N. Arjona, Synthesis of Pd–Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles varying the stabilizing agent and additive and their effect on the ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline media, J. Electroanal. Chem. 835 (2019) 301–312. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.01.044

  39. [39]

    H. Mao, L. Wang, P. Zhu, Q. Xu, Q. Li, Carbon-supported PdSn-SnO2 catalyst for ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline media, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 39 (2014) 17583– 17588. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.079

  40. [40]

    E. V. Spinacé, L. A. Indelicato do Vale, A. Oliveira Neto, M. Linardi, Preparation of PtRu/C Anode Electrocatalysts using NaBH4 as Reducing Agent and OH- ions as Stabilizing Agent, ECS Trans. 5 (2007) 89–94. doi:10.1149/1.2728991

  41. [41]

    Nandenha, R.F.B

    J. Nandenha, R.F.B. De Souza, M.H.M.T. Assumpção, E. V. Spinacé, A.O. Neto, Electro-oxidation of formic acid on Pdir/C-Sb2O5.SnO2 electrocatalysts prepared by borohydride reduction, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 (2013) 9171–9179. doi:10.1007/s12678-013-0134-5

  42. [42]

    Piasentin, R.F.B

    R.M. Piasentin, R.F.B. De Souza, J.C.M. Silva, E. V Spinacé, M.C. Santos, a O. Neto, Electrocatalysts Prepared by Borohydride Reduction, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 (2013) 435–445. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84873834580&partnerID=40&md5=60661d7222fedf7c22f7808bbb63eaa2

  43. [43]

    Pinheiro, E.C

    V.S. Pinheiro, E.C. Paz, L.R. Aveiro, L.S. Parreira, F.M. Souza, P.H.C. Camargo, M.C. Santos, Ceria high aspect ratio nanostructures supported on carbon for hydrogen peroxide electrogeneration, Electrochim. Acta. 259 (2018) 865–872. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.010

  44. [44]

    Pinheiro, F.M

    V.S. Pinheiro, F.M. Souza, T.C. Gentil, L.S. Parreira, B.L. Batista, M.C. Santos, Hybrid 36 palladium-ceria nanorod electrocatalysts applications in oxygen reduction and ethanol oxidation reactions in alkaline media, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 46 (2021) 15896–15911. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.056

  45. [45]

    H. Wang, J. Liang, H. Fan, B. Xi, M. Zhang, S. Xiong, Y. Zhu, Y. Qian, Synthesis and gas sensitivities of SnO2 nanorods and hollow microspheres, J. Solid State Chem. 181 (2008) 122–129. doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2007.11.010

  46. [46]

    Cherevko, Electrochemical dissolution of noble metals native oxides, J

    S. Cherevko, Electrochemical dissolution of noble metals native oxides, J. Electroanal. Chem. 787 (2017) 11–13. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.029

  47. [47]

    Sikeyi, T

    L.L. Sikeyi, T. Matthews, A.S. Adekunle, N.W. Maxakato, Electro-oxidation of Ethanol and Methanol on Pd/C, Pd/CNFs and Pd−Ru/CNFs Nanocatalysts in Alkaline Direct Alcohol Fuel Cell, Electroanalysis. 32 (2020) 2681–2692. doi:10.1002/elan.202060260

  48. [48]

    X. Sun, Y. Li, M.J. Li, Highly Dispersed Palladium Nanoparticles on Carbon-Decorated Porous Nickel Electrode: An Effective Strategy to Boost Direct Ethanol Fuel Cell up to 202 mW cm-2, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 11186–11193. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00355

  49. [49]

    Y. Wang, Q. He, J. Guo, J. Wang, Z. Luo, T.D. Shen, K. Ding, A. Khasanov, S. Wei, Z. Guo, Ultrafine FePd Nanoalloys Decorated Multiwalled Cabon Nanotubes toward Enhanced Ethanol Oxidation Reaction, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7 (2015) 23920– 23931. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b06194

  50. [50]

    Silva, I.C

    J.C.M. Silva, I.C. de Freitas, A.O. Neto, E. V. Spinacé, V.A. Ribeiro, Palladium nanoparticles supported on phosphorus-doped carbon for ethanol electro-oxidation in alkaline media, Ionics (Kiel). 24 (2018) 1111–1119. doi:10.1007/s11581-017-2257-9

  51. [51]

    Burton, K

    A.W. Burton, K. Ong, T. Rea, I.Y. Chan, On the estimation of average crystallite size of zeolites from the Scherrer equation: A critical evaluation of its application to zeolites with one-dimensional pore systems, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 117 (2009) 75–90. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.06.010

  52. [52]

    Gentil, M

    T.C. Gentil, M. Minichova, V. Briega-Martos, V.S. Pinheiro, F.M. Souza, J. Paulo C. Moura, J. César M. Silva, B.L. Batista, M.C. Santos, S. Cherevko, Stability of supported Pd-based ethanol oxidation reaction electrocatalysts in alkaline media, J. Catal. 440 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2024.115816

  53. [53]

    Brantley, Z

    W.A. Brantley, Z. Cai, E. Papazoglou, J.C. Mitchell, S.J. Kerber, G.P. Mann, T.L. Barr, X-ray diffraction studies of oxidized high-palladium alloys, Dent. Mater. 12 (1996) 333–

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80043-1

  55. [55]

    Mukherjee, A

    B. Mukherjee, A. Flor, P. Scardi, Effect of oxygen adsorption and oxidation on the strain state of Pd nanocrystals, Appl. Surf. Sci. 541 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148508

  56. [56]

    H. Luo, K. Wang, F. Lin, F. Lv, J. Zhou, W. Zhang, D. Wang, W. Zhang, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, M. Luo, S. Guo, Amorphous MoOx with High Oxophilicity Interfaced with PtMo Alloy Nanoparticles Boosts Anti-CO Hydrogen Electrocatalysis, Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) 1–9. doi:10.1002/adma.202211854

  57. [57]

    Hammer, J.K

    B. Hammer, J.K. Nørskov, Theoretical surface science and catalysis—calculations and concepts, Adv. Catal. 45 (2000) 71–129. doi:10.1016/S0360-0564(02)45013-4

  58. [58]

    N. Xu, H. Yan, X. Jiao, L. Jiang, R. Zhang, J. Wang, Z. Liu, Z. Liu, Y. Gu, F. Gang, X. Wang, L. Zhao, X. Sun, Effect of OH− concentration on Fe3O4 nanoparticle morphologies supported by first principle calculation, J. Cryst. Growth. 547 (2020) 125780. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125780

  59. [59]

    H. Xu, P. Song, J. Wang, F. Gao, Y. Zhang, Y. Shiraishi, Y. Du, High-Quality Platinum- 37 Iron Nanodendrites with a Multibranched Architecture as Efficient Electrocatalysts for the Ethanol Oxidation Reaction, ChemCatChem. 10 (2018) 2195–2199. doi:10.1002/cctc.201800109

  60. [60]

    Lizcano-Valbuena, V.A

    W.H. Lizcano-Valbuena, V.A. Paganin, C.A.P. Leite, F. Galembeck, E.R. Gonzalez, Catalysts for DMFC: Relation between morphology and electrochemical performance, Electrochim. Acta. 48 (2003) 3869–3878. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00523-1

  61. [61]

    Koenigsmann, D.B

    C. Koenigsmann, D.B. Semple, E. Sutter, S.E. Tobierre, S.S. Wong, Ambient synthesis of high-quality ruthenium nanowires and the morphology-dependent electrocatalytic performance of platinum-decorated ruthenium nanowires and nanoparticles in the methanol oxidation reaction, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 5 (2013) 5518–5530. doi:10.1021/am4007462

  62. [62]

    Z. Ji, X. Wang, H. Zhang, S. Lin, H. Meng, B. Sun, S. George, T. Xia, A.E. Nel, J.I. Zink, Designed synthesis of CeO2 nanorods and nanowires for studying toxicological effects of high aspect ratio nanomaterials., ACS Nano. 6 (2012) 5366–80. doi:10.1021/nn3012114

  63. [63]

    Schrader, Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, 1995

    B. Schrader, Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, 1995

  64. [64]

    Socrates, Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies

    G. Socrates, Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies. Tables and charts,

  65. [65]

    doi:10.1002/jrs.1238

  66. [66]

    Jorio, R

    A. Jorio, R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, Raman Spectroscopy in Graphene Related Systems, 2011. doi:10.1002/9783527632695

  67. [67]

    X. Chen, X. Wang, D. Fang, A review on C1s XPS-spectra for some kinds of carbon materials, Fullerenes Nanotub. Carbon Nanostructures. 28 (2020) 1048–1058. doi:10.1080/1536383X.2020.1794851

  68. [68]

    Strzemiecka, A

    B. Strzemiecka, A. Voelkel, J. Donate-Robles, J.M. Martín-Martínez, Assessment of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks by TGA-MS, XPS and inverse gas chromatography using statistical chemometric analysis, Appl. Surf. Sci. 316 (2014) 315–323. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.174

  69. [69]

    W. Lai, G. Xie, R. Dai, C. Kuang, Y. Xu, Z. Pan, L. Zheng, L. Yu, S. Ye, Z. Chen, H. Li, Kinetics and mechanisms of oxytetracycline degradation in an electro-Fenton system with a modified graphite felt cathode, J. Environ. Manage. 257 (2020) 109968. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109968

  70. [70]

    Xing, Y.-F

    X.-L. Xing, Y.-F. Zhao, H. Li, C.-T. Wang, Q.-X. Li, W.-B. Cai, High Performance Ag Rich Pd-Ag Bimetallic Electrocatalyst for Ethylene Glycol Oxidation in Alkaline Media, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165 (2018) J3259–J3265. doi:10.1149/2.0311815jes

  71. [71]

    Krittayavathananon, S

    A. Krittayavathananon, S. Duangdangchote, P. Pannopard, N. Chanlek, S. Sathyamoorthi, J. Limtrakul, M. Sawangphruk, Elucidating the unexpected electrocatalytic activity of nanoscale PdO layers on Pd electrocatalysts towards ethanol oxidation in a basic solution, Sustain. Energy Fuels. 4 (2020) 1118–1125. doi:10.1039/c9se00848a

  72. [72]

    Cheong, C

    J.Y. Cheong, C. Kim, J.W. Jung, T.G. Yun, D.Y. Youn, S.H. Cho, K.R. Yoon, H.Y. Jang, S.W. Song, I.D. Kim, Incorporation of amorphous TiO2 into one-dimensional SnO2 nanostructures as superior anodes for lithium-ion batteries, J. Power Sources. 400 (2018) 485–492. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.060

  73. [73]

    Zhang, C

    W. Zhang, C. Jiang, H. Guan, Y. Wang, Y. Hu, W. Wang, W. Tian, L. Hao, Unlocking OER catalytic potential and chiral Fe3O4 film as a game-changer for electrochemical water oxidation pathway and by-product control, Mater. Adv. 5 (2024) 1340–1347. doi:10.1039/d3ma00854a. 38

  74. [74]

    Liang, T.S

    Z.X. Liang, T.S. Zhao, J.B. Xu, L.D. Zhu, Mechanism study of the ethanol oxidation reaction on palladium in alkaline media, Electrochim. Acta. 54 (2009) 2203–2208. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.10.034

  75. [75]

    H. An, L. Pan, H. Cui, B. Li, D. Zhou, J. Zhai, Q. Li, Synthesis and performance of palladium-based catalysts for methanol and ethanol oxidation in alkaline fuel cells, Electrochim. Acta. 102 (2013) 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.142

  76. [76]

    Nguyen, M.K

    M.T.X. Nguyen, M.K. Nguyen, P.T.T. Pham, H.K.P. Huynh, H.H. Pham, C.C. Vo, S.T. Nguyen, High-performance Pd-coated Ni nanowire electrocatalysts for alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells, J. Electroanal. Chem. 888 (2021) 115180. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115180

  77. [77]

    J. Guo, R. Chen, F.C. Zhu, S.G. Sun, H.M. Villullas, New understandings of ethanol oxidation reaction mechanism on Pd/C and Pd2Ru/C catalysts in alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 224 (2018) 602–611. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.037

  78. [78]

    D. Chen, C. Chen, Z.M. Baiyee, Z. Shao, F. Ciucci, Nonstoichiometric Oxides as Low- Cost and Highly-Efficient Oxygen Reduction/Evolution Catalysts for Low-Temperature Electrochemical Devices, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 9869–9921. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00073

  79. [79]

    Angelucci, H

    C.A. Angelucci, H. Varela, G. Tremiliosi-Filho, J.F. Gomes, The significance of non- covalent interactions on the electro-oxidation of alcohols on Pt and Au in alkaline media, Electrochem. Commun. 33 (2013) 10–13. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2013.03.039

  80. [80]

    López-Suárez, A

    F.E. López-Suárez, A. Bueno-López, K.I.B. Eguiluz, G.R. Salazar-Banda, Pt-Sn/C catalysts prepared by sodium borohydride reduction for alcohol oxidation in fuel cells: Effect of the precursor addition order, J. Power Sources. 268 (2014) 225–232. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.042

Showing first 80 references.